when considering imminent threat, it's important to consider the response time and reaction time. the reality is that mr. scott could have raised his gun and killed officer vincent or another officer before any of them could have reacted to the threat. reaction time studies dealing with police shootings provide valuable insight for the analysis of this shooting and these studies are cited in the report. those studies show that in these scenarios the result is a tie, at best. even officers in a position of ready, watching somebody, if they're armed with a gun to their side, by the time they do this, the reaction from officers has to be from the brain to the trigger finger and the studies say it is tie at best. when considering -- i'm sorry. i think there's a misconception out there about the scope of the review in the d.a.'s office. this office did not examine whether an officer followed cmpd