cuthberts church in fishel egg, the village that flooded two years ago today and i will speak to residents today and i will speak to residents to find out what they expect from cop26 and how they expect to adapt to flooding in the future. the world food programme warns that millions in afghanistan will die if the international community doesn't help. the united states reopens its borders to fully vaccinated uk visitors. and, tributes to a world war two veteran, and the dog who saved his life. mps will hold an emergency debate on parliamentary standards later, as the government continues to come under fire over allegations of sleaze and corruption. the prime minister has been criticised for his handling of the case of conservative mp, owen paterson, who resigned last week following a row over lobbying rules. the labour leader, sir keir starmer is demanding an apology from the prime minister for his handling of the events. the liberal democrats want an independent inquiry. our political correspondent, chris mason, reports. mps return here today to debate the standards and rules of this place after the best part of a week of rows about sleazy behaviour. it all began when the former cabinet minister owen paterson broke the rules by making the case to ministers and others on behalf of companies that were paying him. butjust when parliament was expected to chuck him out for a bit, the government ordered its mps to back at least a delay to that and a review of the disciplinary system. that provoked a boiling angerfrom many, and the government changed its mind. any review would not be applicable to mr paterson. he then gave up as an mp. the labour leader sir keir starmer will lead his party's response in the debate this afternoon and will say that the prime minister should apologise to the country. sir keir will hope that having long struggled to get the better of borisjohnson in the opinion polls that this whole saga might just help him. the debate was secured by a new liberal democrat mp who used to be a police officer. the government have driven a coach and horses through the standards process that is agreed on a cross party and house basis. i thought it important mps have the opportunity to vent frustrations at that and look at where we go next. this has been a difficult few days for the government and for parliament. we can expect plenty of anger and anguish later on. chris mason, bbc news. let's get more from our chief political correspondent adam fleming. what happens next? good question and we are waiting — what happens next? good question and we are waiting to _ what happens next? good question and we are waiting to find _ what happens next? good question and we are waiting to find out. _ what happens next? good question and we are waiting to find out. what - we are waiting to find out. what will happen at lunchtime just after lunchtime, three hours of debate and keir starmer will turn up for the labour party and will speak for them. he is demanding the prime minister turns up and speaks for the government with number ten not committing to that yet and also understand that the pm is out and about on a visit, so might not be in the vicinity of westminster when this is happening and then everyone is waiting to find out what the speaker of the house of commons, lindsay hoyle does, speculation he might make some sort of statement and he might set up a committee to look at the whole matter and how the rules will be working in parliament for second jobs and that will be a momentous moment. possibly less momentous moment. possibly less momentous if he does not do that. and you can see why the prime minister might not want to turn up for something like this. first of all, he is not obliged to, because of the debate prompted by the opposition party, and would he really want to sit there and listen to people like chris bryant, the chair of the standards committee, saying things like this. i chair of the standards committee, saying things like this.— saying things like this. i think we were corrupted _ saying things like this. i think we were corrupted last _ saying things like this. i think we were corrupted last week. - saying things like this. i think we were corrupted last week. i - saying things like this. i think we j were corrupted last week. i think the government walked us into a quagmire — the government walked us into a quagmire. i've spoken to lots of conservative mps over the last few days, _ conservative mps over the last few days, all_ conservative mps over the last few days, all of— conservative mps over the last few days, all of whom have said to me, i have _ days, all of whom have said to me, i have no_ days, all of whom have said to me, i have no idea — days, all of whom have said to me, i have no idea why the government chose _ have no idea why the government chose to — have no idea why the government chose to try and completely blow up the whole _ chose to try and completely blow up the whole standard system just to protect _ the whole standard system just to protect one person. i am the chair of the _ protect one person. i am the chair of the standards committee and i want _ of the standards committee and i want us _ of the standards committee and i want us to— of the standards committee and i want us to move forward and i want first of— want us to move forward and i want first of all_ want us to move forward and i want first of all to — want us to move forward and i want first of all to make sure that we come _ first of all to make sure that we come to— first of all to make sure that we come to a — first of all to make sure that we come to a clear decision on the owen paterson _ come to a clear decision on the owen paterson case and i hope we can do that tomorrow if the government tabled _ that tomorrow if the government tabled the motion today. that that tomorrow if the government tabled the motion today.- that tomorrow if the government tabled the motion today. that is a reference to _ tabled the motion today. that is a reference to what _ tabled the motion today. that is a reference to what chris _ tabled the motion today. that is a reference to what chris bryant - tabled the motion today. that is a i reference to what chris bryant wants from this, he wants parliament to vote on his report into owen paterson, which was the cause of all of this last week and he says even though owen paterson has stood down as an mp, chris bryant thinks it's important that parliament still approves the findings against him when he was an mp. as far as the government is concerned, they are sticking to their position they've had for the last few days, that the system still does need to be reformed and they would still like to insert an appeals process so mps can challenge findings that are laid against them but admitting that linking that systematic change with the individual case of owen paterson was a mistake, and here is how the international trade secretary put it. , ., ., , international trade secretary put it. the standard systems we have a look into individual— it. the standard systems we have a look into individual situations - it. the standard systems we have a look into individual situations when j look into individual situations when they come — look into individual situations when they come up and those have been dealt _ they come up and those have been dealt with— they come up and those have been dealt with and indeed the debate this afternoon will continue again. i this afternoon will continue again. i don't _ this afternoon will continue again. i don't consider there is a need for an enquiry. — i don't consider there is a need for an enquiry, because i don't think there _ an enquiry, because i don't think there is— an enquiry, because i don't think there is a — an enquiry, because i don't think there is a wider problem here. yesterday— there is a wider problem here. yesterday we had a cabinet minister saint was— yesterday we had a cabinet minister saint was a — yesterday we had a cabinet minister saint was a storm in the westminster teacup— saint was a storm in the westminster teacup and _ saint was a storm in the westminster teacup and we had john major say that this — teacup and we had john major say that this government was politically corrupt _ that this government was politically corrupt |f— that this government was politically corru t. ~ , corrupt. if the prime minister doesnt corrupt. if the prime minister doesn't turn _ corrupt. if the prime minister doesn't turn up _ corrupt. if the prime minister doesn't turn up today, - corrupt. if the prime minister doesn't turn up today, does l corrupt. if the prime minister. doesn't turn up today, does that send a message to the public, to the press, that he doesn't really think this is a big deal?— this is a big deal? certainly the opposition _ this is a big deal? certainly the opposition parties _ this is a big deal? certainly the opposition parties will- this is a big deal? certainly the opposition parties will hope - this is a big deal? certainly the l opposition parties will hope that this is a big deal? certainly the . opposition parties will hope that is how the public perceive it. that is why keir starmer is hyping up this is a big event and demanding the prime minister is there. the problem is that the parliamentary procedure behind all of this does not make this a set piece event. this is an emergency debate triggered by the opposition parties and there is a vote, but it is a procedural vote saying the debate has been held and it doesn't bind the government to do anything. it's not a proposal to change any rules or anything like that so borisjohnson change any rules or anything like that so boris johnson could change any rules or anything like that so borisjohnson could make the argument that this is just a lot of talking and not a lot of doing which is why a come back to my original point that all eyes are on the speaker because in this process today, he is the one that has the power to change the political weather and start a new process and i imagine he will be listening to the strength of feeling in the house of commons today and making a decision based on that. and i also wonder if this will be opportunities for backbenchers to go on the record. do we see conservative backbenchers who are annoyed that they were forced to vote for something they didn't much like last week for the government to change its mind 2a hours later, so the scope for some backbench dissent there and owen paterson support is still absolutely believe he was treated badly and his name should be cleared. will they use this as an opportunity to make that case again? also some mps are just not very happy with the parliamentary standards watchdog stop do they take this as an opportunity to put those concerns on the record as well? the story could go in a few possible directions. just after 930, we'll talk to a conserative mp who voted last wk to pause the suspension of owen paterson. we asked over 60 conservative mps to come on this morning — almost all said they weren't available, declined to come on, or didn't respond. and this afternoon you can watch the parliamentary standards debate live from half past three this afternoon. the united states has this morning reopened its borders to fully vaccinated travellers from the uk and dozens of other countries. the easing of restrictions — which were originally imposed by former president donald trump at the height of the covid—i9 pandemic — means that some families, which have been separated for more than a year and a half, can finally be re—united. our transport correspondent caroline davies reports. the president has made a decision to suspend all travel to the united kingdom and ireland effective midnight. the doors closed almost 20 months ago. since then, most uk citizens haven't been able to travel to the us. today, that changes. if you are double—jabbed and have had a negative test before you travel. nadine last saw her family in december 2019. she has missed both her siblings' weddings, watching online from the uk. she found the announcement that she can travel bittersweet. i bawled my eyes out. i think it was a mixture of elation and also frustration and even a bit of, i'd say a bit of grief, because, i don't know, grieving the loss of knowing i have missed out on massive life events with everybody. i said to my sister, i will not believe we are there until we have literally set foot outside of los angeles airport. when we are on us soil and everything has gone to plan. the way we work might have changed, but it is still difficult for all business to be done over video call. in our business we have to get physically close to customers to take their measurements and understand how they like their clothing to feel and fit. carl emery estimated his business in the us is down 75%. he was the only one on his team who could travel because he is married to a us citizen. but it wasn't easy. i have been held anywhere between two hours and eight hours before that interview. have to always carry a wedding certificate and photographs of children and passport with me to be able to gain entry. restarting the route between the uk and us is also a major boost for the travel industry. estimated to be worth over £14 billion a year. manchester airport will restart multiple routes this week. we know by talking to businesses in the north that there is a great opportunity to stimulate the trade between the uk and us. we will do everything we can to support that growth. back in early august, the uk allowed double—jabbed us citizens to come to the uk without needing to quarantine. but some argue that the real impact won't be felt until it goes both ways. even though the uk border was opened first, you still didn't really see a strong pick—up in travel, even though of course some people took advantage and made travel work. after nearly two years, for some, today is likely to be an emotional day. caroline's at heathrow for us this morning. how is it? busy, i would how is it? busy, iwould say. there's been _ how is it? busy, iwould say. there's been so _ how is it? busy, iwould say. there's been so many - how is it? busy, iwould say. there's been so many times| how is it? busy, iwould say. - there's been so many times over the course of this year where i have gone to airports and it's been completely empty undead but you cannot say the same today. early on there was a queue out the door for virgin atlantic where people were waiting to get through and there is a lot more paperwork this time round as well as your normal visa and the visa waiver to travel to america. in addition you need to make sure you can show your vaccination status and that you have had a covid test and you have tested negative for 72 hours before travel but it's also quite an emotional day for many people travelling today. i spoke to a woman who was travelling to visit her daughter and had not seen her for two years and today happens to be her birthday, so a great birthday present for her. there's also plenty of excitement for the travel industry as well with people here from the airways waving flags, holding pom—poms, dressed up for the day. this is a big day for the travel industry. this is one of the final pieces of the puzzle for them. international travel has been reopened over the course of the last few months but the usa is a crucial long haul route for many people travelling from the uk and today that route, the vast majority, is reopening. that route, the vast ma'ority, is reopeningfi that route, the vast ma'ority, is reopening. as the un climate change conference enters its second week, the uk has pledged 290 million pounds, to help poorer countries cope with the impact of climate change. the money has been described by the foreign office as �*new funding'. it ties in with the theme of the day at cop26, which is adaption, loss and damage. adaptation refers to the changes that have to made across the world, in order to deal with everyday impacts of climate change. loss and damage highlights the negative effect climate change has already had on our planet. some of the countries who have contributed least to the problem are the ones that have suffered the most. that's why one of the key targets of the summit, is for richer nations to come up with $100 billion dollars worth of funding, to help poorer nations. earlier the international trade secretary, anne marie trevelyan, explained how some of that uk funding might be spent. this is about the practical local solutions, so when i've been travelling all year as international ambassador for cop26 i've travelling all year as international ambassadorfor cop26 i've met ambassador for cop26 i've met families ambassadorfor cop26 i've met families where for instance historically rain fed agriculture has been the norm for agriculture, and the changes in weather patterns that are in place and will be there for many years even if we fix the c02 for many years even if we fix the co2 challenges tomorrow, those patterns have changed and they need to alter how they have their watercourses to be able to farm the land, so practical solutions to doing that. i met some cocoa farmers we need to plan different trees to provide shade for the cocoa plants because the changing climate means the cocoa plant, which is a very susceptible planting temperature, needs more protection, so helping at a very local level for communities to alter how they live and work so they can continue to do so in that area. so adaptation is a part and perhaps hysterically elected where mitigation had an urgent focus following the paris agreement. people in fishlake in south yorkshire have suffered from severe flooding. some have only recently been able to get back to their homes after they were inundated two years ago. let's cross there now and join bbc weather presenter simon king. iam in i am in fishlake and saint cuthberts church is to the left of me, which acted as a hub, and you have the flood plain of the river don and it is running quite low but it was a different story two years ago today when 90% of fishlake flooded. so what happened? there was a slow—moving weather system that brought about 50 to 100 millimetres of rainfall from humberto sheffield. that meant a month worth of rain falling for fishlake in 2a hours, but before that there was a huge amount of rainfall falling from south yorkshire and this graphic shows the dark blues indicative of six months of rain falling in six weeks, so the river don was completely saturated on the water had nowhere to go but to flood the village and we have seen the climate change already. in the uk, rainfall, we've had six of the last ten wetting ? wettest year since 1998 in what will happen in the future? the science is clear. the physics tells us for every 1 c warming science is clear. the physics tells us for every1 c warming in the atmosphere, we are likely to see a 7% increase in moisture in the atmosphere ready to be rained out and potentially cause more flooding in the future and the met office haveissued in the future and the met office have issued a report saying that river flooding as we saw in fishlake in 2019 is about 17 times more likely in the warming world. i'm joined by one of the residency from fishlake, justin smith and he's going to tell me about the flooding here. what happened to you, justin? welcome to sunny fishlake and it's a very different scene to two years ago _ very different scene to two years ago the — very different scene to two years ago. the flood plain was full of water— ago. the flood plain was full of water at — ago. the flood plain was full of water at that stage. i remember keeping — water at that stage. i remember keeping an eye on the website all day and _ keeping an eye on the website all day and watching the river levels slowly _ day and watching the river levels slowly increase and get more and more _ slowly increase and get more and more worried as we went through the day and _ more worried as we went through the day and then the next station down the river— day and then the next station down the river started to drop, seven or eight _ the river started to drop, seven or eight o'clock in the evening and i remember— eight o'clock in the evening and i remember going to bed about 930 thinking, _ remember going to bed about 930 thinking, we offer it, have escaped. you thought— thinking, we offer it, have escaped. you thought you would be flooded? at about 11 o'clock that night there was a _ about 11 o'clock that night there was a bang on the door and somebody shouted, _ was a bang on the door and somebody shouted, you've got to get out to mate, _ shouted, you've got to get out to mate. it — shouted, you've got to get out to mate. it is — shouted, you've got to get out to mate, it is coming. that was the start _ mate, it is coming. that was the start. ., ., ., ., ., start. you had no idea that fishlake could flood? _ start. you had no idea that fishlake could flood? i— start. you had no idea that fishlake could flood? i knew _ start. you had no idea that fishlake could flood? i knew it _ start. you had no idea that fishlake could flood? i knew it could, - start. you had no idea that fishlake could flood? i knew it could, but. start. you had no idea that fishlake could flood? i knew it could, but i l could flood? i knew it could, but i thou~ht could flood? i knew it could, but i thought we'd _ could flood? i knew it could, but i thought we'd escaped. _ could flood? i knew it could, but i thought we'd escaped. a - could flood? i knew it could, but i thought we'd escaped. a torrid i could flood? i knew it could, but i l thought we'd escaped. a torrid time durin: that thought we'd escaped. a torrid time during that flooding _ thought we'd escaped. a torrid time during that flooding and _ thought we'd escaped. a torrid time during that flooding and it's - thought we'd escaped. a torrid time during that flooding and it's led - during that flooding and it's led you to contribute to this book that the fishlake residents have done. tell me more. b, the fishlake residents have done. tell me more.— tell me more. a team of us came toaether tell me more. a team of us came together in _ tell me more. a team of us came together in the _ tell me more. a team of us came together in the beginning - tell me more. a team of us came together in the beginning of - tell me more. a team of us came j together in the beginning of 2020 and had _ together in the beginning of 2020 and had a — together in the beginning of 2020 and had a meeting in the village frorn _ and had a meeting in the village from which decided to put together the book— from which decided to put together the book which basically encapsulates the stories of many of the residents of the village, what they have — the residents of the village, what they have been through, and we did it primarily— they have been through, and we did it primarily for two reasons. one was to— it primarily for two reasons. one was to thank all of the people who came _ was to thank all of the people who came to _ was to thank all of the people who came to our assistance after the flood _ came to our assistance after the flood because we had fantastic support— flood because we had fantastic support from all over the country, and the _ support from all over the country, and the other was to try to generate some _ and the other was to try to generate some cash— and the other was to try to generate some cash we can hopefully provide to other— some cash we can hopefully provide to other areas potentially impacted in the _ to other areas potentially impacted in the future. one of the great things— in the future. one of the great things has— in the future. one of the great things has been ed miliband, who is our local— things has been ed miliband, who is our local mp and is heavily involved in the _ our local mp and is heavily involved in the cop26 programme and ed was here at— in the cop26 programme and ed was here at the _ in the cop26 programme and ed was here at the church in mid—september when— here at the church in mid—september whenwe— here at the church in mid—september when we launched the book and has been a _ when we launched the book and has been a great advocate and supporter of it. ,, . been a great advocate and supporter of it, ,, . ., ., been a great advocate and supporter of it. ,, . ., ., . of it. since the flooding occurred there have _ of it. since the flooding occurred there have been _ of it. since the flooding occurred there have been repairs - of it. since the flooding occurred there have been repairs to - of it. since the flooding occurred there have been repairs to flood| there have been repairs to flood defences and more investment in the flood defences. pare defences and more investment in the flood defences.— flood defences. are you confident that fishlake _ flood defences. are you confident that fishlake is _ flood defences. are you confident that fishlake is not _ flood defences. are you confident that fishlake is not going - flood defences. are you confident that fishlake is not going to - flood defences. are you confident that fishlake is not going to floodj that fishlake is not going to flood again? what are your concerns going forward? .,. , again? what are your concerns going forward? .. , ., ., forward? exactly, the more we hear from cop26, _ forward? exactly, the more we hear from come, the _ forward? exactly, the more we hear from cop26, the more _ forward? exactly, the more we hear from cop26, the more we _ forward? exactly, the more we hear from cop26, the more we hear- forward? exactly, the more we hear. from cop26, the more we hear about the potential for the future stop i will be _ the potential for the future stop i will be honest, where i am at this moment— will be honest, where i am at this moment in— will be honest, where i am at this moment in time is thinking that i'm potentially — moment in time is thinking that i'm potentially looking to leave the village — potentially looking to leave the village i— potentially looking to leave the village. i don't want to have to go village. idon't want to have to go through— village. i don't want to have to go through it — village. i don't want to have to go through it i— village. i don't want to have to go through it. i think this is the key message — through it. i think this is the key message we would like to put out. nohody— message we would like to put out. nobody should ever have to go through— nobody should ever have to go through what we went through on that night _ through what we went through on that night. certainly not more than once. how long _ night. certainly not more than once. how long did it take you to get back to where you are now from that day? sadly, moving into 2020, iwas to where you are now from that day? sadly, moving into 2020, i was in a caravan _ sadly, moving into 2020, i was in a caravan on — sadly, moving into 2020, i was in a caravan on the drive and the whole of the _ caravan on the drive and the whole of the downstairs of the house had been _ of the downstairs of the house had been decimated and for me, the reinstatement work was due to have started _ reinstatement work was due to have started on— reinstatement work was due to have started on the 24th of march and on the 23rd _ started on the 24th of march and on the 23rd of— started on the 24th of march and on the 23rd of march we went into lockdown, so that was two months where _ lockdown, so that was two months where nothing happened. by late 2020, _ where nothing happened. by late 2020, the house has pretty much been sorted _ 2020, the house has pretty much been sorted out, _ 2020, the house has pretty much been sorted out, i'm glad to say and i actually— sorted out, i'm glad to say and i actually managed to sell the house earlier— actually managed to sell the house earlier this year. but there are friends — earlier this year. but there are friends in _ earlier this year. but there are friends in the village who will be speaking — friends in the village who will be speaking to later who are still having — speaking to later who are still having worked on even at this stage. i having worked on even at this stage. i had _ having worked on even at this stage. i had a _ having worked on even at this stage. i had a flick— having worked on even at this stage. i had a flick through the book last night and what i get a sense of in the book is that it is very community spirited around here and the church behind us acted as a hub for the community, lots of stories in there and it felt like the whole village came together. it certainly did. that village came together. it certainly did- that was _ village came together. it certainly did. that was one _ village came together. it certainly did. that was one of _ village came together. it certainly did. that was one of the - village came together. it certainly did. that was one of the fantastic| did. that was one of the fantastic things— did. that was one of the fantastic things that came out of the whole horrible _ things that came out of the whole horrible situation we went through, the unity— horrible situation we went through, the unity and the strength of the community. the unity and the strength of the community-— the unity and the strength of the community. the unity and the strength of the communi . . ., ., ., . community. and how about now? when ou look community. and how about now? when you look out — community. and how about now? when you look out at — community. and how about now? when you look out at the _ community. and how about now? when you look out at the river _ community. and how about now? when you look out at the river don _ community. and how about now? when you look out at the river don as - community. and how about now? when you look out at the river don as it - you look out at the river don as it is now, do you check the weather forecast regularly? do you look at the river levels and get nervous? i certainly keep an eye on things, absolutely, but fortunately we had a fantastic _ absolutely, but fortunately we had a fantastic dry spell so far this autumn— fantastic dry spell so far this autumn and long may it continue. thank— autumn and long may it continue. thank you — autumn and long may it continue. thank you forjoining us and i'm glad you're back on your feet after that torrid time. so adaptation is the theme for cop26 today and we will be finding out later in the day how we can adapt to flooding in the uk in the future. the head of the world food programme has condemned the international community for not stepping in to avert a potentially devastating famine in afghanistan. the organisation is warning that millions of people will die within weeks if the international community doesn't help. david beasley has described the next six months as potentially "hell on ea rth" for the country. it is as bad as you can possibly imagine, infact, we it is as bad as you can possibly imagine, in fact, we are looking at the worst humanitarian crisis on earth. 95% of the people don't have enough food, and now we are looking at 23,000,000 people marching towards starvation and out of that, almost 9,000,000 are knocking on the door. the winter months are coming and we are coming out of a drought on the next six months are going to be catastrophic. our world affairs editorjohn simpson is currently in bamiyan in central afghanistan. he gave us an update on how desperate the situation is on the ground. well, it's getting bad. and what the world food programme people and david beasley and others are trying to do is attract the world's attention not to a disaster that is under way, attention not to a disaster that is underway, but attention not to a disaster that is under way, but a disaster that could happen really within a matter of weeks. so here i am in bamiyan, one of the main centres of hunger and also the place where the taliban 20 years ago blew up the 6th century figures of the border. you wouldn't really get much sense that there was hunger right now, because the shops have got a lot of food, particularly fruit, which has been grown over the last few months. but there has been a serious drought here and in other parts of afghanistan and that is causing all sorts of problems. i went to seejust causing all sorts of problems. i went to see just this morning a widow who has seven children and lives virtually in a hutjust off the mountain almost beside the border and her children are aged between 16 down to about three, and her husband died some months ago and she is absolutely on her last legs in terms of knowing how she is going to feed the children. it's extraordinarily moving to speak to her. i have to tell you, it was difficult to listen to her without tears running down yourface. but she, like millions of people in this country canjust get she, like millions of people in this country can just get by at the moment, and directly the weather gets worse, she will be in serious trouble. a video that shows a hunt member hitting and kicking a horse has been widely condemned. it was uploaded to twitter by a group of anti—hunt activists and has since been viewed more than a million times. it is really upsetting. let's talk to our correspondent sean dilley. you are blind and you have had this described to you.— described to you. yes, and it's really important _ described to you. yes, and it's really important when - described to you. yes, and it's really important when you - described to you. yes, and it's really important when you say| described to you. yes, and it's - really important when you say that some viewers might find this extremely distressing. if we pop it up extremely distressing. if we pop it up on screen, this 27 second clip was posted to twitter by the hertfordshire hunt sabah tours on sunday and they said they filmed it on saturday. it's had more than 2,000,000 views since it was posted and the point you reference, we will give an audio description for those who may not be able to see the video. the video shows a horse box and a horse trotting away from it and a horse trotting away from it and the rider is fair to say is being quite rough with the horse, kicking the horse and slapping at it before it is led into a horse box. the hertfordshire hunt saboteurs say on their twitter profile that they use nonviolent direct action to protect and save wildlife. the footage does show, and we will stress the 27 seconds of what was a wide incident, what has been shown has prompted the animal welfare charity the rspca to investigate it and they've released a statement saying that this footage is really upsetting and we will always look into complaints made to us about animal welfare and we would urge anyone with first hand information about this incident to contact us. thank you very much. we will show it to you again. it's really, really upsetting. so, look away if you don't want to see this, and what you can see is a member of the hunt kicking the horse and then whacking it around its nose and mouth and face. the rspca appealing for members of the hunt to get in touch with them in orderfor them to the hunt to get in touch with them in order for them to investigate and we hope to talk to the rspca live later on. thank you very much, sean. a bus has been hijacked and set on fire near a loyalist estate on the outskirts of belfast. police say four men boarded the double decker and ordered passengers and the driver off, before setting it alight. it's the second bus to be set on fire in northern ireland within a week. a new space telescope, described as one of the greatest scientific endeavours of the 21st century, is on track to launch next month. scientists hope the james webb space telescope — which is the size of a tennis court — will be able to shed light on how the very first stars ignited in space. the project has cost around 600 million pounds so far. now it's time for a look at the weather, let's cross the newsroom to carol thank you. good morning everyone. mixed fortunes with the weather, central and eastern areas started on a chilly and sunny nodes and in the west we have more cloud and rain, and that rain will push eastward through the course of the day with a cloud advancing ahead of it and for some central and southern areas it will stay dry, and it will be another breezy day with the strongest winds across the north and west but nowhere near as windy as at the weekend. temperatures today are ten in the north to about 50 as a top temperature in belfast. through the evening and overnight we say goodbye to the first weather front and the second comes in bringing more rain as it sinks south it will turn weaker, so the rain in it will be light and patria. the winds will ease and it will be another mild night and milder than the start we had to date ? light and patchy. tomorrow here is the weather front sinking south with spots of rain and the rain will pick up and either side there is some sunshine but we also have heavy showers crossing scotland and getting into northern ireland. hello this is bbc news. the headlines: the government rejects calls for a public inquiry into corruption, after it tried to change the sytem that found one of its mps guilty of breaking lobbying rules. the government promises £290 million to help poorer nations cope with climate change. the world food programme warns that millions in afghanistan will die if the international community doesn't help. the united states reopens its borders to fully vaccinated uk visitors. and, tributes to a world war two veteran, and the dog who saved his life. sport, and a full round up from the bbc sport centre. good morning. west ham manager david moyes has told supporters "why not dream of the title" after his side beat liverpool to end their 25—game unbeaten run. 3—2 it finished, a win that moves them up to third in the table. they took the lead through pablo fornals's corner which went in off alison. liverpool equalised through this free kick from trent alexandor arnold before goals from fornals and kurt zouma sealed the win. liverpool did score late on but west ham hung on to end liverpool's 25—game unbeaten run. so what about their chances of winning the title? i see us challenging whoever are the top four. whoever the top four are going to be, i don't know. we might be one of them. whoever they are i want to see if we can challenge them and give ourselves an opportunity. we missed out on the champions league last year by two points, which we were disappointed with. so, why should we not be looking at a chance of being around there? but we are certainly not getting carried away. we are obviously not one of the two teams which could run away at the moment. but, you know, look, we had a really long run without defeat. we actually never thought about it, to be honest. we had too many draws from our perspective in that spell as well. so now this run is over, good, let's start another run. rangers are fast becoming the comeback kings. they recovered after going a goal down for the fifth game in a row, beating ross county 4—2. ryan kent was making his first start since september due to injury and he put in a man—of—the—match performance, including a stunning goal. that extended their unbeaten run to eight games and took them four points clear of celtic at the top of the table. st albans — who play in the sixth tier of english football — enjoyed an incredible win in the first round of the fa cup. they knocked out the league two leaders forest green rovers — shaunjeffers sealing the 3—2 win. the st albans part—time squad includes a postman, an engineer and a personal shopper. they all played their part, as did the fans who roared them on. there's no stopping arsenal in the women's super league after maintaining their perfect start to the season — a 4—0 win coming against west ham. kim little scored twice, taking her tally to 50 wsl goals. arsenal have won all six of their league matches this season and the win restored their three—point lead at the top. max verstappen won the mexico city grand prix to extend his lead in the title battle with lewis hamilton. verstappen started third on the grid but overtook both mercedes on the opening straight and never looked back. he now leads the drivers�* championship by 19 points with four races left. natalie pirks reports. in this make—or—break race, a good start was essential for lewis hamilton. lights out and away we go here. the first few corners in mexico usually provide fireworks and this time was no different. verstappen is in to the lead. a nightmare start for mercedes saw bottas spin and hamilton stuck behind the one man he had to beat. and as he complained about his tyres, red bull's local hero sergio perez was gaining on him. after both hamilton and verstappen had stopped it was perez who briefly led his home race, revelling in the adoration. meanwhile sparks flew for bottas, just not in a good way. a day to forget while his team—mate hamilton was coming under serious pressure. hamilton just about managed to stave off the attack as verstappen cruised to a dominant victory. he wins the mexico city grand prix. but there was no doubt who was declared winner. sergio perez the first mexican to finish on the podium here. fiesta time. natalie pirks, bbc news. scotland continued their brilliant start to rugby union's autumn internationls — beating australia at murrayfield by 15 points to 13, to make it three wins in a row over the wallabies. debutant ewan ashman scored scotland's second try after the break with a brilliant finish, but the decisive points came from the boot of finn russell as his penalty gave scotland the edge. another brilliant win for england's women over new zealand — their biggest against the black ferns. 56—15 it finished as the red roses ran in seven tries. it sealed another memorable win for england against a side they will look to rival for the world cup next year. jasminejoyce scored two tries as wales women ended their 32—month wait for a victory. they beat japan by 23 points to 5 in cardiff. grand slam—winning sisters serena and venus williams say more needs to be done to tackle racism in tennis and across sport. the tennis superstars told radio 5 live breakfast they hope they continue to inspire and have helped to break broundaries to bring the next generation through. there a tonne of steps that still need to be made and stilljust has to be made in sport and not only in tennis but, as we saw from the football match, in every sport ever, so i think it's importantjust to keep going and be the best that you can. yeah, but i think it's also important for people to continue to break barriers and the best part is if you are good enough and if you are great enough then you open the way for other people and i think generations behind us are able to just play tennis and hopefully not have to focus so much on the colour of their skin. that's all the sport for now. mps will take part in an emergency debate later to discuss parliamentary standards. allegations of sleaze and corruption — in the wake of the resignation of tory mp owen paterson. one of the mps who voted with the government to put owen paterson's suspension on hold and review the parliamentary standards watchdog was richard graham. he's the conservative mp for gloucester. thank you for coming on today. it was difficult to find a tory mp who voted as you did to was difficult to find a tory mp who voted as you did to talk was difficult to find a tory mp who voted as you did to talk about was difficult to find a tory mp who voted as you did to talk about it was difficult to find a tory mp who voted as you did to talk about it on air. we asked 60 and they said they were not available, they declined all they did not respond, so thank you for talking to our audience. i understand you havejust you for talking to our audience. i understand you have just tested positive for covid so we are appreciative. were you used by your prime minister last week? , , , ~ ., ,, ., last week? possibly. although i know it is a bit hard — last week? possibly. although i know it is a bit hard to _ last week? possibly. although i know it is a bit hard to explain _ it is a bit hard to explain convincingly the truth of the amendment as i always felt this would come back to the house on an whipped basis to review the standards committee report. just because you _ standards committee report. just because you are using political jargon that some people might not understand that they might absolutely want to understand what is going on, you said possibly you are used by your prime minister last week. that is a heck of a thing to say. week. that is a heck of a thing to sa . ,., , week. that is a heck of a thing to sa . , ., , . ., , ., , say. governments come up with ideas and they try — say. governments come up with ideas and they try to — say. governments come up with ideas and they try to get — say. governments come up with ideas and they try to get them _ say. governments come up with ideas and they try to get them through - say. governments come up with ideas and they try to get them through the l and they try to get them through the house of commons and sometimes they turn out not to be the best idea and things come back in another where exactly as this has really within 2a hours of the vote last wednesday. was it worth putting your integrity on the line?— on the line? interestingly i do not think 0wen _ on the line? interestingly i do not think owen paterson _ on the line? interestingly i do not think owen paterson would - on the line? interestingly i do not think owen paterson would have l think owen paterson would have resigned on wednesday evening. i do not think he was in that frame of mind and the reason i voted with the government was less because of government pressure to encourage me to vote with them but more about the number of colleagues who said to me this is a really emotional business, owen has had his wife committed suicide, he stands to lose his reputation and hisjob, we owe it to her hand to see whether and only whether there could be an appeal process for him, and if that didn't work, which it didn't, as you know, then the standards committee report would come back to the house for a vote and that is effectively what has happened. did vote and that is effectively what has happened-— has happened. did you read to ourself has happened. did you read to yourself the — has happened. did you read to yourself the report _ has happened. did you read to yourself the report from - has happened. did you read to yourself the report from the i yourself the report from the parliamentary commissioner? yes. and did ou parliamentary commissioner? jazz and did you read herself the report from the house of commons standards committee?— the house of commons standards committee? yes. so you will know that committee _ committee? yes so you will know that committee said it had striven to ensure that mr paterson has had every opportunity to represent himself as fully as possible before the committee, in person and in writing, with extended deadlines that his request, accepted his request to be accompanied by his legal advisers. request to be accompanied by his legaladvisers. he request to be accompanied by his legal advisers. he was able to give that committee oral and written evidence but they did not believe him in the end. this evidence but they did not believe him in the end.— him in the end. as soon as i read the standards _ him in the end. as soon as i read the standards committee - him in the end. as soon as i read the standards committee reportl him in the end. as soon as i read - the standards committee report there was no doubt in my mind i am afraid, owen believes he did nothing wrong, but the report on whether he breached the rules on lobbying is very clear in the frame that he did. so why did you vote to oppose his suspension?— suspension? because of this key thin that suspension? because of this key thing that there _ suspension? because of this key thing that there is _ suspension? because of this key thing that there is no _ suspension? because of this key thing that there is no right - suspension? because of this key thing that there is no right of. thing that there is no right of appeal at the moment and for something as serious as this after what he has been through there was an emotional feeling we all did to him to pursue whether there could be an appeal process. as it turned out that was not remotely possible and so the vote is coming back to the house. d0 so the vote is coming back to the house. ,, so the vote is coming back to the house. ,., i. ., ~' so the vote is coming back to the house. i. ., ,, , house. do you not think it is disingenuous _ house. do you not think it is disingenuous to _ house. do you not think it is disingenuous to tell - house. do you not think it is disingenuous to tell the - house. do you not think it is l disingenuous to tell the public there is no appeals process? mr patterson sat in front of the cross—party committee. mps from all parties plus seven members of the public and put his case. he was appealing then. he was giving the written evidence. he was giving oral evidence. that was the appeals process. i evidence. that was the appeals rocess. , ., ., ., process. i understand that argument absolutely but _ process. i understand that argument absolutely but sometimes _ process. i understand that argument absolutely but sometimes in - process. i understand that argument absolutely but sometimes in life - process. i understand that argument absolutely but sometimes in life the | absolutely but sometimes in life the road is not always straight, but this has been a rather tortuous process, but it is taking place over about two days so i think we have got to where we need to be, which is that colleagues will vote for the report to be accepted, owen has resigned and that is the separate issue about whether the process needs to be reviewed and that should be separate and it will be. the needs to be reviewed and that should be separate and it will be.— be separate and it will be. the fact that ou be separate and it will be. the fact that you voted _ be separate and it will be. the fact that you voted to _ be separate and it will be. the fact that you voted to oppose - be separate and it will be. the fact that you voted to oppose his - that you voted to oppose his suspension when you have just told us there was no doubt in your mind that he breached the rules, that he promoted companies that were paying him over £100,000 a year, which broke the paid advocacy roles, banned by parliament, yet you voted to oppose his suspension, isn't that why people accuse your party of sleaze? i why people accuse your party of sleaze? ~ , ., why people accuse your party of sleaze? ~ ,., ., , , sleaze? i think the point really is that actually _ sleaze? i think the point really is that actually in _ sleaze? i think the point really is that actually in that _ sleaze? i think the point really is that actually in that amendment| that actually in that amendment which we passed it made it very clear that there were two options. one was to see whether there could be a separate appeal, as is the case for many employment tribunals, or whether the report should come back to the house and be voted on, and we have taken the second route. i know it looks odd. have taken the second route. i know it looks odd-— have taken the second route. i know it looks odd.- m _ have taken the second route. i know it looks odd. fillicit]? in my mind we it looks odd. odd? in my mind we have arrived _ it looks odd. odd? in my mind we have arrived at _ it looks odd. odd? in my mind we have arrived at the _ it looks odd. odd? in my mind we have arrived at the right place. personally i think it has been a very sad business for owen and many people involved and i understand it does not look good but we are where we are and will be voted on today. it looks odd, you said, it doesn't look good. let me read to this e—mail. never have i been so angry and all my 70 years. blatant sleaze, this government is destroying democracy. there are many more like that. do you accept that? i do democracy. there are many more like that. do you accept that?— that. do you accept that? i do not because what _ that. do you accept that? i do not because what has _ that. do you accept that? i do not because what has happened - that. do you accept that? i do not because what has happened this | because what has happened this democracy has succeeded. the amendment was ruled out once people decided not to participate in the select committee. we are having the vote, the result is clear because owen has resigned, so you could make the case that democracy has triumphed. what churchill said about the usa, invariably does the right thing, after exhausting other options. maybe that is the way to look at best. options. maybe that is the way to look at best-— look at best. surely you are not comparing _ look at best. surely you are not comparing the _ look at best. surely you are not comparing the current - look at best. surely you are not comparing the current prime i look at best. surely you are not - comparing the current prime minister borisjohnson to winston churchill over what boris johnson borisjohnson to winston churchill over what borisjohnson did last week. over what boris johnson did last week. ., , ., week. no, but i am comparing the oint week. no, but i am comparing the point about— week. no, but i am comparing the point about in _ week. no, but i am comparing the point about in politics _ week. no, but i am comparing the point about in politics it _ week. no, but i am comparing the point about in politics it is - week. no, but i am comparing the point about in politics it is not - point about in politics it is not always a straight line but if you get to the right decision that is what matters.— get to the right decision that is what matters. ., ., , ., ., what matters. you only got to the decision because _ what matters. you only got to the decision because of _ what matters. you only got to the decision because of the _ what matters. you only got to the decision because of the headlines| what matters. you only got to the l decision because of the headlines in the normally tory supporting newspapers and outcry from voters. it was not because borisjohnson or those around ten thought this is a really bad idea. this is crossing a line, this would show we are lacking in a moral compass. you line, this would show we are lacking in a moral compass.— line, this would show we are lacking in a moral compass. you could argue that but you — in a moral compass. you could argue that but you could _ in a moral compass. you could argue that but you could argue _ in a moral compass. you could argue that but you could argue what - in a moral compass. you could argue that but you could argue what i - in a moral compass. you could argue that but you could argue what i have| that but you could argue what i have just argued as the two options, one to look at an appeal on the other to bring the report back to the house for a vote and that is what is happening. for a vote and that is what is happening-— for a vote and that is what is haueninu. ., ., , ., for a vote and that is what is haueninu. ., ., ~ , happening. looking ahead, should mps be banned from — happening. looking ahead, should mps be banned from having _ happening. looking ahead, should mps be banned from having second - happening. looking ahead, should mps be banned from having second jobs? i be banned from having second jobs? as consultants are paid advisers. not doctors or lawyers potentially but as consultants are paid advisers to private companies.— to private companies. there are different views _ to private companies. there are different views on _ to private companies. there are different views on this. - to private companies. there are different views on this. i - to private companies. there are different views on this. i made l to private companies. there are | different views on this. i made a promise to constituents i would not take paid employment from anyone else for as long as i was their mp. there are people who are doctors, nurses, lawyers and the one who need to keep their qualifications up and william hague made the point some years ago when this was debated that effectively what you are saying what she would ban somebody from writing a really good book that sold well but it was ok to write a really bad one that nobody wanted to buy. i don't think hard and fast banners is the way forward but everything we do has to pass the smell test and the problem with this particular instance is did not.- problem with this particular instance is did not. argue shocked when patterson _ instance is did not. argue shocked when patterson was _ instance is did not. argue shocked when patterson was able - instance is did not. argue shocked when patterson was able to - instance is did not. argue shocked when patterson was able to vote l instance is did not. argue shocked l when patterson was able to vote on his own suspension last week and he voted to posit? that his own suspension last week and he voted to posit?— voted to posit? that is the real life it is at _ voted to posit? that is the real life it is at the _ voted to posit? that is the real life it is at the moment. - voted to posit? that is the real life it is at the moment. i - voted to posit? that is the real life it is at the moment. i am l voted to posit? that is the real. life it is at the moment. i am sure it will be changed. [30 life it is at the moment. i am sure it will be changed.— it will be changed. do you think it should be changed? _ it will be changed. do you think it should be changed? does - it will be changed. do you think it should be changed? does it - it will be changed. do you think it| should be changed? does it shock you an individual who has been found guilty of breaking the rules can vote on his own punishment? yes. guilty of breaking the rules can vote on his own punishment? yes, i think that is — vote on his own punishment? yes, i think that is an _ vote on his own punishment? yes, i think that is an odd _ vote on his own punishment? yes, i think that is an odd one. _ vote on his own punishment? yes, i think that is an odd one. there - vote on his own punishment? yes, i think that is an odd one. there are l think that is an odd one. there are a number of things in the process that will have to be reviewed and that will have to be reviewed and thatis that will have to be reviewed and that is certainly one of them. should the net investigate by all conservative party treasurers who donated £3 million to the party became lords? it is donated £3 million to the party became lords?— became lords? it is a slightly different sort _ became lords? it is a slightly different sort of— became lords? it is a slightly different sort of point. - became lords? it is a slightly different sort of point. yes i became lords? it is a slightly different sort of point. yes orj became lords? it is a slightly - different sort of point. yes or no. it is not different sort of point. yes or no. it is not so _ different sort of point. yes or no. it is not so much _ different sort of point. yes or no. it is not so much parliamentary . it is not so much parliamentary procedure as a wider question about integrity. procedure as a wider question about inteuri . , , integrity. exactly, it is about conservative _ integrity. exactly, it is about conservative party _ integrity. exactly, it is about| conservative party procedure integrity. exactly, it is about - conservative party procedure and integrity. i conservative party procedure and inteuri . ., ., ~' conservative party procedure and inteuri . ., ., ,, , ., integrity. i do not think we should t to integrity. i do not think we should try to make _ integrity. i do not think we should try to make party— integrity. i do not think we should try to make party political- integrity. i do not think we should try to make party political pointsl try to make party political points too much because there are seven whether labour mps who have been found criminally guilty in the courts in the last ten years. you 'ust courts in the last ten years. you just need _ courts in the last ten years. you just need a _ courts in the last ten years. you just need a party _ courts in the last ten years. you just need a party political point. only an answer to go one. there are people on all sides who do things that are wrong on the system has to make sure they get caught. bind that are wrong on the system has to make sure they get caught. and this auestion make sure they get caught. and this question that _ make sure they get caught. and this question that l _ make sure they get caught. and this question that i asked _ make sure they get caught. and this question that i asked about - question that i asked about whether the net should investigate by all conservative party treasurers who donated 3 million have become lords, yes or no? i donated 3 million have become lords, es or no? ., ., ., ., yes or no? i do not have a particular— yes or no? i do not have a particular problem - yes or no? i do not have a particular problem with i yes or no? i do not have a i particular problem with that. yes or no? i do not have a - particular problem with that. i have not looked to enter it in any great detail. . ~' , ., , not looked to enter it in any great detail. ., ,, , ., , . not looked to enter it in any great detail. . ~ , . detail. thank you very much. most mps we contacted _ detail. thank you very much. most mps we contacted would _ detail. thank you very much. most mps we contacted would not, - detail. thank you very much. most mps we contacted would not, and | detail. thank you very much. most| mps we contacted would not, and i know you have covid, so thank you very much. more e—mails and messages from you. neville says it is about an np only had thatjob. it should be a full—timejob. someone says boris johnson is doing well supporting his friends, bring on independence for scotland. someone says mps have a good job with a good salary and that should be their onlyjob. someone else says borisjohnson and his cronies want to do what they want. someone else says thickness of the news, talk about climate change. —— take this off of the nose. one of the parliamentarian said yesterday it is a storm in a westminster tea cup. do you agree? people in england eligible for covid booster vaccinations will — from today — be able to book an appointment up to a month in advance. it's hoped the change to the booking system will speed up the rollout of the boosterjabs. more than ten million people across the uk have already had their top—up vaccine. the chief executive of nhs england explained how easy it was for people to get theirjab. we have got more locations available for boosters than ever before. we are trying to make it as easy as possible for people to get access to their boosters. you can book online immediately you become eligible and even before you become eligible. you can also go on 199 orjust walk in where there are local walk—in centres available. joining me now is azeem majeed — who is a professor of primary care and public health at imperial college london. be clear with our audience, who is eligible right now?— be clear with our audience, who is eligible right now? people aged 50 and over, those _ eligible right now? people aged 50 and over, those who _ eligible right now? people aged 50 and over, those who work - eligible right now? people aged 50 and over, those who work for - eligible right now? people aged 50 and over, those who work for the l and over, those who work for the nhs, those who love our work in care homes, carers, people at risk of complications from covid—19, people with diabetes or kidney disease, quite a large number of people eligible. quite a large number of people eliaible. ~ ., ,, ~' quite a large number of people eliaible. ~ . ,, ~ ., eligible. what you think about the fact 4.6 million _ eligible. what you think about the fact 4.6 million have _ eligible. what you think about the fact 4.6 million have not- eligible. what you think about the fact 4.6 million have not yet - eligible. what you think about the fact 4.6 million have not yet had i fact 4.6 million have not yet had their first covid fact 4.6 million have not yet had theirfirst covid jab? fact 4.6 million have not yet had their first covid jab? that fact 4.6 million have not yet had their first covid jab?— their first covid “ab? that is concerning _ their first covid jab? that is concerning because - their first covid jab? that is concerning because there i their first covid jab? that isj concerning because there is their first covid jab? that is l concerning because there is a their first covid jab? that is - concerning because there is a high risk of death or serious illness if you are over 50 so it is a concern and we need to target that group as well as boosters. ido and we need to target that group as well as boosters.— well as boosters. do you think an hinu well as boosters. do you think anything can _ well as boosters. do you think anything can be _ well as boosters. do you think anything can be said _ well as boosters. do you think anything can be said that - well as boosters. do you thinkl anything can be said that would well as boosters. do you think - anything can be said that would be encouraging them to come forward? we encouraging them to come forward? - now face higher rates of covid—19 across the uk, 30,000 cases per day, the risk of being infected, if you are infected you might have serious illness or transnet to your parents or grandparents or work colleagues. that is what people like yourself and public health officials have been seeing since the vaccine programme was available. yes. been seeing since the vaccine programme was available. yes, so i think the key _ programme was available. yes, so i thinkthe key is— programme was available. yes, so i think the key is working _ programme was available. yes, so i think the key is working with - programme was available. yes, so i think the key is working with local l think the key is working with local nhs teams, particularly gps and pharmacists, who know their populations well, they can target people who have not been vaccinated or had boosters and they can address problems around vaccine hesitancy. i think those are things that can be addressed by local health care professionals working with local populations. professionals working with local populations-— professionals working with local n-oulations. ., ., ., populations. important to say that all four of that _ populations. important to say that all four of that first _ populations. important to say that all four of that first jab _ populations. important to say that all four of that first jab is - populations. important to say that all four of that first jab is there. i all four of that first jab is there. there is no time limit, no deadline, you can have it whenever, but sooner rather than later, please. you you can have it whenever, but sooner rather than later, please.— rather than later, please. you can make an appointment _ rather than later, please. you can make an appointment or - rather than later, please. you can make an appointment or book- rather than later, please. you can make an appointment or book an | rather than later, please. you can l make an appointment or book an so please take that opportunity have you have not done already. thank you for talkinu you have not done already. thank you for talking to — you have not done already. thank you for talking to us. _ twitter users have voted for the world's richest man, elon musk, to increase his tax bill by selling 10% of his shares in his electric carmaker, tesla — a sale that at current prices would be worth around twenty—one billion dollars. mr musk conducted the poll, in response to us government proposals to raise taxes on the country's billionaires. he claimed that, because he doesn't take a salary or bonuses from any of his companies, he has no earnings to pay tax on. he had promised to abide by the result of the poll. an italian court has sentenced seventy criminals linked to a powerful gang — in the first phase of the country's largest mafia trial in more than thirty years. judges handed six of those convicted the maximum twenty—year sentence that prosecutors had asked for. the proceedings are expected to last for another two years. the bbc�*s tim allman reports. their shadow has hung over italy for decades. a web of criminal activity. a history of robbery, kidnapping, drug smuggling and murder. now, in this specially adapted courtroom in southern italy, some of the �*ndrangheta finally face justice. translation: today we have an important sentence. - 91 defendants, 70 found guilty. i am not afraid of anything or anyone. i always say what i think and if i can't tell the truth it's because i can't prove it. there are no problems. a large and powerful criminal network, the �*ndrangheta first came to national prominence in the 1970s. but it's believed they could date back to the late 18th century. they don'tjust operate in europe, their activities have been unearthed as far afield as north and south america and even australia. it's estimated the group have an annual turnover of more than 50 billion euros. that's nearly $60 billion. bigger than most companies in italy. this isjust the beginning. in the coming months, hundreds of other suspects will go on trial, but these proceedings are only targeting one of perhaps 150 families that makes up this sprawling criminal enterprise. there is a lot of work to be done. next — the heroic story of one man and his dog. a life—size bronze statue of a world war two lance corporal — jimmy muldoon — and his dog khan, who saved his life, has been unveiled. people in south lanarkshire in scotland — where the inseparable pair of wartime heroes lived — wanted to pay tribute to their bravery. aileen clarke has more. together forever in bronze, togetherforever in bronze, lance corporaljenny muldoon and his dog, mike won the german shepherd who served alongside him and save the soldier's life. in 1944 they were thrown into the sea and jenny was in trouble. ibis thrown into the sea and jenny was in trouble. �* . , thrown into the sea and jenny was in trouble. a , ., ,, trouble. as they approach the island that not trouble. as they approach the island that got bombarded _ trouble. as they approach the island that got bombarded and _ trouble. as they approach the island that got bombarded and sank- trouble. as they approach the island that got bombarded and sank and i trouble. as they approach the island that got bombarded and sank and it| that got bombarded and sank and it left everybody in the water. the dog managed to get to shore but there was no handler with it but you could hear the handler in the water, my father, so he ran down and jumped back in, got him by the scruff of the neck until tonight. about 200 yards from shore.— yards from shore. after the war, khan had to _ yards from shore. after the war, khan had to be _ yards from shore. after the war, khan had to be returned - yards from shore. after the war, khan had to be returned to - yards from shore. after the war, khan had to be returned to his i khan had to be returned to his owners. he was awarded the animal's victorian close and jimmy went to the ceremony. victorian close and jimmy went to the ceremony-— victorian close and jimmy went to the ceremony. there was not much affection between _ the ceremony. there was not much affection between them _ the ceremony. there was not much affection between them that - the ceremony. there was not much affection between them that they l affection between them that they decided to take him home. he has been rewarded _ decided to take him home. he has been rewarded as _ decided to take him home. he has been rewarded as a _ decided to take him home. he has been rewarded as a local- decided to take him home. he has been rewarded as a local hero. - been rewarded as a local hero. in the butcher shop they allocated ten at three some neat free of charge, so he was well looked after. ltrufhat at three some neat free of charge, so he was well looked after. what do ou think so he was well looked after. what do you think your— so he was well looked after. what do you think your father _ so he was well looked after. what do you think your father would - so he was well looked after. what do you think your father would make - you think your father would make of that? he you think your father would make of that? ., , ., ., ., that? he would be over the moon. it is auoin to that? he would be over the moon. it is going to be _ that? he would be over the moon. it is going to be a _ that? he would be over the moon. it is going to be a strange _ that? he would be over the moon. it is going to be a strange feeling - is going to be a strange feeling heading to the pub and having him there watching me from a statue. it is going to be very strange. for some of us it has been a beautiful start to the day with lots of sunshine and chili and for others it has been cloudy with some rain. what is happening as we have this first weather front moving across and then a second front greater than the day also bringing some rain it is a breezy day ahead especially in the north and west. you can see the rain making progress across northern ireland and western scotland and it will south west england as well. after a sunny start in central and eastern areas the cloud is going to build and the rain will continue to move away from northern ireland and continue to trust scotland. it is breezy and windy across the north and west. as the rain clears to northern ireland they will be a fair bit of cloud and by then the rain affecting north west england, wales and devon and cornwall. ahead of the cloud building on the far south—east will hold on to the sunshine for the longest. through this evening and overnight are first weather front moves away into the north sea. there will be a lot of cloud left behind it and the second weather front continues to push those words and eastwards weakening all the rain turning lighter and more patchy. by the end of the night we are looking at clear skies across the of northern ireland. compared to this morning when it was cold tomorrow is not going to be as cold. as we head through the day here is a weather front continuing to sink across northern england and through wales. it may clip the south—west of england times. ahead of its brightness and we are looking at some brightness on the other side but we have a weak weather front sinking south across scotland and into northern ireland and that is going to bring some showers, some of which will be heavy and thundery. it is moving further south and north in the coming days and it will pep up some of that mean for wales through the course of tuesday. temperatures turn on the north to 16 in the south. on wednesday we have that waiting front producing this cloud and rain. forthe waiting front producing this cloud and rain. for the north of the drier and rain. for the north of the drier and brighter with a few showers. it would be long before the next weather front comes our way and our top temperatures ten to 14 degrees. hello. this is bbc news. i'm victoria derbyshire. here are the latest headlines in the uk and around the world. an emergency debate in the uk parliament as the government comes under fire over allegations of sleaze and corruption. one conservative says mps should be allowed second jobs. i don't think a hard and fast ban is the right way forward but i think everything we do has to pass a smell test. the world food programme warns that millions in afghanistan will die if the international community doesn't help. we are looking at the worst humanitarian crisis on earth. 95% of the people don't have enough food, and now we are looking at 23 million people marching towards starvation. the united states reopens its borders to fully vaccinated uk visitors. and 70 members of an italian crime family are sentenced in the county's