Is it better to engage with fossil fuel companies or to divest? Banks appear to have voted with their funds, as financing continues to be funnelled to fossil fuel companies that are in expansion mode. Is this what a just, orderly and responsible transition to net-zero emissions by 2050 looks like?

Related Keywords

Vietnam , Republic Of , Paris , France General , France , Italy , Saudi Arabia , United Kingdom , Canada , Australia , Glasgow , Glasgow City , Japan , United States , Ukraine , Russia , Canadian , Australian , British , Saudi , French , America , Lindsay Patrick , Lucie Pinson , Fiona Melrose , Tracey Mcdermott , Remco Fischer , Farnam Bidgoli , Stephen Jennings , Ehsan Khoman , Jeanne Martin , Glasgow Financial Alliance For Net , Sierra Club , Bloomberg , Wells Fargo , Tc Energy , Network For Greening The Financial System , Morgan Stanley , Rainforest Action Network , Conocophillips , Un Environment Programme Finance Initiative , Goldman Sachs , National Bank Financial , Organization For Economic , Partnership For Carbon Accounting Financials , International Energy Agency , Royal Bank , Saudi Aramco , Banking Alliance , Paris Agreement , Zero Emissions , Climate Chaos Fossil Fuel Finance , Reclaim Finance , Climate Chaos , Venture Global , Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project , British Columbia , Nova Scotia , Net Zero Banking Alliance , Financial System , Economic Co Operation , Glasgow Financial Alliance , Net Zero , Middle East , Carbon Accounting Financials , Programme Finance Initiative , Fossil Fuels , Climate Transition , Fossil Fuel Financing , Ank Fossil Fuels , Funding , Sustainable Finance , Fossil Fuel Divestment , Fossil Fuel Investment ,