restraining order. the purpose of which was to -- so that she could have her meeting to disrupt the ben shapiro event in august. we are now counter suing her back for damages and we are suing her attorney for sanctions for bringing this frivolous action. pete: mark, we have been showing videos of yvette and punching a protester that was not your client troy worden. we will note that yvette is the leader of a group called by any means necessary, an anti-fascist group, by any means necessary according to her means punching people at events if necessary. where do you believe this will go ultimately? your client is suing because he doesn't want to be assaulted and wants the ability to have free speech as a college republican at berkeley. what's your hopeful outcome on this? >> well, you know, as you said earlier, hit them where it hurts in their pocketbook. and, you know, we're not