By Andy May In another “How the hell did this paper pass peer-review?” incident we find yet another PNAS absurdity by Daniel Vecellio and colleagues (Link), that is described by a truly awful summary in Science Daily here. The paper tells us, correctly, that any wet-bulb temperature above 35°C is dangerous for humans. This particular

Related Keywords

Wyoming , United States , Houston , Texas , Polecat Bench , Rick Willoughby , Daniel Vecellio , Dopplick Newell , Mark Fisher , Willis Eschenbach , Geophysical Research Letters , Randy May , Science Daily , Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum , Leah Stoke , Questions Concerning , Possible Influence , Mechanisms Regulating Sea Surface Temperatures , Deep Convection , Ocean Surface Temperature Limit Part , Peerreview , Ipnas , Bias , Climate News ,