look, you caught him in a glaring contradiction. you asked him as a 32-year-old man did you date 17 and 18-year-olds. he said, quote, if i did i'm not going to dispute anything. later when you asked him the second time, he said if i did, i don't remember. you asked him a third time, and he said absolutely not. now, that is at best inconsistency, at worst a contradiction. and jurors are told there's a standard jury instruction the judge reads to them f you find that the witness is lying in one part of their story, you macon clued the witness is lying about everything. and that's how i felt about judge roy moore today. i was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. because of the source of this information. the "washington post" which endorsed his opponent. and because of the age. >> sean: what if he, as i was