i don't think you are contesting the reality of that video or its veracity. you are saying the guy is not your client. when you spoke to a judge, you said, look, people were saying unpleasant things. what does that have to do with the assault that took place? why is that relevant to anythin anything? >> i think there was a lot of anger at the demonstration on april 15th. these ultra bright people, who were using nazi and kkk sleuth, waving a flag that has nazi and kkk things on it, what happened beyond that needs to be proven in court. i don't think there was proof that my client attacked anyone. >> tucker: okay, but you are totally missing my point, witches, your job as lawyer, presumably to argue that mike i wasn't even there. the he didn't do that. but somebody did do that. whether it was your client or not, why does it matter what people are saying?