real cost of legislation is. >> doesn't sound like he's ready to vote yes. i say the president had to know because to be fair, joe manchin, you may not like his position, you may think he is holding up the party, but he's never said anything else in this process. ? fact, manchin didn't get a lot of pushback this time from the progressives. listen. >> the president says he thinks he can get 51 votes for this bill. we're going to trust him. we're tired of just being -- continuing to wait for one or two people. we trust the president that he will get 51 votes for this. and we will pass both bills through the house as soon as we have the final negotiations wrapped up. encourage everybody to keep tempers down. sometimes this happens in final negotiations. >> not really. not within the same party. this is unique to the democrats. now, to be fair, once again, the media loves the hype of deadlines and will it be now and will it be then? the democrats don't have to play int it. and they keep doing it. i see all of the brinksmanship as hype. but the infrastructure and spending bills will pass. it's just about when and how it looks for the democrats. all of the deadline drama is bad for them. and it puts the president in the odd position of touting spending achievements that don't exist yet. he did it in scotland today, playing up $555 million that are in to plan and fight climate change. he called it the, quote, most significant advancement any advanced nation has made. bragging that something is the greatest when it hapt happened yet, makes it sound like the man he apologized for in the subway. >> i should apologize for the last administration pulling out of the paris accords. >> biden is behind the 8 ball, as well. forget the hype. what is the reality of the action this week? let's ask the depptive whipper, ro khanna. good to have you back, sir. >> always great to be on. this week or no? >> most likely this week. but yes. we're going to vote on both bills. there's a lot of good things in there. then, it goes to the senate. i'm convinced it will pass the senate. let's not put an exact date on it. >> you believe it passes the house this week, not necessarily both houses. >> correct. and i believe that the president will deliver the house version with the key priorities. it will have universal preschool. it will have the biggest investment in climate ever. president clinton had almost 57 senators. president obama, 60 senators. biden is doing this with 50 senators. it's a pretty remarkable thing. >> it's not said often enough that having these kinds of thin margins don't make it that easy. and, yes, i was getting beaten up by one of your sisters, by not being fair to the democrats and going after you guys in the process when the numbers are so thin. but you know what? too bad. this is the hand you've been dealt. and you're going to be judged with how efficient you guys are within your ranks. in materials of what happens here, you guys vote yes on infrastructure and yes on spending. it goes to the senate. they vote yes on infrastructure and say, let's send that to biden. but they don't vote yes on spending. >> as soon as we vote yes on in infrastructure, it goes to the president. we're going to vote on the bill without amendment. that's the risk that we vote on that. we vote on the reconciliation bill. it goes to the senate. now, the senate has to act. i'm convinced that the president will ensure that bill passes the senate. if they make any changes, it will be back and forth. but the key commitment that the president has made to us, is that he has the 51 votes for key priorities. and he didn't make that commitment for months. he only made it after he thought he could get the votes. >> if terry mcauliffe loses the governor's race in virginia, is that your fault? >> it's the fault that the entire party couldn't come together quicker. it would have been better if we had the deals done. as a party, we think about how we can be more concerted and act more quickly. i don't think it's one individual's fault. that would be highly unfair, or one caucus' fault. >> a question that if answered honestly, will add more gray hair to your head. do you think that the democratic party would be better served without pelosi and schumer as the leaders? >> no. there's no way that anyone could navigate the slim majorities without these speakers' experience. i will tell you why. i've been in congress for three terms. you know, so many people. biden, schumer, pelosi, they know people with relationships. those relationships matter. are there things that i believe a new generation are better sutded for. when it comes to passing things with a slim majority in washington, they know what they're doing. >> you guys are all talking about taxing the rich. now, i'm hearing that you guys are also planning on fixing -- that word should be in quotes, fixing, the state and local tax deductions, known as salt tax deductions, that trump took away from big states like jersey, california and new york. and the concern is, if you do that, that until the soft taxes will net to neutral the taxes on ? >> we are. it would be capped and it would help the middle class and upper middle class. you can raise tax on people making over 10 million bucks. those are the ones that have the most wealth gain. you don't have to tax the people making $200,000, $250,000, when their much is going to fund public schools and public health. the democrats are for working class, upper class, upper middle class. and we're for taxing the ultrawealthy. >> they prefer to be accurate. the scoring isn't done yet. they need to see what is in the bill. if you do the tax, they say the way it will be anticipated, the scoring agency the people who are measuring the impact of what this bill will be in terms of positive and negative tax burden says if what is planned to be in the bill is in there for the next two years, for those two years, you would not be taxing the rich. you would be giving them a break. >> i don't know how they're defining the rich. millionaires will be taxed. the increase of tax on enforcement. the wealthy will be taxed. the salt deduction should not extend to people making over 2 million bucks. it has to be capped what that deduction is. if we do it that way, we will increase taxes on the ultrawealthy but won't hurt the middle class and upper middle class. that's fair. >> i understand where you're coming from. i'm just saying that you better make sure that's the way it works. otherwise, you know, you will have some explaining to do. if this isn't about having people like me carry their fair share, you guys are going to get beat up on it. another thing, i don't understand, why is it fair to put this at biden's feet? when i was listening to camilla jayapal, he said, we'll get the votes. fine. why is it on him? >> he came to congress and said this is the framework i've negotiated. he's known senator manchin for a long time. he's had hours and hours of conversation with him. i've spoken with senator manchin. i've probably spoken to him for 30 minutes my whole life. he's not going to tell me where his lines are. the president came and said on one point, $7.5 trillion, which is half of what the progressives wanted. on these priorities, i'm convinced i can get senator manchin and 50 senators to vote for it. i believe he can. i believe we will deliver it. it has to be flexible. but here's what people are going to remember. democrats got every kid in this country preschool. democrats got child care covered. democrats made the largest investment in climate. that's what people remember. it won't be what did they say? that is going to be forgotten. >> i don't know about that. >> your show may not. >> your point is well made. in the most recent polling, only 25%, one in four people, think these two bills will help people like them. something in the messaging of this, didn't go right because when these pass, these bills may create over 1 million jobs and help a cut of people in this country that haven't been helped the way these policies are designed to help them since the new deal. and it's interesting. give me an explanation why you think people don't get what the bills can do? we haven't done a good enough job to explain what's in them. it's not the media's job. we should say, this is the biggest assessment for working class people in three decades. they will get a tax cut every month. they will get money back if they're working class, in their taxes from the earned income tax credit. they will have relief for child care. you never have to pay more than 7% of your income. every kid whose 3-year-old or 4-year-old, will get to go to preschool. and by the way, billions of dollars of new jobs in solar, in wind, electric. all over the country, in the heartland and in the south. we need to talk more about that. we haven't done a good enough job doing that. >> ro khanna, always appreciate the candor. welcome on the show. good luck doing the work of the people. >> thank you, chris. ro khanna's right. it may not sound, i'm voting for governor of virginia. gas prices, your home budget. true. everything has been nationalized now. local politics kind of morph into a big battle that everybody is in. a battle of division about what feels right and what feels wrong. and this vote, in virginia, will be the first measurement we see of how this country feels about the new administration. we're going to bring in the wizard of odds in to make the numbers of this point. how it's been nationalized and what people are voting on in virginia. so i only pay for what i need. how about a throwback? you got it. ♪ liberty, liberty - liberty, liberty ♪ uh, i'll settle for something i can dance to. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ ♪ ♪ only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ in 2016, i was working at the amazon warehouse when my brother passed away. and a couple of years later, my mother passed away. after taking care of them, i knew that i really wanted to become a nurse. amazon helped me with training and tuition. today, i'm a medical assistant and i'm studying to become a registered nurse. in filipino: you'll always be in my heart. [uplifting music playing] ♪ i had a dream that someday ♪ ♪ i would just fly, fly away ♪ feel stuck with student loan debt? move to sofi-and feel what it's like to get your money right. ♪ move your student loan debt to sofi—you could save with low rates and no fees. earn a $500 bonus when you refi-and get your money right. why is the virginia governor race so close? terry mcauliffe, glen youngkin. the suburbs are a huge deal there and are breaking blue and they hate trump. let's get some info from the wizard of odds. >> glen youngkin has momentum in the final month of this campaign. a month ago, terry mcauliffe was leading. now, look at it. what do we see? mcauliffe's lead got sliced in half in october. now, youngkin has a one-point lead. that's within the margin of error. but momentum is on his side. if i had to make a prognostication, while it's not a surprise if either candidate would win, i would put more money on glen youngkin at this point. >> why? >> you see that republicans are more likely to turn out than democrats are. republicans are more enthusiastic than democrats. you look at the likely voters among registered voters. among registered voters, terry mcauliffe has a three-point lead. you might make the argument that democrats haven't passed much of anything. i would also point out that this fits a historical pattern. the party out of power tends to have more enthusiasm on its side because they look to punish the party of the president. >> my producer said, the suburbs are breaking blue, did you mean red? i mean blue. that's why biden won. fairfax, loudon, manassas, they went bad on trump, the big swing for biden. why don't we believe that will happen again? and even though the base for trump and all of the smaller counties may go youngkin, he won't make it up in the population centers. >> here's the reason why. there's no slides on this. i'm going to cpontificate a little bit. if you look at white voters with a college degree, donald trump is still unpopular with them. but glen youngkin, what you see is youngkin's net popularity, among white voters with a college degree, is about 15 points higher than donald trump. they're white voters without a college degree. but youngkin has been able to connect or limit the losses with white voters the way donald trump could not. >> you've been analyzing this race as a window into the national picture. we had seen early metrics that people were looking at their vote in virginia through the lens of how they felt about trump or biden. terry mcauliffe seized on this and made this race largely about youngkin being another trump. youngkin went hard on the culture issues. what are they teaching your kids in school. what is going on with the masks? who made the better bet? >> glen youngkin made the better bet. he is closing in the polls. he is tying this to national issues. and joe biden is the president of the united states. if you look at joe biden's popularity in the state of virginia and nationally, what do you see? joe biden's approval rating in the state of virginia is averaging 45%. compare that to his favorable rating on election in 2020, 22%. that's the same trends that besee nationally, right? bide season down to 4%, where on election day, he was at 52%. and this is so important. why does virginia have national implications. you look at the last three cycles, 2009, 2013, and 2017, look at the approval rating of the president there. in all of the cases in the following midterm, they lost house heats. >> they usually lose house seats anyway in the first term. a couple of exceptions to it. it's usually a referendum and the american people like balance. we don't know how that will play out traditionally. i like slide five. i think that it makes a very important point about the true risk for democrats, which is enthusiasm and who is going to come out. explain this. >> this is a poll done by monmouth university, how motivated are you to come out and vote? white voters very motivated to come out in virginia. black voters make 20% of the electorate. terry mcauliffe needs black numbers to turn out tomorrow. turn around that registered voter gap and get it closer to a presidential year electorate. black voters aren't as nearly motivated. that's one thing i want to look at. whether or not the black voters show up in the african-american areas of virginia, like in the southeast part of the state. if they do, terry mcauliffe may win when the polling suggests the opposite. >> that's the one basis i think mcauliffe may be struggling because of his party. i'll tell you, it resonated in italy. the idea of people saying, you democrati. don't make me laugh. >> sorry. why doesn't his party like him? and that's what i don't think democrats picked up in this process. it's demoralizing to a fraction or a slice or however you want to break it up, of people who voted for you, when it seems like you don't want to do what they put you in there to do. and that will be a wake-up call in this election. it has to be close. >> i think that's right. there's a lot of democrats, low enthusiasm, that don't think that the folks in washington have delivered what they wanted to establish. they did not want donald trump in office. not just they wanted trump out, they wanted somebody to do something. we know from the polling over and over again, there's a lot of democrats with this point and feel, that joe biden and the democratic party has not accomplished a great deal. this will keep democrats from home and independent voters turning against the democrats. that was one that went from trump to biden. >> mcauliffe can be hurt by this and the democrats can be okay in the midterms if they pass these two bills and people forget the process. and they do a better job, like a 200% better job selling what is in these bills for people. as we just said in the last segment, a number you know well. only one in four americans believe that these two bills will help people like that. that's bad messaging. how much can the setbacks hurt the biden agenda. we'll bring in the intelligence flying off. it's all comparison because of the meathead in the middle. next. i strip before take-off. breathe right strips open your nose for relief you can feel right away, helping you take in air more easily, wherever you are. why hide your skin if dupixent has your moderate-to-severe eczema, or atopic dermatitis under control? hide our skin? not us. because dupixent targets a root cause of eczema, it helps heal your skin from within, keeping you one step ahead of it. and for kids ages 6 and up, that means clearer skin, and noticeably less itch. hide my skin? not me. by helping to control eczema with dupixent, you can change how their skin looks and feels. and that's the kind of change you notice. hide my skin? not me. don't use if you're allergic to dupixent. serious allergic reactions can occur, including anaphylaxis, which is severe. tell your doctor about new or worsening eye problems, such as eye pain or vision changes, or a parasitic infection. if you take asthma medicines, don't change or stop them without talking to your doctor. when you help heal your skin from within, you can show more with less eczema. talk to your child's eczema specialist about dupixent, a breakthrough eczema treatment. your record label is taking off. but so is your sound engineer. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire the question should be, will the democrats deliver biden a win? now the question has become, can biden deliver the democrats a win? is that fair? jess mcintosh and michael is here to discuss. ordinarily, i would start with you, jess. i'm going to put you on the defensive here. i'm going to start with him. the fact that biden has to find a way to close the deal. they keep setting the deadlines they're not sure they can meet. they have one in four americans delivering in two bills, the most epic policy moves since the new deal. one in four americans think they're good for people like them. what did the democrats do wrong, michael? >> you're not connecting all the dots. >> did you say that to me? every segment, you say that, by the way. you need a new insight. >> i maintain -- it's not an insult. i just want to close the loop for you. >> please. >> joe manchin is the same thing to happen to joe biden. i don't believe in the coincidence. you have the nbc survey that has 71% of the country, nearly half of democrats, think we're headed in the wrong direction. here's the abc survey, where 32% of mpluralality say, it's not going to help them. and one day later, they put the brakes on the spending bill. manchin is forcing biden to take a win for the $1.2 trillion because they so poorly sold the bigger bill. that's what's going on. >> do you think that the house will allow -- they will get a little trapped here, right? if the house votes for the infrastructure bill that has passed the senate without amendments will become law. and what happens then? >> i think at this point, everybody has worked too hard and come too close to meet to let this go. so, if the house decides to vote on the infrastructure package, they believe that the second bill, the social bill, is secure. i'm not going to be too concerned if i see that happening. this has been a really long and messy process. but these are the worst hours of trying to pass historic legislation. this will be an outcome story. this will not be a process story. i want people to remember how frustrating it was to pass obamacare and how often it was a failure. and now, it's one of the most powerful social safety net expansions we've seen. in a few years, that's how we'll talk about this. every plank of the agenda right now, is wildly popular. reaching the kind of numbers you can't just get with democrats. it's also republicans and independents. when americans can see what is in the package and hitting their checkbooks, the inboxes, and the ability to take kids to day care and elterly relatives, that's when people think this affects my family. >> why isn't what jess is saying, how it 's been sold all along? >> they try to blame the media for this. the media has been fixated on the bottom line. but the legislators have been f faxuated on the bottom line. it's been a debate about 3.5, 2.0, 1.75. and don't overlook that joe manchin is working on analytics that say it's not $1.75 trillion, it's $3.9 trillion. that analysis is not going to go away. the climate is where americans believe this is all too hurried to spend too much money and there has to be waste baked into it. i don't see this resolving soon. i think bide season going manchin a favor. 19 republicans in the senate, including mitch mcconnell were onboard. joe biden gets a much-needed notch in his belt. >> jess, response? >> i mean, i've seen polls that suggest most americans think this bill is the right size or not big enough. we have to talk about what's in it. and joe manchin knows what's in it. he probably spent more time negotiating this bill than any other single senator. he knows it meets his demands. he was part of the negotiations. and he knows waits for the cbo score is something the senate has to do any way. seems like the press conference didn't do anything to slow down the momentum with other democrats on the hill. it's joe manchin being joe m man manchin. it's hard to make sense unless you assume he loves the attention. in which case, this is a master class how to get it. when i advise candidates, i don't tell them to get not notoriety. he is making his own choice. but this gets done soon. >> word choice will be key here you say notoriety, how does it play for him? notoriety or fame? we'll see. go ahead, jess. go ahead. i cut you off. >> sorry. i was just saying, west virginia needs these packages more than most states. there aren't millionaires in west virginia. i can't believe there's a lot of west virginians cheering for joe manchin taking down programs they need. >> polling shows the same. but sometimes it's more field than fact. that's why trump ran away with that state. last word, michael. >> i think he is asking the question that all americans can understand. can we afford it? how much is it going to cost? >> jess, appreciate you. michael, you connect the dots. how do you like that? you try connecting the dots? i'm kidding. thank you very much. take care. every time he tells me i can't connect the dots. maybe he's right. the supreme court conside ed challenges to the most restrictive abortion law in the country today. and sometimes, this is rare, especially with the supreme court. many say that the law they're looking at violates roe v. wade. many say it was designed to violate roe v. wade. what is unusual, to have supreme court justices seem to signal where their heads are, the way we saw. we have someone who argued before the justices on behalf of reproductive rights in texas. let's get his take on what i think was made frighteningly obvious in court today. next. ♪ look for the bare necessities ♪ ♪ the simple bare necessities ♪ ♪ forget about your worries and your strife ♪ ♪ i mean the bare necessities ♪ ♪ are mother nature's recipes ♪ ♪ that bring the bare necessities of life ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ the bare necessities of life will come to you ♪ they'll come to me! ♪ they'll come to you ♪ all the delivery, no delivery fees. dashpass. the supreme court heard arguments on reproductive rights to come in the last two decades. now, here's the part to pay attention to. two key conservative justices. brett kavanaugh and amy coney barrett. that essentially puts a bounty on doctors. there was a key moment when justice kavanaugh equated the right to reproductive medical care to that of the first and second amendments. listen to this. >> free speech rights. free exercise of religion rights. free second amendment rights. the fear of the brief is that it can be favored in other state that disfavor other constitutional rights. >> mark herron was making the argument for the responses. what did you make? >> i thought it was a spot-on question. we've been saying all along. it's an abortion restriction and the most extreme that we have ever seen. the questions on the supreme court, were not just about abortion. everyone seems to agree this is an unconstitutional law. can a state decide the supreme court's precedence and the bill of rights just don't apply in our state. and the state can nullify a right that's been recognized by the supreme court for 15 years. a mondaymental right by allowing anyone to sue who exercises a right or provides care to allow someone to exercise that right. that doesn't apply just for abortion. it can apply for guns and freedom of religion. every single constitutional right is at stake if texas arguments succeed and the federal courts can't do anything. >> it's not -- it's viability. that's where the mississippi law is going to come. are you hearing from barrett or kavanaugh or any of the others that you take as a signal on the other issue? >> the supreme court is going to hear arguments in dobbs versus jackson williams health organization. mississippi's 15-week abortion ban. in the state of mississippi has asked supreme court to overrule roe and to overrule casey and to allow them to ban abortion outright. the right to abortion is at stake. we haven't heard how the state is going to rule in that case. >> when kavanaugh was talking about, he was saying, we may change the law in the future. what would that mean in terms of everything that has been done while we were waiting in this period before we changed the law. what would that expose people to? >> on one level, you can say, that's an exfacto argument. a point from someone that is a legal scholar. what was that about? >> i think he was honing in on one of the worst provisions of this law, that it's retroactive. if they are relying on injunction and the injunction gets overruled or the law changes, they can face retroactive ability. and it's one of the many, many pernicious things about this law, where texas has created special rules, solely to be able to turn the courts into a weapon, to nullify constitutional rights. there's other things that the justices are concerned about, as well. i'm not trying to read the tea leaves about this question. >> mark herron, thank you very much. and congratulations on facing the court today. >> thanks, chris. >> good luck. ahead, new court filings reveal what trump is trying to keep secret from the january 6th committee. you can have any feelings you want about the situation. that's your right. that's also a privilege to have a feeling that is free from fact. people don't hide things they're not worried about. okay? plus, a former homeland security official who says he was ringing every alarm bell he could think of before the insurrection. he sayhe doesn't need the trump documents. he knows what it was about and so should you. next. or crohn's disease, i was there. be right back. but my symptoms were keeping me from where i needed to be. so i talked to my doctor and learned humira is the #1 prescribed biologic for people with uc or crohn's disease. and humira helps people achieve remission that can last, so you can experience few or no symptoms. humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, remission is possible. learn how abbvie could help you save on humira. exploring the heart of historic europe with viking, you'll get closer to iconic landmarks, to local life and legendary treasures as you sail onboard our patented, award-winning viking longships. you'll enjoy many extras, including wi-fi, cultural enrichment from ship to shore and engaging excursions. viking - voted number one river cruise line by condé nast readers. learn more at viking.com. sustainability is essential to creating a better tomorrow. that's why cisco is committed to achieving net zero emissions by 2040. and we believe our smart buildings solutions can help. providing power to reduce emissions, intelligence to eliminate waste, and collaboration tools that help the workplace and the planet. between meeting human needs and a sustainable future, there's a bridge. cisco, the bridge to possible. what is the name of the person who told you to buck president trump's plan and certify the votes? >> james madison. >> former vice president pence a short time ago in iowa vocally defending his role in certifying rather than delegitimizing the election results on january 6. and in a new court filing the national archives revealed for the first time what trump is trying to keep hidden from the january 6th select committee. it is more than 700 pages of files from his closest advisors. visitor records, memos from senior white house staff, handwritten notes, draft documents and call logs with pence, all of which may tell us more about his role in the leadup to the attack. remember, a document can't fail to recall. a document can't take the fifth. a document can't spin what it says. 187 minutes the former president watched these scenes but did nothing. this comes as "the washington post" reports incredible new details about that day and the numerous people who saw the violence coming. how? it was just spontaneous, right? just a couple of cooks online talking about it but they never suspected they'd be that successful, right? right? don l. harvin, the head of intelligence at d.c.'s homeland security office, not only notified multiple agencies about the violent chatter online two days before the attack but he also alerted the city's health department to call up d.c.-area hospitals to prepare for a mass casualty event. empty your emergency rooms, he said. stock up your blood banks. donnell harvin joins me now. it's good to see you, sir. >> thank you, sir. >> what did you know? >> well, it's not what we knew. it's the threat picture that we had seen. and so leading up to january 6th we started seeing a lot of concerning information surrounding the events that were planned. information from particular actors that we hadn't seen before, specifically looking at what we call ttps, tactics, techniques and procedures that indicated they would be intent on performing acts of violence interpersonal violence and possibly even smuggling weapons into the district. >> so how come we weren't more prepared? >> well, you know, like you and other americans, i'm looking forward to seeing the conclusion of multiple investigations into that. i can't speak to why what happened at the capitol actually happened. our job from my team's standpoint was to collect, analyze and disseminate threat information to as many people as possible. that's the role of the fusion center. that's exactly what we did. >> so first, let's get a sense of what it was and then we'll get to what it meant to you. when you look at what you were seeing, do you believe that this was about disparate sets of groups that were just equally pissed off about things or do you believe there was coordination of intent and purpose? >> i think it's a little bit of everything. so we found even leading up to the january 6th, what made us really concerned was we saw a core group or several groups of individuals that were well organized and had articulated specific, as i mentioned before, tactics, techniques and procedures that would bring to bear a lot of violence in our estimation if they came to the district of columbia. using a large amount of people who were there for their first amendment protected activities as shields or even as a force multiplier for their more nefarious activities. >> so do you believe that what happened on that day was a chain of things that couldn't have been anticipated, that the guards kind of let them go because there was too many of them and the capitol police weren't set up for it and people started to enter the capitol but it was benign at first but there were just some bad actors? or do you think it was more intentional than that? >> well, i'll be honest with you. everyone is focusing on january 6th, chris, but the seeds of what happened on january 6th were planted a long time ago and we've seen this fomenting in american society well before january 6th. and i know everyone is focused on january 6th and there will be an autopsy and it's ongoing right now. but while that autopsy is occurring we can't lose sight of the fact that the elements that made january 6th possible are still there in our society. even after january 6th. we started seeing threat information for individuals who didn't go to d.c. who lamented they hadn't been here and had articulated that it would have gone differently had they been here. so there is a lot of people out there, not just who you saw on january 6th, that are of like mind and i think that's probably the broader picture. >> percentage chance do you think it could happen again around another election event? >> you know, i don't predict the future. i will tell you that there are individuals out there who have mobilized from radicalization and they're mobilizing to violence. and those individuals we need to identify and connect with. chris, these aren't some foreign fighters that are coming over to our country to do us harm. >> right. >> these are our neighbors. these are our schoolteachers, bus drivers, first responders. and so we really need to get to the bottom of how people are mobilizing from radicalization into violence and get to the bottom of that. >> you were going to say these are our brothers and sisters. i don't know that we can say that anymore. we're in a weird place in this country. but i'll tell you this. donell harvin, thank you for keeping us safe. >> thank you, chris. >> all right. we'll be right back. why hide your skin if dupixent has your moderate-to-severe eczema or atopic dermatitis under control? hide my skin? not me. by hitting eczema where it counts, dupixent helps heal your skin from within, keeping you one step ahead of eczema. and that means long-lasting clearer skin... and fast itch relief for adults. hide my skin? not me. by helping to control eczema with dupixent, you can show more with less eczema. don't use if you're allergic to dupixent. serious allergic reactions can occur including anaphylaxis, which is severe. tell your doctor about new or worsening eye problems, such as eye pain or vision changes, or a parasitic infection. if you take asthma medicines don't change or stop them without talking to your doctor. when you help heal your skin from within, you can change how your skin looks and feels. and that's the kind of change you notice. talk to your eczema specialist about dupixent, a breakthrough eczema treatment. ♪ limu emu & doug ♪ got a couple of bogeys on your six, limu. they need customized car insurance from liberty mutual so they only pay for what they need. what do you say we see what this bird can do? woooooooooooooo... we are not getting you a helicopter. looks like we're walking, kid. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ moving is a handful. no kidding! fortunately, xfinity makes moving easy. easy? -easy? switch your xfinity services to your new address online in about a minute. that was easy. i know, right? and even save with special offers just for movers. really? yep! so while you handle that, you can keep your internet and all those shows you love, and save money while you're at it with special offers just for movers at xfinity.com/moving. "don lemon tonight" with the big star d lemon now. >> you're back and better than ever. how was your trip? >> it was good. it was good to see the g20, to understand some of the concerns. >> looking back at being out of the country and sort of having an overview of looking at america from the other side, what did you think? >> yeah, and talking to italians about how they see us but also seeing a lot of the echoes of what's going on there. they good a got case of rage against the machine in that society, also. and they are hungry for