you because we're talking about the president's chief. this is a tremendous day in foreign policy news. the president's chief strategist, steve bannon, no longer going to have a prominent seat on the national security council. here's what "the new york times" is reporting tonight. "mr. bannon resisted the move even threatening at one point to quit if it went forward, that's according to a white house official who like others insisted on anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. mr. bannon's camp denied he had threatened to resign and spend the day spreading the word that the shift was a natural evolution not a signal of any diminution of his outsize." >> what's your reaction to the reporting? >> what it does seem to suggest, and let's hope this is an early sign of a shift, which is the emergence of professionalism or the return of professionalism in american foreign policy. you know, there's always been this paradox which is trump's own foreign policy views have