hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are susie boniface who is a columnist at the daily mirror and ali miraj who is a columnist at the article. tomorrow's front pages, starting with. yet more downing street lockdown revelations are on the front of the mirror — the paper claims number 10 staff took delivery of a wine fridge and held weekly �*wine—time fridays�*, as the uk was facing strict curbs — a source claims the prime minister regularly popped in and encouraged colleagues to "let off steam" the times carries a warning from cabinet ministers who claim partygate has left the prime minister drinking in the last chance saloon. the ft is of the same opinion, saying downing street's unprecedented apology to the queen has left the prime minister's future hanging by a thread. anger toward borisjohnson from the conservative grassroots is the focus for the guardian. the i claims leading conservatives liz truss and rishi sunak are preparing to swoop on a party leadership contest, as the pressure mounts on the prime minister. but the mail turns the spotlight on sir keir starmer — and carries a picture of what the paper claims to be the labour leader drinking beer at an indoor gathering in durham last april. the telegraph claims plan b covid restrictions in england are set to be lifted from 26th january — as the prime minister looks to secure his political survival. the paper also suggests that princess beatrice is likely to be called as a witness in her father's sex assault case so, let's begin. do you want to kick us off this time with the paper, the mirror? this is a long line of re orts mirror? this is a long line of reports in — mirror? this is a long line of reports in the _ mirror? this is a long line of reports in the mirror - mirror? this is a long line of reports in the mirror has - mirror? this is a long line of. reports in the mirror has been coming — reports in the mirror has been coming off— reports in the mirror has been coming off of successive stories about _ coming off of successive stories about parties, first it was christmas parties and the and other parties _ christmas parties and the and other parties and — christmas parties and the and other parties and of this latest revelation that every friday, there were _ revelation that every friday, there were figures in downing street that were figures in downing street that were getting together on friday evenings, early evenings for me to help in_ evenings, early evenings for me to help in drinking alcohol. and those were _ help in drinking alcohol. and those were not_ help in drinking alcohol. and those were not allowed to be done and everyone — were not allowed to be done and everyone else was abiding by the rules_ everyone else was abiding by the rules and — everyone else was abiding by the rules and this give us an impression that there _ rules and this give us an impression that there is — rules and this give us an impression that there is different sets of rules— that there is different sets of rules for— that there is different sets of rules for those in positions of power— rules for those in positions of power and those for the rest of us. despite _ power and those for the rest of us. despite the — power and those for the rest of us. despite the prime minister trying to apologise _ despite the prime minister trying to apologise before prime discussions on wednesday, within a few hours, we had jacob _ on wednesday, within a few hours, we had jacob saying, the cabinet mihister_ had jacob saying, the cabinet minister saying that perhaps the rules— minister saying that perhaps the rules in— minister saying that perhaps the rules in hindsight were too harsh. they— rules in hindsight were too harsh. they may— rules in hindsight were too harsh. they may very well have been in a lot of— they may very well have been in a lot of people are arguing that they were at— lot of people are arguing that they were at the time. but the government made them _ were at the time. but the government made them in the government and civil servants, there are also working _ civil servants, there are also working with government ministers must _ working with government ministers must abide by them. going to the yorkshire post and to go to the yorkshire post on this latest story that there are reasons for that. . ., for that. the executive of the council, what _ for that. the executive of the council, what date _ for that. the executive of the council, what date was - the executive of the council, what this now. looking at the spreadsheet. december 2020. this now. looking at the spreadsheet. december2020. she was out of the covid—19 task force in the civil servants were actually tasked with writing the rules and coming up with the wording for the rules. an ulcer leaving during the cabinet office and she issued an apology fairly quickly, not quickly at the event, but quickly having been exposed or is been exposed and another party that is on the list of things. i think it's interesting and joseph said having this task force is writing the rules, notjust the addition abide by the rules, but the rules they wrote from about 17,700 people there just under 200 or so of them were prosecuted for having some kind of a gathering or being present at a party of some sort. in other that may be fair in some cases, they also had no right of appeal which is bizarre in british law that you are convicted of something and there's no right to appeal afterwards of further evidence comes forward to something. either you're in conviction or a fine. and people who were arrested or penalised or hounded or fined for not having perhaps done nearly as much as we have seen a downing street. people were arrested for playing football in the park with their children, people had police drones and they were going for a walk on the moors. people who were stopped because they're going for a socially distanced walking i bought a coffee on the way. these were people or hounded by the police and the police thought they were doing the right thing and they were fined and penalised for it and such a way that they cannot possibly have known and it was made illegal by the people who were breaking the rules. it was really galling is the reason they made these rules so tough and the reason they imposed it was partly because they believed that we would ignore it. that we would party, that we would drinking that we would care about each other and that we would be happy to get a break in any rules evenif be happy to get a break in any rules even if their guidelines. so they should heavy penalties and it turns out that in all those lockdowns, the british public and the great majority of us did behave, did obey the rules, it did think we need to make sacrifices to help everyone else knows the people making the rules were actually the selfish lawbreaking idiots and the laws now would appear don't up apply to because the metropolitan police say they are not going to investigate any of the stuff unless the people responsible for it all invite them to investigative. it's bizarre! i'm just waiting for them to ask my permission for who i want to get prosecuted for speeding one day. because that is about the level were at. the police force are waiting to be asked nicely to investigate someone when there's a clear evidence of a crime. it is absolutely shocking. it's what you would expect in a tinpot dictatorship, not an established and fairly healthy democracy at least until recent years what have they given you of spreadsheet of all the different parties so you can keep track? i did have. it’s different parties so you can keep track? i did have.— different parties so you can keep track? i did have. it's a very good idea. i track? i did have. it's a very good idea- i had _ track? i did have. it's a very good idea- i had a _ track? i did have. it's a very good idea. i had a sheet _ track? i did have. it's a very good idea. i had a sheet of _ track? i did have. it's a very good idea. i had a sheet of paper- track? i did have. it's a very good | idea. i had a sheet of paper but he ke -t idea. i had a sheet of paper but he kept changing- _ idea. i had a sheet of paper but he kept changing. susie _ idea. i had a sheet of paper but he kept changing. susie has - idea. i had a sheet of paper but he kept changing. susie has to - idea. i had a sheet of paper but he kept changing. susie has to keep i idea. i had a sheet of paper but he| kept changing. susie has to keep a spreadsheet. _ kept changing. susie has to keep a spreadsheet, you _ kept changing. susie has to keep a spreadsheet, you can _ kept changing. susie has to keep a spreadsheet, you can keep - kept changing. susie has to keep a spreadsheet, you can keep track. kept changing. susie has to keep a j spreadsheet, you can keep track of these _ spreadsheet, you can keep track of these things. a spreadsheet, you can keep track of these things-— these things. a very interesting oint these things. a very interesting point because _ these things. a very interesting point because i _ these things. a very interesting point because i was _ these things. a very interesting point because i was slightly - these things. a very interesting l point because i was slightly taken aback when i saw the quote from the metropolitan police think that we will investigate if the cabinet office advises us there's something to investigate. of the cabinet office is sort of in the frame, to coin thejordan. it's officials of the cabinet office, are also implicated and so it's a strange statement, do you think deposition can hold? i statement, do you think deposition can hold? ~' , ., , can hold? i think everyone is waitin: can hold? ! think everyone is waiting for— can hold? i think everyone is waiting for the _ can hold? i think everyone is waiting for the famous - can hold? i think everyone is waiting for the famous sue l can hold? i think everyone is i waiting for the famous sue grey report— waiting for the famous sue grey report that has been unfortunately tossed _ report that has been unfortunately tossed and i'm sure she must be hating _ tossed and i'm sure she must be hating every minute of it. it does seem _ hating every minute of it. it does seem very— hating every minute of it. it does seem very odd that she's even having to be _ seem very odd that she's even having to be put— seem very odd that she's even having to be put in— seem very odd that she's even having to be put in the position of doing this report, given that her boss signing — this report, given that her boss signing the case attended one party by his— signing the case attended one party by his own — signing the case attended one party by his own admission in the prime minister. — by his own admission in the prime minister. a — by his own admission in the prime minister, a political boss attended at least _ minister, a political boss attended at least one other one. so, if the seem _ at least one other one. so, if the seem a _ at least one other one. so, if the seem a bit— at least one other one. so, if the seem a bit odd but i guess what's going _ seem a bit odd but i guess what's going to — seem a bit odd but i guess what's going to happen and we want to preempt — going to happen and we want to preempt the report, with the baited breath— preempt the report, with the baited breath for~ — preempt the report, with the baited breath for. but she's probably going to conclude that this stuff potentially did not break rules, but it was— potentially did not break rules, but it was done in very poor taste, iooks— it was done in very poor taste, looks very— it was done in very poor taste, looks very bad. a few people are going _ looks very bad. a few people are going to — looks very bad. a few people are going to be fired. the problem with that is, _ going to be fired. the problem with that is, it's— going to be fired. the problem with that is, it's notjust a few people in downing — that is, it's notjust a few people in downing street, this seems to be a culture _ in downing street, this seems to be a culture of— in downing street, this seems to be a culture of drinking and avoiding the rules — a culture of drinking and avoiding the rules. that is something that i'm the rules. that is something that i'm finding — the rules. that is something that i'm finding puzzling to understand. but also _ i'm finding puzzling to understand. but also starts right from the top. boris _ but also starts right from the top. borisjohnson has got but also starts right from the top. boris johnson has got a but also starts right from the top. borisjohnson has got a lot of skills, he's a brilliant campaigner, he is _ skills, he's a brilliant campaigner, he is a _ skills, he's a brilliant campaigner, he is a very— skills, he's a brilliant campaigner, he is a very intelligent person. but it's got— he is a very intelligent person. but it's got a _ he is a very intelligent person. but it's got a very cavalier attitude towards — it's got a very cavalier attitude towards rules and hisjudgment is in question _ towards rules and hisjudgment is in question. tory party in peace they spoke _ question. tory party in peace they spoke to— question. tory party in peace they spoke to before christmasjust wanted — spoke to before christmasjust wanted to get to christmas in one piece _ wanted to get to christmas in one piece and — wanted to get to christmas in one piece and they had the whole patterson fiasco, christmas party, wallpaper — patterson fiasco, christmas party, wallpaper issues before christmas and when — wallpaper issues before christmas and when they breathe a sigh of relief— and when they breathe a sigh of relief because they thought they were turning the corner with omicron and the _ were turning the corner with omicron and the prime minister made the film and the prime minister made the right decision to not impose further restrictions— right decision to not impose further restrictions and other off to decent start of— restrictions and other off to decent start of the — restrictions and other off to decent start of the new year and they could make _ start of the new year and they could make it _ start of the new year and they could make it to _ start of the new year and they could make it to the 26th ofjanuary and now. day— make it to the 26th ofjanuary and now, day after day, we have this issue _ now, day after day, we have this issue. downing street having to apologise to buckingham palace, the two parties that took place the day before _ two parties that took place the day before prince philip was buried with the queen— before prince philip was buried with the queen sitting alone in the chapel— the queen sitting alone in the chapel in— the queen sitting alone in the chapel in windsor, which really touched — chapel in windsor, which really touched the whole nation. and every day, frankly, second a few civil servants — day, frankly, second a few civil servants is _ day, frankly, second a few civil servants is really going to get to the root — servants is really going to get to the root of the problem which is the prime _ the root of the problem which is the prime minister and how he rents his operation _ prime minister and how he rents his operation and it has to start at the top. operation and it has to start at the top you _ operation and it has to start at the top. you get this spectacle of all the senior— top. you get this spectacle of all the senior cabinet ministers, many were _ the senior cabinet ministers, many were working really hard and were very credible, having to defend the prime _ very credible, having to defend the prime minister distract from the governance. susie told us in the past 45 minutes of this— susie told us in the past 45 minutes of this was— susie told us in the past 45 minutes of this was keir starmer, and he would _ of this was keir starmer, and he would regret doing this at a time where _ would regret doing this at a time where he — would regret doing this at a time where he should've been stopped but ithink— where he should've been stopped but i think is— where he should've been stopped but i think is a _ where he should've been stopped but i think is a party office.— i think is a party office. influence in hartlepool- — i think is a party office. influence in hartlepool. if— i think is a party office. influence in hartlepool. if it— i think is a party office. influence in hartlepool. if it was _ i think is a party office. influence in hartlepool. if it was in - in hartlepool. if it was in hartlepool. probably - in hartlepool. if it was in - hartlepool. probably drowning his sorrows— hartlepool. probably drowning his sorrows given the fact that they lost to — sorrows given the fact that they lost to the tories got over 50% of the vote — lost to the tories got over 50% of the vote in— lost to the tories got over 50% of the vote in a labour stalwart seat that had — the vote in a labour stalwart seat that had been labour for decades. it is not _ that had been labour for decades. it is not to— that had been labour for decades. it is not to excuse his behaviour and he needs— is not to excuse his behaviour and he needs to — is not to excuse his behaviour and he needs to be careful because he has been — he needs to be careful because he has been throwing 11 stones of the prime _ has been throwing 11 stones of the prime minister, so he needs to be carefui~ _ prime minister, so he needs to be careful. people in positions of power— careful. people in positions of power need to be seen to be doing the right— power need to be seen to be doing the right thing and abiding by the rules _ susie, the telegraph. plan b to be scrapped to plan come back. pius susie, the telegraph. plan b to be scrapped to plan come back. plus the telea-rah, scrapped to plan come back. plus the telegraph. having _ scrapped to plan come back. plus the telegraph, having absolutely - telegraph, having absolutely destroyed boris johnson telegraph, having absolutely destroyed borisjohnson yesterday, but the revelations about what was happening on the eve of prince philip possible his funeral. there was nothing he could do to deeply offend the reader to suggest the queen was consulted or treated with disrespected her husbands funeral. in saying that we are scrapping plan b and omicron is fading away in their stuff about parties but try not to worry about it too much. i suspect because some of these are the first additions that we are seeing now, that they're going to be quite heavily rewritten for some of the revelations that are in the other newspapers. particularly in wine time fridays, that may get the top rewritten on that. and they are trying to find the positives in it. unfortunately, one of the lengths i think it's in the telegraph is that the trying to say this was only 20 letters of no confidence that have gonein letters of no confidence that have gone in for borisjohnson from the committee and the needs to be 54, so thatis committee and the needs to be 54, so that is not so bad. the committee and the needs to be 54, so that is not so bad.— that is not so bad. the night is ounu. that is not so bad. the night is young- there _ that is not so bad. the night is young. there was _ that is not so bad. the night is young. there was only - that is not so bad. the night is young. there was only five - that is not so bad. the night is i young. there was only five letters yesterday. _ young. there was only five letters yesterday. so _ young. there was only five letters yesterday. so we _ young. there was only five letters yesterday, so we had _ young. there was only five letters yesterday, so we had 15 _ young. there was only five letters yesterday, so we had 15 letters i young. there was only five letters yesterday, so we had 15 letters in| yesterday, so we had 15 letters in the space of the week and that could mean we could ever another for 54 to trigger an election or leadership contest in a very short space of time before things carry on ensuring the sign of abating so far, is it? we will risk through the couple of lessons. operation big dog for a rather hangdog prime minister. they're talking about the last chance — they're talking about the last chance saloon cabinet ministers reaiiy _ chance saloon cabinet ministers really feeling that as the prime ministers putting them in very awkward — ministers putting them in very awkward position and protecting him every— awkward position and protecting him every day— awkward position and protecting him every day is becoming very difficult to keep _ every day is becoming very difficult to keep going into being tried it out to— to keep going into being tried it out to defend of this nonsense going on. out to defend of this nonsense going on and _ out to defend of this nonsense going on and i_ out to defend of this nonsense going on. and i think the problem here is, talking _ on. and i think the problem here is, talking about a situation where a lot of— talking about a situation where a lot of mps have been going back to the constituencies this weekend, speaking — the constituencies this weekend, speaking to the local conservative party— speaking to the local conservative party associations were seeing the likes of— party associations were seeing the likes of sultan and other seriously rock-solid — likes of sultan and other seriously rock—solid tory blue constituencies and frankly— rock—solid tory blue constituencies and frankly losing patience. sol think— and frankly losing patience. sol think only— and frankly losing patience. sol think only 20 letters, we don't know. — think only 20 letters, we don't know. we _ think only 20 letters, we don't know, we don't know how many letters there are _ know, we don't know how many letters there are by— know, we don't know how many letters there are. by the full frontal assauit, _ there are. by the full frontal assault, others who have been quite brave _ assault, others who have been quite brave and _ assault, others who have been quite brave and open about it, they may not be _ brave and open about it, they may not be willing to commit regicide yet but _ not be willing to commit regicide yet but certainly the prime minister's damage, it's difficult to see him _ minister's damage, it's difficult to see him leading the party for the next election. a see him leading the party for the next election.— next election. a quick of story. telegraph. _ next election. a quick of story. telegraph, nervous _ next election. a quick of story. telegraph, nervous weights i next election. a quick of story. i telegraph, nervous weights since the telegraph. telegraph, nervous weights since the teleu-rah. �* , telegraph, nervous weights since the teleu-rah. �*, ., , , telegraph. there's a possibility that things _ telegraph. there's a possibility that things to _ telegraph. there's a possibility that things to progress - telegraph. there's a possibility| that things to progress through telegraph. there's a possibility i that things to progress through the process and prince andrew, that she could be compelled or asked to provide some sort of witness testimony about whether her father was working at the express of the night in question. and the telegraph reports that she has no memory of the event whatsoever. and she can also be asked whether her father sweats, and we should never be asked about our dads about that. judging by how things are going at the moment, briefly, djokovic on the practice court, looking a bit sweaty. having played some tennis. it's really difficult for djokovic, the australian immigration minister has rubbed his visa and he will be in court _ has rubbed his visa and he will be in court tomorrow in the australian open _ in court tomorrow in the australian open in _ in court tomorrow in the australian open in melbourne is going to be starting on monday and looks like it's pretty— starting on monday and looks like it's pretty bad for djokovic is going — it's pretty bad for djokovic is going to _ it's pretty bad for djokovic is going to have to wait to when that 21st grand — going to have to wait to when that 215t grand slam and it's looking like he — 215t grand slam and it's looking like he probably won't be in austria but he _ like he probably won't be in austria but he never should ability on the plane _ but he never should ability on the plane it's — but he never should ability on the plane. it's been a really unedifying as weii~ _ plane. it's been a really unedifying as well. . ~ plane. it's been a really unedifying as well. ., ,, , ., plane. it's been a really unedifying as well. ., ,, i. plane. it's been a really unedifying as well. . ~' ,, , plane. it's been a really unedifying as well. . ~' , . as well. thank you both very much. lovel to as well. thank you both very much. lovely to see _ as well. thank you both very much. lovely to see you. _ that's it for the papers this hour. the papers will be back again tomorrow evening with mihir bose and ros altmann. dojoin us then if you can but for now, goodnight. hello and welcome to the film review on bbc news. to take us through this week's cinema releases is mark kermode. so mark, what do we have this week? you can say happy new year. this is the first show we have done together. we have memoria we have a cannes jury prize winner. the scream franchise is back with scream in scream five but it's just called scream. and the feature documentary debut of cow. there is a good mixture. kick us off. memoria is the new film with a really wonderful family. tilda swinton who is great in almost everything is a botanist and she is in bogota where her sister is in hospital. we see her visiting her sister and talking to her sister and her partner. she is woken in the middle of the night by a sound. a strange booming sound and she thinks there be building work going on next—door and she starts hearing the sound wherever she is and it's a really peculiar sound and she becomes obsessed with the idea that nobody else appears to be able to hear it. so she goes to a sound engineer to say, can you make a copy of the sound for me to describe it? here is a clip. the film was columbia's submission for their best international feature and it's very elusive and meditative. the director is thought of of the high priest of slow cinema and if somebody says what's the film is about the temptation is to say it's about 24 hours. it's about the disjuncture between the past and present in between man and nature and people have memories that are not their memories and there are people who appeared to be dead but then they aren't dead and a lot of this is to do with her wondering whether everything is in her own mind as she makes a journey into the jungle to discover some kind of ecstatic truth. i have to say, i really liked it because i find this something meditative about this kind of cinema. look at things for a really long time, this is the opening shot before she even wakes up and it's not for everybody. but if you are a friend which i am, this is a really intriguing film and in the third act it does something which is completely out of the blue. and i think some people will think this is ridiculous and some people think this is very important and others will think it's a bit of both. i love the fact that with his movies you never know where they are going. the key to this is tilda swinton. what you're doing is you are watching the world through her eyes. you are watching her befuddlement about the sound. what does it mean, where is it going? why is everything i know about the world suddenly uncertain? and when the film provides an answer or at least some of an answer you will either go eww or you go ahh, but it's or you go ahh, but it's watching her respond to that really makes it work and it's in is on the and i thought it was really impressive, i really liked it. definitely intriguing. it is horror movie time again. he said try and sell this horror movie. this is the scream franchise which is part sequel, part reboot in much the same way as the 28th in halloween, it was not called halloween sequel. this is scream. and we are back in modern—day winnsboro, the ghost face killings which have been immortalised in the film are starting up again and there's the usual cocktail of meta— textual gags because the whole thing about the scream franchises it's a scary movie which people talk about being in a scary movie but there is original cast members and there's also a fresh new blood. the co—directors and writer of this made a film called ready or not. it's a horror movie black comedy hybrid and i really like to. so i went into this with high expectations. they were not generally met because the film is fine so if you've never seen the wes craven original in the cinema, ok, fine they will be a new generation of people wanting to see this on the big—screen department is what you don't have is the fear of the original. the original scream was scary. it was scary and also you don't have that an amazing thrill of originality. i'm hoping i would say is if you are really interested in scream and you want to see something else go back and that look at wes craven's new nightmare which is the film before scream which is also the film that basically inspired matrix resurrections and every year that goes by that film looks better and better. this is fine and i have no doubt it will be a crowd pleaser but for somebody of my vintage, it's kind of there the first time around with scream and it feels a bit like show us a new trick. do we need five of them? 0k. a documentary for your third choice. it follows the life of a cow on a dairy farm and the cycle of her life is basically impregnation than birth, lactation, of her life is basically impregnation then birth, lactation, separation from times, largely within barnes fairly industrial barns but very briefly out in the open. here is a clip. i have to say that is an unusual moment in the film, most of it takes place within very confined spaces and it's very industrialised environment. do you the remember this film which was just an observational documentary about a pig and what the director said he was trying to do is demonstrate the animals living and experiencing creatures but without a narration telling you about that. you get that here and it was shot in very elegant black and white. this is much more urgent hand—held, very up close and personal and a lot of looking straight into the child's eyes. i have to say it's very well done and very upsetting. i was about to say, is it upsetting? it is. it's not a film which tells you what to think about this or lecture you but what it does is it says if you are partaking of the dairy industry you need to be aware of how it works and you need to know where the produce that's on your table comes from. and i think the thing that is really powerful about this is without lecturing you, or without seeming like it's banging it's drum, he tells its story and its visual images and it says ok, this is what it is. you make of this what you will. i know one film critic friend of mine who was in tears for a lot of it. not everybody will feel the same way. i think that's one of its strengths. it is, here it is, you make your own decisions. i want to see it but i have a knot in my stomach at the thought of seeing it. i want to know what you think. i think it's great. i think it's a great coming—of—age movie. i think it's the implication of the valley in the 1970s. i think it's the evocation of the valley in the 1970s. it is brilliant and a lengthy use of music in it. i think they are brilliant in their first starring roles and i know... some of that i agree with. i think the two leads are just fantastic. both of them. and so captivating. the first 45 minutes to an hour i was loving it. and then it dips in the middle and i spoke to a lot of people who do agree with me they think it's too long and could have done with some editing and you see, the fundamental problem with that central premise of a 15—year—old boy and a 25—year—old woman. who are not having a relationship. but i'm trying not to say anything... it's not a plot spoiler. she doesn't say that. she has to get him off the phone and he finds her up and it's a really scary thing to do. did you like punch drunk love? i can't remember enough about it. punch drunk love is that items and their movie after having made my brilliant they said what will you do now and he said will make a 90 minute comedy with adam sandler and he did. it has turned out to be a marmite film and it's currently in the lead for the best film nominations. it looks beautiful. it's beautifully made and i love the two performances. love them. let us consolidate that part of you that we like that. this might have to go in they do i have to watch it again? you gave it a fair hearing. i just love it. i've seen it three times. we may never agree on that one. and streaming? dvd? tragedy of macbeth has come to apple tv. i think it looks brilliant. it has got a look of the set with german expressionism and great cast, denzel washington, have you seen it? no, very recently seen a stage production. i have seen a lot of versions of it. i admired it, but from a distance. i thought this looks really good, these individual performances are great but they all seem to be in their own movie and particularly when you see macbeth on stage, it's all about if they appear to be into different it's like where is the central conflict? so, people love it i've read loads of 5—star reviews, i feel the same way that you do about liqourice pizza. there are things in there that are great. but i'm not buying the whole thing. that's our theme for this week. thank you for watching and enjoy your cinema going. goodbye. this is bbc news with the latest headlines for viewers in the uk and around the world. i'm lukwesa burak. novak djokovic's legal team try to stop his deportion from australia, after his visa is cancelled, again. downing street apologises to the queen after two parties were held at number 10 the night before the funeral of the duke of edinburgh. it was a time of national mourning, and covid rules meant indoor mixing was banned. the us accuses russia of sending saboteurs into ukraine to justify an invasion. lawyers for virginia giuffre, who's bringing a civil case against prince andrew for sexual assault, file formal requests to obtain evidence from two people in britain. and a hero's welcome for polar preet — challenging stereotypes after her solo expedition