that up as you were referencing it part of this summary is calledex does not mention michael sources and executive of a private business intelligence firm, and a former employee of a friendly intelligence service who has been compensated for previous reporting over the past three years. this source collected this information on behalf of private clients and not compensated for it by the fbi. so why is it significant tay this was not made clear to president trump who this was, and who paid him? >> well i think it raise ares two questions. first, you know, if you're briefing the president of the united states i think it is important to show the credibility and what you're dealing with whether it's opposition research or comes from unbiased source, and so you know, discovering who actually funded this, why there was an interest in getting this material would be important for the president to know. and not only that we saw in his previous testimony it was