Route, which delhi announced that it would build from the eastern mediterranean, in Southeast Asia, look, but still there are several facts that i want you to comment on, yes, because it raises questions, after all, who benefited from this aggravation, because it turns out, on the one hand, it is obvious that israeli army slept through this attack, and in general those. That they show us, when in reality the soldiers of the israeli army are taken by surprise at fortified bases, to put it mildly, they only have time to put on bulletproof vests, at best , on their tshirts, and they practically do not resist, they are destroyed , literally, says that, in principle , it was suddenly obvious, many say, experts, that it could not have happened without. Betrayal or without some, to put it mildly, moves from within, this is the first question, the second question, you say that for the usa this is true the aggravation was beneficial, yes, so for biden on the eve of the elections, this aggravation will bring points or costs, lets summarize a little, this will at least change the agenda, and if we are talking about the reaction of the israeli state in general. It seems to me that very good sabotage, conspiratorial, agents worked there, why, because on the borders of gaza and israel there is a wall with an alarm system, which turned out to be disabled, so moreover, in order to disable it, you need to have access, which means there is inside the most israeli state today there are agents, just whose ones and here. Another question, lets look at what has happened to the israeli state over the past 3 years, an internal crisis, constant speeches, rallies, protests about disunity, disunity, which means that the internal political confrontation today has begun to play into the hands of the foreign political confrontation, because neither the Intelligence Services nor the army intelligencecounterintelligence worked, they could not prevent or at least warn, the israelis themselves they say that such seizures have never happened in history, this is one moment, the second moment is the unity of the arab world in this situation, that is, here i see that there is a benefit in the redistribution of spheres of influence in the middle east for many, for a huge numbers, players and for the United States of america to prevent the strengthening of china, india, iran, the same thing, and for iran, which wants to demonstrate, firstly, wants to take revenge for what they did to it last year, it is clear which Intelligence Services, yes , there are some drones, mass poisonings in schools, attempts to undermine society on ethnic grounds, on gender grounds, this and discontent in lebanon, we just dont notice it, we dont live by the theme, but lebanon is simply shaken by internal conflicts, and this is hezbollah, these are those who oppose israel, and this again, the question is who owns the dutch heights, this includes syria, which has received blows from israel more than once, which is not. Happy with the position that israel expresses in relation to them, and this is a very multilayered cake. But look, if this link between the usa and ukraine is completed here in our conversation, right . The usa is obviously losing the role of such a global hegemon, it is losing, yes, but at the same time they really want to preserve it, they continue to throw away billions , at least in words, yes, while the draft american budget without assistance to ukraine, well, at least in the amount in which ukraine would like to, and this was very surprising, or at least , alarmed not only zelensky, but even bareel, so in your opinion, what kind of bargaining is this in relation to. Is this only connected with these 30 , which they really lost for a year and a half, well, if we take 10 there, the number of people willing to help ukraine decreases every six months, is this only connected with this . Here, in my opinion, an Important Role is played by the fact that the ukrainian direction, no matter how it is put forward, is not strategic for the usa. The United States does not need a proamerican ukraine, as many may think, the United States, we know the history with afghanistan, with vietnam, the most significant option is when the americans fought in vietnam, when they merged their own allies, it is beneficial for them maximum destruction in ukraine, it is beneficial for them to limit russias geopolitical capabilities through ukraine, take the destroyed ukraine. You are restoring it, this is the second point, and the third point, barel yes, he said such a thing that we wont be able to pay everything, ukraines debts there, its budgetary costs, and why did europe fit in like that, despite its own interests, and the interests of europe there was a Good Relationship with russia and china, the americans played a role ; today they are forcing european businesses to move their production from europe to the United States of america, according to german social studies, which were carried out just a year ago, and then a year ago, 25 of large German Companies had already withdrawn their enterprises from the territory of the European Union. 51 thought about this and planned to do this, that is, by and large, a weak europe, europes dependence on the United States, this is the main interest. Europe as a periphery, use those intellectual, economic, financial, technological resources of europe to strengthen the United States in the most powerful, a powerful fight against china, that is, to concentrate europes resources at home, to take it. To ourselves, turn europe into a mere periphery, entertainment for tourists, but come and see everything there, that is, not independence, but some kind of mercedes bmw will be made in the United States of america, okay, well, look, bloomberg writes that this is the solution , well, at least with a statement about such a decision, yes, a serious blow has been dealt to zelensky, here the hungarians and slovaks are throwing gunpowder, yes, although more precisely. They dont want to push him, by declaring that they will not give any more bullets to zelsky, the party that is extremely critical of ukraine is winning in slovakia. All this, frankly speaking, resembles such a scheme, yes, when initially there are loud statements, we will support, yes, and then you are left alone with your problems, this is the stage of fatigue in your opinion among the european mourners. Yes, this is the topic of ukraine, for europe, in fact, this is an ideologically important topic of the image of the enemy, which is molded from russia, from belarus, such border, in order to keep europe in crisis until ukraine, because lets take germany, probably the most advanced economy and a more or less Stable Society in the European Union, there were elections to the bundestag when this Traffic Light Coalition was formed. Yeah, in these elections the peoples parties, the cdu, the csu and the sdp, together gained about 50 of the votes, and why they were called peoples parties, they always together gained at least a constitutional majority, that is, there is no trust. Forces, to those social institutions that exist, in the name of in order to somehow unite society, it is best to unite, sell just the image of the enemy and fear, this is what is done, therefore europe, or rather their elites, which does not think about european interests, they think about euroatlantic interests, and their home is the plane , between brussels and washington, they are not interested in europe in this regard, their accounts are in the transnational. They dont care whether the german grandmother will receive one pension, or we will raise the retirement age, or we will begin to withdraw part of the pension for some military, there other funds and services, they are not interested in this, but there is another tendency, you noticed about slovakia, and this is only the first elections , to emphasize the curious point that such a special opinion exists and prevails in the societies of the former austriahungary, hungary has been there since the very the first day i was very critical of this whole ukrainian topic, we see a sharp change in opinion in slovakia, and soon there will be the czech republic, soon there will be austria, austria initially went and did enough. There will be even more criticism gradually will be built within the framework of the European Union, such a pragmatic core that understands that we are losing funds, we are losing subjectivity, due to the fact that some, some part of the european bureaucracy, simply for their own benefit, fit into this theme of ukraine, good , then the question is simple, now lets simulate the situation the United States loses interest in ukraine completely if it switches to the middle east, yes, pushes this problem exclusively onto europe. How long will europe deal with the problem of ukraine, even taking into account as you said, the need to have a common enemy, as a means of escaping from ones own social cataclysms, well, this is a rather idealistic option, i think the United States will not completely merge ukraine , but, however, their main task is a war of attrition, the europeans will get the maximum they will hang up all the military costs and expenses that we already have in principle, so that they continue to weaken the russian bear , roughly speaking, and themselves as well, for how long they can do this, they also have a Printing Press called the euro, yes, available the European Bank for reconstruction and development, it is clear that european taxpayers will pay for this, plus, we must not forget, such a monster as the Eastern Partnership and other types of association with the eu, by and large , the system of financial and economic colonization by the European Union of other states, well, this is what it is, this is northern africa, these are some countries of latin america, this is the same one. Georgia, azerbaijan, that is, there are enough certain candidates, donors, cheap labor, how long this will last is a difficult question, this must be taken into account, but i think that they are ready to play until 2028 for sure, why 28, because there will be the next elections in the usa, good answer. When we talk about europes readiness to continue working to exhaust russia, this automatically implies that belarus is partnering with russia, they will work against us, of course, here is the president s visit to a fortified area, one of them, and a conversation on a number of important topics, we have long been accustomed to the fact that our first, he not only. Understands and is well versed in internal external agenda, yes, we often see that his words are prophetic in nature, and the president s warnings, especially addressed to our ardent western partners, yes, we should listen, and listen literally, so lets start with the obvious, here is the situation around the border, yes, we are gone lessons from history, lessons from modern warfare, this was discussed, we are ready to cause unacceptable damage in the event of an attack, this is what lies behind this, once again for our viewers in simple, simple words. We will not give our land to anyone, this is the first point, the second moment, this is that our state is following the path of dialogue and monologue, lets remember with the same poles, yes, when we proposed to conduct joint exercises and how they fidgeted, and then suddenly, the ministry of defense signed a resignation letter, here we are must realize at some point that the modern militaristic bacchanalia of poland, it has two two components, the first component is the election one, the image of the enemy, transporting various kinds of Armored Vehicles throughout poland and demonstrating them to intimidate population, right . Unnecessarily, except for political technology, the second point is something that for some reason we dont talk about much, this is an attempt by the party of law and justice to subordinate the army, to establish a partyocracy, this is a completely special phenomenon, if we talk about poland, which probably doesnt exist anymore nowhere, when the party first took over. Economic production, industrial concerns, that is, it is the party, not the government, the party, namely peace, puts its people on the board of directors of the orlin, on the board of directors groups of manure, kgm, copper these are the largest concerns, leading strategic concerns in poland, this is the first moment, now they are doing this already in the army and using the army for their political purposes, yeah. We are in this situation, thats when the president says we are ready for dialogue, we are not acting as a reaction to something, but strategically, of course, this annoys them, why, because they are trying to violate our borders, by overruns, by flying their own helicopters , lead to some kind of hysterical reaction, which they would use in their information affairs. Things, political technologies, to show that the belarusians, you see, are aggressive, for us they are a source of aggression and a source of danger, we cant act like this , we are not grist for their mill, our grist, this is the first moment, the second moment, im all i still disagree with some experts who say that the americans are aiming at some kind of military escalation, why . In our region in our region, namely, there are different forces in the west, there are forces that, on the contrary , incite, this is what i personally feel the feeling that such a force is very strongly present in the uk, well, they always want to use the wrong hands, for whom maximum escalation is more profitable, but the americans very clearly broke through the nato summit in vilnius, promoting the thesis that nato countries should not be involved in direct confrontation with countries , a, which have Nuclear Weapons and b, on whose territory Nuclear Weapons are located, this is hello to those who said that tactical Nuclear Weapons in belarus do not work, they just started working, initially these statements contradicted logically, not a single Nuclear Country with nuclear potential was attacked directly, as you know, the moment, if we look at how sharply the poles began to change their tactics towards us, instead of installing offensive contingents on the borders, they they actually began to mine the suwalki corridor , that is, the logic of the maginot line, the defensive presence, that is, a drastic change in tactics and strategy, it is clear that this is all being done from political technology, this is their idea of figs among their intellectuals as the main force of the United States of america, as such a trojan horse within the European Union, which a must control berlin, brussels and paris, and b must bear such. The americans also have an ambivalent attitude towards this; there is a polish lobby, it is quite strong. Which really promotes militarization , the sale of weapons, but the sale of weapons is one thing, but the management of american contingents in europe, which, the poles want to promote their deployment on the territory of their state, they have failed in this, americans have two main complaints here, why do we need to transfer the entire infrastructure from germany to poland, when it has already been built since the cold war, there are Nuclear Weapons, the second point is that the americans do not have any confidence in the fact that poland is a projected state, here is an example the same grain conflict with ukraine, yes, yeah, because this embargo was not introduced on september 15 and not in the summer, it was introduced back in march of this year, but for some reason no one spoke about this topic informationally then, in the month of july everyone knew that this Agricultural Coalition that warsaw built against the kiev regime, yes , and their grain, that they will prolong this embargo, but the hysteria all began after september 15, when the deadlines about when it became clear what it would be, but it became so the basis for a big quarrel, this confrontation between poland and ukraine, yes, and which began over grain, at least in the public space, but from this conflict, can we say that the confrontation will increase, namely between poland and ukraine, this is already an escalation, or the situation is negative, but developing in dynamics, but lets look at the reasons. Why is this confrontation, especially public, theatrical, beneficial for zhelensky, why is it beneficial for duda and morovetsky, this is what zelensky is doing, the topic of ukraine is gradually disappearing, it is becoming uninteresting, they want to pull it out of the public sphere, abandon it, what is happening here . Second point, blinkin says that you will not receive help, and this is before all the budget agreements, until you carry out the appropriate reforms and begin anticorruption actions, i let me remind you that in ukraine there is such a unit as the National Anticorruption bureau of ukraine, nabu, which actually acts as. An organ of the United States of america within ukraine, which carries out personnel policy, controls personnel, who decides who is a corrupt official and who is not a corrupt official , the task of the americans is to strengthen this body and actually reduce the kiev regime, which has a completely puppet state, completely maria nechno, in response, what they see in response, and most importantly the influence of pressure on Public Opinion in the west, which zelsky talks about, is also going away, because they are dissatisfied with him in the west, and he begins a new round of hysteria, that look, the poles are traitors, this is a ukrainian case, understandable. What about poland, the ratings of the party of law and justice, to put it mildly, are not great, at the beginning of june 30 , against t