now they are keen to get away from that and _ now they are keen to get away from that and say it was a very different time _ that and say it was a very different time what— that and say it was a very different time. what david said earlier, the point _ time. what david said earlier, the point about integrity and what keir was saying tonight, one problem is that rishi _ was saying tonight, one problem is that rishi sunak came in talking about— that rishi sunak came in talking about integrity and the issue of professionalism when he did his first speech outside number ten. it is very— first speech outside number ten. it is very hard — first speech outside number ten. it is very hard to deliver that. to your— is very hard to deliver that. to your point— is very hard to deliver that. to your point about the newspapers and what they _ your point about the newspapers and what they have focused on, the issue about _ what they have focused on, the issue about integrity across all politicians, it has been hard to hold _ politicians, it has been hard to hold anyone to account. so the promises — hold anyone to account. so the promises they make, it is going to be tough _ promises they make, it is going to be tough for the papers. if you say that newspapers don't matter much, who are _ that newspapers don't matter much, who are the — that newspapers don't matter much, who are the editorials and opinion pieces— who are the editorials and opinion pieces for? — who are the editorials and opinion ieces for? , who are the editorials and opinion pieces for?— who are the editorials and opinion ieces for? , . ., , ., , pieces for? they matter for people like us in the _ pieces for? they matter for people like us in the political— pieces for? they matter for people like us in the political world - like us in the political world because we all talk to each other which affects mood but this may be the last great hurrah. rupert murdoch's lived until her hundreds, so if keir has ten years he could be around until the end of it but maybe this is the last time we talk about this. we may be taking it more seriously than it deserves to be taken. whoever the sun backs it is not going to change a single vote. it has been a difficult relationship between — it has been a difficult relationship between the sun and labour politicians for many years. it is the thing. _ politicians for many years. it is the thing, do you want it or not? it could _ the thing, do you want it or not? it could be _ the thing, do you want it or not? it could be a — the thing, do you want it or not? it could be a poisoned chalice.- could be a poisoned chalice. thank ou ve could be a poisoned chalice. thank you very much- — that's it for tonight. i'm back tomorrow. till then, goodnight. live from london. this is bbc news the leaders of the four biggest political parties in great britain will face questions from a live studio audience tonight, in a live special edition of bbc question time. the tories�* director of campaigning and his wife, a conservative candidate, are being looked into by the gambling commission over an alleged bet relating to the timing of the general election. disappointment for england as denmark cancel out harry kane's opener with the two countries drawing 1—1 at the euros in frankfurt the actor donald sutherland — known for his roles in klute and ordinary people — has died aged 88 after a long illness. hello. the prime minister says he was incredibly angry when he found out about allegations over betting on the date of the general election. rishi sunak called it a really serious matter and said that anyone who is found to have broken the rules should face the full force of the law and would be booted out of the conservative party. it comes after it emerged that the conservative party's director of campaigning and his wife, a tory candidate, are being looked into by the gambling commision. the prime minister was speaking as the leaders of the four main parties faced an evening of tough questions from voters during a live question time grilling in york. our political editor, chris mason is there. familiar music, but no panel tonight. one leader, one after another, facing a live audience for half an hour each. and first, the prime minister asked about the story we brought you throughout the day. aren't the emerging allegations . about betting on the election date the absolute epitome of the lack of ethics that we have had to - tolerate from the conservative party for years and years. _ like you, i was incredibly angry, incredibly angry to learn of these allegations. it is a really serious matter. it is right they are being investigated properly by the relevant law enforcement authority. but you are happy not to suspend them, to let them carry on and go on in the election? obviously, they have not admitted anything, no one is saying a decision has been taken about their guilt or innocence, but you are happy for them to go into the election and represent you and the conservative party? fiona, as you said, these investigations are ongoing, but what i can tell you, if anyone is found to have broken the rules, not only will they face the full consequences of the law, i will make sure they are booted out of the conservative party. and then his idea for young people. national service will be compulsory, the military option will be something people choose to do. how would you make people do it? you have a set of sanctions and incentives. there is all sorts of things that people do across europe, whether that is looking at driving licences, other access to finance, all sorts of other things. access to finance ? so if people don't want to do national service, what, will take their bank cards away? what do you mean? there are lots of different models around europe. they can't get a loan? next, the man who polls suggest is likely to be prime minister two weeks tomorrow, and a sticky wicket over a remark he made five years ago aboutjeremy corbyn. you said he would make a great prime minister, did you mean it? it wasn't a question that really arose because i didn't think we would win the election. we all heard you say he would be a great prime minister and that is your way of telling people here to vote for him. did you not mean it? i was campaigning for the labour party, and i am glad i did. you also campaigned for jeremy corbyn to be prime minister. iwas campaigning for the labour party. i was a labour politician. the audience laughed at his repeated refusal to give a yes or no answer. susan came next. given your severe criticism of the conservatives - on the topic of immigration, do you think it is acceptable| at this point so near the general election for your own party not i to commit to specific targets around this critical topic? _ i will not put an arbitrary figure on it because every single politician who has put a number on it has never met that number. next, scotland's first minister and scottish national party leaderjohn swinney. it has been a bumpy time for the snp, not least the arrest of former leader nicola sturgeon, and the arrest and charging of her husband peter murrell, the snp�*s former chief executive over the party's finances. given the recent scandals and dramas with the snp, how will you differ- from your predecessors| and project confidence? i think the honest answer is we have had a very tough time as a party in the last couple of years and as a consequence of all of those difficulties i am here to lead the scottish national party. the snp say if they win a majority of scottish seats next month that would mean negotiations for a second independence referendum should begin. so... if you do not get the majority of scottish seats at westminster, what does that tell you about your mandate to ask for another referendum? what i want to do during the election campaign is to encourage people to vote for the snp to... so, you're not answering that question. ..enable us to deliver on that policy commitment which is right at the heart of our manifesto. will you answer the question or not? what i am saying is, i want people to vote for the snp. next up, the liberal democrat leader sir ed davey, and alison in the audience was not messing about. are you not going to l bankrupt the country? thank you for your question, alison, the answer is no, and i think our proposals are responsible, they are fully costed. i think other parties, frankly, are not putting the money in we need to rescue our public services. the liberal democrats' record in coalition government still rile some. take this about university tuition fees in england. how can my generation trust you? i understand why your generation lost faith in us. it was a difficult government to be in and we got punished. but politics is not all policies, costings and accountability. my wife, i met her on a liberal democrat housing policy group. a night out, that sounds great. mr romance. two hours, four leaders, and a fortnight to go. that was our political editor chris mason. let's get more on what the leaders had to say — joining me is our political correspondent alex forsyth. she is in york watching what has been going on and alex, not anywhere to hide when there is a full 30 minutes per politician, and you have a very engaged audience will stop. abs, a very engaged audience will stop. full 30 minutes per politician in front of the public, and that is what makes these events so potentially pivot —— pivotal in election campaigns. the public are speaking from their experience, that audience the network incredibly engaged and astute and were holding all of the party leaders to account for the promises made in the past and actions in the past, and quizzing them about the promises they are making now, and when you watch the whole thing, there were sticky moments for each of the party leaders, whether it be ed davey on tuition fees under liberal democrats record as part of the coalition, and rishi sunak and his record in government and can integrity and trust, and keir starmer and whether he shifted the labour party position and whether it wasjohn swinney and his pursuit of independence, tricky moments for each leader but the thing that run through that whole thing that run through that whole thing from the audience was the sense that they just don't thing from the audience was the sense that theyjust don't quite trust the politicians to deliver on what they're saying. there were questions about credibility and trust, and they came out time and time again, and that is why when you put the politicians in front of the public, you get some of these real moments when, you know, they are put on the spot and what they are saying is really challenging. and we got a sense of that tonight.— is really challenging. and we got a sense of that tonight. some of that challen . e sense of that tonight. some of that challenge was _ sense of that tonight. some of that challenge was on _ sense of that tonight. some of that challenge was on yes, _ sense of that tonight. some of that challenge was on yes, that's - sense of that tonight. some of that challenge was on yes, that's fine, l challenge was on yes, that's fine, but how would they afford it? taste but how would they afford it? we heard a but how would they afford it? , heard a lot in the course of the election campaign, claim and counterclaim about the various party plans on tax and spending in particular, and we have had warnings from economic think tanks like the institute for fiscal studies saying that the parties need to be more upfront with the public about some of the trade—offs that are potentially coming down the line if party, which of our party of government, is not successful in the pursuit of economic growth they are all planning. and you get a sense the public have been listening to that, so there were questions about the liberal democrats manifesto being fully costed, how keir starmer under neighbour party would put more money into the nhs and defence etc without putting up taxes on working people as a party said it wouldn't, and with the conservatives, challenges on their record in government up to this point. things like the national service plan, was that the right choice, there were young people in the audience suggested they were not totally enamoured by it, and for the snp, lots of questions about their record on the nhs, in a particular question about if the snp do not get more money for the nhs, how they improve their record question mark it was a sharp audience asking about policy and position and trust in politics, and position and trust in politics, and at this point in the election campaign, where you cannot ask more for that from an event like this, where their real standout moments? if you, rishi sunak having to adjust that story the bbc has been running all day about the gambling commission, but on the whole, the party leaders would walk away from that thinking there were not any major slip—ups, that thinking there were not any majorslip—ups, no that thinking there were not any major slip—ups, no huge mistakes that they try to avoid in events like this, but it was he really shift the dial for any of them? who knows. . ,., , .. , , knows. one final point, because they were not facing _ knows. one final point, because they were not facing the _ knows. one final point, because they were not facing the same _ knows. one final point, because they were not facing the same question i knows. one final point, because they were not facing the same question at the same time, it did mean that this debate could and did go all over the different issues that matter to those in the audience. completely, and i think that _ those in the audience. completely, and i think that is _ those in the audience. completely, and i think that is the _ those in the audience. completely, and i think that is the power - those in the audience. completely, and i think that is the power of - those in the audience. completely, and i think that is the power of an i and i think that is the power of an event like this, when you give the power to the members of the public who acts the party leaders the questions that not only affect them and their lives, which is why we heard people talking from their direct experience, there was someone in the audience who worked in the nhs, as student, and young people asking about things affecting them right now, so they were asking the questions important to them, but was also remarkable was the questions were challenging on particular areas in some cases of weakness for the parties as well, so that is why i say all of the leaders at some point were in a sticky wicket and finding themselves how defend their parties position or record on certain policy areas, which is not where they want to be. what you get during an election campaign is party leaders trying to talk about what they want to talk about, that's kind of how it works, they say to date they want to talk about whatever policy area it may be, this format does not allow that, which is why these events matter in an election campaign, because they give the public the chance to shift the agenda into the territory they think is important and they give the public a chance to really scrutinise the politicians. thank you, alex at the university of york. bbc verify has been fact checking some of the claims made in the debate — let's cross to nick eardley. what have you been looking into, nick was to mark?— what have you been looking into, nick was to mark? there was a lots, we had a team _ nick was to mark? there was a lots, we had a team of— nick was to mark? there was a lots, we had a team of fact _ nick was to mark? there was a lots, we had a team of fact checkers - we had a team of fact checkers working hard to go through it all and build some of the graphics that can help explain it a bit. let me talk you through some. let's start with migration, the labour leader sir keir starmer said that net migration was at a record high. this is people coming into the country with visas, not migrants in small boats, he was slightly wrong on this, if you have a look at this blue figure appear, that is migration, what you want to focus on the green one, that is net migration, the number of people arriving at minus the number of people leaving. that was a record last year, but he does actually come down a bit this year. it is still the second highest on record, so sir keir starmer was not completely wrong about recent trends, but it has come down a bit. the labour leader has also said he would bring levels of net migration down, that is the difference in between people coming in and people leaving, but it's coming in and people leaving, but its importance in context, he's not putting a number on it, and looking at this graphic care, it is widely expected to fall anyway. experts say that this will happen whoever is in power. there are different levels of that forecast, different levels of what net migration might be, but partly because student visas are running out for lots of people who arrived a few years ago, and people leave as a result, is widely expected that net migration will come down anyway. next, let us have a look at rishi sunak. he was grilled at the start of his encounter about the nhs in england and record within times on his watch. he said the waiting list were coming down. well, we have a graphic for that's stopped this is the picture in england. if you have a look here, this is the record high, after rishi sunak becomes prime minister. it is coming down, the within this are coming down from that record high, but if you focus on this bit here, the progress has stalled in the last few months, and really important as well, you notice that if you go along here, waiting lists are still higher than they were when rishi sunak came to power as prime minister. you might�*ve also noticed that he said, and i will read the full quote, there is more money going into the nhs today than there has been in history, and i'm sure it bbc verify after this debate will verify this for you. that was a challenge rishi sunak set and yes we looked into it and yes he is right. this data here is from the health think tank, this year, if you look at that redline here, spending adjusted for prices is set to be more than it has ever been. just a wee bit higher than it was during the pandemic, but when you look at that figure, one thing to bear in mind, the charity, the kings fund has pointed it out, the rate of increase in health spending has slowed down the conservatives in the austerity from 2010 onwards, so that figure could be higher, and it's worth remembering that the population has increased, so most people probably expected to go up a bit. yes, rishi sunak set bbc verify that challenge, we have checked, i should say would are looking to stuff thatjohn swinney said and ed davey said, and we will have more in the morning on bbc breakfast and radio for explain in more about what we have been fact checking for the four of them. it we have been fact checking for the four of them-— we have been fact checking for the four of them. it is rather nice when ou aet four of them. it is rather nice when you get referenced _ four of them. it is rather nice when you get referenced by _ four of them. it is rather nice when you get referenced by the prime i you get referenced by the prime minister and there you are with the graph. has minister and there you are with the rah. �* . minister and there you are with the ”rah, �*, minister and there you are with the urah. m ~' . graph. as i say, we like a challenge. _ graph. as i say, we like a challenge, we _ graph. as i say, we like a challenge, we like - graph. as i say, we like a challenge, we like to - graph. as i say, we like a challenge, we like to go l graph. as i say, we like a - challenge, we like to go away and find out whether what somebody is saying is correct, but it has been a big part of this campaign, there has been a lots of questionable claims and dubious numbers used by both rishi sunak and keir starmer talking about each other�*s plans, so yes, we enjoy a challenge, and we are more than happy to check things out if people want us to.— people want us to. they do, and there's more _ people want us to. they do, and there's more to _ people want us to. they do, and there's more to come, - people want us to. they do, and there's more to come, thank - people want us to. they do, and | there's more to come, thank you nick. joining me now is anna gross, political correspondent for the financial times and kumailjaffer, political correspondent for the daily mail. they have no doubt been glued to these two hours of debate will stop thank you both forjoining us. anna, what are you splashing with tomorrow? taste what are you splashing with tomorrow?— what are you splashing with tomorrow? ~ . ,, ., what are you splashing with tomorrow? ~ . , , . , ., . tomorrow? we are splashing on a story about _ tomorrow? we are splashing on a story about date _ tomorrow? we are splashing on a story about date so _ tomorrow? we are splashing on a story about date so we _ tomorrow? we are splashing on a story about date so we got - tomorrow? we are splashing on a story about date so we got from | story about date so we got from that fear about debts that were taken the day before the election was called, showing that there was a kind of somewhat suspicious surge in the number of bets that took place the day before, and that is based on some kind of information or hunches that people had. it speaks of the wider controversy around the bets that took place based on insider knowledge by members and candidates of the conservative party. for --eole of the conservative party. for people linked _ of the conservative party. for people linked to the prime minister are being looked into, as the phrase goes, into the allegations of bets having been laced, and it might seem inconsequential, but the gambling commission gets involved. yes. commission gets involved. yes, exactl , commission gets involved. yes, exactly. and. — commission gets involved. yes, exactlv. and. it— commission gets involved. yes, exactly, and, it might _ commission gets involved. yes, exactly, and, it might seem - commission gets involved. is: exactly, and, it might seem instant —— inconsequential to some people but it adds to a sense of frustration the public feel about a lack of integrity in politics, and a sense that corruption has been able to infiltrate political classes, and you could seat at the debate this evening, it was the very first question that rishi sunak was asked about. it set the whole thing off, so it was a quite challenging for him to start with, and it sort of remains tone for the rest of the 30 minutes that he was being questioned.— minutes that he was being cuestioned. . . ., , ., questioned. kumail, what are you auoin with questioned. kumail, what are you going with on _ questioned. kumail, what are you going with on your— questioned. kumail, what are you going with on your first _ questioned. kumail, what are you going with on your first page - questioned. kumail, what are you going with on your first page in i going with on yourfirst page in response to the debate? i{finite response to the debate? quite extraordinary _ response to the debate? quite extraordinary statement - response to the debate? quite extraordinary statement made | response to the debate? quite extraordinary statement made by keir starmer— extraordinary statement made by keir starmer today, jeremy corbyn would be making _ starmer today, jeremy corbyn would be making a better premises than in his opinion — be making a better premises than in his opinion. this is a labour leader was spent much of his time as labour leader— was spent much of his time as labour leader purging left, trying to distance himself from jeremy corbyn, today admitting that he would have made _ today admitting that he would have made it _ today admitting that he would have made it better by minister than the former— made it better by minister than the former prime minister. during the debate _ former prime minister. during the debate as— former prime minister. during the debate as well, he was questioned about— debate as well, he was questioned about his _ debate as well, he was questioned about his statement in 2019 where he claimed _ about his statement in 2019 where he claimed german carbon would make a .reat claimed german carbon would make a great prime _ claimed german carbon would make a great prime minister, and as viewers would _ great prime minister, and as viewers would have _ great prime minister, and as viewers would have seen, he ducked this numerous — would have seen, he ducked this numerous times. a would have seen, he ducked this numerous times.— would have seen, he ducked this numerous times. a big crash there in the background. _ numerous times. a big crash there in the background, hope _ numerous times. a big crash there in the background, hope it's— numerous times. a big crash there in the background, hope it's nothing - the background, hope it's nothing essential, what did you make of this format, anna, we are used to seeing a wide range of politicians on the stage together where they are jockeying for positions, how well do you think this work having 30 minutes for each of them? it you think this work having 30 minutes for each of them? it was interesting. _ minutes for each of them? it was interesting, as _ minutes for each of them? it was interesting, as we _ minutes for each of them? it was interesting, as we were - minutes for each of them? it was interesting, as we were watching | minutes for each of them? it was - interesting, as we were watching the debate closely, you were seeing the evolution of the debate informant in real time through the election campaign, and at the beginning of the campaign, we saw leaders going head—to—head, and i think it was a pretty unanimous feed and across the board from commentators like us that informant did not work very well. it did not allow for much depth and went people were shouting over each other and it was difficult for the audience to take anything meaningful from it, and i think this formant worked a lot better. politicians were given time to meet their responses. sometimes the audience were even able to go back and clarify a point or make a further question. hejust allowed clarify a point or make a further question. he just allowed for a bit more depth to the debate, so yes, i appreciated the formant and at thought fiona bruce that it very well, not only giving people space to ask questions but also sometimes learned up with pertinent questions that challenged the leaders of the parties on points they might have gotten away with otherwise. kumail, 'ust briefl , gotten away with otherwise. kumail, just briefly. you _ gotten away with otherwise. kumail, just briefly, you think _ gotten away with otherwise. kumail, just briefly, you think most - gotten away with otherwise. kumail, just briefly, you think most of - gotten away with otherwise. kumail, just briefly, you think most of the i just briefly, you think most of the politicians despite the fact they were under the spotlight for 30 minutes each, they would have walked away thinking it could have been worse? sorry, anna, ken kumail, hear me. yes, they could've come not worse, or what— yes, they could've come not worse, or what both — yes, they could've come not worse, or what both leaders needed, keir starmer— or what both leaders needed, keir starmer not needed to make a huge ctang _ starmer not needed to make a huge ctang or— starmer not needed to make a huge ctang or to _ starmer not needed to make a huge clang or to potentiallyjeopardise clang or to potentially jeopardise his clang or to potentiallyjeopardise his massive leads that we've seen over the _ his massive leads that we've seen over the last few days and it rishi sunak— over the last few days and it rishi sunak needed to be, i know it's as combative and direct, to extent he would _ combative and direct, to extent he would did, — combative and direct, to extent he would did, and we saw from the audience, — would did, and we saw from the audience, his direct answers were not always— audience, his direct answers were not always appreciated.— audience, his direct answers were not always appreciated. thank you both forjoining — not always appreciated. thank you both forjoining us, _ not always appreciated. thank you both forjoining us, be _ not always appreciated. thank you both forjoining us, be quick- not always appreciated. thank you both forjoining us, be quick or - not always appreciated. thank you | both forjoining us, be quick or you might get wrapped into the washing up. thank you. england have been held to a disappointing draw in their second group stage match against denmark at the euros this afternoon. if england had won — they would have been guaranteed a place in the knock out stages. but the one all draw means they still remain top of group but the 1—1 draw means they still remain top of group and in a strong position to qualify for the last 16. from germany, here's andy swiss. and a warning — his report contains flashing images. hoping to make a splash. england fans soaking up the atmosphere in frankfurt, as thousands descended on the city's main square before heading for the stadium and, they hoped, another victory. after their narrow opening win over serbia, england were up against denmark and the anticipation was deafening. god save the king sung by the watching prince of wales. could england keep their cool? they struggled to keep their feet at first — kyle walker among a host of players sliding around, but soon it was denmark's turn to slip up and midway through the first half, england pounced. and a good chance for kane! a case of captain fantastic, as harry kane sparked euphoria amongst his team—mates and every england fan. could they now kick on? well, not so, as denmark hit back, and how. that's a good effort, it's a wonderful strike! morten hjulmand with a stunner as the danes began to dominate and england began to toil. after a lethargic first half, could they find some spark? now it's foden. off the post. well, phil foden came oh, so close, but the frustration was plain to see. england rang the changes, captain kane replaced by ollie watkins and the substitute almost made an instant impact. but england were still sloppy, sluggish, and in the closing minutes, pierre—emile hojbjerg so nearly made them pay. england held on for a draw butjust listen to those boos. booing. a chorus of disapproval on a grim night for england's players and their manager. clearly not what we would have hoped. there is a huge amount of work, that is evident from the two performances we have given, but we have to stay tight. we understand that people will be disappointed with the performances and rightly so, and we have got to make them better. but faith in england's team and tactics is being sorely tested. i think we've got the talent, i don't think we've got the manager. we have the best attacking players possibly in the whole tournament i and we are not using them well. we are playing too defensive. no initiative, no trying to get on the front foot, just very boring football. england are still top of their group but after this, that may seem about the only positive. andy swiss now it's time for a look at the weather with louise lear. hello there. desired ingredients to make the perfect summer solstice is obviously plenty of sunshine and plenty of warmth — and we had just that on thursday. the question is, will it continue into the weekend? and the answer is, on the whole, yes. warm for many of us with sunny spells, but there will be some rain around in the far west. let's take a look at that arriving in the next few hours. this weather front here, tied into this area of low pressure, will bring a little bit more of a breeze and some showery outbreaks of rain into the northwest, albeit slowly. light winds elsewhere, maybe a little bit of early morning mist, but that will clear away very quickly indeed. a lot of sunshine for east wales, central, southern, and eastern england, along with eastern scotland throughout the day. we will start to gradually see some rain pushing into the isles of scilly and the far tip of cornwall, maybe into south wales, too — but ahead of it with the sunshine, we'll see 23—24 celsius once again. cloudy with some showers, perhaps moving to the isle of man, rain into northern ireland and to northwest scotland by the end of the day, a few showers ahead of it. but parts of eastern scotland, aberdeenshire in particular, may well see 19—20 celsius if you keep the sunshine. now, as we move out of friday into the early hours of saturday morning, that frontal system continues to sink its way steadily eastwards. it will weaken off substantially, but a band of showery rain moving its way across the pennines and down into southeast england, perhaps lingering across the essex and kent coast first thing on saturday morning. with the cloud around, those temperatures will hold up perhaps into double digits for many. we start off on saturday with much of central and eastern england cloudy. still the odd spot or two of showery rain — but that should tend to break up, sunny spells come through. risk of a few showers to the northwest of scotland, but on the whole, not a bad afternoon for many. and temperatures again still responding, ranging from 15—22 celsius. moving out of saturday, into sunday, on the whole, we could chase a little more in the way of cloud around. but this high pressure continues to build in for the early half of next week — and with that south—westerly flow, it will turn increasingly warm and potentially a little more humid, as well. so a good deal of dry, fine weather to start off the week. a little bit of a question mark, really, from wednesday into thursday — it might turn a little bit more unsettled. this is bbc news. we'll have headlines for you at the top of the hour, which is straight after this programme. hello, joe. hello adam. hello laura. hello, joe. hello adam. hello laura. hello. adam. — hello, joe. hello adam. hello laura. hello, adam. would _ hello, joe. hello adam. hello laura. hello, adam. would you _ hello, joe. hello adam. hello laura. hello, adam. would you like - hello, joe. hello adam. hello laura. hello, adam. would you like to - hello, adam. would you like to help me out with — hello, adam. would you like to help me out with naming _ hello, adam. would you like to help me out with naming our _ hello, adam. would you like to help me out with naming our new- me out with naming our new future? you don't even have to ask. just me out with naming our new future? you don't even have to ask.- you don't even have to ask. just one -hone you don't even have to ask. just one hone call you don't even have to ask. just one phone call or — you don't even have to ask. just one phone call or what's _ you don't even have to ask. just one phone call or what's up _ you don't even have to ask. just one phone call or what's up away, - you don't even have to ask. just one phone call or what's up away, any i phone call or what's up away, any time of day. what we thought was, let's track down the newscaster who's got a postal vote, because they won't be in the uk on the 4th ofjuly, find the newscaster who is furthest away from home. kind of like a budget race across the world. that was exactly what i thought, i love that programme. this that was exactly what i thought, i love that programme.— that was exactly what i thought, i love that programme. this short list of names for — love that programme. this short list of names for it _ love that programme. this short list of names for it are, _ love that programme. this short list of names for it are, for— love that programme. this short list of names for it are, for the - love that programme. this short list of names for it are, for the name i love that programme. this short list of names for it are, for the name of| of names for it are, for the name of this feature, adam suggested we call it glow ballot. susan williams said, paul took paul. i think that one works better written down. you pronounce _ works better written down. you pronounce it — works better written down. you pronounce it quite _ works better written down. gm. pronounce it quite well. works better written down. you pronounce it quite well. nick. works better written down. you i pronounce it quite well. nick says, newscaster — pronounce it quite well. nick says, newscaster ways. _ pronounce it quite well. nick says, newscaster ways. i _ pronounce it quite well. nick says, newscaster ways. i like _ pronounce it quite well. nick says, newscaster ways. i like that. - newscaster ways. i like that. patricia says, _ newscaster ways. i like that. patricia says, remoter - newscaster ways. i like that. l patricia says, remoter boater. laughter while you think about what you would like to call it, or may be come up with your own name, we will have this clip from julian who said this was not about where they'll be. i’m was not about where they'll be. i'm contacting you because i think i might— contacting you because i think i might be — contacting you because i think i might be among _ contacting you because i think i might be among the _ contacting you because i think i might be among the farthest i