take a listen. >> like the statement that don junior issued is true, there's no inaccuracy in the statement. the president weighed in as any father would based on the limited information that he had. >> different story. what are the implications? join us now robert ray and cn contributor john dean, former nixon white house counsel and the author of "conservatives without conscience." counselor dean, let's start with you. what do you believe the implications of this changing story is by the white house on a narrative level and any legal implications to the president's potential involvement? >> well, politically it, puts it to his lawyer very quickly and makes a liar out of his lawyer. on the broader scale, i looked at the lift of impeachments and i found na false statements have always played a role, while they may not be criminal acts in themself, indeed they do show a