Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | com
there for a lot of it there was a judge and he adjudicated a lot of these questions. why do you think he wasn't given a fair process well, i think it's a number of things. >> i think they're from a jury standpoint. and again, let me be clear. i'm not a lawyer. i look at it from in terms of what the jury was given to solve this puzzle. and i think they heard some things that were very prejudicial that had nothing to do with solving the problem of the case at hand. i think there were some things that are considered black letter law or horn book law that's just really not something that is controversial at all that was violated. i think you don't have someone that is considered to be an accomplice in crime that has pled out or made a non-prosecution agreement and allow that information in to