federal code. another example is that we refer to the president's wife. now, as we know, if the democratic potential nominee hillary it's very likely we could have a woman as. it would not be the president's wife. it would be the president's husband in this case. so i i think actually that's the broader debate should we actually be making these gender-based assumptions in our federal code at all? again, this doesn't have anything to do with anything outside of the language that our federal government uses nor should it. >> amos, christie, thank you both for joining us today a debate that's going to continue and certainly revolving around political correctness and the law. thank you both for being here. >> thank you. >> voters getting fired up over one of the hottest debate of the 2016 election. illegal immigration. >> why is the border so porous that they're able to get back in and commit such a heinous crime. >> if you are illegal you shouldn't be here. >> frank luntz checking the pulse of american voters.