misdistricted. they didn't get the email in time. you know, the appellate court would not find that harmless error. don't you agree. >> i do agree. it was not harmless error. i am obviously very disappointed in what i heard about those severance. at the end of the day, it doesn't seems that it was as hinky as you say as it looked in the beginning. first of all, this is the type of case that you have to, you know, dot your eyes and cross your t's backwards and forwards. the people you are hiring have double-checked and triple checked their work. if that had been done potentially this would have been found out. however, what comes to light, you know, the guy bradley he said that he told the prosecutors early back in june june 26th. >> the new reports say that wasn't accurate. actually the email searches or the email address that he sent this to did not get to the prosecutors and that it actually did not get to the prosecutors until i believe it was july 4th. and that by the time the prosecutors were going to