we still have our veto at the united nations and can decide what climate ceilings are in the paris agreement. what was missing was any diplomatic position for the rest of the world to rally around. i don't know if that's an echo of george w. bush or not but this was not a speech in any way that was designed to garner international support. >> david ignatius, what was your takeaway from this speech? >> i thought it had bombastic rhetoric, as always with donald trump. he dropped the equivalent of twitter bombs. when i looked at it, as you and i have discussed, i found there was an awful lot of conventional language, especially about the united nations that, to be honest, i found welcomed. i thought that the president was attaching his america first view as a stress on sovereignty to the united nations and its institutions. he has become a champion of u.n. reform. that's good. he actually talked about doing more on human rights issues. that's a rare moment for the trump administration.