focus with as few distractions as possible, going into his argument why a president shouldn't be indicted. i understand that's not contradictory to saying the focus should be on impeachment, but the point is that he has come to understand, he said, more of the difficulties and the role of the president vis-a-vis dealing with an investigation like the two of you worked on. >> right, that it can be a great distraction. it's important to know in this article he's talking about statutory reforms. he specifically talks about clinton v clinton versus jones, which held constitutionally the president has no right to defer a civil suit. but the court in jones, which was a unanimous decision, said look, if congress wants to pass a law providing for a deferral, just defer until you're out of office, like congress has already done for some military members, congress can do so. that's what brett argued in that