than national security or if names should be redacted that shouldn't be made public. jon: it is rare that the house of representatives does anything unanimously, and they basically unanimously voted to make the report public. i mentioned that the president says he agrees. here's what he tweeted about it. he writes: on the recent non-winding -- binding vote in congress, i told leadership to let all republicans vote for transparency. makes us all look good and doesn't matter. play along with the guam. it sounds like he's not too concerned about what this report might say. >> well, he's already, his team has already crafted a response to it, and it's approaching, i think, just under a hundred pages last time the president talked about it. i do think, obviously, he's concerned about it. but at the same time, this was a vote that was initially drafted, and i think democrats thought they were going to divide republicans, and republican leaders just said, listen, we're for transparency too. we want to see what's in here.