and get to the bottom of this. of course, it's what the american people deserve. trying do these red herrings, it makes no sense. >> kimberly, we have to be aware of the impact of prejudicial publicity. for the f.b.i. to participate in these leaks, actually would destroy any case that they would try to build so this is really a wrong approach. it's damaging to our substitution -- constitution and it hurts our country. the f.b.i. ought to get back to the basic work of doing investigations without trying to convict people through rumors, independent wend doe and leaks. >> kimberly: absolut absolute -- innuendo and leaks. >> kimberly: absolutely. they already had the problems under comey and with the hillary clinton investigation and now this. this is unseen leak for the f.b.i.. >> this is all being done through unnamed sources. every "new york times" and "washington post" report. here is the thing about unnamed sources that people at home don't like. they don't know the motives, credibility or access that the sources have to the president's inner circle. "new york times" say style guide