>> bottom line, no. in 1989 congress, without much notice or discussion, i might add, passed a law that renders them immune for liability for torts committed in the office or scope of their employment. since then the courts have construed it to become broader and broader. so now even if a congressman is discussing their personal life to a reporter that scon striewd as having an aan effect on relationship with a constituent so that would be protected. ainsley: we are all taxpayers or most of us at least in this country are taxpayers. so they are still taking our money. we are not allowed to sue. what if you give donor money during the campaign. there is a man in virginia his name is bob hagman. he is 70 years old. he is filing a suit against the rnc for fraud saying congress can't get repeal and replace done. that's why he gave his -- whoever was elected in his area. that's why he gave them money. and they are not getting it done. he wants his money back. does he have a case? >> he does have a case he is saying this is fraud. this is racketeering because
Related Keywords
Office , Bottom Line , Congress , Courts , Law , Discussion , Notice , Broader , Scope , Itorts , Liability , Employment , 1989 , Ainsley Doesn T , Us , Country , Congressman , Relationship , Life , Reporter , Taxpayers , Most , Aan Effect , Constituent , Scon Striewd , Name , Oman , Money , Suit , Fraud , Bob Hagman , Virginia , Campaign , Rnc , Donor , Sue , 70 , Case , Area , Racketeering ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.