hello. this is bbc news with shaun ley. we'll be taking a look at tomorrow morning's papers in a moment. first, the headlines. shame on you! the head of the met police says she does not intend to resign and welcomes a review into the police�*s handling of last night's vigil for sarah everard. but criticism of the police has been swift from across the political spectrum and those who attended the vigil. including the mayer of london. authorities in the republic of ireland recommend temporarily suspending use of the astrazeneca vaccine, after a report of four new cases of blood clotting incidents in adults who'd had the jab in norway. the foreign secretary makes another call for the immediate release of british—iranian nazanin zaghari—ratcliffe, after she faces fresh allegations of anti—government propaganda in court. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are the former pensions minister ros altmann, and the independent�*s business commentatorjames moore. they have had a little longer to look at some of the front pages. we will bring you up—to—date with those. mostly what we looked at in the previous review. "i'm going nowhere" — that's on the front of the metro, as the chief of the met police defies calls for her to resign following clashes between police and women at a vigil for sarah everard last night. the guardian has the same story, alongside an image of protesters in parliament square sunday, expressing their anger at the police response to the clapham common vigil. the mail's headline is the "shaming of the met", reporting on the public backlash over the police�*s handling of the event. the telegraph carries the same lead but also reports that close allies of the prime minister say he accepts it was a mistake to delay the start of the first national coronavirus lockdown. "british spirit beating covid" — that's the headline on the express as the uk reports its lowest daily death toll from the virus since mid—october. and a northern transport hub is to be set up in yorkshire, according to the yorkshire post, with hundreds of civil service jobs to be moved out of the capital. let's begin, james, with you. we will start, if we may, with the front of the daily mail. a pretty graphic photograph. a terrifically effective summary of why this door is proving to be so corrosive. the photograph _ is proving to be so corrosive. tue: photograph says is proving to be so corrosive. tte: photograph says it all. it tells the story brilliantly. it has been used really well on this front page. it's very striking that the mail has taken this line, it is a very law and order paper, and has a very female readership. it is the mark of a good newspaper editor to be in touch with your readership, to have yourfinger touch with your readership, to have your finger on touch with your readership, to have yourfinger on the pulse. the mail has decided its readership is going to be very cross about the scenes we have seen, about male police officers manhandling women. i think they are right to be, frankly. what they are right to be, frankly. what do ou they are right to be, frankly. what do you make _ they are right to be, frankly. what do you make of — they are right to be, frankly. what do you make of the _ they are right to be, frankly. what do you make of the front - they are right to be, frankly. what do you make of the front page, if we are talking about images, ros, in the times? it is a more dignified picture all around, really, the times? it is a more dignified picture allaround, really, but quite a powerful one. the houses of parliament behind, the place where the law was passed which it said you can't have these assemblies while a pandemic is taking place. and almost in defiance of —— in defiance of that, a separate vigil on sunday evening with everyone holding up candles, and a sign saying, end violence against women. find candles, and a sign saying, end violence against women. and that is a bi issue violence against women. and that is a big issue at _ violence against women. and that is a big issue at the _ violence against women. and that is a big issue at the moment. - violence against women. and that is a big issue at the moment. in - a big issue at the moment. in parliament tomorrow, there will be a new bill_ parliament tomorrow, there will be a new bill going through, being debated, to try and discuss what strategy— debated, to try and discuss what strategy there should be for violence _ strategy there should be for violence against women and girls, and the _ violence against women and girls, and the prime minister is also going to he _ and the prime minister is also going to be chairing his crime and justice chart_ to be chairing his crime and justice chart league task force. so we have a lot going — chart league task force. so we have a lot going on at the moment in parliament trying to improve protection for women. the public need _ protection for women. the public need confidence restored so that women _ need confidence restored so that women feel confident to go out on the streets and feel the country is being _ the streets and feel the country is being policed well enough to ensure their safety. it�*s being policed well enough to ensure their safety-— their safety. it's interesting, isn't it, james, _ their safety. it's interesting, isn't it, james, that - their safety. it's interesting, isn't it, james, that we - their safety. it's interesting, isn't it, james, that we havej their safety. it's interesting, - isn't it, james, that we have almost unanimity. i don't know if it tells us something about the newspaper readership. i think you were saying the mail has, for example, the fe newspaper has been well established as part of the newspaper for many years. we have the time describing dame cressida as being defiant. another image of women protesters in parliament square. and we have that word in the guardian, please being a disgrace, so is the woman patsy stevenson who we see pinned on the ground. —— says the woman. there is not much neutral coverage, never mind pro police coverage. t not much neutral coverage, never mind pro police coverage.- mind pro police coverage. i think it's a reflection _ mind pro police coverage. i think it's a reflection of— mind pro police coverage. i think it's a reflection of the _ mind pro police coverage. i think it's a reflection of the pictures. l it's a reflection of the pictures. just how wrong this has gone and has been handled. the met hasn't done itself any favours. if you look at the statements that have come out of the statements that have come out of the met during the day. there was one a deputy police commissioner put their name to, it was tweeted today. it seems to be saying, well, you put us in this position, pointing the finger at the protesters. and if you look down the twitter feed, a lot of people say, well, that is what an abuser say, they say, it's your full, you made me do this. itjust looked all wrong. that is why you do have across—the—board condemnation. have across—the—boa rd condemnation. have across—the—board condemnation. —— they say, it's your fault, you made me do this. -- they say, it's your fault, you made me do this.— -- they say, it's your fault, you made me do this. you mentioned the prime minister _ made me do this. you mentioned the prime minister hosting _ made me do this. you mentioned the prime minister hosting this _ made me do this. you mentioned the prime minister hosting this meeting i prime minister hosting this meeting tomorrow to talk about violence against women. it was something theresa may was passionate and committed to when she was in government. there is also a debate about new powers for the police to restrict demonstrations, and what might be regarded as an unlawful demonstration at the moment, although very inconvenient for people, gluing yourself to the side of the train and all the rest of it, some people say, well, that's not very nice but it is what lawful protest is about. you have to be able to be disrupted, you have to accept the consequences in terms of being prosecuted and all the rest of it, but presumably these events are likely to colour that's significantly in parliament? they are, and significantly in parliament? they are. and the _ significantly in parliament? they are, and the police _ significantly in parliament? they are, and the police crime - significantly in parliament? they are, and the police crime and sentencing bill was due to be debated _ sentencing bill was due to be debated in parliament tomorrow anyway — debated in parliament tomorrow anyway. what is now happening is it will he _ anyway. what is now happening is it will he in _ anyway. what is now happening is it will he in a — anyway. what is now happening is it will be in a very, very volatile environment. there are clearly big issues _ environment. there are clearly big issues over— environment. there are clearly big issues over the past year, human rights, _ issues over the past year, human rights, rights of ordinary citizens have _ rights, rights of ordinary citizens have been— rights, rights of ordinary citizens have been under attack, if you like. because _ have been under attack, if you like. because of— have been under attack, if you like. because of the pandemic. there has been an— because of the pandemic. there has been an avalanche of unprecedented measures— been an avalanche of unprecedented measures which have taken away people's— measures which have taken away people's freedoms. and this bill tomorrow— people's freedoms. and this bill tomorrow will actually potentially remove _ tomorrow will actually potentially remove the existing rights for free protest _ remove the existing rights for free protest. and that comes in the context— protest. and that comes in the context of— protest. and that comes in the context of what happened on saturday night, _ context of what happened on saturday night, when, as we know, there was a protest _ night, when, as we know, there was a protest it— night, when, as we know, there was a protest it was— night, when, as we know, there was a protest. it was not meant to go ahead. _ protest. it was not meant to go ahead. the — protest. it was not meant to go ahead. the organisers had decided it wouldn't _ ahead. the organisers had decided it wouldn't go — ahead. the organisers had decided it wouldn't go ahead. but the police were _ wouldn't go ahead. but the police were left — wouldn't go ahead. but the police were left to try and deal with the puhlic— were left to try and deal with the public order consequences. and i must _ public order consequences. and i must say— public order consequences. and i must say i — public order consequences. and i must say i feel sorry for cressida dick~ _ must say i feel sorry for cressida dick~ she — must say i feel sorry for cressida dick~ she is _ must say i feel sorry for cressida dick. she is the first female leader of the _ dick. she is the first female leader of the metropolitan police. this is an issue _ of the metropolitan police. this is an issue that i'm sure she feels passionately about. but i do think there _ passionately about. but i do think there are — passionately about. but i do think there are questions, serious questions _ there are questions, serious questions to be asked and answered, when _ questions to be asked and answered, when a _ questions to be asked and answered, when a protest goes ahead, which is apparently— when a protest goes ahead, which is apparently against the law, and certainly— apparently against the law, and certainly the police seemed to believe — certainly the police seemed to believe it was against the law. when people _ believe it was against the law. when people were getting too close, and that is— people were getting too close, and that is against the current rules, and when — that is against the current rules, and when there is a stay at home advice. _ and when there is a stay at home advice, which again, in this country. _ advice, which again, in this country, you don't expect to see that at— country, you don't expect to see that at all. — country, you don't expect to see that at all. it puts everyone in a very— that at all. it puts everyone in a very difficult position. can that at all. it puts everyone in a very difficult position.— very difficult position. can i ursue very difficult position. can i pursue the _ very difficult position. can i pursue the point _ very difficult position. can i pursue the point about - very difficult position. role of _ serious concerns about, what is the role of a _ serious concerns about, what is the role of a democratic government to interfere _ role of a democratic government to interfere with people's right to freedom — interfere with people's right to freedom of expression? their right to protest— freedom of expression? their right to protest if they are concerned about _ to protest if they are concerned about something they feel has gone terribly— about something they feel has gone terribly wrong? if you squash that ability _ terribly wrong? if you squash that ability for— terribly wrong? if you squash that ability for people to make their views— ability for people to make their views publicly known, then you change — views publicly known, then you change the nature of our democracy. and i_ change the nature of our democracy. and i don't— change the nature of our democracy. and i don't think that should be done _ and i don't think that should be done lightly. i think there is an awful— done lightly. i think there is an awful lot — done lightly. i think there is an awful lot of disquiet in parliament about— awful lot of disquiet in parliament about some of these measures. ros, thank ou. about some of these measures. ros, thank you- let's _ about some of these measures. ros, thank you. let's move _ about some of these measures. ros, thank you. let's move on _ about some of these measures. tr" thank you. let's move on to the telegraph. james, this is an interesting story for the government. an admission, the lockdown delay was a lethal mistake, the pm's allies admit. tt is lockdown delay was a lethal mistake, the pm's allies admit.— the pm's allies admit. it is the first time _ the pm's allies admit. it is the first time we _ the pm's allies admit. it is the first time we have _ the pm's allies admit. it is the first time we have seen - the pm's allies admit. it is the i first time we have seen anything like this coming from anywhere close to number ten. the telegraph is, as newspapers go, perhaps the most supportive of borisjohnson, of all the papers. so it's interesting that it is here. this is the sort of thing you often see as clearing the ground for a later statement. i notice there is not anything for number ten officially in there, it is all sort of friends of the prime minister say this, allies say that, without putting any names to them. there is also a certain amount of qualification. chris whitty is mentioned as potentially taking some flak. so is patrick balance. but it's still striking that this seems to be clearing the way for the prime minister to say something in future, if not now. we minister to say something in future, if not now. ~ ., ., ., ., if not now. we are going to leave what is perhaps _ if not now. we are going to leave what is perhaps one _ if not now. we are going to leave what is perhaps one of _ if not now. we are going to leave what is perhaps one of the - if not now. we are going to leave what is perhaps one of the most| what is perhaps one of the most unexpected photographs on the front of the telegraph tomorrow, which is jemima bega, in a detention camp in syria, sporting a rather lovely pair of sunglasses. —— shamima begum. the so—called jihadis bride, who is contesting having her nationality removed. let's talk about the yorkshire post story, a fascinating story. we will leave aside the northern transport hub in yorkshire. inaudible. what do you make of this story? inaudible. what do ou make of this sto ? , what do you make of this story? this is one of a series of accusations that— is one of a series of accusations that some — is one of a series of accusations that some of the money being spent to rebuild _ that some of the money being spent to rebuild the north, the levelling up to rebuild the north, the levelling up agenda, the new towns fund is this particular one. {3.6 billion being _ this particular one. {3.6 billion being set— this particular one. {3.6 billion being set aside to try to revive towns. — being set aside to try to revive towns, and clearly we need to do that _ towns, and clearly we need to do that but — towns, and clearly we need to do that. but there are accusations that the money— that. but there are accusations that the money is being too much directed to marginal— the money is being too much directed to marginal seats that the conservatives wanted to win. 0r had already— conservatives wanted to win. 0r had already won. it's very difficult to know _ already won. it's very difficult to know what — already won. it's very difficult to know what is going on here, and i think— know what is going on here, and i think some — know what is going on here, and i think some kind of independent revlew— think some kind of independent review might well be called for, at some _ review might well be called for, at some point. because clearly we have towns _ some point. because clearly we have towns that— some point. because clearly we have towns that need rebuilding. stockbridge, an old steel town, it needs— stockbridge, an old steel town, it needs a _ stockbridge, an old steel town, it needs a makeover. lots of these towns _ needs a makeover. lots of these towns have — needs a makeover. lots of these towns have been neglected for so long _ towns have been neglected for so long. with the pandemic, it could -et long. with the pandemic, it could get even — long. with the pandemic, it could get even worse.— long. with the pandemic, it could get even worse. james, the quote from mark— get even worse. james, the quote from mark drakeford, _ get even worse. james, the quote from mark drakeford, the - get even worse. james, the quotej from mark drakeford, the election success in 2019, he said that is what secured the fund. he is very candid, he thinks it was a political judgment. candid, he thinks it was a political 'udrment. , ., , ., , judgment. very honest. i am pleased to see his honesty, _ judgment. very honest. i am pleased to see his honesty, because - judgment. very honest. i am pleased to see his honesty, because i - judgment. very honest. i am pleased to see his honesty, because i was - to see his honesty, because i was born in stockbridge. laughter.