to take it 6—1. the third set was an absolute nailbiter. swiatek 4—1 down and seemingly out somehow survived breakpoints and even a matchpoint to take the set 7—5. she's now won 16 consecutive singles matches at roland—garros. the dream of achieving three in a row at the french open is alive and well. over on the men's side, carlos alcaraz needed to dig deep to beat inspired qualifierjesper de jong and reach the french open third round. spain's alcaraz looked subdued at times in a 6—3, 6—4, 2—6, 6—2 victory over a player ranked 173 places below him. a rusty performance from the two—time grand slam—winner, who twice had to come from a break down in the fourth set. in the end, though, doing what he had to do. he dominated most of the points in the first set, and i was struggling to get to my good tennis, or the tennis and i was playing in the first and second set. then in the fourth set, i had to fight. i had to overcome the problems that i had much of the time with myself, but really happy that i could get the win in a good way at the end. to golf, and all charges against world—number—one scottie scheffler have been dropped following his arrest at the us pga championship earlier this month. the american was arrested outside valhalla golf club while trying navigate heavy traffic hours before his second round at the tournament. the charges included reckless driving and disregarding traffic signals from an officer. it is obvious he did not do anything wrong, and as i said repeatedly, the more evidence that comes outcome of the more it shows that scott was the victim here. and, you know, ithink everybody sees something like this happen and realises they are one wrong turn or running into the wrong person away from going to jail themselves. it's the final of the europa conference league. olympiakos are trying to become the first greek football side to win a european club competition. they are up against fiorentina. the italian side were runners—up in the competition last year. it's been an end—to—end game in a raucous atmosphere in athens. fiorentina coming closest taking the lead. nikola milenkovic scuffs a shot past the keeperfrom a corner, but var ruled it out for offside. 32 minutes on the clock, still 0—0, though. it's that time of year, the off—season managerial merry—go—round. this one from burnley to bavaria, vincent kompany has been appointed bayern munich head coach on a three—year deal. the former manchester city captain retired from playing in 2020. he moved from anderlecht to manage burnley in 2022 and guided them to promotion to the premier league last year in his first season in charge. the clarets, though, suffered relegation from the top flight in may after finishing 19th. barcelona have confirmed hansi flick as their new manager on a two—year deal. it ends months of uncertainty at the club. the 59—year—old former germany manager takes over from xavi, who was sacked last week. a stunning century from nat sciver—brunt helped england thrash pakistan in the third one—day international at chelmsford. the all—rounder struck an unbeaten 124 to take england to 302—5, and that was always too much for pakistan, who could only reach 124—9. and with captain nida dar unable to bat, they lost by 178 runs. sciver—brunt also picked up two wickets. and that's all the sport for now. back to you. let's bring you some breaking news on the ongoing criminal trial against the former us president donald trump. we show you pictures from the last few moments where we can see mr trump and his entourage returning back to the courtroom. that is because the core is now sitting again. that is after the jury sitting again. that is after the jury sent a note to the judge containing four requests. we can go straight to our correspondent, who is outside the courtroom there in manhattan to explain exactly what is going on. as we know when these kind of cases, it is normal for a going on. as we know when these kind of cases, it is normalfor a jury going on. as we know when these kind of cases, it is normal for a jury to make requests and asked for clarifications. what exactly are they asking for in this case? that's right. it's often a sign of how seriously jurors are that's right. it's often a sign of how seriouslyjurors are taking their responsibility. and they been deliberating for about four hours now, and a short while ago, as you mentioned, a buzzer went off and they had a note for the judge asking for additional pieces of testimony. three of which they want from david pecker it, the former publisher of the tabloid the national enquirer. they want to take a closer look at a meeting that he held with donald trump and michael cohen in august 2015 in trump tower. and exactly what he said in his testimony during that meeting. remember, that meeting was where prosecutors said david pecker said discuss a so—called catch and kill skiing with donald trump's campaign, to buy up and kill negative stories about tromp to help him get into the white house. now they also want to see michael cohen's testimony from that same meeting. perhaps to compare what the two have said. they also want to other pieces from david pecker. a phone call that he had with donald trump and a discussion he had about buying the former playboy model karen mcdougall�*s life rights and ultimately then not selling that to donald trump because of advice from his legal council. so remember, prosecutors had described david pecker and somebody whose testimony was incredibly damaging and stands on its own. this is somebody who was the first witness to speak in this trial and really lay the groundwork for the prosecution's case. so the process now is under way to get the jurors those transcripts and then deliberations will continue. qm. deliberations will continue. 0k, “oininu us deliberations will continue. 0k, joining us live _ deliberations will continue. 0k, joining us live from the courtroom in manhattan, back with you when we get more mellowness but for the moment, thanks. just a reminder, mr trump is facing 3a counts of falsifying business records, allegedly to cover up a hush money payment to the adult film star stormy daniels in the final weeks of the 2016 election. he has denied the allegations from the start. this trial is just one of a number of cases against mr trump. he's also facing probes related to his handling of classified documents, case related to the january 6th storming of the capitol and another connected to the 2020 presidential contest in the state of georgia, as well as a civil case in new york. someone who has been following the trial closely is formal federal prosecutor, and professor at the cardazo school of law, jessica roth. welcome to bbc news. first of all, i'd like to get your reaction to the developments that we have been just been hearing from from my colleague, thatis been hearing from from my colleague, that is that the jury is asking to review some of the testimony again. yes, that's a very interesting development. it does not surprise me the jury— development. it does not surprise me the jury would like to hear it read back— the jury would like to hear it read back of— the jury would like to hear it read back of the — the jury would like to hear it read back of the testimony of david pecker, — back of the testimony of david pecker, who is one of the most important — pecker, who is one of the most important witnesses for the prosecution because he tells the story— prosecution because he tells the story of— prosecution because he tells the story of the so—called catch and kill skiing — story of the so—called catch and kill skiing to prevent stories that were _ kill skiing to prevent stories that were negative for donald trump from coming _ were negative for donald trump from coming to— were negative for donald trump from coming to light in the weeks before the november 2016 election. david pecker_ the november 2016 election. david pecker was a very important and is not only— pecker was a very important and is not only because he tells that story but because he corroborates michael cohen's _ but because he corroborates michael cohen's testimony about that catch and kill_ cohen's testimony about that catch and kill scheme and specifically trump's — and kill scheme and specifically trump's involvement in it. so be critically— trump's involvement in it. so be critically corroborates michael cohen — critically corroborates michael cohen when he says that trump was involved _ cohen when he says that trump was involved in— cohen when he says that trump was involved in that scheme. and unlike micheel— involved in that scheme. and unlike michael cohen, david pecker has far less bias _ michael cohen, david pecker has far less bias against donald trump. he testified _ less bias against donald trump. he testified that he still considers donald — testified that he still considers donald trump a friend. there is far less baggage associated with david pecken _ less baggage associated with david pecker. he may not be a perfect witness, — pecker. he may not be a perfect witness, but again he has far less baggage — witness, but again he has far less baggage than michael cohen, he does not have _ baggage than michael cohen, he does not have prior convictions, he has not have prior convictions, he has not made — not have prior convictions, he has not made inconsistent statements in the past _ not made inconsistent statements in the past and again he still considers donald trump a friend. and this has considers donald trump a friend. this has been considers donald trump a friend. fific this has been quite the considers donald trump a friend. fific this has been quite the trial. 22 witnesses over six weeks, we also heard from the adult film star stormy daniels. we have had mentions of pyjamas and all kinds of things. what is your overall assessment is to wait for those kind of the liberations of how this trial has going for both the prosecution and the defence? i going for both the prosecution and the defence?— the defence? i think the prosecution's _ the defence? i think the prosecution's case - the defence? i think thej prosecution's case came the defence? i think the i prosecution's case came in the defence? i think the - prosecution's case came in well the defence? i think the _ prosecution's case came in well with them _ prosecution's case came in well with them i_ prosecution's case came in well with them i think— prosecution's case came in well with them i think that nelson and the fact that — them i think that nelson and the fact that there were some sordid details _ fact that there were some sordid details primarily through the testimony of stormy daniels that the prosecution by and large checked all the boxes _ prosecution by and large checked all the boxes that it needed to check in terms _ the boxes that it needed to check in terms of— the boxes that it needed to check in terms of the elements of the offence that had _ terms of the elements of the offence that had been charged. the weakest part of— that had been charged. the weakest part of the _ that had been charged. the weakest part of the prosecution's case in my opinion— part of the prosecution's case in my opinion is_ part of the prosecution's case in my opinion is the connection of donald trump _ opinion is the connection of donald trump to— opinion is the connection of donald trump to the falsification of the records — trump to the falsification of the records of— trump to the falsification of the records of the trump organisation, which _ records of the trump organisation, which of— records of the trump organisation, which of course is the heart of this case _ which of course is the heart of this case the — which of course is the heart of this case. the charges are 24 counts of falsification — case. the charges are 24 counts of falsification of business records, so even — falsification of business records, so even if— falsification of business records, so even if the jury finds that trump is involved — so even if the jury finds that trump is involved in the catch and kill scheme — is involved in the catch and kill scheme with stormy daniels and that the payments to kill her story were actually _ the payments to kill her story were actually in — the payments to kill her story were actually in furtherance of his campaign, thejury actually in furtherance of his campaign, the jury still needs to find that— campaign, the jury still needs to find that the business records of the trump — find that the business records of the trump organisation were falsified _ the trump organisation were falsified to conceal that payment to stormy— falsified to conceal that payment to stormy daniels and that trump was dented _ stormy daniels and that trump was dented to _ stormy daniels and that trump was dented to intentionally part of the scheme _ dented to intentionally part of the scheme to falsify the records. and that's— scheme to falsify the records. and that's where michael cohen positive testimony— that's where michael cohen positive testimony is least corroborated by testimony— testimony is least corroborated by testimony of other witnesses. it�*s a testimony of other witnesses. it's a ruestion testimony of other witnesses. it's a question many _ testimony of other witnesses. it's a question many of — testimony of other witnesses. it's a question many of been _ testimony of other witnesses. it�*s —. question many of been asking on bbc news website 0&a that we been running on our lipase today but i'm going to ask you for your assessment of this as well. if donald trump is found guilty, what are the odds that he could end up behind bars? weill. he could end up behind bars? well, most defendants _ he could end up behind bars? well, most defendants committed of the crime _ most defendants committed of the crime that's been charged here would have no— crime that's been charged here would have no prior criminal record, it would _ have no prior criminal record, it would not — have no prior criminal record, it would not be sentenced to prison. although — would not be sentenced to prison. although prison is authorised as a financier. — although prison is authorised as a financier, up to four years imprisonment, that is not eight requires — imprisonment, that is not eight requires an incident fact no prison sentence — requires an incident fact no prison sentence at — requires an incident fact no prison sentence at all is required. and so generativ— sentence at all is required. and so generally speaking somebody in the position— generally speaking somebody in the position of being convicted of this crime _ position of being convicted of this crime was — position of being convicted of this crime was no prior record would not face prison— crime was no prior record would not face prison time with that if that the judge — face prison time with that if that the judge does not have discretion to impose — the judge does not have discretion to impose prison sentence. he could, and so _ to impose prison sentence. he could, and so i _ to impose prison sentence. he could, and so i think— to impose prison sentence. he could, and so i think that we should not predict _ and so i think that we should not predict exactly what is going to happen— predict exactly what is going to happen here. predict exactly what is going to happen here-— predict exactly what is going to hauen here. ., , . happen here. you can never predict with american _ happen here. you can never predict with american politics, _ happen here. you can never predict with american politics, can - happen here. you can never predict with american politics, can we? - with american politics, can we? jessica roth, professor and former federal prosecutor, thank you very much was up if you want to keep getting live updates of what is happening in that courtroom in new york, you can scan the qr code that's on the screen the slimy and that's on the screen the slimy and that will take you to the bbc live page wear out reporters and correspondents in the courtroom are sending regular updates. we will of course have regular updates here on the programme, too. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. now the latest on the war in gaza, and the us has warned israel that it must do more to protect palestinian civilians in gaza and remove "all barriers to the flow of aid". it follows sunday's israeli airstrike on rafah which set a tent camp on fire, killing dozens and injuring many more. israel, a close us ally, said it had targeted hamas militants and had not intended to harm civilians. an emergency security council meeting has been taking place in new york. america's deputy ambassador to the un told the security council today that incidents like sunday's undermined israel's strategic goals. we are heartbroken and horrified by the deaths of dozens of palestinian civilians and the more than 200 individuals who were seriously injured, including children, following an israeli air strike on may 26th. words cannot capture the sense of loss the families whose lives were shattered by this tragic incident feel. for more on this, we can go live to washington enjoying our department correspondent tom bateman. tom, bring us of the day on what the us position is when it comes to what happened in rafah at the weekend and how that changes the dynamic of the us— israeli relationship with? i had us- israeli relationship with? i had a few problems _ us- israeli relationship with? i had a few problems with _ us- israeli relationship with? i had a few problems with the _ us— israeli relationship with? i had a few problems with the sound that we heard _ a few problems with the sound that we heard back in march from president biden you may remember was quite a _ president biden you may remember was quite a significant intervention where — quite a significant intervention where he _ quite a significant intervention where he basically laid out what he said was— where he basically laid out what he said was his redline as he defined it over— said was his redline as he defined it over the — said was his redline as he defined it over the issue of rafah and this was that— it over the issue of rafah and this was that he — it over the issue of rafah and this was that he said that if there was a full-scale _ was that he said that if there was a full—scale offensive by the israelis into the _ full—scale offensive by the israelis into the city that he could not and would _ into the city that he could not and would not — into the city that he could not and would not support it. and that is because — would not support it. and that is because they were at that .1 .4 million — because they were at that .1 .4 million displaced palestinians mostly— million displaced palestinians mostly living in tents there alreadv _ mostly living in tents there already. so as we have seen over recent _ already. so as we have seen over recent weeks, israel moving into rafah, _ recent weeks, israel moving into rafah, then that appalling event of course _ rafah, then that appalling event of course on — rafah, then that appalling event of course on sunday where and israeli air structure — course on sunday where and israeli air structure or the fire that killed — air structure or the fire that killed at— air structure or the fire that killed at least 45 people, burning to their— killed at least 45 people, burning to their death in tents in and encampment there. overthe to their death in tents in and encampment there. over the last couple _ encampment there. over the last couple of— encampment there. over the last couple of days we have seen the us administration asked repeatedly