Up like total chaos but these guys step up in the moment and did what few would do and put their own lives in harms way. And the American Woman who says she was brought to britain to have sex with Prince Andrew urges the public to stand beside her. Well havejonny dymond to explain what this latest Development Means for the royal family. And coming up well speak to someone live in the Pacific Island nation of samoa, where a measles outbreak, is causing serious concern. Global climate talks have opened in madrid. Negotiators from almost 200 countries will talk for two weeks. Their headline goal is Carbon Neutrality by 2050 but the big question is how. Right now, the world is far from on track. This is the message from the un secretary general. There is no time and no reason to delay, we have the tools, the science and the resources. We also have the political will that people demand from us. To do anything less will be a betrayal of our entire humanfamily will be a betrayal of our entire human family for generations to come. Without the full engagements, all our efforts will be undermined. China and the us are the two biggest emitters. Together they account for more than 40 of the global total of greenhouse gases. We know donald trump pulled the us out of the Paris Climate Accord of 2015 and he isnt attending this summit. There is a us delegation though, republicans opted out of being part of it. Nancy pelosi, speaker of the house of representatives, senior democrat, opted to go. We are here to say to all of you, on behalf of the half of representatives in the United States, we a re representatives in the United States, we are still in it. At the house of representatives. This graph shows three scenarios if the world does nothing, if we stick with current policies or if promises made by countries which signed the paris climate ows three scenarios they implement paris, the world would still warm by almost 3 degrees celcius above pre industrial levels by the end of this century. This graphs shows what needs to be done to reach the 2030 emissions target agreed in paris. Back in 2010, we had to reduce emissions by 3. 3 each year to reach that goal. Now, to do the same, itll take almost 8 each year. And if we wait another 5 years, thatll go up to more than 15 . The longer we go on, the more drastic the action required. Science editor David Shukman has more from the conference in madrid. 0ver over the years these massive events havent always worked to a coherent outcome. Because it is so complicated there are so many different parallel cracks of negotiations. There are the formal ones that take place amongst the teams of delegates from all different countries, assisted by the un and other experts and then you have informal talks, slightly outside the process and that is sometimes where the biggest breakthroughs are going to come if they are going to come at all. All they are going to come at all. All the time, you have various leaders of all the countries, some here, others back in their capitals, communicating to see if they can do any kind of deal. It is incredibly difficult to keep across it if you area difficult to keep across it if you are a reporter but also if you are at the centre of it all in the un, trying to understand how to advance things forward. The effect, the result, it is always that any steps that had ta ken result, it is always that any steps that had taken a pretty small. Im wondering what it is like in the middle because of from the outside looking in the language is so stark from the un, climate scientists about the wells failure to respond adequately to this challenge. Inside the bubble, is there a despondency . I think there is. There is a growing frustration. I have detected over yea rs of frustration. I have detected over years of reporting on these events and a growing openness, a desire to be outspoken on the failings of the process. It was really stunning to interview the un secretary general last night and to hear him being extremely blunt about the failings of the process, the failure of the world to respond to what the scientists basically say is blindingly obvious and also to point out that some of the biggest emitters around the world, i think he had in mind china and other countries in asia, obviously america as well, are still investing in coal, still burning coal, the dirtiest of the fossil fuels and he has urged them not to build any more coal fire power stations as of next year but as he himself concedes, there is still a very long list of construction plans for exactly those kind of power stations so i think he recognises that despite everything he and others have been saying about this topic for years, there is still a massive uphill struggle and one very clear indicator of that is that the graph of emissions, greenhouse gases, that are heating up the planet, that graph is still going up and not down. We will have further comments from madrid a little bit later in the programme. Memorials have been held today for the two People Killed in fridays London Bridge terror attack. We stand in silence once more following the atrocity on London Bridge last friday. 0ur city, vibrant and alive yet threatened with death. Let us keep silent and remember. The victims were named over the weekend as jack merritt and saskia jones. They were both graduates of the university of cambridge, and were attending an event for the universitys learning together programme, which focuses on education within the criminalJustice System. Saskia jones was 23. She had recently completed a masters degree in criminology and had applied for a Police Graduate recruitment programme. She aimed to specialise in victim support. Heres what one of her former tutors has said today. She was outstanding. She stood out. She was outstanding. She stood out. She always are, i dont know if you when you are at university and you ask a question and the room is silent, she was always the first person to have something to say and it started the discussions. She started all of the discussions. She would disagree and she would disagree because she had evidence to disagree because she had evidence to disagree with people in the room. She stood up for her own values will stop she was funny, she had so many friends. Everybody loved her. Jack merritt was 25 and also studied criminology. He was the course co ordinator for the learning together programme. Bryonn bain worked with mr merritt and was at fishmongers hall on friday. He was brave in his own regard. He was the first line of defence, he was the first line of defence, he was the first person to confront him at the door. He was inspiring. He had a bright light in his eyes and he was a young kid but he was a cambridge grad so he could have been anywhere, done anything with his elite education, his privileged education and he chose to spend most of the last day of his life. In a statement, jack meritts family said we knowjack would not want this terrible, isolated incident to be used as a pretext by the government for introducing even more draconian sentences on prisoners, orfor detaining people in prison for longer than necessary. But this story has rapidly become politicised. Heres a piece borisjohnson wrote for the daily mail over the weekend it promised an end for automatic Early Release for terrorists. And here he is speaking to andrew marr on the bbc yesterday. I think this whole system of automatic Early Release which was brought in by labour, it was under that system. 0nly been in office. The leader of the conservative party has been in powerfor ten years. The leader of the conservative party has been in power for ten years. The reason. Has been in power for ten years. The reason. 0ne has been in power for ten years. The reason. One reason has been in power for ten years. The reason. One reason we are having the selection, we need to get brexit done so that we can move forward. I think it is ridiculous, i think it is repulsive that individuals as dangerous as this man should be allowed out after serving only eight yea rs allowed out after serving only eight years and that is why we are going to change the law. A few things to correct, parliament didnt block the plan, it had. The Prime Minister said first of all, the queens speech was actually passed by parliament in october. Given this was a rare parliamentary victory for the Prime Minister, its a surprise he got that wrong. Weve heard there that the previous Labour Government was responsible for that automatic Early Release law that saw the attacker leave prison after eight years. The reality is much more complicated. Susana mendonca explains. In 2008 the criminaljustice and immigration act allowed offenders to leave. In 2012, usman khan pleaded guilty to a terror offence and was handed and indeterminate prison sentence which was to be a minimum of eight years. A law passed scrapping indeterminate sentences and reintroduced extended sentences of ten years of more. In 2013, the court of appeal ruled that usman khans sentence should be substituted for a 16 year fixed term of which he should serve half in prison amounting to eight years. Well, thejustice secretary Robert Buckland says he will review the conditions of convicted terrorists released from prison. This is from earlier. Ido i do think we just need to pause and get the tone of this debate right but Public Protection has to be at the heart of any government and i have to put that first and foremost when considering festival existing offenders and secondly the future sentencing regime for terrorism. The government has said 7a other people whove been convicted of terrorist offences are being scrutinised. One man, who was jailed with the London Bridge attacker in 2012, has already been arrested. Well labour has also made this story political. Heres Jeremy Corbyn speaking yesterday. The war on terror has manifestly failed. Britains repeated military interventions in north africa and the wider middle east, including afghanistan have exacerbated rather than resolved the problems. Corbyn has also highlighted cuts to the Justice System during the conservative led governments of the past nine years. Hes calling for an examination of how Prison Services and sentencing for terrorism offences work. Here he is speaking on sky news. I think it depends on the circumstances, it depends on the sentence but crucially depends on what they have done. Not necessarily, then . Not necessarily, no. I think there has to be an examination of how our Prison Services work and crucially what happens when someone is released from prison because i need to know whether or not the parole board were involved in his release. Apparently they were not and made that statement quite quickly. Heres iain watson. Is it reasonable to say that Neither Party were focused on this issue until friday . I dont think thats entirely the case but what surprised people was the speed in which the Prime Minister pointed to some of those policies that he had in the immediate wake of the attack because if you remember after the attack in 2017, the terrorist incident then, campaigning was suspended and both sides were a bit nervous when they should breach that suspension and come back to full campaigning. In 2016, during the referendum when the labourmp 2016, during the referendum when the labour mp was murdered, there was a suspension of campaigning. In the second interview of the night, after the incident had taken place, he pointed the finger at labour going back to 2008. They responded and talked about the cuts over nine yea rs talked about the cuts over nine years to a coalition or conservative led government. Whether. The conservative government made a very clear it was going to end Early Release for prisoners across the board, violent prisoners. In fact, for terrorists, Early Release had already been stopped back in 2013. Borisjohnson also said today that he was very much involved in a campaignfor he was very much involved in a campaign for longer sentences for quite some time including his time as london mayor. Looking back at his ma nifesto to as london mayor. Looking back at his manifesto to be london mayor in 2012 and he did talk about longer sentences for people involved in Gang Violence for example but he didnt raise at that time automatic Early Release as a particular issue soi Early Release as a particular issue so i think mostly the break with tradition on politics has been the swiftness with which these issues we re swiftness with which these issues were raised following the deaths of two people in a terrorist incident rather than the fact that the parties didnt have policies in their books to reverse cuts in labours case and in the case of the government a long track record of talking tough on sentencing. Thank you, im sure will speak to you through the week. Stay with us on 0utside source still to come. The American Woman who says she was brought to britain aged 17 to have sex with Prince Andrew urges the public to stand beside her. Priice andrew denies it ever happened. A Murder Investigation has begun after a 12 year old boy was killed in a hit and run. Essex police say the incident happened in loughton and occured just as pupils were leaving debden park high school. The 12 year old pupil from the school was not the only casualty, as our correspondent tolu adeoye explains. We know that five others were injured. Their injuries are not thought to be life threatening. I spoke to someone who was here who lives in the local area who was down here on the scene quite quickly who talks about people helping those who we re talks about people helping those who were injured, they were taken to hospital. We are not sure of their conditions at this stage. The police has been appealing to witnesses, they say the driver. They are asking for information on a silver ford ka with the damage likely to be on the front. They are asking for anyone with a dash cam footage or information to get in touch as soon as possible. This is 0utside source live from the bbc newsroom. 0ur lead story is . Experts warn that Climate Change is at the point of no return. An American Woman who says she was brought to britain aged 17 to have sex with Prince Andrew is urging the public to stand beside her. I implore the people in the uk to stand up beside me, to help me fight this fight, to not accept this as being 0k. This fight, to not accept this as being ok. This is not some sort of sex story, this is a story of being trafficked. He asked me to dance. He is the most hideous dancer i have ever seen in my life. It was horrible and this guy was sweating all over me, it was basically raining over me. I knew i had to keep him happy because that was what would have been expected from me. Now that interview with ms giuffre was recorded before Prince Andrew sat down with the Bbcs Newsnight program where he categorically denied any sexual contact with the then 17 year old. She was very specific about that night and dancing with you and profusely sweating. There is a slight problem with the sweating because i have a peculiar medical condition which is that i dont sweat, or i didnt sweat at the time because i had suffered what i would describe as an overdose of adrenaline in the war and it was almost impossible for me to sweat. Bbc royal correspondent, jonny dymond. She makes this plea, she makes this plea and she says i implore the british people to stand by my side. Effectively asking people here in britain to take her side rather than the side of a Senior Member of the royalfamily which is pretty extraordinary of itself. Leave aside whether or not he sweats when he dances or whether he is dry as a bone, it is horrific because what the royal family, what Prince Andrew would have hoped was, when he stood back from public life which he did after that car crash of an interview that he gave the bbc a few weeks ago, when he stood back, this would begin to die away but the fact is there are still allegations, there is Virginia Giuffre who was very vocal and only too happy to be vocal on tv and this controversy doesnt go away. Instead, it grows and gets worse. She wants the british people to stand beside her but in terms of the Legal Process that is playing out in the us, what does she and her lawyers want to happen . There isnt much of an active Legal Process that we know about. There is not much sitting around in the courts. Their lawyers have repeatedly called for Prince Andrew to give a sworn deposition. There are a number of civil cases going on. There is not much in the criminal cases that we know of but there are civil cases and they have asked for a sworn deposition. Prince making andrew has said that he will speak to the appropriate Law Enforcement agencies and it is not clear whether or not he would speak to lawyers whom he may see as expeditions so we wait to see what happens there but at the same time we are waiting for a huge cache of legal papers in an epstein related case which are being fought over by lawyers in new york, we are waiting to see what of thos