a period of time. but trump is on the ballot. he is still on the ballot. the supreme court unanimously ruled think today that he cannot be removed from the ballot in colorado, really, any other state for that matter. and really what the ballots already printed up and colorado voters along with 15 other states heading to the polls and a few hours from even now on super tuesday, there was really no time to waste all nine justices agreed. >> isn't a >> judicial love story in the making >> you had me at hello. >> god i love that movie >> well, a >> three supreme court justices must have had that movie on the brain today only it wasn't much of a love story and there was no one's screaming about kwon are showing them the money. nope, this time the so-called liberal justices, sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson in a concurring opinion basically told her cat there are colleagues quit while you're ahead, you have them at patchwork. >> see you? i did there. you're waiting for c. rozanna day where you were all trying to you we're leaning into your tv is going how is lara coates going to bring j. maguire back the supreme court >> you're welcome. america. >> well, they agree that there was going to be some chaos if every state gets to decide whether trump can be on the ballot they got to have consistency. that's going to come from congress. they said, not the states. otherwise, you've got this will not a hilou, but patchwork that was as far as they wanted the court to go. but i mean, tell a baby not to cry the rest of them all. but amy coney barrett, that is said, i see your patchwork and i raised you instructions for congress on what they ought to do next. now, we call that legislation, but forgive me for being a little bit cynical here. show me the money figures speaking. you see what happens in the supreme court ponds to congress, right section five of the voting rights act comes to mind as exhibit number a we're waiting for that new pre-clearance formula. right. >> are you >> well-conserved, justice? amy coney, barrett, ape donald trump's third nominee, agreeing that the court went too far, maybe one to stop also at the hello patchwork but also taking time in issue with her liberal colleagues quote saying, in my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up but it's interesting but now is the time to take the temperature down and it politically charged environment. i want to wind now of all times, what were other cases were decided during politically charged times? >> which vigour >> no >> roe v. wade overturning roe v. wade and dobbs decision. >> how about >> heller second amendment case? >> citizens united i guess you had me at a little bit of wusa for a second. >> a different would >> we got to focus on >> wusa? that's the part right. i will rub your ears for a moment here. i want to bring in former law clerk for a supreme court justice, sonia sotomayor, devotee, right and former investigative counsel for the house, january 6 committee. marcus childress. okay. it's super tuesday. you can lose saw are not rub the ears or not. i happen to love a good movie reference so i can tell you it's okay, it's only going to be in there. >> i >> want to begin with you, tiffany, because i have got to go behind the scenes with you for a second and your eyes or are a time when you've already gotten behind the scenes in your mind thinking about this tell me what you think was happening over this past month to get to this place where you've got amy coney barrett had a concurring opinion. sotomayor, kagan, jackson saying here's the rest of it. what was going on? you think? >> i think this is another example of a poison pill created by john roberts snuck into the sweetness of a supposed compromise that turns out to be nothing more than restricting constitutional rights. and you have three liberal justices who called him out on that and said you went much further than you had two. and then amy coney barrett is wagging her finger and chastising a woman of color, justice sotomayor for speaking her mind and essentially telling her now the time where you should sit down and be quiet and turn down the national temperature as if justice barrett's entire existence on the supreme court isn't a reason for the national temperature being elevated in the first instance >> let me pause for a second. let me take all that him marcus >> it's hard to follow it up. what i will say and i want to give justice jackson sat on my er and kagan credit for at least the concurring opinion. i thought that was notable in light of the dc circuit opinion a few weeks ago, right where we have a per curiam unanimous decision and i thought that it was notable that they agree with the outcome and they still shared their philosophy how this case should have been rolled i thought in this dynamic of the election year that that was really important. having heard what you just said as well, that was my big takeaway. >> well, the thing are wagging part of it. i found very interesting. of course, you think about take a temperature down. essentially she was saying, listen it's great, we are unanimous. roberts, i'm sure wanted that did not want to wade into political territorial that they have in the past before he is well aware, tiffany, about the impression people have that they're carrying water for donald trump, whether that's true genuinely or not, the impression can sometimes be king. when you look at that, the supreme court is supposed to resolve an issue to make people finally, have consistency and calm. could that be what she was saying? >> that could be what she was saying, but the crisis of the court's legitimacy is one of their own making right? you have a unanimous judgment by the supreme court of the united states, and we would love to think that this is a legal judgment. it's not influenced by politics, but we can't think that because the supreme court has so bankrupted its legitimacy that there's really nothing left and americans are wondering, is this a political judgment under the guise of a legal opinion? there's? no rate until really be sure given the controversy that the court itself has created. and so i would love to think that this is a unanimous, purely legal opinion, but i don't think that we can have that competence based on what we've seen from the supreme court. >> that's very dangerous as a proposition, right? and the idea of legitimacy of the court precedent exists in way to influence our choices and conduct. >> if you >> believe in the value of that precedent, that was a concern, of course, pre-dobbs decision down in texas at one point in time about sort of thumbing their nose at the court and saying, no, i'm not going to do that. that was a very real risk then. but now is is this the case? that means that there isn't legitimate say, what do you think >> well, i mean, whether i think that's gonna be american people are really decide his legitimacy of this decision here today. but one thing is for sure is that colorado won't be able to disqualify the vulner present from the ballot. i think that's important as we head into this election season. a third is some law now on this issue of whether states can disqualify presidential candidates from the ballot. >> i >> think now requiring congress to have to act, to be able to do so, a good something that we thought about on the committee was in our recommendation, impeachment committee on the january 6 committee was it was part of our recommended nation. was that committees of jurisdiction in congress should look at ways a mechanisms that we can enforce section three of the 14th amendment. i think we believed that former president trump was an insurrectionist and should be disqualified from the ballot. but we also considered that the environment that we're in and that there should be some type of unit the for midi are there may be better if there is some uniformity around the country with how these processes are brought in. the procedures that are used to carry forth this action. >> so here's why i'm uncomforbl idea that we would have an illegitimate supreme court because if you follow this thread and only their decisions that you agree with makes you think okay, they got that right. they must be legitimate invariably, they'll come a time when others will call the decision from the supreme court on either side illegitimate. and then we've got chaos and different way. tiffany, when you hear about the consistency aspect of it the court, they seem to agree on this principle alone about that patchwork aspect of it, right? you had me at the law, you had me at the patchwork because chaos could rein. you're talking about the chaos of the court being illegitimate. but what about the chaos of their really being those different states able to do different things and decide who's on the ballot? >> i absolutely think that as a legitimate concern and had the court stopped there. i think it would have been a decision that could gather some legal consensus. the problem is they went further and what they did was restrict the 14th amendment. and let's be clear, the supreme court as 450 years been acting to restrict the 14th amendment, which was passed after the civil war. the people who drafted section three lived through something horrific. they watched people who were willing to burn this country down, so long as they could rule over the ashes. and so long as black people were not treated as political equals. and that's exactly what happened on january 6, the insurrection is urged to burn this country down to take your country back. so that we are not in an interracial, multiracial democracy is something that's been with us from the beginning and it's exactly what section three was intended to combat. >> you're talking of course, the civil war and it hasn't been used since the 1800s. try to get care better. it's not to be part of the government, but on that point, i mean, just to take it back to the point you were raising marquez on what congress can do, because obviously this supreme court has said so far, look congress, you have to deal with this issue. it's one of your own making deal with it. what do you want this law to be? actually be interpreted as? look, the bureaucracy is slow as molasses, and you have already seen what happens when congress has things punted to them. there's a lot of work to be done to get unity and unanimity in congress when you guys look at congress doing more were you at all optimistic >> i was optimistic that we had a bipartisan committee that even looked into these facts. i know. so give me my dispute. the fact that it wasn't by parcel, ms cheney and mr. kinzinger, i think would argue with you about their conservative roots. and so the fact that you had folks like mr. thompson, mr. raskin, ms cheney? and mr. kinzinger coming into this committee and trying to prevent another insurrection from happening in the future through a legislative purpose that was something that actually inspired me to go into work everyday on the committee. and i think that's a great start for establishing the facts for congress to now pass legislation based on the work that we've already done. the work that every court that's actually looked into these issues has grid width. they've everyone has looked into the facts of january 6, has agreed that it was an insurrection, and that the former president engaged in it. and so now it's punnett back to congress. and just like it was probably not predictable that our committee would come together and produce a type of investigation that we did. i'm hoping that we're wrong about maybe congress now taking action on this moving forward. >> let me ask you hi, good why do you think this supreme court did not delve into the insurrectionist claim? obviously they're not a fact-based trial court. they're not in the business of trying to decide whether or not that's happened. but at some point they know they're going to have to evaluate and the immunity case, whether official acts entailed some of things that are going to be overlapping facts of insurrection is claims why do you think they were so cautious to steer clear here? >> i think it's because of exactly what you said is that they are trying not to act as a fact-finding body. i will note that courts that have looked at the facts i've concluded that he has an insurrection as colorado forgettable. right. >> but the court didn't want to go there. now, you're right they may have to go there when they get to the immunity case. and we'll see what they say there. but i think for now they want it to steer clear of that and that's frankly what we expected them to do given that they'd like to stay away from factual disputes it'd be tough to get to that outer perimeter analysis that looking at what he actually did, former president trump did leading up to january 6. i don't see how the court can say that it's when within his outer perimeter of duties but i'm trying to find 11,700 votes in georgia, right. so they're going to have to either do a very blanket decision about presidential immunity, or get into the facts i'm trying to distinguish what type of conduct is actually permissible. >> you had me at hello >> february, march next, the woman who voted for donald trump, ben tried to get him off colorado's ballot. why she says today's supreme court ruling could be dangerous when, do you know why i selected to crush anyone? >> anyone, who dares insult me or my country shelf feel my gut >> streaming exclusively on max now, at t professionally installed google nest products they're all set on the system. we should go with the >> most trusted name in home security as the intelligence of google, you have a home with no worries brought to you by adt >> okay. >> yeah, we got orders coming. >> starting businesses never easy let's start at eight months pregnant. that's a different story. >> i couldn't slow down. we were starting a business from the ground of people were showing up left and right in our business needs. they chased a car, made it easy when you go for something big like this, your kids see that and they believe they can do the same. >> arena unlimited one point 5% cashback on every purchase for the chase, inc. business card, make more of what's yours >> yeah. introducing nets, plaque psoriasis. >> he >> thinks is flaky red patches are all people see >> oh, tesla is the number one prescribed pills to treat plaque psoriasis. oh, tesla can help you get clears. >> don't >> use a tesla if you're allergic to serious allergic reactions can happen. oh, tesla may cause severe diarrhea nausea, or vomiting. some people taking the tesla had depression, suicidal thoughts, or weight loss, upper respiratory tract infection, and headache may occur >> live in the moment asked your dr. about oh, tesla, when these business owners need cash fast, they turned to bids to credit to fund what's next from >> fitness studios to medical offices and every small business in between. we've got you covered whether you need new equipment, funds to expand or need money to cover unforeseen business expenses, bids to creditors because the trusted partner for your small business funding needs scan the code on your screen now or go too busy to credit.com to apply this to credit funding. what's next >> my name is bryan. how fire and because of tiktok, i have the power to educate people and hopefully save lives. when my son, brian died, and drunk driving accident, i put out a video about it and i tried to stop that young people from drinking and driving. >> no other family has to go through what we did. >> tick tock has the power to change society. now i think that's where the power of tiktok lies. to save one person. that's one more person that continues the world to write >> demand for energy is growing. and so is the need for american oil and natural gas. it's time to turn the lights on america's resources are abundant. our nation is a global leader in reducing emissions shins, and innovators and delivering more energy sources to secure our future. 9.10, americans agree, american oil and natural gas are vital to our economy >> lights >> only at vanguard, you're more than just an investor. you're an owner. >> that means your >> priorities are ours too. our retirement tools that advice can help you leave a legacy for the ones you love. that's the value of ownership >> see idp disrupts cid p derails. >> let's be honest >> sucks but living with cdp doesn't have to. >> when you sign up at shining through cid p.com, you'll find inspiration and real patients stories helpful tips, reliable information, and more the cid p can be tough, but finding hope just got a little easier >> sign up and shiny through cip.com. >> be heard, be hopeful i'm natasha bertrand at the pentagon. and this is cnn >> as you know, there was a unanimous nine to nothing decision all that that worked concurring opinions. it wrote the donald trump could not be removed from the bouton colorado or frankly, any other state for that matter and others have tried. so who better to talk to them? the about this, then one of the plaintiffs in the colorado 14th amendment case, krista khafre joins me now, christa. so good to see you again. we last spoke when they have the oral argument about this very case about a month ago when we were at that point skeptical about how they would rule. now, you know, how they've ruled today. how do you feel about it >> but as you can imagine, i'm feeling disappointed. i think there was a bit of a silver silver lining and that the court did not dispute the finding of the colorado supreme court or the trial court that trump engaged in insurrection. i think that's important. were they i think let us down as a countries that they now are now saying that congress, or at least the majority said congress must make this decision. that is done in the constitution. it's an extra constitutional finding but i tend to agree with the minority in this case. that with it being in the hands of congress, no future in our insurrectionist is going to be held accountable. >> sotomayor kagan and jackson all talked about the idea of self executing provisions of the 14th amendment. and now wind to add another layer on behalf of the quote, unquote majority the ruling was not a part of it. they follow europe precise logic on that point. but how about this? i mean, if donald trump is not successful in colorado when he's on that ballot it's because the voters, right, not the court at that point. so is this a good or bad thing in terms of this notion of political martyrdom. for him to say, well, you took me off the ballot. that's why i may have lost or otherwise well, i think he's going to call himself a martyr no matter what we do. and my concern is that because the court has said in effect, hey, you can be an insurrectionist you can decide, you don't like the boat. you can decide to push a lie and push that lie to the point of fomenting violence. people can attack becker capital. and even if we're not successful in overturning the will of the people, we can run again, who's to say what's gonna happen in this primary, even if he were to lose in the primary, my guess is that he's going to say he one who knows what's gonna happen in the general, if he wins, he's going to say you won. if he loses, he's probably going to say he won there's really no downside to it. >> but what about the concern that the supreme court was ruling on because of jazz luckett, it can't just be colorado or one state in particular, we've got obviously electoral college map. we've got a united states of america. what one state does impacts another, which frankly is true for every race as we're watching, say the general election, you're waiting to see what one state will do in terms of either their delegate count, electoral account, and boats and what happens rest of the nation. but what do you make of that argument? hafter a month or really reflection now, was they raised in the oral argument about colorado trying to get ahead of the nation's skis >> well, you know, i understand that it would be disruptive. i understand that it wouldn't be practical, but the idea that somehow a patchwork of conflicting laws is problematic. it's not what do you think about my butt each each case. so each each state has different laws when it comes let's do mail-in voting when it comes to when you can register, when it comes to other things with regard to voting, there is a patchwork and in the past, these same conservative judges have not had a problem with patchwork of laws, even if they're conflicting, whether it has to do with gay marriage herridge, whether it has to do with abortion, they seem to be okay with a patchwork until they're not very important point because certainly we've had many consequential decisions in recent years from the supreme court and i guess the interpretations in the eye of the judicial beholder. this it's time they have said he remains on the ballot tomorrow. certainly, voters loci whether he should in fact win on that ballot. kristof kfir. thank you so much for joining us. >> thanks. so thanks for having me on and let's hope the voters take seriously what he did on january 6 when they cast their vote >> thank you. >> up next. >> how will this decision by the supreme court play out in the court of public opinion for people who appeared on this show last month for our court of public opinion on this very notion whether trump should not be on the ballot there back tonight, find out what they think. now i am not guilty. >> i am resigning administration officials destroyed my cover. >> politics. we're great power meets questionable decision making. >> and then on faceless from what backroom deals cia secrets, affairs, bribery, corruption, prostitution. >> as someone who >> lives for politics when a major scandal unfolds, i have to >> there's so much more to the store in knighted states of scandal with jake tapper next sunday night on cnn yeah >> keir, >> movement that inspires if you're living with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis or active psoriatic arthritis symptoms can sometimes take you out of the moment now, they're sky rosie so you can show off with clear skin and show it off with sky rizzi you can take each step with 90% clearer skin. and if you have psoriatic arthritis, sky rosie can help me get moving with less joint stiffness, swelling, and fatigue and the sky rizzi is just four doses a year after to starter doses, serious allergic reactions and an increased risk of infections or a lower ability to fight them may occur tell your dr. if you have an infection or symptoms had a vaccine or plan to thanks to sky rizzi, there's nothing. we are skin and less joint pain. and that everything >> your dr. about how sky was he can help with your skin for joint symptoms, learn how abby could help you save to type two diabetes, discover the ozempic tries zone >> i got power of three. >> i learned my >> a1c cd risk and lost some weight in studies, the majority of people reached an a1c under seven and maintained it all under seven. ozempic lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as stroke, heart attack, or death in adults, also with known heart disease. i'm loring my wrist >> adults lost up to 14 pounds. >> he lost weight. i >> was epic, isn't for people with type one diabetes, don't share needles or pens or we use needles, don't take ozempic if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type two or allergic to stop ozempic and get medical help right away. if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction serious side effects may include pancreatitis, gallbladder problems may occur. tell your provider about vision problems are changes taking ozempic with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase low blood sugar risk side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen k when i was your age, we never had anything like this. what? wifi? wifi that works all over the house, even the basement. the basement. so i can finally throw that party... and invite shannon barnes. dream do come true. xfinity gives you reliable wifi with wall-to-wall coverage on all your devices, even when everyone is online. maybe we'll even get married one day. i wonder what i will be doing? probably still living here with mom and dad. fast reliable speeds right where you need them. that's wall-to-wall wifi on the xfinity 10g network. help you feel connected. >> upload your >> logo, or start your design today at custom-make dot com. >> tomorrow, its super tuesday, 16 races, one consequential day. i know when you bring to you like cnn and the best political scene in the business, super tuesday special coverage begins tomorrow at 06:00 p.m. on cnn and streaming on max >> we're back in our court of public opinion, our virtual courtroom where jurors hear legal arguments and weigh in on the big questions of the day, and nothing is bigger tonight, then the supreme court's ruling that donald trump can in fact stay on colorado's primary ballot. boaters in that state going to the polls in a matter of now hours from now, while tonight, it was a little bit different, bringing back the jurors who just about a month ago weighed in on trump's ballot battle do you think that trump should be on the ballot? yes or no? >> no. >> no. >> no >> no. >> oh, that seems hesitant when you talked about maybe you wanted to maybe option as well. when i want to ask those jurors how they feel about the court unanimously ruling to keep trump on a colorado ballot. so welcome back to all of you today a lot has changed since last time we were together. in fact, there has now been a supreme court decision. he remains on the ballot. you all thought that he should be removed after hearing say the station. >> what do you think during number one? >> well, i don't think that he should be on the ballot. i feel that colorado made a good decision and starting this in the first place and i commend them for their efforts even though they have not one. but i feel that them taking him having him be kept on. there's that maybe what is maybe in download line maybe best. i don't know because we don't know how many other states would then follow suit. and then where that would have gone. and i don't know that we should be allowing the states to just decide who's going to be on a ballot, who remains on a ballot, who comes off because then what happens when the people who oppose biden decided? that maybe he had those documents. and so we can take him off of our ballot. >> interesting because the court really followed your logic in the sense of not wanting the patchwork. they thought every state might do things differently. some may be able to have the avenue of going secretary of state's office and asking for this relief. others may have a different thing. you have a patchwork but still do you think they should have done something different? what are your thoughts today >> well, before i didn't think he should be on the ballot, but that was probably wishful thinking on my part. and it's hard to argue with a nine nothing decision. i mean, that's pretty definitive. >> but >> you have to question this is supposed to be very conservative court. well, did this really will follow judicial restraint and strict constructionism in terms of the going beyond that, actually just ruling on the colorado case and going into basically what has to happen to the forest, the 14th amendment. >> a good point because that was what the concurring opinion of justice kagan sort of somebody who of course, when you are excuse me, and also kitanji brown jackson thought that they could have stopped at the argument. i just said a patchwork, but then went beyond to say what the congress could do to now enforce section three being too much, too expansive in that point, what do you think during her three a.m. i agree with the other jurors. i do think that it's disappointing that the dish didn't didn't go another way. but i also understand why because it's not the place of colorado too. i'm trying to do this on a federal level, but also the the congress is not doing it. and so we're still in this, this very precarious position on he's clearly an insurrectionist. they were very clear on not saying that he wasn't an insurrection is but we still have to deal with him on the ballot, which i think is unfortunate. >> and you think a you see them not addressing the insurrection as aspect as well. he they didn't not say he was there could be some room for interpretation there, but on that point, juror number four, they did say, listen, if it was a state issue, then you could await in this is a federal office and that seemed to be part of the difference >> what do you think? >> absolutely. i think that the justices, though i like that my or the jurors disagree politically with the fact that he should be on the ballot. i think they did a good job outlining particularly section three of the 14th amendment, saying that for federal office holders it is a federal issue and not necessarily incumbent upon the states to make that decision. if it was a states issue, will then certainly they would have that right and authority, but it is not. and so i think they did a good job again, outlining section three of that particular part of the 14th amendment did it change for you all i mean, i've heard a lot of commentary today and we were touching on it prior discussions as well about this notion of teflon don. the use of navigating the legal system to try to get a particular result and fending off various attacks there seems to be a thought that is murmuring, that people believed that the court is somehow assisting in his efforts to be slippery. do you see this decision as it reflection of the court's wanting to help trump or is it separate for you during number two? >> i hope they're not trying to help him, but i worry about it and i i think the amenities that decision and when it comes down, even if it comes down and says he doesn't have immunity. if they wait till the very end. a lot of people are going to look at it and, and say, you know, they're they're helping him. i think there's a real danger of the court losing its legitimate legitimacy among awful lot of americans if they haven't already lost do any of you feel less confident in the supreme court's nonpartisan nature, then you used to tell me dram or three yes, absolutely. i think that that especially with all the different cases or the instances with clarence thomas and other supreme court justices. and it's feels like pay for play and it feels like a very political office. and that's not what it was. the intention of from what i understand the founding fathers, what the supreme court is supposedly. and this decision and the other decisions of the last few years definitely. and even how more recently justices have been appointed or not appointed has been very concerning, very before you can do agree? >> yes, absolutely. i mean, the court itself is a political institution. and if you look at most recent the polls, even as recent as last year, when you ranked sort of political and civic institutions, the supreme court is ranked amongst the top as least institutions that the american people now trust. and i think that over time, given the frankly conservative wing of the court and how it has now been stack, i mean, this is a very catholic very evangelical based cord, people see that regardless of one's political ideology, and they began to does have less trust in the institution that is ideally supposed to remain on bias and impartial chair anymore. >> i see you nodding along. i love to hear your take on this and also the fact that justice me, coney barrett team to think and opinion that she wrote a concurrence separate from the other concurring opinion, yet to today, to suggest the supreme court's job is to lower the temperature it's a cool things down. that the fact that there had been unanimity should have been enough for people to feel confident. doesn't sound like here maybe the temperature has been lower, but if it has not why? >> i agree with >> the other jurors in that the temperature has not been lowered. i think that it rises with every time we have to hear from the court and so i think the reason why is because a lot of the reasons that we're already stated is that the supreme court in itself is political really quick down the line. i'm asking we drove number four and beginning is it a do you think it's a good or a bad thing that the former president is now on the ballot for the purposes of democracy, for the purposes of democracy for our federal public, it is on the good thing that states can not necessarily do the patchwork to use a quote from the case today to make there own decisions about who federally is on the ballot, good or bad? >> good good or bad >> good for the immediate term. but depending on the election results in november, we'll see if it's good for or bad for the long-term future of democracy good or bad >> i guess i'm going with good, but i commended the states because this is something that probably should have been handled at a different level at congressional level or or in the courts itself. i mean with him even being able to run in the first place. >> so all of you have a future in congress because there was a good or bad option. we all had a good, but an explanation. thank you so much for all of you though, is bezel. thanks to our jury tonight. if you want to be a juror on the next court of public opinion, get in touch with us by filling out the forum. you can access by scanning the qr code on your screen. or email. laura coates, jury at cnn.com. >> voters in >> 15 states are heading to the polls and just a few hours from now, we'll talk super tuesday next >> we are a young republican i'm ready to grant how do i look >> perfect. >> good boy >> i love the factory smell, smells like jobs let me do my work and be grateful >> sorry >> streaming exclusively on max stand for news about the new sling tv has the same news programming you love starting at $40 a month. it's the same news programming you love starting at $40 a month. that's what i just said, right? it's this less starting at $40 a month. >> every day, more dog people and more vets are deciding it's time for a fresh approach to bet food. they're quitting the kibble and kicking the can and feed her dogs dog food. that's actually well food developed with that, made from real meat and veggies portioned for your dog? in delivered right to your door. >> it's smarter >> healthier, pet food get 50% off your first box at the farmers dog.com slash real food >> pure harvest smart farms in abu dhabi. this technology enabled agribusiness, solving global challenges we're taking proven methods of farming and decoupling the relationship of food production from climate. and instead marrying it to technology, energy and capital sources. >> given in its heritage in farming, great infrastructure to build a company and the ability to attract foreign talent of adobe, maybe a ton of sense for us. our aspiration is that we're accompanying that this country can be proud of >> when moderate to severe ulcerative colitis takes you off course. put in check with your invoke a once-daily pill when i wanted to see results fast, rinvoq delivered rapids symptom relief and helped lead bathroom urgency hey, behind. >> check. >> when you see tried to slow me down, i got lasting steroid free remission with rinvoq check. >> and when you see cause damage, we invoke came through by visibly repairing my colon lining. check rapid symptom relief, lasting steroid free remission. >> i had a chance to visibly repair the colon lining, check check check. >> rinvoq can lower your ability to fight infections, including tb, serious infections, and blood clots, some fatal cancers including lymphoma and skin cancer death, heart attack, stroke in tears stomach or intestines occurred. people 50 and older with at least one heart disease risk factor have higher risks, don't take the allergic to invoke as serious reactions can occur, tell your dr. if you are maybe i'm pregnant. >> what you see a check and keep it there with rainbow. >> ask your gastroenterologist about rinvoq and learn how abby can help you save after last month's massive solar flare added a 25th hour to the day, businesses are wondering what should we do with bacon and eggs 20 5-7, right? >> response from 20% with the additional hour >> with the extra hour, i'm thinking a py power now, let's put it this is going to wreak havoc on overtime approvals >> anything can change the world of work democrats agree. conservative republican steve garvey is the wrong choice for the senate. ...our republican opponent here on this stage has voted for donald trump twice. mr. garvey, you voted for him twice... as your own man, what is your decision? garvey is wrong for california. but garvey's surging in the polls. fox news says garvey would be a boost to republican control of the senate. stop garvey. adam schiff for senate. i'm adam schiff, and i approve this message. you get your competence back, reset your smile, learn more at reset smile.com i'm fred pleitgen in teheran, and this is cnn >> there's the music it super tuesday eve or just a few hours away from the biggest primary day of this entire election cycle. voters and more than a dozen states are will cast their ballot along with it, go a long way in shaping the november election. more than a third of the gop delegates are at stake and it could be the last stand for one, nikki haley so far, it's only 11 primary the dc contest this past weekend enough to get you close to donald trump, who is all but certain to clinch the republican nomination. let's talk about now is saying attributed and new york times journalist lulu garcia-navarro, a lot with republican strategist shermichael singleton, who was deputy staff of housing urban development under donald trump. let's begin with nikki haley, because we know she has decided to stay in it. everyone's waiting for this moment in time i am what would happen after tomorrow's, so i guess wednesday morning a big thing less than what she has said about sang in the race now >> while we've said as long as we're competitive, we have been intense states just in the past week, i just finished a rally here in houston, texas. we had well over 1,000 people show up and these are people this isn't an anti-trump movement. this is a pro-america movement >> so that's interesting, as long as we're competitive number one, but what i heard at the end, they're not an anti-trump movement. >> that's interesting is interesting because a lot of the never trumpers are embracing her, but she's making it clear by movement. my candidacy is not about being anti-trump she's made it clear that she believes that president biden is a bigger threat than donald trump, which is why i believe lulu at some point she's going to endorse him, but it's interesting that she said as long as she's competitive, i mean, are we redefining what the word competitiveness mean? literally you are right or please tell me if i'm missing something here. >> i don't think you're missing something here. i think nikki haley is trying to threaten a needle which is to say, hey, y'all who want trump, who like trump. i am also a viable candidate. you can come to me. i still think that the democrats are the real problem here and president joe biden is the real problem here. she is making this dance and she has been making the stand since the beginning. and it's a dance that frankly is then going to go to broadway. i mean, this is, this is i hate to break broadway way out there, but it's not going to it's not going to hit the big time. >> and i mean, he calls her birdbrain. >> it is she says >> this at this point in time. >> are those >> voters who are supporting trump? >> i'm going to >> hear her say now, it's not a never trumper campaign and then say, oh, i hadn't realized that leave vote for you. >> interesting, an npr marist poll showcase that 85% of her voter said that they would vote for trump against biden. so my thought process is okay. granted, she's getting 30, 40%. you're talking about them jordi of those folks and go back to trump and then maybe 12% of the never trump was go to biden those aren't substantial numbers. and when you look at how close the race is and are fractured, the president's basis, you do see a potential path for the former president. now it's early, anything could change. but despite all of the negative baggage, the fact that that persists is very telling. let me tell you this poll that came now the new york times sienna college poll, it actually shows nikki haley defeating biden by ten points among registered voters nationally, but no republican has, you know, since 1988 has actually become the republican nominee without winning a majority of the states on super tuesday. look at this little beautiful yearbook photo, lulu. you look at all that's going on. i have to squint my eyes to am i getting old? hold on. >> can you see them there? i see big numbers. i see the yellow whatever. when you look at this more broadly, lulu she doesn't really have a main the path yet. >> she does if she doesn't have the path, i mean, i love that everyone is very excited about making nikki haley happen. democrats want her to continue. obviously, it's good for them if she continues to pummel the president and we continue to talk about the fact that there are these people who don't want donald trump. but i agree they are small part of the party and they're going to come home. this is a highly polarized election. people are going to come home. the problem that the president has, which is a different problem. i mean people might stay home. we are, that is the problem that i see here. it's not whether people are going to vote republican or vote democrat. its people are going to say actually, you know what, i would rather sit this election out, the quote, unquote, uncommitted vote might just be the vote that says, i just am not interested in coming out and voting for joe biden. there may be those two fire >> from the couch who are wondering about biden about his age judi and all of the seeds that have been planted over the last several years about them, listen to what the new yorkers, evan osnos though, had to say an interview he had with president biden on cnn earlier tonight look on a physical level. he is slower, it is movements in his gestures. no question about it. his mind seemed unchanged me, he didn't bungle a date or a name or anything like that. i was looking to see any signs of that so this has a common discussion point that people have obviously trump and biden are around the same age when it comes to age and >> acuity, the stand on biden based on the narratives that have been out there and largely generated in part by donald trump, that seed was planted. and of course, biden has had moments when maybe he is watered that seat a little bit but you hear from people like austin us for example, were saying, i'm looking for it, i'm hearing the narrative. i'm not seeing it does make a difference >> i think it's important that people come out and say, i've interviewed him. he seems well, but this was an article in the new yorker. we didn't hear it. we didn't see it we didn't have the video of it. and joe biden isn't going and taking that message to the people, which is why i think obviously this week is going to be a very important week when he gives his state of the union. people are going to have the opportunity to see him. but the problem i think is is the more people see joe biden the more they think that he is showing his age. i mean, he has a gate that is slow. he has always had a manner of speaking that is halting. and so, you know, people have kind of making their decision and there is this embedded narrative which has been seated in the right that somehow he's sitting there gaga well, people are sort of making decisions for him and he isn't in control. and it's constant there. it's being persistently said, and i have to tell you, i don't see it either. i mean, this has been a successful presidency for many people. he has managed to do many, many things he, is clearly in control of his faculties. and so what this is actually about, i'm not clear because it doesn't speak to what i am seeing. >> it interesting though, you mentioned, we haven't actually seen the interview. we didn't see the special counsel hur's interview. right? yet people were able to make conclusions which tells you a lot about this word shack tesla continues to happen about who your candidate is. hou you want. and when you know johnny appleseeds, a successful man >> testimony is coming up soon before congress. i mean, jon stewart made a good point a couple of weeks back, is that everyone talks about how great the president is and meetings and he's innovative and he's motivated and he's energetic. >> show us no one sees this stuff. when we see the president speaking, it's like god, we love him. he's doing a good job, but man, he appears to bibi and he talks all the time and he does sound unhinged at times. he does not make sense. he makes tons mistake. but because he projects this very orange glow of vitality apparently, people think that that equates to mental acuity orange glow. >> well, first of all, all i i think i use aren't floor on my car actually aren't on the tires thing. but all i heard michael say was he watched john stuart. that's 11:00 on monday nights. laura coates, design. i don't know what that does for >> not there. thank you. so much. shermichael, lulu, come back days after my goal >> for the side, i >> i had university of iowa's caitlin clark breaking it 54 year-old scoring record. what's next for the basketball star plus but that tearful retirement announcement from jason kelce, we've got the sports roundup just a moment >> and he couldn't get out >> vegas was having an identity crisis. that was the beginning of the downfall, but degas, at a different idea vegas story of sensitive. next sunday at ten on cnn. >> washington's proposed capital regulation comes with a steep price tag and they're forcing americans to foot the bill. they're new plan will make loans more expensive, increasing the cost of mortgages and car payments than it will hurt small businesses, making it harder for them to access credit, meet payroll, and run their operations oh, well, budgets are already stretched by inflation and an uncertain economy washington needs to know this capital regulation is another bill that americans can't afford for nearly a decade. i served in the navy supporting seal teams today, i run sabo outdoors with fellow special operations veterans. our mobile app connects customers with a hunting, fishing, and other outdoor experiences american technology has been essential to our growth. but some in washington want to stifle the technology. small businesses like ours depend on this misguided agenda will empower for an hour we're series threatened national security and destroy jobs. are leaders need to strengthen not weaken american technology >> my name is cody archie, and i'm erica and were first-generation ranchers from central texas. and because of tiktok, were able to show people from all over the world where their food and fiber come from. >> we have door per sheep and we have beef cattle for the sole purpose of going into the food chain, we use tiktok as a tool to inform people of what we do and why we do it. there's just a plethora of knowledge and information swapping going on there tiktok has opened us it's protect this way of life for future generation. >> well, my dr. gave me breaths tree for my copd. >> things changed for race >> treaty, better breathing, symptom improvement and reduce flare-ups >> registry what we're playing he's a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. >> it is >> not for asthma. tell your dr. if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it, don't take breaths, train more than prescribed. rush tree may increase your risk of thrush pneumonia and osteoporosis. call your dr. if for some breathing thank chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling, problems, urinating, vision changes, or ipad occur. >> ask your dr. about breaths tree >> the sandals went to boot sale is now on for limited time visit. sanders what calm or call juanita hundred sandals >> the best advice i ever got was to invest with vanguard for my retirement the second-best a healthy enough to enjoy it. so i started preparing physically and financially. been uk came along and made every mile well worth it hi, mom. >> at vanguard, you're more than just an ambassador urine owner helping you prepare for today's launch? her retirement. that's the value of ownership. >> sometimes i imagined what i'd write today for my dear friend martin i'd remind people that all he thrives on one thing silence >> the people who will change the nation are those who speak out, who refused to be bystanders, who raised their voices against injustice. when we stand up to silence we stand up to all hate >> demand for energy is growing and so as the need for american oil and natural gas, it's time to turn the lights on >> america's resources are abundant. our nation is a global we'll leader in reducing emissions and innovators and delivering more energy sources to secure our future. nine in ten americans agree american oil phil, and natural gas are vital to our account >> lights >> so would you get to nashville hot tenders and three mandarin orange tenders? >> what about you? >> three classic tenders? >> for big butterfly srand for over kind. i went, oh, okay >> he said always a competition. >> i am the shra'im but i'm rafael romo at the georgia state capitol in atlanta this is cnn this for a college basketball history >> caitlin clark needing 18 points to be pete maravich's ncw, a scoring records at all? all the way back in 1970, she got 35. that puts her total career points at 3,685. now she wasn't aware if you've got to break the record from she got up to the free throw line, but she knew after everyone screamed, i want to bring in cnn sports analyst, christine brennan. i'm so glad you're here. what a huge moment. she's already declared for wnba draft. >> what a future ad ever. >> oh, without a doubt, already selling out arenas in the wnba season tickets. i mean, this is this is the future for women's basketball. and what a great gift for the wnba, because they need it. the wnba is it's been around for awhile, but women's pro leagues, it takes some time to get them going as we understand, the man had been around a lot longer. and this is exactly what the wnba needs. but first, caitlin clark and iowa of course, will be in the big ten tournament in your hometown of any app? yes, i don't know why we're not going to be there. i ran seriously, we missed an opportunity and then and then the ncaa tournament. and this is going to be probably the most impact. forget the probably laura, the most watched women's college basketball tournament ever, march madness for the women. in fact, i think more people will be doing women's brackets than ever before. they'll still do the man's because that's kind of tradition. but most i talked to people who have no idea who male players are, the college, it's the one and done. so a lot of these, you don't get to know those players as well, but with a women's game right now when you look at obviously south carolina with caitlin clark and iowa, of course lsu, the differential reese, angel reese, who is a compelling figure, will she go to the wnba? i think she probably will. he won't say it he hasn't said yet. unlike clark who wanted to get it done before senior days so that she wasn't the focus on senior day. she wanted everyone to get the spotlight, but for angel reese, i think the question same question. she's got that fifth covid year, that rare opportunity, but my sense would be it's time for angel reese and wouldn't that be fund to have both of them recent clark as rookies? in the wnba this spring and summer, i'll be thrilling to have both of them there. they're often named in the same breath. i do wonder though what's ahead of both women because a lot of people might not like the attention that's coming down from either of the potential rookies and might want to put someone in their place every now and then they're very competitive league. and that can often follow but, you know, who is in a different place right now when that's a little bit more emotional, jason kelce exactly is retiring? yeah >> so this all, brings us here today where i announce that i am retired. well, i announce i'm retiring from the nfl after, 13 seasons with the philadelphia eagles >> wow, he obviously loves the game. >> you know, his brother was there as mom was there. it was that family atmosphere and it was a beautiful speech. people have a chance to go and look online, watch it, read it. it was lovely and there's a lot yet to come for him because he has such a pop i feel or character and how of course, with his brother and with taylor swift and his wife kylie, who's also the kelces. we've gotten to know, then we'll see a lot more of them. >> well, i'm sure at some point in time, once all this attention dies down, i bet the two brothers will converse on the podcast and clown him for crimes as a brother is due, right? christine brennan. thank you so much. thank you all for watching. i'll be on instagram live at the at the laura coates. and if you meant you sure. to tune in, there. our coverage continues tomorrow. >> it's super tuesday, 16 races, one consequential day and no one me bring it to you lake senior and the best political team super tuesday special coverage begins tomorrow at 06:00 p.m. on cnn and streaming on max oh, crap. >> that's a really good gift. >> now, we gotta get france something. >> we could use, these new gift mode. >> yes. >> what are the french like? >> anyone >> cheese >> they like cheese, brilliant. done not? >> do >> default. who don't get new on >> at morgan stanley old school hard work meets bold new thinking to help you see untapped possibilities. and relentlessly work with you to make them real >> so what do you think about these? >> we find this when it's time for an update or complete remodel, rebirth is with you every step of the way where everything down to the front design and products to removal and installation. we handled the entire process to create a beautiful and functional bathroom for whatever your life needs so any your'e turned down amazing >> re back with you. every step of the way. color visit rebuffed.com for your free in-home design consultation >> everyone sees >> meanwhile, at a vrbo when other vacation rentals are just for likes, try one, you'll actually like the edge and rash of moderate to severe eczema disrupts my skin night and day despite treatment it's still not under control. but now i have revoke or invoke is a once-daily pill that reduces the itch and helps clear the rash of eczema fast some are invoked. patients felt significant inch relief as early as two days. some achieved dramatic skin clearance as early as two weeks. and many taking invoke saw clear or almost clear skin. >> we're >> invoke can lower your ability to fight infections, including tb serious infections and blood blood clots, some fatal cancers including lymphomas, skin, heart attack, stroke, and gi tears occurred. people 50 and older with a heart disease risk factor has an increased risk of death, serious allergic reactions can occur tell your dr. if you are may become pregnant help heal your painful skin disrupts the edge and rash of eczema. talk to your daughter? you' whoa, how did you defeat them? with a little kung fu strength and by connecting my devices to the most powerful force of all. skadoosh. hah, huh? cool right? amazing. harness the power of xfinity internet and stay connected to the things you love. ah, they'll be like this for hours.