understand. it's not quite as cumbersome as what we're getting into today. a lot of that was presented yesterday. he was present the false evidence in order to continue this luxurious lifestyle. once the money dried up he started pretending he had more to leverage. that's something they can see as a clear lie. a clear violation of ethics and financial law. that doesn't seem to be as in the weeds. it makes sense they're going soefr thin over things that the jury can relate to. i think we'll start to see them pull out from this tedious questioning of tax statements. page by page. display it for the jury. they're making it as clear as day, but sometimes you can get lost in a lot of these details. >> i do want to tie the manafort case potentially to the russia