couple of different ways. first of all, rupert murdoch is 80 years old. all of this is actually setting up his legacy. and this is just a terrible note to go out on. in addition, he set up james murdoch to be heir to the throne, who had been promoted not that long ago amidst the scandal, moved to new york. some say because he needed to get out of the way of what everybody knew was going to boil over in terms of rage of the uk about the "news of the world" scandal. and the question is actually whether murdoch's legacy can survive this, and whether his son has a sincere intention to bring "news of the world" and newscorp international into the next century, and actually behave like a corporate citizen that puts public welfare and quite honestly shareholder concerns above their personal and political agenda. >> finally, i wanted to ask you, a lot of people are now looking at the way the rest of the british media treated the scandal in the beginning and