hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with us, the broadcaster penny smith, and the home affairs editor of the evening standard, martin bentham. the metro's headline is "time to end the online hatred", in the wake of mp sir david amess's murder. the guardian says borisjohson is facing calls to crackdown on social media abuse and end online anonymity, following the 69—year—old's death. the is front page vows mps will insist on meeting the public in person and without the police. the southend echo celebrates the conservative mp's wish coming true that southend is granted city status. the telegraph says the covid booster programme is moving "too slow", with millions waiting to receive a third dose ahead of winter. in the times, an independent review recommends mi—5 should have greater control over counter terrorism startegy prevent. the photo is an image the paper claims might be the suspect, it caught on cctv. and the ft says the government will help almost 100,000 households to install electric heatpumps as part of its net zero startegy. let's start on the positive aspect of this awful story of the killing of this awful story of the killing of sir david amess, we've got the echo, which covers southend and rochford — a paper we don't feature very often at all, and here it is, "david's city of southend," the prime minister confirmed today that southend is being granted the status that sir david kinley fought for. the person who fought for this campaign, sir is not here to see this, but at least it is a positive thing — sir david, and a good legacy for him and those who share his desire for southend to become a city. it'll be a fairly small city but it will benefit from what we hear from but it will benefit from what we hearfrom people but it will benefit from what we hear from people living there, the status and profile it'll get. so i think it's a good thing and something that clearly is being very well received today, lots of support for it in parliament and lots of people wanting to do something, once you get something out of what's been an absolutely horrific incident in a few days. an absolutely horrific incident in a few da s. , ., an absolutely horrific incident in a few da s. ., ,, an absolutely horrific incident in a fewda s. ., ,, few days. those who saw sir david amess in action, _ few days. those who saw sir david amess in action, he _ few days. those who saw sir david amess in action, he never- few days. those who saw sir david amess in action, he never tired i few days. those who saw sir david amess in action, he never tired of| amess in action, he never tired of mentioning the name southend — shoehorned it in whenever he could, apparently. shoehorned it in whenever he could, a- arentl. , shoehorned it in whenever he could, anarentl. , ., ., apparently. exactly that, and actually the _ apparently. exactly that, and actually the tributes - apparently. exactly that, and actually the tributes have - apparently. exactly that, and| actually the tributes have just apparently. exactly that, and - actually the tributes have just been staggering in the fact that everyone has said _ staggering in the fact that everyone has said how incredibly kind and gentle~ — has said how incredibly kind and gentle. he was. he was the master of the private _ gentle. he was. he was the master of the private member's ten—minute rule bill. the private member's ten—minute rule hilt he _ the private member's ten—minute rule hilt he was _ the private member's ten—minute rule bill. he was the person who saw the wrongs— bill. he was the person who saw the wrongs in_ bill. he was the person who saw the wrongs in society and wanted actually — wrongs in society and wanted actually to get it sorted. southend will become the 52nd city. i didn't realise it— will become the 52nd city. i didn't realise it doesn't mean major changes, _ realise it doesn't mean major changes, and i always thought in the past that— changes, and i always thought in the past that to — changes, and i always thought in the past that to be a city, if you are small. you _ past that to be a city, if you are small, you had to have a cathedral like peterborough — it's a lot bigger— like peterborough — it's a lot bigger than when i was working there for the _ bigger than when i was working there for the evening telegraph — but it's a symbol— for the evening telegraph — but it's a symbol for local people. . it for the evening telegraph - but it's a symbol for local people. .- a symbolfor local people. . it was all organised _ a symbolfor local people. . it was all organised in _ a symbolfor local people. . it was all organised in a _ a symbolfor local people. . it was all organised in a bit _ a symbolfor local people. . it was all organised in a bit of— a symbolfor local people. . it was all organised in a bit of a - a symbolfor local people. . it was all organised in a bit of a rush, - all organised in a bit of a rush, people in southend taken by surprise when the prime minister announced it this afternoon. of course the eyes looking at a subject that's being talked about a lot since last friday when sir david was killed. "mps val to meet public face—to—face." some politicians saying that mps are just not sake democrats say, anyone can walk into their surgeries if they make an appointment, but many others are saying no, this is absolutely an integral part of what democracy is integral part of what democracy is in this country, that you get to meet your representative one to one. and of course included in that is the mp— and of course included in that is the mp stephen timms, who was stabbed _ the mp stephen timms, who was stabbed during an advice clinic years— stabbed during an advice clinic years ago, and he said, "we must not -ive years ago, and he said, "we must not give up _ years ago, and he said, "we must not give up on _ years ago, and he said, "we must not give up on accessibility." and the thing _ give up on accessibility." and the thing is, — give up on accessibility." and the thing is, yes, of course, whenever we have _ thing is, yes, of course, whenever we have a — thing is, yes, of course, whenever we have a terrorist incident, we all have _ we have a terrorist incident, we all have to _ we have a terrorist incident, we all have to step — we have a terrorist incident, we all have to step up to the place and stand _ have to step up to the place and stand up— have to step up to the place and stand up and say we will not be towed — stand up and say we will not be towed hy— stand up and say we will not be cowed by this, we will not change our way— cowed by this, we will not change our way of— cowed by this, we will not change our way of working. but on the other hand, _ our way of working. but on the other hand. in— our way of working. but on the other hand. in the — our way of working. but on the other hand, in the cold light of day, i do wonder— hand, in the cold light of day, i do wonder if— hand, in the cold light of day, i do wonder if families will say yes, it's all— wonder if families will say yes, it's all very well and good, but would — it's all very well and good, but would you _ it's all very well and good, but would you not feel a bit more comfortable if, for example, you had the arches— comfortable if, for example, you had the arches that you could go through in some _ the arches that you could go through in some places, metal detectors, to ensure _ in some places, metal detectors, to ensure someone cannotjust arrive carrying _ ensure someone cannotjust arrive carrying something like this, or any other— carrying something like this, or any other protection. and notjust mps as well, _ other protection. and notjust mps as well, because let's face it, when we look— as well, because let's face it, when we look at — as well, because let's face it, when we look at the amount of abuse that there _ we look at the amount of abuse that there is— we look at the amount of abuse that there is in— we look at the amount of abuse that there is in the moment, there is a lot of— there is in the moment, there is a lot of anger— there is in the moment, there is a lot of anger out there and a lot of people _ lot of anger out there and a lot of people being very frustrated, really horrible _ people being very frustrated, really horrible and hideous. ambulance crews— horrible and hideous. ambulance crews are — horrible and hideous. ambulance crews are being attacked, nhs staff being _ crews are being attacked, nhs staff being attacked, shop workers being attacked _ being attacked, shop workers being attacked. there is a wider issue here _ attacked. there is a wider issue here as — attacked. there is a wider issue here as well about how we deal with this unpleasantness. let here as well about how we deal with this unpleasantness._ this unpleasantness. let me tell you what i've this unpleasantness. let me tell you what i've just _ this unpleasantness. let me tell you what i've just been _ this unpleasantness. let me tell you what i've just been passed, - this unpleasantness. let me tell you what i've just been passed, a - this unpleasantness. let me tell you what i've just been passed, a piece i what i'vejust been passed, a piece of news from our bbc�*s cotton counterpart saying counsellors in glasgow have been advised not to hold face—to—face surgeries until more information is known about the death of sir david amess. the chief executive of the council has emailed members with updated advice last friday. they are asked to raise any security concerns and are being offered personal safety training. but then we are taken by surprise when these attacks happen, there's something rather beautiful about the fact that you turn up in a village hall or a church hall to meet your mp. it's very grassroots and homespun — by the lack of security is obvious. homespun - by the lack of security is obvious-— homespun - by the lack of security is obvious. . ., �* , ., , ., is obvious. and that's how it should remain, is obvious. and that's how it should remain. isn't— is obvious. and that's how it should remain, isn't it? _ is obvious. and that's how it should remain, isn't it? and _ is obvious. and that's how it should remain, isn't it? and that's - is obvious. and that's how it should remain, isn't it? and that's being . remain, isn't it? and that's being reflected in some of today's debates. but clearly if there is an identifiable risk, then the situation must be different, if there's been sustained abuse and threats directed at mps, then police will need to look at that and respond accordingly. clearly there'll be a greater awareness of there'll be a greater awareness of the risk. 0n the other hand, so it appears allegedly, this is slightly different to the things we've been hearing about today, very distasteful abuse and abuse being directed at mps for all sorts of reasons. i think the targeted members of parliament are a type that we seem to have in this terrible attack on sir david is a slightly terrible thing, and the risk with this is that there will be a copycat — not that there's any that's going on, but there seems to be an initiated incident, and other people get the idea to do the same sort of thing on a terrorist level. but from what we've been hearing about today, it's a very different type of problem, which is equally serious in a way, having said that, that people are just being abused and hounded relentlessly as an mp for all sorts of reasons. whether that necessitates having security all the time and cutting off access, i think probably not. in most cases, but clearly it would be better if it wasn't happening and some of the vitriol has been directed on social media needs to be addressed. . i media needs to be addressed. . i mean, can you legislate for it. ? mean, can you legislate for it. 7 who is it down to?— who is it down to? while the government is _ who is it down to? while the government is trying - who is it down to? while the government is trying to - who is it down to? while the - government is trying to legislate, it will be giving the duty of care to prevent certain types of material appearing on their sites, obviously there'll a boundary as to where hate speech and freedom of speech intersect, there's always a discussion about where that boundary should be, and a lot of mps think it's too generous at the moment and should be tougher and tightened. 0ff, should be tougher and tightened. off, will be given responsibility for issuing fines, so there will be an attempt to address the problem, whether it achieves it or not is a different question. of course social media company themselves have great capacity to analyse material on their sites and take stuff down, which they do take down in the case of child abuse, images and so on, some of those things get taken down, some of those things get taken down, so it's not as if they do nothing, but the question is could they do more? ~ ., ., ., , , more? moving on to the times. this imaue on more? moving on to the times. this image on the _ more? moving on to the times. this image on the front _ more? moving on to the times. this image on the front page _ more? moving on to the times. this image on the front page is - image on the front page is claimed to be that of the suspect and what the bbc understands is that he was referred to prevent, moving people away from radicalisation a few years ago, but he was never a formal subject of interest to mi5. at the wider story here is that teachers and faith leaders are too soft on suspected radicals, according to what this review in to say. that's riaht, it's what this review in to say. that's right. it's an _ what this review in to say. that's right, it's an independent - what this review in to say. that's right, it's an independent reviewi what this review in to say. that's i right, it's an independent review of the scheme. the sentence thatjust kind of— the scheme. the sentence thatjust kind of left — the scheme. the sentence thatjust kind of left out at me, further down in the _ kind of left out at me, further down in the article, is there saying "a key problem is the sheer scale of referrals " — key problem is the sheer scale of referrals." they're having to wade through _ referrals." they're having to wade through all— referrals." they're having to wade through all these people and find out those who really are on the verge _ out those who really are on the verge of — out those who really are on the verge of being radicalised. but you've — verge of being radicalised. but you've got this, as you mentioned, there _ you've got this, as you mentioned, there are _ you've got this, as you mentioned, there are too soft on intervention. some _ there are too soft on intervention. some of— there are too soft on intervention. some of these panels where they look at the _ some of these panels where they look at the people who have been referred. _ at the people who have been referred, they are panels which could _ referred, they are panels which could include teachers and nhs workers. — could include teachers and nhs workers, psychiatrists and police and security services, and their saying — and security services, and their saying this _ and security services, and their saying this scheme for mentoring, extracurricular activities, and realised _ extracurricular activities, and realised it _ extracurricular activities, and realised it was voluntary but it definitely is. there saying the decision—making panels are too big, often _ decision—making panels are too big, often up _ decision—making panels are too big, often up to— decision—making panels are too big, often up to 20 people, and there's this problem with certain people being... — this problem with certain people being... they want to see the best in people. — being... they want to see the best in people. is— being... they want to see the best in people, is what they're saying, and the _ in people, is what they're saying, and the need to be a bit more hawkish— and the need to be a bit more hawkish and are suggesting that there _ hawkish and are suggesting that there should be more mi5 in counterterrorism rather what they are describing as weaker agencies because _ are describing as weaker agencies because they don't want to antagonise faith groups. what successes _ antagonise faith groups. what successes can _ antagonise faith groups. what successes can the _ antagonise faith groups. what successes can the prevent - antagonise faith groups. twist successes can the prevent programme point to? successes can the prevent programme oint to? ., .., successes can the prevent programme oint to? ., , successes can the prevent programme ointto? ., , �*, , point to? you can believe it's been very successful _ point to? you can believe it's been very successful in _ point to? you can believe it's been very successful in flagging - point to? you can believe it's been very successful in flagging a - point to? you can believe it's been| very successful in flagging a people who have been of interest in helping to divert them away from terrorism and bring them onto the radar, so to speak. so i think if you speak to the police, certainly they'll absolutely say that it's a very good thing, and without it — if you don't have a system, as some will argue, some faith groups have argued for and against it for that very reason because they don't like it stigmatising muslims, generally speaking, is how it's being articulated by some people. but if you don't have it then you have no referrals whatsoever. i think the problem with the thrust of the story, so to speak is that of people do get referred, but for example, as we believe is the case in this instance, somebody referred to a time ago — it doesn't mean they'll remain, even if they are deemed more of a problem at that time. if they aren't doing things in the meantime, then they won't remain on the radar. they can't monitor and don't monitor even free to terrorists in some cases a tentative fashion, others who they know are problematic but don't have the evidence to bring to court and so on, they can't deal with all those people all the time because there's unfortunately quite a lot of them. so the idea that if somebody is identified 7— eight years ago, but this is a great thing, there's missed opportunities as there is in other places, but we certainly don't know that and it's probably unlikely, as there's been no evidence of activities that something happened a long time ago, that that will turn out to why something wasn't detected. to prevent what's happened. what's the statute of limitations _ prevent what's happened. what's the statute of limitations on _ prevent what's happened. what's the statute of limitations on the - statute of limitations on the responsibility? let's move on to responsibility7 let's move on to boosters, just briefly on the times and we'll talk about the telegraph — "campaign will push bigger uptake for boosters. we have the collision of flu and coronavirus just around the corner. of flu and coronavirus 'ust around the _ of flu and coronavirus 'ust around the come.— the corner. they are saying the troblem the corner. they are saying the problem appears _ the corner. they are saying the problem appears to _ the corner. they are saying the problem appears to be - the corner. they are saying the problem appears to be not - the corner. they are saying the - problem appears to be not capacity, but a _ problem appears to be not capacity, but a lessened sense of urgency. i don't _ but a lessened sense of urgency. i don't know— but a lessened sense of urgency. i don't know about you, but i was on the tube _ don't know about you, but i was on the tube this morning, for example, and i_ the tube this morning, for example, and i was _ the tube this morning, for example, and i wasjust thinking back to the tube this morning, for example, and i was just thinking back to that time a _ and i was just thinking back to that time a year— and i was just thinking back to that time a yearand and i was just thinking back to that time a year and a half ago, and i remember— time a year and a half ago, and i rememberafterthe first time a year and a half ago, and i remember after the first lockdown — i remember— remember after the first lockdown — i remember being quite panicked about— i remember being quite panicked about going out, i had been living entirely— about going out, i had been living entirely on— about going out, i had been living entirely on tens of things i would never— entirely on tens of things i would never normally eat and bits of relish — never normally eat and bits of relish on _ never normally eat and bits of relish on top, the type that's left over from — relish on top, the type that's left over from good news with cash goodness — over from good news with cash goodness knows when. i went out to the shops _ goodness knows when. i went out to the shops and getting my heart racing. — the shops and getting my heart racing, washing my hands ferociously when _ racing, washing my hands ferociously when i _ racing, washing my hands ferociously when i got _ racing, washing my hands ferociously when i got back, i was wearing a mask. _ when i got back, i was wearing a mask. i— when i got back, i was wearing a mask. i got— when i got back, i was wearing a mask, i got dressed when people stepped — mask, i got dressed when people stepped too close to me, they're only 40% — stepped too close to me, they're only 40% of us on the tube who were actually— only 40% of us on the tube who were actually wearing masks. it was a bit squashed. — actually wearing masks. it was a bit squashed, no social distancing at all. maybe — squashed, no social distancing at all. maybe we have lost a sense of urgency. _ all. maybe we have lost a sense of urgency. i— all. maybe we have lost a sense of urgency, i think there is perhaps this feeling that if you are double 'ab this feeling that if you are double jab you _ this feeling that if you are double jab you can feel a bit more gung ho. and also— jab you can feel a bit more gung ho. and also don't forget we've been told by— and also don't forget we've been told by our prime minister to get back to _ told by our prime minister to get back to the office, so we're going back— back to the office, so we're going back to _ back to the office, so we're going back to the — back to the office, so we're going back to the office, so we're going back to the office, we're going to places— back to the office, we're going to places where the theatres are open, its brilliant. — places where the theatres are open, it's brilliant, i've seen somebody wonderful— it's brilliant, i've seen somebody wonderful things. it's brilliant, i've seen somebody wonderfulthings. but it's brilliant, i've seen somebody wonderful things. but again, it's brilliant, i've seen somebody wonderfulthings. but again, we it's brilliant, i've seen somebody wonderful things. but again, we are all mixing _ wonderful things. but again, we are all mixing again, maybe this is something that we should have expected. it still feels unreal to me to _ expected. it still feels unreal to me to be — expected. it still feels unreal to me to be in a room with lots of people. — me to be in a room with lots of people. briefly if we would look at the daily— people. briefly if we would look at the daily telegraph," booster programme is too slow," raising fears— programme is too slow," raising fears that — programme is too slow," raising fears that many who have not been able to _ fears that many who have not been able to receive this third dose. we have the able to receive this third dose. - have the opportunity to have it, if we won't use it, maybe the rest of the world will take the doses? ierhfhiiie the world will take the doses? while we have got — the world will take the doses? while we have got the _ the world will take the doses? trash is: we have got the opportunity the world will take the doses? m is: we have got the opportunity to the world will take the doses? "i is: we have got the opportunity to use it, i was looking today to see if i could be booked, i'm looking at the middle december, but i can't book it because one of the age groups that qualify for is only limited at the moment to i think from my work, and so on. so you can't, then the risk will be that when you get to the point that you can book it, it's all booked up and you can't get in there. so there does seem to be a slight disconnect there that their people who probably can have and would like to have it, i certainly would like to have it, i certainly would as soon as i could, they can't at least get in the diary so that when we are available, we can actually have it. so i do think the question there is that. i’ll actually have it. so i do think the question there is that.— question there is that. i'll be knockint question there is that. i'll be knocking the _ question there is that. i'll be knocking the door _ question there is that. i'll be knocking the door down - question there is that. i'll be knocking the door down if i question there is that. i'll be l knocking the door down if they offered me at. along with my flu jab, i shall be like a pincushion. let's finish with heating. just briefly, "boiler vouchers will help 90,000 homes switch from gas." these are expensive things to replace. brute are expensive things to replace. we want to are expensive things to replace. - want to be positive, we need to find it weighted get people to do it, so kick—starting some people into doing it —— a way to get people to do it. what we do need is a much clearer message as to what it is that can be done. because personally, i'd like to do it, it seems baffling at the moment as to what exactly you can do, and it's a headache to think about the right choice and when should you make that choice, and so on. i'm sure there are plenty of people in the same boat who aren't quite sure what the best way to do that will be. the quite sure what the best way to do that will be— that will be. the financial times shows this _ that will be. the financial times shows this home _ that will be. the financial times shows this home comforts, - that will be. the financial times| shows this home comforts, what that will be. the financial times - shows this home comforts, what the heat pumps look like — they are pretty big, i don't know where you'd put them, and some propertiesjust can't accommodate them. you want to buy a new electric car but they cost a lot of money to buy the new. exactly, i was looking at, but —— looking — exactly, i was looking at, but —— looking at — exactly, i was looking at, but —— looking at heat pumps, we know the disadvantages, i know we quite like to be _ disadvantages, i know we quite like to be optimistic but nevertheless, hi-h to be optimistic but nevertheless, high upfront costs, difficult to install. — high upfront costs, difficult to install, questionable sustainability, issues and cold weather. _ sustainability, issues and cold weather, not entirely carbon neutral. _ weather, not entirely carbon neutral, planning permission might be required. . will neutral, planning permission might be required- -_ be required. . will be trying to be tositive, be required. . will be trying to be positive. maybe _ be required. . will be trying to be positive, maybe put _ be required. . will be trying to be positive, maybe put a _ be required. . will be trying to be positive, maybe put a pin on - be required. . will be trying to be positive, maybe put a pin on that| positive, maybe put a pin on that for the next time.— for the next time. turned that keatint for the next time. turned that keating off. — for the next time. turned that keating off, that's _ for the next time. turned that keating off, that's the - for the next time. turned that keating off, that's the only . for the next time. turned that l keating off, that's the only way. for the next time. turned that - keating off, that's the only way. de unit? i've half— keating off, that's the only way. de unit? i've half needed _ keating off, that's the only way. de unit? i've half needed a _ keating off, that's the only way. de unit? i've half needed ajumper, i unit? i've half needed a “umper, it's been four * unit? i've half needed a “umper, it's been four years _ unit? i've half needed ajumper, it's been four years since. - unit? i've half needed ajumper, it's been four years since. i'll- unit? i've half needed ajumper, | it's been four years since. i'll put an order in. _ it's been four years since. i'll put an order in, it— it's been four years since. i'll put an order in, it took— it's been four years since. i'll put an order in, it took me _ it's been four years since. i'll put an order in, it took me six - it's been four years since. i'll put. an order in, it took me six months to do on and my aunt framed it in the end, it was like a work of art. lovely to see you both, that's it for the papers tonight. the papers will be back again tomorrow evening. geeta guru—murthy will be joined by broadcaster, lucy beresford and deputy political editor of the express, sam lister. dojoin us then if you can — but for now, goodnight. coming up next is the sport. goodnight. good evening. this is the latest from the bbc sportscenter. we start with the football at the emirates. and heartbreak for patrick vieira on his return to arsenal as a manager. his crystal palace side conceded a late, late equaliser. arsenal took an early lead through captain pierre emerick aubameyang. christian benteke took advantage of a sloppy arsenal mistake to equalise. the eagles then went ahead soon after, hitting arsenal on the counter, and 0dsonne eduoard's powerful drive put palace 2—1 up. and it looked as though vieira was heading for a famous win, but alexandre lacazette converted five minutes into stoppage time. crushing for the former arsenal idol, 2—2 at the emirates. i am a little bit frustrated as well, because i think we played at times some really good football, but we did not turn those games into a win. we want to win games. the performance is good, but we have to turn those performances into a win. the most positive thing is we kept going, the energy of the team never dropped, and they kept believing at the end. at the end, that is how he managed to get a point. that is the positive thing. there are many others we need to improve on. england have been given a two—match stadium ban by uefa, one of them suspended for two years, and a £85,000 fine, after the chaotic and violent scenes at wembley ahead of the euro 2020 final. they were the scenes that shamed english football — ticketless fans storming wembley this summer, on what was meant to have been one of the proudest days in the history of the stadium. the crowd disorder overshadowed england's first ever euros final. and today, the fa was hit with an unprecedented stadium ban, ordered to play england's next match in uefa competition behind closed doors, costing it millions in lost ticket revenue, along with a fine of £85,000 for a lack of order and discipline. the fa said... with an estimated quarter of a million people having descended on wembley for the match, both the fa and police have blamed each other for the mayhem that ensued. hugely embarrassing. it could have resulted in fatality, it could have resulted in serious injury. there may well have been a situation where emergency services could not have been got into wembley if they needed to, which is why i really urge and hope that both the police and the fa will change this culture of defensiveness and denial, and actually have a transparent and honest conversation about how to fix things for the future. the transformation of wembley and the development surrounding it has made policing matches more of a challenge. then there's stewarding, with many fans able to get inside the euros final via a disabled entrance. graham and his son, tim, who uses a wheelchair, were caught up in the chaos. there's a few dozen england fans who have somehow managed to pour in through the outer door, and there's five stewards trying to hold them back. it was like a scene out of game of thrones or lord of the rings, where you could feel that they were about to come crashing through. yeah, they were going to burst through. and it was like them trying to hold them back, and it was really quite scary. today's punishment, the most serious ever imposed on the fa by uefa, means that there will be no fans here next summer, when england play their opening nations league match at home. and there are fears it could have jeopardised a joint uk and ireland bid to stage the world cup in 2030. just last week, another england match was overshadowed here by clashes between the police and hungary fans, fifa now investigating, security arrangements both in and outside the stadium coming under ever—increasing scrutiny. dan roan, bbc news, wembley. to cricket now, and ireland got off to a winning start at the t20 world cup with a seven—wicket victory over the netherlands. it was all about the performance of seam bowler curtis campher, who took a remarkable four wickets in four balls, reducing the netherlands from 51—2 to 51—6 in the tenth over. ireland went on to dismiss the dutch for 106 and cruised to their target with 29 balls to spare, and it was campher who hit the winning runs. but sri lanka have gone top of ireland's group due to their superior run rate, impressing as they bowled namibia out for 96. not a great total for namibia to defend, but their bowlers started well, taking some early wickets. sri lanka were 26—3 at one point. but after that, avishka fernando and bhanuka rajapaksa took control, reaching their target with seven wickets still in hand and 59 balls to spare. there's some concern for england all—rounder liam livingstone after he suffered a finger injury in england's opening warm—up game before the world cup. livingstone had to leave the field after dropping a catch on the boundary as india pursued 189 to win in dubai. that was something they managed to do with six balls to spare, rishabh pant finishing with a six as india won by seven wickets. afterwards, england's moeen ali played down what happened to livingstone. and eddiejones has named sale scrum—half raffi quirke and northampton full—back tommy freeman in the england squad for the first time, ahead of next month's autumn internationals against tonga, australia and south africa. but once again, the england head coach has left out a host of big names, including the vunipola brothers — billy and mako — george ford and jamie george. 0wen farrell will once again captain the side. and that's all the sport from us for now. hello, good evening. quite a few parts of the country had temperatures of 18 celsius today and it's likely to get warmer tomorrow if and when the sunshine does come out. the warmer air is coming our way thanks to the winds from the south or southwest. as we've seen already, it has brought with it a lot of cloud, the cloud still around at the moment. this cloud here coming in from the atlantic is going to bring the next area of rain. the earlier rain and drizzle is moving away, and for a while, there could be a few breaks in the cloud. that will lead to the odd mist and fog patch, and then the thicker cloud arrives mainly across the western side of the uk to bring the rain to these areas. of course, after the warmth that we had during the day, the temperatures are going to fall very low overnight, 12—14 celsius. we start with a lot of cloud, outbreaks of rain around that could be heavy for a while over some of these western hills. as we head into the afternoon, the rain is in the north and west. it could cheer up again later across parts of northern ireland, but ahead of the rain in the afternoon, we should get some sunshine in east anglia and the southeast. and it's here temperatures could reach 20—21 celsius with a more typical of early summer. even when we have a cloud or outbreaks of rain, around 17—19 celsius. a very mild day. there's more rain in the forecast for wednesday, this time generally moving northwards across england and wales. some thundery downpours possible. either side of that, there's going to be some sunshine. still a mild day on wednesday, just not quite as mild as tuesday. we've got this rain arriving in the northwest of scotland. that's going to be significant because, to the north of that, there is colder air. that will push across the country through the rest of the week and the weather will feel very different. we still have a tangle of weather fronts on the scene during wednesday as we head into thursday. these are the main ones drifting down across the uk, bringing with it some showery outbreaks of rain. then those northerly winds come setting in and it's those northerly winds that will drop the temperatures as well. we've still got some outbreaks of rain to clear away from eastern parts of england on thursday. otherwise there will be some sunshine and a rash of showers, showers in the far north over the higher ground, maybe a wintry flavour as well. it's going to be a windy day. the winds generally from the north, possibly touching gale force, around some north sea coasts. that, of course, will make it feel colder, very different from what we're feeling at that moment. eight celsius the best in northern scotland, 13 in southern england and wales. welcome to newsday, reporting live from singapore, i'm karishma vaswani. the headlines... the world remembers soldier and statesman colin powell, who has died at the age of 8a. powell was the first african american to serve as us secretary of state. tributes have been pouring in. he gave the state department the very best of his leadership, his experience, his patriotism. the state department loved him for it. let us keep silence. a minute's silence as members of the british parliament remember one of their own, paying tribute to sir david amess, who was killed in a knife attack on friday. flash floods and landslides in southern india claim dozens of lives with the army now leading rescue efforts.