the former soviet union and other authoritarian dictatorial regimes. this was mike pence reaction. why is ron desantis of florida, someone you know, not speaking out as forcefully?— know, not speaking out as forcefull ? ., ., , , forcefully? rhonda santos is trying to walk a tight _ forcefully? rhonda santos is trying to walk a tight rope _ forcefully? rhonda santos is trying to walk a tight rope because - forcefully? rhonda santos is trying to walk a tight rope because he - to walk a tight rope because he knows that he needs donald trump supporters. therefore, if he comes out against donald trump too forceful and to forceful into aggressively upfront, he could lose the supporters that come with donald trump, they would follow in his lap because he is the second one on the pulling this right now. so, he's walking a tightrope to make sure he does not offend donald trump supporters. but does not offend donald trump sunporters-— does not offend donald trump su orters. �* :: ' f supporters. but 20% feel they're undecided about _ supporters. but 2096 feel they're undecided about the _ supporters. but 2096 feel they're undecided about the charges, i supporters. but 2096 feel they're l undecided about the charges, they supporters. but 2096 feel they're - undecided about the charges, they do not really know he went beyond what he was entitled to do and committed a crime. how does rhonda santos, they probably reflect who will sit and watch the trial, how does rhonda santos keep the door open to them if he is siding with donald trump and single, this is a political persecution questionable but i believe what ron desant is going to do is talk about the rights of an individual he do is talk about the rights of an individua ., ., ~' do is talk about the rights of an individua ., individual he will look at the erson individual he will look at the person they _ individual he will look at the person they can _ individual he will look at the person they can flip - individual he will look at the - person they can flip washington, dc if of washington, dc in the epidemic in those 30% of its organisation of our government anglicans that political rivals come paris where ron desantis can be the saviour of the country to come in and stabbed be that leader, the adult in the room decision can fix it into a people want to fix the government so it is truly representative government. the six co conspirators are not named in the indictment, but from the attributed quotes, that jack smith includes in his indictment we can say with some certainty that they are the following people connected to donald trump: rudy giuliani, mr trump s lawyer john eastman, a constitutional lawyer, jeffrey clark, a justice department lawyer, sidney powell, a conservative lawyerken chesebro, a lawyer. and — the new york times is now reporting they believe boris epshteyn, an adviser to the trump campaign is the sixth co—conspirator. rudy giuliani self identified himself and this is what he had to say. we will see if we can play that, let us see if you can find the clip. in the meantime, let us talk about the defence that rudy giuliani is put out, talking about jack smith and some fairly vulgar terms that he is a nothing lawyer and that he is a hack and what you make of the way that rudy giuliani is responding to the indictment so far? ida that rudy giuliani is responding to the indictment so far?— the indictment so far? no matter what, the indictment so far? no matter what. there _ the indictment so far? no matter what, there should _ the indictment so far? no matter what, there should be _ the indictment so far? no matter what, there should be some - the indictment so far? no matter i what, there should be some civility. as a lawyer, — what, there should be some civility. as a lawyer, you can disagree with someone's — as a lawyer, you can disagree with someone's position or the indictment itself but _ someone's position or the indictment itself but to _ someone's position or the indictment itself but to start throwing names and doing — itself but to start throwing names and doing that, it defeats its purpose _ and doing that, it defeats its purpose and ultimately, it's going to be _ purpose and ultimately, it's going to be up— purpose and ultimately, it's going to be up to — purpose and ultimately, it's going to be up to the fact that evidence of what _ to be up to the fact that evidence of what is — to be up to the fact that evidence of what is presented and we have to remember_ of what is presented and we have to remember that according to the indictment, these people have not been _ indictment, these people have not been named and there are only speculating who they are and they have been— speculating who they are and they have been charged as well. and is an ongoing _ have been charged as well. and is an ongoing investigation and will be potential issues we know that rudy giuliani _ potential issues we know that rudy giuliani is _ potential issues we know that rudy giuliani is facing issues in dc with his her_ giuliani is facing issues in dc with his bar licence as well and we will have _ his bar licence as well and we will have to _ his bar licence as well and we will have to see, ultimately, how that plays _ have to see, ultimately, how that plays out — have to see, ultimately, how that -la s out. , . , have a chapter in my book called stand up to bullies. this is what i say to jack smith. after the supreme court throughout the case which should've been a disgrace and you should've been a disgrace and you should've gone and found another profession because you do not belong in this one. this one will be your legacy. violating the right of free speech of an american citizen. never mind and give you as or not. it can be anybody can make be a homeless person. you do not get to violate peoples first amendment rights, smith! no matter who you are and how sick you are with trumped derangement syndrome. this is not the first time you've acted like an unethical boy. it should be the last! —— lawyer. turning them in the state witnesses, giuliani does not sing with someone who is ready to turn. you giuliani does not sing with someone who is ready to turn.— giuliani does not sing with someone who is ready to turn. you never know what is going — who is ready to turn. you never know what is going on _ who is ready to turn. you never know what is going on and _ who is ready to turn. you never know what is going on and what _ who is ready to turn. you never know what is going on and what could - what is going on and what could potentially happen as well but there is no need _ potentially happen as well but there is no need to throw mud. we can disagree — is no need to throw mud. we can disagree on — is no need to throw mud. we can disagree on different issues, but we can, we _ disagree on different issues, but we can, we do— disagree on different issues, but we can, we do not have to be disagreeable to one another. but ultimately, be up to the jury based on the _ ultimately, be up to the jury based on the evidence put to them for not they believe trump should be convicted these crimes. jennifer, i want to look _ convicted these crimes. jennifer, i want to look at _ convicted these crimes. jennifer, i want to look at that _ convicted these crimes. jennifer, i want to look at that new - convicted these crimes. jennifer, i want to look at that new york - convicted these crimes. jennifer, i l want to look at that new york times poll again, we're sitting here in the traumatic event presuming the case in washington becomes the determining factor in the election. i wonder if it is because we look at this poll and you see people asking about the economy and abortion, actually, for a lot of people these are much more important matters in first of all, the case of abortion, effectively, i think it's on 60% of people practically illegal as well but it's about 60% of people, two thirds think abortion should be legal when asked about the economy, and a form the majority of people do not think the economy is going in the right direction. see 49% of people, only 2% and joe biden is doing an excellentjob. of the economy, there's a lot of room for donald trump but the republicans on the wrong sides of the track when it comes to abortion. for the wrong sides of the track when it comes to abortion.— comes to abortion. for a number of ears, i comes to abortion. for a number of years. i do — comes to abortion. for a number of years. i do not— comes to abortion. for a number of years, i do not know _ comes to abortion. for a number of. years, i do not know why republicans have lodged onto the abortion issue is the number one priority. it gets so close to people's lives in government intrusion in peoples lives. these people go from there were abortion provider for the health and well—being of the mother, the safety of the child or incest and rape, but was the wiggle room for exclusion for it. and now, we've gone so far and almost every legislative session and every state, there is an abortion legislation coming about where we have to be in a country and care for the unborn as well. but when everything turns out that we are appears that we are trying to control the decisions in the lives of individuals but we claim to be, on the republican side, they claim to be a party of personal responsibility of leading the people make the decisions, the law is what it is, within the confines of the law, these individuals should be allowed to make their own decisions. there are more every day important issues for people which they do vote on. in terms of donald trump and whether or not he becomes the candidate, there are some who say thatis candidate, there are some who say that is now at the deal because he becomes a martyr every days in court in that plays we went the primary. but then he has to appeal to an independent electorate and the general election, how do you think republicans are going to help them reach out to those people? to bring u . reach out to those people? to bring u- an reach out to those people? to bring up an interesting _ reach out to those people? to bring up an interesting point, _ reach out to those people? to bring up an interesting point, will- reach out to those people? to bring up an interesting point, will be - reach out to those people? to bring up an interesting point, will be up. up an interesting point, will be up to the _ up an interesting point, will be up to the republican voters to make it determination if they want donald trump _ determination if they want donald trump to— determination if they want donald trump to be their nominee. the person— trump to be their nominee. the person that is going to represent them _ person that is going to represent them and — person that is going to represent them and potentially be president of them and potentially be president of the united states. but there are some _ the united states. but there are some republicans that have not gotten — some republicans that have not gotten behind him and supported him, even people and its former administration have come out very strongly— administration have come out very strongly against him and there's going _ strongly against him and there's going to — strongly against him and there's going to be some people who are going _ going to be some people who are going to, — going to be some people who are going to, obviously, supported and stayed _ going to, obviously, supported and stayed with them. but some republicans have come out and they do not _ republicans have come out and they do not support him. it'll be interesting to see if that changes but ultimately, we live in a democracy and if donald trump is the nominee. _ democracy and if donald trump is the nominee, it'll be up to the voter to a determination on who they want to leave _ a determination on who they want to leave the _ a determination on who they want to leave the us for the next four years — leave the us for the next four years. what kind of country do they want _ years. what kind of country do they want. . ., , ., , years. what kind of country do they want. _, , .,, ., want. the country as to whether republicans. — want. the country as to whether republicans, they _ want. the country as to whether republicans, they have - want. the country as to whether republicans, they have their- want. the country as to whether - republicans, they have their talking points and they know that donald trump wants them to focus onjoe biden and hunter biden, but i wonder if the strategy on the republican side is all politicians are the same, a turn—off for independent such that it actually becomes quite a narrow vote, donald trump stays in it because everyone is so repulsed by the state of politics in washington. than by the state of politics in washington. by the state of politics in washinuton. �* , , ., , washington. an interesting strategy and that was — washington. an interesting strategy and that was used _ washington. an interesting strategy and that was used during _ washington. an interesting strategy and that was used during the - washington. an interesting strategy and that was used during the time l and that was used during the time that every— and that was used during the time that every clinton ran for office and people were not showing up to vote and _ and people were not showing up to vote and limited the number of people — vote and limited the number of people and i think is important for people _ people and i think is important for people to — people and i think is important for people to important the selection is not significant it is, not only for the us— not significant it is, not only for the us but— not significant it is, not only for the us but for all our allies across the us but for all our allies across the world — the us but for all our allies across the world and it's going to be key in shaping — the world and it's going to be key in shaping our country and other countries for the near future and i think— countries for the near future and i think that's — countries for the near future and i think that's really important to look— think that's really important to look at — think that's really important to look at from that standpoint but hunter— look at from that standpoint but hunter biden is not running for political— hunter biden is not running for political office. donald trump is running — political office. donald trump is running for office and said, the actions — running for office and said, the actions are _ running for office and said, the actions are against him and i think he needs— actions are against him and i think he needs to — actions are against him and i think he needs to be held accountable for those _ he needs to be held accountable for those actions and i think it is key of it trying — those actions and i think it is key of it trying to turn around at a family— of it trying to turn around at a family member but hunter biden is not running for office. around the world across the uk, this is bbc news. the family all about teapots, spending a quarter of million pounds on the collection in the uk. everything from politicians to pop culture and wild and wacky creations. . , creations. harley-davidson teapot and use the _ creations. harley-davidson teapot and use the arguments _ creations. harley-davidson teapot and use the arguments with - creations. harley-davidson teapotl and use the arguments with limited and use the arguments with limited and this one is diana.— and use the arguments with limited and this one is diana. because diana was my favourite _ and this one is diana. because diana was my favourite person. _ and this one is diana. because diana was my favourite person. four- and this one is diana. because diana was my favourite person. four why l was my favourite person. four why not click— was my favourite person. four why not click teapots? there so many different — not click teapots? there so many different weird and wonderful things with it _ different weird and wonderful things with it into the museum to the different— with it into the museum to the different things we do, we have once thought— different things we do, we have once thought of— different things we do, we have once thought of this size in 12 foot in the garden. you never can make. you never believe what people can make. thanks for watching. and for big day but the indictment of donald trump and we can see a picture of the courthouse where the federal hearing will take place tomorrow. terry, can we talk about the arraignment. it's in front of the arraignment. it's in front of the federaljudge and we do not know whether donald trump will be there in person, what do you know about her with a project she is? the her with a pro'ect she is? the federal her with a project she is? the federaljudges _ her with a project she is? the federaljudges in _ her with a project she is? the federaljudges in the us, the article — federaljudges in the us, the article three judges are appointed by the _ article three judges are appointed by the president. so, will be look at the _ by the president. so, will be look at the case — by the president. so, will be look at the case in florida, the federal judge _ at the case in florida, the federal judge overseeing for the case was appointed by trump. the case in new york against— appointed by trump. the case in new york against trump was a state court judge _ york against trump was a state court judge in— york against trump was a state court judge in the — york against trump was a state court judge in the federaljudge overseeing donald trump's indictment in dc was— overseeing donald trump's indictment in dc was appointed by barack obama. magistrates are not article three judges _ magistrates are not article three judges that not life terms and are not political appointees. the}r not political appointees. they -redict not political appointees. they predict cameron _ not political appointees. they predict cameron on _ not political appointees. they predict cameron on the - not political appointees. tia: predict cameron on the arraignments and court appearances so far. i think is a likelihood but he will turn up in washington, dc and the look of the polling in the programme and say, it is working. it and say, it is working. it has worked in — and say, it is working. it has worked in every _ and say, it is working. it has worked in every indictment. and say, it is working. it has i worked in every indictment has and say, it is working. it has - worked in every indictment has come right after a big story on hunter joe biden. every indictment is from the day after two days after. it changes the narrative in the media deducted by donald trump and it helps donald trump because it obeys my true hearing about him, and earlier, how does a republican run messaging for the donald trump coming on the primary is the candidate to run againstjoe biden whoever wins the democratic primary. the republican party is going to render a messaging and donald trump is going to run his messaging as his indictments, where the merging messaging is going to be you cannot trust the government. if the government can come up to someone like me with these particular fabricated evidence, they can come after you as well. that is going to be there messaging.— after you as well. that is going to be there messaging.- but l after you as well. that is going to be there messaging. kelly? but they are not fabricating _ be there messaging. kelly? but they are not fabricating evidence and the coiour— are not fabricating evidence and the colour guard is set under the law, you're _ colour guard is set under the law, you're innocent proven guilty. there is no _ you're innocent proven guilty. there is no fabrication evidence. after understand that the print sure you heard _ understand that the print sure you heard evidence and believed he should — heard evidence and believed he should be church with a serious crime _ should be church with a serious crime -- — should be church with a serious crime —— grandjury. the should be church with a serious crime —— grand jury. the fact that this is— crime —— grand jury. the fact that this is some _ crime —— grand jury. the fact that this is some evidence was fabricated.— this is some evidence was fabricated. ., , ., ., fabricated. who is it that is on a rand fabricated. who is it that is on a grand jury _ fabricated. who is it that is on a grand jury was _ fabricated. who is it that is on a grand jury was it _ fabricated. who is it that is on a grand jury was it is _ fabricated. who is it that is on a grand jury was it is made - fabricated. who is it that is on a grand jury was it is made up - fabricated. who is it that is on a grand jury was it is made up of. fabricated. who is it that is on a - grand jury was it is made up of your peers and it is people from the district. ., , ., ., ., peers and it is people from the district. ., ., ., district. people in florida that sat on the grand _ district. people in florida that sat on the grand jury _ district. people in florida that sat on the grand jury and _ district. people in florida that sat on the grand jury and showing - district. people in florida that sat on the grand jury and showing up| district. people in florida that sat i on the grand jury and showing up for 'ury on the grand jury and showing up for jury duty— on the grand jury and showing up for jury duty and selected for the grand 'ury jury duty and selected for the grand jury and _ jury duty and selected for the grand jury and there was a grand jury in dcat— jury and there was a grand jury in dc at a _ jury and there was a grand jury in dc at a grand jury in new york as welt _ dc at a grand jury in new york as welt so. — dc at a grand jury in new york as well. so, that's all the people sitting there, listening to the evidence _ sitting there, listening to the evidence and determining that he should _ evidence and determining that he should be — evidence and determining that he should be charged with serious crimes — should be charged with serious crimes. �* ., ., , ., crimes. and another way is even a ham sandwich _ crimes. and another way is even a ham sandwich to _ crimes. and another way is even a ham sandwich to get _ crimes. and another way is even a ham sandwich to get indicted i crimes. and another way is even a ham sandwich to get indicted by i crimes. and another way is even a ham sandwich to get indicted by a | ham sandwich to get indicted by a grand jury. ham sandwich to get indicted by a grandjury. is ham sandwich to get indicted by a rand 'u . , ,., ., ham sandwich to get indicted by a urand'u . , . �* grand jury. is the point that you're makin: , grand jury. is the point that you're making. and _ grand jury. is the point that you're making, and this _ grand jury. is the point that you're making, and this is _ grand jury. is the point that you're making, and this is an _ grand jury. is the point that you're making, and this is an important l making, and this is an important point because i make a significant part of the proceedings is that dc which is a democratic town, donald trump cannot get a fair hearing from a group of his peers and that is why his lawyers are talking about moving at west virginia are trying to get them moved west virginia. abs, at west virginia are trying to get them moved west virginia. a smart move on their _ them moved west virginia. a smart move on their behalf _ them moved west virginia. a smart move on their behalf because i them moved west virginia. a smart move on their behalf because if- them moved west virginia. a smart | move on their behalf because if they can prove or show that there is bias in a town that is worked against him and we are sitting there with a rush of collusion and the information presented there with a rush of pollution and the information presented data show that was a fabricated or made—up story, he. what they said was he invited russian pollution and expected to profit from it. it they also said it was the dossier that they went to a pfizer record to say that we need to spy pfizer record to say that we need to spy on him because of the information to be presented to the court was stated to be false information at the end of the day. what i'm saying is that he can utilise that in this argument to move the venue.— utilise that in this argument to move the venue. what is true and re . uired move the venue. what is true and required tech _ move the venue. what is true and required tech to _ move the venue. what is true and required tech to leave _ move the venue. what is true and required tech to leave it _ move the venue. what is true and required tech to leave it here. i move the venue. what is true and | required tech to leave it here. this will stress test all of the american institutions going in the next year. i think it is important to remember that we _ i think it is important to remember that we live — i think it is important to remember that we live in a democracy that someone — that we live in a democracy that someone voting is a fundamental i’ili'it someone voting is a fundamental right and — someone voting is a fundamental right and people to be held accountable for their actions in the us, no— accountable for their actions in the us, no matter who they are, where they are _ us, no matter who they are, where they are and — us, no matter who they are, where they are and i think that is key. but ultimately in our system, it will be — but ultimately in our system, it will be up — but ultimately in our system, it will be up to the jurors based on the evidence that they hear and to make a _ the evidence that they hear and to make a determination of what the facts _ make a determination of what the facts are — make a determination of what the facts are anything that will be key. we will _ facts are anything that will be key. we will have to leave it there. the arraignment is at four o'clock eastern time which puts a bright bang in the middle of our programmes will be here for two hours tomorrow night and will follow every detail and i hope you willjoin us in many of our panelists bejoining us. thank you very much for your company this evening and sync us through a very complex indictment. 20 more to come. we will see you then. goodbye. we start at the women's world cup down under where it's been a day to rememberforjamaica and south africa — who have both upset the odds to reach the knockout stages. having had to crowdfund just to get to the tournament jamaica were able to hold brazil to a goalless draw in theirfinal group game in melbourne to book their place in the last 16 for the first time. that means brazil and their 6 time world player of the year marta — are heading home. and loss for words, so emotional and we go much of the pitch and a lot of us, we believe in ourselves. we round out the result and we knew we could do it. france top that group after beating panama, but they had to come from behind. marta cox scoring panama's first ever goal at the tournament — and what a goal it was. an absolute piledriver, they ended up scoring three in total but france plundering six — including a hat—trick for kadi diani. in group g, south africa are through after claiming their first women's world cup win with a thrilling victory over italy. south africa gifted a leveller through benedetta orsi having gone behind. both teams then scored again — a result which would have taken italy through but the twist came in the 93rd minute thembi kgatlana sending south africa into seventh heaven and the knock out stages. no issues for sweden who made it 3 wins from 3 beating argentina 2—0 — rebecka blomkvist with the pick of the goals, sending the euro 2022 semi finalists through as group winners. in men's football — manchester city look to have finally secured a deal to bring josko gvardiol to the etihad. they've agreed a 77 million pound deal with rb leipzig for the defender — who will now have a medical later this week. gvardiol will become city's second signing of the summer following the arrival of fellow croatian mateo kovacic from chelsea. england's cricketers have been docked 19 world test championship points after their slow over rate during the ashes, whilst australia have lost 10 points. it means england have gone from joint first to fifth in ther world test championship standings, whilst australia have gone from 1st to fourth. both sets of players have also lost a percentage of their match fees — depending on how slow their over rate was for each test. england's biggest penalty came in the second test — where players lost 45% of their match fee. australia meanwhile were fined 50% of their match fees for the fourth test. on the field of play, the weather has dictated proceedings on day two of the hundred. both matches in the women's competition between welsh fire and manchester originals and london spirit against the oval invincibles were abandoned because of rain. there was play in the men's competition though. last year's runners up, the originals, lost to welsh fire. chasing 95, the originals lost 2 wickets in 2 balls at the start of their innings and despite the best efforts ofjos buttler fell 10 runs short of their target in a rain affected a0 ball match. and there was a thrilling finish in the second game of the day — as the oval invincibles chased down 132 for victory against london spirit — and they did so with three wickets in hand and one ball to spare. sunil narine was the invicibles star man — hitting 12 off three balls right at the death to secure victory. defending champions new zealand have missed the chance to book their place in the netball world cup semi finals but they are still on course to reach the final four. their progression and they were on course to do so at half time winning 26—21. but the hosts fought back in the 3rd and 4th quarter, to draw 48—all. it means south africa must beat malawi in their final match on wednesday and hope new zealand lose to jamaica to stand any chance of progressing. there's been more success for great britain at the para swimming world championships in manchester. maisie summers newton eased to victory in sm6 200m individual medley, successfully defending her world title. there was also a bronze too for faye rogers, as she finished third in the women's aoom freestyle s10. i want to stay at the top and keep winning medals. i put a lot of pressure on myself and as of the panicking and up and panicking so much. especially because industry final edited the outcome is going to be with the other kids are going to do and so, i can be happier, i'm so proud. thank you. and that's all the sport for now. hello there. this is not the sort of weather we'd get this time of the year usually, and we have to wait until later, next week for any significant improvements. now, today, earlier on, we had gusts of 60mph on the isle of wight — the winds are not as strong now, along the south coast of england. and there was some sunshine around as well here and there in between the downpours. and this was the radar from earlier on — we had some thundery downpours developing across some southern parts of the uk, and that more persistent rain across northern parts of england keeping it particularly chilly here. and it's all been due to yet another area of low pressure that steered right over the uk — and that was storm patricia, named by the french met service, with greater impacts across that part of europe. but things are going to calm down as we head into the night because the strong, gusty winds will continue to ease, the more persistent rain and thunderstorms move away, it does turn drier — some clearer spells developing later on in places, as well, and temperatures by dawn around about 11—13 celsius. storm patricia, that area of low pressure will be heading into southern scandinavia, taking the wet and windy weather with it. and then, as we head into thursday, the wind direction changes. we get a cooler north—to—northwesterly breeze, but it may well be a dry day for many places. there'll be some sunshine, particularly early on. cloud will build up, though, almost anywhere could see a shower, and some of them will be heavy and thundery — especially, i think, across southeast scotland and northern parts of england. but if you get a bit of shelter from that northerly wind, places like glasgow could see temperatures up to 20 celsius. it should be warmer in the southeast, as well, with fewer showers around here. but that's not really the story on friday — again, most of the showers down the eastern side of england, thundery downpours developing in the southeast and east anglia this time. probably not quite as windy on friday, and many western areas will have a dry day with some sunshine. but again, it's not that warm — 18 celsius in belfast, 19 in cardiff at best here. still cooler air over the next few days, because the jet stream is to the south of the uk, and then, it's going to come right over the uk — and that means we could see another area of low pressure heading our way by the time we get into saturday. another weekend, another area of low pressure, more wet and windy weather, a bit like today. the worst of it across england and wales. tonight at 10:00pm, donald trump faces his third and most serious set of criminal charges. he's accused of plotting to overturn the result of the last presidential election. it comes in the middle of mr trump's campaign to be the republican candidate for next year's election. so what do voters think? given all the legal troubles that there are right now, i don't think that he's a viable candidate. if he's the republican nominee i'd vote forjust about... i'd vote for you againstjoe biden. donald trump will come here to the federal courthouse in washington tomorrow to face his third court date in four months, and this time he's facing the most serious charges yet. donald trump's campaign said the charges were reminiscent of persecution inflicted in nazi germany. he's due to appear in court tomorrow. also on the programme... ten—month—old jacob crouch was murdered by his stepfather craig crouch in december 2020, a court in derby has found. summer's all but disappeared for holidaymakers in the uk, but farmers are also concerned about their harvests. # oh, i've been so down and under pressure... pop singer lizzo, famous for her messages of body positivity, is sued by three former dancers for alleged harrassment and fat—shaming. and is this an orca at play? we report on the killer whales whose new sport is to nudge small boats off the coast of spain. on newsnight at 10.30 — in a special report, voices from inside iran describe the new levels and methods of reppression directed at women by the morality police.