some of the lack that the prosecutor uses. he calls them loud-mouths, right? so, again, this is to a white jury, again, their imagination goes into, these are the kinds of young people that my i might be threatened by. so the problem is that it's never, as rinku said, brought out explicitly on the table. what's going on here. why is it this man feels threatened by these young people? does he have a history of feeling animosity towards african-americans? that's never wrought up in the case. and therefore, we're looking at the case in a vacuum, even though the context is being shaped by these powerful, heavily loaded racial stereotypes, which i think results in the kind of verdict that we found. >> so, kendall, just to bring you back in, is there something about the law, the stand your ground law itself, that encourages that kind of framing or makes it difficult to bring an issue of race, because you really don't need to do it. you just feneed to prove that yr