>> so in other words, pete, i know one of the frasss that had been used to describe some of the arguments in this case were the president's tweets could be used against him. in this instance the supreme court is ruling they were not? >> reporter: well, yeah, i guess the supreme court is saying we're aware of those tweets, they don't help him much, but the fact is they don't help the challengers enough. they don't undercut fact that the -- the enactment itself, the thing that was announced in september, version three of the travel ban, if you just look at the cold words on the page is neutral, the president had the authori authority to do that. so those tweets while they don't help a lot don't hurt enough to make thune constitutional or at least to uphold this injunction that was issued by the judge in hawaii. >> pete williams over at the supreme court. over on capitol hill by the way, paul ryan is not reacting or responding to this just yet. he was just asked by reporters