and ordered the closure of all illegal refineries in the south—east of the country. at least 110 people died in the blast. now on bbc news, it's time for dateline london. hello, and welcome to the programme which brings together some of the uk's leading columnists with the foreign correspondents who write, blog and broadcast from the dateline: london. here in the studio are steve richards, who's been walking and reporting the westminster beat for decades, penning newspaper columns and presenting the podcast rock and roll politics. maria margaronis is a journalist, who's written and presented a number of radio documentaries on the crises man—made and natural which have afflicted greece. ashis ray has half a century of explaining events here to his readers in india. a full—time occupation in itself, you might think, but he's still found time to commentate on his beloved cricket. lovely to have you all new the studio. all together as well. so thank you for being with us. borisjohnson street, according to a ukrainian mp, could soon be found on maps for odesa, as it expunges the memorialisation of famous russians. assuming the british prime minister's visit to india this week is followed in due course by a free trade deal — something neither the european union nor the united states has pulled off — there'll probably be a thoroughfare named in his honour in mumbai, too. in this country, borisjohnson way might be a cul—de—sac. such is the growing contrast between mrjohnson�*s global reputation and his domestic one. despite championing the cause of ukraine in europe, there's been no finger waggling in his meeting with narendra modi for the indian prime minister's support for russia. modi, johnson, putin — populist leaders in the ascendant. by the end of this weekend, we'll know whether or not that holds true for france, too. steve, let us begin with borisjohnson at home, however much he would rather we weren't concentrating on that. what has changed this workers and how potentially troublesome is that for mrjohnson? the mood of conservative mps, they are the ones with agencies, everyone else can express opinions about him, they are the ones with the power to remove him and something moved on thursday, when the whips couldn't discipline them all to vote against what labour was trying to do, which is to start an investigation, fairly soon, by one of the parliamentary select committees, and the reason that is significant is we talk about what a conservative mp going to do, as if they were a collective, all of the same mind, all of similar experience. actually tons of them are pretty new to national politics, having got in in december 2019. a lot of the time, when people say conservative mps will do this, they don't know, they aren't sure what to do, and they are still in that kind of mood, but when you have kind of made something of a move to signal distance with the prime minister, that empowers you to do it again, so that is one of the things that has changed. and the other is itjust feels as if this crisis for him is just not going to end. there is a corrosive quality to it. it has always been deadly serious to face an allegation of making rules, breaking them and lying about doing so, but there was a sense sometimes it was going to fade, but it hasn't. so the combination of the two, i think, are significant. i am struck on friday, listening to lord hayward, a former conservative mp who has been around since the 80s, who was recalling the mood change when he was a young mp for margaret thatcher in that last year, before... i heard that too. but he said something interesting, he said last weekend, easterweekend as it was, in much of the, much of the country, much of the continent, he said he was reflecting the prime minister was probably all right for now, and his mood had changed in the space of less than a week because he had been talking to conservative mps. what do you think is the problem here for boris johnson? is itjust he, you know, it keeps coming back at him? people are just fed up with this. i mean that — i am fed up with it. we, i don't want to talk about this any more. the thing that puzzles me, this is a man who has been known to lie all his life. i think it was either his headmaster or house master at eton who wrote "boris doesn't seem to think the rules apply to him." look at the brexit campaign, the thing, there is going to be no border between northern ireland and the rest of the uk, it is endless, the lies are endless, and look at... but they haven't mattered apparently. look at the policy problems, look what happened during the pandemic. underneath the lies is a great mountain of incompetence and bad administration and bad government. now i see why lying particularly matters at the moment, when we have so many lies in international politics, when we have, you know, putin's lies about what is going on in ukraine. "it is not an invasion, we are acting to defend ourselves." lies matter, lies to the house of commons matter, breaking your own rules matter, but it is, to me it is like this is the sort of cherry on the cake of a lot else that has gone badly wrong. how was he received in india? this visit had been delayed because of covid, but there had been a sense it was one that the indian government was keen on, just as the british government was, and that perhaps he was a more attractive figure to many in india, certainly to the prime minister, than his predecessor theresa may, who went to india but whose visit was a bit of a flop really. well, over the years, - boris has been a popular figure in india, his dishevelled hair- and hisjokes tended to go down well, so to that extent, - i think, he is not an unpopular figure in india, they don't- care much about what is going on in this country, - so he was well received, but unfortunately, for him, if the timing of the visit - was meant to divert attention from what was going on in. westminster, it has| failed spectacularly, and, certainly, the coveragel that has come out in the last two days have overshadowed his claims about trade and defencel and the rest of it. certainly on day one, i it was completely about the debate at westminster. which was taking place that day, on the first day of the visit to india. correct, and the fact - that the motion was passed and he has been referred i to the privileges committee it is bad news, but in india, i think, the little saving - grace he might have had on day two, i think that too _ was dogged by questionsj regarding what was going on back home, and as much as he tried to deflect it - by talking about other things, and the brighter side - and so on, but i think| at the end of the day, this tended to be the questions which were put to him - at the press conference, for instance. _ steve, we are at a strange stage. the police have said there will be no further announcements about fines over lockdown parties, before the local elections, for they have gone into their own version of purdah because they don't want to be accused of influencing the elections, they are two weeks away. come the friday after polling day, what will be the kind of calculation, do you think, the conservative mp may be making? two things, before then, i have spoken to some who have said that although they have big doubts about him, there is no way they will speak during this campaign, because all their local party activists are out campaigning, and they don't want to have quotes plastered over labour posters about their views of borisjohnson, so we are at a strange phase. some are speaking out already, and surprisingly loudly, that he has to go. if the elections go really badly for the conservatives, normally a prime minister can brush that off as midterm results, but because of this context, it will be explosive, and there is quite a pivotal by—election coming up later on in the summer so there are electoral tests, but, i think in a way, it has got beyond that, when you say why is it carrying on? it is the nature of the investigation, it might have been around since december, but it is, you can't get a bigger allegation. now he has always insisted he didn't think there were parties and the rest of it, but the police seem to be taking a different view, given the number of penalty notices that have gone out. there is this independent gray — not independent, commission by borisjohnson, gray report to come, and i think that is his problem, that the nature of what he is alleged to have done during these lockdowns, and that is the problem where voters as well, you know. isn't it really about the arrogance, about people's realisation of the arrogance of this prime minister, people whose relatives died who couldn't be with their relatives, who couldn't go to see their dying mother and father, everyone who lost someone and kept the rules is disgusted by this. i don't think arrogance is the right word. there is a thoughtlessness. most prime ministers are neurotic about every move they make. "if i do this, what will happen?" he doesn't tend to pose those questions, so a theresa may or a gordon brown having drinks at a works do, they would be, you know, is this, is this a party, is it a work do? could it be seen as a party? i don't think he goes through those thought processes. but why? why doesn't he? good question. what i would say is he was certainly in trouble - in february, and then came the russian invasion, - and that seemed to give him a little bit of a lease - of life, and you constantly- heard conservative politicians saying this is not the time to oust him, but what hasj happened in the last week, i i think, is a change of mood. i entirely agree with| what steve has said. that argument doesn't really stack up, lloyd george replaced asquith, churchill replaced chamberlain and margaret thatcher was replaced byjohn major during the first gulf war. modi's relationship with putin. first of all, how important is that relationship for india? i mean, i understand it is a historical association, the non—aligned movement and poking the united states in the eye which was popular in the 50s and 60s, but now? first of all, india hasn't. supported russia on this invasion, so indiaj has been neutral. the interesting thing is modi has done a sort of half - somersault, for the simple reason that indian foreignl policy, from 1991 onwards, was multi—alignment, - because the cold war ended and india reached out- to the west, and the west responded, so it becamel multi—alignment but what modi did, when he came to power. he tilted towards the - united states, so from that position, i think it became - a little awkward for the simple reason that people in the west. started asking, "but we thought that you were with us now." but india has this - disadvantage, if you like, of dependence on russia in terms of defence. - 50% of india's defence - imports come from russia. then over the years, - when it has come to tricky situations for india, - at international forums, at the united nations, - at the un security council russia has saved india. that is a very interesting perspective on that relationship, isn't it. maria. prime minister modi makes this announcement during an interview or he says i want an immediate ceasefire, which is a slight toughening of the position, given they have had a position of neutrality on the invasion, that kind of took a bit of pressure, i guess, off borisjohnson, because people were saying shouldn't you have been out there, maybe not wagging fingers publicly, but quietly pressing behind the scenes and saying, "come on, we need you to use your influence on the russians." i imagine one of the things borisjohnson has been saying, and as part of this trumpeted trade deal, is he should be buying arms from britain instead of from india, because britain has a very large arms industry, so that is part of it. i wonder how much modi has been kind of, you know, getting a boost from boris's arrival? i saw those big posters up on the street, saying "welcome borisjohnson," and, you know, there is all sorts of problems at home in india and the fact — the other issue for borisjohnson, is he going to say anything about the bjp and the muslim community? crosstalk. we talked last time about the persecution of christians. yes, but i think he said nothing. nothing. there is a reference - where boris said india has constitutional safeguards - on these matters, because he was asked a question - at the press conference — by the way, modi doesn't do press conferences. . so, this is really unusual. yes, so they had the two i statement made by the two —— yes, so they had the two| statements made by the two leaders, they walked away and then, separately, - from what i could make out, perhaps at the residence - of the british high - commissioner, boris held a press conference, - where he took questions, so yes, he did — say that india has safeguards, but that is a very soft thing to say, given the current. circumstances. let me ask you — i am interested in terms of what you were saying — both saying about weapons actually and this question of 0k, we have a big arms business in the uk, borisjohnson is — part of any prime minister's foreign travels is promotion of business interests on the part for their country, we have this tie—up with australia and united states, aukus. we have india as part of the quad with united states and again, with other countries in that region. is it possible that india would be interested in this new alignment with the australians, with the british, with the americans? i think aukus it is| awkward for quad. because india is not part of august _ —— because india - is not part of aukus. but it is part of the quad. it is a competitor. but there is scope of british exports, defence exports to india. there has been a steady stream, but not very significant, - in recent years, britain lost out majorly on the combatl aircraft deal, which went - to the french, but that is now mired in a little bit- of controversy for the simple reason that it is alleged - that the modi government paid possibly three times more than what was estimated i by the indian defence ministry and so, it is a matter- of investigation by l a prosecutor in paris at the moment, so the charge is obviously corruption. - yes. that said, i think britain- is a competitor when it comes to aircraft and other products, certainly, and i would venturej to say that this visit - and subsequently will lead to some enhanced british exports to india. - right. we were talking about weapons — let us talk about weapons to ukraine. the prime minister announced british tanks are going to poland so poland can — to replace the tanks that poland will send to ukraine, because ukraine has the engineering knowledge and the spare parts, bluntly, for soviet era equipment, not western equipment. he also suggested there could come a point where we sent challenger tanks directly to ukraine. is that upping the ante, or has this become such a blurred question that it doesn't have clear significance? oh, no, it does, and i don't think it is blurred. it is very interesting, when you look at the origins of many terrible global wars, world war i and world war ii, especially world war i, you could see everyone moving in different directions with no intention of it becoming a global nightmare, and it becomes one. and when this all began, people said biden, others, johnson, we have to be very careful about escalation. there you have an example of something which appears to be escalation in terms of the uk's involvement. and i heard a tory mp being interviewed this morning saying, "what is the end?" johnson said, "putin must lose" — what does that mean? what does losing look like? and that is related to the question of whether, you know, the uk and others should continue supplying all kinds of equipment to ukraine, because what is the end? and i think that question is starting to be posed and has to be answered, or else it just stealthily becomes some potentially terrible conflagration — i mean, it is already awful, but what is the end game? it is not clear. no. i thinkjohnson's rode back a little today... 0h, has he? ..and said this is under consideration. not it is definitely going to happen. i mean, he is thinking of doing what biden decided not to do with aircraft, but with tanks, and i do know there are ukrainian troops being trained to use tanks here now. to me, it is not a clear line, you know, where — where does — where does this become a wider war and who makes it so? imean, putin's testing a new icbm. it is really difficult. i completely take your point about people making moves and not knowing where they go. and it seemsjust now on the ground that russia is very close to joining up crimea — the crimea with the donbas. then, we have on the other side transmitria in moldova and, in between, odesa, that quintessential city — which is, i mean, that would be a huge deal if 0desa fell to the russians. let us talk in the last few minutes — i mean, one of the things that unites modi, putin and borisjohnson is that we see them as populists, who have rode a wave of particular strong public feeling and have been able to guide it and have ridden it, all quite successfully, three of them, enforced in different ways. there is an election this weekend that could see a fourth joining that group and it is the french presidential election where emmanuel macron, the quintessential centrist, challenged by marine le pen, the kind of forever candidate of the far—right — and it seems to be forever, when you think of her father as well — and, all right, people have said she is not going to win, but they haven't written her off. no, and i think part of the problem in france is that macron is not seen by most people as a centrist but being on the right, so it's a choice between two right—wing candidates, who have jean—luc melenchon voters on the left. and he really is a perennial and —— candidate. he has always been a candidate for the left. he is the candidate of the left, but he has familiarity. people are saying they can't bear to hold their nose and vote for macron. it reminds me of the trump—hillary clinton election, that perception of smugness, of a candidate for the rich, of the establishment, all of that but again, the polls suggest she won't win, but the underlying issues are not going away, which have produced this wave of populist... and, to be fair, a lot of the issues were there five five years ago. they were. you can understand about some of the feeling that where has president macron been on these things? exactly, a lot of these things are insoluble by national governments — i mean, they are to do with globalisation, these — enormous issues about energy, climate, migration that are very threatening to people. i think one of the problems, i think, in this climate - of anti—russia _ environment has been the fact that her party took this loan from a russian bank. - of course, it was taken out six years ago, but the fact - is that it is still the party with the national rally, i is still paying back the loan and it comes at a bad time | for her, and as you know, i in the debate, macron raised raised this matter. but having said that, - i think at the end of the day, i think the fear of the far right will prevail- and therefore, regardless of macron's average - performance, i think people will reconcile themselves i to re—electing him. it is a very curious voting system, isn't it? in that in the first round, virtually every voter has a voice and can identify, and that you get this incredible range — you know, the left would do better than expected and so on. and then, it is narrowed down and people have to agonise over what to do. i'm sure you will probably be proven right, because that is the essence of that system, isn't it? people in... he was supposed to drive people to a clear choice. a clear choice, and the least worse, so to speak. but i am so used to shock results now, i would be surprised if there isn't a shock result. we were sitting here before — i mean, i think it is fair to say we were sitting — not naming individuals, because i am not sure if any of you were on the panel the week before trump was elected, people were still pretty confident that he wasn't going to pull it off. even on election night, i remember the broadcasters were still, early on, reporting as if hillary clinton had won, even though some of the results were not suggesting that was happening. we are so conditioned to expect one thing, but we are now increasingly conditioned to be shocked. two factors — one is a large i number of undecided voters, and you don't know which they will end up on the final day. i the second is this very- significant jean—luc melenchon section of voters. yes, i was saying last week... attracted 21% - in the first round. and three—quarters of all muslim voters. so if those muslim french voters can be persuaded that macron is at least more tolerable for their prospects than le pen, and you can mobilise that vote, that could be significant. crosstalk. but 50% of them might. i don't say it will happen, but one poll said that. i 50% of them might either not vote or spoil their ballot. - yes. i think he was in a heavily muslim suburb of paris today, he's on it. he's on it. but a long way to go. he has not been known to go there very often. no, no. the question is the future. we, you know, it is kind of the nature of our beast, we review the week, but we also look ahead, and not withstanding the result on sunday night, it is a question of what happens next time round, isn't it? there will be no macron because he can't run for a third successive term. evenif even if he comes back five years will that party have a candidate, will there be a return to the left and right? marine le pen could be a a candidate in five years�* time. she could! absolutely, she could. she has been around forever and will continue to remain forever a candidate. but this is the other thing, because the collapse of the so—called orthodox parties in france and the rise of macron almost as sort of a personalised party has kind of completely fractured the party system and yet, although it is a presidential election that we are witnessing now, you do have to have party bases. you know, macron busted through that, but with these consequences that the parties are so weakened, there could be space for a le pen figure to surface at some point, so i think it is rather worrying that those older parties have just kind of collapsed because what replaces them? yes, the party may be over for some but the consequences live on for everybody else. thank you all very much. thank you for your company. martine croxall will be be in this chair next week. i'll see you in a fortnight�*s time. from all of dateline, goodbye. hello. the weekend brought us lots more dry and settled weather. now, april 2022 is turning out to be a notably dry april, particularly towards the south. this was the picture as the sun set in north yorkshire sunday evening, and we've got a bit more of the same, so no great changes in the weather forecast over the next few days — it stays mainly dry and settled. you'll notice it'll be a little bit cooler and cloudier compared to the weekend, but also less of a breeze around, too. high pressure in charge of our weather at the moment, sitting to the north of the uk, but over the next few days, it drifts further south, sitting right across the uk by the time we get to wednesday. so, monday morning, then, temperatures 4—8 degrees in our towns and cities, a bit colder than that in the countryside first thing, so a fresh start to the day. most places largely dry with some sunshine. a little bit more cloud drifting in from the east compared to recent days, bringing a few showers to parts of eastern england through the morning and later in the afternoon, as the cloud bubbles up, could be one or two more just drifting their way west across central parts of england and wales, too. but many places staying dry, avoiding those showers. temperatures 16 degrees or so towards the south west but only ten under that cloud across the north east of scotland. through monday evening and overnight into tuesday, we'll see a bit more of that cloud in the north starting to try and push its way a bit further south, but clearer skies towards parts of england and wales mean we could just see a touch of grass frost heading into the early hours of tuesday morning so, again, a bit of a fresh start of the day, but another predominantly dry, settled day. probably a little bit more cloud, particularly across eastern parts of scotland and england, too. just one or two rogue showers, i think, developing during the afternoon, so a little bit more cloud than recent days, still some sunshine, still mild towards the south, 16—17 degrees, but temperatures are going to struggle to get out of single figures for north east england and eastern scotland with that cloud around. the breeze coming off a cool north sea over the next few days. a similar picture into wednesday — north—easterly breeze, but light winds for most. predominately dry once again but a bit more cloud around, particularly towards the east, and temperatures between about 9 to 1a degrees by this stage in the week. high pressure, then, moves its way further south. not many isobars on the map here as we look through thursday and, in fact, into friday, too. so, the weather looking predominantly dry, variable amounts of cloud, some sunny spells and temperatures getting into the mid teens for most of us, but it will be a largely dry end to a dry month. bye— bye. this is bbc news. welcome if you're watching here in the uk or around the globe. i'm nancy kacungira. our top stories: emmanuel macron becomes the first french president to be re—elected in 20 years. translation: from now on, i am not a candidate _ translation: from now on, i am not a candidate anymore. - translation: from now on, i am not a candidate anymore. i'm - not a candidate anymore. i'm now president of everyone. defiant in defeat — marine le pen says she'll use her best results ever as a springboard for the future. translation: tonight's . historic score puts our camp in an excellent position to obtain a large number of deputies nextjune. while christians celebrate 0rthodox easter in ukraine,