advertising for positions that exclude unemployed work. i never heard anything like this. is it a good idea? well, there are 14 million people out of work today in the united states, and 4.5 million of those have been unemployed for more than a year. so do the math. 4.5 million people sitting out there right now who want to work right now, in fact are walking the streets looking for jobs. dana milbank is with the "washington post" and steve moore is with the "wall street journal." steve, what is the case for employers being allowed to say, don't waste my time if you're unemployed, looking for a job? you're not even going to get an interview here. >> well, i don't think it's right to say, like, you know, like irish need not apply, unemployed need not apply. but i do think, chris, that it is important for employers to be able to look at the worker job history, and if somebody's been out of work for a long time, for better or for worse, that's usually a negative on their resume. it doesn't look -- i always tell