does it like an activist himself meeting with the media. there are some huge problems with that anyone who looks at the addendum at the bottom and thinks they were transparent with that fisa judge isn't paying attention. the democratic national committee, along with hillary clinton's campaign paid for this and then you might put in i believe it's valid. and then the judge can make his own decision. but, until we see the fisa documents, it's all up to conjecture and posturing. rachel: where are these fisa judges? if i were a fisa judge and been provided this incomplete information, i would be angry. i don't understand the system enough, they are upset. steve: listen. it's all secret. we are probably never going to see you any of that stuff. to nunes' point, it looks like the department of justice, when they have provided documents to members of congress and whatnot, they have redacted them so significantly, it does look like they are hiding some stuff. rachel: let's not forget former director james comey went back in early part of the administration, back in