repeated over and over and it's wrong and it becomes something that's assumed and it's wrong and you see now it's incredible when you look at even the last story we did, we looked at ten years, '85 to '95, the year he wrote "art of the deal" he had $42.4 million in core business losses that year. if there was any period i would have guessed not having seen his taxes, when i first saw. i would have thought, maybe the year he wrote that book. i don't know, i grew up in the prairies, there's a saying, all hot and no tot for guys that do stuff like this. you see that with him and how this has continued. it's amazing when we go back and try to rewind it. those are more powerful. >> we've had now a tax return. and as well, we've had a huge amount of tax and banking information on his father that's given us this incredible look.