Hello, welcome to everyone who is with us now. Well, the first most important stage in the big electoral process has been completed, elections to parliament and local councils have taken place, marina aleksandrovna, alex sergeevich, vyacheslav viktorovich, these are also your personal achievements, but i know, i m kind of happy for you, but with on the other hand, i am in no hurry to joyfully congratulate you, for the simple reason that there are very serious tasks ahead, times are extremely difficult, i assume that when you went to parliament 5 years ago, you could somehow imagine how everything will be when the deadline expires. I open, i want to work even better, because i think about what in 5 years and in 10, because i want to always be useful to this country, so i work. Vyacheslav viktorovich, what are you tuning in to . Well, of course, for me, of course, on the one hand, this is a feeling of joy, on the other hand, a sense of responsibility, a very important, responsible stage of activity begins, during which a lot has to be done to maintain peace in the world, improve the lives of our citizens in in general for the Successful Development of our state, so of course its big. And develop further , and it turns out interesting that the calmer our elections, the more irritated the enemy, of course, this means that we need to prepare for the fact that they will somehow try to take revenge, well, of course, that means. We are determined these western centers of power are aimed at shaking up as many countries and states as possible, especially along the perimeter of the Russian Federation, given that we have a union state with the russian the federation, in belarus, this is the preservation of peace in the world, its like an eyesore for these western tycoons, then this is not an exaggeration, of course, i believe that this is absolutely true, this is, unfortunately , the geopolitical situation oleg sergeevich, as an experienced politician, i want to ask you, because its clear that when highlevel leaders make some statements, its important how they say and what they say and. Almost a set of words, because here every shade matters, the president speaks to reporters in sunday at the polling station, when he was asked about the upcoming president ial elections, he said tell them that im coming, this is also a factor of stabilization, of course, i ll tell you that the reaction to this speech by the president was colossal, we saw it everywhere, in every region, in social networks, abroad, and the reaction is absolutely diametrically opposite, if inside. Most belarusians sighed calmly, why . Because the political system is being restructured today, and every belarusian understands this, it is following an evolutionary path, yes, but there are still risks there is also transformation, and the worst thing for any belarusian, thats why the elections went well, that we woke up in the same country, the worst thing is to wake up after the elections in some other country, everything is destroyed, everything is done again, some populist standing there, telling us, we will soon come to a bright future, and. Many generations still remember this gorbachev and yeltsin, this is the first reaction, inside the country, people breathed a sigh of relief, but our enemies abroad, they too died , just a sigh of sadness, because this does not mean that there is no rocking there will be, they just understand perfectly well that in the scenario that the president voiced, it will be much more difficult to shake things up, that is , look, lukashenko has not even said it in one word, in one sentence. Sweden to nato, there were open statements that we would take kaliningrad, ill quote, ill just add, you continue, the lithuanian ambassador to sweden, the former minister of foreign affairs. He really says so, he calls it the neutralization of kaliningrad, he writes after sweden joined the alliance, the baltic sea has become internal to nato, if russia dares to challenge the north atlantic alliance, kaliningrad will be neutralized first, and note that these are the major exercises that began in february of this year, which brings together a huge group of nato forces at the beginning. Preparation for an offensive operation, including remember that the topic of expanding the suwalki corridor was discussed more than once, expansion, it is clear that at the expense of our territory, that is, it is just within the borders of grodno and ivya, but for them the most dangerous thing, of course, they openly discuss this, this is the presence on our territory of Tactical Nuclear weapons, multiple launch rocket systems that have. A large range, look, the minister of defense answers in an interview with the russia24 tv channel, viktor khrenin, says we we wont stand on ceremony. here are two short quotes ukraine has turned its border region into a fortified area, has concentrated an attack force of 112114 thousand people on the border with belarus, and sabotage groups are being sent from ukraine. And this the armed forces of belarus are fully prepared for the development of any situation. Region, for this we have a welltrained army, equipped with the most modern types of weapons, including nuclear weapons. Oleg sergeevich, look, after all, in essence, what is this if not a call for prudence, but they still behave like immortals, i dont know, well, look, it means that nato has another goal, i agree with alexey, but there is also one global goal is to continue to weaken the European Union, they are doing this very well, they they started a war in ukraine and are collecting the cream. In the form of arms sales, at this time europe suffers from economic sanctions and suffers the most, as it suffered before when the americans invaded the middle east, europe received migrants, the americans received oil. What will happen next . They are increasing their power, they are telling, as always, the most aggressive rhetoric is from our baltic neighbors, who shout more than they can do anything, because they dont have a damn thing and wont, but there is one truth, first, no attack on russia. Belarus there will not be a fullscale conflict as long as we have a stable internal political situation in russia belarus, this is impossible, there will be nothing in direct clashes, why is one sarmatian missile, one example, you dont even have to go far, one sarmatian missile with a nuclear charge is amazing the entire territory of france, this is about comrade macron, who says a lot , further means further, that is , there will be no direct clash, everyone will be destroyed, and our minister of defense is very tactful, hints at this diplomatically. That if someone thinks that someone will stand on ceremony with these tank divisions standing on the border with belarus from poland, then there will be no such war, this is not the northern military district, by the way, russian president putin subtly hinted about this, said, in the event of an attack on belarus, it would be tantamount to an attack on russia and a fullscale war, in which nato has no chance, if there were chances, they attacked a long time ago, but the risks are great for one simple reason, they will invest every year. Dependence of belarus on russia, and this would be occupation of our country and war. The people would not have accepted this, they would have gone into the forests , a guerrilla war would have started, we would have fought, and this would have been the plan of the west to get us into a war, thats what we are fighting for today, lets look at another topic, its close to that , what we are talking about, now in paris they discussed the fate of ukraine, at which macron, who until recently considered himself almost the main peacemaker in europe, announced the creation of a coalition to supply kiev with longrange weapons. We are talking, as he said, about deep strikes with medium and longrange missiles and bombs actions, that is, attacks on russian territory. Russia should not and cannot win, macron concluded. This resonated even with individual meeting participants. Slovak Prime MinisterRobert Fitzer said this there was not a single word about peace. Moreover, fitze said that there are already several countries that are ready to send their own soldiers to ukraine, although many immediately denied this. Nato general secretary stoltenberg has so far stated that the alliance has no plan to send its military to ukraine. Who to believe in this case, macron or stoltenberg . Well here you have to believe not in words, but in deeds, i think. On the other hand, the complication means the situation in some way of the Russian Federation, and by involving these countries, there may be some kind of military conflicts, the transfer of weapons, this is what macron is talking about, this all goes in line with overseas interests, which means that they are promoted by the United States america, trying to preserve this unfair unipolar world order, we must be clearly aware of this, but what do you think, this is the reaction of germany, other countries, including stoltenberg, who say no, no, no, we are not going to get along. a few words about those nato plans that were still discussed at the beginning of 2010, that is, we very clearly see that nato at some stage decided, so they decided to take the black sea from the Russian Federation and take the baltic sea, they discussed this back in 2010, and it was just some theory or some. Discussion, but now the situation after the start of the northern military district has not turned in their direction, that is, they did not capture the black sea, as they planned, they didnt get crimea, and russia wasnt cut off from the black sea coast, and now, through drawing finland and sweden into nato, they are actually trying to take revenge, revenge for the black sea, taking away the baltic sea, but we have more than once. Already in our programs they said where this ideology comes from, remember, in 1828, colonel lasley evans, a british, wrote the book transformation of russia, in this book he already wrote in order to deprive the russian empire of the status of a world power, it is necessary to cut it off from seas. Why . Because the sea is a continuation of trade routes. Moreover, in this book he wrote that it is imperative to bomb krasnstatt and. That the topic of sending military personnel to ukraine was discussed in europe, i will quote the press secretary of the russian president peskov if this happens, then we will have to talk not about the probability, but about the inevitability of a direct clash between russia and nato, that is , a signal was also sent, naturally, you know, i also looked at the comments that medvedev gave, he called these statements macron, uncontrolled enuresis , verbal, well, probably yes. A world war, unfortunately, there will be no winners, but within the political forces, they are furious with the statement, so i will now quote a french politician and journalist, an influential person in france, jean luc milanchon, he says so sending troops to ukraine will make us a warring country, a war with russia would be madness, this belligerent verbal escalation of one Nuclear Power against another major Nuclear Power is an irresponsible act, concludes that Parliament Must say no, of course. The time has come to agree on peace in ukraine with mutual security conditions, macron just doesnt hear them, doesnt hear them, because hes a populist, and even this statement of his, its like, you know, he wants to pull back the blanket of himself and become such a mainstream politician in europe, but hes a populist , you understand, in any case, of course, he needs to solve internal problems, there are plenty of them there, except for migrants, the problem with farmers, these yellow vests, but listen. Every meeting, every speech, begins with sovereignty ends with sovereignty. If you are not sovereign, you will fight, if you are not sovereign, you will be robbed, if you are not sovereign, you will kneel and pray. Now to ukraine, look how interesting it turns out, this is connected with what we are discussing now, and about well, the word sovereignty can no longer be applied to ukraine. Unfortunately, thats why we need to look for some other synonym, they have 5 years of zelenskys president ial term expiring in may, one of the main issues that is inside ukraine is being discussed, this is an issue with zelenskys legitimacy, its kind of like martial law, and it can be extended automatically, but not everyone is happy with this option, now a ukrainian political strategist, he concludes that there is a reputational catastrophe for zelensky, the ratings are catastrophic. This certainly suggests that , unfortunately, ukraine is approaching the line beyond which it can simply be liquidated as a state, and those ruling elites who are at the head, yes, that means, who actually led the country to a situation that today there is, they are naturally responsible for this, and i think that on the one hand, people, despite all the propaganda that has been deployed there, they see the results of what is happening, but in fact it turns out that it is going on again, which means the ukrainian counteroffensive is not succeeded, the russian offensive. The search for advancement is carried out, there are no victories, which means that the situation in the country is very difficult, the collapse is in fact and the leader who is at the head of the state, i dont know what he can count on, that means, on the support of some external forces. On the other hand, external forces, the same americans, the british , are obviously, probably, interested in the possible change of the leader of ukraine, to install someone more beneficial to them, who will have more, perhaps some kind of authority, not so lost, yes in the eyes of their own people, therefore, here , of course, this is a sad result of the longterm policy that the ruling ukrainian elites pursued, when they actually began by splitting their people into two parts, supposedly there are, which means some are more correct. Others, who in the east are not quite normal, correct citizens, split their country, plunged it into a military conflict, which means, in fact, resources, the richest country ukraine, this is the richest breadbasket of the soviet union, once was, in the end it turns out that it has come to its collapse, and in fact suffers this catastrophe of statehood, what we have today, in your opinion, is a question of legitimacy, how far it will go, whether this threatens zelensky, well, certainly from my point of view his vision is threatened, quite possibly, this means his loss of power. This means his sad end may even be complete, which means with life he may have known too much, what is happening in ukraine is again sovereignty, and this sovereignty has been lost since the ninetyfirst year, every year one step at a time, today we have arrived at the situation when zelenskys rating, the populations trust, distrust of him does not affect anything in the fate of ukraine, because it is under complete external control, if zelensky has a rating of zero tomorrow, but biden. Will decide and the white house that he still needs to lead ukraine, he will lead ukraine if he has a rating of 50 , figuratively speaking, or 40, but biden will also decide the white house that its time to remove it and change it to a more convenient candidate, which will, as it were, give a new breath of war, then they will do it, thats the problem, its interesting that people, look how interesting it is, in 2004, in 2014, the osce applauded in ukraine. Kiev is a russian city, and from there comes a threat to the existence of the Russian Federation, an international threat, because at least kiev is a city with russian roots; it is controlled by an International Brigade of opponents of russia, led by the United States of america. There is such an opinion too. We understand that the decisionmaking center is not kiev. A few years ago, the president said sit down at the negotiating table, sit down at the negotiating table. why . The outcome is inevitable. The question is how much time will pass and how many people will die. Well, this is now obvious to everyone. Now, if the negotiations had gone well at the beginning of the northern military district, well, that would have been a completely different situation. No matter how many people were kept alive, but today we see how many lie in graves, thats whats scary. And today the president again tells them, if now. And what else will happen to those who are now sitting at the bank and making these decisions . Russia still has 30 of the weapons it has not used. Because we can now perfectly compare how the United States acts in the middle east, simply wiping cities off the face of the earth, and how russia acts . Alexey, yes, here. Probably for comprehensive understanding by our viewers of the situation that is now developing in ukraine in europe itself, we must understand that the west hoped that with such cunning maneuvers, since the twentieth year, maneuvers regarding belarus, an attempt to seize power here, then maneuvers to seize the black sea region , they will be able to achieve theirs. These are the historical goals that everyone has been trying to realize for the last, probably 200250 years, but having started this campaign, they themselves eventually came to a dead end, they realized that they did not have enough resources, they faced with a huge, not just a machine, but a makina in the form of the Russian Federation, including allies, it must be said that there are allies, and the west was faced. With the fact that he does not control the whole world, and the whole world is not subordinate to them, and this is the biggest shock for them. Naturally, in these situations they have only one scenario to further escalate the situation , they are already going allin, in fact, they will either lose or at least win something, but within these elites, the statements that we see, there is definitely an understanding that what if they take another step, such a strategic one, negatively towards russia, then this could end, of course, not, not just in the repartition of ukraine, but in the repartition of all of europe, including, the most important thing to understand, and this is what british analysts say , that it is possible that britain will no longer exist in some format, because the main threat over the past 300 years to the russian empire has come from great britain. There are two very important topics that we all need to focus on today. Attention, stay with us, we will bring you closer viewer to science, how science, and specifically biotechnology, helps turn grain into gold, the product from which amino acids are made, this is our glucose syrup, which bacteria eat and produce amino acids, if so. Its very easy to say, its very simple and the mos