Source tonight from never trump are two potential Vice President never say never, i guess republican senator j. D. Vance, now, one of Donald Trumps staunchest advocates, not only trying to help him win the white house but also in the running to join in this time, he joins us live in moments and a former president back on the Campaign Trail tonight after being held in contempt for violating his Gag Order Nine Times hes now racing back to new york just to learn if he just violated it. Again also tonight we are tracking the clashes in the crackdowns that are happening on College Campuses across america. Hundreds of protesters have been arrested, and well show you knew exclusive Police Bodycam footage in moments. One of our sources tonight is former new york city mayor bill two block z0 on how his successor is handling it. All. Im Kaitlan Collins and this is the source at long last. There is music to Donald Trumps ears, macho man, and ymca, the hallmarks of his maga rallies, blaring again today as the former president return to the Campaign Trail for the First Time Since his criminal trial began here in new york, trump held rallies and two critical Battleground States that he captured in 2016, but lost in 2020. Michigan and wisconsin. Yet even out on the Campaign Trail, the legal cloud was still hovering over him as you know, ive come here today from new york city where im being forced to sit for days on end in a kangaroo courtroom with a corrupt and conflicted judge, Enduring A Biden Show Trial that i have a judge who gagged me. Im not allowed to talk about things its really just a normal courtroom. Ive been inside of there as trump was sitting at the defense table, and i should note this is not a biden trial. His claims about the judge being corrupt are baseless. But despite his assertion that hes not allowed to talk about this case while he is talking about this case on camera, he is allowed to say everything that you just heard that there attacks on the judge dont fall under the gag order that trump is under, and his return to the Campaign Trail was quite brief, but actually we back here and Court Tomorrow when his Hush Money Trial resumes and brighten early at that before the witness gets back on the stand tomorrow, there will be another hearing on Whether Trump violated his gag order. Again, he was just found to be in Contempt Of Court and find 9,000 for violating the order. Nine different times. The judge and his funding warned that trump could go to jail if he continues to Attack Witnesses and jurors. Trump to and comment on either today, though he did attack President Biden and take credit for restricting Abortion Rights and also, he waited in on the nationwide protests that we are seeing on College Campuses radical extremists and farleft agitators are terrorizing College Campuses. When you see that video of Raging Lunar Texan hamas sympathizers at columbia and other colleges. Now, but when you look at it, i said, did these people come from . Where did they come from and they do come from other countries and they are paid i should note that we have not seen any evidence that protesters are being paid to be on these campuses but while trump was in wisconsin today, he also addressed the question, they open one of who he is considering to be his running mate come november whos ensure, lets doug burgum, tulsi gabbard. Who are you looking at . I mean, all good names were speaking before. All good names, we have article rubio, marcos great. I think hes been great if you want of your tops well hes one of the people i respect my source tonight is also a top contender to be Donald TrumpsVice President ial pick, republican senator of ohio, j. D. Vance vance. Thank you for being here on just what were seeing on College Campuses. Youve been very outspoken about the need for free speech on College Campuses. But i wonder where you believe the line is in defending free speech and denouncing hate speech yeah. Katelyn, the width, right . Think about it. Is that you have a right to free speech. People allowed to speak. But you dont have a right to turn College Campuses in the Garbage Dumps. You dont have a right to prevent other students from ban in class and you dont have the right to commit violence. And so i think its pretty straightforward. Were never going to strike that balance perfectly, but theres clearly, i think an effort in this country to make sure that we have a First Amendment right to speech and at the same time we make sure that students can go to School Without without attacks and sorry, theres a weird echo okay. Maybe its mixed minus. Well see if the control room can stop that because i know how crazy it is when you can hear yourself. But but on that in your home state of ohio, i know republicans led in passing a law protecting free speech on campuses. We saw that students at your alma mater, were arrested even though the newspaper had described it as is pretty much a quiet, peaceful protests. And i just wonder how you see how administrators are handling whats happening there, whats happening, like what we saw at columbia last night here in new york. Yeah. Kayla, nobodys going to strike this balance perfectly and i appreciate you fixed in the audio issued is fixed, but the base the Base Dick Problem here is that you do have some radicals in these protests were committing violence who are preventing students from going to class. And certainly you dont want to arrest people who are just engaging in basic First Amendment speech. But you also want to make sure that people can go to School Safely and that youll College Campuses, which of course are public spaces are not turned into Garbage Dumps by these so i look, im sure that we can find examples of College Administrators being too aggressive and how they police these things. But i also think you can find some pretty good examples of students who are clearly violating the rights of other students and violating the law by engaging in some of these protests. So weve got to strike that balance. I think thats so so far were doing a pretty good job in this country between letting people express their viewpoint, but not not making sure or i should say, making sure that our jewish students and other students are able to go to class without, without infringement kaitlyn, i come at this from a very proisrael perspective. My view on this is that israels our ally, that we should support them but you cant Police People for being antiisrael are proisrael. You cant Police People for violating the law. We have seen some of that with some of these protests. Okay. So you agree that people who break in and vandalize the building should be prosecuted . Exactly. Okay. Im just checking because you did help raise money for people who did so on january 6, which was impeding an official proceeding, breaking into a building that they werent allowed to be in vandalizing the capital caitlin, i know that this is the obsession of the National Media to talk about what happened two years ago, three years ago on january 6 and just seeing if its a Double Standard, let me know. Let me let me answer the question, caitlin and we look, here. Heres my been my basic argue about january 6. If youd beat up a cop, of course, you deserve to go to prison if you violated the law you should suffer the consequences. But there are people who protested on January The 6th who have had the complete weight of the Justice Department thrown at them. When at worst, theyre accused of misdemeanors. Now again, there are people who are accused of war offenses and thats a problem. But you cant have black lives matter protesters who rioted and vandalized goes free when you have people who were actually peacefully protesting on January The 6th, who have the book thrown at them. Thats the Double Standard that im most worried about yeah. I dont think theres an obsession with january 6, but it is a legitimate question and given what you just said, there, and its trump is getting closer to you as hizon Presumptive Republican nominee. He has said he would pardon lets consider a Blanket Pardon for everyone on january 6, are you saying that that shouldnt happen . People who beat up cops should be excluded from that. Well, i think what President Trump has said, and of course he can speak for himself, but i Pay Attention pretty close attention to what he says and i think what the president has said is that people who have this Double Standard applied to them should be pardoned. You shouldnt have the Department Of Justice letting violent offenders walk scotfree and then you have a Misdemeanor Trespassing Case from January The 6th, that person has their life ruined because of the lawfare, the biden ministration, i think thats a totally reasonable standard for the president to apply. Hopefully he does get reelected. And i think frankly there are some innocent people whove been caught up the lawfare, the Vitamin Distillation donald trump included. If were being honest, but the ones who beat up cops, should they be excluded. Certainly if you assaulted a police officer, you should go to prison. And i think thats a pretty broad and agreed standard cross the political spectrum, at least i hope so. I certainly think then my fellow conservatives agree, okay, well see if trump agrees with that. But back to whats happening on these campuses as this has been such a national story, trump, when he was in new york, compared it to what happened in charlottesville and 2017, obviously when neonazis were chanting jews will not replace us. Three people were killed, 35 were injured trumps said that was a little peanut compared to what were seeing right now. Is that an accurate equivalency and your view will look, i think that what youve seen is nationwide antisemitic protests and number of students who have been assaulted, a number of people who have prevented from exercising their constitutional rights. And i think trump is he often does highlights the really ridiculous lets Double Standards that sometimes exist in this country when you had what was coded as a conservative protest that had a lot of antisemites the entire National Media was preoccupied with it, obsessed with it, i would say when you have a series of very often antisemitic protests all across College Campuses. A number of acts of vandalism im somehow all of a sudden the media doesnt care about it. I think its reasonable for the president to draw attention to that. And i agree with them. But what was happening in charlottesville was one of the largest gatherings of White Nationalist and a decade, obviously, whats happening on these campuses, weve seen how its gotten out of control, but a sensibly there they are protesting the war in gaza. I just im curious why theres a need to compare the two. And if you see it that way well, i dont necessarily think theres a need to compare. In fact, id say that President Trump is one of the few people whos actually condemned to both sides. In other words, he condemned the protest and charlottesville to the extent that it got violent, he also noted, honestly that there were Peaceful Protesters and charlotte lets fill two. Hes also condemned the protests that have broken out across our College Campuses. So again, i think that if you actually look at what President Trump has said hes making a reasonable observation that theres a Ridiculous MediaDouble Standard. But he has i think the courage to condemn acts of antisemitism, whether theyre coming from the perceived right of the received left. I would disagree that its a media Double Standard, but youre a yale educated attorney and i want to get your take on what we saw happen last week. Those immunity arguments before the Supreme Court where trumps team, his attorney argued that a president could order the military to stage a coup and to have their political opponent assassinated and b, immune from prosecution unless this theory that they were impeached and then convicted by the senate. Do you share the view that president s are basically Above The Law look, look, caitlin, i think we do be careful about imputing words into the president s attorneys that they didnt actually say what the presidency what the president s attorneys, so caitlin, to be clear, is that there was a checks and balances system in our constitution. Now some things the president does private acts are liable to criminal penalties, but most of the things that the president doesnt, their official duties. We have a system of impeachment. We have a system of checks and balances. The legislative branch that im a member bro of the Judicial Branch i did not read the president s attorneys is saying that the president could order a coup. The president s attorneys are saying that the constitutional checks and balances system, no node address that problem. I think rights era distinction. But let me stop you right there because i listened to this since john sauer, trumps attorney. And when he was asked by one of the justices if the president could order the military to stage a coup. And what it count as an official act, meaning he couldnt be prosecuted for it. He said it would depend on the circumstances, what circumstances warrant a president ordering the military to stage a coup . Well, first of all, i did say it depends on the circumstances that opens up a whole lot of avenue for contexts there. But more importantly, kaitlan, hes just saying that would count as an official act. There are a number of eight in your view to but can i fit the finish that the answer to the question, caitlin and official act, there are a number of checks and balances in our system theres the impeachment process theres the Budgeting Authority that congress has. There are a number of ways where congress has a check and balance control over the president united states. All hes saying is that the criminal liability procedures that exist in this country dont cover the president s official acts. And by the way, how could anybody disagree with that . Caitlin, should barack obama be prosecuted for killing an american citizen via a drone strike . There are a number of examples in American History where if you apply the standard, the law fair standard of the vitamins ration against donald trump. It would make the presidency impossible to actually execute the law taking Down In The Name Of taking down there, there are political opponent, kaitlan these guys are are really pushing a legal theory that i think would destroy the presidency. Whether democrat or republican was in charge. Well, i dont think jack smiths is running for office, but on what youre saying, youre basically saying that if the president orders the military to stage a coup, you believe the only remediation for that is that he can be impeached or that congress can restrict the budget will kaitlan youre dealing with hypotheticals here that are completely outside the bounds of this particular situation. Donald trump did not order a coup, despite the fact that a lot of media people say that he did on january the 60 encourage people to protest just peacefully. And of course, most people on january 6 did protest peacefully. What im saying is that you have to have some measure of liability for the official acts of presidency of the united states. And the way to create a check and balance on that system is what the constitution prescribes here, you can have prosecutors, many of whom of course course are deeply embedded with the Democratic Party trying to destroy the life of a former president who is now running for president because the