him. he has engaged in lots of good things. he has been a good father and husband and a good friend to othersnd a generous person. of course, that can't erase his criminal activity, but it is, they are factors that count, the court must take into account. judge gaertner, what judge ellis did was illustrate the life of privilege of a man who has committed a decades worth of serious crimes. >> right. the comment he lived an otherwise blameless life is something that could apply to literally every single white collar defendant that i have ever sentenced or i would dare say across the country. in fact, one of the reasons why white collar crime was dealt with more severely in the sentencing guidelines since 1985 was precisely because someone could do very pbad things aftera very good life. the best example is ken ley,