fast and last a full 24 hours. so zaid can be bva deliverer of dance? >> okay. day and pains a thing of the past, because only temper material eases your pressure points in a way no other mattress can, for a limited time, save up to $500 on select temper p-adic adjustable matters for sets, arthritis pain. we say not today. tylenol, eight hour arthritis pain has two layers of relief the first is past, the second is long-lasting. >> we give you your day bag so you can give it everything tylenol. number one, doctor recommended birthright his pain. >> so this has pickleball with e-trade for morgan stanley were ready for whatever gets served up, didn't get dressed i'd rather work on saving for retirement poole college since you'd like to get schools, has pre-built, burned, right? it's terms day off. >> but neutrogena, ultra shear sunscreen is still on the clock. vital sun protection goes six layers deep, blocking 97% of burning uv rays it's light, but it's working hard he liked me, neutrogena ultras, your sunscreen. >> rafael romo at the georgia state capitol in atlanta. this is cnn on the case. >> the jury in the dark i'm old trump hush money. trial reviewing testimony as they weigh what will be a historic decision whether the former president should be found guilty or not. boeing's re-brand after several high profile problems, the ear the air craft maker appears ready to commit to sweeping changes as boeing tries to reassure nervous wires that it is taking its safety issues serious and building a better submersible, a billionaire has a plan to visit the site of the titanic ship wreck. and this is not a rerun. he's doing this even after the last mission like this ended in tragedy we're following these major developing stories and many more all coming in right here to cnn news central right now the jury is entering its ninth hour of deliberations in what could be the first ever criminal conviction of a former president this is now the second day of deliberations in donald trump's hush money trial. this morning started with jurors sending a new node to the judge asking him to reread some of the instructions he gave yesterday, starting with a metaphor about rain meant to help the jury understand how to consider facts and what inferences can be drawn from those, as well as the instructions related to count one of trump's 34 charges. >> jurors also rehearse testimony from key prosecution witnesses, national enquirer, publisher, david pecker and trump's former attorney, michael cohen. these specifically wanted to hear what each of those men said about the 2015 meeting at trump tower and what pecker said about the catch-and-kill deal with playmate karen mcdougal, including his phone call with trump. we have cnn's paula reid and kristen holmes who are outside of the courtroom there in new york polo, let's talk about the jury instructions what this rain metaphor was all about this metaphor is meant to help the jury understand when did they can make inferences so the metaphor goes like this. >> they're saying, for example, suppose you go to bad one night when it's not rating and you wake up in the morning, you look out your way and though you don't see rain, but you see that the street and the sidewalk or wet and people are ring, room raincoats, and carrying umbrellas. well, under those circumstances, it may be reasonable to infer that is conclude that it rain during the night. in other words, the fact of it having rained while you were asleep is an inference that might be drawn from the proven facts the presence of water on the street and the sidewalk, and people in raincoats and carrying umbrellas. so this is one of the instructions that the jury is now received twice that this was to help guide them in their deliberations, help them understand what can they do with the evidence that they've received? how can they apply this to the laws that have been charged here? and there will be something and things of course, in the course of this case. but they haven't seen direct evidence of obviously, they didn't witness it themselves. but there are a few gaps that they will need to fill in potentially with inferences if they are going to agree with the prosecution's case. but if think about a metaphor, i mean, this is a figure of speech. she now take a metaphor, take it across 12 people with different lived experience it is, and apply it to 34 counts. you can imagine how something like this could cause confusion. but this is a common instruction that has given a juries across the country to help them understand the job that they have. but it is difficult to do this job when you don't have a written copy of the instructions and it wouldn't be surprising if they came back and asked for additional clarity on these instructions and polo, what about the jury asking for clarification about county one of the 34 yeah, i think it's interesting that they only ask for clarification on count one, we don't know anything for sure, but you could infer if we want to go with the rain metaphor that perhaps they are walking through this chronologically. >> again, there are 34 counts. they extend across three different kinds of documents over the course of a year. but here the he instructed them that they must find that trump personally or in concert with another made or caused a false entry in business records that trump did so with the intent to defraud that included an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof. now want to go to the first point? it's saying trump personally or in concert with another made or cause a false entry. and this is something is speaking sources at the district attorney's office. this is something that they consistently emphasized a trump may not have ordered, right? michael cohen to submit a false invoice, but they believe that he set this all in motion. they argue that under the law that he should be convicted of falsifying business records even if he didn't select the option from the drop-down menu for them, this language at the top is very important. and the second part of the instructions for account one, prosecutors have charged this as a felony again, these are misdemeanors, falsifying business records, but they're being charged as a felony because they argue that this was all done to help trump win in 2016, which could have violated. they say three different laws, so they don't need to prove those. they don't need to decide this other laws. they just need to agree that he did indeed mean to violate another loss. so this jury has a lot of work in front of them. >> yeah, they certainly do. and christian, i know you've been talking to your sources. how is trump feeling today i'm donald trump and his team are doing almost exactly what all of us are. >> a lot of speculating, trying to read the tea leaves, trying to figure out what exactly this jury is doing. and when we might potentially get a verdict now i am told that there as a tv in the room, they're awaiting and he has been watching coverage. also getting clips of his surrogates defending him on television. not that surprising. something donald trump really likes to have there. but one other thing that i've been told is that donald trump has told people around him that he thinks it's possible he will be convicted, that he believes that it is going to be ian unfair trial. obviously, we know something donald trump says a lot because of the jury makeup. now i do want to point to one thing which is a recent poll that just came out about how voters feel about the possibility of donald trump being killed convicted, or not. now this is just people who are trump voters. only. but this is what it says. it says, if trump is found guilty, are fewer or less likely to vote for him, that scenario that is 7% more likely to vote for trump, 24%. would it make a difference? 68%? now donald trump's team is brushing off that 7%, saying they do not think that is accurate. most of the polling that they have seen has donald trump up by a large lead. >> but i will say that 7% could be absolutely critical in an election with joe biden, particularly when both sides here believed the margin is going to be so small and, kristen this trial isn't the only thing the campaign is having to respond to today. >> there's some breaking news coming out this is a stunning allegation made by an early producer of the apprentice show by the name of bill pruitt. >> he alleges that donald trump, during the apprentice filming used the n word at a black finalist in the show are referring to a black finalist in the show by the name of kwame kwame jackson. now, this is something that had been rumored for a very long time, but we had never heard it directly from somebody who had worked on the show and you might be wondering why he was coming out. now when he says that he was under an nda, that would find him $5 million if he talked about what happened in the show and now that nda has expired and that's why he's coming forward now again, i do want to also mention that this producer said there was a recording of this and that is something that we have heard before, but cnn has not heard this reporting and we do have pushback from the campaign sayings is absolutely false in a statement from the spokesperson, they said this is a completely fabricated and bs story that was already peddled in 2016 nobody took it seriously then and they won't now because it's fake news. he goes on and tries to link this to the democrats, to joe biden saying they planted the story. i do want to note that kwame jackson is going to be on with abby phillip later tonight for that interview after this news came out all right. >> kristin, thank you for that, paula. thank you as well. let's talk more now with former trump attorney tim parlatore. he represented trump in the classified documents case and this rain metaphor, i wonder what you think about it when you hear that is part of the instructions they wanted repeated the jury, they wanted to hear about this. what does that tell you? could that be sine of a holdout you know, it's difficult to really know for sure, but this is the kinda thing that it suggests to me, especially in conjunction with some of the other notes that the jurors are trying to come to an agreement on certain things. >> and when they want this type of instruction oftentimes is because there's a disagreement amongst them as to how much of an inference is reasonable and what i would be looking for if i were in the courtroom is when the jury comes in and when the judges reading this specific instruction, how are they reacting? how many of them are nodding, how many of them are shaking their heads i've even had were during this exact type of instruction, you'll see one or two jurors that turn to another juror see so once where the judge says, okay is that sufficient and everybody kind of looks at one juror is like, is it because they all listen for it? >> it's just wanted exactly. >> so i think that it definitely indicates that there is you know, some disagreement over whether an inference that the jury is trying to or at least some people on the jury is trying to make is reasonable or not. >> and then asking for clarity on count one. >> right. how does that fit into the picture as i recall, and i haven't had chance to go back a look at the indictment says instead, came out, but as i recall, the first couple of counts have to do with the checks that were signed, not by donald trump, but by eric and don junior checks from the trust came from the trust. >> so if you take those two together and of course, i'm guessing here, i have no idea it could be that they're trying to sit there and say, okay, is it reasonable to infer that he participated directed, or active in concert with if he didn't sign the checks. and so they may be looking at are we have taken the first four counts and knocking them out based on his lack of personal participation. >> does that give more credence to the idea that we've heard from some legal experts that the jury, looking at all 34 counts, could decide he's guilty on some and not on others. >> i think it does. i mean, i think that for them to find him guilty of all 30 three 34 counts would be very difficult because when you look in, if you even if you take the weisselberg calculations at face value, the reality is that 130,000 of it was to repay for the stormy daniels 20 or 50 is for redfin and a portion of that they put right in there. it's far as phi and so for you to say that all 34 counts that are false at a minimum, some of those go to the portion that is for the fee. some of that goes to the portion where he plus it up for tax purposes, although he never then declared it on his taxes. so that's also money that he pocketed i can very much see a jury sitting there and saying, okay, 130,000 or 150,000 is the repayment. and so we'll maybe find him guilty of checks up to that amount. >> let's we spoke a moment ago off camera about the gag order. >> yeah. >> donald trump, anytime that he's spoken outside the courtroom or even on social media about the case. he laments that he can't more vocally go after who he wants to go after? >> now that the witnesses have testified, you think it's time for the defense to revisit the gag order, and and push the judge. >> it perplexes me. >> the todd blanche hasn't made this motion yet because gag orders by their very nature, it's a perspective restriction for your free speech rights. there presumptively unconstitutional, except in very limited circumstances to protect the integrity of the proceedings. oftentimes they expire as soon as the jury is sworn in, because when you have an unswerving jury, you have a bunch of perspective jurors. you could take the jury pool, but once they're sworn in, you have those 12 people that the judge sits there and says, don't look at the news media. and so therefore, whatever public statements theoretically as long as they listen to the judge it doesn't take them hard, not for some it's hard though, right? >> you're in luck there in new york city. this is what's happening right now. you can see how some of that information, if donald trump, whatever he says, could, could kind of get out there into the ether. i mean, what do you what do you think about that argument? she's it should that not be considered for a judge to keep a restriction on free speech in place based on a presumption of juror misconduct, essentially, because he's ordering the jurors not to look at a news media to restrict somebody's free speech on a presumption of misconduct by jurors, i think would be very difficult for him to really defend. he kept it in place during the course of the trial on the theory that talking about witnesses before they testify could have an effect on the witnesses of intimidating them now, all the witnesses have testified, and so he can't really say that it's for that purpose either. so i think it todd blanche went in there yeah. right now. you could just call the judge says, hey, judge, can we have a quick here and i'd like to make an oral application and i think the judge would be hard pressed not to vacate it right now. the only conceivable reason i could see is if he says, well, there might be a hung jury, and so i want to protect the next jury pool for the retrial i know words. nobody wants to hear us it out loud. read still still perhaps weight on the road. we very much decision. >> tim parlatore. thank you so much. we appreciate your insight into hadn't this hour on cnn news central, the faa has just responded to boeing's safety plan. these are changes that the aircraft manufacturer says it's making after a series of in-flight mishaps plus a cnn exclusive details about how the us had to negotiate with haitian gang leaders to retrieve read the bodies of two american missionaries, killed. and that nation in one of the most active tornado seasons. >> you can't control what kinds of interventions can we design go inside the store the premiere of violent earth with liev schreiber, sunday at nine on cnn it's really been a gift having mom live with us. but as a nurse, my training told me she needed more help than i could provide. so i connected with the place for mom. my senior living adviser. understood are unique situation she quickly recommended communities and set up tours, a place for mom helped us get to a decision and now mom is so well cared for talk to an expert senior living advisor today at no cost to your family. what a theory of exposure, right. and your brokerage account get it with the symbol eth they scale ethereum trust world's largest ethereum fund, or the crypto investing, begins here allergies with allegro. they won't stop me. nothing beats allegro. it's the fastest non drowsy 24 hour allergy relief live. your greatness. >> what's considered normal for your cat is interesting. but if your cat isn't there, corky self, lately, they may have pain from a common condition called osteoarthritis now, there's someone cia silane cia is a once monthly injection to control your cat's away pain. veterinary professionals ministering cynthia, who are pregnant, trying to conceive or breastfeeding should take extreme care to avoid self injection. self injection could cause allergic reactions like anaphylaxis. asked her bet about cylance yet and help get your cat back to their normal its terms, day off. >> but neutrogena, ultra shear sunscreen is still on the clock. >> vital sun section goes six layers deep blocking 97% of burning uv rays. it's light, but it's working hard. >> he liked me neutrogena, ultra shear sunscreen determines if you've been paying attention, it's easy to see prices are going up on just about everything that's why you need to do your wallet a favor and call khartiia. >> now one called khartiia lachy and into today's low price. so you can george peace of mind, knowing that you're not only protected from mechanical breakdowns, but also from those rising rates. if you're driving an out of warranty vehicle car shield offers plans that cover up to six styles and parts and systems in your car truck, or suv. why pay for expensive repairs called car shield now, before break down my mom to indycar car showed i listened and i said $5,000. you should always listen to your mom when i needed long-term protection at affordable prices, i call it car shield. >> i've been a car show customer for close to seven years, had three vehicles covered and they saved me close $9,000 car. >> she'll saved me $2,200 qarrah show administrators covers expensive repair, so i don't have to it's so simple a plan to carnassial means we have a vehicle that needs repairs there, administrators. got you. back. but wait, garland's there's more lots more ex machina. people love extras like i do see, i love a plan that includes 24/7 coast-to-coast roadside assistance courtesy to and rental car options to durham expensive car breakdowns will happen. the differences calling car shield before they do. so, listen to on biblical and called car shoot down to protect yourself from rising rates and costly repairs, call now, it get yourself a free quote it's not a matter of if your car will break down with, you need to call car shield before your car breaks down. >> car shield gives you a price lot guarantee, which means your monthly price never goes up for as long as you cover for your car, get help paying for expensive repair bills by calling car shield. now, call 804 986955, 800, 804, 986955, 800, 986955 rife diabetes. there's no slowing down. each day is a unique blend of people to see and things to do that's why you choose concern to help manage blood sugar response uniquely designed with carbs steady glue, sirna, bring on the day denture wearers can go wild with wild. >> he said c-h bond denture seals gets strong all day, hold, thanks to gradual release technology. go wild move, bond, wildly i'm zachary cohen a