researchers warn the world's richest people to radically change their lifestyle to tackle climate change. good afternoon and welcome to bbc news. if you're over 45 and in england you can now book your covid jab, as the vaccination programme enters its next phase. everyone over fifty or in a high risk group has now been offered a first dose, according to the government, and ministers say they're on track to offer all adults a vaccine by the end ofjuly. it comes as officals race to contain �*significant�* new cases of the south african variant in south london, where hundreds of thousands of residents have been asked to come forward for tests. the prime minister has warned infections will rise as the economy reopens, and urged people to continue to be cautious. jim reed reports. another major milestone for the vaccination programme. all over 50s and those in high—risk groups in the uk have now been offered that first dose. at this vaccination centre in reading, they will now be inviting the next age group down. it's great that we've managed to achieve the target of getting everybody in the one to nine groups vaccinated by the deadline, a little bit ahead, actually. and we are now going to the 45—49 group, they are being asked to come forward. all those aged 45 and up can now use the nhs website to book appointments. the site appeared to crash this morning as thousands more tried to get a slot, though it is now back up and running. overall, more than 32 million people have had at least one jab of the astrazeneca and pfizer vaccines. going forward, though, the nhs will have to give a shot to all those coming back for a second booster dose, while at the same time trying to keep first doses going for those younger age groups. are you feeling well today? yeah, i'm feeling fine. today the first jabs using a third vaccine, made by the american firm moderna, are being given in england following a roll—out in wales and scotland. the supply forecast gives us confidence that assuming those supplies carry on as expected, then yes, we will not only deliver on the april 15 milestone of everybody aged 50 and above having had the chance for a vaccine, but all adults by the end ofjuly. all this comes at an important time in this pandemic. pub gardens and shops in england are now open for the first time this year. the successful vaccine roll—out has helped drive down infections and deaths. but scientists say the public still needs to follow the rules to avoid another wave of infections. the vaccines are only one part of the solution to the problem. people do need to continue to be careful and to avoid infecting each other. you can have this infection without realising it and so there is a risk. there are now all these tests available that people can obtain to test themselves and people should use those and i and certainly, for one, am going to continue to take a lot of care. and today another reminder of how easily this virus can spread. every resident of two london boroughs, wandsworth and lambeth, is being asked to take a pcr covid test. that is after a large cluster of infections caused by a variant of the virus first found in south africa. we have an outbreak _ that we are aware of in a local care home but we also know there has been some spread to the wider community. and we've been testing and tracing contacts from that outbreak. - but what we want to do now is check there is no further spread _ across our boroughs, _ both in lambeth and wandsworth. lambeth council says it is fairly confident it has the outbreak under control, but all those living in the boroughs, plus anyone who travels through, have been told they should get tested to reduce the chance of it spreading. jim reed reporting there. america's health authorities have recommended pausing the use of the johnson and johnson covid vaccine after six cases of severe blood clots in people who've had it. nearly seven million people in the united states have been given the vaccine. the uk has ordered 30 million doses, though it hasn't been approved by regulators yet. our health correspondent laura foster is here now. how significant is this? so the key phrase that is being bandied about is under an abundance of caution, and that basically means that the health agencies have said that the health agencies have said that the health agencies have said that the risk of this very rare blood clot is very low, but let's do the steps we can to ensure that there is no chance the risk happening of this variant of this thing which is very low risk. so sex women have experienced this rare but severe blood clot, —— six women have experienced this, one has died on the others are in hospital. find experienced this, one has died on the others are in hospital. and that added 7 million _ the others are in hospital. and that added 7 million people _ the others are in hospital. and that added 7 million people in _ the others are in hospital. and that added 7 million people in the - the others are in hospital. and that| added 7 million people in the states who have had this vaccine? yes. added 7 million people in the states who have had this vaccine? yes, 6.8 million peeple. _ who have had this vaccine? yes, 6.8 million people, six— who have had this vaccine? yes, 6.8 million people, six people _ who have had this vaccine? yes, 6.8 million people, six people out - who have had this vaccine? yes, 6.8 million people, six people out of - million people, six people out of 6.8 million, that's a very small percentage. and what they're looking at now is what has caused these clots and the idea is to cover everything and work out what has happened. everything and work out what has ha ened. ~ �* everything and work out what has hauened. ~ �* ., , , happened. we've got this 'ust in, from the dutch * happened. we've got this 'ust in, from the dutch medicines- happened. we've got thisjust in, i from the dutch medicines regulator, at this moment they are also looking at this moment they are also looking at thejohnson &johnson vaccine but they say the benefits of it outweigh they say the benefits of it outweigh the possible risks. we have some more information about the south african variant emerging in the south of london, and where it might have come from.— south of london, and where it might have come from. yes, is a document seen by the — have come from. yes, is a document seen by the bbc _ have come from. yes, is a document seen by the bbc indicates _ have come from. yes, is a document seen by the bbc indicates that - have come from. yes, is a document seen by the bbc indicates that this i seen by the bbc indicates that this rise of the south african variant in south london has been triggered by an individual who travelled from africa in february. and the link hasn't been proven yet but that's what the contact tracers are working on the assumptions of, the idea is that this person came from this country, it was not on the red list, which is where you have to hotel quarantine, but it is now on the list. the idea is that this person came back, they spread the variant to other members of their household, the people they live with, and then it went on to a care home in lambeth and 23 cases of the variant were detected in that care home, 13 staff and ten residents. fik. detected in that care home, 13 staff and ten residents.— detected in that care home, 13 staff and ten residents. 0k. and that any of those residents _ and ten residents. 0k. and that any of those residents had _ and ten residents. 0k. and that any of those residents had the - and ten residents. 0k. and that any of those residents had the vaccine, | of those residents had the vaccine, do we know? six. of those residents had the vaccine, do we know?— of those residents had the vaccine, do we know? ,, ., ., do we know? six of the ten that were infected had — do we know? six of the ten that were infected had received _ do we know? six of the ten that were infected had received one _ do we know? six of the ten that were infected had received one dose - do we know? six of the ten that were infected had received one dose of- infected had received one dose of the astrazeneca vaccine, but that was two or more weeks before their positive test dates. one of the 13 affected staff had had a single pfizer dose two or more weeks before that positive test date. so not everyone had had a vaccine and had the time needed for the immunity to really build. bud the time needed for the immunity to reall build. �* . , the time needed for the immunity to reall build. �* ., , ., , really build. and as well as the care home _ really build. and as well as the care home being _ really build. and as well as the care home being mentioned, l really build. and as well as the - care home being mentioned, coupled primary schools, as well? yes. primary schools, as well? yes, detected at _ primary schools, as well? yes, detected at two _ primary schools, as well? yes, detected at two primary - primary schools, as well? ye: detected at two primary schools in wandsworth, 54% of pupils, teachers and families who could have taken up extra search testing have now done so that's promising news. they really detected cases in southwark now, through analysing the waste water, so that's identified the presence of the south african variant through the very specific genetic typing. but it has not been linked to the cases in lambeth and wandsworth as of yet.— scotland's first minister, nicola sturgeon, has brought forward the easing of some covid restrictions, ten days earlier than expected. our correspondent, lorna gordon, is in glasgow. some become significant changes coming earlier than expected and it's all to do with that stay local restriction here in scotland that was meant to stay in place until april 26, so a little under two week's time, it would have been a week's time, it would have been a week on monday it was lifted, but nicola sturgeon today announcing that because the data, the number of cases were moving in the right direction, the case numbers are falling and falling quite fast and dramatically, in part because of that vaccination programme, she says they're bringing forward, accelerating the route map out as lockdown and the stay local restriction will be lifted on friday. at that point family and friends can travel across scotland for recreation, to see each other, as long as they stay outside. one other key change that comes in on friday, the four people from two different households allowed to meet up different households allowed to meet up outdoors was changed to —— will change to six people from six households being allowed to meet outdoors, that of course does not include children under 12, they are include children under 12, they are in addition to any groups, limited group numbers that are meeting. at the stay local restriction is being lifted on friday, a lot of people will be very pleased to hear that they can meet family and friends who live outside of their council area again. live outside of their council area aaain. ., ., .., �*, live outside of their council area aaain. ., ., �*, ., again. from a politician's point of view, this again. from a politician's point of view. this is _ again. from a politician's point of view, this is good _ again. from a politician's point of view, this is good news, - again. from a politician's point of view, this is good news, they're i view, this is good news, they're bringing these restrictions, the easing forward, but they also are still pushing the message we still have to social distance, bsi, all that sort of stuff, so they're sort of treading a fine line? —— social distance and stay outside. it’s distance and stay outside. it's interesting. — distance and stay outside. it�*s interesting, this is coming in the middle of an election campaign, the first minister insisting this has nothing to do with the election campaign, she is saying this is purely data driven, and in fact that they are legally obliged to reduce restrictions as soon as they are able to. but you're right, it's a very cautious path they have to tread. last week we saw hairdressers reopen in scotland, some garden centres, allowed to reopen here in scotland. schools this week, secondary schools allowed to reopen that the reality is most kids will be back at school next week after easter holidays. but the changes are incremental and they have to watch it carefully and make sure there was, the number of positive cases does not increase as the restrictions ease. so this will happen on friday and they will obviously watch the figure is very closely because the next big changes are expected in april 26, at that point, gyms will reopen and shops will reopen, light or hospitality with reopen, in the hospitality will be allowed to open on a restricted basis. —— all outdoor hospitality will reopen. the pub trade are critical, they say there is no point unless they can serve alcohol indoors there is no point in opening up indoors there is no point in opening up indoor spaces, but a very slow process. cross—border travel will be allowed on april 26. but they will watch figures very closely. and it's also worth noting that international travel is still not back, not on the cards yet, and that's, nicola sturgeon says, because they're worried about variance abroad. they're going to try and agreed on a four nation basis but she says the price of opening up at home might be to continue those restrictions about travelling abroad for a little longer. this thank you. this weekend marks two years since the journalist lyra mckee was shot dead as she observed a riot in londonderry. a hearing has begun this week to find out if there's enough evidence to send two local men for trial on charges linked to her death. meanwhile, as that continues, politicians and community leaders are again right now trying to resolve tension in other parts of northern ireland. 90 officers were hurt last week in what police called the worst violence they'd seen for years. it was sparked by a number of things, including frustration over the trading rules that came in after brexit. today, church leaders called the rioting �*heartbreaking' and called on the british, irish and eu governments to "treat northern ireland's fragile peace with care. let's talk exclusively now to the partner of lyra mckee, sara canning. good afternoon, thank you for talking to us. ida good afternoon, thank you for talking to us.— good afternoon, thank you for talking to us._ i i good afternoon, thank you for i talking to us._ i want good afternoon, thank you for - talking to us._ i want to talking to us. no problem. i want to ask ou, talking to us. no problem. i want to ask you. first. _ talking to us. no problem. i want to ask you, first, what's _ talking to us. no problem. i want to ask you, first, what's your - talking to us. no problem. i want to ask you, first, what's your reaction l ask you, first, what's your reaction to the violence in the last week or so? �* , , , , ., , so? it's been pretty worrying, actuall . so? it's been pretty worrying, actually- it — so? it's been pretty worrying, actually. it started _ so? it's been pretty worrying, actually. it started quite - so? it's been pretty worrying, l actually. it started quite small, so? it's been pretty worrying, i actually. it started quite small, a lot of what was happening here in derry, actually, the lot of it is linked to the northern ireland particle and sea border, which a lot of unionists see as almost a rotor of unionists see as almost a rotor of their connection to britain. —— ireland protocol. and i think part of that is because it's being sold to them by people who have this interest in riling it up. what to them by people who have this interest in riling it up.— interest in riling it up. what you b that? interest in riling it up. what you by that? i— interest in riling it up. what you by that? l think _ interest in riling it up. what you by that? i think politicians - interest in riling it up. what you by that? i think politicians here | by that? i think politicians here tend to use _ by that? i think politicians here tend to use a _ by that? i think politicians here tend to use a scaremongering i by that? i think politicians here | tend to use a scaremongering as by that? i think politicians here i tend to use a scaremongering as a fantastic voting too. so if people are afraid of the other side, we have nationalists, republican, unionist or loyalist community is command of the fear of the other side is great enough, then politicians are pretty much guaranteed to be voted back in and it will keep it rolling along as it always has nothing really changes here. ,., . ., , always has nothing really changes here. . ., , ., ., always has nothing really changes here. ., ., , , here. the politicians from all sides have condemned _ here. the politicians from all sides have condemned the _ here. the politicians from all sides have condemned the violence - here. the politicians from all sides have condemned the violence and | here. the politicians from all sides - have condemned the violence and said we need to come things down. the? we need to come things down. they have, we need to come things down. they have. they — we need to come things down. they have. they have _ we need to come things down. they have, they have all— we need to come things down. tie: have, they have all condemned it, but i mean, a lot of the time it's the rhetoric they come out with that is getting people's backs up and creating a culture of fear. share creating a culture of fear. are there any _ creating a culture of fear. are there any similarities between the rioting in londonderry two years ago, when lyra lost her life, the rioting in the last 12 days? the riotin: in rioting in the last 12 days? ii�*ué rioting in which lyra was killed was due to police coming into an estate to rate houses for... i'm not sure, actually, what the reason was but they had evidence, obviously, or intelligence that suggested they would find may be firearms or explosives. and i think that was the major export for that. —— the major spark. these rights arejust major export for that. —— the major spark. these rights are just a simmering of tensions i think. —— these riots. there is a culture of people who feel they are not being listened to and that they are being almost replaced. there is a lot of talk around an irish unity post here, and that can be frightening for people from a unionist background, because a lot of the rhetoric is that it might be successful, that they are not going to be the majority. 50 successful, that they are not going to be the majority.— to be the ma'ority. so do you see, sara, to be the ma'ority. so do you see, sara, why — to be the majority. so do you see, sara. why some — to be the majority. so do you see, sara, why some loyalists - to be the majority. so do you see, sara, why some loyalists might. to be the majority. so do you see, l sara, why some loyalists might feel frustrated? ., , ., frustrated? no, definitely. i am from a nationalist _ frustrated? no, definitely. i am from a nationalist background l frustrated? no, definitely. i am - from a nationalist background but... i mean, i can understand it because i mean, i can understand it because i keep an eye on the political situation and i read what is being put out there on twitter, what's being put out there on the local news, and a lot of itjust is, it's built to inflame the tensions and to create the few that their culture is going to be taken from them. and that they are going to be maybe subjugated in a way that in the past republicans and nationalists may have been, and that is a frightening thing. and we also are very impoverished is an area of the uk, there's very little benefits to things that have happened so far, we're just seeing things getting worse. even from the good friday agreement, you know, the dividends have not paid off yet and people are... ., , �* , are... other there hasn't been fiuuhtin are... other there hasn't been fighting and — are... other there hasn't been fighting and conflict _ are... other there hasn't been fighting and conflict and - are... other there hasn't been l fighting and conflict and tension are... other there hasn't been - fighting and conflict and tension in the way that we had seen during the troubles. but i wonder, do you worry now about a return to sectarian violence, the kind of things that we thought it had been consigned to history? thought it had been consigned to histo ? ., .,, thought it had been consigned to histo ? ._ , history? occasionally, but i don't feel the appetite _ history? occasionally, but i don't feel the appetite is _ history? occasionally, but i don't feel the appetite is there - history? occasionally, but i don't feel the appetite is there for - history? occasionally, but i don't feel the appetite is there for it i history? occasionally, but i don't| feel the appetite is there for it on either side. feel the appetite is there for it on eitherside. i feel the appetite is there for it on either side. i think there are small minorities within, there's always a few bad apples, people who would push for it or might actually attempt it but i don't think a more realistically, there will be a return to large—scale violence. [30 return to large-scale violence. do ou return to large—scale violence. do you think borisjohnson bear some responsibility for the brexit part of the problem, which essentially puts a border town the irish sea, and that has led to some loyalists say that sort of shaking the foundation or threatening the foundation or threatening the foundation of northern ireland as part of the union? 100%. he was at the dup conference a couple of years ago and basically said there would not be sea border, that if people in northern ireland were being asked to fill in customs forms to contact him, he would throw them in the bin, and now we are in that position. you can't cive and now we are in that position. you can't give such _ and now we are in that position. you can't give such a _ and now we are in that position. gm. can't give such a confident answer to that question and then backtrack on it a couple of years down the road. i mean, it completely undermines any authority he has here, undermines any faith people have in him. i here, undermines any faith people have in him-— have in him. i have the quote of what he actually _ have in him. i have the quote of what he actually said. _ have in him. i have the quote of what he actually said. he - have in him. i have the quote of what he actually said. he said i have in him. i have the quote of| what he actually said. he said to businesses in northern ireland, before brexit, he said, i want to make it absolutely clear that under no circumstances, under no circumstances, whatever happens, will there be, will i allow the eu or anyone else to create any kind of division down the irish sea.- division down the irish sea. yeah. i mean, division down the irish sea. yeah. i mean. how — division down the irish sea. yeah. i mean. how can _ division down the irish sea. yeah. i mean, how can you _ division down the irish sea. yeah. i mean, how can you say _ division down the irish sea. yeah. i mean, how can you say that - division down the irish sea. yeah. i mean, how can you say that and i division down the irish sea. yeah. i i mean, how can you say that and then backtrack on it a couple of years later and expect people to have any faith in your word? you know, especially because it was caught on camera, it was massively publicised. we are expecting to hear from the northern ireland secretary at some point this afternoon in the house of commons. do you think the current situation requires a visit from brandon lewis or even from boris johnson? i brandon lewis or even from boris johnson? . ~ , johnson? i mean, ithink they robabl johnson? i mean, ithink they probably have _ johnson? i mean, ithink they probably have a _ johnson? i mean, ithink they probably have a duty - johnson? i mean, ithink they probably have a duty of- johnson? i mean, ithink they probably have a duty of care | johnson? i mean, i think they| probably have a duty of care to johnson? i mean, i think they - probably have a duty of care to show their faces, probably have a duty of care to show theirfaces, but i'm not sure probably have a duty of care to show their faces, but i'm not sure what good it will actually do. i mean, we've had boris come here before and make promises and then backtrack on them, so to do that again, realistically, people don't have state in and don't put any credence in his words. —— people don't have faith in his words. that in his words. -- people don't have faith in his words.— faith in his words. at 's funeral, ou told faith in his words. at 's funeral, you told then — faith in his words. at 's funeral, you told then british _ faith in his words. at 's funeral, you told then british prime - faith in his words. at 's funeral, - you told then british prime minister theresa may that she was being negligent in her duties to north down, how would you describe boris johnson? —— at �*s funeral. no different, maybe even worse. find johnson? -- at 's funeral. no different, maybe even worse. and as i said different, maybe even worse. and as i said before. — different, maybe even worse. and as i said before, it's— different, maybe even worse. and as i said before, it's not _ different, maybe even worse. and as i said before, it's notjust _ different, maybe even worse. and as i said before, it's notjust theresa i i said before, it's notjust theresa may, it's been successive governments. we have been handled badly. unfortunately we do kind of require kid gloves, it's that we haven't moved on from that yet but we haven't and we are in a unique position within britain, so i do think we have to be handled differently. and as yet the government does not seem to have learned is that.— learned is that. how will it be resolved. _ learned is that. how will it be resolved, then? _ learned is that. how will it be resolved, then? how- learned is that. how will it be resolved, then? how will- learned is that. how will it be resolved, then? how will this learned is that. how will it be - resolved, then? how will this latest tension be resolved? i resolved, then? how will this latest tension be resolved?— tension be resolved? i honestly don't know- _ tension be resolved? i honestly don't know. because _ tension be resolved? i honestly don't know. because it - tension be resolved? i honestly don't know. because itjust - tension be resolved? i honestly i don't know. because itjust seems tension be resolved? i honestly - don't know. because itjust seems as though we are ignoring the fact that these deals were brought forward, theresa may and suggested the backstop and it was agreed upon and everyone was going forward with it, and then it was decided, no, the backstop was not good enough and we didn't want that, so then the northern ireland protocol was the other suggestion and everyone agreed to that, and a couple of weeks in line, no, that was terrible. so i can't see what the resolution will be because i think the options have nearly been exhausted. there was possiblyjust, we need to learn to sell, you know, the protocol or whatever the options that are on the table are to the communities who feel that it's eroding their britishness and taking away from their culture. fir britishness and taking away from their culture.— britishness and taking away from their culture. or find some way of makin: their culture. or find some way of making the _ their culture. or find some way of making the protocol— their culture. or find some way of making the protocol work. - their culture. or find some way of. making the protocolwork. possibly. the new- -- — making the protocolwork. possibly. the new... sorry, _ making the protocolwork. possibly. the new... sorry, go _ making the protocolwork. possibly. the new... sorry, go on. _ making the protocolwork. possibly. the new... sorry, go on. no, - making the protocolwork. possibly. the new... sorry, go on. no, you're ok, no the new... sorry, go on. no, you're 0k, go ahead- — the new... sorry, go on. no, you're ok, go ahead. the _ the new... sorry, go on. no, you're ok, go ahead. the new— the new... sorry, go on. no, you're ok, go ahead. the new ira - the new... sorry, go on. no, you're ok, go ahead. the new ira said - the new... sorry, go on. no, you're. ok, go ahead. the new ira said they were responsible _ ok, go ahead. the new ira said they were responsible for _ ok, go ahead. the new ira said they were responsible for lyra's _ ok, go ahead. the new ira said they were responsible for lyra's killing - were responsible for lyra's killing and apologise, which you rejected. he said the organisation groomed young people who are disenfranchised to carry guns. —— you sad. have you seen that an agreement happening with the riots over the last 12 days or so? ., ., , ., with the riots over the last 12 days or so? ., ., y., with the riots over the last 12 days or so? ., ., i. ., or so? yeah, i mean, you look at the demographics. _ or so? yeah, i mean, you look at the demographics, the _ or so? yeah, i mean, you look at the demographics, the people _ or so? yeah, i mean, you look at the demographics, the people who - or so? yeah, i mean, you look at the demographics, the people who are i demographics, the people who are doing most of the writing are young, people who weren't even for the most part alive during the troubles, there are post—ceasefire babies, and its fend down that this is what your community does and this is how you defend your community. and how you defend your community. and how you defend your community. and how you defend your culture on your way of life stop its just a pity we cannot just respect each other�*s culture and way of life, we always seem to sort of want to push against each other. so, yes, the grooming is still definitely ongoing, people are still definitely ongoing, people are still being brainwashed, fed these stories of great victories from the ira or uvf or whatever. and when kids don't have a lot to look forward to, they don't have great prospect here because we are a society that is massively reliant on the public sector, we have very little work available, you know, it's difficult. they need something to kind of thing too and i think that's what this gives them, it gives them something to cling to and may be a way of increasing their cash within the community and make them feel like they're making a difference. we them feel like they're making a difference-— them feel like they're making a difference. ~ ., ., difference. we are about to cross the commons. — difference. we are about to cross the commons, the _ difference. we are about to cross the commons, the northern - difference. we are about to cross i the commons, the northern ireland secretary brandon lewis is about to make a statement, is expected to a statement on the recent arrest we have seen. i don't know what you're doing now but i would be really grateful if we could come back to you to get your reaction to what you said? , ., , .,, ., ., you to get your reaction to what you said?— thank said? yes, no problem at all. thank ou. all said? yes, no problem at all. thank you- all right. _ said? yes, no problem at all. thank you. all right, less _ said? yes, no problem at all. thank you. all right, less cross _ said? yes, no problem at all. thank you. all right, less cross to - said? yes, no problem at all. thank you. all right, less cross to the - you. all right, less cross to the commons now, here's brandon lewis. update the house on the recent disorder— update the house on the recent disorder northern ireland is not the main _ disorder northern ireland is not the main areas — disorder northern ireland is not the main areas of unrest have been specific— main areas of unrest have been specific parts of belfast, newton abbot. _ specific parts of belfast, newton abbot, carrickfergus, ballymena, cookstown, and londonderry. the escalation— cookstown, and londonderry. the escalation in violence as an interface _ escalation in violence as an interface area commonly referred to a piece _ interface area commonly referred to a piece in _ interface area commonly referred to a piece in west belfast. —— a piece of wall~ _ a piece in west belfast. —— a piece of wall. police came under attack. as a _ of wall. police came under attack. as a result — of wall. police came under attack. as a result of the rest a total of 88 police — as a result of the rest a total of 88 police officers have been injured. _ 88 police officers have been injured, 18 arrests have been made injured, 18 arrests have been made in 15 individuals charge. my best wishes _ in 15 individuals charge. my best wishes are — in 15 individuals charge. my best wishes are with those police officers _ wishes are with those police officers. on the 9th of april the incidence — officers. on the 9th of april the incidence of public disorder were significantly reduced compared to previous— significantly reduced compared to previous evenings, there was however low disorder _ previous evenings, there was however low disorder in belfast. since, it has been — low disorder in belfast. since, it has been much, with only a few isolated — has been much, with only a few isolated incidents of disorder. —— it has— isolated incidents of disorder. —— it has been— isolated incidents of disorder. —— it has been much more common. the violent— it has been much more common. the violent disorder last week is totally— violent disorder last week is totally unacceptable. the attacks on police _ totally unacceptable. the attacks on police officers are utterly reprehensible. those engaged in this destruction and disorder do not represent — destruction and disorder do not represent the people of northern ireland — represent the people of northern ireland. it's tragic and deeply concerning that young people have been engaged in and encourage into this violence, and as a result, will now and _ this violence, and as a result, will now and up — this violence, and as a result, will now end up with criminal records. it can be _ now end up with criminal records. it can be easy— now end up with criminal records. it can be easy to look for a simplistic explanation for the recent disorder. however. _ explanation for the recent disorder. however, it's clear the factory behind — however, it's clear the factory behind it— however, it's clear the factory behind it are in fact complex and multifaceted. people are frustrated after year _ multifaceted. people are frustrated after year in which coronavirus has challenged — after year in which coronavirus has challenged all of us and i do recognise how frustrating it has been, _ recognise how frustrating it has been, especially foryoung recognise how frustrating it has been, especially for young people northern— been, especially for young people northern ireland facing uncertainty around _ northern ireland facing uncertainty around lifting lockdown restrictions without _ around lifting lockdown restrictions without having a clear road map in northern _ without having a clear road map in northern ireland. there's also a perception— northern ireland. there's also a perception that rules and restrictions have not been enforced equally— restrictions have not been enforced equally in _ restrictions have not been enforced equally in northern ireland, and we all know— equally in northern ireland, and we all know there are strongly held political — all know there are strongly held political views within and between communities that can be in tension with each— communities that can be in tension with each other. i recognise there are concerns about the implications of the _ are concerns about the implications of the northern ireland protocol, concerns— of the northern ireland protocol, concerns which overlap with wider questions — concerns which overlap with wider questions about national identity and political allegiance, and that comes— and political allegiance, and that comes at— and political allegiance, and that comes at a time of economic uncertainty caused by the pandemic. northern— uncertainty caused by the pandemic. northern ireland has made huge strides— northern ireland has made huge strides over the last cosmic decade, but its— strides over the last cosmic decade, but it's a _ strides over the last cosmic decade, but it's a post—conflict society and their— but it's a post—conflict society and their do— but it's a post—conflict society and their do elements of fragility because of that back for the last two decades. some sectors of the community feel they are not understood. the reconciliation, equality — understood. the reconciliation, equality and mutual understanding between _ equality and mutual understanding between communities and traditions envisaged _ between communities and traditions envisaged in the belfast good friday agreement is not recognised or experienced by all. there is still work— experienced by all. there is still work to— experienced by all. there is still work to do _ experienced by all. there is still work to do. the belfast good friday agreement, 23 years ago now, highlighted the importance of progress in areas of social development such as integrated education. these will be a vital part of— education. these will be a vital part of northern ireland's feature, enabling _ part of northern ireland's feature, enabling even more young people to .row enabling even more young people to grow up— enabling even more young people to grow up in_ enabling even more young people to grow up in the reality of a shared society, — grow up in the reality of a shared society, unable to effect positive change _ society, unable to effect positive change in — society, unable to effect positive change in their communities. —— and able to— change in their communities. —— and able to effect — change in their communities. —— and able to effect positive change. but all of _ able to effect positive change. but all of these issues and many others lyin- all of these issues and many others lying dialogue and engaging in the democratic process, not through violent— democratic process, not through violent disorder. it is incumbent in all of— violent disorder. it is incumbent in all of us _ violent disorder. it is incumbent in all of us to— violent disorder. it is incumbent in all of us to engage in political discourse _ all of us to engage in political discourse to support northern ireland — discourse to support northern ireland in— discourse to support northern ireland in leaving its divisive past behind, _ ireland in leaving its divisive past behind, by— ireland in leaving its divisive past behind, by continuing instead to look ahead at all of the opportunities of the future. mr deputy— opportunities of the future. mr deputy speaker, policing and justice matters _ deputy speaker, policing and justice matters are devolved under strand one issues— matters are devolved under strand one issues under the belfast good friday— one issues under the belfast good friday agreement. despite this being a devolved matter, though, the government has an important role to play supporting the executive to and offering _ play supporting the executive to and offering those that were like the police _ offering those that were like the police service of northern ireland supportm — police service of northern ireland support i— police service of northern ireland support... i continue to meet with northern— support... i continue to meet with northern ireland's party leaders and the police _ northern ireland's party leaders and the police there is northern ireland in recent— the police there is northern ireland in recent days to discuss the recent unrest _ in recent days to discuss the recent unrest 0ur— in recent days to discuss the recent unrest. our priority is to work together— unrest. our priority is to work together to ensure public safety. i very much — together to ensure public safety. i very much welcome the statement for the northern ireland executive itself— the northern ireland executive itself on — the northern ireland executive itself on the 12th of april that set out a _ itself on the 12th of april that set out a common position from all executive — out a common position from all executive parties against the violence _ executive parties against the violence and declare their support for law— violence and declare their support for law and order and policing, and i for law and order and policing, and iexoress_ for law and order and policing, and i express my gratitude to them for their efforts under the psni for their— their efforts under the psni for their continued work to keep people safe~ _ their continued work to keep people safe~ -- _ their continued work to keep people safe~ -- and — their continued work to keep people safe. —— and to the psni for the bio is a welcome — safe. —— and to the psni for the bio is a welcome many recent statements from across _ is a welcome many recent statements from across the community and beyond condemning _ from across the community and beyond condemning the violence and appealing for calm. the government respects— appealing for calm. the government respects the right to protest but it must _ respects the right to protest but it must be _ respects the right to protest but it must be done in a peaceful manner that respects the rule of law. the 10th of _ that respects the rule of law. the 10th of april marked 23 years since the belfast good friday agreement, an achievement which the people of northern— an achievement which the people of northern ireland are justifiably proud — northern ireland are justifiably proud of, in which we can continue and must — proud of, in which we can continue and must continue to work closely with the _ and must continue to work closely with the irish government as co—guarantors of that agreement. in that time _ co—guarantors of that agreement. in that time there has been a transformative change in northern ireland _ transformative change in northern ireland. peace has brought stability and opportunity. it's enabled northern ireland to develop into the vibrant, _ northern ireland to develop into the vibrant, exciting place it is today. mr speaker, this government is resolutely committed to peace and prosperity in northern ireland. we have invested significantly in a wide _ have invested significantly in a wide range of programmes and initiatives that aren't. that belfast _ initiatives that aren't. that belfast good friday agreement provided the foundation for peace and prosperity and we are committed to it. and prosperity and we are committed to it i_ and prosperity and we are committed to it ithink— and prosperity and we are committed to it. i think everybody in this house — to it. i think everybody in this house is _ to it. i think everybody in this house is. all of us across this house — house is. all of us across this house have a duty to support the people _ house have a duty to support the people of— house have a duty to support the people of northern ireland in shaping _ people of northern ireland in shaping a peaceful and prosperous society— shaping a peaceful and prosperous society for— shaping a peaceful and prosperous society for the future, a future that _ society for the future, a future that they — society for the future, a future that they can share. i've seen first-hand _ that they can share. i've seen first—hand an inclusive, prosperous and hopeful— first—hand an inclusive, prosperous and hopeful society that continues to build _ and hopeful society that continues to build on that hard—won peace. mr deputy— to build on that hard—won peace. mr deputy speaker, we all work together to resolve _ deputy speaker, we all work together to resolve the tensions that are currently — to resolve the tensions that are currently being faced. i know from my ongoing engagement with stakeholders including the irish government that this is a shared view, _ government that this is a shared view, the — government that this is a shared view, the only way to resolve differences is through dialogue and in that— differences is through dialogue and in that regard, we can all and must lead by— in that regard, we can all and must lead by example. i commend the statement to the house. | lead by example. i commend the statement to the house.- lead by example. i commend the statement to the house. i think the secretary of — statement to the house. i think the secretary of state _ statement to the house. i think the secretary of state for _ statement to the house. i think the secretary of state for his _ secretary of state for his statement. _ secretary of state for his statement. mr— secretary of state for his statement. mr deputy. secretary of state for his - statement. mr deputy speaker, 23 years— statement. mr deputy speaker, 23 years ago— statement. mr deputy speaker, 23 years ago this _ statement. mr deputy speaker, 23 years ago this week, _ statement. mr deputy speaker, 23 years ago this week, the _ statement. mr deputy speaker, 23 years ago this week, the belfast i years ago this week, the belfast good _ years ago this week, the belfast good friday— years ago this week, the belfast good friday agreement - years ago this week, the belfast good friday agreement was - years ago this week, the belfast - good friday agreement was signed. the violence — good friday agreement was signed. the violence in _ good friday agreement was signed. the violence in recent _ good friday agreement was signed. the violence in recent days - good friday agreement was signed. the violence in recent days some i good friday agreement was signed. the violence in recent days some of| the violence in recent days some of it carried _ the violence in recent days some of it carried out — the violence in recent days some of it carried out by— the violence in recent days some of it carried out by children _ the violence in recent days some of it carried out by children has- the violence in recent days some of it carried out by children has been. it carried out by children has been painful— it carried out by children has been painful to — it carried out by children has been painful to witness. _ it carried out by children has been painful to witness. our— it carried out by children has been painful to witness. our deep i painful to witness. our deep gratitude _ painful to witness. our deep gratitude belongs— painful to witness. our deep gratitude belongs to - painful to witness. our deep gratitude belongs to the i painful to witness. our deep i gratitude belongs to the police, community— gratitude belongs to the police, community workers— gratitude belongs to the police, community workers and - gratitude belongs to the police, community workers and leaders gratitude belongs to the police, i community workers and leaders on gratitude belongs to the police, - community workers and leaders on the ground _ community workers and leaders on the ground who _ community workers and leaders on the ground who have — community workers and leaders on the ground who have helped _ community workers and leaders on the ground who have helped restore - community workers and leaders on the ground who have helped restore some| ground who have helped restore some sense _ ground who have helped restore some sense of. _ ground who have helped restore some sense of. in _ ground who have helped restore some sense of. in recent _ ground who have helped restore some sense of, in recent days. _ ground who have helped restore some sense of, in recent days. the - sense of, in recent days. the violence _ sense of, in recent days. the violence was _ sense of, in recent days. the violence was unjustified i sense of, in recent days. the violence was unjustified and i violence was unjustified and unjustifiable, _ violence was unjustified and unjustifiable, those - violence was unjustified and unjustifiable, those adults i violence was unjustified and - unjustifiable, those adults cheering on youngsters _ unjustifiable, those adults cheering on youngsters showed _ unjustifiable, those adults cheering on youngsters showed a _ unjustifiable, those adults cheering on youngsters showed a sickening i on youngsters showed a sickening disregard — on youngsters showed a sickening disregard for _ on youngsters showed a sickening disregard for their— on youngsters showed a sickening disregard for their children's i disregard for their children's futures, _ disregard for their children's futures, but— disregard for their children's futures, but recent - disregard for their children's futures, but recent monthsi disregard for their children's i futures, but recent months have shown _ futures, but recent months have shown just — futures, but recent months have shown just how— futures, but recent months have shown just how fragile _ futures, but recent months have shown just how fragile the i futures, but recent months have shown just how fragile the and i futures, but recent months have i shown just how fragile the and that it requires— shown just how fragile the and that it requires responsible _ shown just how fragile the and that it requires responsible and - shown just how fragile the and that it requires responsible and carefuli it requires responsible and careful leadership— it requires responsible and careful leadership to _ it requires responsible and careful leadership to safeguard. - it requires responsible and careful leadership to safeguard. —— - it requires responsible and careful leadership to safeguard. —— how i leadership to safeguard. —— how fragile _ leadership to safeguard. —— how fragile the — leadership to safeguard. —— how fragile the piece _ leadership to safeguard. —— how fragile the piece is. _ leadership to safeguard. —— how fragile the piece is. there - leadership to safeguard. —— how fragile the piece is. there are i fragile the piece is. there are complex— fragile the piece is. there are complex and _ fragile the piece is. there are complex and varied _ fragile the piece is. there are complex and varied factors i fragile the piece is. there are i complex and varied factors behind the rioting, — complex and varied factors behind the rioting, disruptive _ the rioting, disruptive paramilitaries - the rioting, disruptive paramilitaries lashing| the rioting, disruptive i paramilitaries lashing out at police, _ paramilitaries lashing out at police, anger— paramilitaries lashing out at police, anger in— paramilitaries lashing out at police, anger in which i paramilitaries lashing out at police, anger in which the i paramilitaries lashing out at i police, anger in which the way the bobby— police, anger in which the way the bobby story— police, anger in which the way the bobby story funeral— police, anger in which the way the bobby story funeral was _ police, anger in which the way the bobby story funeral was handled i police, anger in which the way the i bobby story funeral was handled last year, bobby story funeral was handled last year. but _ bobby story funeral was handled last year. but also — bobby story funeral was handled last year. but also a _ bobby story funeral was handled last year, but also a deep _ bobby story funeral was handled last year, but also a deep sense - bobby story funeral was handled last year, but also a deep sense of- bobby story funeral was handled last year, but also a deep sense of hurt. year, but also a deep sense of hurt and anger— year, but also a deep sense of hurt and anger amongst— year, but also a deep sense of hurt and anger amongst unionist- year, but also a deep sense of hurt and anger amongst unionist and i and anger amongst unionist and loyalist— and anger amongst unionist and loyalist communities _ and anger amongst unionist and loyalist communities which i and anger amongst unionist and loyalist communities which hasl and anger amongst unionist and i loyalist communities which has been building _ loyalist communities which has been building for— loyalist communities which has been building for months _ loyalist communities which has been building for months and _ loyalist communities which has been building for months and must - loyalist communities which has been building for months and must not. loyalist communities which has been building for months and must not be| building for months and must not be ignored _ building for months and must not be ignored the — building for months and must not be ignored. the prime _ building for months and must not be ignored. the prime minister- building for months and must not be ignored. the prime minister may. ignored. the prime minister may promises — ignored. the prime minister may promises to— ignored. the prime minister may promises to the _ ignored. the prime minister may promises to the people - ignored. the prime minister may promises to the people of - ignored. the prime minister may. promises to the people of northern ireland _ promises to the people of northern ireland that — promises to the people of northern ireland that there _ promises to the people of northern ireland that there would _ promises to the people of northern ireland that there would be - promises to the people of northern ireland that there would be no i ireland that there would be no border— ireland that there would be no border with— ireland that there would be no border with great— ireland that there would be no border with great britain, i ireland that there would be no i border with great britain, knowing full well _ border with great britain, knowing full well his — border with great britain, knowing full well his brexit _ border with great britain, knowing full well his brexit deal— border with great britain, knowing full well his brexit deal would i full well his brexit deal would introduce _ full well his brexit deal would introduce barriers _ full well his brexit deal would introduce barriers across i full well his brexit deal would introduce barriers across the i full well his brexit deal would i introduce barriers across the irish sea _ introduce barriers across the irish sea he _ introduce barriers across the irish sea he made _ introduce barriers across the irish sea. he made those _ introduce barriers across the irish sea. he made those promises i introduce barriers across the irish i sea. he made those promises because he knew— sea. he made those promises because he knew economic— sea. he made those promises because he knew economic separation - sea. he made those promises because he knew economic separation would i sea. he made those promises becausej he knew economic separation would be unacceptable _ he knew economic separation would be unacceptable to — he knew economic separation would be unacceptable to the _ he knew economic separation would be unacceptable to the unionist _ unacceptable to the unionist community, _ unacceptable to the unionist community, and _ unacceptable to the unionist community, and the - unacceptable to the unionistj community, and the growing unacceptable to the unionist - community, and the growing political instability— community, and the growing political instability we — community, and the growing political instability we are _ community, and the growing political instability we are seeing _ community, and the growing political instability we are seeing has - community, and the growing political instability we are seeing has its i instability we are seeing has its roots _ instability we are seeing has its roots in— instability we are seeing has its roots in the _ instability we are seeing has its roots in the loss _ instability we are seeing has its roots in the loss of _ instability we are seeing has its roots in the loss of trust - instability we are seeing has its roots in the loss of trust that i instability we are seeing has its i roots in the loss of trust that this caused _ in moments of instability what sir john major— in moments of instability what sir john major and _ in moments of instability what sir john major and tony— in moments of instability what sir john major and tony blair, - in moments of instability what sir john major and tony blair, momo| john major and tony blair, momo ireland _ john major and tony blair, momo ireland and — john major and tony blair, momo ireland and the _ john major and tony blair, momo ireland and the right _ john major and tony blair, momo ireland and the right honourable i ireland and the right honourable member— ireland and the right honourable member for— ireland and the right honourable member for skipton _ ireland and the right honourable member for skipton and - ireland and the right honourable member for skipton and rebel. member for skipton and rebel understood. _ member for skipton and rebel understood, labour— member for skipton and rebel understood, labour and i member for skipton and rebel- understood, labour and conservative, is that _ understood, labour and conservative, is that trust. _ understood, labour and conservative, is that trust, leadership _ understood, labour and conservative, is that trust, leadership and _ is that trust, leadership and partnership— is that trust, leadership and partnership are _ is that trust, leadership and partnership are paramount. is that trust, leadership and i partnership are paramount to is that trust, leadership and - partnership are paramount to finding a way— partnership are paramount to finding a way forward — partnership are paramount to finding a way forward in _ partnership are paramount to finding a way forward in northern _ partnership are paramount to finding a way forward in northern ireland. i a way forward in northern ireland. as a co—guarantor_ a way forward in northern ireland. as a co—guarantor to _ a way forward in northern ireland. as a co—guarantor to the - a way forward in northern ireland. as a co—guarantor to the belfast i as a co—guarantor to the belfast good _ as a co—guarantor to the belfast good friday— as a co—guarantor to the belfast good friday agreement - as a co—guarantor to the belfast good friday agreement the i as a co—guarantor to the belfast i good friday agreement the prime minister_ good friday agreement the prime minister owes _ good friday agreement the prime minister owes it— good friday agreement the prime minister owes it to _ good friday agreement the prime minister owes it to the _ good friday agreement the prime minister owes it to the people - good friday agreement the prime minister owes it to the people of. minister owes it to the people of northern— minister owes it to the people of northern ireland _ minister owes it to the people of northern ireland to _ minister owes it to the people of northern ireland to restore - minister owes it to the people of northern ireland to restore the i northern ireland to restore the trust _ northern ireland to restore the trust he — northern ireland to restore the trust he has _ northern ireland to restore the trust he has squandered. - northern ireland to restore the trust he has squandered. he . northern ireland to restore the trust he has squandered. he isi northern ireland to restore the - trust he has squandered. he is not a casual_ trust he has squandered. he is not a casual observer _ trust he has squandered. he is not a casual observer to— trust he has squandered. he is not a casual observer to these _ trust he has squandered. he is not a casual observer to these events. - trust he has squandered. he is not a casual observer to these events. he| casual observer to these events. he must _ casual observer to these events. he must step— casual observer to these events. he must step up— casual observer to these events. he must step up and _ casual observer to these events. he must step up and urgently- casual observer to these events. he must step up and urgently convene i must step up and urgently convene talks with _ must step up and urgently convene talks with the — must step up and urgently convene talks with the political _ must step up and urgently convene talks with the political parties - must step up and urgently convene talks with the political parties in i talks with the political parties in northem— talks with the political parties in northern ireland _ talks with the political parties in northern ireland and _ talks with the political parties in northern ireland and all- talks with the political parties in northern ireland and all parties| talks with the political parties in l northern ireland and all parties to the protocol— northern ireland and all parties to the protocol to— northern ireland and all parties to the protocol to find _ northern ireland and all parties to the protocol to find solutions - northern ireland and all parties to the protocol to find solutions and i the protocol to find solutions and political — the protocol to find solutions and political agreement. _ the protocol to find solutions and politicalagreement. so- the protocol to find solutions and political agreement. so can - the protocol to find solutions and political agreement. so can the l political agreement. so can the secretary— political agreement. so can the secretary of _ political agreement. so can the secretary of state _ political agreement. so can the secretary of state outline - political agreement. so can the secretary of state outline when political agreement. so can the - secretary of state outline when the prime _ secretary of state outline when the prime minister— secretary of state outline when the prime minister is _ secretary of state outline when the prime minister is planning - secretary of state outline when the prime minister is planning to- secretary of state outline when the prime minister is planning to travel to betfast— prime minister is planning to travel to belfast to — prime minister is planning to travel to belfast to convene _ prime minister is planning to travel to belfast to convene talks - prime minister is planning to travel to belfast to convene talks and - prime minister is planning to travel. to belfast to convene talks and show the leadership— to belfast to convene talks and show the leadership this _ to belfast to convene talks and show the leadership this moment - to belfast to convene talks and show. the leadership this moment demands? what is _ the leadership this moment demands? what is the _ the leadership this moment demands? what is the strategy _ the leadership this moment demands? what is the strategy for _ the leadership this moment demands? what is the strategy for addressing - what is the strategy for addressing the toss— what is the strategy for addressing the toss of— what is the strategy for addressing the loss of trust _ what is the strategy for addressing the loss of trust amongst - what is the strategy for addressing the loss of trust amongst the - the loss of trust amongst the unionist— the loss of trust amongst the unionist and _ the loss of trust amongst the unionist and loyalist - the loss of trust amongst the - unionist and loyalist communities to demonstrate — unionist and loyalist communities to demonstrate that— unionist and loyalist communities to demonstrate that legitimate - demonstrate that legitimate grievances— demonstrate that legitimate grievances are _ demonstrate that legitimate grievances are being - demonstrate that legitimate grievances are being heard? demonstrate that legitimate - grievances are being heard? how demonstrate that legitimate _ grievances are being heard? how were representatives — grievances are being heard? how were representatives of _ grievances are being heard? how were representatives of the _ grievances are being heard? how were representatives of the northern - representatives of the northern iretand — representatives of the northern iretand being _ representatives of the northern ireland being brought— representatives of the northern ireland being brought into - ireland being brought into negotiations— ireland being brought into negotiations on— ireland being brought into negotiations on huge - ireland being brought into - negotiations on huge decisions affecting — negotiations on huge decisions affecting their— negotiations on huge decisions affecting their future _ negotiations on huge decisions affecting their future and - negotiations on huge decisions affecting their future and can l negotiations on huge decisions. affecting their future and can he detait— affecting their future and can he detail what— affecting their future and can he detail what practical— affecting their future and can he detail what practical solutions . affecting their future and can he i detail what practical solutions for government— detail what practical solutions for government are _ detail what practical solutions for government are seeking - detail what practical solutions for government are seeking with - detail what practical solutions for government are seeking with the| detail what practical solutions for. government are seeking with the eu to reduce _ government are seeking with the eu to reduce cheques— government are seeking with the eu to reduce cheques and _ government are seeking with the eu i to reduce cheques and requirements between _ to reduce cheques and requirements between britain _ to reduce cheques and requirements between britain and _ to reduce cheques and requirements between britain and northern - between britain and northern iretand? _ between britain and northern ireland? fundamentally- between britain and northern ireland? fundamentally the l between britain and northern - ireland? fundamentally the people of northern— ireland? fundamentally the people of northern ireland _ ireland? fundamentally the people of northern ireland have _ ireland? fundamentally the people of northern ireland have seen— ireland? fundamentally the people of northern ireland have seen politics i northern ireland have seen politics can work— northern ireland have seen politics can work and — northern ireland have seen politics can work and put— northern ireland have seen politics can work and put the _ northern ireland have seen politics can work and put the word - northern ireland have seen politics can work and put the word of - can work and put the word of politicians _ can work and put the word of politicians can _ can work and put the word of politicians can be _ can work and put the word of politicians can be trusted - can work and put the word of i politicians can be trusted again. can work and put the word of - politicians can be trusted again. in closing, _ politicians can be trusted again. in closing, recent _ politicians can be trusted again. in closing, recent weeks _ politicians can be trusted again. in closing, recent weeks have - politicians can be trusted again. in closing, recent weeks have starkly demonstrated _ closing, recent weeks have starkly demonstrated that _ closing, recent weeks have starkly demonstrated that peace - closing, recent weeks have starkly demonstrated that peace is- closing, recent weeks have starkly demonstrated that peace is an - demonstrated that peace is an ongoing — demonstrated that peace is an ongoing process _ demonstrated that peace is an ongoing process. it— demonstrated that peace is an ongoing process. it is- demonstrated that peace is an ongoing process. it is no- ongoing process. it is no coincidence _ ongoing process. it is no coincidence that- ongoing process. it is no| coincidence that violence ongoing process. it is no- coincidence that violence has ongoing process. it is no— coincidence that violence has flared in areas _ coincidence that violence has flared in areas of— coincidence that violence has flared in areas of profound _ coincidence that violence has flared in areas of profound deprivation - coincidence that violence has flared | in areas of profound deprivation and educational— in areas of profound deprivation and educational attainment _ in areas of profound deprivation and educational attainment is _ in areas of profound deprivation and educational attainment is too - in areas of profound deprivation and educational attainment is too low, i educational attainment is too low, paramilitary— educational attainment is too low, paramilitary activity— educational attainment is too low, paramilitary activity still _ paramilitary activity still criminatty _ paramilitary activity still criminally high, - paramilitary activity still criminally high, where l paramilitary activity still - criminally high, where children paramilitary activity still _ criminally high, where children are educated _ criminally high, where children are educated in— criminally high, where children are educated in segregated _ criminally high, where children are educated in segregated schools . criminally high, where children are l educated in segregated schools and .rew educated in segregated schools and grew up— educated in segregated schools and grew up in— educated in segregated schools and grew up in segregated _ educated in segregated schools andl grew up in segregated communities. for them, _ grew up in segregated communities. for them, the — grew up in segregated communities. for them, the promise _ grew up in segregated communities. for them, the promise of— grew up in segregated communities. for them, the promise of peace - grew up in segregated communities. for them, the promise of peace has| for them, the promise of peace has not arrived — for them, the promise of peace has not arrived a — for them, the promise of peace has not arrived. a toxic _ for them, the promise of peace has not arrived. a toxic combination - for them, the promise of peace has not arrived. a toxic combination of. not arrived. a toxic combination of deprivation — not arrived. a toxic combination of deprivation and _ not arrived. a toxic combination of deprivation and this _ not arrived. a toxic combination of deprivation and this regard - not arrived. a toxic combination of deprivation and this regard has - deprivation and this regard has failed — deprivation and this regard has failed deep _ deprivation and this regard has failed deep disillusionment. i deprivation and this regard hasi failed deep disillusionment. but deprivation and this regard has - failed deep disillusionment. but we must believe — failed deep disillusionment. but we must believe there _ failed deep disillusionment. but we must believe there is— failed deep disillusionment. but we must believe there is still— failed deep disillusionment. but we must believe there is still a - failed deep disillusionment. but we must believe there is still a deep. must believe there is still a deep ur-e must believe there is still a deep urge for— must believe there is still a deep urge for the _ must believe there is still a deep urge for the future _ must believe there is still a deep urge for the future where - urge for the future where reconciliation _ urge for the future where reconciliation walks - urge for the future where - reconciliation walks hand—in—hand with social— reconciliation walks hand—in—hand with socialjustice. _ reconciliation walks hand—in—hand with socialjustice. we _ reconciliation walks hand—in—hand with socialjustice. we saw- reconciliation walks hand—in—hand with socialjustice. we saw that i reconciliation walks hand—in—hand with socialjustice. we saw that in| with socialjustice. we saw that in the carriage — with socialjustice. we saw that in the carriage of— with socialjustice. we saw that in the carriage of communities - with socialjustice. we saw that in| the carriage of communities along betfast _ the carriage of communities along betfast this — the carriage of communities along belfast this past _ the carriage of communities along belfast this past week. _ the carriage of communities along belfast this past week. we - the carriage of communities along belfast this past week. we must i the carriage of communities along. belfast this past week. we must now see potiticat— belfast this past week. we must now see political leaders— belfast this past week. we must now see political leaders match _ belfast this past week. we must now see political leaders match that - see political leaders match that carriage — see political leaders match that carriage this— see political leaders match that carriage. this moment - see political leaders match that carriage. this moment must. see political leaders match that. carriage. this moment must mark see political leaders match that - carriage. this moment must mark the end of— carriage. this moment must mark the end of an _ carriage. this moment must mark the end of an era — carriage. this moment must mark the end of an era where _ carriage. this moment must mark the end of an era where northern - carriage. this moment must mark the end of an era where northern irelandi end of an era where northern ireland has been _ end of an era where northern ireland has been relegated _ end of an era where northern ireland has been relegated to _ end of an era where northern ireland has been relegated to little - end of an era where northern ireland has been relegated to little more - has been relegated to little more than an— has been relegated to little more than an afterthought _ has been relegated to little more than an afterthought and - has been relegated to little more than an afterthought and the - has been relegated to little more - than an afterthought and the promise of peace _ than an afterthought and the promise of peace attowed _ than an afterthought and the promise of peace allowed to _ than an afterthought and the promise of peace allowed to stall. _ than an afterthought and the promise of peace allowed to stall. it _ of peace allowed to stall. it demands _ of peace allowed to stall. it demands a _ of peace allowed to stall. it demands a collective - of peace allowed to stall. it l demands a collective renewal of peace allowed to stall. it - demands a collective renewal of our commitment — demands a collective renewal of our commitment to— demands a collective renewal of our commitment to the _ demands a collective renewal of our commitment to the agreement - demands a collective renewal of our commitment to the agreement and i demands a collective renewal of our. commitment to the agreement and the principles— commitment to the agreement and the principles which — commitment to the agreement and the principles which secured _ commitment to the agreement and the principles which secured it. _ commitment to the agreement and the principles which secured it. demands . principles which secured it. demands that the _ principles which secured it. demands that the vacuum _ principles which secured it. demands that the vacuum of _ principles which secured it. demands that the vacuum of leadership - principles which secured it. demands that the vacuum of leadership and i that the vacuum of leadership and strategy— that the vacuum of leadership and strategy that _ that the vacuum of leadership and strategy that northern _ that the vacuum of leadership and strategy that northern ireland - that the vacuum of leadership and . strategy that northern ireland needs is now— strategy that northern ireland needs is now fitted — strategy that northern ireland needs is now filled. the _ strategy that northern ireland needs is now filled. the prime _ strategy that northern ireland needs is now filled. the prime minister- is now filled. the prime minister must _ is now filled. the prime minister must face — is now filled. the prime minister must face up _ is now filled. the prime minister must face up to— is now filled. the prime minister must face up to the _ is now filled. the prime minister. must face up to the consequences is now filled. the prime minister- must face up to the consequences of his own _ must face up to the consequences of his own actions — must face up to the consequences of his own actions and _ must face up to the consequences of his own actions and show _ must face up to the consequences of his own actions and show the - his own actions and show the leadership— his own actions and show the leadership communities - his own actions and show the leadership communities are i his own actions and show the - leadership communities are crying out for _ leadership communities are crying out for i— leadership communities are crying out for. . ., leadership communities are crying out for. _, _, . ., out for. i welcome the condemnation ofthe out for. i welcome the condemnation of the violence _ out for. i welcome the condemnation of the violence and _ out for. i welcome the condemnation of the violence and support - out for. i welcome the condemnation of the violence and support for - out for. i welcome the condemnation of the violence and support for the i of the violence and support for the psi and others and who would surround the social fabric structure issues in northern ireland which i think we have a shared view on. particularly when we think about things like the failure to see the delivery of integrated education for example that was outlined in back in 1998. that's one of the areas we need to work on. we do need to recognise that there are people in these communities can see the benefit of what is happening and the opportunity moving forward in a positive way. she is right as well about her comments on the unionist community and the loyalist community. it's about ensuring our partners in the eu fully understand this issue around identity that people feel so passionately about in northern ireland and the impact the decision around article 16 had and the lasting impact it has had four people in that community. i welcome the fact the vice president met with civic society and business leaders three weeks ago and i would encourage him to do more of that to fully understand. she outlined a few times the protocols and the issues around protocols certainly have played an issue. that is why i am the prime minister have been cleared about our determination to find a way forward and we all remember the protocol as they are in place because of the unique circumstances of northern ireland. we have to make sure it works in a flexible way so it works for the people of northern ireland. it only works if it is —— if it is working for everyone across the community. she talks about talks and i have met with leaders on the executive as well as party leaders and will continue to do so. the prime minister has met with the business community. but we do support the established bodies that have been set up to resolve these issues. i am glad to hear she wants to see reduced cheques. ultimately i think we can back to being united on the fact the way forward is always through dialogue never through violence. that was the northern ireland secretary responding to the shadow northern ireland secretary and brandon lewis was accepting that there are issues around the northern ireland protocol which is a bowed down the irish sea post—brexit which has led to tensions particularly within the loyalist communities. but he said it was more complicated. young people are frustrated of the year of coronavirus uncertainty and perception that the covid rules haven't been adhered to by some members of the community. he said the answer obviously on the way forward his dialogue. in response the shadow minister said there were complex ministers —— complex reasons for attention but a deep sense of hurt and anger amongst communities and the growing instability has its roots in the fact that trust has been squandered of what boris johnson promised over brexit and what has come to pass. she says the prime minister must urgently convene talks. listening to that was sarah canning, the partner of the room key. she was a journalist who was shot dead two years ago as she was observing a riot in londonderry. your reaction to what you have heard in the commons. i your reaction to what you have heard in the commons.— your reaction to what you have heard in the commons. i think louise hague made fantastic _ in the commons. i think louise hague made fantastic points. _ in the commons. i think louise hague made fantastic points. she _ in the commons. i think louise hague made fantastic points. she hit - in the commons. i think louise hague made fantastic points. she hit the - made fantastic points. she hit the nail on the head time and again. brandon lewis was agreeing with her but i do think some of what he said was disingenuous. they have made these promises. it has government failing. they are the ones who need to step up to the plate. to reassure people... it was almost two years since the death of the level of your life and you are going to spend the rest of your years together. how are you doing? your years together. how are you doin: ? ., your years together. how are you doin.? ., ., .,, . your years together. how are you doin:? ., . .. your years together. how are you doing? not fantastic at the moment. particularly with _ doing? not fantastic at the moment. particularly with the _ doing? not fantastic at the moment. particularly with the rioting - particularly with the rioting happening, it has been a big trigger for me. the worry is that someone else will take the lead from the new ira that night and bring arms onto the streets. i am hoping nobody is that foolish because the condemnation of what happened to her was universal across communities in northern ireland and i would hate to think that another family would have to go through what we have gone through. 50 to go through what we have gone throu~h. ., . ., ., through. so the violence of last week brought _ through. so the violence of last week brought it _ through. so the violence of last week brought it all— through. so the violence of last week brought it all back - week brought it all back essentially?— week brought it all back essentially? week brought it all back essentiall? , , . week brought it all back essentiall? , . ., essentially? definitely. so much of it looked like _ essentially? definitely. so much of it looked like that _ essentially? definitely. so much of it looked like that night. _ essentially? definitely. so much of it looked like that night. masked i it looked like that night. masked people on the streets throwing petrol bombs. one of the big difference was it was in interface areas without what happens to lire it was a nationalist area. but that is also frightening because when two communities came against each other there is always the potential that it could completely degenerate and go to something we don't want to see where the two sides are bringing weapons back onto the streets. thank ou so weapons back onto the streets. thank you so much — weapons back onto the streets. thank you so much for— weapons back onto the streets. thank you so much for your _ weapons back onto the streets. thank you so much for your time _ weapons back onto the streets. thank you so much for your time this - you so much for your time this afternoon. we really appreciated and thank you for your patience as we heard the statement from the northern ireland secretary. the prime minister has insisted the review he's ordered into the collapsed finance firm that david cameron lobbied for, greensill capital, will be given free reign. but labour says the scope of the investigation is inadequate. it wants a full parliamentary inquiry into what it calls the "rampant cronyism" in government. how did former primus of david cameron used his contacts in westminster and did his employer benefit from his efforts? the government is holding a review of schemes the company was involved in headed by a lawyer. i schemes the company was involved in headed by a lawyer.— headed by a lawyer. i would like it to be done — headed by a lawyer. i would like it to be done quickly _ headed by a lawyer. i would like it to be done quickly but _ headed by a lawyer. i would like it to be done quickly but i _ headed by a lawyer. i would like it to be done quickly but i want - headed by a lawyer. i would like it to be done quickly but i want him| headed by a lawyer. i would like it i to be done quickly but i want him to have the maximum possible access so we can all understand exactly what happened and that will be presented to parliament in due course. in to parliament in due course. in parliament there are lots of questions already for the health secretary who whence full for a drink with them after the finance firm had proposed using an app it had devised in the nhs. i firm had proposed using an app it had devised in the nhs. i attended a social meeting _ had devised in the nhs. i attended a social meeting organised _ had devised in the nhs. i attended a social meeting organised by - had devised in the nhs. i attended a social meeting organised by the - social meeting organised by the former— social meeting organised by the former prime minister and given that departmental business came up i have reported _ departmental business came up i have reported to _ departmental business came up i have reported to officials in the normal wav~ _ reported to officials in the normal wa , ., reported to officials in the normal wa. , ., way. labour accused the government of a pattern — way. labour accused the government of a pattern of— way. labour accused the government of a pattern of behaviour. _ way. labour accused the government of a pattern of behaviour. it - way. labour accused the government of a pattern of behaviour. it is - of a pattern of behaviour. it is cronyism and it stinks. so if he thinks he has done nothing wrong and has nothing to hide will you publish all the minutes and all the e—mails and all the correspondence and all the directions that he gave to civil servants and all his text messages with david cameron so we can see exactly what went on with the awarding of this contract. there were questions _ awarding of this contract. there were questions for _ awarding of this contract. there were questions for the - awarding of this contract. there j were questions for the business secretary too. last year greenhill was chosen to give loans to other companies like the owners of liberty steel as part of a government... the british bank which ran it said it wasn't lobbied by mr cameron. presumably mr cameron didn't lobby you or— presumably mr cameron didn't lobby you or officials in the department. i you or officials in the department. i never— you or officials in the department. i never received a single phone call from _ i never received a single phone call from mr— i never received a single phone call from mr cameron _ i never received a single phone call from mr cameron.— i never received a single phone call from mr cameron. lobbying is a usual art of from mr cameron. lobbying is a usual part of politics — from mr cameron. lobbying is a usual part of politics and _ from mr cameron. lobbying is a usual part of politics and david _ from mr cameron. lobbying is a usual part of politics and david cameron - part of politics and david cameron says he didn't break any rules although he said there were lessons to be learned. labour says the review isn't enough. tomorrow it will force a vote to try and get mps to run their own investigation. jonathan blake has been giving us more details. 50 jonathan blake has been giving us more details-— more details. so far then the government _ more details. so far then the government is _ more details. so far then the government is resisting - government is resisting notwithstanding the review announced by the prime minister yesterday calls from labour to take a broader look at lobbying in general aside from the issue of green cell capital and the access it has had to government but i don't think we will see any letup from labour in its attempts to get the government to grasp this issue more firmly. and grasp this issue more firmly. and the review _ grasp this issue more firmly. and the review that _ grasp this issue more firmly. and the review that downing street announced yesterday, i heard the prime minister saying this morning it was a review into supply chain finance. is it also review into lobbying or not? it’s finance. is it also review into lobbying or not? finance. is it also review into lobb in: or not? h , ., lobbying or not? it's interesting on the sco -e lobbying or not? it's interesting on the scope of _ lobbying or not? it's interesting on the scope of this _ lobbying or not? it's interesting on the scope of this review _ lobbying or not? it's interesting on the scope of this review is - the scope of this review is something which is now a real issue here at westminster because the prime minister did this morning say that review would have carte blanche to look into the issue of supply chain finance and how far it's chain finance and how far its present government. that really is the scope of this review and when it was announced yesterday did say that it would have a particular focus on green cell capital and its provision of supply chain finance, this method of supply chain finance, this method of supplying credit to companies to allow them to pay their bills more quickly than they normally would do. but it's not clear how far it will look into david cameron's efforts to lobby on behalf of green cell capital in government and if at all it will take a view on lobbying and the rules and whether they need to change on that more generally. it doesn't seem the scope of the review is set up to do that so that's another reason why i don't think we will see any letup in the pressure from labour and others to shine a light on the practice of lobbying and an attempt to change it and the way it works at westminster at the moment. there's been a second night of unrest in minneapolis, where riot police confronted crowds of protesters angered by the shooting dead of a black man. police say one of their officers meant to use a taser on the suspect — but accidentally drew her gun instead. in the same city, the trial of a former police officer accused of murdering another black man, george floyd, continues. peter bowes reports. another tense night. unrest on the streets of minneapolis in response to the police killing of another black man. this was already a city on edge. the renewed anger and frustration follows the death of daunte wright, a 20—year—old motorist who was shot by a female officer after he was stopped for a minor offence. he'd attempted to escape and the police tried to arrest him on a previous warrant. this bodycam footage shows what the police chief said was a fatal mistake. taser, taser, taser! it is my belief that the officer had the intention to deploy their taser, but instead shot mr wright with a single bullet. the swift release of the bodycam video appears to have been an attempt by the police to show transparency in the face of immediate criticism. presidentjoe biden said he had watched what he called the graphic footage, and he was waiting for an investigation to determine whether the shooting was an accident. in the meantime, he said people should stay calm. there is absolutely no justification — none — for looting, no justification for violence. peaceful protest, understandable, and the fact is that, you know, we do know that the anger, pain and trauma that exists in the black community in that environment is real, it is serious and it is consequential. but it will notjustify violence and/or looting. the minneapolis trial of derek chauvin, the former police officer accused of murdering george floyd, is moving into its final stages. the latest witness, mr floyd's brother, told the jury about his family. that's my mother. she is no longer with us right now. that's my oldest brother, george. i miss both of them. i was married, may 24th i got married. and my brother was killed may 25th, and my mom died on may 30th. it is like a bittersweet month, because i was supposed to be happy when that month comes. over the next few days, derek chauvin's lawyers will present the jury with their case. as the trial winds up, extra security — members of the national guard — are being drafted in around the courthouse and across the city as emotions run high. peter bowes, bbc news, los angeles. the world's richest people will have to radically change their lifestyles if climate change is to be tackled, according to new research. the cambridge sustainability commission said the wealthiest five per cent, were responsible for more than a third of the growth in emissions between 1990 and 2015. it says people will need to fly less, insulate their property and ditch polluting cars. here's roger harrabin. take off for the sunshine. pollution from flying is growing, but it is routine for many of us in rich nations. the more you fly, the more you pollute, so the commission says frequent flyers should pay more tax. the government says collecting flight data might breach privacy, but the reports's authors say the rich must change. that class of individuals, the 1% all the 5% you just referred to, that lead to the most carbon intensive lifestyles, whose behaviour needs to be targeted by a range of different policies and measures. what we're arguing is for a shrink and share reports, we need to shrink the carbon budget to bring it in line with paris targets which all governments have signed up to, but within that, share that responsibility fairly. the gulf in emissions between rich and poor is vast. the wealthy 1% of people in its twice as much climate heating gases as the poorest half of the world's population put together. this clearly must change, the report says. change is coming. take britain's offshore wind farms, they produce clean energy. take this floating wind farm in scotland, producing clean energy. technology will help cure the climate problem. government policy should not focus on penalising people and their political lifestyles that should be encouraging people to take up clean technologies. we have a good array of clean technologies, from the electric car to the heat pump, we should be making those as attractive as possible. but technology hasn't stopped emissions rising. that is partly because people are driving ever bigger cars. there is much support for taxing or banning large suvs like these. the report says the rich must lead the way in cutting emissions. their homes are part of the climate problem too. rich versus poor, it'll be a theme this year. president biden's convening a climate summit next week and the uk's hosting another in november. they won't be allowed to forget, it is mostly the wealthy who have overheated the planet. roger harrabin, bbc news, london. the un has warned that the military clampdown on protests in myanmar over recent months risks escalating the country intoa civil conflict like that seen in syria. un high commissioner for human rights michelle bachelet appealed for an end to what she called the slaughter. in a statement she said over 3,000 people have been detained and there are reports that 23 people have been sentenced to death following secret trials. she warned the international community must not allow the deadly mistakes of the past in syria and elsewhere to be repeated. the loosening of restrictions in england has meant a rush to the pub and the great outdoors. campsites and holiday parks across the country have seen their first visitors of the year. danjohnson has been to meet them. it's been a busy start to this late season and in shropshire, people got the chance to spend their first night away as restrictions eased. they've been making the most of it. i've been really looking forward to it, i've been stuck in my house now for 12 months, working, its been nice to get a nice break away. it was very warm in there but it was nice to wake up to a bit of frost this morning, it's a good excuse to jump in the hot tub later. so good to be away, especially after covid home—schooling and now we've got kayaking and paddle boarding. yes, it's going to be really good. are you looking forward to it? very excited. what's it been like stuck at home? very boring! not fun! some are ready to start the day in a really refreshing way! oh, my god! you're not regretting it, are you? no, not at all! but a wet suit would be nice! for the owners, it's been an unprecedented time. the toughest year. so they hope this is the start of a summer of recovery. i think the tourism industry, all industries have had a really tough time but obviously when your business is closed like it has been, or turnover is down 30 or 40%, we need to reopen and we're full this weekend. you know, we've got to make sure we don't break down, some of the hot tubs are late being delivered but it's great to see the people back. caravans have returned to the peak district but what was that they used to say in the scouts? be prepared. the toilet blocks are closed until the 17th of may due to government guidelines so i think from then, we will have a lot more bookings. but people are still happy to come, using their own facilities. from now. we've even got a tent arrived today for four nights! splashdown at southport pleasure land, after a year when rides were mostly off limits, restricting family fun and putting places like this under threat. it's nice to be open again, a lovely sunny day. we couldn't hope for more. it's really nice to be back in work, making all the kids and all the families happy. it doesn't matter what marketing we do or what offers we make, the sun is the best thing in the world for us. ain't that the truth? fingers crossed, it keeps shining and covid stays under control. danjohnson, bbc news, shropshire. now it's time for a look at the weather with ben rich. if you are spending more time outdoors this week a dry outlook could be welcome, but if you are a gardener you might be looking for some rain by now. not a lot of that in the forecast. it stays cool by day and the risk of frost and fog at night. on the satellite picture you can see all the main ring bearing weather systems are staying well away from our shows, fended off by this area of high pressure. this will be with us for a few days yet. often under high pressure we can expect completely dry weather but that's not the case at the moment. there are a few showers popping up especially across western and southern parts of the uk. those showers quite slow moving because of the winds are pretty light. but many spots staying dry with temperatures between eight and 12 degrees. through tonight, most of those showers will fade but some areas of patchy cloud left behind and patches of mist and fog developing. a widespread ground frost and not as cold as it was the most of us last night. into tomorrow, it's a similar day with sunny spells. one or two showers popping up. the wind is not much of the future for most of us, light winds in many places. but look at these north sea coasts and look where the wind is coming from, it's coming in off the chilly waters of the sea. so temperatures in these towns and cities on the east coast will be suppressed. a fair breeze blowing across coastal parts of east anglia and the south—east. further west that is where we will have the highest temperatures. as we head through wednesday night into thursday they could be some frost again with high pressure still firmly in charge. the orientation of that high bringing a feed of chilly air of the north sea. we could also see some showers creeping in from the east affecting parts of east anglia and the south—east but otherwise largely dry with spells of sunshine and once again the highest temperatures will be out west. for the end of the week, most places will stay dry. a little bit of rain in the far north—west at times and temperatures climbing a little bit. hello, this is bbc news, i'm victoria derbyshire. good afternoon, here are the headlines. if you're over 45 and in england you can now book a covid jab. it comes after the government said everyone in the top nine priority groups has now been offered a first vaccine, ahead of its target. we're going now to the 16—49 group, they're being asked to come forward. travelling around scotland will be allowed from friday — 10 days earlier than planned. the prime minister insists the review he's ordered into greensill — the collapsed finance firm that david cameron lobbied for — will be given free rein. but labour says the investigation's scope is in adequate. scope is inadequate. another night of unrest in the us city of minneapolis after police shot dead a black man. it comes as the high—profile derek chauvin murder trial continues — the defense is expected to begin its case today. good afternoon and welcome to bbc news. if you're over 45 and in england you can now book your covid jab, as the vaccination programme enters its next phase. everyone over fifty or in a high risk group has now been offered a first dose, according to the government, and ministers say they're on track to offer all adults a vaccine by the end ofjuly. it comes as officals race to contain �*significant�* new cases of the south african variant in south london, where hundreds of thousands of residents have been asked to come forward for tests. the prime minister has warned infections will rise as the economy reopens, and urged people to continue to be cautious. jim reed reports. another major milestone for the vaccination programme. all over 50s and those in high—risk groups in the uk have now been offered that first dose. at this vaccination centre in reading, they will now be inviting the next age group down. it's great that we've managed to achieve the target of getting everybody in the one to nine groups vaccinated by the deadline, a little bit ahead, actually. and we are now going to the 16—49 group, they are being asked to come forward. all those aged 45 and up can now use the nhs website to book appointments. the site appeared to crash this morning as thousands more tried to get a slot, though it is now back up and running. overall, more than 32 million people have had at least one jab of the astrazeneca and pfizer vaccines. going forward, though, the nhs will have to give a shot to all those coming back for a second booster dose, while at the same time trying to keep first doses going for those younger age groups. are you feeling well today? yeah, i'm feeling fine. today the first jabs using a third vaccine, made by the american firm moderna, are being given in england following a roll—out in wales and scotland. the supply forecast gives us confidence that assuming those supplies carry on as expected, then yes, we will not only deliver on the april 15th milestone of everybody aged 50 and above having had the chance for a vaccine, but all adults by the end ofjuly. all this comes at an important time in this pandemic. pub gardens and shops in england are now open for the first time this year. the successful vaccine roll—out has helped drive down infections and deaths. but scientists say the public still needs to follow the rules to avoid another wave of infections. the vaccines are only one part of the solution to the problem. people do need to continue to be careful and to avoid infecting each other. you can have this infection without realising it and so there is a risk. there are now all these tests available that people can obtain to test themselves and people should use those and i, certainly, for one, am going to continue to take a lot of care. and today another reminder of how easily this virus can spread. every resident of two london boroughs, wandsworth and lambeth, is being asked to take a pcr covid test. that is after a large cluster of infections caused by a variant of the virus first found in south africa. we have an outbreak _ that we are aware of in a local care home but we also know there has been some spread to the wider community. and we've been testing and tracing contacts from that outbreak. - but what we want to do now is check there is no further spread _ across our boroughs, _ both in lambeth and wandsworth. lambeth council says it is fairly confident it has the outbreak under control, but all those living in the boroughs, plus anyone who travels through, have been told they should get tested to reduce the chance of it spreading. jim reed reporting there. america's health authorities have recommended pausing the use of the johnson&johnson covid vaccine after six cases of severe blood clots in people who've had it. nearly seven million people in the united states have been given the vaccine. the uk has ordered 30 million doses, though it hasn't been approved by regulators yet. a short time ago laura foster — who's our health correspondent — explained why american health officials had made the decision to pause the jab being used. the key phrase that is being bandied about is "under an abundance of caution", and that basically means that the health agencies have said the risk of this very rare blood clot is very low, but let's do the steps we can to ensure that there is no chance the risk happening of this... of this thing which is very low risk. so six women have experienced this rare but severe blood clot, one has died and one is in a serious condition in hospital. they've all had one jab of the j&j vaccine. and that's out of 7 million people in the states who have had the johnson&johnson vaccine? yes, just over 6.8 million jabs. so six out of 6.8 million, bit of rough maths, that's 0.00009%. and what they're looking at now is what caused these clots, and the idea is to cover everything and try and work out what has happened. scotland's first minister, nicola sturgeon, has brought forward the easing of some covid restrictions — ten days earlier than expected. she also said the limits on how many people can meet outdoors will increase to six adults from six households. a short time ago i spoke to our correspondent lorna gordon who's in glasgow — said nicola sturgeon's announcement will be welcomed by many. some big, significant changes coming earlier than expected and it's all to do is set stay local restriction here in scotland that was meant to stay in place until april 26, so that's a little under two week's time, it would have been a week on monday it was lifted, but nicola sturgeon today announcing that because the data, the number of cases, are all moving in the right direction, the case numbers are falling and falling quite fast and dramatically, in part because of that vaccination programme, she says they're bringing forward, accelerating the route map out of lockdown and that the stay local restriction will be lifted on friday. at that point, family and friends can travel across scotland for recreation, to see each other, as long as they stay outside. one other key chains that comes in on friday, the four people from the two different households that are allowed to meet up outdoors will change to six people from six households being allowed to meet at stores, and that of course doesn't include children under 12, who are include children under 12, who are in addition to any limited group members that are meeting. at the stay local restriction is being lifted on friday, a lot of people will be very pleased to hear that they can meet family and friends who live outside of their council area again. i live outside of their council area aaain. ., live outside of their council area aaain. . ., . �*, again. i mean, for a politician's oint of again. i mean, for a politician's point of view. _ again. i mean, for a politician's point of view, this _ again. i mean, for a politician's point of view, this is _ again. i mean, for a politician's point of view, this is good - again. i mean, for a politician's. point of view, this is good news, they're bringing these restrictions, they're bringing these restrictions, the easing of them forward, but they also are still pushing the message we have to still social distance, you know, be outside, all of that sort of stuff, so they are treading a fine line?— a fine line? they are. and it's interesting — a fine line? they are. and it's interesting of _ a fine line? they are. and it's interesting of course, - a fine line? they are. and it's interesting of course, that. a fine line? they are. and it's| interesting of course, that this a fine line? they are. and it's i interesting of course, that this is coming in the middle of an election campaign. the first minister nicola sturgeon here insisting this has nothing to do with the election campaign, she is saying this is purely data driven and the fact that they are legally obliged to reduce restrictions as soon as they are able to. but you are right, it's a very cautious path they have to tread. last week we saw herez reopen here in scotland, some garden centres were allowed to reopen. —— hairdressers reopened. schools this week, secondary schools are allowed to reopen, though the reality is most people will be back next week after the easter holidays. but the changes are incremental and they have to watch carefully and make sure the number of positive cases doesn't increase as the restrictions ease. so this change will happen on friday and then they will obviously watch figures very closely because the next big changes are expected in april 26 at that point, jim will reopen, all shops will reopen, —— gyms will reopen, or outdoor hospitality or reopen, in the hospitality or reopen, in the hospitality will be allowed to reopen on a restricted basis. organisations are blunting the pub trade are critical of that, they say there's no point, unless they can serve alcohol inter�*s there is no point opening up indoor spaces. but it's a slow process. cross—border travel will be allowed on a per 26 but they will watch figures very closely. it is also worth noting international travel is still not back, not on the cards yet. and that is nicola sturgeon says, because they're worried about variants abroad. they are going to try and agreed on a four nation but she says for now, the price to open up at home might be to continue those restrictions about travelling abroad for a little longer. the prime minister has insisted the review he's ordered into the collapsed finance firm that david cameron lobbied for, greensill capital, will be given free rein. but labour says the scope of the investigation is inadequate. it wants a full parliamentary inquiry into what it calls the "rampant cronyism" in government. helen catt reports. how did former prime minister david cameron use his contacts in westminster, and did his employer lex greensill benefit from his efforts? the government is holding a review of schemes the company was involved in, headed by a lawyer. i would like it to be done quickly, but i want him to have the maximum possible access and so we can all understand exactly what happened and that will of course be presented to parliament in due course. in parliament, there are lots of questions already for the health secretary, who went for a drink with mr cameron and mr greensill after the finance firm had proposed using an app it had devised in the nhs. absolutely, i attended a social meeting organised by the former prime minister. and given that departmental business came up, i reported it to officials in the normal way. labour accused the government of a pattern of behaviour. it is cronyism and it stinks. so if he thinks he has done nothing wrong and has nothing to hide, - will he publish all of the minutes, all the e—mails, all— the correspondence, _ all the directions he gave to civil servants and all his text messages with david cameron so we can- see exactly what went on with the awarding i of his contract? there are questions for the business secretary, too. last year greensill was chosen to give loans to other companies, like the owners of liberty steel, as part of a government scheme to help businesses through the pandemic. the british business bank, which ran it, said it wasn't lobbied by mr cameron. the business secretary was asked if he had been. presumably mr cameron didn't lobby you, ministers or officials in the department in...? i have never received a single phone call whatsoever from mr cameron. lobbying is a usual part of politics, and david cameron says he didn't break any rules, although he said there were lessons to be learned. labour says the review isn't enough. tomorrow it will force a vote to try to get mps to run their own investigation. our political correspondentjonthan blake has been giving us more details on where we stand with this story. so far then the government is resisting, notwithstanding the review announced by the prime minister yesterday, calls from labour to take a broader look at lobbying in general, aside from the issue of greensill capital and the access it has had to government, but i don't think we will see any letup from labour in its attempts to get the government to grasp this issue more firmly. and the review that downing street announced yesterday, i heard the prime minister talking about it this morning. he was very specifically saying it was a review into supply chain finance. is it also a review into lobbying or not? yes, it's interesting, and the scope of this review is something which is now a real issue here at westminster because as you say, the prime minister did this morning say that that review would have carte blanche to look into the issue of supply chain finance and how far it's present in government. and that really is the scope of this review, and when it was announced yesterday it did say...downing street did say that it would have a particularfocus on greensill capital and its provision of supply chain finance, this method of supplying credit to companies to allow them to pay their bills more quickly than they normally would do. but it's not clear how far it will look into david cameron's efforts to lobby on behalf of greensill capital in government, and if at all it will take a view on lobbying and the rules and whether they need to change on that at westminster more generally. it doesn't seem the scope of the review is set up to do that, so that's another reason why i don't think we will see any letup in the pressure from labour and others to shine a light on the practice of lobbying and an attempt to reform it and change it and the way it works at westminster at the moment. trade between the uk and the eu partially recovered in february, after a steep drop following brexit. separate data also suggests the economy grew that month, as dharshini david explains. well, we saw the biggest changes in our trading arrangements in over a0 years and yes that has prompted some very big numbers. and as you say, to start the year we saw a big slump injanuary in the sales of goods to europe and that prompted fears that perhaps we saw traders overwhelmed by the extra paperwork and checks they had to go through. but when we got to february's figures it was a different story. we saw a 46.6% rise in exports to the eu, which confirmed what some companies had already told us, that they were simply staying away from the borders because they were concerned about disruption and delays injanuary and they had shipped goods ahead of time to try and avoid that. now they are back trading once again and other firms are getting to grips with the new changes. but having said all of that, if you look at the level of exports they are still well below where they were for much of 2020. there are two things going on there, there is of course the pandemic and that is dampening demand amongst a lot of our competitors out there, but there is also the case that many exporters, particularly when it comes to areas like fresh food, are still struggling with the volume of the new formalities they have to go through and they are urging more help from the government. they say without that, not just profits, butjobs could suffer. and the economy also grew slightly in february? it did. we know the drill here, don't we? we have a lockdown and much of activity in our economy gets paused and what we saw in february obviously was when we were in the throes of that lockdown things did get paused. up byjust 0.4% for output. but here is the better news. economists are saying as we reopen now, it's a chance for us to see the recovery take off. but how much by? it depends how much we spend in the shops. consumers are the key to all of this. the headlines on bbc news: if you're over 45 and in england you can now book a covid jab. it comes after the government said everyone in the top 9 priority groups has now been offered a first vaccine, ahead of its target. travelling around scotland will be allowed from friday, 10 days earlier than planned. the prime minister insists the review he's ordered into greensill — the collapsed finance firm that david cameron lobbied for — will be given free reign. but labour says the investigation�*s scope is in adequate. scope is inadequate. there's been a second night of unrest in minneapolis, where riot police confronted crowds of protesters angered by the shooting dead of a black man. police say one of their officers meant to use a taser on the suspect — but accidentally drew her gun instead. in the same city, the trial of a former police officer accused of murdering another black man, george floyd, continues. peter bowes reports. another tense night. unrest on the streets of minneapolis in response to the police killing of another black man. this was already a city on edge. the renewed anger and frustration follows the death of daunte wright, a 20—year—old motorist who was shot by a female officer after he was stopped for a minor offence. he'd attempted to escape and the police tried to arrest him on a previous warrant. this bodycam footage shows what the police chief said was a fatal mistake. taser, taser, taser! it is my belief that the officer had the intention to deploy their taser, but instead shot mr wright with a single bullet. the swift release of the bodycam video appears to have been an attempt by the police to show transparency in the face of immediate criticism. presidentjoe biden said he had watched what he called the graphic footage, and he was waiting for an investigation to determine whether the shooting was an accident. in the meantime, he said people should stay calm. there is absolutely no justification — none — for looting, no justification for violence. peaceful protest, understandable, and the fact is that, you know, we do know that the anger, pain and trauma that exists in the black community in that environment is real, it is serious and it is consequential. but it will notjustify violence and/or looting. the minneapolis trial of derek chauvin, the former police officer accused of murdering george floyd, is moving into its final stages. the latest witness, mr floyd's brother, told the jury about his family. that's my mother. she is no longer with us right now. that's my oldest brother, george. i miss both of them. i was married, may 24th i got married. and my brother was killed may 25th, and my mom died on may 30th. it is like a bittersweet month, because i was supposed to be happy when that month comes. over the next few days, derek chauvin�*s lawyers will present the jury with their case. as the trial winds up, extra security — members of the national guard — are being drafted in around the courthouse and across the city as emotions run high. peter bowes, bbc news, los angeles. the trial of derek chauvin did resume about a quarter of an hour or so ago. there are lots of technical legal arguments. so ago. there are lots of technical legalarguments. it so ago. there are lots of technical legal arguments. it has adjourned for ten minutes and is meant to be starting again in the next ten minutes or so, starting again in the next ten minutes orso, and starting again in the next ten minutes or so, and we are expecting his defence team to put their arguments to thejury. his defence team to put their arguments to the jury. derek chauvin denies murder. we will be back alive at the trial, hopefully in the next ten minutes or so. —— we will be back live at the trial. around a million students in england are expected to find out when they'll be allowed to resume in—person teaching. it's expected that they may have to wait another month until 17th may to return to campus accommodation and lessons. universities uk has written to the government asking for that date to be brought forward. our education correspondent elaine dunkley reports. the impact of the pandemic on student life has been far—reaching. nearly a million students in england are still waiting for guidance from the government on when they can return to in—person lectures and accommodation. the road map out of lockdown has left some students feeling lost. we are not overly sure what's going on, it's a bit unsettling. the university are trying to adapt to that as well, the uncertainty of what is going to happen. that has made us feel a little bit on edge. i don't know. a little bit nervous. i wish they would just give us some certainty, even if it was bad news, just something to know where we are going. students on practical courses including science and creative arts were allowed to return to campuses in march. throughout the pandemic, those studying courses such as medicine, dentistry and social work have been able to continue at university. but there is concern that many students have been left in limbo. the pandemic has had its greatest effect on mental health in young people. and that population includes students, and i genuinely believe it is in the very best interests of our students for them to be back on campus so that we can give them the support they need and they've also got their peer support, and i can't stress how important that peer support is. this is what the government is keen to avoid, a repeat of the spike in cases that followed the mass migration of students last september. universities are keen to reassure that they are covid safe. we have our own testing centre, where students get tested twice a week so we can be sure we are controlling any infection if it were to arise. we have social distancing in the lecture rooms and we have changed the ventilation arrangements in the lecture rooms so they are fully ventilated to the outside. in england, the government promised a review at easter but many students are still none the wiser about when they can't ——can return to university life. elaine dunkley, bbc news. the world's richest people will have to radically change their lifestyles if climate change is to be tackled, according to new research. the cambridge sustainability commission said the wealthiest 5% were responsible for more than a third of the growth in emissions between 1990 and 2015. it says people will need to fly less, insulate their property and ditch polluting cars. here's roger harrabin. take off for the sunshine. pollution from flying is growing, but it is routine for many of us in rich nations. the more you fly, the more you pollute, so the commission says frequent flyers should pay more tax. the government says collecting flight data might breach privacy, but the report's authors say the rich must change. that class of individuals, the i% or the 5% you just referred to, that lead the most carbon intensive lifestyles, whose behaviour needs to be targeted by a range of different policies and measures. what we're arguing in the report is for a shrink and share approach, we need to shrink the carbon budget to bring it in line with paris targets which all governments have signed up to, but within that, share that responsibility fairly. the gulf in emissions between rich and poor is vast. the wealthy i% of people emits twice as much climate heating gases as the poorest half of the world's population put together. this clearly must change, the report says. change is coming. take britain's offshore wind farms — they produce clean energy. technology will help cure the climate problem. i think government policy should not focus on penalising people and their polluting lifestyles but should be instead encouraging people to take up clean technologies. we have a huge array now of clean technologies, that can help us to tackle climate change from the electric car to the heat pump, and we should be trying to make those as attractive as possible. but technology hasn't stopped emissions rising. that is partly because people are driving ever—bigger cars. there is much support for taxing or banning large suvs like these. the report says the rich must lead the way in cutting emissions. rich versus poor — it'll be a theme this year. president biden's convening a climate summit next week and the uk's hosting another in november. they won't be allowed to forget — it is mostly the wealthy who have overheated the planet. roger harrabin, bbc news, london. the loosening of restrictions in england has meant a rush to the pub and the great outdoors. campsites and holiday parks across the country have seen their first visitors of the year and danjohnson has been to meet some of them. it's been a busy start to this late season, and in shropshire, people got the chance to spend their first night away as restrictions eased. they've been making the most of it. i've been really looking forward to it. i've been stuck in my house now for 12 months, working, it's been nice to get a nice break away. it was very warm in there but it was nice to wake up to a bit of frost this morning, it's a good excuse to jump in the hot tub later. so good to be away, especially after covid, home—schooling and now we've got kayaking and paddle boarding, woodland school. busy day. yes, it's going to be really good. are you looking forward to it? very excited. what's it been like stuck at home? very boring! not fun! some were ready to start the day in a really refreshing way. oh, my god! you're not regretting it, are you? no, not at all! but a wet suit would be nice! for the owners, it's been an unprecedented time. the toughest year. so they hope this is the start of a summer of recovery. i think the tourism industry, well, all industries have had a really tough time but obviously when your business is closed like it has been, i think our turnover is down 30 or 40%, we need to reopen. and it's good, we're full this weekend. you know, we've got to make sure we don't break down, some of the hot tubs are late being delivered, but it's great to see the people back. caravans have returned to the peak district, but what was that they used to say in the scouts? be prepared. the toilet blocks are closed until the 17th of may due to government guidelines, so i think from then we will have a lot more bookings. but people are still happy to come, using their own facilities from now. we've even got a tent arrived today for four nights! splashdown at southport�*s pleasureland after a year when rides were mostly off limits, restricting family fun and putting places like this under threat. it's nice to be open again, a lovely sunny day. we couldn't hope for more, really. it's really nice to be back in work, making all the kids and all the families happy again. it doesn't matter what marketing we do or what offers we make, the sun is the best thing in the world for us. ain't that the truth? fingers crossed, it keeps shining and covid stays under control. danjohnson bbc news, shropshire. now it's time for a look at the weather. hello. we've seen some terrace p°ppin9 hello. we've seen some terrace p°pping up hello. we've seen some terrace popping up in places today but for many spots, it remains dry and a lot of dry weather in the outlook for the next few days. —— some showers p°ppin9 the next few days. —— some showers p°pping up- the next few days. —— some showers popping up. but rather cool at times, and by night there is the continued risk of frost and fog. it will turn chilly again through tonight, any daytime showers should fade to leave patches of cloud floating around, some mist and fog patches developing in places as well. temperatures unbalance not quite as low as last night, widespread ground frost and air frost for some but lowest value is likely in north—east scotland, loves values —5 or —6. tomorrow, a similar day, spells of sunshine, one or two showers developing, but with the wind coming off the north sea it will feel quite chilly. 8 or 9, higher temperatures for the west, getting up to 12 or 13. the end of the week, staying dry for most of us and temperatures willjust show signs of starting to creep upwards. hello, this is bbc news. the headlines: if you're over 45 and in england you can now book a covid jab. it comes after the government said everyone in the top nine priority groups has now been offered a first vaccine, ahead of its target. travelling around scotland will be allowed from friday, 10 days earlier than planned. the prime minister insists the review he's ordered into greensill, the collapsed finance firm that david cameron lobbied for, will be given free reign. but labour says the investigation's scope is in adequate. another night of unrest in the us city of minneapolis after police shot dead a black man. it comes as the high profile murder trial continues. the defence is expected to begin his case today. the un has warned that the military clampdown on protests in myanmar over recent months risks escalating the country intoa civil conflict like that seen in syria. un high commissioner for human rights michelle bachelet appealed for an end to what she called the slaughter. in a statement she said over 3,000 people have been detained and there are reports that 23 people have been sentenced to death following secret trials. she warned the international community must not allow the deadly mistakes of the past in syria and elsewhere to be repeated. ukraine's foreign minister has met the nato secretary generaljens stoltenberg in brussels to highlight a russian troop build—up on the border. clashes have intensified between ukrainian troops and russian—backed fighters in eastern ukraine. kyiv says 40,000 russian troops are massed near the border. the us secretary of state anthony blinken is also in brussels and had this to say. the united states stands firmly behind — the united states stands firmly behind the sovereignty and integrity of the _ behind the sovereignty and integrity of the ukraine and i am here to reaffirm — of the ukraine and i am here to reaffirm that with the prime minister— reaffirm that with the prime minister today. reaffirm that with the prime ministertoday. it reaffirm that with the prime minister today. it is particularly important at a time when we are seeing— important at a time when we are seeing unfortunately russia take very provocative action when it comes— very provocative action when it comes to — very provocative action when it comes to ukraine. we are now seeing the largest— comes to ukraine. we are now seeing the largest concentration of russian forces _ the largest concentration of russian forces on _ the largest concentration of russian forces on ukraine's border since 2014 _ forces on ukraine's border since 2014 that— forces on ukraine's border since 2014. that is a deep concern not only— 2014. that is a deep concern not only to _ 2014. that is a deep concern not only to the — 2014. that is a deep concern not only to the ukraine but the united states— only to the ukraine but the united states and indeed to many of our allies— states and indeed to many of our allies and — states and indeed to many of our allies and partners. the prime minister— allies and partners. the prime minister hasjust come from a session— minister hasjust come from a session and i have been consulting with our— session and i have been consulting with our close needle partners in the days— with our close needle partners in the days ahead. about the situation. just as the second wave of the virus is sweeping across india, millions of people travelled to the northern city of haridwar to mark a hindu religious festival by bathing in the ganges river. translation: we were afraid that we were coming - during covid—19 and nothing should happen to us. but by the grace of the mother goddess ganges, everything is fine here. and there are no problems. there is no issue. i think there is no issue. just they have to take proper care of them themselves by wearing masks and by maintaining some social distancing protocols. the crowds are so large it's hard to enforce coronavirus restrictions. translation: as you can see, we are urging people _ to wear their masks. and until yesterday there were a lot of fines. but because of the crowd today, we're not able to impose fines as it is not practically possible. health experts had appealed for the festival to be cancelled, but the government went ahead. we must recognize that packing together a large number of people, even in an outdoor situation, is likely to be an invitation for the virus to spread more easily. less than 4% of the population has been vaccinated. prime minister narendra modi wants to see these efforts ramped up. but there are reports of vaccine shortages even with the largest manufacturer in the world, the serum institute of india, directing most of its supply for domestic use. that will have a knock on effect for global vaccination efforts, too, because less doses will be sent overseas. global cases have been rising for seven weeks, and the world health organization has warned countries against relaxing restrictions too soon. the trajectory of the pandemic, right now it is growing exponentially. this is not the situation we want to be in 16 months into a pandemic. the japanese government has approved a plan dotted from the stricken fukushima nuclear plant which suffered a meltdown ten years ago. china has called the decision extremely responsible and south korea has expressed strong regret. announcing the planjapan plasma prime minister said safety was always the paramount concern. shifter always the paramount concern. after constructing — always the paramount concern. after constructing the _ always the paramount concern. after constructing the relevant facilities on the _ constructing the relevant facilities on the arrangements to conform to regulations— on the arrangements to conform to regulations we will start the release _ regulations we will start the release in about two years. the concentration will be reduced to one 40th of— concentration will be reduced to one 40th of domestic regulation standards which is one seventh of drinking _ standards which is one seventh of drinking water standards defined by the wh0~ _ drinking water standards defined by the who. we take it seriously that people _ the who. we take it seriously that people in— the who. we take it seriously that people in the region hit by the disaster— people in the region hit by the disaster and people in the region hit by the disasterand in people in the region hit by the disaster and in the fishing industry have concerns about damages caused try have concerns about damages caused by harmful— have concerns about damages caused by harmful rumours. the government as a whole _ by harmful rumours. the government as a whole will dispel concerns and -ive as a whole will dispel concerns and give further explanations. and let's go now to minneapolis — where the defense is expected to begin calling its first witnesses in the derek show—vin trial. mr chauvin faces charges of manslaughter, second degree murder and third degree murder in the death of george floyd last may. he's pleaded not guilty. just to let you know... there may be graphic video or details in the evidence which people may find distressing and over which we have no control. you can be seated. obviously at this point in the trial the court is being shown something on video which obviously we can't see and we can show to you. hence the pose there as they were watching and listening to whatever footage was being shown. can you give your first and last name? ~ , ., , can you give your first and last name? g . , ., name? my name is scott crayton. members of— name? my name is scott crayton. members of the _ name? my name is scott crayton. members of the jury _ name? my name is scott crayton. members of the jury you - name? my name is scott crayton. members of the jury you are - name? my name is scott crayton. | members of the jury you are about name? my name is scott crayton. . members of the jury you are about to hear evidence of an appearance involving george floyd on may six, 2019. this evidence is being admitted solely for the limited purpose of showing the ingestion of opioids he may or may not have had in the physical well of george floyd. this evidence is not to be used as evidence of the character of george floyd. br; used as evidence of the character of george floyd-— george floyd. by whom are you currently employed? _ george floyd. by whom are you currently employed? is - george floyd. by whom are you currently employed? is there i george floyd. by whom are you - currently employed? is there anyway i can hear it — currently employed? is there anyway i can hear it a — currently employed? is there anyway i can hear it a bit _ currently employed? is there anyway i can hear it a bit louder? _ currently employed? is there anyway i can hear it a bit louder? sorry- i can hear it a bit louder? sorry about— i can hear it a bit louder? sorry about that _ i can hear it a bit louder? sorry about that. ijust want to make sure hear the _ about that. ijust want to make sure hear the questions. is that better? yes _ hear the questions. is that better? yes by— hear the questions. is that better? yes. by whom are you currently employed?— yes. by whom are you currently emlo ed? ., ., . , employed? right now i am currently retired and not _ employed? right now i am currently retired and not employed _ employed? right now i am currently retired and not employed by - employed? right now i am currently i retired and not employed by anybody. prior to _ retired and not employed by anybody. prior to your _ retired and not employed by anybody. prior to your retirement, by whom were you employed? the prior to your retirement, by whom were you employed?— were you employed? the city of minneapolis _ were you employed? the city of minneapolis police _ were you employed? the city of minneapolis police to _ were you employed? the city of minneapolis police to -- - were you employed? the city of - minneapolis police to -- department. minneapolis police to —— department. how long _ minneapolis police to —— department. how long did you work there? 28 years. how long did you work there? years. can how long did you work there? 23 years. can you describe generally the various roles that you had for the various roles that you had for the minneapolis department? i started in 1993. i started on the started in1993. i started on the street— started in 1993. i started on the street working as a responder. i did six years— street working as a responder. i did six years as — street working as a responder. i did six years as a — street working as a responder. i did six years as a 911 responder and then— six years as a 911 responder and then transferred to public housing for nine _ then transferred to public housing for nine months as public housing officer~ _ for nine months as public housing officer. from there i went to the fourth _ officer. from there i went to the fourth precinct and became a community response team member involved _ community response team member involved at— community response team member involved at a street level narcotics investigator and they did that the 22 years — investigator and they did that the 22 ears. ~ , ., ., , investigator and they did that the 22 ears. ~ i. ., , ., 22 years. were you on duty on the sixth of 2019? — 22 years. were you on duty on the sixth of 2019? yes. _ 22 years. were you on duty on the sixth of 2019? yes. did _ 22 years. were you on duty on the sixth of 2019? yes. did you - 22 years. were you on duty on the sixth of 2019? yes. did you have i 22 years. were you on duty on the. sixth of 2019? yes. did you have an opportunity to review various police reports from an incident on that day? reports from an incident on that da ? , on reports from an incident on that day?- on that _ reports from an incident on that day? yes. on that day at approximately _ day? yes. on that day at approximately 5pm - day? yes. on that day at approximately 5pm did i day? yes. on that day at approximately 5pm did you execute the traffic stop of a red ford explorer? yes. and did you approach the passenger side? yes i did. can you describe very briefly the initial interaction you had with the passenger of that vehicle? i approached the vehicle on the passenger side and the passenger window— passenger side and the passenger window was down. i started giving the individual that was in the passenger seat commands. the passenger seat commands. the passenger was unresponsive and noncompliant to my commands. i then had to— noncompliant to my commands. i then had to physically reaching because i wanted _ had to physically reaching because i wanted to— had to physically reaching because i wanted to see his hands, i reached in and _ wanted to see his hands, i reached in and grabbed his hand and put it on the _ in and grabbed his hand and put it on the dash and that individual was taken _ on the dash and that individual was taken from — on the dash and that individual was taken from the vehicle and handcuffed.— taken from the vehicle and handcuffed. , ., , handcuffed. did you make any observations _ handcuffed. did you make any observations as _ handcuffed. did you make any observations as to _ handcuffed. did you make any observations as to the - handcuffed. did you make any - observations as to the passenger's behaviour? . , . behaviour? yes. in my mind his behaviour— behaviour? yes. in my mind his behaviour was _ behaviour? yes. in my mind his behaviour was very _ behaviour? yes. in my mind his behaviour was very nervous, . behaviour? yes. in my mind his - behaviour was very nervous, anxious. iwill— behaviour was very nervous, anxious. i will withdraw that question. did you see the passenger to anything physically with his hands? yes. you see the passenger to anything physically with his hands?- physically with his hands? yes, he turned away _ physically with his hands? yes, he turned away from _ physically with his hands? yes, he turned away from me _ physically with his hands? yes, he turned away from me towards - physically with his hands? yes, he turned away from me towards the | turned away from me towards the drivers _ turned away from me towards the drivers seat as i was giving him command — drivers seat as i was giving him command to see his hands. did you draw our command to see his hands. did you draw your service _ command to see his hands. did you draw your service weapon? - command to see his hands. did you draw your service weapon? yes. . command to see his hands. did you| draw your service weapon? yes. did you observe the passenger put anything in his mouth? ihio. were you anything in his mouth? no. were you wearing a body worn cameras issued by the city of minneapolis? yes. have you had an opportunity to review your camera prior to today's testimony? yes. based upon the order i would move to admit and publish exhibit 1051. i would move to admit and publish exhibit 1051-— if we may publish. can you undo your seat belt, _ if we may publish. can you undo your seat belt, sir? passenger, and do your— seat belt, sir? passenger, and do your seat— seat belt, sir? passenger, and do your seat belt. go ahead and then do your seat belt. go ahead and then do your seat— your seat belt. go ahead and then do your seat belt. go ahead and then do your seat belt. take your time. relax — your seat belt. take your time. relax. just— your seat belt. take your time. relax. just undo your seat belt. just keep— relax. just undo your seat belt. just keep your hands where i can see them _ just keep your hands where i can see them hey! _ just keep your hands where i can see them. hey! keep your hands where i can see _ them. hey! keep your hands where i can see them! put them up on the dash! _ can see them! put them up on the dash! put— can see them! put them up on the dash! put them on the dash! i am not going _ dash! put them on the dash! i am not going to _ dash! put them on the dash! i am not going to shoot you. put your hands on the _ going to shoot you. put your hands on the dash! it's the last time i'm going _ on the dash! it's the last time i'm going to _ on the dash! it's the last time i'm going to tell you that. it's simple. he keeps— going to tell you that. it's simple. he keeps moving his hands around. he won't _ he keeps moving his hands around. he won't listen _ he keeps moving his hands around. he won't listen to what i have to say. ok. , y ., won't listen to what i have to say. ok. , , ., ., won't listen to what i have to say. ok. , ., ,, ., won't listen to what i have to say. ok. open your mouth, spit out what ou've ok. open your mouth, spit out what you've got- — ok. open your mouth, spit out what you've got- now _ ok. open your mouth, spit out what you've got. now slowly _ ok. open your mouth, spit out what you've got. now slowly come - ok. open your mouth, spit out what you've got. now slowly come on - ok. open your mouth, spit out what| you've got. now slowly come on out. put your _ you've got. now slowly come on out. put your hands on your head. relax. you are _ put your hands on your head. relax. you are not— put your hands on your head. relax. you are not going to get beat up on nothing _ you are not going to get beat up on nothing if— you are not going to get beat up on nothing if you just follow what we are asking — nothing if you just follow what we are asking you to do. | nothing if you just follow what we are asking you to do.— obviously there is a strong language are being used. this is video footage we have no control over so apologies if you were offended by what you heard from the american officer. let's talk to our correspondent who is outside the courtroom. can you just explain to our audience what we were just saying. our audience what we were 'ust sa inc. ~ our audience what we were 'ust sa in. ~ . our audience what we were 'ust sa in. _ . ., , ., our audience what we were 'ust sa in. . , ., 11" saying. we are seeing a 2019 the rest video of— saying. we are seeing a 2019 the rest video of george _ saying. we are seeing a 2019 the rest video of george floyd. - saying. we are seeing a 2019 the rest video of george floyd. the | rest video of george floyd. the prosecution is rested their case and this retired officer is the first witness the defence has called. the judge has warned the jury to take into account this is not to speak to george floyd's character but the defence wanted to introduce this video in trial because they want to show there is a pattern of george floyd using drugs. this is the entire case, to prove that on my 25th last year when george floyd was arrested and essentially died during that arrest that it was not because of the knee on his neck but because of the knee on his neck but because of his drug use and underlying health problems. we of his drug use and underlying health problems.— of his drug use and underlying health problems. of his drug use and underlying health roblems. ~ ., . ,, ., health problems. we will go back to the courtroom _ health problems. we will go back to the courtroom to _ health problems. we will go back to the courtroom to hear— health problems. we will go back to the courtroom to hear more - health problems. we will go back to the courtroom to hear more from i health problems. we will go back to l the courtroom to hear more from the witness. good morning. you testified that he would _ good morning. you testified that he would have — good morning. you testified that he would have the _ good morning. you testified that he would have the officer— good morning. you testified that he would have the officer who - would have the officer who approached _ would have the officer who approached the _ would have the officer who approached the passenger| would have the officer who - approached the passenger side of would have the officer who _ approached the passenger side of the vehicle _ approached the passenger side of the vehicle and _ approached the passenger side of the vehicle and approached _ approached the passenger side of the vehicle and approached george - approached the passenger side of the vehicle and approached george floyd| vehicle and approached george floyd on may— vehicle and approached george floyd on may six. — vehicle and approached george floyd on may six. 2019~ _ vehicle and approached george floyd on may six, 2019. you _ vehicle and approached george floyd on may six, 2019. you had _ vehicle and approached george floyd on may six, 2019. you had your- vehicle and approached george floyd on may six, 2019. you had your gunl on may six, 2019. you had your gun drawn— on may six, 2019. you had your gun drawn when— on may six, 2019. you had your gun drawn when you _ on may six, 2019. you had your gun drawn when you approached - on may six, 2019. you had your gun drawn when you approached mr- on may six, 2019. you had your gun . drawn when you approached mr floyd. yes. drawn when you approached mr floyd. yes and _ drawn when you approached mr floyd. yes and when — drawn when you approached mr floyd. yes and when you _ drawn when you approached mr floyd. yes. and when you approached - drawn when you approached mr floyd. yes. and when you approached mr- yes. and when you approached mr floyd _ yes. and when you approached mr floyd he _ yes. and when you approached mr floyd he said — yes. and when you approached mr floyd he said don't _ yes. and when you approached mr floyd he said don't shoot - yes. and when you approached mr floyd he said don't shoot me, - yes. and when you approached mr floyd he said don't shoot me, i- floyd he said don't shoot me, i don't _ floyd he said don't shoot me, i don't want _ floyd he said don't shoot me, i don't want to _ floyd he said don't shoot me, i don't want to get _ floyd he said don't shoot me, i don't want to get shot. - floyd he said don't shoot me, i. don't want to get shot. something like that, — don't want to get shot. something like that, yes _ don't want to get shot. something like that, yes. you _ don't want to get shot. something like that, yes. you told _ don't want to get shot. something like that, yes. you told him - don't want to get shot. something like that, yes. you told him to - don't want to get shot. something i like that, yes. you told him to undo his seat— like that, yes. you told him to undo his seat belt — like that, yes. you told him to undo his seat belt and _ like that, yes. you told him to undo his seat belt and he _ like that, yes. you told him to undo his seat belt and he did _ like that, yes. you told him to undo his seat belt and he did that. - like that, yes. you told him to undo his seat belt and he did that. yes i his seat belt and he did that. yes he did _ his seat belt and he did that. yes he did then— his seat belt and he did that. yes he did. then he _ his seat belt and he did that. yes he did. then he said _ his seat belt and he did that. yes he did. then he said put - his seat belt and he did that. yes he did. then he said put your- his seat belt and he did that. yes i he did. then he said put your hands where _ he did. then he said put your hands where i_ he did. then he said put your hands where i can— he did. then he said put your hands where i can see _ he did. then he said put your hands where i can see them. _ he did. then he said put your hands where i can see them. yes. - he did. then he said put your hands where i can see them. yes. then. he did. then he said put your hands| where i can see them. yes. then he put his— where i can see them. yes. then he put his hand — where i can see them. yes. then he put his hand in— where i can see them. yes. then he put his hand in the _ where i can see them. yes. then he put his hand in the air— where i can see them. yes. then he put his hand in the air but— where i can see them. yes. then he put his hand in the air but the - put his hand in the air but the minute — put his hand in the air but the minute you _ put his hand in the air but the minute you put— put his hand in the air but the minute you put his _ put his hand in the air but the minute you put his hands - put his hand in the air but the minute you put his hands on. put his hand in the air but the . minute you put his hands on the put his hand in the air but the - minute you put his hands on the dash you grabbed — minute you put his hands on the dash you grabbed his— minute you put his hands on the dash you grabbed his hand _ minute you put his hands on the dash you grabbed his hand and _ minute you put his hands on the dash you grabbed his hand and put - minute you put his hands on the dash you grabbed his hand and put it- minute you put his hands on the dash you grabbed his hand and put it on. you grabbed his hand and put it on the dashboard _ you grabbed his hand and put it on the dashboard of— you grabbed his hand and put it on the dashboard of the _ you grabbed his hand and put it on the dashboard of the vehicle. - you grabbed his hand and put it on the dashboard of the vehicle. yes. j the dashboard of the vehicle. yes. the other— the dashboard of the vehicle. yes. the other officer— the dashboard of the vehicle. yes. the other officer with— the dashboard of the vehicle. yes. the other officer with you - the dashboard of the vehicle. yes. the other officer with you on - the dashboard of the vehicle. yes. the other officer with you on the l the other officer with you on the other— the other officer with you on the other side — the other officer with you on the other side of— the other officer with you on the other side of the _ the other officer with you on the other side of the vehicle - the other officer with you on the | other side of the vehicle changed that to _ other side of the vehicle changed that to put — other side of the vehicle changed that to put your— other side of the vehicle changed that to put your hands _ other side of the vehicle changed that to put your hands on - other side of the vehicle changed that to put your hands on your i other side of the vehicle changed - that to put your hands on your head. then— that to put your hands on your head. then he _ that to put your hands on your head. then he put— that to put your hands on your head. then he put his _ that to put your hands on your head. then he put his hands _ that to put your hands on your head. then he put his hands on _ that to put your hands on your head. then he put his hands on his- that to put your hands on your head. then he put his hands on his head. l then he put his hands on his head. that is— then he put his hands on his head. that is correct. _ then he put his hands on his head. that is correct. there _ then he put his hands on his head. that is correct. there was - then he put his hands on his head. that is correct. there was one - that is correct. there was one officer— that is correct. there was one officer who _ that is correct. there was one officer who said _ that is correct. there was one officer who said they - that is correct. there was one officer who said they were - that is correct. there was one . officer who said they were going that is correct. there was one - officer who said they were going to tease _ officer who said they were going to tease him~ — officer who said they were going to tease him. that's— officer who said they were going to tease him. that's what _ officer who said they were going to tease him. that's what i— officer who said they were going to tease him. that's what i heard. - officer who said they were going toi tease him. that's what i heard. you were _ tease him. that's what i heard. you were yelling — tease him. that's what i heard. you were yelling pretty— tease him. that's what i heard. you were yelling pretty loud. _ tease him. that's what i heard. you were yelling pretty loud. yes. - tease him. that's what i heard. you were yelling pretty loud. yes. it - were yelling pretty loud. yes. it escalated — were yelling pretty loud. yes. it escalated real— were yelling pretty loud. yes. it escalated real quick. _ were yelling pretty loud. yes. it escalated real quick.— were yelling pretty loud. yes. it escalated real quick. some profanity as well. escalated real quick. some profanity as well- yes- — escalated real quick. some profanity as well. yes. you _ escalated real quick. some profanity as well. yes. you had _ escalated real quick. some profanity as well. yes. you had your - escalated real quick. some profanity as well. yes. you had your gun - escalated real quick. some profanityl as well. yes. you had your gun drawn every time — as well. yes. you had your gun drawn every time you _ as well. yes. you had your gun drawn every time you are — as well. yes. you had your gun drawn every time you are giving _ as well. yes. you had your gun drawn every time you are giving commands. j every time you are giving commands. once i_ every time you are giving commands. 0nce i started — every time you are giving commands. once i started ordering _ every time you are giving commands. once i started ordering him _ every time you are giving commands. once i started ordering him and - every time you are giving commands. once i started ordering him and he i once i started ordering him and he refused _ once i started ordering him and he refused to— once i started ordering him and he refused to show me as hands, it escalated — refused to show me as hands, it escalated and i pulled my gun. and he was awake- _ escalated and i pulled my gun. and he was awake. yes. he was conscious. he didn't _ he was awake. yes. he was conscious. he didn't appear— he was awake. yes. he was conscious. he didn't appearto_ he was awake. yes. he was conscious. he didn't appear to be _ he was awake. yes. he was conscious. he didn't appear to be in _ he was awake. yes. he was conscious. he didn't appear to be in medical- he didn't appear to be in medical distress — he didn't appear to be in medical distress when _ he didn't appear to be in medical distress when you _ he didn't appear to be in medical distress when you are _ he didn't appear to be in medical distress when you are pulling - he didn't appear to be in medical distress when you are pulling out he didn't appear to be in medical. distress when you are pulling out of the car _ distress when you are pulling out of the car he — distress when you are pulling out of the car he was _ distress when you are pulling out of the car. he was talking _ distress when you are pulling out of the car. he was talking to _ distress when you are pulling out of the car. he was talking to you, - distress when you are pulling out of the car. he was talking to you, he l the car. he was talking to you, he was standing _ the car. he was talking to you, he was standing up _ the car. he was talking to you, he was standing up. i— the car. he was talking to you, he was standing up.— was standing up. i don't know if, sometimes _ was standing up. i don't know if, sometimes he _ was standing up. i don't know if, sometimes he was _ was standing up. i don't know if, sometimes he was talking - was standing up. i don't know if, sometimes he was talking and i sometimes he was talking and sometimes he was talking and sometimes he was mumbling. he was incoherent— sometimes he was mumbling. he was incoherent a _ sometimes he was mumbling. he was incoherent a lot of the time in my mind _ incoherent a lot of the time in my mind. �* , ., incoherent a lot of the time in my mind. �* ., . , ., mind. but you handcuffed him and he stood next to — mind. but you handcuffed him and he stood next to the _ mind. but you handcuffed him and he stood next to the car, _ mind. but you handcuffed him and he stood next to the car, he _ mind. but you handcuffed him and he stood next to the car, he asked - mind. but you handcuffed him and he stood next to the car, he asked you l stood next to the car, he asked you not to _ stood next to the car, he asked you not to beat — stood next to the car, he asked you not to beat him _ stood next to the car, he asked you not to beat him up. _ stood next to the car, he asked you not to beat him up. that— stood next to the car, he asked you not to beat him up. that is- stood next to the car, he asked you not to beat him up. that is correct. | not to beat him up. that is correct. he was— not to beat him up. that is correct. he was able — not to beat him up. that is correct. he was able to _ not to beat him up. that is correct. he was able to walk. _ not to beat him up. that is correct. he was able to walk. he _ not to beat him up. that is correct. he was able to walk. he continued | not to beat him up. that is correct. l he was able to walk. he continued to talk to— he was able to walk. he continued to talk to you _ he was able to walk. he continued to talk to ou. . again, we see members of the courtroom listening to audio. there is thejudge courtroom listening to audio. there is the judge obviously. this is the start of the defence team presenting their arguments to the jury is. we heard yesterday from the cardiologist and the use of force expert and george floyd's brother in the trial. mr chauvin is charged with second—degree and intentional murder, third—degree murder and second—degree manslaughter in george floyd's death. as you know george floyd's death. as you know george floyd died in may last year after derek chauvin placed his knee on mr floyd's neck while he said, i can't breathe. it was those final moments recorded on video that led to so many protests against police brutality and racism right across the united states and spread as you know around the world. so today we have seen the very beginning of the defence putting forward its arguments to the jury is. we have seen some distressing video footage of an arrest that are now retired police officer made of george floyd just before a couple of days before his death. i think we can now go back to the courtroom. you were describing _ back to the courtroom. you were describing that _ back to the courtroom. you were describing that you _ back to the courtroom. you were describing that you got _ back to the courtroom. you were describing that you got mr - back to the courtroom. you were describing that you got mr floyd | back to the courtroom. you were i describing that you got mr floyd out of the _ describing that you got mr floyd out of the car _ describing that you got mr floyd out of the car yes~ _ describing that you got mr floyd out of the car. yes. he _ describing that you got mr floyd out of the car. yes. he stood _ describing that you got mr floyd out of the car. yes. he stood next- describing that you got mr floyd out of the car. yes. he stood next to . of the car. yes. he stood next to the car— of the car. yes. he stood next to the car and — of the car. yes. he stood next to the carand you— of the car. yes. he stood next to the car and you handcuffed - of the car. yes. he stood next to the car and you handcuffed him. | of the car. yes. he stood next to - the car and you handcuffed him. and he didn't— the car and you handcuffed him. and he didn't fall— the car and you handcuffed him. and he didn't fall down. _ the car and you handcuffed him. and he didn't fall down. no. _ there was another officer dealing with the driver. that is correct. and that officer was speaking or giving commands to the driver. simultaneous to the time you are giving commands to mr floyd. did you hear the officer say spit it out? i may have. hear the officer say spit it out? i may have- i _ hear the officer say spit it out? i may have. i have _ hear the officer say spit it out? i may have. i have no _ hear the officer say spit it out? i may have. i have no further - may have. i have no further questions- _ may have. i have no further questions. i— may have. i have no further questions. i want _ may have. i have no further questions. i want to - may have. i have no further questions. i want to ask - may have. i have no further i questions. i want to ask some questions _ questions. i want to ask some questions about _ questions. i want to ask some questions about what - questions. i want to ask some questions about what the - questions. i want to ask some l questions about what the other officers — questions about what the other officers were _ questions about what the other officers were doing. _ questions about what the other officers were doing. you - questions about what the other officers were doing. you are i officers were doing. you are interacting _ officers were doing. you are interacting with— officers were doing. you are interacting with mr- officers were doing. you are interacting with mr floyd - officers were doing. you are i interacting with mr floyd and officers were doing. you are - interacting with mr floyd and while you are _ interacting with mr floyd and while you are interacting _ interacting with mr floyd and while you are interacting with _ interacting with mr floyd and while you are interacting with mr- interacting with mr floyd and while you are interacting with mr floyd i interacting with mr floyd and whilel you are interacting with mr floyd he didn't— you are interacting with mr floyd he didn't collapse — you are interacting with mr floyd he didn't collapse on _ you are interacting with mr floyd he didn't collapse on the _ you are interacting with mr floyd he didn't collapse on the ground. - you are interacting with mr floyd he didn't collapse on the ground. can i didn't collapse on the ground. can ou seak didn't collapse on the ground. can you speak up _ didn't collapse on the ground. you speak up a little louder? didn't collapse on the ground. can | you speak up a little louder? when ou are you speak up a little louder? when you are interacting _ you speak up a little louder? when you are interacting with _ you speak up a little louder? when you are interacting with mr - you speak up a little louder? when you are interacting with mr floyd he didn't— you are interacting with mr floyd he didn't collapse — you are interacting with mr floyd he didn't collapse on _ you are interacting with mr floyd he didn't collapse on the _ you are interacting with mr floyd he didn't collapse on the ground. - you are interacting with mr floyd he didn't collapse on the ground. no. i didn't collapse on the ground. no. you asked some _ didn't collapse on the ground. you asked some questions about didn't collapse on the ground- you asked some questions about what the other— you asked some questions about what the other officers— you asked some questions about what the other officers were _ you asked some questions about what the other officers were doing. - you asked some questions about what the other officers were doing. your. the other officers were doing. your attention— the other officers were doing. your attention was — the other officers were doing. your attention was focused _ the other officers were doing. your attention was focused on _ the other officers were doing. your attention was focused on mr - the other officers were doing. yourj attention was focused on mr floyd. and mr— attention was focused on mr floyd. and mr floyd — attention was focused on mr floyd. and mr floyd didn't _ attention was focused on mr floyd. and mr floyd didn't drop— attention was focused on mr floyd. and mr floyd didn't drop dead - attention was focused on mr floyd. i and mr floyd didn't drop dead while you are _ and mr floyd didn't drop dead while you are interacting _ and mr floyd didn't drop dead while you are interacting with _ and mr floyd didn't drop dead while you are interacting with him. - and mr floyd didn't drop dead while you are interacting with him. no. i you are interacting with him. no. nothin: you are interacting with him. nothing further. you are interacting with him. no. nothing further. thank— you are interacting with him. no. nothing further. thank you, - you are interacting with him. no. nothing further. thank you, you | you are interacting with him. no. - nothing further. thank you, you may step down- — at this time the defence called michelle molson. do you swear or affirm that the testimony— do you swear or affirm that the testimony he are about to give is the truth — testimony he are about to give is the truth and nothing but the truth? i do. the truth and nothing but the truth? i do take _ the truth and nothing but the truth? i do take a — the truth and nothing but the truth? i do. take a seat. before we begin if you _ i do. take a seat. before we begin if you can — i do. take a seat. before we begin if you can state your full name. my first name — if you can state your full name. first name is if you can state your full name. my first name is michelle and my last name _ first name is michelle and my last name is _ first name is michelle and my last name is muston. _ first name is michelle and my last name is muston. tire _ first name is michelle and my last name is muston.— first name is michelle and my last name is muston. are you comfortable takin: off name is muston. are you comfortable taking off the — name is muston. are you comfortable taking off the mask? _ name is muston. are you comfortable taking off the mask? members - name is muston. are you comfortable taking off the mask? members of - name is muston. are you comfortable taking off the mask? members of the | taking off the mask? members of the 'ury taking off the mask? members of the jury this _ taking off the mask? members of the jury this again is regarding in incident _ jury this again is regarding in incident involving george floyd on may six. _ incident involving george floyd on may six, 2019. as i told you before this evidence is being admitted solely— this evidence is being admitted solely for the limited purpose of showing — solely for the limited purpose of showing what effect the ingestion of opioids— showing what effect the ingestion of opioids may or may not have had on the physical— opioids may or may not have had on the physical well being of george floyd~ _ the physical well being of george floyd. this evidence is not to be used _ floyd. this evidence is not to be used as— floyd. this evidence is not to be used as evidence of the character of george _ used as evidence of the character of george floyd. mr nelson. by used as evidence of the character of george floyd. mr nelson.— used as evidence of the character of george floyd. mr nelson. by whom are ou george floyd. mr nelson. by whom are you currently — george floyd. mr nelson. by whom are you currently employed? _ george floyd. mr nelson. by whom are you currently employed? i _ george floyd. mr nelson. by whom are you currently employed? i am - you currently employed? i am retired. priorto you currently employed? i am retired. prior to retirement, where were you employed? i retired. prior to retirement, where were you employed?— were you employed? i was a paramedic- _ were you employed? i was a paramedic. how— were you employed? i was a paramedic. how long - were you employed? i was a paramedic. how long were i were you employed? i was a i paramedic. how long were you were you employed? i was a - paramedic. how long were you a paramedic _ paramedic. how long were you a paramedic for? _ paramedic. how long were you a paramedic for? just _ paramedic. how long were you a paramedic for? just over - paramedic. how long were you a paramedic for? just over 34 - paramedic. how long were you a l paramedic for? just over 34 years. and can you _ paramedic for? just over 34 years. and can you describe _ paramedic for? just over 34 years. and can you describe the - paramedic for? just over 34 years. | and can you describe the education that you had to become a paramedic? i have a two year degree in emergency— i have a two year degree in emergency medical- i have a two year degree in emergency medical care i i have a two year degree in. emergency medical care and i have a two year degree in - emergency medical care and rescue and then— emergency medical care and rescue and then i_ emergency medical care and rescue and then i got— emergency medical care and rescue and then i got an _ emergency medical care and rescue and then i got an additional- and then i got an additional registered _ and then i got an additional registered nursing - and then i got an additionalj registered nursing graduate and then i got an additional- registered nursing graduate from st mary's _ registered nursing graduate from st mary's university_ registered nursing graduate from st mary's university in _ registered nursing graduate from st mary's university in 1991. _ registered nursing graduate from st mary's university in 1991. so - registered nursing graduate from st mary's university in 1991.— mary's university in 1991. so you worked as _ mary's university in 1991. so you worked as a _ mary's university in 1991. so you worked as a paramedic- mary's university in 1991. so you worked as a paramedic for- mary's university in 1991. so you worked as a paramedic for the l mary's university in 1991. so you - worked as a paramedic for the inside of your career or did you have other employment? i of your career or did you have other employment?— employment? i actually worked for ou in employment? i actually worked for you in dakota _ employment? i actually worked for you in dakota county _ employment? i actually worked for you in dakota county for— employment? i actually worked for you in dakota county for one - employment? i actually worked for you in dakota county for one year i you in dakota county for one year and i_ you in dakota county for one year and i have — you in dakota county for one year and i have worked _ you in dakota county for one year and i have worked that _ you in dakota county for one year and i have worked that ever- you in dakota county for one yeari and i have worked that ever since. you have — and i have worked that ever since. you have gone _ and i have worked that ever since. you have gone through _ and i have worked that ever since. you have gone through a - and i have worked that ever since. you have gone through a large - and i have worked that ever since. - you have gone through a large number of calls through your career. yes. and you might not remember every specific detail of every call. . as a paramedic to you maintain records about each call that you go to in order to assess the patient�*s a? yes. prior to your testimony today have you had _ prior to your testimony today have you had an — prior to your testimony today have you had an opportunity _ prior to your testimony today have you had an opportunity to - prior to your testimony today have you had an opportunity to review i prior to your testimony today have you had an opportunity to review a run sheet — you had an opportunity to review a run sheet from _ you had an opportunity to review a run sheet from may _ you had an opportunity to review a run sheet from may six _ you had an opportunity to review a run sheet from may six of - you had an opportunity to review a run sheet from may six of 2019 - run sheet from may six of 2019 involving — run sheet from may six of 2019 involving george _ run sheet from may six of 2019 involving george floyd? - run sheet from may six of 2019 involving george floyd? yes. i run sheet from may six of 2019. involving george floyd? yes. do run sheet from may six of 2019 involving george floyd? yes. do you recall all of— involving george floyd? yes. do you recall all of those _ involving george floyd? yes. do you recall all of those details _ involving george floyd? yes. do you recall all of those details of - involving george floyd? yes. do you recall all of those details of the - recall all of those details of the top of your head now? h0. in terms top of your head now? no. in terms of our top of your head now? no. in terms of your recollection of may six, 2019, where you summoned to the minneapolis police retirement? yes. to attend to — minneapolis police retirement? yes. to attend to mr _ minneapolis police retirement? yes. to attend to mr floyd? yes. upon arriving at the precinct did you talk to mr floyd? yes. did you learn information from him about what he had consumed and the timeframe he had consumed and the timeframe he had consumed and the timeframe he had consumed it in? yes. had consumed and the timeframe he had consumed it in?— had consumed it in? yes. it was uuite had consumed it in? yes. it was quite hard _ had consumed it in? yes. it was quite hard to — had consumed it in? yes. it was quite hard to assess _ had consumed it in? yes. it was quite hard to assess him. - had consumed it in? yes. it was quite hard to assess him. he i had consumed it in? yes. it wasl quite hard to assess him. he was upset _ quite hard to assess him. he was upset and — quite hard to assess him. he was upset and confused. _ quite hard to assess him. he was upset and confused. some - quite hard to assess him. he was upset and confused. some of- quite hard to assess him. he was upset and confused. some of thej upset and confused. some of the things— upset and confused. some of the things he — upset and confused. some of the things he said... _ upset and confused. some of the things he said. . ._ upset and confused. some of the things he said... were you able to learn if things he said. .. were you able to learn if mr— things he said... were you able to learn if mr floyd _ things he said... were you able to learn if mr floyd had _ things he said... were you able to learn if mr floyd had consumed i learn if mr floyd had consumed narcotics that day? yes. what did he tell you specifically about what narcotics he had taken and when he had taken them? he narcotics he had taken and when he had taken them?— narcotics he had taken and when he had taken them? he told me that he had taken them? he told me that he had been taking _ had taken them? he told me that he had been taking multiple _ had taken them? he told me that he had been taking multiple every - had taken them? he told me that he had been taking multiple every 20 i had been taking multiple every 20 minutes— had been taking multiple every 20 minutes and — had been taking multiple every 20 minutes and it _ had been taking multiple every 20 minutes and it was... _ had been taking multiple every 20 minutes and it was... i— had been taking multiple every 20 minutes and it was... i don't - minutes and it was... i don't remember _ minutes and it was... idon't remember. it— minutes and it was... i don't remember. it was _ minutes and it was... i don't remember. it was opioid - minutes and it was... i don't - remember. it was opioid —based. it wasn't _ remember. it was opioid —based. it wasn't consistent— remember. it was opioid —based. it wasn't consistent with _ remember. it was opioid —based. it wasn't consistent with his - remember. it was opioid —based. it| wasn't consistent with his behaviour at that— wasn't consistent with his behaviour at that time — he informs you he had taken some sort of opioid every 20 minutes or something like that. find sort of opioid every 20 minutes or something like that.— something like that. and then the officer came _ something like that. and then the officer came up. _ something like that. and then the officer came up. so _ something like that. and then the officer came up. so he _ something like that. and then the officer came up. so he had - something like that. and then the officer came up. so he had taken| something like that. and then the | officer came up. so he had taken a ill at the officer came up. so he had taken a pill at the time _ officer came up. so he had taken a pill at the time the _ officer came up. so he had taken a pill at the time the offices - officer came up. so he had taken a pill at the time the offices were i pill at the time the offices were apprehending him. yes. did you do a physical assessment of mr floyd at that time? yes. did you take as blood pressure?— that time? yes. did you take as blood pressure? yes. would you agree our first blood pressure? yes. would you agree your first vitals were taken at approximately 134 and 59 seconds? would it refresh your recollection to review the run sheet? yes. thank you. i have written down here that i was, 1334 was _ i have written down here that i was, 1334 was the — i have written down here that i was, 1334 was the first _ i have written down here that i was, 1334 was the first recorded - i have written down here that i was, 1334 was the first recorded vital- 1334 was the first recorded vital signs _ 1334 was the first recorded vital si . ns. , . . signs. did that refresh recollections? - signs. did that refresh recollections? yes, i signs. did that refreshj recollections? yes, do signs. did that refresh i recollections? yes, do you signs. did that refresh - recollections? yes, do you need signs. did that refresh _ recollections? yes, do you need it back? if you _ recollections? yes, do you need it back? if you want _ recollections? yes, do you need it back? if you want to _ recollections? yes, do you need it back? if you want to refresh i recollections? yes, do you need it back? if you want to refresh yourl back? if you want to refresh your memory with _ back? if you want to refresh your memory with that _ back? if you want to refresh your memory with that letter - back? if you want to refresh your memory with that letter is - back? if you want to refresh yourj memory with that letter is known back? if you want to refresh your i memory with that letter is known we will allow you to refresh your memory. psi will allow you to refresh your memory-— will allow you to refresh your memo . �* ~ ,, ., ., , memory. at approximately 1334, that's1:34pm. — memory. at approximately 1334, that's 1:34pm, agreed? - memory. at approximately 1334, that's1:34pm, agreed? utica i memory. at approximately 1334, that's1:34pm, agreed? utica isi that's1:34pm, agreed? utica is vital. _ that's1:34pm, agreed? utica is vital, correct?— that's1:34pm, agreed? utica is vital, correct?- and i that's1:34pm, agreed? utica is| vital, correct?- and that vital, correct? correct. and that would include _ vital, correct? correct. and that would include his _ vital, correct? correct. and that would include his blood - vital, correct? correct. and that| would include his blood pressure vital, correct? correct. and that i would include his blood pressure at the time? — would include his blood pressure at the time? . would include his blood pressure at the time? yes. did you record his blood pressure _ the time? yes. did you record his blood pressure at _ the time? yes. did you record his blood pressure at the time? yes, j blood pressure at the time? yes, 216/160. blood pressure at the time? yes, 216/160- did _ blood pressure at the time? yes, 216/160. did you _ blood pressure at the time? yes, 216/160. did you make _ 216/160. did you make recommendations i 216/160. did you make recommendations to l 216/160. did you make - recommendations to transport 216/160. did you make _ recommendations to transport mr floyd _ recommendations to transport mr floyd to _ recommendations to transport mr floyd to the hospital?— recommendations to transport mr floyd to the hospital? based on that and others. — floyd to the hospital? based on that and others. yes- _ floyd to the hospital? based on that and others, yes. and _ floyd to the hospital? based on that and others, yes. and ultimately, i floyd to the hospital? based on that| and others, yes. and ultimately, was he brou:ht and others, yes. and ultimately, was he brought to — and others, yes. and ultimately, was he brought to the _ and others, yes. and ultimately, was he brought to the hospital? - he brought to the hospital? eventually. i he brought to the hospital? eventually-— he brought to the hospital? eventuall . , ., �*, ., eventually. i believe that's all i have, eventually. i believe that's all i have. your _ eventually. i believe that's all i have, your honour. _ good morning. you provided treatment to george floyd on may the 62019, correct? —— made the sixth 2019. and you're concerned about his blood pressure at that time, correct? that was one of— pressure at that time, correct? that was one of the _ pressure at that time, correct? that was one of the things. _ pressure at that time, correct? that was one of the things. and - pressure at that time, correct? that was one of the things. and in - pressure at that time, correct? that was one of the things. and in the i was one of the things. and in the course of your— was one of the things. and in the course of your treatment - was one of the things. and in the course of your treatment of i was one of the things. and in the course of your treatment of him, | was one of the things. and in the i course of your treatment of him, he explained that his high blood pressure wasn't something new, right? pressure wasn't something new, riuht? . , .., right? initially, he denied medical issues but then _ right? initially, he denied medical issues but then when _ right? initially, he denied medical issues but then when i _ right? initially, he denied medical issues but then when i discovered | issues but then when i discovered his blood — issues but then when i discovered his blood pressure, _ issues but then when i discovered his blood pressure, i— issues but then when i discovered his blood pressure, i specifically. his blood pressure, i specifically asked _ his blood pressure, i specifically asked again _ his blood pressure, i specifically asked again and _ his blood pressure, i specifically asked again and he _ his blood pressure, i specifically asked again and he said, - his blood pressure, i specifically asked again and he said, yes, i his blood pressure, i specificallyl asked again and he said, yes, he his blood pressure, i specifically- asked again and he said, yes, he had asked again and he said, yes, he had a history— asked again and he said, yes, he had a history of— asked again and he said, yes, he had a history of hypertension _ asked again and he said, yes, he had a history of hypertension and - asked again and he said, yes, he had a history of hypertension and had i a history of hypertension and had not been — a history of hypertension and had not been taking _ a history of hypertension and had not been taking his _ a history of hypertension and had not been taking his medication. i a history of hypertension and had i not been taking his medication. find not been taking his medication. and he said he not been taking his medication. he said he hadn't been taking his blood pressure medication for months, correct?— blood pressure medication for| months, correct?- and blood pressure medication for i months, correct?- and he months, correct? correct. and he told ou months, correct? correct. and he told you he _ months, correct? correct. and he told you he swallowed _ months, correct? correct. and he told you he swallowed some i months, correct? correct. and he| told you he swallowed some pills, right? told you he swallowed some pills, riuht? . told you he swallowed some pills, right? yes. approximately seven percocet, correct? _ right? yes. approximately seven percocet, correct? i— right? yes. approximately seven i percocet, correct? i documented... yes, percocet, correct? i documented... yes. seven — percocet, correct? i documented... yes. seven to _ percocet, correct? i documented... yes, seven to nine _ percocet, correct? i documented... yes, seven to nine every _ percocet, correct? i documented... yes, seven to nine every 20 - percocet, correct? i documented... | yes, seven to nine every 20 minutes or so— yes, seven to nine every 20 minutes or so for— yes, seven to nine every 20 minutes or so for a _ yes, seven to nine every 20 minutes or so for a while _ yes, seven to nine every 20 minutes or so for a while. find _ yes, seven to nine every 20 minutes or so for a while.— or so for a while. and percocet is a brand name. _ or so for a while. and percocet is a brand name, right? _ or so for a while. and percocet is a brand name, right? yes. _ or so for a while. and percocet is a brand name, right? yes. that's i brand name, right? yes. that's oxycodone _ brand name, right? yes. that's oxycodone and _ brand name, right? yes. that's oxycodone and acetaminophen? brand name, right? yes. that's i oxycodone and acetaminophen? yes. and it is used — oxycodone and acetaminophen? yes. and it is used to _ oxycodone and acetaminophen? yes. and it is used to treat _ oxycodone and acetaminophen? yes. and it is used to treat pain and you testify— and it is used to treat pain and you testify that — and it is used to treat pain and you testify that it's— and it is used to treat pain and you testify that it's an _ and it is used to treat pain and you testify that it's an opioid? - and it is used to treat pain and you testify that it's an opioid? so - and it is used to treat pain and you testify that it's an opioid?- testify that it's an opioid? so he told ou testify that it's an opioid? so he told you he _ testify that it's an opioid? so he told you he had _ testify that it's an opioid? so he told you he had been _ testify that it's an opioid? so he told you he had been taking i testify that it's an opioid? so he i told you he had been taking those pills throughout the day, right? yes, and i asked him why and he said he was _ yes, and i asked him why and he said he was addicted. _ yes, and i asked him why and he said he was addicted. he _ yes, and i asked him why and he said he was addicted.— he was addicted. he told you he was addicted and — he was addicted. he told you he was addicted and responded _ he was addicted. he told you he was addicted and responded to _ he was addicted. he told you he was addicted and responded to your- addicted and responded to your questions about taking the pills, correct? ., . questions about taking the pills, correct?- and _ questions about taking the pills, correct?- and he - questions about taking the pills, correct?- and he was i questions about taking the pills, i correct?- and he was able to correct? correct. and he was able to walk, correct? correct. and he was able to walk. correct? _ correct? correct. and he was able to walk, correct? yes. _ correct? correct. and he was able to walk, correct? yes. he _ correct? correct. and he was able to walk, correct? yes. he was- correct? correct. and he was able to walk, correct? yes. he was able i correct? correct. and he was able to walk, correct? yes. he was able to i walk, correct? yes. he was able to stand up? — walk, correct? yes. he was able to stand up? and _ walk, correct? yes. he was able to stand up? and you _ walk, correct? yes. he was able to stand up? and you wanted him to go to the hospital, right?— stand up? and you wanted him to go to the hospital, right?- and i to the hospital, right? correct. and he didn't feel _ to the hospital, right? correct. and he didn't feel he _ to the hospital, right? correct. and he didn't feel he wanted _ to the hospital, right? correct. and he didn't feel he wanted to - to the hospital, right? correct. and he didn't feel he wanted to go - to the hospital, right? correct. and he didn't feel he wanted to go to i he didn't feel he wanted to go to the hospital, correct? he was resistant going to the hospital, right? i resistant going to the hospital, riuht? ~' ., resistant going to the hospital, riuht? ~ ., .,, resistant going to the hospital, riuht? ~ ., ,,., resistant going to the hospital, riuht? ~ ., ., right? i know he was resistant to net on right? i know he was resistant to get on our _ right? i know he was resistant to get on our bed. _ right? i know he was resistant to get on our bed, he _ right? i know he was resistant to get on our bed, he was... - right? i know he was resistant to get on our bed, he was... it - right? i know he was resistant to get on our bed, he was... it was| get on our bed, he was... it was hard _ get on our bed, he was... it was hard to— get on our bed, he was... it was hard to tell_ get on our bed, he was... it was hard to tell exactly _ get on our bed, he was... it was hard to tell exactly what - get on our bed, he was... it was hard to tell exactly what he - get on our bed, he was... it was hard to tell exactly what he was| hard to tell exactly what he was upset _ hard to tell exactly what he was upset about _ hard to tell exactly what he was upset about. l'mu _ hard to tell exactly what he was upset about-— hard to tell exactly what he was upset about. hard to tell exactly what he was u set about. �* ., ., .,, . ., upset about. i'm going to ob'ect at this oint upset about. i'm going to ob'ect at this pointjust i upset about. i'm going to ob'ect at this point just with i upset about. i'm going to ob'ect at this point just with respect _ upset about. i'm going to object at this pointjust with respect of- this pointjust with respect of going to the hospital, your honour. he didn't want to go to the hospital, right?— he didn't want to go to the hospital, right?- it - he didn't want to go to the hospital, right? yes. it took some time to convince _ hospital, right? yes. it took some time to convince him to go to the hospital, correct?— time to convince him to go to the hospital, correct? yes. and you indicated he _ hospital, correct? yes. and you indicated he told _ hospital, correct? yes. and you indicated he told you _ hospital, correct? yes. and you indicated he told you he had been addicted to opioids, correct? and he had been addicted to opioids at that point for a year right? but he didn't feel like you need to go to the hospital. he didn't feel like you need to go to the hosnital-— didn't feel like you need to go to the hospital. he didn't want to go at that point- _ the hospital. he didn't want to go at that point. and _ the hospital. he didn't want to go at that point. and you _ the hospital. he didn't want to go at that point. and you were - the hospital. he didn't want to go i at that point. and you were referred to our at that point. and you were referred to your report. _ at that point. and you were referred to your report, the _ at that point. and you were referred to your report, the record _ at that point. and you were referred to your report, the record you - at that point. and you were referred to your report, the record you keep| to your report, the record you keep in terms of patience of treatment, you see that up there, correct? and according to your report, you documented that mr floyd was alert, correct? . documented that mr floyd was alert, correct? yes. and that he obeyed commands. _ correct? yes. and that he obeyed commands, correct? eventually. | commands, correct? eventually. that's what's _ commands, correct? eventually. that's what's in _ commands, correct? eventually. that's what's in your _ commands, correct? eventually. that's what's in your report, - that's what's in your report, correct?— that's what's in your report, correct?- and - that's what's in your report, correct?- and he - that's what's in your report, | correct?- and he had that's what's in your report, - correct?- and he had an correct? correct. and he had an appmpriate _ correct? correct. and he had an appropriate response _ correct? correct. and he had an appropriate response to - correct? correct. and he had an - appropriate response to stimulation? correct. he appropriate response to stimulation? correct. .. . �* appropriate response to stimulation? correct. �* ., . appropriate response to stimulation? correct. ., . ., correct. he wasn't notice or vomiting — correct. he wasn't notice or vomiting when _ correct. he wasn't notice or vomiting when you - correct. he wasn't notice or vomiting when you were - correct. he wasn't notice or- vomiting when you were treating correct. he wasn't notice or— vomiting when you were treating him, right? vomiting when you were treating him, riuht? ., vomiting when you were treating him, right? mo. is a respiratory rate was right? no. is a respiratory rate was normal? it — right? no. is a respiratory rate was normal? it was _ right? no. is a respiratory rate was normal? it was elevated _ right? no. is a respiratory rate was normal? it was elevated at - right? no. is a respiratory rate was normal? it was elevated at times. | normal? it was elevated at times. each ban normal? it was elevated at times. each bag you _ normal? it was elevated at times. each bag you wrote _ normal? it was elevated at times. each bag you wrote respiratory . normal? it was elevated at times. | each bag you wrote respiratory rate normal _ each bag you wrote respiratory rate normal in _ each bag you wrote respiratory rate normal in your— each bag you wrote respiratory rate normal in your report? _ each bag you wrote respiratory rate normal in your report? it _ each bag you wrote respiratory rate normal in your report? it was - normal in your report? it was initially— normal in your report? it was initially normal, _ normal in your report? it was initially normal, but - normal in your report? it was| initially normal, but increased normal in your report? it was i initially normal, but increased at times _ initially normal, but increased at times. ., ., ,, ., ., , times. you wrote respiratory effort normal, correct? _ times. you wrote respiratory effort normal, correct? correct. - times. you wrote respiratory effort normal, correct? correct. at - times. you wrote respiratory effort normal, correct? correct. at 1334,| normal, correct? correct. at 1334, 1409. . . normal, correct? correct. at 1334, 1409- - - at — normal, correct? correct. at 1334, 1409... at 1426, _ normal, correct? correct. at 1334, 1409... at 1426, all— normal, correct? correct. at 1334, 1409... at 1426, all those - normal, correct? correct. at 1334, 1409... at 1426, all those notes, | 11109... at 11126, all those notes, you indicated his respiratory effort was normal, correct?— you indicated his respiratory effort was normal, correct?- he| you indicated his respiratory effort . was normal, correct?- he was was normal, correct? correct. he was not in respiratory — was normal, correct? correct. he was not in respiratory distress, _ was normal, correct? correct. he was not in respiratory distress, his - not in respiratory distress, his blood oxygen was normal, right? correct his pulse and heart rate were _ correct his pulse and heart rate were regular— correct his pulse and heart rate were regular or— correct his pulse and heart rate were regular or normal? - were regular or normal? correct _ were regular or normal? correct his— were regular or normal? correct. his ekg - were regular or normal? correct. his ekg rhythm| were regular or normal? - correct. his ekg rhythm was were regular or normal? _ correct. his ekg rhythm was normal and his sinus rhythm on the rhythm of a normal healthy heart, was normal, correct?— of a normal healthy heart, was i normal, correct?- you're normal, correct? correct. you're worried about _ normal, correct? correct. you're worried about the _ normal, correct? correct. you're worried about the possible - normal, correct? correct. you're worried about the possible givel normal, correct? correct. you're| worried about the possible give a stroke among other things? among other things- _ stroke among other things? among other things. but _ stroke among other things? among other things. but he _ stroke among other things? among other things. but he didn't - stroke among other things? among other things. but he didn't have - stroke among other things? among other things. but he didn't have a i other things. but he didn't have a stroke _ other things. but he didn't have a stroke while — other things. but he didn't have a stroke while you _ other things. but he didn't have a stroke while you were _ other things. but he didn't have a stroke while you were with - other things. but he didn't have a stroke while you were with him? i stroke while you were with him? no. stroke while you were with him? no he _ stroke while you were with him? no he was _ stroke while you were with him? no. he was never— stroke while you were with him? no. he was never given- stroke while you were with him? no. he was never given narcan? stroke while you were with him? . no. he was never given narcan? he didn't stop breathing and his heart didn't stop breathing and his heart didn't stop? no. he didn't go into cardiac arrest or a,? no. - didn't stop? no. he didn't go into cardiac arrest or a,? no. are - didn't stop? no. he didn't go into cardiac arrest or a,? no. are new didn't stop? no. he didn't go into i cardiac arrest or a,? no. are new to come to the — cardiac arrest or a,? no. are new to come to the hospital, correct, and he was managerfor two hours come to the hospital, correct, and he was manager for two hours and released after? i he was manager for two hours and released after?— he was manager for two hours and released after? i don't know. -- you took him to — released after? i don't know. -- you took him to hospital _ released after? i don't know. -- you took him to hospital and _ released after? i don't know. -- you took him to hospital and he - released after? i don't know. -- you took him to hospital and he was - took him to hospital and he was monitored — took him to hospital and he was monitored for— took him to hospital and he was monitored for two _ took him to hospital and he was monitored for two hours. - we are going to take a five minute break, which means it will probably be ten, but let's go with five minutes for now. we will leave the trial there of derek chauvin, that's taking a pause, as you are just hearing, and we were hearing there from a paramedic, michelle moseng, a retired paramedic who worked at a local hospital and before that, the defence had called a retired police officer about a previous arrest of george floyd. we will be back with that trial in minnesota just as soon as it resumes in a few minutes' time. in the meantime, let's talk about the pandemic and vaccination programme here in the uk. if you're over 115 and in england you can now book your covid jab, as the vaccination programme enters its next phase. everyone over fifty or in a high risk group has now been offered a first dose, according to the government. ministers say they're on track to offer all adults a vaccine by the end ofjuly. it comes as officals try to contain new cases of the south african variant in south london, where hundreds of thousands of residents have been asked to come forward for tests. the prime minister has warned infections will rise as the economy reopens, and he's urged people to continue to be cautious. jim reed reports. another major milestone for the vaccination programme. all over 50s and those in high—risk groups in the uk have now been offered that first dose. at this vaccination centre in reading, they will now be inviting the next age group down. it's great that we've managed to achieve the target of getting everybody in the one to nine groups vaccinated by the deadline, a little bit ahead, actually. and we are now going to the 115—49 group, they are being asked to come forward. all those aged 115 and up can now use the nhs website to book appointments. the site appeared to crash this morning as thousands more tried to get a slot, though it is now back up and running. overall, more than 32 million people have had at least one jab of the astrazeneca and pfizer vaccines. going forward, though, the nhs will have to give a shot to all those coming back for a second booster dose, while at the same time trying to keep first doses going for those younger age groups. are you feeling well today? yeah, i'm feeling fine. today the first jabs using a third vaccine, made by the american firm moderna, are being given in england following a roll—out in wales and scotland. the supply forecast gives us confidence that assuming those supplies carry on as expected, then yes, we will not only deliver on the april 15th milestone of everybody aged 50 and above having had the chance for a vaccine, but all adults by the end ofjuly. all this comes at an important time in this pandemic. pub gardens and shops in england are now open for the first time this year. the successful vaccine roll—out has helped drive down infections and deaths. but scientists say the public still needs to follow the rules to avoid another wave of infections. the vaccines are only one part of the solution to the problem. people do need to continue to be careful and to avoid infecting each other. you can have this infection without realising it and so there is a risk. there are now all these tests available that people can obtain to test themselves and people should use those and i, certainly, for one, am going to continue to take a lot of care. and today another reminder of how easily this virus can spread. every resident of two london boroughs, wandsworth and lambeth, is being asked to take a pcr covid test. that is after a large cluster of infections caused by a variant of the virus first found in south africa. we have an outbreak _ that we are aware of in a local care home but we also know there has been some spread to the wider community. and we've been testing and tracing contacts from that outbreak. - but what we want to do now is check there is no further spread _ across our boroughs, _ both in lambeth and wandsworth. lambeth council says it is fairly confident it has the outbreak under control, but all those living in the boroughs, plus anyone who travels through, have been told they should get tested to reduce the chance of it spreading. jim reed reporting there. scotland's first minister, nicola sturgeon, has brought forward the easing of some covid restrictions ten days earlier than expected. she also said the limits on how many people can meet outdoors will increase to six adults from six households. our correspondent lorna gordon says nicola sturgeon's announcement will be welcomed by many. some big, significant changes coming earlier than expected and it's all to do with that stay local restriction here in scotland that was meant to stay in place until april 26th, so that's a little under two weeks' time, it would have been a week on monday it was lifted, but nicola sturgeon today announcing that because the data, the number of cases, is all moving in the right direction, the case numbers are falling and falling quite fast and quite dramatically, in part because of that vaccination programme, she says they're bringing forward, accelerating the route map out of lockdown and that the stay local restriction will be lifted on friday. at that point, family and friends can travel across scotland for recreation, to see each other, as long as they stay outside. one other key change that comes in on friday, the four people from two different households that are allowed to meet up outdoors will change to six people from six households being allowed to meet outdoors, and that of course doesn't include children under 12, they are in addition to any limited group numbers that are meeting. but the stay local restriction is being lifted on friday, a lot of people will be very pleased to hear that they can meet family and friends who live outside of their council area again. the prime minister has insisted the review he's ordered into the collapsed finance firm that david cameron lobbied for, greensill capital, will be given free reign. but labour says the scope of the investigation is inadequate. it wants a full parliamentary inquiry into what it calls the "rampant cronyism" in government. helen catt reports. how did former prime minister david cameron use his contacts in westminster, and did his employer lex greensill benefit from his efforts? the government is holding a review of schemes the company was involved in, headed by a lawyer. i would like it to be done quickly, but i want him to have the maximum possible access and so we can all understand exactly what happened and that will of course be presented to parliament in due course. in parliament, there are lots of questions already for the health secretary, who went for a drink with mr cameron and mr greensill after the finance firm had proposed using an app it had devised in the nhs. absolutely, i attended a social meeting organised by the former prime minister. and given that departmental business came up, i reported it to officials in the normal way. labour accused the government of a pattern of behaviour. it is cronyism and it stinks. so if he thinks he has done nothing wrong and has nothing to hide, - will he publish all of the minutes, all the e—mails, all— the correspondence, _ all the directions he gave to civil servants and all his text messages with david cameron so we can- see exactly what went on with the awarding i of his contract? there are questions for the business secretary, too. last year greensill was chosen to give loans to other companies, like the owners of liberty steel, as part of a government scheme to help businesses through the pandemic. the british business bank, which ran it, said it wasn't lobbied by mr cameron. the business secretary was asked if he had been. presumably mr cameron didn't lobby you, ministers or officials in the department in...? i have never received a single phone call or whatsapp from mr cameron. lobbying is a usual part of politics, and david cameron says he didn't break any rules, although he said there were lessons to be learned. labour says the review isn't enough. tomorrow it will force a vote to try to get mps to run their own investigation. borisjohnson has boris johnson has been borisjohnson has been talking about the review that downing street have instigated and said that the lawyer who is leading that investigation will have carte blanche to find out what happened. lets talk more about this with our political correspondent. borisjohnson is pretty clear this will be a thorough review or investigation or whatever you want to call it?— you want to call it? yes, he is. he sa s that you want to call it? yes, he is. he says that the _ you want to call it? yes, he is. he says that the review _ you want to call it? yes, he is. he says that the review will _ you want to call it? yes, he is. he says that the review will have - you want to call it? yes, he is. he| says that the review will have carte blanche to question anyone and look into anything. the issue here, i think, that the opposition have, the labour party have is what the scope of the enquiry will be. boris johnson was talking about it having this free reign to look into the issue of supply chain finance, which issue of supply chain finance, which is a very specific thing. this is about how the government pays businesses it deals with and the particular issue here was the nhs and pharmacists and greensill capital stepping in to try to speed up capital stepping in to try to speed up the payments of that and taking a cut from it. the broader issue that labour once looked at is the whole role of david cameron and lobbying more broadly, but i have particularly, on behalf of greensill capital, this finance firm. —— david cameron particularly. and his lobbying, his efforts, to press the government to give greensill capital access to covid financing funds that the government has. that's a separate thing from this payments system. so of course, labour is saying it should be broader. but it is worth saying, too, that we have in the last few minutes had another sort of angle on this story, a new development has emerged which is that this was a former senior civil servant, he was in charge of government procurement, and he left, after he left government, moved to work for greensill capital. this is emerged from the advisory committee on business appointments, the committee that if you are a former civil servant, minister, you apply to them, you let them know when you're moving to an appointment. they had been probing into this move of the civil servant to greensill capital and they have unearthed that he was actually allowed to start advising tinsel capital while he was still in the government, and that advisory role appears to have been approved by the cabinet office. so this committee is saying there are serious questions to be asked about that, they are probing further. so this just adds to the revelations that have been opening up, the more people have been looking into these issues around greensill finance. the bi . . er issues around greensill finance. the bigger picture, though, is whether this sort of lobbying by former prime ministers, former ministers, frankly should be allowed. and the irony of course is that david cameron a few years ago talked about this and said, you know, he didn't like it, didn't like the system of ex ministers doing this kind of work. .. ex ministers doing this kind of work. ., , . ., work. he did, and he predicted that lobb in: work. he did, and he predicted that lobbying would _ work. he did, and he predicted that lobbying would be _ work. he did, and he predicted that lobbying would be the _ work. he did, and he predicted that lobbying would be the next - work. he did, and he predicted that lobbying would be the next big - lobbying would be the next big scandal. this was, i think, lobbying would be the next big scandal. this was, ithink, before he became prime minister, and he was talking about the need to deal with it so watson say now is that this just shows what can happen when you get into office. —— what some are saying now. the links between officeholders and businesses and the movement between the two all need to be looked at. that is, i think, what lies behind labour calling for a broader investigation, they are going to push for, time to get a parliamentary committee set up with a vote in parliament and to try and press that. but also what i think they want to push is notjust a question about former prime ministers and ministers, but also the behaviour of current ministers, because of course, david cameron was picking up the phone and sending text messages but he was being answered by the chancellor, rishi sunak, the health secretary matt hancock, the health secretary today said he did nothing wrong, the chancellor and the treasury have set the proper procedures were followed, but what labour say is that greensill was given, or the company was given some ten meetings at the treasury after david cameron press them to try to find ways to help the firm. meanwhile, many other companies that had been struggling through the pandemic were not given such access. so the questions will be, they want to ask and want to see answered, are around the ministers who responded, rishi sunak saying he was urging the treasury to see what they could do to help, and matt hancock, who had a private meeting with mr greensill but he says he then reported that meeting and the proper procedures were followed. many thanks indeed. trade between the uk and the eu partially recovered in february, after a steep drop following brexit. separate data also suggests the economy grew that month as dharshini david explains. we saw the biggest changes in our trading arrangements in over 110 years and, yes, that has prompted some very big numbers. and as you say, to start the year we saw a big slump injanuary in the sales of goods to europe and that prompted fears that perhaps we saw traders overwhelmed by the extra paperwork and checks they had to go through. but when we got to february's figures it was a different story. we saw a 46.6% rise in exports to the eu, which confirmed what some companies had already told us, that they were simply staying away from the borders because they were concerned about disruption and delays injanuary and they had shipped goods ahead of time to try and avoid that. now they are back trading once again and other firms are getting to grips with the new changes. but having said all of that, if you look at the level of exports they are still well below where they were for much of 2020. there are two things going on there, there is of course the pandemic and that is dampening demand amongst a lot of our competitors out there, but there is also the case that many exporters, particularly when it comes to areas like fresh food, are still struggling with the volume of new formalities they have to go through and they are urging more help from the government. they say without that, not just profits, butjobs could suffer. an east london man who called himself the masked menace has been jailed for life for plotting a terror attack during the coronavirus pandemic. a supporter of the so—called islamic state group, sahayb abu bought an 18—inch sword, a knife, balaclavas and body armour online. the 27—year—old from dagenham was arrested on the ninthjuly after discussing guns with an undercover police officer. he will serve a minimum of 19 years after being found guilty in march of preparing an act of terrorism. around a million students in england are expected to find out when they'll be allowed to resume in—person teaching. it's expected that they may have to wait another month until 17th may to return to campus accommodation and lessons. universities uk has written to the government asking for that date to be brought forward. our education correspondent elaine dunkley reports. the impact of the pandemic on student life has been far—reaching. nearly a million students in england are still waiting for guidance from the government on when they can return to in—person lectures and accommodation. the road map out of lockdown has left some students feeling lost. we are not overly sure what's going on, it's a bit unsettling. the university are trying to adapt to that as well, the uncertainty of what is going to happen. that has made us feel a little bit on edge, and, i don't know... a little bit nervous. i wish they would just give us some certainty, even if it was bad news, just something to know where we are going. students on practical courses including science and creative arts were allowed to return to campuses in march. throughout the pandemic, those studying courses such as medicine, dentistry and social work have been able to continue at university. but there is concern that many students have been left in limbo. the pandemic has had its greatest effect on mental health in young people. and that population includes students, and i genuinely believe it is in the very best interests of our students for them to be back on campus so that we can give them the support they need and they've also got their peer support, and i can't stress how important that peer support is. this is what the government is keen to avoid, a repeat of the spike in cases that followed the mass migration of students last september. universities are keen to reassure that they are covid safe. we have our own testing centre, where students get tested twice a week so we can be sure we are controlling any infection if it were to arise. we have social distancing in the lecture rooms and we have changed all the ventilation arrangements in the lecture rooms so they are fully ventilated to the outside. in england, the government promised a review at easter but many students are still none the wiser about when they can return to university life. elaine dunkley, bbc news. church leaders have appealed for politicians to provide a unified response to what they call "heartbreaking" scenes of violence in northern ireland. almost 90 police officers have been injured in rioting in the past week — although recent nights have been quiet. the appeal was made to northern ireland ministers, the british and irish governments, and the european union. earlier in the commons, the northern ireland secretary, brandon lewis, said there's still work to do to ease tensions. northern ireland has made huge strides over the last two decades, but it is a post—conflict society and there do remain elements of fragility. some sections of the community feel their concerns are not understood. the reconciliation, equality and mutual understanding between the communities and traditions envisaged in the belfast good friday agreement is not recognised or experienced by all. there is still work to do. the shadow northern ireland secretary, louise haigh, critisised the prime minister and said the instability was caused by a loss of trust. the prime minister made promises to the people of northern ireland that there would be no border with great britain, knowing full well his brexit deal would introduce barriers across the irish sea. he made those promises because he knew economic separation would be unacceptable to the unionist community, and the growing political instability we are seeing has its roots in the loss of trust this caused. trust matters. it is what secured and has always sustained the belfast good friday agreement. in moments of instability, what sirjohn major and tony blair, what mo mowlam and the right honourable member for skipton and ripon understood, labour and conservative, is that trust, leadership and partnership are paramount to finding a way forward in northern ireland. chris page is in belfast for us. and politicians are having their say in the commons, what's happening in belfast itself on the streets? weill. belfast itself on the streets? well, after a week _ belfast itself on the streets? well, after a week of _ belfast itself on the streets? well, after a week of street _ belfast itself on the streets? well, after a week of street violence - belfast itself on the streets? well, after a week of street violence in i after a week of street violence in various parts of northern ireland and several towns and cities, the last three nights have been totally quiet. the lull in violence really is down to a number of factors. loyalist groups have called off street protests against, for example, the brexit arrangements for northern ireland because of the death of prince philip, they say that it's not appropriate for demonstrations to be held during the period of mourning so they have appealed for people not to take to the streets in protest. also, i don't think you can underestimate this, the likes of youth workers, church leaders, community activists have been on the ground at the places where there was trouble last week to try to steer any young people who are turning up, perhaps looking to cause trouble, away from those areas, to try to keep a sense of calm. and there has been a lot of work going on on the ground quietly, away from the cameras but nonetheless very effective and very important, to try to quell the unrest in the areas where there was rioting. so now the attention very much turns, as we had in the commons, to the underlying causes, if you like, the politics of the situation. you have unionist politicians and nationalist and cross community parties criticising the government, i suppose for different reasons, in units of the northern ireland protocol, the part of the brexit deal which has resulted in an effective trade border between northern ireland and the rest of the uk that is causing unease amongst loyalists, and also nationalists and the cross community alliance party saying the government needs to be more engaged in northern ireland, for example, there needs to be a summit convened between the british and irish governments under the auspices of a group called the british irish intergovernmental conference which was provided for the good friday agreement. the irish foreign minister simon coveney will be travelling to london to have talks about the situation in northern ireland and the situation rather northern ireland protocol, though he will not be negotiating directly about the protocol because thatis directly about the protocol because that is the european commission's job, he will be looking at some of theissues job, he will be looking at some of the issues around the process to reach agreement between the uk and eu to try to ease the way the particle is operating in the hope that if an agreement is reached on that if an agreement is reached on that between london and brussels in the next few weeks, it may go some way to defusing the tension that exists within loyalism.— way to defusing the tension that exists within loyalism. thank you very much _ exists within loyalism. thank you very much indeed. _ exists within loyalism. thank you very much indeed. we _ exists within loyalism. thank you very much indeed. we will - exists within loyalism. thank you very much indeed. we will take l exists within loyalism. thank you i very much indeed. we will take you back to minneapolis now, where the defence is holding its witnesses in the trial of derek chauvin over the death of george floyd, derek chauvin faces charges of manslaughter, second and third—degree murder in the death of george floyd last may. he has pleaded not guilty, just to let you know, there may be graphic video or details in the evidence which people may find distress in which people may find distress in which we do not have control over. today derek chauvin's defence team are laying out their case to the jury are laying out their case to the jury and calling their witnesses, and this is the third witness told by the defence, a passenger in george floyd's vehicle, let's have a listen. they tried to wake him up, i tried to wake him up. he made a little gesture. to wake him up. he made a little aesture. ~ .. . .. to wake him up. he made a little aesture. ~ ., , ., ., to wake him up. he made a little aesture. . ., ., , . ., gesture. was that a sudden change from how he _ gesture. was that a sudden change from how he observed _ gesture. was that a sudden change from how he observed him? - gesture. was that a sudden change from how he observed him? yes. l gesture. was that a sudden change | from how he observed him? yes. he was tired because _ from how he observed him? yes. he was tired because he _ from how he observed him? yes. he was tired because he had _ from how he observed him? yes. he was tired because he had been - was tired because he had been working. was tired because he had been workinu. , . ., was tired because he had beeni working._ overruled. was tired because he had been - working._ overruled. and working. ob'ection. overruled. and so at some — working. objection. overruled. and so at some point _ working. objection. overruled. and so at some point did _ working. objection. overruled. and so at some point did the _ working. objection. overruled. and so at some point did the store - working. objection. overruled. and| so at some point did the store looks leave _ so at some point did the store looks leave the _ so at some point did the store looks leave the side of the car. yes. i didn't— leave the side of the car. yes. i didn't have _ leave the side of the car. yes. i didn't have money on me. did you continue _ didn't have money on me. did you continue to— didn't have money on me. did you continue to try and rouse mr floyd? yes. did you continue to try and awaken mr floyd? — did you continue to try and awaken mr flo d? . did you continue to try and awaken mr flo d? , ., did you continue to try and awaken mrflo d? , ., , ., mr floyd? yes, i tried a couple of times. i mr floyd? yes, i tried a couple of times- i let _ mr floyd? yes, i tried a couple of times. i let it _ mr floyd? yes, i tried a couple of times. i let it go _ mr floyd? yes, i tried a couple of times. i let it go for _ mr floyd? yes, i tried a couple of times. i let it go for a _ mr floyd? yes, i tried a couple of times. i let it go for a few- mr floyd? yes, i tried a couple of| times. i let it go for a few minutes because i was back on the phone. find because i was back on the phone. and did the stalk looks come back to the card a _ did the stalk looks come back to the card a second time? no. and were you. _ card a second time? no. and were you. at— card a second time? no. and were you. at some _ card a second time? no. and were you, at some point the police officers — you, at some point the police officers approached the car. and mr floyd _ officers approached the car. and mr floyd was— officers approached the car. and mr floyd was aroused by the police? yes _ floyd was aroused by the police? yes~ i_ floyd was aroused by the police? yes i have — floyd was aroused by the police? yes. i have no further questions. ijust have a couple of follow—up questions — ijust have a couple of follow—up questions. during _ ijust have a couple of follow—up questions. during the _ ijust have a couple of follow—up questions. during the period - ijust have a couple of follow—up| questions. during the period you ijust have a couple of follow—up - questions. during the period you are with mr_ questions. during the period you are with mr floyd — questions. during the period you are with mr floyd in— questions. during the period you are with mr floyd in the _ questions. during the period you are with mr floyd in the store _ questions. during the period you are with mr floyd in the store you - questions. during the period you are with mr floyd in the store you said l with mr floyd in the store you said he was _ with mr floyd in the store you said he was alert — with mr floyd in the store you said he was alert, friendly, _ with mr floyd in the store you said he was alert, friendly, talkative. i he was alert, friendly, talkative. yes _ he was alert, friendly, talkative. yes. �* , ., ., ., yes. and when you went out of the store he did _ yes. and when you went out of the store he did a _ yes. and when you went out of the store he did a little _ yes. and when you went out of the store he did a little dance - yes. and when you went out of the store he did a little dance as - yes. and when you went out of the store he did a little dance as he i store he did a little dance as he went _ store he did a little dance as he went the — store he did a little dance as he went the cat _ store he did a little dance as he went the car-— when you got back to the car, at some _ when you got back to the car, at some point— when you got back to the car, at some point he _ when you got back to the car, at some point he nodded _ when you got back to the car, at some point he nodded off. - when you got back to the car, at some point he nodded off. yes. i when you got back to the car, at. some point he nodded off. yes. but ou were some point he nodded off. yes. but you were able _ some point he nodded off. yes. but you were able to _ some point he nodded off. but you were able to wake him. some point he nodded off.“ but you were able to wake him. yes. i some point he nodded off.“ but. you were able to wake him. yes. and talk to— you were able to wake him. yes. and talk to him _ you were able to wake him. yes. and talk to him-— you were able to wake him. yes. and talk to him. yes. and _ you were able to wake him. yes. and talk to him. yes. and then— you were able to wake him. yes. and talk to him. yes. and then he - you were able to wake him. yes. and| talk to him. yes. and then he nodded off aaain. talk to him. and then he nodded off again. yes. talk to him.“ and then he nodded off again. yes. and _ talk to him.“ and then he nodded off again. yes. and at— talk to him.“ and then he nodded off again. yes. and at some - talk to him.“ and then he nodded off again. yes. and at some point - off again. yes. and at some point the police — off again. yes. and at some point the police officers _ off again. yes. and at some point the police officers walked - off again. yes. and at some point the police officers walked up. - off again. yes. and at some pointi the police officers walked up. yes. and ou the police officers walked up. yes. and you woke _ the police officers walked up. yes. and you woke him _ the police officers walked up. yes. and you woke him up _ the police officers walked up. and you woke him up when the the police officers walked up.“ and you woke him up when the police officers _ and you woke him up when the police officers walked _ and you woke him up when the police officers walked up. _ and you woke him up when the police officers walked up. so _ and you woke him up when the police officers walked up. so then _ and you woke him up when the police officers walked up. so then he - and you woke him up when the police officers walked up. so then he was i officers walked up. so then he was awake _ officers walked up. so then he was awake. . ~ ., officers walked up. so then he was awake. , . ., ., ,. awake. yes. when i tried to wake him u - , awake. yes. when i tried to wake him u, he awake. yes. when i tried to wake him up. he woke — awake. yes. when i tried to wake him up. he woke up _ awake. yes. when i tried to wake him up. he woke up the — awake. yes. when i tried to wake him up, he woke up the second _ awake. yes. when i tried to wake him up, he woke up the second time - awake. yes. when i tried to wake him up, he woke up the second time and i i up, he woke up the second time and i said the police with a. we looked to the right and the police tapped on the right and the police tapped on the window with a flashlight. he turned back around again and i said, baby that's the police. so he looked back and a man had the window. so he instantly grabbed the wheel and said please don't kill me, don't shoot me. i have to ask some questions. i am sorry— i have to ask some questions. i am sorry to _ i have to ask some questions. i am sorry to cut— i have to ask some questions. i am sorry to cut you _ i have to ask some questions. i am sorry to cut you off. _ i have to ask some questions. i am sorry to cut you off. i _ i have to ask some questions. i am sorry to cut you off. i want - i have to ask some questions. i am sorry to cut you off. i want to - i have to ask some questions. i am sorry to cut you off. i want to go i sorry to cut you off. i want to go back— sorry to cut you off. i want to go back and — sorry to cut you off. i want to go back and cover _ sorry to cut you off. i want to go back and cover one _ sorry to cut you off. i want to go back and cover one thing - sorry to cut you off. i want to gol back and cover one thing quickly. where _ back and cover one thing quickly. where were — back and cover one thing quickly. where were you _ back and cover one thing quickly. where were you sitting _ back and cover one thing quickly. where were you sitting in- back and cover one thing quickly. where were you sitting in the - where were you sitting in the vehicle? _ where were you sitting in the vehicle? . . where were you sitting in the vehicle? ,., , , , ., where were you sitting in the vehicle? , , , ., was where were you sitting in the vehicle? . . . .. was it vehicle? the passenger seat. was it to officers that _ vehicle? the passenger seat. was it to officers that came _ vehicle? the passenger seat. was it to officers that came to _ vehicle? the passenger seat. was it to officers that came to the - to officers that came to the vehicle? _ to officers that came to the vehicle? yes. _ to officers that came to the vehicle? yes. went- to officers that came to the vehicle? yes. went to - to officers that came to the vehicle? yes. went to the i to officers that came to the - vehicle? yes. went to the passenger side and _ vehicle? yes. went to the passenger side and wanted _ vehicle? yes. went to the passenger side and wanted the _ vehicle? yes. went to the passenger side and wanted the driver— vehicle? yes. went to the passenger side and wanted the driver side. - side and wanted the driver side. initially— side and wanted the driver side. initially you _ side and wanted the driver side. initially you saw— side and wanted the driver side. initially you saw one _ side and wanted the driver side. initially you saw one driver - side and wanted the driver side. initially you saw one driver to i side and wanted the driver side. i initially you saw one driver to your right _ initially you saw one driver to your riuht. �* , ., ., ,. initially you saw one driver to your riuht. �* , ., .,~ , initially you saw one driver to your riuht. �* , ., ,�* right. i'm trying to wake up so i'm the middle _ right. i'm trying to wake up so i'm the middle at _ right. i'm trying to wake up so i'm the middle at the _ right. i'm trying to wake up so i'm the middle at the time. _ right. i'm trying to wake up so i'm the middle at the time. we - right. i'm trying to wake up so i'm the middle at the time. we both i the middle at the time. we both looked at the same time. during this time eriod looked at the same time. during this time period did _ looked at the same time. during this time period did he _ looked at the same time. during this time period did he complain - looked at the same time. during this time period did he complain of - time period did he complain of shortness— time period did he complain of shortness of— time period did he complain of shortness of breath? - time period did he complain of shortness of breath? n0. - time period did he complain of shortness of breath? n0. did i time period did he complain of. shortness of breath? n0. did he shortness of breath? no. did he comlain shortness of breath? did he complain of chest shortness of breath?- did he complain of chest pains? - shortness of breath? no. did he complain of chest pains? no. i shortness of breath? no. did he i complain of chest pains? no. and other than — complain of chest pains? and other than being sleepy or complain of chest pains?- and| other than being sleepy or nodding off, other than being sleepy or nodding off. did _ other than being sleepy or nodding off. did he — other than being sleepy or nodding off, did he seem _ other than being sleepy or nodding off, did he seem abnormal- other than being sleepy or nodding off, did he seem abnormal in - other than being sleepy or nodding off, did he seem abnormal in any. off, did he seem abnormal in any way? _ off, did he seem abnormal in any way? not— off, did he seem abnormal in any way? not at— off, did he seem abnormal in any way? not at alt _ off, did he seem abnormal in any way? not at all. did _ off, did he seem abnormal in any way? not at all. did he _ off, did he seem abnormal in any way? not at all. did he seem - way? not at all. did he seem startled — way? not at all. did he seem startled when— way? not at all. did he seem startled when the _ way? not at all. did he seem startled when the officer - way? not at all. did he seem i startled when the officer pulled way? not at all. did he seem - startled when the officer pulled a -un startled when the officer pulled a gun on— startled when the officer pulled a gun on him? _ startled when the officer pulled a gun on him?— startled when the officer pulled a gun on him?- i _ startled when the officer pulled a gun on him?- i have - startled when the officer pulled a | gun on him? yergr. i have nothing gun on him? very. i have nothing further. so while you were in the car mr floyd _ so while you were in the car mr floyd appeared to be normal. when he -ot floyd appeared to be normal. when he got in _ floyd appeared to be normal. when he got in the _ floyd appeared to be normal. when he got in the car he fell asleep. and then— got in the car he fell asleep. and then ultimately you had to make several— then ultimately you had to make several efforts to try and wake him up. several efforts to try and wake him up yes _ several efforts to try and wake him up yes i— several efforts to try and wake him up. yes. i have nothing further. thank— up. yes. i have nothing further. thank you _ up. yes. i have nothing further. thank you. you are excused. the defence called peter chang. please sway that the testimony you will give is the truth and nothing but the truth. i will give is the truth and nothing but the truth.— will give is the truth and nothing but the truth. i do. take a seat. but the truth. i do. take a seat. can ou but the truth. i do. take a seat. can you give — but the truth. i do. take a seat. can you give us _ but the truth. i do. take a seat. can you give us your— but the truth. i do. take a seat. can you give us your full- but the truth. i do. take a seat. can you give us your full name. peter chang. i551; can you give us your full name. peter chang-— peter chang. by whom are you currently employed? - peter chang. by whom are you currently employed? the - peter chang. by whom are you | currently employed? the many peter chang. by whom are you - currently employed? the many obvious -- many obvious _ currently employed? the many obvious -- many obvious fireplace. _ currently employed? the many obvious -- many obvious fireplace. are - currently employed? the many obvious -- many obvious fireplace. are you - currently employed? the many obvious -- many obvious fireplace. are you a l -- many obvious fireplace. are you a licensed police _ -- many obvious fireplace. are you a licensed police officer? _ -- many obvious fireplace. are you a licensed police officer? can - -- many obvious fireplace. are you a licensed police officer? can you - licensed police officer? can you describe — licensed police officer? can you describe the training and experience you have? _ describe the training and experience you have? i— describe the training and experience ou have? ., you have? i went through the minneapolis _ you have? i went through the minneapolis police _ you have? i went through the minneapolis police academy. | you have? i went through the - minneapolis police academy. prior to that i minneapolis police academy. prior to that i did _ minneapolis police academy. prior to that i did skilfully— minneapolis police academy. prior to that i did skilfully metropolitan- that i did skilfully metropolitan city and — that i did skilfully metropolitan city and passed _ that i did skilfully metropolitan city and passed my _ that i did skilfully metropolitan city and passed my skills. - that i did skilfully metropolitan city and passed my skills. i- that i did skilfully metropolitan. city and passed my skills. i went that i did skilfully metropolitan- city and passed my skills. i went to police _ city and passed my skills. i went to police academy _ city and passed my skills. i went to police academy. after _ city and passed my skills. i went to police academy. after passing - city and passed my skills. i went to police academy. after passing the i police academy. after passing the academy — police academy. after passing the academy l — police academy. after passing the academy i went _ police academy. after passing the academy i went into _ police academy. after passing the academy i went into field - police academy. after passing the | academy i went into field training. after— academy i went into field training. after passing — academy i went into field training. after passing that _ academy i went into field training. after passing that i _ academy i went into field training. after passing that i went _ academy i went into field training. after passing that i went on - academy i went into field training. after passing that i went on the i after passing that i went on the street — after passing that i went on the street. �* .. after passing that i went on the street. �* ., , ., , , after passing that i went on the street. �* ., i. , , i. street. and have you spent your entire career — street. and have you spent your entire career with _ street. and have you spent your entire career with the _ street. and have you spent your l entire career with the minneapolis police _ entire career with the minneapolis police department? yes. and how long have you _ police department? yes. and how long have you been a police officer? this will be my fourth _ have you been a police officer? this will be my fourth year in august. were _ will be my fourth year in august. were you — will be my fourth year in august. were you on _ will be my fourth year in august. were you on duty— will be my fourth year in august. were you on duty in— will be my fourth year in august. were you on duty in may- will be my fourth year in august. were you on duty in may 25th . will be my fourth year in august. - were you on duty in may 25th 2020? yes. were you on duty in may 25th 2020? yes and _ were you on duty in may 25th 2020? yes and did — were you on duty in may 25th 2020? yes. and did you respond to a call at approximately _ yes. and did you respond to a call at approximately 8pm _ yes. and did you respond to a call at approximately 8pm to - yes. and did you respond to a call at approximately 8pm to the - yes. and did you respond to a call at approximately 8pm to the food | at approximately 8pm to the food store _ at approximately 8pm to the food store. . can at approximately 8pm to the food store. yes. can you _ at approximately 8pm to the food store. yes. can you describe - at approximately 8pm to the food store. yes. can you describe the. store. yes. can you describe the 'u how store. yes. can you describe the jury how it _ store. yes. can you describe the jury how it is _ store. yes. can you describe the jury how it is you _ store.“ can you describe the jury how it is you became - store.“ can you describe the jury how it is you became a - store.“ can you describe the jury how it is you became a part| store.“ can you describe the l jury how it is you became a part of this incident? _ jury how it is you became a part of this incident? [— jury how it is you became a part of this incident?— jury how it is you became a part of this incident? i was stationed close b . i this incident? i was stationed close by- i heard — this incident? i was stationed close by- i heard a _ this incident? i was stationed close by. i heard a lot _ this incident? i was stationed close by. i heard a lot of— this incident? i was stationed close by. i heard a lot of background - by. i heard a lot of background noises — by. i heard a lot of background noises and _ by. i heard a lot of background noises and i heard a dispatch asking for assistance. noises and i heard a dispatch asking forassistance. i noises and i heard a dispatch asking for assistance. i was one of the closest — for assistance. i was one of the closest squads so i self assigned to that calt _ closest squads so i self assigned to that calt |s— closest squads so i self assigned to that call. . closest squads so i self assigned to that call. , _, ., ., that call. is it common for minneapolis _ that call. is it common for minneapolis police - that call. is it common for minneapolis police to - that call. is it common for. minneapolis police to assist that call. is it common for- minneapolis police to assist uncles? yes. ., , . ., , ., , yes. your 'urisdiction is generally within the yes. yourjurisdiction is generally within the parks? _ yes. yourjurisdiction is generally within the parks? yes. _ yes. yourjurisdiction is generally within the parks? yes. however, | yes. yourjurisdiction is generally - within the parks? yes. however, you are able to — within the parks? however, you are able to back—up within the parks?“ however, you are able to back—up or— within the parks?“ however, you are able to back—up or assist- are able to back—up or assist officers? _ are able to back-up or assist officers?— are able to back-up or assist officers?- one _ are able to back—up or assist officers? yes. one quick- are able to back—up or assist- officers? yes. one quick question about your— officers?“ one quick question about your experience. _ officers?“ one quick question about your experience. you - officers?“ one quick question about your experience. you said i officers?“ one quick question i about your experience. you said you went _ about your experience. you said you went to _ about your experience. you said you went to the — about your experience. you said you went to the minneapolis _ about your experience. you said you went to the minneapolis police - went to the minneapolis police academy _ went to the minneapolis police academy. even— went to the minneapolis police academy. even though - went to the minneapolis police academy. even though you - went to the minneapolis police l academy. even though you were looking — academy. even though you were looking to — academy. even though you were looking to become _ academy. even though you were looking to become a _ academy. even though you were | looking to become a minneapolis academy. even though you were - looking to become a minneapolis park police _ looking to become a minneapolis park police officer~ — looking to become a minneapolis park police officer. though— looking to become a minneapolis park police officer. though the _ looking to become a minneapolis park police officer. though the park- police officer. though the park police — police officer. though the park police and _ police officer. though the park police and minneapolis - police officer. though the park police and minneapolis policei police and minneapolis police department _ police and minneapolis police department have _ police and minneapolis police department have the - police and minneapolis police department have the same i police and minneapolis police - department have the same academy? yes. department have the same academy? yes do— department have the same academy? yes do you _ department have the same academy? yes do you have _ department have the same academy? yes. do you have the _ department have the same academy? yes. do you have the same _ department have the same academy? yes. do you have the same field - yes. do you have the same field training? — yes. do you have the same field training? l— yes. do you have the same field trainin: ? . yes. do you have the same field trainin: ? , ,., yes. do you have the same field training?_ do - yes. do you have the same field training?_ do you i training? i believe so. do you participate — training? i believe so. do you participate in _ training? i believe so. do you participate in continuing - training? i believe so. do you - participate in continuing education in-service — participate in continuing education in-service as — participate in continuing education in-service as a _ participate in continuing education in—service as a police _ participate in continuing education in—service as a police officer? - participate in continuing education| in—service as a police officer? yes. in-service as a police officer? yes. so ou in-service as a police officer? yes. so you responded _ in-service as a police officer? yes. so you responded to _ in-service as a police officer? yes. so you responded to the _ in—service as a police officer? so you responded to the location in—service as a police officer?“ so you responded to the location and can you _ so you responded to the location and can you describe _ so you responded to the location and can you describe to _ so you responded to the location and can you describe to the _ so you responded to the location and can you describe to the jury - can you describe to the jury initially— can you describe to the jury initially what— can you describe to the jury initially what you _ can you describe to the jury initially what you observed. when i not there i initially what you observed. when i got there i initially _ initially what you observed. when i got there i initially stopped - initially what you observed. when i got there i initially stopped and - got there i initially stopped and observed the two officers across the street _ observed the two officers across the street so _ observed the two officers across the street so i_ observed the two officers across the street so i drove much across the street— street so i drove much across the street and — street so i drove much across the street and park. i got out of my cat _ street and park. i got out of my cat i_ street and park. i got out of my car. i observed officer came dotted at~~ _ car. i observed officer came dotted at... .. r' car. i observed officer came dotted at... let me ask you quickly, did ou at... let me ask you quickly, did you know _ at... let me ask you quickly, did you know either _ at... let me ask you quickly, did you know either of _ at... let me ask you quickly, did you know either of the _ at... let me ask you quickly, did you know either of the offices i at... let me ask you quickly, did i you know either of the offices prior to this _ you know either of the offices prior to this incident? _ you know either of the offices prior to this incident? h0. _ you know either of the offices prior to this incident? n0. were - you know either of the offices prior to this incident? n0. were you - you know either of the offices prior. to this incident? n0. were you asked to this incident? no. were you asked to this incident? his. were you asked to do to this incident? were you asked to do something? to this incident? no. were you asked to do something? when _ to this incident? no. were you asked to do something? when i _ to this incident? no. were you asked to do something? when i got - to this incident? no. were you asked to do something? when i got out - to this incident? no. were you asked to do something? when i got out of. to do something? when i got out of m car to do something? when i got out of my car one — to do something? when i got out of my car one officer— to do something? when i got out of my car one officer asked _ to do something? when i got out of my car one officer asked me - to do something? when i got out of my car one officer asked me to - my car one officer asked me to identify— my car one officer asked me to identify floyd and assist them. sol went back— identify floyd and assist them. sol went back to my squad car and identified — went back to my squad car and identified floyd.— went back to my squad car and identified floyd. what happened next? once _ identified floyd. what happened next? once i— identified floyd. what happened next? once i was _ identified floyd. what happened next? once i was in _ identified floyd. what happened next? once i was in my - identified floyd. what happened next? once i was in my car - next? once i was in my car identifying _ next? once i was in my car identifying floyd _ next? once i was in my car identifying floyd i - next? once i was in my car identifying floyd i saw - next? once i was in my car identifying floyd i saw the | next? once i was in my car i identifying floyd i saw the two officers — identifying floyd i saw the two officers assisting floyd towards the car. .. y ., officers assisting floyd towards the car. ., , ., , . , officers assisting floyd towards the car. ., ,. , g; z: car. can you describe way scored 320 was packed — car. can you describe way scored 320 was packed and _ car. can you describe way scored 320 was packed and where _ car. can you describe way scored 320 was packed and where you _ car. can you describe way scored 320 was packed and where you were - was packed and where you were packed? — was packed and where you were acked? q; :: was packed and where you were acked? ,': ii ., , was packed and where you were acked? x; :: .,, ~ was packed and where you were acked? ,': ii .,, ~' ., ., packed? 320 was parked in front of the food store. _ packed? 320 was parked in front of the food store. in _ packed? 320 was parked in front of the food store. in the _ packed? 320 was parked in front of the food store. in the north - packed? 320 was parked in front of the food store. in the north bound| the food store. in the north bound lane facing — the food store. in the north bound lane facing south down. i was across the street— lane facing south down. i was across the street and i believe the front of my— the street and i believe the front of my squad car was facing east. did ou of my squad car was facing east. you then of my squad car was facing east. did you then move your squad car? of my squad car was facing east. didi you then move your squad car? yes. once i identified _ you then move your squad car? yes. once i identified floyd _ you then move your squad car? once i identified floyd because i observed — once i identified floyd because i observed the officers assisting floyd — observed the officers assisting floyd to — observed the officers assisting floyd to their squad car i moved my squad _ floyd to their squad car i moved my squad car— floyd to their squad car i moved my squad car around and parked in front of the _ squad car around and parked in front of the cat _ squad car around and parked in front of the can so— squad car around and parked in front of the car. ,. squad car around and parked in front of the car. i. .., , squad car around and parked in front ofthe car. , of the car. so your cars were nose to nose? — of the car. so your cars were nose to nose? yes- _ of the car. so your cars were nose to nose? yes. what _ of the car. so your cars were nose to nose? yes. what happened - of the car. so your cars were nose i to nose? yes. what happened next? of the car. so your cars were nose - to nose? yes. what happened next? i not out of to nose? yes. what happened next? i got out of my — to nose? yes. what happened next? i got out of my squad — to nose? yes. what happened next? i got out of my squad car— to nose? yes. what happened next? i got out of my squad car and _ to nose? yes. what happened next? i got out of my squad car and observed | got out of my squad car and observed both offices _ got out of my squad car and observed both offices putting floyd against the squad car. once i approached them _ the squad car. once i approached them one — the squad car. once i approached them one officer told me to go and watch _ them one officer told me to go and watch the — them one officer told me to go and watch the car. and you did that? yes _ watch the car. and you did that? yes. �* , ., ., yes. and where did you go in relation to — yes. and where did you go in relation to the _ yes. and where did you go in relation to the car? - yes. and where did you go in relation to the car? i - yes. and where did you go in | relation to the car? i basically went across — relation to the car? i basically went across the _ relation to the car? i basically went across the street - relation to the car? i basically went across the street to - relation to the car? i basically went across the street to the | relation to the car? i basically - went across the street to the car. and what — went across the street to the car. and what did you do then? when i approached the car i observed the two individuals and so them reach inside _ two individuals and so them reach inside the — two individuals and so them reach inside the car and i told them to back— inside the car and i told them to back away— inside the car and i told them to back away from the car. 30 inside the car and i told them to back away from the car.- inside the car and i told them to back away from the car. so you were monitorin: back away from the car. so you were monitoring what _ back away from the car. so you were monitoring what the _ back away from the car. so you were monitoring what the two _ back away from the car. so you were monitoring what the two passengers| monitoring what the two passengers were doing? — monitoring what the two passengers were doing? yes _ monitoring what the two passengers were doing? yes. was— monitoring what the two passengers were doing? yes. was your- monitoring what the two passengers| were doing? yes. was your attention focused _ were doing? yes. was your attention focused on _ were doing? yes. was your attention focused on what _ were doing? yes. was your attention focused on what the _ were doing? yes. was your attention focused on what the officers - were doing? yes. was your attention focused on what the officers were - focused on what the officers were doing _ focused on what the officers were doing or— focused on what the officers were doing or was _ focused on what the officers were doing or was it_ focused on what the officers were doing or was it focused _ focused on what the officers were doing or was it focused on- focused on what the officers were doing or was it focused on what i focused on what the officers were i doing or was it focused on what the passengers — doing or was it focused on what the passengers were _ doing or was it focused on what the passengers were doing? _ doing or was it focused on what the passengers were doing? i- doing or was it focused on what the passengers were doing? [was - doing or was it focused on what the passengers were doing? i was more focused on the _ passengers were doing? i was more focused on the vehicle _ passengers were doing? i was more focused on the vehicle with - passengers were doing? i was more focused on the vehicle with two - focused on the vehicle with two passengers. put focused on the vehicle with two passengers-— focused on the vehicle with two assenuers. �* ,., ,., i. passengers. at some point did you observe another _ passengers. at some point did you observe another squad _ passengers. at some point did you observe another squad car - passengers. at some point did you observe another squad car arrive? | observe another squad car arrive? yes _ observe another squad car arrive? yes can — observe another squad car arrive? yes can you _ observe another squad car arrive? yes. can you describe _ observe another squad car arrive? yes. can you describe that - yes. can you describe that interaction? _ yes. can you describe that interaction?— yes. can you describe that interaction? , ., ,':,':ii ., interaction? squad 330 arrived cominu interaction? squad 330 arrived coming westbound. _ interaction? squad 330 arrived coming westbound. they - interaction? squad 330 arrived i coming westbound. they parked interaction? squad 330 arrived - coming westbound. they parked in front and _ coming westbound. they parked in front and i— coming westbound. they parked in front and i directed them towards 320~ _ front and i directed them towards 320. , , ., front and i directed them towards 320. , ~ ., front and i directed them towards 320., ~ ., , 320. did you know the offices in st uad 320. did you know the offices in squad 320? _ 320. did you know the offices in squad 320? no. _ 320. did you know the offices in squad 320? no. what— 320. did you know the offices in squad 320? no. what happens. 320. did you know the offices in - squad 320? no. what happens next? squad 320? his. what happens next? they squad 320? what happens next? they went squad 320?- what happens next? they went across _ squad 320?- what happens next? they went across the _ squad 320?- what happens next? they went across the street - squad 320?- what happens next? they went across the street and - squad 320?- what happens next? they went across the street and i - they went across the street and i assisted — they went across the street and i assisted 320 and again at my main focus _ assisted 320 and again at my main focus was — assisted 320 and again at my main focus was the car with the two individuals. fits focus was the car with the two individuals.— focus was the car with the two individuals. �* , ~ ., individuals. as mr floyd and the offices were _ individuals. as mr floyd and the offices were across _ individuals. as mr floyd and the offices were across the - individuals. as mr floyd and the offices were across the street i individuals. as mr floyd and the l offices were across the street did you notice — offices were across the street did you notice any— offices were across the street did you notice any changes? - offices were across the street did you notice any changes? yes. - offices were across the street did you notice any changes? yes. there was a crowd — you notice any changes? yes. there was a crowd and _ you notice any changes? yes. there was a crowd and the _ you notice any changes? yes. there was a crowd and the crowd - you notice any changes? yes. there was a crowd and the crowd was - was a crowd and the crowd was becoming — was a crowd and the crowd was becoming more loud and aggressive. did that _ becoming more loud and aggressive. did that cause you any concern? concern — did that cause you any concern? concern for— did that cause you any concern? concern for the _ did that cause you any concern? concern for the offices - did that cause you any concern? concern for the offices safety, i did that cause you any concern? i concern for the offices safety, yes. did you _ concern for the offices safety, yes. did you try— concern for the offices safety, yes. did you try and help them? no because did you try and help them? because myjob was to watch did you try and help them?- because myjob was to watch the car and the _ because myjob was to watch the car and the two — because myjob was to watch the car and the two individuals. did because my job was to watch the car and the two individuals.— and the two individuals. did you know whether _ and the two individuals. did you know whether the _ and the two individuals. did you know whether the car _ and the two individuals. did you know whether the car had - and the two individuals. did you know whether the car had been | know whether the car had been searched? _ know whether the car had been searched? at _ know whether the car had been searched? at that _ know whether the car had been searched? at that time - know whether the car had been| searched? at that time though. know whether the car had been - searched? at that time though. ltilti�*ere searched? at that time though. were ou searched? at that time though. were you concerned _ searched? at that time though. were you concerned about _ searched? at that time though. you concerned about that? yes. searched? at that time though. were you concerned about that? yes. i - searched? at that time though. were you concerned about that? yes. i am | you concerned about that? yes. i am assumina you concerned about that? yes. i am assuming that _ you concerned about that? yes. i am assuming that on _ you concerned about that? yes. i am assuming that on this _ you concerned about that? yes. i am assuming that on this day you were in a uniform — assuming that on this day you were in a uniform similar— assuming that on this day you were in a uniform similar to— assuming that on this day you were in a uniform similar to what - assuming that on this day you were in a uniform similar to what a - in a uniform similar to what a minneapolis— in a uniform similar to what a minneapolis police _ in a uniform similar to what a minneapolis police officer - in a uniform similar to what a i minneapolis police officer would weigh? — minneapolis police officer would weiah? . minneapolis police officer would weigh? yes. with— minneapolis police officer would weigh? yes. with all— minneapolis police officer would weigh? yes. with all of- minneapolis police officer would weigh? yes. with all of the - minneapolis police officer would i weigh? yes. with all of the duty belt and all _ weigh? yes. with all of the duty belt and all of _ weigh? yes. with all of the duty belt and all of the _ weigh?“ with all of the duty belt and all of the things - weigh?“ with all of the duty belt and all of the things on - weigh?“ with all of the duty belt and all of the things on the| belt and all of the things on the duty belt — belt and all of the things on the duty belt yes _ belt and all of the things on the duty belt. yes. you _ belt and all of the things on the duty belt. yes. you were - belt and all of the things on the| duty belt. yes. you were driving belt and all of the things on the i duty belt. yes. you were driving in marked _ duty belt. yes. you were driving in marked squad _ duty belt. yes. you were driving in marked squad car. _ duty belt. yes. you were driving in marked squad car. yes. _ duty belt. yes. you were driving in marked squad car. yes. does - duty belt. yes. you were driving in marked squad car. yes. does your| marked squad car. yes. does your department— marked squad car. yes. does your department require _ marked squad car. yes. does your department require you _ marked squad car. yes. does your department require you to - marked squad car. yes. does your department require you to wear. marked squad car. yes. does your department require you to wear a | department require you to wear a camera? — department require you to wear a camera? yes _ department require you to wear a camera? yes. was— department require you to wear a camera? yes. was the _ department require you to wear a camera? yes. was the camera i department require you to wear a . camera? yes. was the camera active and recording — camera? yes. was the camera active and recording this— camera? yes. was the camera active and recording this event? _ camera? yes. was the camera active and recording this event? yes. - camera? yes. was the camera active and recording this event? yes. havel and recording this event? yes. have you had _ and recording this event? yes. have you had an _ and recording this event? yes. have you had an opportunity _ and recording this event? yes. have you had an opportunity at _ and recording this event? yes. have you had an opportunity at this - and recording this event? yes. have you had an opportunity at this pointl you had an opportunity at this point to review— you had an opportunity at this point to review the — you had an opportunity at this point to review the footage _ you had an opportunity at this point to review the footage that - you had an opportunity at this point to review the footage that was - you had an opportunity at this pointi to review the footage that was taken by your— to review the footage that was taken by your camera? _ to review the footage that was taken by yourcamera? i_ to review the footage that was taken by your camera? i have. _ to review the footage that was taken by your camera? i have. and- to review the footage that was taken by your camera? i have. and those i by your camera? i have. and those that appear— by your camera? i have. and those that appear to _ by your camera? i have. and those that appear to be _ by your camera? i have. and those that appear to be a _ by your camera? i have. and those that appear to be a fair— by your camera? i have. and those that appear to be a fair and - that appear to be a fair and accurate _ that appear to be a fair and accurate representation- that appear to be a fair and accurate representation of| that appear to be a fair and i accurate representation of the things— accurate representation of the things you _ accurate representation of the things you observed? - accurate representation of the things you observed? yes. - accurate representation of the things you observed? yes. ini accurate representation of the - things you observed? yes. in terms of the _ things you observed? yes. in terms of the crowd — things you observed? yes. in terms of the crowd or— things you observed? yes. in terms of the crowd or group _ things you observed? yes. in terms of the crowd or group of _ things you observed? yes. in terms of the crowd or group of people - of the crowd or group of people congregating _ of the crowd or group of people congregating around _ of the crowd or group of people congregating around the - of the crowd or group of people congregating around the squad | of the crowd or group of people - congregating around the squad 320, did you _ congregating around the squad 320, did you notice — congregating around the squad 320, did you notice anything _ congregating around the squad 320, did you notice anything in _ congregating around the squad 320, did you notice anything in terms - congregating around the squad 320, did you notice anything in terms of. did you notice anything in terms of the tone _ did you notice anything in terms of the tone of— did you notice anything in terms of the tone of the _ did you notice anything in terms of the tone of the voices _ did you notice anything in terms of the tone of the voices of _ did you notice anything in terms of the tone of the voices of those - the tone of the voices of those people? — the tone of the voices of those eo - le? , , the tone of the voices of those eo le? , , ., , , people? they were very aggressive. au aressive people? they were very aggressive. aggressive towards _ people? they were very aggressive. aggressive towards the _ people? they were very aggressive. aggressive towards the officers. - people? they were very aggressive. aggressive towards the officers. did the volume increase? yes. how were ou the volume increase? yes. how were you reacting? — the volume increase? yes. how were you reacting? i— the volume increase? yes. how were you reacting? i was _ the volume increase? yes. how were you reacting? i was focused - the volume increase? yes. how were you reacting? i was focused on - the volume increase? yes. how were you reacting? i was focused on the i you reacting? i was focused on the car and i you reacting? i was focused on the car and i was _ you reacting? i was focused on the car and i was scared _ you reacting? i was focused on the car and i was scared for— you reacting? i was focused on the car and i was scared for the - you reacting? i was focused on the car and i was scared for the officesi car and i was scared for the offices safety _ and if we canjust show a couple of parts _ and if we canjust show a couple of parts of— and if we canjust show a couple of parts of your — and if we canjust show a couple of parts of your body— and if we canjust show a couple of parts of your body one _ and if we canjust show a couple of parts of your body one camera - and if we canjust show a couple of parts of your body one camera and| and if we canjust show a couple of. parts of your body one camera and if you just _ parts of your body one camera and if you just look — parts of your body one camera and if you just look at _ parts of your body one camera and if you just look at the _ parts of your body one camera and if you just look at the screen _ parts of your body one camera and if you just look at the screen in - parts of your body one camera and if you just look at the screen in front i you just look at the screen in front of you _ you just look at the screen in front of you does — you just look at the screen in front of you. does this _ you just look at the screen in front of you. does this appear _ you just look at the screen in front of you. does this appear to - you just look at the screen in front of you. does this appear to be - you just look at the screen in fronti of you. does this appear to be your camera? _ of you. does this appear to be your camera? . of you. does this appear to be your camera?- at — of you. does this appear to be your camera?- at the _ of you. does this appear to be your camera? yes. at the top— of you. does this appear to be youri camera? yes. at the top right—hand camera? yes. at the top right-hand corner there — camera? yes. at the top right-hand corner there is _ camera? yes. at the top right-hand corner there is a _ camera?“ at the top right—hand corner there is a date. _ camera?“ at the top right—hand corner there is a date. when- camera?“ at the top right—hand corner there is a date. when was i camera?“ at the top right—hand i corner there is a date. when was the date? _ corner there is a date. when was the date? ~ .. , ~ corner there is a date. when was the date? a,’ ~ :: i: corner there is a date. when was the date?_ and _ corner there is a date. when was the date?_ and i - corner there is a date. when was the date?_ and i notice i corner there is a date. when was the | date?_ and i notice the date? may 26, 2020. and i notice the time here of— date? may 26, 2020. and i notice the time here of 110. _ date? may 26, 2020. and i notice the time here of 110. are _ date? may 26, 2020. and i notice the time here of 110. are you _ date? may 26, 2020. and i notice the time here of 110. are you familiar - time here of 110. are you familiar with greenwich _ time here of 110. are you familiar with greenwich mean _ time here of 110. are you familiar with greenwich mean time? - time here of 110. are you familiar with greenwich mean time? no. i time here of 110. are you familiar. with greenwich mean time? no. so time here of 110. are you familiar- with greenwich mean time? no. so you don't know— with greenwich mean time? no. so you don't know why— with greenwich mean time? no. so you don't know why the _ with greenwich mean time? no. so you don't know why the timestamp, - with greenwich mean time? no. so you don't know why the timestamp, what i don't know why the timestamp, what time would _ don't know why the timestamp, what time would you — don't know why the timestamp, what time would you estimate _ don't know why the timestamp, what time would you estimate you - don't know why the timestamp, what time would you estimate you were i time would you estimate you were dispatched — time would you estimate you were dispatched to _ time would you estimate you were dispatched to this _ time would you estimate you were dispatched to this call? _ time would you estimate you were dispatched to this call? i- time would you estimate you were dispatched to this call?— time would you estimate you were dispatched to this call? i would say around five — dispatched to this call? i would say around five past _ dispatched to this call? i would say around five past eight. _ dispatched to this call? i would say around five past eight. obviously i around five past eight. obviously there is a time _ around five past eight. obviously there is a time difference - around five past eight. obviously there is a time difference you i there is a time difference you because — there is a time difference you because it _ there is a time difference you because it says _ there is a time difference you because it says 1:10pm. - there is a time difference you because it says 1:10pm. but i there is a time difference you | because it says 1:10pm. but it there is a time difference you - because it says 1:10pm. but it does appear— because it says 1:10pm. but it does appear to _ because it says 1:10pm. but it does appear to be — because it says 1:10pm. but it does appearto be your— because it says 1:10pm. but it does appear to be your camera - because it says 1:10pm. but it does appear to be your camera from - because it says 1:10pm. but it does| appear to be your camera from that day. appear to be your camera from that da . . the appear to be your camera from that day-- the same _ appear to be your camera from that day. yes. the same things- appear to be your camera from that day. yes. the same things you - day. yes. the same things you observed _ day. yes. the same things you observed before. _ day. yes. the same things you observed before. yes. - day. yes. the same things you observed before. yes. your. day. yes. the same things you - observed before. yes. your honour, i would move — observed before. yes. your honour, i would move to _ observed before.“ your honour, i would move to commit _ observed before.“ your honour, i would move to commit exhibit - observed before.“ your honour, i would move to commit exhibit 1054. i would move to commit exhibit 1054. we will— would move to commit exhibit 1054. we will watch — would move to commit exhibit 1054. we will watch about _ would move to commit exhibit 1054. we will watch about three _ would move to commit exhibit 1054. we will watch about three minutes i would move to commit exhibit 1054.| we will watch about three minutes of your body— we will watch about three minutes of your body camera _ we will watch about three minutes of your body camera. permission - we will watch about three minutes of your body camera. permission to - your body camera. permission to publish — what's your name? george. last name? floyd. date of birth? october 14. george flo d. does that represent that initial interaction _ does that represent that initial interaction you _ does that represent that initial interaction you have _ does that represent that initial interaction you have with - does that represent that initial interaction you have with the l does that represent that initial i interaction you have with the two officers _ interaction you have with the two officers and — interaction you have with the two officers and mr— interaction you have with the two officers and mr floyd _ interaction you have with the two officers and mr floyd and - interaction you have with the two officers and mr floyd and the - officers and mr floyd and the passengers _ officers and mr floyd and the passengers of _ officers and mr floyd and the passengers of the _ officers and mr floyd and the passengers of the vehicle? i officers and mr floyd and the i passengers of the vehicle? yes. officers and mr floyd and the - passengers of the vehicle? yes. did ou then passengers of the vehicle? yes. did you then use _ passengers of the vehicle? yes. did you then use your _ passengers of the vehicle? did you then use your computer to passengers of the vehicle?“ didi you then use your computer to enter in the _ you then use your computer to enter in the name _ you then use your computer to enter in the name of— you then use your computer to enter in the name of george _ you then use your computer to enter in the name of george floyd? - you then use your computer to enter in the name of george floyd? yes. i in the name of george floyd? yes. after ou in the name of george floyd? yes. after you did _ in the name of george floyd? yes. after you did that, _ in the name of george floyd? yes. after you did that, what _ in the name of george floyd? after you did that, what happens next? _ after you did that, what happens next? ., , . , after you did that, what happens next? .,' . , after you did that, what happens next? . , , ., next? the officers took george floyd to their squad _ next? the officers took george floyd to their squad car. _ next? the officers took george floyd to their squad car. i _ next? the officers took george floyd to their squad car. i took— next? the officers took george floyd to their squad car. i took my - next? the officers took george floyd to their squad car. i took my squad i to their squad car. i took my squad car around — to their squad car. i took my squad cararound so— to their squad car. i took my squad cararound so i to their squad car. i took my squad car around so i could be closer and i car around so i could be closer and i got _ car around so i could be closer and i got out _ car around so i could be closer and i got out of— car around so i could be closer and i got out of the car and again i observed _ i got out of the car and again i observed the offices pinning floyd against _ observed the offices pinning floyd against their squad car so i went to assist _ against their squad car so i went to assist but — against their squad car so i went to assist but once i approached them one officer— assist but once i approached them one officer told me to go and watch the cat _ one officer told me to go and watch the car. if— one officer told me to go and watch the car. . ., ., ,. , one officer told me to go and watch the car. _, ., ,. , ., the car. if we could take this down, our the car. if we could take this down, your honour- _ the car. if we could take this down, your honour. in _ the car. if we could take this down, your honour. in front _ the car. if we could take this down, your honour. in front of— the car. if we could take this down, your honour. in front of you - the car. if we could take this down, your honour. in front of you i - the car. if we could take this down, your honour. in front of you i am i your honour. in front of you i am again— your honour. in front of you i am again showing _ your honour. in front of you i am again showing you _ your honour. in front of you i am again showing you part - your honour. in front of you i am again showing you part of - your honour. in front of you i am again showing you part of your. your honour. in front of you i am i again showing you part of your body camera _ again showing you part of your body camera footage _ again showing you part of your body camera footage. it _ again showing you part of your body camera footage. it appears - again showing you part of your body camera footage. it appears to - again showing you part of your body camera footage. it appears to be i again showing you part of your bodyl camera footage. it appears to be the same _ camera footage. it appears to be the same date _ camera footage. it appears to be the same date after— camera footage. it appears to be the same date after you _ camera footage. it appears to be the same date after you have _ camera footage. it appears to be the same date after you have run - camera footage. it appears to be the same date after you have run the - same date after you have run the information— same date after you have run the information and _ same date after you have run the information and looped _ same date after you have run the information and looped the - same date after you have run the information and looped the car. information and looped the car around — information and looped the car around does— information and looped the car around. does this _ information and looped the car around. does this video - information and looped the car- around. does this video accurately reflect— around. does this video accurately reflect what — around. does this video accurately reflect what you _ around. does this video accurately reflect what you saw _ around. does this video accurately reflect what you saw that - around. does this video accurately reflect what you saw that day? - around. does this video accurately. reflect what you saw that day? yes. i reflect what you saw that day? yes. i would _ reflect what you saw that day? yes. i would move — reflect what you saw that day? yes. i would move for— reflect what you saw that day? yes. i would move for the _ reflect what you saw that day? yes. i would move for the admission - reflect what you saw that day? yes. i would move for the admission of. i would move for the admission of exhibit— i would move for the admission of exhibit 1055 — i would move for the admission of exhibit 1055 which _ i would move for the admission of exhibit 1055 which is _ i would move for the admission of exhibit 1055 which is a _ i would move for the admission of exhibit 1055 which is a 23 - i would move for the admission of exhibit 1055 which is a 23 minute i exhibit 1055 which is a 23 minute part of— exhibit 1055 which is a 23 minute part of mr— exhibit 1055 which is a 23 minute part of mr chang's _ exhibit 1055 which is a 23 minute part of mr chang's body- exhibit 1055 which is a 23 minute part of mr chang's body camera. | exhibit 1055 which is a 23 minute - part of mr chang's body camera. 1055 is received- — part of mr chang's body camera. 1055 is received. permission _ part of mr chang's body camera. 1055 is received. permission to _ part of mr chang's body camera. 1055 is received. permission to publish. i don't take anything from the car. leave _ don't take anything from the car. leave the — don't take anything from the car. leave the car— don't take anything from the car. leave the car alone. _ don't take anything from the car. leave the car alone. just - don't take anything from the car. leave the car alone. just leave i don't take anything from the car. i leave the car alone. just leave the car alone — leave the car alone. just leave the car alone how— leave the car alone. just leave the car alone. how are _ leave the car alone. just leave the car alone. how are you _ leave the car alone. just leave the car alone. how are you doing? - leave the car alone. just leave the i car alone. how are you doing? good. what did you guys take out of the car? _ what did you guys take out of the car? cigarettes. _ what did you guys take out of the car? cigarettes. any— what did you guys take out of the car? cigarettes. any personal- what did you guys take out of the - car? cigarettes. any personal items? it's car? cigarettes. any personal items? it's all— car? cigarettes. any personal items? it's all in _ car? cigarettes. any personal items? it's all in there — car? cigarettes. any personal items? it's all in there. whose _ car? cigarettes. any personal items? it's all in there. whose car— car? cigarettes. any personal items? it's all in there. whose car is - it's all in there. whose car is this? — it's all in there. whose car is this? it— it's all in there. whose car is this? �* ., ., it's all in there. whose car is this? ~ ., ., ., , this? a female named... i am trying to think of — this? a female named... i am trying to think of her _ this? a female named... i am trying to think of her name. _ this? a female named... i am trying to think of her name. who _ this? a female named... i am trying to think of her name. who is - this? a female named... i am trying to think of her name. who is he - this? a female named... i am trying to think of her name. who is he to i to think of her name. who is he to ou to think of her name. who is he to you guys? — to think of her name. who is he to you guys? my _ to think of her name. who is he to you guys? my x- _ to think of her name. who is he to you guys? my x- and _ to think of her name. who is he to you guys? my x. and i _ to think of her name. who is he to you guys? my x. and i just - to think of her name. who is he to you guys? my x. and i just saw i to think of her name. who is he to i you guys? my x. and ijust saw him you guys? my x. and i 'ust saw him in the store — you guys? my x. and i 'ust saw him in the store so he _ you guys? my x. and i 'ust saw him in the store so he was _ you guys? my x. and ijust saw him in the store so he was going - you guys? my x. and ijust saw him in the store so he was going to - you guys? my x. and ijust saw him in the store so he was going to givei in the store so he was going to give me a _ in the store so he was going to give me a ride _ in the store so he was going to give me a ride home. just stay there. is anyone going to check my bag _ just stay there. is anyone going to check my bag because _ just stay there. is anyone going to check my bag because my - just stay there. is anyone going to i check my bag because my daughter is on her_ check my bag because my daughter is on her way— check my bag because my daughter is on heran here _ did you give my pattern of the names? — did you give my pattern of the names? , did you give my pattern of the names?- did _ did you give my pattern of the names?- did he _ did you give my pattern of the names? yes, did he write - did you give my pattern of the names? yes, did he write it. did you give my pattern of the - names? yes, did he write it down? did you give my pattern of the names?- did he write it down? names? yes. did he write it down? i want to see — names? yes. did he write it down? i want to see what _ names? yes. did he write it down? i want to see what my _ names? yes. did he write it down? i want to see what my partner - names? yes. did he write it down? i want to see what my partner does. l names? yes. did he write it down? i. want to see what my partner does. he still want to see what my partner does. still won't want to see what my partner does. he still won't get in the car. just sit down _ still won't get in the car. just sit down they— still won't get in the car. just sit down they are _ still won't get in the car. just sit down. they are going _ still won't get in the car. just sit down. they are going to - still won't get in the car. just sit down. they are going to push. still won't get in the car. just sit. down. they are going to push him still won't get in the car. just sit- down. they are going to push him in the can _ down. they are going to push him in the can he's — down. they are going to push him in the car. he's trying _ down. they are going to push him in the car. he's trying to— down. they are going to push him in the car. he's trying to get— down. they are going to push him in the car. he's trying to get out. - the car. he's trying to get out. what _ the car. he's trying to get out. what is — the car. he's trying to get out. what is he _ the car. he's trying to get out. what is he doing? _ we will see what happens already. stay there. they are still fighting him! what is he doing? —

Related Keywords

Bbc News , Hello , Headlines , Victoria Derbyshire , Government , Vaccine , Group , Everyone , Vaccination Programme , Priority Groups , Target , England , Phase , Covid Jab , 49 , Nine , 45 , 16 , Two , Cases , Variant , Care Home , Outbreak , Cluster , Scotland , South London , Intensive Covid Testing , South African , 10 , Police , Unrest , Us , Black Man , City Of Minneapolis , Elite , People , Researchers , World , Lifestyle , Climate Change , Afternoon , Risk , Dose , Adults , Ministers , Track , The End , Officals Race , Ofjuly , Fifty , Prime Minister , Residents , Infections , Significant , Tests , Economy , South African Variant , Hundreds Of Thousands , Groups , Milestone , Uk , Jim Reed , Over 50s , 50 , Everybody , Age Group , Vaccination Centre , Reading , One , Appointments , Website , Nhs , Vaccines , Forward , Site , Pfizer , Jab , Slot , Thousands , Astrazeneca , Running , 32 Million , Doses , Age Groups , Booster Dose , Shot , Jabs , Supplies , Confidence , Supply Forecast , The American , Firm Moderna , Wales , Chance , April 15 , 15 , Pandemic , Rules , Shops , Time , Drive , Deaths , Public , Vaccine Roll , Wave , Pub Gardens , Scientists , Part , Problem , Each Other , Infection , Solution , Lot , Care , Virus , Reminder , Lambeth , Wandsworth , Resident , Boroughs , Pcr Covid Test , South Africa , Community , Spread , Contacts , Testing , Tracing , Lambeth Council , Anyone , Control , Living , Both , It , Reporting , Use , Blood Clots , Covid , Health Authorities , Johnson And , Seven Million , Six , Hasn T , Laura Foster , Regulators , Has , 30 Million , Health Agencies , Blood Clot , Phrase , Caution , Abundance , Thing , Women , Sex , Hospital , Others , States , Who , This , Yes , Peeple , Find , 7 Million , 6 8 Million , Idea , Everything , Percentage , Clots , Ha Ened , Hauened , Benefits , Dutch Medicines Regulator , Risks , Ust In , Information , Thisjust In , South African Variant Emerging , Dutch , Thejohnson Johnson , Document , Individual , Have , South , Rise , From South , Person , Country , Link , Red List , Contact Tracers , Assumptions , Africa , Hotel Quarantine , Members , Household , List , 23 , Ten , Home , Staff , 0k , Fik , 0k , 13 , Test , Immunity , Single , Schools , Extra Search Testing , Pupils , Families , Reall Build , Teachers , Bud , Ye , 54 , News , Presence , Waste Water , Southwark , Restrictions , Nicola Sturgeon , Easing , Yet Scotland S , Typing , All Of Us , Some , Changes , Restriction , Lorna Gordon , Stay , Glasgow , Number , Place , Data , Case Numbers , Direction , April 26 , 26 , Lockdown , Route Map , Transformative Change , Friends , Family , Recreation , Four , Children , Households , Course , Addition , 12 , Council Area , Meeting , Group Numbers , Politician , Distance , Point Of View , Aaain , Easing Forward , Message , Stuff , Bsi , Nothing , It S Interesting , Election Campaign , Fine Line , Middle , Fact , Tread , Path , Saw Hairdressers , Reality , Kids , Garden Centres , School , Figure , Point , Hospitality , Basis , Gyms , Process , Spaces , Figures , Cross Border Travel , Alcohol , Pub Trade , Variance , Cards , International Travel , Nation , Price , Longer , Lyra Mckee , Riot , Hearing , Londonderry , Northern Ireland , Violence , Things , Politicians , Tension , Parts , Officers , Evidence , Trial , Community Leaders , Death , Charges , Frustration , Men , 90 , Peace , UÉ Rioting , Governments , Trading Rules , Partner , Irish , Sara Canning , Church Leaders , Brexit , Eu , Reaction , Talking , Ida , Actuall , Protocol , Unionists , Sea , Particle , Rotor , Border , Connection , Interest , Side , I Interest , Scaremongering , As , It Up , Voting , Unionist , Or Loyalist Community , Nationalists , Command , Enough , Fear , Republican , Sides , Creating A Culture Of Fear , Rhetoric , Dbacks , Culture Of Fear , Tie , Similarities , Life , Lyra , Riotin , Intelligence , Houses , Reason , Firearms , Estate , Culture , Tensions , Riots , Spark , Rights , Export , Explosives , Simmering , Rights Arejust , Talk , Unity , Loyalists , Majority , Background , Majority , L Sara , Ma Ority , Situation , Nationalist , Frustrated , Eye , Twitter , Few , Itjust , Way , Area , Republicans , Agreement , Dividends , Kind , Conflict , Fighting , Troubles , Return , Hasn T Been L , Fiuuhtin , Appetite , Histo , Apples , Minorities , Eitherside , Irish Sea , More , Responsibility , Do Ou Return , Border Town , 30 , Foundation , Sort , The Union , Led , Dup , 100 , Position , Sea Border , Customs , Bin , Faith , Quote , Couple , Question , Road , Authority , Answer , Cive , Gm , Circumstances , Businesses , The Have , Division , Word , Yeah Ii Mean , Sea Division Down , House Of Commons , Camera , Northern Ireland Secretary , Duty , Boris Johnson , It Ithink , Brandon Lewis , Duty Of Care , Robabl Johnson , Faces , Show Theirfaces , Visit , Promises , People Don T Have State In And , Words , Funeral , S Funeral , Theresa May , Ou , Credence , Prime Faith , Words , Duties , Notjust , We Haven T , Kid Gloves , Don T Know , Backstop , Deals , Options , Line , Suggestion , Resolution , Communities , Fir Britishness , Possiblyjust , Table , Protocolwork , Go On , Protocol Work , Culture Britishness , Making The Protocolwork , Makin , Ira , Killing , Organisation , Guns , People Who Weren T , Demographics , Most , Writing , Babies , Y , Unionist Community , Pity , Stories , Each Other S Culture , Want , Victories , Grooming , Fed , Shaping A Peaceful And Prosperous Society For , Prospect , Public Sector , Uvf , Work , Something , Statement , Commons , Difference , Arrest , Cash , Right , Cross , Thank Ou , Disorder , Areas , West Belfast , Interface Area , Interface , Escalation , Carrickfergus , Newton Abbot , Cookstown , Escalation Cookstown , Ballymena , Piece , Result , Attack , Total , Wall , 88 , Police Officers , Violent Disorder , Individuals , Wishes , Arrests , Incidence , 9th , Injured , 9 , 18 , 9th Of April , Incidents , Evenings , People Of Northern Ireland , Destruction , Attacks , Records , Explanation , Coronavirus , Factory , Multifaceted , Uncertainty , Road Map , Perception , Equally , Questions , Concerns , Know , Allegiance , Views , Overlap , Implications , Identity , Strides , Do , Elements , Fragility , Equality Understood , Reconciliation , Back , Traditions , Equality , Understanding , Sectors , Good Friday Agreement , Progress , Importance , Integrated Education , Social Development , Issues , All , Dialogue , Society , Education , Feature , Row , Incumbent , Discourse , Support Northern Ireland , Opportunities , In Discourse , Mr , Policing , Deputy Speaker , Executive , Matters , Policing And Justice , Deputy Opportunities , Justice , Matter , Role , Riot Police , Party Leaders , Northern Support , Police Service Of Northern Ireland , Supportm , Play , Priority , Northern Ireland Executive , Public Safety , Itself , 12th Of April , 0 , Executive Parties , Gratitude , Statements , Support , Efforts , Bio , Law And Order , Law Violence , Safe , People Safe , Iexoress , Calm , Rule Of Law , Manner , 10th Of April , Achievement , Of , Co Guarantors , Prosperity , Opportunity , Speaker , Vibrant , Stability , Initiatives , Aren T , Range , Programmes , Wide , Civic Society , Future , Inclusive , Hand , House Is , Prosperous , Deputy , Stakeholders , Engagement , View , Lead , Regard , Secretary , Example , Differences , Secretary Of State , Leaders , Community Workers , Sense , Workers , Ground , Witness , Deep , Sense Of , Restore , I Futures , Leadership , Youngsters , Unjustifiable , Disregard , Monthsi , Sickening Disregard , Sickening , Anger , I Paramilitaries , Deep Bobby Story Funeral , Factors , Lashing , Bobby Police , Bobby Story Funeral Police , Bobby Story Police , Paramilitaries , Complex , Anger In , Disruptive , Loyalist , Building , Prime Minister May , Prime Minister Building , Deep Sense Bobby Story Funeral , Hurt , Ignored , Barriers , Instability , Separation , Unionistj Community , Deal , Brexit Deal , Instability Community , We Community , Separation Sea , Deal Border , Trust , I Roots , John Major , Loss , Tony Blair , Partnership , Labour , Member , Conservative , Momo Ireland , Rebel , Skipton , Labour Member , Momo , Paramount , Ia , Observer , Northem Talks , Minister , Events , Co Guarantor , Northern Minister , Restore Minister , He Isi Northern Ireland , He Northern Ireland , I Northern Ireland , Casual , Solutions , Planning , Parties , Political Parties , Talks , Planning Secretary Of State , Politicalagreement , To Belfast , Betfast , Strategy , Representatives , Grievances , Toss , Show , Northern Representatives , The Unionist , Northern Iretand , Negotiations , Cheques , Decisions , Requirements , Detail , Being , Politics , Closing , Put Northern Ireland , Peace Closing , The Word , Attainment , Profound Deprivation , Coincidence , Activity , Paramilitary Activity , Paramilitary Educational Attainment , Promise , Combination , Deprivation , Them , Deep Disillusionment , High , Toxic , L Paramilitary , Hasi , Andl , Urge , Northern Carriage , Socialjustice , Carriage , Where , Walks Hand In With Social Reconciliation , Reconciliation Walks Hand In , I Reconciliation Walks , We Saw , Reconciliation Urge For The Future Where Walks , Deep Ur E , Afterthought , Renewal , Northern Irelandi , Potiticat Belfast , Peace Attowed , Commitment , Vacuum , Principles , Consequences , Actions , Demands , Our , Condemnation , Leadership Communities , Social Fabric Structure Issues , Out For , Psi , Delivery , Shared View On , Failure , 1998 , Comments , Benefit , Issue , Partners , Impact , Decision , Article , Protocols , Vice President , Times , Business Leaders , Three , Determination , Bodies , The Business Community , Irish Sea Post Brexit , Covid Rules Haven T , Response , Shadow Minister , Attention , Reasons , What , Journalist , Sarah Canning , Listening , Room Key , Points , Your , Louise Hague , Commons , Nail , Government Failing , Ones , Plate , Rest , Level , Someone , Doing , Worry , Rioting Happening , Trigger , Streets , Nobody , Arms , Back Essentiall , Petrol Bombs , Interface Areas , Lire , Potential , Weapons , Patience , Review , David Cameron , Scope , Finance Firm , Investigation , Primus , Reign , Inquiry , Greensill Capital , Rampant Cronyism , Lawyer , Company , Access , Schemes , Employer , A Lawyer , Westminster , Parliament , Health Secretary , Drink , Lots , Officials , Business , App , Social Meeting Organised By , Behaviour , Pattern , It Way , Cronyism , Correspondence , Wav , Normal Wa , E Mails , Contract , Awarding , Directions , Business Secretary , Servants , Greenhill , Text Messages , Loans , There J , Cameron Didn T , Companies , Wasn T , Owners , Bank Which , Cameron Didn T Lobby You , Liberty Steel , Lobbying , Phone Call , Department , Lessons , David , Art , Mps , Vote , Jonathan Blake , Review Isn T Enough , Details , Cell , Capital , Calls , Look , Letup , Attempts , Downing Street , Supply Chain Finance , Finance , Lobb , H , Sco E , Chain Finance , Carte Blanche , Say , Method , Provision , Credit , Focus On Green Cell Capital , Bills , Behalf , It Doesn T , Pressure , Attempt , Night , Flight , Practice , At Westminster , George Floyd , Taser , City , Shooting , Police Officer , Crowds , Protesters , Gun , Murdering Another , Suspect , Police Killing , Peter Bowes , City On Edge , Daunte Wright , Officer , Offence , Warrant , 20 , Intention , Bodycam Footage , Mistake , Belief , Police Chief , Bullet , Presidentjoe Biden , Footage , Video , Bodycam , Face , Criticism , Release , Transparency , Swift , Looting , Justification , Accident , Spain , Peaceful Protest , Trauma , Environment , Notjustify , Jury , Derek Chauvin , Stages , George , Mother , Brother , Mom , May 25th , May 24th , On May 30th , 25 , 24 , May 30th , Lawyers , Security Members , Case , Guard , Courthouse , Los Angeles , Emotions , Lifestyles , Research , Commission , Emissions , Cars , Third , Growth , Sustainability , Property , Cambridge , 1990 , 2015 , Five , Pollution , Many , Growing , Nations , Sunshine , Flying , Flyers , Roger Harrabin , Reports , Flight Data , Class , Tax , Privacy , Authors , 5 , 1 , Policies , Targets , Share , Measures , Carbon Budget , Paris , Climate , Gulf , Poor , Heating Gases , Take Britain S Offshore Wind Farms , Change , Report , Energy , Population , Half , Technology , Wind Farm , Producing Clean Energy , 3000 , 40 , 17 , 17th Of May , Eight , April 15th , 0 00009 , 46 6 , 2020 , 0 4 , A Million , 17th May , , 8 , 40000 , 2014 , 19 , 4 , Seven , 2019 , 28 , 1993 , 911 , 22 , 1051 , 11 , 34 , 1991 , 2019 Involving , 134 , 59 , 1334 , 216 160 , 62019 , 11109 , 1426 , 11126 , 1409 , 115 , April 26th , 110 , 27 , May 25th 2020 , 320 , 330 , May 26 2020 , 1054 , October 14 , 14 , 1055 ,