disagree. he actually did, he actually did come forward and say he would release any documents he wanted if issa would give a good faith agreement they would no pursue contempt. >> he would have not have pursued contempt if he had released documents in the subpoena. i don't understand that point. >> this is the political season. heather: marjorie, many of the paperwork released a loot was blacked out. in a letter to speaker boehner, deputy attorney general james coal said holder properly with held documents under executive privilege which allows president obama to keep private documents on internal discussions. the speaker boehner says the only facts they have come from whistle-blowers and others associated with it. why not just release the documents? and the bottom line question is, does the family of brian terry not deserve to know the truth, marjorie? >> i absolutely believe brian terry deserves justice