showers perhaps across the far north—east and temperatures will respond after the chilly start, eight to 11 degrees. the rain is gathering down to the channel isles by the end of the day and to the isles of scilly. that will bring wet weather overnight into the south—west and into south wales. it is this collection of weather fronts that will spill more moisture potentially on sunday, so there is a greater chance of widespread dense fog first thing in the morning. fingers crossed it will lift but it could be a drab and dreary remembrance sunday. more of a breeze in scotland so here it should lift and it will be a quite day. it will stay dry too much of the day. at 11 o'clock in the morning, hopefully dry weather into the north of england. northern ireland and across to wales and the midlands, showery outbreaks of rain. i suspect the cenotaph should stay dry but it will be murky first thing in the morning. the rain will move erotically north and east, turning showery in nature. in terms of the feel of things on sunday, still seven to ii in terms of the feel of things on sunday, still seven to 11 degrees. it turns mild into next week but unfortunately, wet and windy with it. thanks, louise. and that's bbc news at ten. now on bbc one it's time to join the news where you are, but from the ten team it's goodnight. what do the next few days hold for the home secretary? an accommodation with the prime minister and the police, or pushing the pm to the limit and a headline grabbing sacking? cabinet colleagues close ranks and leave the home secretary to protest against tomorrow's pro palestinian march, and make claims of police bias, all on her own. tonight we arejoined by political insiders to ask where this is all leading. also tonight. first minister, have you misled parliament? no, i made that point very, very clearly. miss—steps and mistakes, including over the covid inquiry. how is the snp—led government in scotland going to deal with a resurgent labour vote? and we have a report from the hawaiin island of maui on how decisions by the authorities may have led to the deaths of some of the 99 killed in wildfires there in august. i knew, like, once i saw the road block, this is insane, _ like those people are on the road not because of a trafficjam, but because of one that is created by our authorities. will this be remembered as the week when suella braverman started to play her hand. will this be remembered as the week when suella braverman started to play her hand. if it is, will she shoot pontoon or bust? tonight according to the times, two members of the government threatened to resign if the home secretary is sacked. she has, this afternoon, had a meeting with met commissioner, sir mark rowley, expressing "her full backing for the police in what will be a complex and challenging situation." so how to interpret that move? suella braverman has been building her mood music for a while now. from talking about "a migration hurricane" to the "guardian reading tofu eating wokerati," supporting environmental protests, from "catching criminals not policing pronouns," to quipping that "the human rights act should be renamed the criminal rights act." and in a new poll of 2001 people for the daily telegraph, almost three quarters of the tory voters agree with her stance on with her stance on banning the pro—palestinian march. on monday she used twitter, now called x, to welcome the met�*s request that the organisers postpone the march on armistice day, she called the protesters hate marchers, this immediately after her weekend pitch also on x to ban charities from giving tents to the homeless. she called living on the streets intense, a lifestyle choice. —— in tents. on tuesday, the king's speech was rolled out with no mention of tents. late that night the narrative switched to labour, when the opposition front bencher quit his job over keir starmer�*s refusal to back a ceasefire in gaza. but the focus wasn't on labour for long. the next morning, the pm was talking to the met making it clear he would be holding the commissioner accountable for the march. holding the commissioner accountable forthe march-— for the march. my view is these marches are — for the march. my view is these marches are disrespectful- for the march. my view is these marches are disrespectful and l for the march. my view is these i marches are disrespectful and that is what i will be discussing with the police commissioner later today. but then positions seem to soften, until 10pm. at that moment, braverman�*s times article hit. not cleared by downing street. she doubled down on her hate marches narrative and accused the met of playing favourites are. by playing favourites are. by thursday, senior tories were divided. ,, ., �* ., ., , , ., divided. suella braverman seems to be increasing _ divided. suella braverman seems to be increasing the _ divided. suella braverman seems to be increasing the temperature. - divided. suella braverman seems to be increasing the temperature. we l be increasing the temperature. we have to focus on lowering it. i think— have to focus on lowering it. i think that _ have to focus on lowering it. i think that is what we have to focus on doing — think that is what we have to focus on doinu. ~ ., .,, ., ., ., on doing. the met have operational resnonsibility. _ on doing. the met have operational resnonsibility. i— on doing. the met have operational responsibility, i am _ on doing. the met have operational responsibility, i am not— on doing. the met have operational responsibility, i am not interferingl responsibility, i am not interfering in that— responsibility, i am not interfering in that but— responsibility, i am not interfering in that but i— responsibility, i am not interfering in that but i am _ responsibility, i am not interfering in that but i am begging _ responsibility, i am not interfering in that but i am begging think, - in that but i am begging think, think— in that but i am begging think, think again _ think again. so - think again. so where i think again. i so where are think again. - so where are we think again. _ so where are we today? think again. — so where are we today? is suella braverman going to survive this? joe is here. what is the latest.— is here. what is the latest. today kirs , it is here. what is the latest. today kirsty. it kick— is here. what is the latest. today kirsty, it kick confidence - is here. what is the latest. today kirsty, it kick confidence off - kirsty, it kick confidence off with jeremy hunt, the next cabinet minister to distance himself from suella braverman�*s comments not a surprise, we had an update from the police as to their policing operation, double the number of officers on duet the, this exclusion zone round whitehall, 2a hours protection of the cenotaph and restrictions round the israeli embassy. finally significantly we had the meeting between suella braverman and the met commissioner mark rowley, a after that meeting one of her team gave us this source, the home secretary emphasised her full—backing for the police in what will be a complex and challenging situation and expressed confidence any criminality will be dealt with robustly, a source total me tonight this meeting was every detail and the home secretary's comments were not an issue with the met commissioner.— not an issue with the met commissioner. ,, ., ., ., commissioner. so, where are we, what was the situation _ commissioner. so, where are we, what was the situation now _ commissioner. so, where are we, what was the situation now do _ commissioner. so, where are we, what was the situation now do you _ commissioner. so, where are we, what was the situation now do you think? - was the situation now do you think? i think for the home secretary's future that is a decision deferred for rishi sunak. although there are cabinet ministers who think the situation is unsustainable. with the met commissioner. 50. situation is unsustainable. with the met commissioner.— situation is unsustainable. with the met commissioner. so, where are we, what was the — met commissioner. so, where are we, what was the situation _ met commissioner. so, where are we, what was the situation now _ met commissioner. so, where are we, what was the situation now do - met commissioner. so, where are we, what was the situation now do you - what was the situation now do you think? i what was the situation now do you think? ~' what was the situation now do you think? ~ ., ., think? i think for the home secretary's _ think? i think for the home secretary's future - think? i think for the home secretary's future that - think? i think for the home secretary's future that is i think? i think for the home secretary's future that is a | secretary's future that is a decision deferred for rishi sunak. although there are cabinet ministers who think the situation is unsustainable. telling me "you can't keep defying number ten and get away with it. " a senior government source has told me she is going to get fired on monday, i am pretty confident of that, but we should say health warning that is not a view shared across government, there is no confirmation of any changes to the top team nec week. if this week has done anything, think it has revealed clarified, illuminated splits within the conservative party on this sort of issue and language, the big question how significant is support for suella braverman? there are 350 conservative mps, one i think pretty impartial source has total me she has the support of maybe 40, parliamentarians, allies, of the home secretary, i think that number is bigger, maybe 65 plus, we are nowhere near a leadership challenge, but there are those who think whatever the numbers now, those numbers could rise because people will take tory mps aside, point to the poll, point to the prime minister, point kirsty to the clock ticking down to the general election and saying, well, isn't it worth a roll of the dice? jae. election and saying, well, isn't it worth a roll of the dice? joe, thank ou ve worth a roll of the dice? joe, thank you very much _ worth a roll of the dice? joe, thank you very much indeed. _ joining me in the studio, three political commentators — phillip blond, salma shah and sonia sodha. first of all, thank you for coming, this is big events coming up, with tomorrow's march and wednesday the judgement of the supreme court on rwanda, but right now, what do you make of this meeting, between mark rowley and suella braverman today? she is not resiling from wanting the march banned. salma. i she is not resiling from wanting the march banned. salma.— march banned. salma. ithink it is an inevitability _ march banned. salma. ithink it is an inevitability she _ march banned. salma. ithink it is an inevitability she will— march banned. salma. ithink it is an inevitability she will meet - an inevitability she will meet with the met commissioner, and talking through this because it has been so high profile, i think the fact they are had to brief it was a good meeting is interesting, because you would expect that to be quite a good meeting between the home secretary and the person who is leading the met. but clearly, this has been a very difficult episode because in many ways she has challenged the operational independence of the met and that is something that you would have to be incredibly careful not to do, if you were doing thatjob effectively. do, if you were doing that 'ob effectively.�* do, if you were doing that 'ob effectively.- well, h do, if you were doing that job effectively.- well, i. do, if you were doing that job i effectively.- well, i think effectively. philip? well, ithink that the home _ effectively. philip? well, ithink that the home secretary's - effectively. philip? well, i think. that the home secretary's opinion effectively. philip? well, i think- that the home secretary's opinion as to the _ that the home secretary's opinion as to the police operation remains unchanged, i think it is supported by 75e80% of conservative voters. that he _ by 75e80% of conservative voters. that he is — by 75e80% of conservative voters. that he is partial.— that he is partial. yes, i think the evidence is _ that he is partial. yes, i think the evidence is kind _ that he is partial. yes, i think the evidence is kind of, _ that he is partial. yes, i think the evidence is kind of, is _ that he is partial. yes, i think the evidence is kind of, is there, - that he is partial. yes, i think the evidence is kind of, is there, you | evidence is kind of, is there, you can get— evidence is kind of, is there, you can get arrested at football matches forioining _ can get arrested at football matches forjoining in chants that question the opposed team's sexual preferences but you can't apparently -et preferences but you can't apparently get arrested for chanting anti—semitic clearly anti—semitic remarks — anti—semitic clearly anti—semitic remarks on _ anti—semitic clearly anti—semitic remarks on london's streets, and so ithink— remarks on london's streets, and so i think she _ remarks on london's streets, and so i think she has the majority support of the _ i think she has the majority support of the conservative voters that delivered — of the conservative voters that delivered the majority at the last election — delivered the majority at the last election. and she's the only arguably— election. and she's the only arguably the only cabinet minister that does. — arguably the only cabinet minister that does, she plugs into the 2019 majority, — that does, she plugs into the 2019 majority, in a way nobody else in the cabinet — majority, in a way nobody else in the cabinet can. gn majority, in a way nobody else in the cabinet can.— majority, in a way nobody else in i the cabinet can._ also the cabinet can. on red wall? also be ond the cabinet can. on red wall? also beyond red — the cabinet can. on red wall? also beyond red wall, _ the cabinet can. on red wall? also beyond red wall, this _ the cabinet can. on red wall? also beyond red wall, this is _ the cabinet can. on red wall? also beyond red wall, this is the - the cabinet can. on red wall? also | beyond red wall, this is the working class _ beyond red wall, this is the working class vote, — beyond red wall, this is the working class vote, if you like, or the marginalised vote, that shifted from labour— marginalised vote, that shifted from labour to— marginalised vote, that shifted from labour to the conservatives, and i think— labour to the conservatives, and i think outside of that, the conservatives don't have an appeal to the _ conservatives don't have an appeal to the majority and they can't triangulate their way out of this. the only— triangulate their way out of this. the only path to prevent a decline which _ the only path to prevent a decline which the — the only path to prevent a decline which the government is heading towards. — which the government is heading towards, the government is heading towards _ towards, the government is heading towards a _ towards, the government is heading towards a defeat that looks of epic proportion, it like looks like they will be _ proportion, it like looks like they will be somewhere round 200 seats, thebe _ will be somewhere round 200 seats, thebe is _ will be somewhere round 200 seats, thebe is something it could take two, _ thebe is something it could take two, three elections to recover from and there _ two, three elections to recover from and there is— two, three elections to recover from and there is no sense the decline has been — and there is no sense the decline has been arrested by the king's speech. — has been arrested by the king's speech, by the party conference, policy _ speech, by the party conference, policy mix. — speech, by the party conference, policy mix, so, of course, you know, as we _ policy mix, so, of course, you know, as we said _ policy mix, so, of course, you know, as we said earlier, this is a point where _ as we said earlier, this is a point where conservatives either have to accept _ where conservatives either have to accept their fate and go gently into the dark— accept their fate and go gently into the dark night, or decide actually, a new_ the dark night, or decide actually, a new vision— the dark night, or decide actually, a new vision is needed, we shouldn't, _ a new vision is needed, we shouldn't, we still have a year, and ithink— shouldn't, we still have a year, and i think many— shouldn't, we still have a year, and i think many mps are crying out for leadership— i think many mps are crying out for leadership and a vision, at the very least _ leadership and a vision, at the very least to— leadership and a vision, at the very least to rest — leadership and a vision, at the very least to rest the decline this is so clearly— least to rest the decline this is so clearly coming. least to rest the decline this is so clearly coming-— clearly coming. and the clock is tickina. clearly coming. and the clock is ticking- and _ clearly coming. and the clock is ticking. and the _ clearly coming. and the clock is ticking. and the clock— clearly coming. and the clock is ticking. and the clock is - clearly coming. and the clock is| ticking. and the clock is ticking, the oint ticking. and the clock is ticking, the point is. _ ticking. and the clock is ticking, the point is, labour— ticking. and the clock is ticking, the point is, labour have - ticking. and the clock is ticking, the point is, labour have been, | ticking. and the clock is ticking, - the point is, labour have been, you know. _ the point is, labour have been, you know, starmer, to starmer's credit he has _ know, starmer, to starmer's credit he has rid — know, starmer, to starmer's credit he has rid the labour party of the corbynite — he has rid the labour party of the corbynite element that poisoned then _ corbynite element that poisoned then. those who argue he hasn't won then. those who argue he hasn't won the hearts— then. those who argue he hasn't won the hearts of— then. those who argue he hasn't won the hearts of electorate are correct _ the hearts of electorate are correct. we have a visionless offer from _ correct. we have a visionless offer from both— correct. we have a visionless offer from both parties, and a vision can tip the _ from both parties, and a vision can tip the balance. i do from both parties, and a vision can tip the balance.— tip the balance. i do think that the idea that the _ tip the balance. i do think that the idea that the conservatives - tip the balance. i do think that the idea that the conservatives might | tip the balance. i do think that the i idea that the conservatives might be able idea that the conservatives might be abte to— idea that the conservatives might be abte to turn— idea that the conservatives might be able to turn round _ idea that the conservatives might be able to turn round their electoral- able to turn round their electoral fortunes — able to turn round their electoral fortunes by— able to turn round their electoral fortunes by changing _ able to turn round their electoral fortunes by changing prime - able to turn round their electoral. fortunes by changing prime minister yet again— fortunes by changing prime minister yet again without _ fortunes by changing prime minister yet again without an _ fortunes by changing prime minister yet again without an election - fortunes by changing prime minister yet again without an election is for i yet again without an election is for the birds _ yet again without an election is for the birds though, _ yet again without an election is for the birds though, think— yet again without an election is for the birds though, think what - yet again without an election is for the birds though,