colluded with a foreign power. if his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. if he had other evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the special counsel and not "the new york times." his statement is purely political and the president has full authority to revoke his security clearance as head of the executive branch. what do you make of that response from senator burr? >> i respect senator burr, he runs a good committee in a non partisan way. as an american, i am free to disagree with him and do it in a friendly way. we don't have to hate each other. i do disagree with him. i disagree with him because because my belief that john brennan's conclusion is based on what he sees with his own eyes