Obviously, this is a verdict which we will respect, in charge and i think, going forward, who do you trust . I know, and we respect the judicial process. John, you have very strong opinions on this today. What do you make of i have to say, i strongly disagree the ruling . It is concerning that with what the justices have found. The ruling . It is concerning that the Prime Minister has felt like he i dont think that its right. Can get away with something so clearly unlawful. It is good it has and i invite borisjohnson, been proven unlawful. Because i get in the historic words, to consider his position. Parliament has its opinions, that cheering may be something that the prime mp5 will now return minister is getting in the way of to Parliament Tomorrow morning the process of brexit, but silencing at 11 30am and get back to work. Them is not the way about it, especially when you preach i have instructed the house democracy, which i get as an authorities to prepare not for the recall the prorogation argument. But it is genuinely was unlawful and is void difficult. Where do we go from here now . We are in a stalemate. Because to prepare for the resumption of the business of the house of commons. Parliament is not really an agreement on. Most of parliament doesnt want to leave, but we have a mandate that says we should leave. It is very, very difficult. The process. Thank you, sam. Ithink definitely that is the question, why do we go from here . From here, ben brown outside the Supreme Court. A very warm welcome to westminster. Borisjohnson is flying back to london from new york tonight that is becky wood getting reaction after the Supreme Court ruling live at stoke on trent. You rejoin that his decision to suspend parliament for five weeks, in the run up to the brexit deadline, us live at stoke on trent. You rejoin us at the Supreme Court in london, was unlawful and void. Highest court in the United Kingdom, the decision was unanimous, and is a crushing defeat for both the government which has just returned a and the Prime Minister. Sensational and extraordinary all 11 judges concluded that the governments course of action was designed judgment, all 11 Supreme Court to frustrate mp5 and lords from carrying out their justices unanimous in their decision constitutional duties. That borisjohnson, the speaker of the house of commons says preparations justices unanimous in their decision that Boris Johnson, prime justices unanimous in their decision that borisjohnson, Prime Minister, acted unlawfully when he advised. Are under way for mp5 to return to Parliament Tomorrow morning. Borisjohnson has said he disagrees with the ruling, and there should now be an election. The queen to Prorogue Parliament. Richard lister has our first report on the days proceedings and the the queen to Prorogue Parliament. The effect on the fundamentals of reaction outside the Supreme Court. Democracy was extreme, said lady the rain may have muted the brexit protests outside court but this was always going to be a day hale, immediately the prorogation, of reckoning for both sides. Suspension of parliament is null and inside, thejustices had to weigh up void, mps are free to go and resume conflicting judgments on whether the suspension their seats in parliament and the of parliament was done legally. Lords as well. Lets listen to what this was their unanimous verdict. Lady howe said in that unanimous judgment returned here at the the decision to advise her majesty Supreme Court. To Prorogue Parliament was unlawful this prolonged suspension of because it had the effect parliamentary democracy took place in quite exceptional circumstances. Of frustrating or preventing the fundamental change that was due to take place in the constitution the ability of parliament to carry of the United Kingdom out its constitutional functions on the 31st of october. Parliament and in particular without reasonable justification. The house of commons as the elected representatives of the people has a right to a voice in how that echoed the judgment that change comes about. By the court of session in edinburgh, which said the Prime Minister intended to stymie parliamentary scrutiny of his brexit plans. The high court in london had said judges shouldnt weigh in on such political questions, but the Supreme Courtjustices the effect on the fundamentals of our democracy was extreme. Said that was wrong. No justification for taking action the courts have exercised with such an extreme effect has been put before the court. A supervisory jurisdiction over the lawfulness of acts of the government for centuries. As long ago as 1611, the court held that, the court is bound to conclude, the king, who was then therefore, that the decision the government, has no prerogative to advise her majesty to Prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it but that which the law had the effect of frustrating of the land allows him. Or preventing the ability this case, she said, of parliament to carry was about defining the limits out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification. Of Prime Ministerial power and Parliament Must always be able to exercise its authority over government. In the words of lord bingham, senior law lord, quote, the conduct of government by a Prime Minister and cabinet lady hale, president of the supreme collectively responsible court. Most legal commentators had and accountable to parliament lies at the heart of been expecting a splitjudgment, in westminster democracy. Other words a minority dissenting this is not a standard judgment as well, but that was not the case. As soon as she said, lady or normal prorogation. Hell, this was unanimous, that took when parliament was prorogued two legal commentators by surprise. Weeks ago, the speaker lets have a listen to the edge of made his feelings clear and the Supreme Court agreed herjudgment returned lets have a listen to the edge of her judgment returned a lets have a listen to the edge of herjudgment returned a short time with that sentiment today. Ago. This court has already although mp5 filed out as requested, the courtsjudgment concluded that the Prime Ministers was that they had no need advised to her majesty was unlawful, to because borisjohnsons advice to the queen was unlawful. Void and of no effect. This means that the order in council to which when the Royal Commissioners walked it lacked was also unlawful, void into the house of lords and of no effect and should be it was as if they had walked in with a blank sheet of paper. Quashed. This means when the royal the prorogation was also void and of no effect. Commission has walked into the House Parliament has not been prorogued. Of lords, it was as if they had walked in with a blank sheet of the court said it was now up paper. The prorogation was also void to parliamentarians to decide how and of no effect. Parliament has not and when to resume the session. Been prorogued. Lady hale president for the businesswoman who has battled for years to give parliament its say on brexit, this was a landmark moment. The ruling today speaks volumes. Of the Supreme Court. Immediately, Political Action as you would this Prime Minister must open expect, some here at the supreme the doors of Parliament Tomorrow. Court, but also at the labour party mp5 must get back and be brave and bold in holding this conference, Jeremy Corbyn gave this unscrupulous government to account. Reaction. Thank you. It demonstrates a contempt for democracy and an abuse of power by him. The High Court Said this applause. Was a judgment on the boundaries the Supreme Court, therefore, of government power, passes the baton to the speaker not on brexit, but many in the uk to reCall Parliament. Will see those two issues as one and the same. I will be in touch immediately richard lister, bbc news. To demand that parliament is recalled so that we can question the Prime Minister. Cheering and applause. The commons speaker, john bercow, has welcomed the ruling demand that he obeys the law that and says mp5 will return to the commons tomorrow morning. Labours leader, Jeremy Corbyn, and other Opposition Party leaders, has been passed by parliament have called on borisjohnson to consider his position. Jonathan blake reports now and recognise that our parliament on the political reaction is elected by our people to this mornings decision. To hold our government to account. A Labour Government would want joy, surprise, maybe disbelief to be held to account, at the Supreme Court ruling, we wouldnt bypass democracy. Which was as clear as it could have been. A unanimous decision that the Prime Minister had acted unlawfully. The highest court in the United Kingdom has unanimously found that his advice to prorogue this parliament, his advice given to her majesty the queen, we also got reaction from john was unlawful, his position untenable and he should have the guts to do cherry of the Scottish National the decent thing and resign. Party, one of the original challenge the court ruled the decision is the court of session in to Prorogue Parliament prevented it from doing its job without good edinburgh. From the steps of the reason, vindication for those who had argued that all along. Supreme court, joanna cherry was delighted with the ruling. As regards to mr Boris Johnson, i think the scale of this victory the highest court in for us and defeat for Boris Johnson the United Kingdom has unanimously is beyond what anyone expected. Found that his advice to prorogue this parliament, i think its right that advice given to her majesty he considers his position. The queen, was unlawful. His position is untenable. I dont think we can carry on with a Prime Minister who has and he should have the guts for once effectively been shown to have lied to do the decent thing and resign. On such a major issue. Parliament isnt suspended. Cheering. Effectively it is still sitting and the sooner we get back into that chamber the better. When do you think mps should reconvene . The Prime Minister accepted immediately, or as soon as possible. The decision, but said that the legal issues that led to it many of us are here already. The holding of this undemocratic were an attempt to stop brexit. Minority tory government to account must take precedence above all else. I strongly disagree with this decision of the Supreme Court. I respect the judiciary. I dont think this was the right decision. I think that the prorogation joanna cherry there from the has been used for centuries without this kind of challenge. Scottish National Party outside the its perfectly usual Supreme Court. Norman smith, clive. To have a queens speech. Thats what we want to do. When you have the judgment, on a more importantly, lets be in no scale of one to ten, how surprised doubt, there are a lot of people are you . About 12. 5. I think who want to frustrate brexit. There are a lot of people eve ryo ne who basically want to stop this are you . About 12. 5. I think everyone thought this was going to country coming out of the eu, bea everyone thought this was going to be a split decision so the fact it and we have a parliament is unanimous and so strong, i have that is unable to be prorogued, that just been looking at the full does not want to have an election, judgment. Let me read. Borisjohnson and i think it is time reading thisjudgment, we took things forward. Judgment. Let me read. Borisjohnson reading this judgment, every at the labour conference paragraph is going to sting and hurt. Paragraph 61, you are going to in brighton, Jeremy Corbyn made the most of the moment with an unscheduled appearance. Have to on coral your toes. Lady the Supreme Court therefore passes hale said it is impossible for us to the baton to the speaker to reCall Parliament. Include on the evidence put before us include on the evidence put before us there was any reason, let alone a i will be in touch immediately to demand that Parliament Good reason, to advise her majesty is recalled so that we can question to Prorogue Parliament for five weeks. That is the business i am in, the Prime Minister. Other Opposition Party used to decoding judicial speak. The leaders were quick to call for the Prime Minister to resign. Court declined to go down the route he has acted unlawfully in trying of improper purpose, improper motive to silence parliament, trying to silence the voices of the people, because he doesnt that Boris Johnson of improper purpose, improper motive that borisjohnson deliberately want to be held to account. Missed by the queen. But if you read he doesnt want to have that paragraph, you are left in no to answer questions doubt as to what these 11 justices about his disastrous brexit policy. Thought of the advice that he gave to the queen. That is really damning in doing so, he was prepared to mislead the queen and damaging. We will talk about the and the whole country. Political effect of that, but as far as thejudges go, a Prime Minister with any honour political effect of that, but as far as the judges go, without going down would tender his resignation in the light of this judgment. The proper motive, in castigating hes been found to have acted the proper motive, in castigating the Prime Minister. And making it unlawfully for no good reason clear what they think about his and to have a Prime Minister continue in office in integrity. Norman, some of boris the circumstances is unthinkable. Johnsons supporters have been chatting, we love you boris, we do. Mp5 needed no encouragement to return to the commons some took their seats within minutes a tricky die . It is not tricky, it of the ruling. The speaker never shy of stating is catastrophic. One that raises parliament is sovereign said it questions about the survival of his should be back in business tomorrow. Government and Brexit Strategy. We in the light of that explicit have had every single opposition leader. Have had every single opposition leader. We have had every single opposition leader. We are going to college judgment, i have instructed green, the speaker of the house, john bercow. I am not sure i need the house authorities to prepare not for the recall the prorogation was unlawful and is void this. He is under an umbrella. We to prepare for the resumption are expecting comments about what of the business of the house of commons. Mps should do now on a wet college at a stroke, the Supreme Court decision has stopped green outside parliament. John the government in its tracks and left the Prime Ministerfirst frustrated by parliament bercow, speaker of the house. Just and now constrained by the courts. Lining up the press there. Obviously jonathan blake, very important to hear from lining up the press there. Obviously very important to hearfrom him. Bbc news, westminster. What he will say about recalling parliament and the mechanics of when two weeks after packing up the parliament and the mechanics of when parliament gets back to business in the wake of this judgment. Parliament gets back to business in the wake of thisjudgment. Good stage, we are back on the grass. Afternoon. I welcome the judgment this morning of the Supreme Court. Our political correspondent, jessica parker, joins me now. Presumably the mp5 will be back. Yes, a lot of them are travelling up thatjudgment this morning of the Supreme Court. That judgment is unanimous, back from across the uk and perhaps this morning of the Supreme Court. Thatjudgment is unanimous, that judgment is unambiguous. And that further abroad, before 11 30am tomorrow. It is not being recalled, it is resuming, because we have judgment is unambiguous. And that judgment is unambiguous. And that judgment is unqualified. As you all learned from the Supreme Court today iiow that it was never really prorogued, judgment is unqualified. As you all now know, that judgment judgment is unqualified. As you all now know, thatjudgment is that the prorogation was unlawful. The judgment is unqualified. As you all now know, that judgment is that the prorogation of parliament was question now is, what are mp5 going unlawful. Unlawful because it to do tomorrow when they return to the house of commons . A number of options are being talked about. Prevented or frustrated parliament there have been calls for Boris Johnson to resign. He has made it clear that he doesnt think he will be doing that. He insists the uk in the discharge of its core duties. And it did so at a crucial time for will leave the eu on the 31st of october, he is sticking to plan a. Could we see a vote of oui and it did so at a crucial time for our country. The citizens of the uk no confidence . There is hesitation of the opposition benches, because they want to hold Boris Johnson feet to the fire and focus on blocking a are entitled to expect that parliament does discharge its core functions, that it is in a position no deal brexit, so the similar narrative we saw before parliament was prorogued. You talked about the to scrutinise the executive, to hold timetabling, it is complex because there is still the Labour Party Conference ongoing in brighton and ministers to account. And to tom watson, the deputy leader, is supposed to speak tomorrow. He will come back here. Then there is the legislate, if it chooses. In the issue of the conservative Party Conference next week. Does that go light of that explicit judgment, i ahead . I rang conservative party this morning and they said they will get back to. I have had no hint that have instructed the house the conference will not go ahead. In authorities to prepare it not for terms of what we know about sitting the recall, the prorogation was days can we know that parliament will sit tomorrow and thursday stop unlawful and is void, to prepare for you usually get a business statement the resumption of the business of on thursday, the business of the the resumption of the business of house of commons was to perhaps you the house of commons. Specifically, will get more detail on when i have instructed the House Parliament will be sitting, and how authorities to undertake such steps that will interrupt conference as are necessary to ensure that the season. It will be a pretty bizarre house of commons sits tomorrow and event if the conference does go ahead, Boris Johnson is that it does so at 11 30am. I have event if the conference does go ahead, borisjohnson is under huge pressure, conservative mp5 are pretty tight lipped, because they are bemused by what has happened. Contacted party leaders, and where some are saying they are sticking by borisjohnson, but that has not been possible senior some are saying they are sticking by Boris Johnson, but there some are saying they are sticking by borisjohnson, but there is some nervousness about what was said and what was talked about in the supreme representatives of Political Court today. Nicola sturgeon this parties, in order to inform them of morning said, if borisjohnson wont my thinking and to prepare the way do the decent thing and resign, then the only option is to force him out for the house of commons to do its of office. She is sort of putting Jeremy Corbyn on the spot, that he work. Owing to notification has to call a vote of no confidence. Will do that . We will have to wait requirements, with which i am sure you are all closely familiar, it and see. You might come under pressure, and i know that the will not be possible for there to be various opposition parties are a Prime Ministers questions speaking this afternoon as to what to do or stop he might come under tomorrow. However, for the avoidance pressure from some of the other of doubt, there will be. For urgent parties not to go for that vote of no confidence because they think they have got borisjohnson in a questions for ministerial bind. They want to try and force borisjohnson to ask statements, and for applications for bind. They want to try and force Boris Johnson to ask for the bind. They want to try and force borisjohnson to ask for the delay he will not ask for, and that will make it more difficult for him in the event of a snap election. 0k, the event of a snap election. Ok, thank you. We will go to the un emergency debates under standing General Assembly because donald order number 24. Colleagues, trump is speaking. Emergency debates under Standing Order number24. Colleagues, i emergency debates under Standing Order number 24. Colleagues, i thank you for your interest and i hope you where i stand, the world has heard will agree that the position is from president s and premiers at the clear and unmistakable. Good height of the cold war. We have seen afternoon. The foundation of nations. We have sojohn bercow 50 john bercow there, sojohn bercow there, the house of seen the ringleaders of revolution. Commons speaker, just saying that thejudgment of commons speaker, just saying that the judgment of the Supreme Court we have beheld saints who inspired judge uses justices, they said us with hope, rebels who stirred us with passion, and heroes who emboldened us with courage, all here unqualified, john bercow welcome that, he has spoke to the house authorities so that comments will to share plans, proposals, visions and ideas on the worlds biggest sit from 11 30am tomorrow. There will be no Prime Minister never my stage. Like those who met us before, questions but plenty of scope for urgent questions. One imagines mps from all parties will be preparing ourtime is stage. Like those who met us before, our time is one of great contests, to reconvene at Parliament Tomorrow. High stakes and clear choices. The 11 30am is the time they have been essential divide that runs all told that session will sit. If you arejust around the world and throughout told that session will sit. If you are just joining history is once again thrown into told that session will sit. If you arejustjoining us, we have got an extraordinaryjudgment here arejustjoining us, we have got an stark relief. It is the divide extraordinary judgment here from arejustjoining us, we have got an extraordinaryjudgment here from the Supreme Court, that borisjohnson did act unlawfully. We have a couple between those whose thirst for of mps to talk so quickly about control deludes them into thinking they are destined to rule over that. What is your reaction, ben. Others. And those people and nations who want only to rule themselves. I unprecedented in our history, have the immense privilege of addressing you today as the elected deliberately breaking the law, not leader of a nation that prizes just misleading the queen. He should liberty, independence and resign immediately, he will not, Self Government above all. The parliament will take control of the brexit mess tomorrow and sorted out United States, after having spent for the benefit of our country. Tom, what will parliament do now . Quite a over 2. 5 trillion since my election to rebuild our great military, is also by far the world pot most lot of activity to kick off with. Powerful nation. Hopefully itll whether the Prime Minister is in never have to use this power. Contempt of parliament for not releasing the full documents, and americans know that in a world where prorogation documents. Make sure he others seek conquest and domination, is forced to secure an extension if our nation must be strong in wealth, he does not secure a deal and i Hope Parliament will want to work on the in might and in spirit. That is why proposal of what he comes back with, the United States vigorously defends it should be put to a peoples put the United States vigorously defends the traditions and customs that have ina referendum. Made us who we are, like my beloved it should be put to a peoples put in a referendum. Where you survive but were you surprised by the judgment from the Supreme Court, ben country, each nation represented in this whole has a cherished history, bradshaw . I was not surprised, i culture and heritage that is worth came back in how the expectation that they would rule against the defending and celebrating, and which government. I was surprised by the clarity and forcefulness that the gives us our singular potential and judges felt against the prime strength. The free world must minister who has shown he has embrace its national foundations. It prepared to ride roughshod over our must not attempt to raise them or constitutional norms, our democracy, and bringing the queen into a replace them. Looking around, and constitutional crisis. These judges have saved our democracy, in my opinion. We have to discuss the all over, this large and magnificent colla pse opinion. We have to discuss the collapse of thomas cook, devastating for thousands, the misleading by planet, the truth is plain to see. Another government minister who if you want freedom, take pride in broke the law to send arms to saudi arabia. We need to be getting back, your country or stop if you want democracy, hold onto your sovereignty. If you want peace, love away from the supposed enforced your nation. Wise leaders always put holiday. Boris johnson says he respects the law and the judiciary. The good of their own people and he is in new york, we have not heard their own country first. The future from him. What would you expect him to say . I would expect him to does not belong to globalists, the future belongs to patriots, the concede that he has acted unlawfully, unfit to be our prime future belongs to patriots, the future belongs to sovereign and minister. He will have to come back independent nations who protect to parliament, we will have a chance their citizens, respect their to parliament, we will have a chance to hold him to account. We will ask why he gave the advice knowing it neighbours and on other differences that make each Country Special and was why he gave the advice knowing it was unlawful. It perhaps spells a short term of office for our prime unique. It is why we in the united minister. Who, frankly, i dont think its up to the job. Was this in the end to a miscalculation by states have embarked on an exciting downing street, do you think . Lots programme of National Renewal, and of people are blaming Dominic Cummings, mrjohnson double chief everything we do, we are focused on strategist, for proroguing parliament in the first place. You empowering the dreams and cant blame the people youre point aspirations of our citizens, thanks for Something Like this. The Prime Minister and cabinet should be held equally culpable for this, they to our progrowth economic policies, didnt even ask for the full legal our domestic Unemployment Rate reached its lowest level in over advice before they signed off this half a century. Fuelled by massive illegal prorogation. They are all responsible. Yes, Dominic Cummings most of all, but dont let the tax cuts and regulations cuts, jobs are being produced at an historic others off the hook. We are hearing Jeremy Corbyn, ben bradshaw, it is being brought forward, the rate. 6 billion americans have been added 6 million americans have conference speech, this afternoon. been employed in under three years. Dont think it is possible because last month, african american, you have to give three days notice toa you have to give three days notice to a Prime Ministerfor Prime Ministers questions. It is hispanic american and Asian American important we all get back from unemployment reached the lowest wherever you are in the world. The rates ever recorded. We are justices are saying this is not marshalling our nations vast energy about brexit, not about how or when abundance and the United States is we leave the European Union. This is now another one producer of oil and just about the prorogation. Many natural gas anywhere in the world. People will say there are implication. I think the court is wages are rising, incomes are right to not make that link but i soaring and 2. 5 million americans think what parliament now has to do have been lifted out of poverty in is make sure that we do resolve the less than three years. As we rebuild brexit issue. I think the only way to do that quickly, and we need to the unrivalled might of the american stop something that has damaged the country for the last three years, is to agree we are going to have a military, we are also revitalising our alliances by making it clear referendum on Boris Johnson to agree we are going to have a that all of our partners are referendum on borisjohnson 22 f we expected to pay their fair share of he secures one, referendum on borisjohnson 22 f we he schres one, or referendum on borisjohnson 22 f we he secures one, or theresa mays the tremendous defence burden which if he doesnt. Whether people want to stay in the European Union or the tremendous defence burden which the United States has born in the not. We need to do this, the only past. At the centre of our vision way to resolve it, because the country is wasting its time and for National Renewal is an ambitious money on brexit, which will cause long term damage. Campaign to reform International Money on brexit, which will cause longterm damage. Thank you for being with us outside the Supreme Court. Earlier, ispoke trade. For decades, the being with us outside the Supreme Court. Earlier, i spoke to gina miller, the businesswoman who International Trading system has originally brought the case at the been easily exploited by Nations High Court in london, was u nsuccessful high court in london, was unsuccessful there, appealed here acting in very bad faith, asjobs and was successful. She gave me her reaction to the unanimous judgment from the Supreme Court, that boris we re acting in very bad faith, asjobs were outsourced, a small handful johnson had acted unlawfully in grew wealthy at the expense of the advising the queen to suspend parliament. Middle class. In america, the result ijust had to press forward with what was 4. 2 million lost manufacturing i believed was right, which was holding the Prime Minister and the government to account. Jobs and 15 trillion in trade there was very little guarantee we would win this, so it a momentous win. Deficits. Over the last quarter the you say you had to press forward, we know from what you have said before, that because of from your campaigning in the courts, you have had death United States is now taking that threats at times, you have needed bodyguards. Decisive action to address this at what personal cost grave economic injustice. Our goal has all this come . Is simple, we want balanced trade thatis is simple, we want balanced trade that is both fair and reciprocal. We things that are easy to win are easy. Things that are have worked closely without partners important and the right in mexico and canada to replace thing to do tend to come at a cost. But from my point of view, it is nafta with the brand new and a cost worth paying because this hopefully bipartisan us mexico is about ensuring that our parliament, canada agreement. Tomorrow, i will our representatives, are not shut down. I would do anything to make join the Prime Minister ofjapan in sure that was defended. Finalising a new trade deal. As the gina miller talking at their own. Lets get more reaction from ian United Kingdom makes preparations to exit the European Union, i have made clear that we stand ready to blackford, deputy leader of the s p. Complete an exceptional new trade agreement with the uk that will did you see this coming . We bring tremendous benefits to both of helped. Did you expect it . I did our countries. We are working not. This is an earthquake. Mike closely with Prime Minister boris sand p. Johnson on a magnificent new trade deal. The most important difference not. This is an earthquake. Mike s and p. No legal authority, the Prime Ministerfor the s and p. No legal authority, the in americas new approach on trade Prime Minister for the prorogation of parliament. Snp. We need to concerns our relationship with make sure that we bring across to china. In 2001, china was admitted the premise that he has to take to the World Trade Organisation. Our responsibility for what he has done. Quite simply given that he has shut leaders then argued that this decision would compel china to them parliament, he stopped our voices being heard at a time of liberalise its economy and constitutional crisis. I think he strengthen protections to provide has shown disregard for Parliament Since he has been elected as parameter, he ought to do the things that were unacceptable to us, reasonable thing and resign, not just of the spot he has threatened to break the wall over the act and for private property and for the rule of law. Two decades later, this passed preventing us from leaving theory has been tested and proven completely wrong. Not only has china without a deal. He has talked about declined to adopt promised reforms, us without a deal. He has talked about us being accomplices with europe against the interests of the uk. It has embraced an economic model this man does not show he has what dependent on massive market it takes, has the dignity to be primacy. Now he has done something barriers, heavy state subsidies, unlawful. He does not have a mandate currency manipulation, product from the people of the united dumping, forced Technology Transfers kingdom, he should do the honourable, right and decent thing and the theft of intellectual and resign. People would say, you property, and also trade secrets on would say that, you are a political opponent. Of course, he will not a grand scale. Asjust one example, resign. He ought to, and if he does andi resign. He ought to, and if he does and i would say to the opposition, we have to do ourjob. This is a man i recently met the ceo of a terrific prepared to stop at nothing. That is what has been demonstrated. We have american company, micron technology, to stop him. The way we do that is at the white house. Micron produces come together and have a vote of no memory chips used in countless confidence to remove him from power. If he does not go, Parliament House to re m ove electronics, to advance the chinese if he does not go, Parliament House to remove Boris Johnson if he does not go, Parliament House to remove borisjohnson as Prime Minister. Parliament is sitting tomorrow, john bercow we saw on the government pot five year plan, a green outside saying it will resume company known by the Chinese State sitting from 11 30am. What do you allegedly stole microns designs, think should be first order of valued at up to 8. 7 billion. Soon business . We know we face a challenge in so much as we passed a law to stop us leaving the european the Chinese Company obtains patterns union. We have to take our for a nearly identical product, and responsibilities to make sure he cannot wiggle out of that. We have micron was banned from selling its to hold him to account for what he own goods in china. But we are has done here, why did he act without authority to shut parliament down . We need to hold him to account, many other things we need seeking justice. The United States lost 60,000 factories after china to discuss. Quite simply, i think we have to make sure we make it absolutely Crystal Clear we are not entered the wto. This is happening leaving the European Union on a no deal this marriage witness it. Make sure the mechanisms are put in to other countries all over the place, then we need to have an globe. The World Trade Organisation election as quickly as possible. Needs drastic change. The second lets re m ove largest economy in the world should not be permitted to declare itself a election as quickly as possible. Lets remove leaving the European Union on a no deal basis. We can developing country in order to gain the system at others expense. For hear from union on a no deal basis. We can hearfrom liberal union on a no deal basis. We can hear from liberal democrat leader joe swenson. Jo swinson. Years, these abuses were tolerated, ignored or even encouraged. Hear from liberal democrat leader joe swenson. Jo swinson. This unanimous judgment from the joe swenson. Jo swinson. This unanimousjudgment from the Supreme Court makes it clear borisjohnson globalism exerted a religious poll is not fit to be primacy. He has acted unlawfully in trying to over pa st globalism exerted a religious poll over past leaders, causing them to silence parliament, silenced the ignore their own National Interests. Voices of the people because he does but as far as america is concerned, not want to be held to account, he those days are over. To confront does not want to answer questions about his disastrous brexit policy. These unfair practices, i placed and in doing so, he was prepared to mislead the queen and indeed to massive tariffs on more than 500 mislead the queen and indeed to mislead the queen and indeed to mislead the whole country. He is not fit for office, he should resign. Billion of chinese made goods. Parliament must sitting. That is jo already, as a result of these tariffs, supply chains are swinson, leader of the liberal relocating back to america and to democrat party, talking a short time other nations, and billions of ago with her reaction. We talk now dollars are being paid to our to the labour backbencher stephen kinnock, who is in brighton at the Party Conference. What do you make treasury. The American People are of this extraordinary judgment from absolutely committed to restoring balance to our relationship with 11 Supreme Court justices . Of this extraordinary judgment from 11 Supreme Courtjustices . It is unanimous, unequivocal, it could not china. Hopefully we can reach an agreement that would be beneficial be clearer. The Prime Minister has for both countries but, as i have ridden roughshod over the constitution, he needs to apologise made very clear, i will not accept a to the british people for what he has done. We need parliament to be bad deal for the American People. As sitting, as it will be tomorrow from 1130. I think that is good, i think we endeavour to stabilise our we should table an urgent question relationship, we are also carefully for the brexit secretary to come to monitoring the situation in hong parliament and explain what the government is going to do now, first kong. The world fully expects that to ensure we take no deal off the the Chinese Government will honour table and then i think we need as its binding treaty made with the opposition parties to have a serious discussion about tabling a vote of british and registered with the United Nations in which china no confidence. A lot of people have commits to protect hong kongs been having their say about boris freedom, legal system and democratic johnson. Plenty of his opponents say ways of life. How china chooses to he should resign over this, do you handle the situation will say a agree . I would agree with that but great deal about its role in the it is not going to happen. We have world in the future. We are all seen borisjohnson it is not going to happen. We have seen Boris Johnson is it is not going to happen. We have seen borisjohnson is utterly reckless and ready to ride counting on the president as a great roughshod. He will squat in number ten downing st, i think. We have to leader. The United States does not ta ke ten downing st, i think. We have to take matters into our own hands and seek conflict with any other nation. Parliament. The first step of that is get us back on the green benches, we desire peace, cooperation and where we should be holding this mutual gain with all. But i will government to account and showing that the institution of Parliament Never fail to defend americas is where we can defend our democracy from those trying to ride roughshod interests. One of the greatest over it and abused the trust of the security threats facing peace loving british people. And indeed mislead the queen. Many people were not nations today is the repressive regime in iran. The regimes record expecting this judgment, they thought if it did go against the government it would not be as strong of death and destruction is as this. Were you surprised by the well known to us all. Not only are strength of the words of lady hale, the president of the Supreme Court . They the number 1 state sponsor of 0f the president of the Supreme Court . Of the law is generally a nuanced terrorism, but they are fuelling the wars in syria and yemen. At the same thing, but what is absolutely clear here is that the government is bang to rights. It was always a very time, the regime is squandering the nations wealth and future on a flimsy excuse, i think there was fanatical quest for Nuclear Weapons outrage across the country when they tried to pretend they needed more and the means to deliver them. We time to prepare the queens speech. Must never allow this to happen. To it is honestly an insult to the intelligence of the british people. Iamjust intelligence of the british people. I am just frankly amazed they did stop irans path to Nuclear Weapons not work through this and realise it could end up in this way, in the and missiles, iwithdrew stop irans path to Nuclear Weapons and missiles, i withdrew the stop irans path to Nuclear Weapons and missiles, iwithdrew the United States from the terrible iran Supreme Court. Its not only shows they are ready to abuse our nuclear deal, which has very little democracy, it also shows they are utterly incompetent and not fit to time remaining, did not allow govern. Are a lot of people are inspection of important sites and saying the labour party isnt being did not cover ballistic missiles. Very competent at the moment with his rather tortured position on brexit and the way all that voting following our withdrawal, we have happened yesterday. You are at the Party Conference, what was your implemented severe economic sanctions on the country, hoping to reaction to all of that . Party Conference, what was your reaction to all of that . I think that we should have stayed clear free itself from sanctions, the regime has escalated its violent and with 2017 position, respect the result of the referendum but leave unprovoked aggression. In response with a deal. We have unfortunately to irans recent attack on saudi got into it concerted position on brexit and that has left the arabia, oil facilities, we electorate confused, there are to irans recent attack on saudi arabia, oilfacilities, we impose the highest level of sanctions on somewhat chaotic scenes in the Irans Central Bank and wealth fund. Conference hall and they did not help yesterday. Quite frankly, the story of the day is the fact that we all nations have a duty to act. No have a government that is prepared to abuse the basic principles, norms responsible government should subsidise irans bloodlust. As long and conventions of democratic politics. We cannot stand for this, we will not stand for this, parliament will be recalled tomorrow as irans menacing behaviour and we will show, loud and clear, continues, sanctions will not be that we are not going to allow a lifted. They will be tightened. Prime minister who is ready to abuse irans leaders will have turned a parliament and mislead the queen to proud nation intojust another continue in the way that he is. The number one priority must also be to cautionary tale of what happens when ta ke number one priority must also be to take no deal off the table, meaning a ruling class abandons its people ensuring we do get the extension and embarks on a crusade for that we need from the summit in brussels. But i think we should use personal power and riches. For 40 that time to negotiate very seriously to get the deal that the years, the world has listened to country needs, to get over the line irans rulers as they lash out at of brexit so that we can finally ta ke of brexit so that we can finally take politics back to the bread and butter issues that were everyone else for the problems that used to talk about, health, they alone have created. They education, jobs, policing, the future of our children. Those are conduct ritual chance of death to the things the british people really wa nt to the things the british people really want to talk about, lets get this mess cleared up and move on. As america and traffic in monstrous things stand, we have a government standing in the way of us doing that. Parliament is to be reconvene anti semitism. Last year, the tomorrow and we need to get our countrys Supreme Leader stated democracy working again. Are 0k, israel is a malignant cancerous stephen kinnock, thank you for your tumour that has to be removed and time. Well, thats the situation eradicated. It is possible and it here at the Supreme Court, the Supreme Courtjustices, will happen. America will never here at the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court justices, all 11 here at the Supreme Court, the Supreme Courtjustices, all 11 of them, have ruled the Prime Minister acted unlawfully when he suspended parliament. Parliament, we have tolerate such fanatical heard from the speaker, will resume sitting tomorrow morning. From anti semitism. They have used hatred of israel to detract from their own 11 30am, uk time. I think we can show you the scene there and failures. Thankfully, there is a parliament now. The speaker said the growing recognition in the wider decision from the judges, the justices had been unambiguous. And middle east that the countries of the region share common interests in from tomorrow morning at 1130 mp5 battling extremism and unleashing can get back to business. Parliament economic opportunity. That is why it will reopen. You have been watching is so important to have full special cold fridge, goodbye to normalised relations between israel viewers on bbc one. Coverage. And its neighbours. Only a relationship built on common interests, Mutual Respect and religious tolerance can forge a better future. Irans citizens many issues to consider. Not least deserve a government that cares what happens to the Prime Minister, what happens to the Prime Minister, what is his reaction. We can go to new york and join james about reducing poverty, ending what is his reaction. We can go to new york and joinjames landale, corruption and increasing jobs, not Diplomatic Correspondent. James, i stealing the money to fund and suppose mrjohnson, i understand it massacre abroad and at home. After was 5 30am your time. We are in the four decades of failure, it is time for irans leaders to step forward city of borisjohnsons both, he and to stop threatening other finds himself with his team closeted countries and focus on building up together, working out what reaction together, working out what reaction their own country. It is time for to get. He is working out practical decisions and substantive ones, does he go home . He has a full schedule irans leaders to finally put the of to do at the United Nations. By iranians people first. America is my count, he has at least seven ready to embrace friendship with all meetings with other heads of who genuinely seek peace and government, notjust with President Trump but also the president of iran and various other european leaders. Respect. Many of americas closest he is also scheduled to give his friends to date once our greatest first ever address to the un general foes. The United States has never assembly as Prime Minister. These believed in permanent enemies was are not small matters. He has to balance that as to whether or not he not we want partners, not adversaries. America knows that has to rush. There are also the while anyone can make war, only the optics of this, does he add to the sense of panic or say, no, the most courageous can choose peace. Business of government carries on . He will stay here, continue his for this same reason we have pursued business and return home as he was diplomacy on the korean peninsula. I scheduled to tomorrow. Practical have told kim jong un what i truly decisions as well as of the village obviously fundamental decisions of how the government response to believe, that like iran his country the substance of the ruling by the court this morning. Last night, number ten were briefing not to expect an immediate response, they is full of tremendous untapped would take time to digest it, simply potential but to realise that because they did not know what the promise north korea must ruling would be. I doubt they anticipated entirely this was what denuclearise. Around the world our the outcome was going to be. I message is clear. Americas goal is imagine they might give some holding position, we are expecting something shortly before a more substantive response later. A pretty difficult harmony and americas goal is not to time for a Prime Minister to be out of the country thousands of miles go with endless wars, wars that never ends. With that goal in mind, away, when you have what one of our commentators described as an my administration is also pursuing earthquake here at the Supreme Court. There is form for that, we all remember Margaret Thatcher going the hope of a Brighter Future in to the summit in paris in the middle of the leadership contest that many afghanistan. Unfortunately the thought was a mistaken decision, she taliban has chosen to continue their should have stayed back in london to savage attacks. We will continue to rally support. Obviously this is not a direct parallel but this is an work with our coalition of afghan irony of whatever Prime Ministers partners to stamp out terrorism and are abroad, there is always the risk we will never stop working to make something happens in terms of your own domestic politics. That is the peace of reality here in the western situation borisjohnson own domestic politics. That is the situation Boris Johnson faces own domestic politics. That is the situation borisjohnson faces now. Hemisphere we are joining with our it isa situation borisjohnson faces now. It is a tough decision, how does he partners to ensure stability and respond . Rush back . Get back into opportunity all across the region. The plane and get back immediately . In that mission one of our most because the speaker has made it clear there will be no Prime Ministers questions tomorrow, that is one thing he doesnt have to come critical challenges is a legal back to. Even if that was the case, Prime Ministers sometimes to miss immigration which undermines prosperity, rips apart societies and Prime Ministers sometimes to miss Prime Ministers sometimes to miss Prime Ministers questions and get empowers ruthless criminal cartels. The deputy to standing, especially if they are abroad on foreign summits. Yes, the logistics, when does he go home . But more mass illegal migration is unfair, fundamentally, how does he respond unsafe and unsustainable for to this . What decisions does he everyone involved. The sending take . Does he talk to the queen . What does he say to the other Party Countries and the depleted countries leaders, his party . All of those become depleted very fast but their things need to be mixed up with the logistics of how you get through all youthis become depleted very fast but their youth is not taken care of and human the mad security and traffic that capital goes to waste. The receiving pretty much trapped everyone in manhattan for one hour or two before countries are overburdened with more they can break free of it. James, migrants than they can responsibly thank you for the moment, james acce pt migrants than they can responsibly accept and the migrants themselves landale, Diplomatic Correspondent at the United Nations. Are exploited, assaulted and abused by vicious coyotes. Nearly one third lets get more reaction to this of women who make the journey north historicjudgment to our border are sexually assaulted lets get more reaction to this historic judgment at the historicjudgment at the Supreme Court. Im daunted byjeremy and along the way yet here in the United States and around the world there is alison. Jeremy, its really hard to overstate how extraordinary this a growing Cottage Industry of judgment is and to fight it was radical activists and unanimous, 11 0 . Non Governmental Organisations that judgment is and to fight it was unanimous, 110 . Absolutely, this is promote human smuggling. These a ground breaking, jaw breaking judgment. We have all followed this groups encourage illegal migration case, the first miller case, and we we re case, the first miller case, and we were all surprised about the result and demand the erasure of national and unanimity of the result. We were borders. Today i have a message for just talking about speak about carl zooming parliament, he is resuming those open border activists who cloa k those open border activists who cloak themselves in the rhetoric of it, not recalling it because prorogation never happened. We heard socialjustice, your policies are that orders are read out by the notjust. Your policies socialjustice, your policies are commissioners in parliament not only not just. Your policies are socialjustice, your policies are notjust. Your policies are cruel and evil. You are empowering was it a proceeding in parliament, but it might as well have been a criminal organisations which prey on blank piece of paper. The prime innocent men, women and children. You put your own. Some virtue before ministers i device was void, he was acting outside the scope of a prime the lives, well being minister, it really does us does not you put your own. Some virtue before the lives, well being of countless innocent people when you undermine get more dramatic than s. Alison, you have talked before about how the Border Security you are undermining human rights and human dignity. Many different justices you have talked before about how the differentjustices had different opinions about when the courts should intervene. Those that make it of the country is here today are even more extraordinary, that they coping with the challenges of should all come together and be uncontrolled migration. Each of you unanimous . Maybe, in a sense, they has the absolute right to protect wa nt to unanimous . Maybe, in a sense, they want to be unanimous because this is your borders and so, of course, does a very political decision, or some our country. Today we must resolve people could see it as straying into to Work Together to end human smuggling and Human Trafficking and the field of politics. Absolutely, i think thats why they wanted to make sure that they had unanimity. They put these criminal networks out of wa nt sure that they had unanimity. They want any judgment sure that they had unanimity. They want anyjudgment to strive for business for good. For our country, unanimity as much as possible. I think what comes across strongly as the court reinforcing that it is ican business for good. For our country, i can tell you sincerely we are their role to protect the working closely with our friends in constitution. They are stressing the importance of a parliamentary the region, including mexico, democracy, that parliament is canada, got similar, honduras, el sovereign, the executive accountable salvador. Four mana. To parliament, parliament is accountable to the people. That is the key principle they are uniting i would like to thank president behind. Lets not forget the Supreme Court is quite a new institution, Lopez Obrador of mexico for the its only a few years old, is all of great cooperation we are receiving and for right now putting thousands of troops on our southern border. This rebalancing our unwritten constitution . Its an amazing sight mexico is showing us Great Respect of the times that our Supreme Court andi mexico is showing us Great Respect and i respect them in return. The is being constantly asked these questions that cross the political, legal boundaries and any sense because it to be something of a us, we have taken very unprecedented Constitutional Court at the moment. I think leacock talked about this in action to stop the flow of illegal thejudgment, really i think leacock talked about this in the judgment, really rebalancing that delicate balance of power immigration. To anyone crossing our between the Supreme Court here and borders illegally, please hear these the house of commons. The implications of that are the public words, do not pay the smugglers, do are going to become more and more not pay the coyotes. Do not put interested in who these justices yourself in danger. Put your are. We already see a lot of debate on social media about who these children in danger because if you people are, what their views are, make it here you will not be allowed who appointed them, how did get all m, make it here you will not be allowed in, you will be promptly returned home, you will not be released into these questions that have formally been confined something to the our country as long as i am president of the United States we corners of legal discussion and academia but is now coming out on will enforce our laws and protect the opening. Not long ago, we had a our borders for all of the countries paper calling somebodys enemies of of the western hemisphere our goal is to help people invest in bright the people who stop to think that would have been a nevertheless by futures of their own nation. Our the Supreme Court justices would have been a nevertheless by the Supreme Courtjustices to come up the Supreme Courtjustices to come up with such a bold and surprising judgment . I think they would have been very cautious to make sure what region is full of such incredible promise, dreams waiting to be built they are doing is definitely about law and not politics. We have had and national destinies for all. They consta nt law and not politics. We have had constant repetition of this and about how, when and if we leave the are waiting also to be pursued European Union. They are looking very clearly. He also had lady hale throughout the hemisphere there are millions of hard working, patriotic explaining this is an unusual set of young people, eager to build, circumstances, she strains it was to innovate and achieve but these do with protecting democracy. They nations cannot reach their potential ifa nations cannot reach their potential looked very carefully at the facts if a generation of youth their and said there was no reasonable abandon homes in search of a life justification for undermining these constitutional principles. I think that shows that they are very elsewhere. We want every nation in conscious, very understanding of our region to flourish and its their proper role. But they will people to thrive in freedom and uphold the constitution and look very carefully at the facts. Thank you forjoining us. We can get more peace. In that mission we are also committed to supporting those people in the western hemisphere who live under brutal repression, such as reaction from jonathan, former head those in cuba and nicaragua and of number Ten Communications under the government of sirjohn major. Of venezuela. According to a recent course, john major was part of these report by the Un Human Rights Council women in venezuelan stand in proceedings, he made a submission line for ten hours a day waiting for saying that borisjohnson had acted unlawfully. Whats your reaction to food. Over 15,000 people have been detained as political prisoners. What the Supreme Courtjudged . Modern day death squads are carrying frankly, im rather surprise, what the Supreme Courtjudged . Frankly, im rathersurprise, i thought there lordships might find out thousands of extrajudicial it difficult to say this was just the stable. But they have done. Im killings. The dictator maduro is a delighted. As you know, i have worked with sirjohn for a long time i know he would have taken this cuban puppet, protected by cuban decision with very great care and bodyguards, hiding from his own concern. Its worth just repeating people. Well cuba wonders what one of your colleagues mentioned, that this is nothing to Venezuelas Oil wealth to sustain do, ina mentioned, that this is nothing to do, in a sense, with brexit this is about the constitution. Im sure its own corrupt communist rule. The United States and our partners have that sirjohn will have taken the built a Historic Coalition of 55 view that defending the constitution is the important thing. Many people countries which recognise the there, i think, is the important thing. Many people there, ithink, whatever our views legitimate government of venezuela. Of brexit, will have said that the to the venezuelans trapped in this way in which borisjohnson has nightmare please note that all of approached the constitution in the america is united behind you. The first few weeks as Prime Minister has been to trample all over it. Now United States has a vast quantities he has found that the Supreme Court of humanitarian aid ready and has actually trampled on him. That waiting to be delivered. We are watching the venezuela situation isa has actually trampled on him. That is a really dramatic state of very closely. We await the day when affairs, and it will causejohnson to think about his own position, i democracy will be restored, when think it is that series. I think we venezuela will be free and when all need to think long and hard liberty will prevail throughout this about the future of our constitution hemisphere. One of the most serious once we have hopefully settled the dust of brexit, because its quite clear that when you start challenges our countries face is the spectre of socialism. It is the interfering with it, you open up a wrecker of nations and destroyer of can of worms. The problem is that we societies. The events in venezuela have seen over the last three years. Remind us all that socialism and this is a vital stage of the process communism are not aboutjustice, they are not about equality, they of protecting our constitution and are not about lifting up the poor democracy. Im not going to apologise if that sounds overblown, and they are certainly not about the i believe it is that series, and i good of the nation. Socialism and believe that the Supreme Court, setting only for the second time as communism are about one thing only, 11 judges, has come to a wise and power for the ruling class. Today i carefully measured decision which gives the opportunity for government repeat a message to the world which to think again. Some ofjohn major i have delivered at home, america will never be a socialist country. Because my critics will say, in the last century socialism and actually, suspending parliament has communism killed 100 million people. Always been done for political motives, its not a big deal. In sadly, as we see in venezuela, the fa ct, motives, its not a big deal. In fact, john major himself did it himself in a 1997 for his own death toll continues in this political ends. If you look into what sirjohn has said about that incident, it was purely a report country. These totalitarian ideologies combined with modern technology have the power to written a long time in advance. If anybody hadnt noticed the issues the conservative party fit about its exercise new and disturbing forms of ethics through its backbenchers, they clearly havent been reading suppression and domination. For this the newspapers over the last few yea rs. The newspapers over the last few years. I dont think that is a charge you can lay at all against reason, the United States is taking steps to better screen phone sirjohn. Rigging is a fairly technology and investment and to straightforward matter if you do protect our data and our security. With it any a straightforward way. Proroguing is a fairly straightforward matter. Whatjohnson we urge every nation present to do the same. Freedom and democracy must has done is stifle parliament, because if you do not prorogue, then be constantly guarded and protected parliamentary committees counted, both abroad and from within. We must decisions can be made. It becomes very straightforward to Call Parliament back. I dont think anybody can say it was necessary for always be sceptical of those who wa nt always be sceptical of those who five weeks, you can argue about the want conformity and control. Even in actual number of sitting days lost. Free nations we see alarming signs back but i think if it walks and quacks like it is a duck, then it is and new challenges to liberty. A probably a duck. We all know that small number of social media platforms are acquiring immense johnson wanted to close options to those that oppose the brexit, and he power over what we can see and over chose that particular route. That is what we are allowed to say. The latest from here at the supreme permanent Political Class is openly court. The historic and dramatic judgment, a politically explosive dismissive and defiant of the will of the people. A faceless judgment, a politically explosive judgment, it has to be said, from the 11 Supreme Court justices, bureaucracy operates in secret and judgment, it has to be said, from the 11 Supreme Courtjustices, led by the president , lady hale, saying weakens democratic rule. Media and that they agreed that parliament had been frustrated and stymied and that academic institutions push flat out assaults on our histories, ought to prorogue it was null and traditions and values. In the united void. The house of commons speaker, states my administration has made john bercow, has said that clear to social Media Companies that parliament will open at 11 30am tomorrow morning. We are staying we will uphold the right of free speech. If free society cannot allow with this ruling of the Supreme Court which has ruled that the prime social media giants to silence the minister was market wise to the queen to suspend parliament for five voices of the people and free people weeks was unlawful. There was a unanimous ruling from the 11 judges must never ever be listed in the who concluded that the government was met course of action was designed to frustrate mps and lords course of silencing, coercing, from carrying out their cancelling or blacklisting their own constitutional functions. The president of the court, lady hale, neighbours. As we defend american means that legally, parliament is values we affirm the right of all not suspended. People to live in dignity. For this reason my administration is working the suspension of parliamentary with other administrations to stop democracy to place and quite extraordinary circumstances. The fundamental change that was due to criminalising homosexuality and we stand in solidarity with lgbt q ta ke fundamental change that was due to take place in the constitution of the United Kingdom was due to take place on the 31st of october. Parliament, and in particular the people who live in countries that house of commons, as the elected punish, jail people based on sexual representatives of the people has the right to a voice in how that orientation. We also championing the change comes about. The effect on role of women in our societies. The fundamentals of our democracy nations that empower women are much was extreme. Nojustification was extreme. No justification for taking action that was such an wealthier, safer and much more extreme effect has been put before the court. The court is bound to sta ble wealthier, safer and much more stable politically. It is therefore vital not only to a nations conclude therefore that the decision to advise her majesty to prorogue prosperity but also it is vital to parliament was unlawful. Because it its National Security to pursue had the effect of fish dating or preventing the ability of parliament womens economic development. Guided to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable by the principles my administration justification. Launched the Global Development and lady hale said the unanimous decision of the 11 justices was that parliament had not prosperity initiative. The wg dp is been prorogued and it was for the first ever governmentwide approach to womens Economic Empowerment and working to ensure that women all over the planet have this court has already concluded that the Prime Ministers advised to the legal right to own and inherit her majesty was unlawful, void and property, work in the same industries as men, travel freely and of no effect. This means that the order in council to watch it lead access credit and institutions. Was also unlawful, void and of no yesterday i was also pleased to host effect and should be quashed. This leaders for a discussion about an means that when the Royal Commission walk into the house of lords, it was as if they had walked in with a ironclad american commitment blank sheet of paper. The protecting religious leaders and prorogation was also void and of no also protecting religious freedom. Effect, parliament has not been this fundamental right is under growing threat around the world. Prorogued. Hard to believe but 80 of the in the past hour, john bercow has worlds population lives in confirmed that mps will return to countries where religious liberty is Parliament Tomorrow morning. In significant danger or even in light of that explicit judgment, completely outlawed. Americans will i have instructed the Health Authorities to prepare, not for the never tyre in our efforts to promote recall, the prorogation was unlawful and is void, to prepare for the freedom in religion. We want to resumption of the business of the support religious liberty for all. House of commons. Americans will also never tire of defending in life. We are aware that a short while ago the shadow attorney many United Nations projects have general Shami Chakrabarti accepted to assert a global rights from the Labour Party Conference in brighton to get her reaction to the ruling. To taxpayer funded abortion on i was always a believer, when i was demand right up to the moment of rising my leader, ialways delivery. Global bureaucrats who i was always a believer, when i was rising my leader, i always believed we would win because we had it right have absolutely no business attacking the sovereignty of nations and the law on my side. But goodness that wish to protect innocent life. Me, lady hale, the president of the Supreme Court, has given an amazing like many nations here today we in america believe that every child, judgment this morning that will be read and remembered up and down born and unborn, is a sacred gift these islands, across the world, for from god. There is no circumstance many years to come. No one is above under which the United States will the law, but even borisjohnson and allow International Entities to his arrogant entitled charms. They trample on the rights of our have been behaving disgracefully, citizens, including the right to been getting away with things all that lies, but today, they have been held to account by the united self defence. That is why this year kingdoms hi scott. I think that is i announced we would never ratify a very positive step. Where does the un arms trade treaty which would this leave the Prime Minister . We threaten the liberties of just heard jeremy according saying that mrjohnson should consider his law abiding american citizens. The United States will always uphold our position. Absolutely. Can you constitutional right to keep and bear arms. We will always uphold our imagine to be called out like that second amendment. The core rights by the highest court in your country, to be called up for and values that america defends shutting down parliament unlawfully . That is the kind of story we are today were inscribed in americas founding documents. Our nations used to hearing from other parts of the world, but not from the united founders understood that there will kingdom. He has behaved like a always be those who believe they are tinpot dictator, and he has been entitled to wield power and control called out today by the highest over others. Tyranny advances under court in these islands, he should be many names and many theories but it thoroughly ashamed of himself. He knows better, he had an elite always comes down to the desire for education, he had every opportunity in life, and he has behaved in the domination. It protects not the most appalling way and has been interests of many but the privilege called out. We teach our kids to of view. Our founders gave us a about the police and to respect the syste m of view. Our founders gave us a system designed to restrain this local magistrates, how will we set an example to people up and down dangerous impulse. They chose to this country if the Prime Minister entrust American Power to those most does not now reflect on being called out by the highest court in the invested in the fate of our nation, land . To be proud and fiercely independent people. The true good of the nation can only be pursued by those who we can all speak to david cox, goc. Love it. By citizens who are rooted thank you forjoining us, what is in its history, who are nourished by your reaction . It is a remarkable its culture, committed to its values, attached to its people and state of affairs. The behaviour of the government in suspending parliament for such a remarkable know that its future is theirs to thing to done. It was always clear build theirs to lose. Liberty is it was politically wrong, not justifiable to do it. We have now that it was unlawful. That is clearly very damaging for the Prime Minister, andi clearly very damaging for the Prime Minister, and i hope you will change course. Is there any way at all he can survive . I think the prime only preserved, sovereignty is only secured, democracy is only ministercan can survive . I think the Prime Minister can survive but you need to doa numberof sustained, greatness is only minister can survive but you need to do a number of things. I think it realised by the will and devotion of does need to apologise for what was done earlier this month in terms of patriots. Their spirit is found the proroguing parliament. I think he needs a change of strategy, and i strength to resist oppression, the think he needs a change of strategist. So the people that inspiration to force legacy, the goodwill to seek friendship and the advised him down this path will need bravery to reach for peace. Love of to leave number ten. Advised him down this path will need to leave numberten. I advised him down this path will need to leave number ten. I think if he does that, recognises the need for a our nations makes the world better new approach which will unified the for all nations and to all the country, not till i do, then i think leaders here todayjoin us in the he can continue. I dont think most fulfilling mission a person particularly the country needs could have, the most profound another conservative Party Contribution anyone can make, lift leadership. Why should his advisers go and not him . I think the last up contribution anyone can make, lift up your nations, cherish your culture, on your histories, treasure thing the country needs at the moment is another leadership race your citizens, make your country strong and prosperous and righteous, within the conservative party. I think the Prime Minister needs to honour the dignity of your people change course and change strategy. And nothing will be outside of your if he does that, then i think he can reach. When our nations are greater, stay in place. But if he is going to the future will be brighter, our people will be happier and our change course credibly, i think there is clearly going to need to be partnerships will be stronger. With changes of personnel. there is clearly going to need to be changes of personnel. I have a gods help, together, we will cast statement here from sirjohn major, who of course was part of the legal off the enemy of liberty and ove rco m e off the enemy of liberty and overcome the oppressors of dignity. Action at the courts, saying, i hope this ruling from the Supreme Court will detect any future prime we will set new standards of living minister that from shutting down and set new heights of human parliament. Adding that now Prime Minister should ever treat mnemonic achievement. We will rediscover Old Parliament in this way again. I know that you are saying that you think mysteries and make thrilling new breakthroughs and we will find more borisjohnson that you are saying that you think Boris Johnson can that you are saying that you think borisjohnson can survive. In beautiful friendship and more practical terms, he has a majority harmony among nations than ever before. My fellow leaders, the path of 43, he has been found by the high score in the line to have to peace and progress and freedom applied to the queen, can anybody and justice and a better world for have faith in him as a leader now . All humanity begins at home. Thank just as a technical point, i think you, god bless you, god bless the what the Supreme Court looked at, nations of the world and god bless they did not particularly get into they did not particularly get into america. Thank you very much. The motivation behind the advice to the motivation behind the advice to the queen. This is without doubt hugely embarrassing and difficult donald trump they re donald trump theyre speaking to the for the Prime Minister, i completely General Assembly in new york. A acce pt for the Prime Minister, i completely accept that. I think the question is fairly ponderous speech at times as how we go forward from here. I am not calling for him to resign, but i has been commented on social media am coming for him to reflect really in the last half hour, he seemed almost bored with the event that he was at. Im just reading a comment seriously on the words delivered by lady hale today, to look at the from our north america editor saying strategy he is pursuing, and that this speech is to borrow a recognising it is not taking the phrase a little low energy. I dont country in the right direction. I do know if he is tired or bored, think there is a need for an apology. I also hope we will not see perhaps both. An attack on the judiciary, the know if he is tired or bored, perhaps both. Some know if he is tired or bored, perhaps both. Some of the themes we re perhaps both. Some of the themes were reminiscent of the first Prime Minister is very strong and policy, a reiteration that he slapping down any suggestion from believes in bilateral rather than multilateral trade deals. He spoke numberten or slapping down any suggestion from number ten or government ministers that the judges were doing anything about his negotiation with boris other than theirjobs in terms of johnson, a magnificent trade deal, interpreting the law. I hope that is the route that borisjohnson takes, he said, is ahead of us. He talked but if he doesnt, then further about mutual defence and tell partners of the United States have questions will be asked about to pay for their own defence more than they did before but of course whether he can continue as prime the strongest words were reserved minister. Nicola sturgeon has been reacting to the news, this is what she has to say. Its extraordinary. For china and iran. Irans record for china and iran. Irans record for death and destruction is well at moments like this, politicians known he said. The severe economic have a tendency to engage in sanctions are in place and wont be hyperbole. It is no exaggeration to lifted only titans, he said. We must say that this is the most significant constitutional judgment not allow iran to continue on the we have heard in our lifetimes. The Supreme Court this money has found path to Nuclear Weapons. Also some out that the Prime Minister that has strong words and therefore the acted unlawfully, he did so to evade president of venezuela Nicolas Maduro who he said is hiding from scrutiny or accountability. He had no good reason for doing so, as he his own people and using oil wealth did all of this during a time of to prop up a corrupt communist rule. Political and constitutional crisis. It is genuinely exceptional and so to prop up a corrupt communist rule. 50 lots of reaction coming to that donald trump speech, a little low unprecedented. In terms of what should happen now, clearly, key and a little flat as i say. Many parliament should be back in section people saying that on social media accession as soon at the moment. While you have been away theres been a lot reaction to parliament should be back in section accession as soon as possible. The court found that parliament is not a the high court. To the supreme slippery road at the moment. My understanding is that parliament will be back in session tomorrow morning and i welcome that. Secondly, i think in light of the court act decision today. The conservative party are due to go to judgment today, a Prime Minister their annual Party Conference next with any honour or tendered his resignation. We have a prime week. Keir starmer the shadow brexit minister who has been found by the secretary had saying that he would Supreme Court to have acted not vote for a recess. Why would we unlawfully for no good reason, and he said. That poses a dilemma to have a Prime Minister of continuing office in no because next week Prime Ministers circumstances is unthinkable. What if borisjohnson refuses to do what questions will resume. Were also hearing from the National Party. I you ask and resign . I would anticipate that as a quite a likely scenario of knowing how boris told you that earlier today Nicola Johnson reacts to these things. In sturgeon said she wanted the Prime Minister to resign and if he didnt those circumstances, firstly, resign he wanted parliament to remove him and weve had similar parliament, chop parliament was my First Priority would be to stop a words from the parliamentary leader of the snp who said that he must new deal. Parliament must ensure resign and if not then Parliament Must take it into its own hands. We that act is honoured. Secondly, borisjohnson will not do the will try and get some clarity on that a little later in the day. Honourable thing, then i think parliament has a duty to come together to force them out of office through an act of no confidence. It lets talk to the brexit party. Im joined by belinda de is unthinkable, given the rules of lucy, who is a member of the European Parliament for the brexit party. Democracy and accountability, that a your reaction to the judgment today. Prime ministerfound democracy and accountability, that a Prime Minister found to have acted i think your reaction to the judgment today. Ithinka your reaction to the judgment today. I think a grave injustice have been unlawfully and are subject to that inflicted on the british people. Kind ofjudgment delivered today would stay in office. I think the this revolt against democracy from precedent that would set would not bea our so called mother of parliaments precedent that would set would not be a good one. The government has is exhausting. Press that hasnt refused to rule out proroguing happened yet and were this exhausting. The ruling today is a parliament again, what are your views on a match . I think any continuation. One of the reasons i government that has any semblance of voted brexited because i really believe in ourjudiciary and our responsibility or respect for democracy and the constitution will courts and they should interpret our think very, very carefully about the law. Although i may not agree with terms of thatjudgment delivered their rulings all the time i do today. I think any government that believe in the impartiality so what tries to Prorogue Parliament again for the same reasons it tries at the are you respect the judgments . I first time would be very foolish believe in the impartiality so what are you respect thejudgments . I may indeed. I wouldnt rule out this not agree with it but i respect it. Government taken that kind of action you think something has changed over the last few weeks . Yes. I think but it would be completely deep inside many of us we have a unacceptable. Parliament, as it has strong sense of fair play and it is getting to the point now where the donein unacceptable. Parliament, as it has british sense of fair play is being done in recent weeks, has a duty to come together and make sure that utterly and totally crushed and democracy is protected because that suffocated by this relentless is what is at stake. Of course, resista nce there is an impasse in parliament in suffocated by this relentless resistance to implement a democratic terms of the way forward for the vote and it will have severe consequences. Faith in our markets brexit. I make no secret of the fact and economy will be restored far quicker than faith in our democratic that i think there is to be a general election. I think parliament institutions. I think we are in a has been right to blocking a no deal dangerous path now. Many of your brexit and they should contain to do that. But we need a general election supporters have pointed to the to try and break this impasse, this decision not to investigate aaron banks. Im not surprised. Ithink it is not just a to try and break this impasse, this is notjust a parliament over brexit, this is a government and a has been one of the saddest tactics, parliament that is not doing anything else. Governance in the uk apart from devaluing our elderly which is a rather cruel tactic from has completely broken down, this is elements of the remain campaign but a government without a majority. It another tactic was to constantly try cannot go on like this, i general and discredit brexiteers, justice election has to be a priority sooner or later. As soon as we can say we co nsta nt and discredit brexiteers, justice constant discrediting of our vote, have ruled out a no deal brexit at the results, russian interference, the end of october, i think the next step should be to bring this come only advisory, horrible attempts down and have a general election and when we voted in good faith and we that should be as quick as believe that our institutions will practically possible. Following the respect their own manifestos let alone their promises to the people which they clearly havent. Thank ruling of the house of court of you for your patience and am sorry session, damaged it when the we have kept you for a while. Territory of criticising the judges. They quickly rode back from that, borisjohnson has said that he respects the rule ofjudiciary. Do you trust him on this . borisjohnson spoke very briefly today but he did make some comments you trust him on this . I think about recession has a lot what to do to onJeremy Corbyn. Today but he did make some comments on Jeremy Corbyn. Have you prove that. He has just been proven embarrassed the queen . Have you by the Supreme Court to have acted apologised to the queen . Jeremy unlawfully. We clearly have a government playing fast and loose with the normal rules of democracy. The very fact that we are having to corbyn. Apologised to the queen . Jeremy corbyn. Will you apologise to the have a Prime Minister that he queen Prime Minister . So you can respects the judiciary says just how hear the reporters saying that strongly that this period that we Jeremy Corbyn called on him to are living in is. It is beyond resign. I dont know if you could make it out but the Prime Minister question that the government will respect asjudgment, question that the government will respect as judgment, but the fact that i dont think it is beyond said, Jeremy Corbyn is talking out of the back of his neck and should question really do say everything about the nature of the government call a general election. Will he do in office right now. It also says that . Everything about why we need to get the Guardian Correspondent this element of office as soon as dawn foster is in brighton too, reporting on the conference. Lets talk to her now. Possible. And at the past few the snp seems to be pushing for a moments, borisjohnson has arrived vote of no confidence before october at the United Nations general 31. What has been the rumour down assembly in new york, that is where there in brighton . Everybody in he has been digesting this dramatic news from the Supreme Court today brighton was absolutely that the 11 Supreme Courtjustices shell shocked by the news. I have spoken to a lot of mp5 and unanimously found that the government acted unlawfully in delegates. Everyone was shell shocked and i think the suspending parliament. Full reaction government and Boris Johnson coming up injust a few minutes on shell shocked and i think the government and borisjohnson in particular were equally surprised. I the one oclock news. Time for a think everybody has been really surprised by how this has happened but also the fact that immediately look at the weather. Borisjohnson but also the fact that immediately Boris Johnson wasnt but also the fact that immediately borisjohnson wasnt quite sure about how to respond. It is going to be very interesting to see what happens tomorrow. Immediately that borisjohnson claimed it was thoroughly wet this morning happens tomorrow. Immediately that Boris Johnson claimed that the across parts of england and wales prorogation has nothing to do with brexit and now he turns around and for the morning rush. Some localised says it will make negotiations flooding in place, thanks to low harder. Everyone ive spoken to here pressure. Heavy rain moving think that is complete nonsense, a northwards over the run of spoken to in the use as next few hours, the next feature to nothing has changed in terms of negotiations the only thing that has move in bringing whence the sound changed is that borisjohnson and pa rt move in bringing whence the sound part of the country. The conservatives have been really already, we have seen some damaged by this. Clearly we see that from the heavy rain, and then it will be turning windier across southern areas. 50 watch out for these gusts johnson is going to have to fly back reaching 40 50 mph in the far tomorrow. He will arrive at 11 30am south west later in the day. A band of heavy rain will be tomorrow. He will arrive at 11 30am tomorrow in parliament. It will be pushing into the central and southern scotland, very interesting to see how he Northern England this afternoon. Explains this away and what will a bit of sunshine, a few showers for western scotland happen at the conservative party and Northern Ireland, conference next week. In terms of perhaps some sunshine for the midlands. The labour party strategy, prior to but heavy, blustery showers will be pushing into the south west. The labour party strategy, prior to thejudgment of those temperatures around the mid to high teens celsius. The labour party strategy, prior to the judgment of the Supreme Court, it seems to be to wait it out and a blustery day for all but the winds, really, will be picking up across parts ta ke it seems to be to wait it out and take no deal off the table and force of wales, South West England this evening. Borisjohnson to go to brussels and those strong winds pushing their way across Southern Coasts of england as well, request an extension. Do think it so a wet and a windy night to come here. Has changed to such an extent that further north, breezy, Jeremy Corbyn will have to call a not quite as windy, rather cloudy with outbreaks of rain and nowhere particularly cold, vote of no confidence. lows of 12 14 degrees. Jeremy corbyn will have to call a vote of no confidence. I think they will stick to the strategy of making that feature continues to push sure no deal is taken off the table into the near continent, it means it could be fairly windy before a general election. They and wet for a while dont want an election to happen in across the south west. But notice we are in between weather the beginning of november and see the beginning of november and see the uk crashed out of the european systems, a ridge of High Pressure moving in for wednesday afternoon. Union without a deal on the 31st of we start off windy and fairly wet across the south and south east. October. I think labour will be that will tend to clear away. Pushing very heavily to get the the winds will turn lighter for many and quite a lot of cloud around, a few showers in Central Government to move to a general and northern areas. But some sunny spells as well, election but they wont do that u nless election but they wont do that unless they have assurances that a so it could feel a touch warmer, temperatures of 16 20 degrees. Lot of other opposition parties want a very short lived window of brightness, though, the next area of low pressure as well that we wont end up falling hurtles in off the atlantic on thursday to bring another spell out of the eu with no deal on of wet and windy weather, halloween, essentially. Followed by sunshine and showers. Some of that rain will be quite heavy as it pushes its way eastwards first thing on thursday. Thank you very much for your but it will brighten up a little bit into the afternoon. Thoughts. Plenty more reaction coming up here on College Green. Best of the sunshine across central and eastern areas, mercifully the rain has stayed off pretty heavy showers pushing into many western parts. And those temperatures, again, us thus far. Lets find out what around the seasonal average, will happen with the weather. The mid to high teens celsius. So it remains unsettled to end the week, with low pressure and therefore it will be wet and windy at times. It was thoroughly wet this morning followed by sunshine and showers across parts of england and wales and those temperatures remaining about average, for the morning rush. With fairly mild nights. But you will notice that as we head on into the weekend, it starts tapping something a little bit colder across the northern still lots of surface water half of the country. Elsewhere from the days rain, heavy showers from the south west and it will be longer spells of rain through tonight and strengthening winds. Wind is lighterfurther through tonight and strengthening winds. Wind is lighter further north with rain in eastern scotland. Missed in fog issue in tomorrow mornings rush hourfor some. Particular in the west. 40 to 50 mile an hour gust possible for tomorrow particularly close to the english channel. Thoroughly wet start and the rain going away a bit more smartly compared to this morning. A few showers dotted around but sky is brightening. Some sunny spells, few heavy showers here and there to the north and west but temperatures 17 to 20 degrees. This is bbc world news im geeta guru murthy. Our top story. This is bbc news, a devastating defeat im Christian Fraser, for Boris Johnsons government. Bringing you the news this afternoon britains highest court rules from College Green that his decision to suspend just outside the house of Commons Parliament was unlawful following todays Supreme Court ruling. The headlines at 4pm. And is null and void. 11 of the countrys most senior the decision to advise her majesty judges unanimously rule that borisjohnsons decision to Prorogue Parliament was unlawful. To prorogue was wrong, and stopped parliament carrying out its duties in the because it had the effect of run up to the brexit deadline. Frustrating or preventing the ability of parliament to carry out the decision to advise her majesty its constitutional functions without to Prorogue Parliament was unlawful, because it had the effect reasonable justification. Of frustrating or preventing opposition politicians call the ability of parliament to carry for Boris Johnsons resignation. Out its constitutional functions the woman who mounted one without reasonable justification. Of the legal challenges says the Supreme Court has upheld the rule of law. The Prime Minister said those that brought the case were trying to stop todays ruling confirms that we are brexit on october 31st. A nation governed by the rule of obviously, this is a verdict which we will respect, and we respect the judicial process. Law. Laws that everyone, even the Prime Minister, is not above. I have to say, i strongly disagree mps are told they can now return with what the justices have found. To Parliament Tomorrow i dont think that its right. Morning and get back to work. I have instructed the house authorities to prepare a not for the and i invite borisjohnson, in the historic words, to consider his position. Recall, the prorogation is unlawful cheering and is void, to prepare for the resumption of the business of the house of commons. Mp5 will now return to Parliament Tomorrow morning at 11. 30 and get back to work. I have instructed the house authorities to prepare not for the recall the prorogation was unlawful and is void to prepare for the resumption of the business of the house of commons. Hello, and welcome to bbc world news. In an extraordinary blow to the uk government, the Supreme Court has ruled that the british Prime Ministers decision to suspend parliament for five weeks was unlawful. The decision by the judges was unanimous devastating defeat for the Prime Minister, borisjohnson. All 11 judges concluded that the governments course of action was designed to frustrate parliamentarians from carrying out their constitutional duties in the run up to the brexit deadline. A warm welcome back to westminster. The courts president , lady hale, i tempted fate by saying the weather was very kind, but then the heavens said the effect on the fundamentals of our democracy was extreme. Opened. Borisjohnson is flying back and prorogation was now void. To london from new york tonight, after the Supreme Court ruling there are now growing calls that his decision to suspend for borisjohnson to resign. Parliament for five weeks in the run up parliament will resume tomorrow, to the brexit deadline with todays ruling being broke the law. Seen by some as a legal the decision was unanimous, and political earthquake. And is a crushing defeat for both the government and the Prime Minister himself, just two the Prime Minister. Months exactly into his job, all 11 judges concluded that the governments course is in new york preparing to speak of action was designed to frustrate to the un General Assembly. Mp5 and lords from carrying ben brown is at the Supreme Court. Out their constitutional duties. The speaker of the house of commons says preparations are under lets go to ben brown at the supreme way for mp5 to return court. I dramatic, to Parliament Tomorrow morning. Lets go to ben brown at the Supreme Court. Idramatic, historic lets go to ben brown at the supreme borisjohnson, who said court. I dramatic, historic and politically explosive judgment from he disagrees with the ruling the Supreme Court, which is the though he would respect it highest court in the land. And said that there should really a staggering defeat for the now be an election. Richard lister has our first report on the days proceedings government and Prime Minister, boris and the reaction outside the Supreme Court. The rain may have muted the brexit johnson. Partly because this protests outside court but this decision was unanimous, all 11 was always going to be a day of reckoning for both sides. Supreme Court Justices decision was unanimous, all 11 Supreme Courtjustices agreeing mr inside, thejustices had to weigh up johnson did break the law when he conflicting judgments on whether the suspension suspended parliament. And also the of parliament was done legally. Strength of the words of the this was their unanimous verdict. Judgment, saying the effect on the fundamentals of democracy by suspending parliament had been extreme. Ourfirst report suspending parliament had been extreme. Our first report on the proceedings and the action outside the decision to advise her majesty the Supreme Court. To Prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of parliament to carry the rain may have mooted the brexit out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification. Protest but this was always going to bea protest but this was always going to be a day of reckoning for those inside. Thejustices had to wire up that echoed the judgment conflicting judgments on whether the by the court of session in edinburgh, which said suspension of parliament was done the Prime Minister intended to stymie parliamentary scrutiny legally. This was a unanimous of his brexit plans. The high court in london had said verdict. The decision to advise her judges shouldnt weigh in on such political questions, majesty to Prorogue Parliament was but the Supreme Courtjustices said that was wrong. Unlawful. Because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the the courts have exercised a supervisory jurisdiction over the lawfulness of acts ability of parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without of the government for centuries. As long ago as 1611, reasonable justification. That echoed thejudgment reasonable justification. That echoed the judgment by the court of session in edinburgh which said that the court held that, the Prime Minister intended to stymie parliamentary scrutiny of his the king, who was then brexit plans. The high court in the government, hath no prerogative london said judges shouldnt weigh but that which the law of the land allows him. In on such political questions but this case, she said, the Supreme Court justices was about defining the limits in on such political questions but the Supreme Courtjustices said that was wrong. The courts have exercised of Prime Ministerial power and Parliament Must always be able to exercise its authority over government. In the words of lord bingham, a supervisoryjurisdiction was wrong. The courts have exercised a supervisory jurisdiction over the lawfulness of acts of the government senior law lord, quote, for centuries as long ago as 1611, the conduct of government by a Prime Minister and cabinet the court held that, quote, the collectively responsible and accountable to parliament lies at the heart of king, then the government, have no westminster democracy. Prerogative that that which the law of the land allows him. Defining the this is not a standard or normal prorogation. When parliament was prorogued two weeks ago, the speaker limits of power and authority must made his feelings clear and the Supreme Court agreed with that sentiment today. A lwa ys limits of power and authority must always be held over government. Limits of power and authority must always be held over governmentm the words of lord bingham, the conduct of government by a Prime Minister of cabinet collectively and although mp5 filed out as requested, responsible and accountable to the courtsjudgment parliament lies at the heart of was that they had no need to because borisjohnsons advice westminster democracy. This is not a to the queen was unlawful. Standard or normal prorogation. When when the Royal Commissioners walked into the house of lords it was as if they had walked parliament was prorogued two weeks in with a blank sheet of paper. The prorogation was also ago, the speaker made his feelings void and of no effect. Parliament has not been prorogued. Clear and the Supreme Court agreed the court said it was now up to parliamentarians to decide how with the sentiment today. Although and when to resume the session. Mps found out as requested, the for the businesswoman who has battled for years to give court double judgment was that they had no need to as borisjohnsons parliament its say on brexit, advice to the queen was unlawful. This was a landmark moment. When the Royal Commissioners walked into the house of lords it was as if the ruling today speaks volumes. This Prime Minister must open they had walked in with a blank the doors of Parliament Tomorrow. Sheet of paper. The prorogation was mp5 must get back and be brave also void and of no effect. And bold in holding this unscrupulous government to account. Parliament has not been prorogued. The court said it was now up to parliamentarians to decide how and when to resume the session. Cheering for the business woman who has battled for years to give parliament its ion brexit, this was a landmark moment. The ruling today speaks thank you. The High Court Said this volumes. This Prime Minister must was a judgment on the boundaries of government power, open the doors of parliament not on brexit, but many in the uk will see those two issues tomorrow. Mps must get back and be as one and the same. Richard lister, bbc news. So, all eyes on parliament here brave and bold in holding this tomorrow. The Commons Speakerjohn Bercow has welcomed the ruling unscrupulous government to account. And says mp5 will return thank you. Cheering to the commons tomorrow morning. The High Court Said this was a labours leaderJeremy Corbyn judgment on the boundaries of and other Opposition Party leaders government power, not on products it have called on borisjohnson to consider his position. Jonathan blake reports now on the political reaction to this mornings decision. Brexit. But the uk will see those two issues as one and the same. Joy, surprise, maybe disbelief at the Supreme Court ruling, richard lister, bbc news. Dominic, which was as clear as it could have been. A unanimous decision that the Prime Minister had acted unlawfully. You were in court as that momentous judgment was read out, what was the the highest court in atmosphere like . A state of the United Kingdom has unanimously found that his advice to prorogue astonishment in court, jaws were this parliament, his advice given dropping on the floor, gasps from to her majesty the queen, the legal teams. Tears from the was unlawful, his position untenable and he should have the guts to do lawyers of gina miller and joanna the decent thing and resign. The court ruled the decision to Prorogue Parliament prevented it cherry. One thing that spoke volumes from doing its job without good reason, vindication for those was the governments senior lawyers who had argued that all along. We re was the governments senior lawyers were not in court to hear this being read out and that was maybe a hint i think the scale of this victory as the justices came out all was not for us and defeat for Boris Johnson well on their side. There is one is beyond what anyone expected. I think its right that critical paragraph, lady hale in her he considers his position. I dont think we can carry on with a Prime Minister who has judgment, which all of the 11 effectively been shown to have lied justices have agreed, it is impossible to include all the on such a major issue. Evidence that concluded the parliament isnt suspended. Effectively it is still sitting evidence that concluded the evidence that there was any reason, and the sooner we get back let alone good reason, that the into that chamber the better. Queen would be advised to Prorogue Parliament for five weeks. That is a remarkable conclusion on this case because four days last week the the Prime Minister accepted government fought against any kind the decision, but said of suggestion from the court that that the legal challenges that led to it were they should look into the reasons an attempt to stop brexit. And the effect of those, they have lost hands down on everything here. But also a really clear statement i strongly disagree with this from the court on its constitutional decision of the Supreme Court. I respect the judiciary. Role, its role in upholding the balance of power between parliament asa balance of power between parliament as a senior partner and government as a senior partner and government asa as a senior partner and government as a junior partner to be kept in check. This law goes to the 18th century and earlier. The role of i dont think this was the right decision. Judges and overseen government. I think that the prorogation fundamentally what they justices has been used for centuries have said is that the body with the without this kind of challenge. Most work to do in overseeing boris its perfectly usual to have a queens speech. Johnson as Prime Ministers thats what we want to do. More importantly, lets be in no parliament over there, and now there is no legal route for the prime doubt, there are a lot of people who want to frustrate brexit. Minister other than to accept that there are a lot of people who basically want to stop this parliament is returning and he has country coming out of the eu, to return to parliament to answer and we have a parliament for what is going on. That is our that is unable to be prorogued, that does not want to have an election, and i think it is time home affairs correspondent, commons we took things forward. Speakerjohn bercow has welcomed the at the labour conference in brighton, Jeremy Corbyn made the most of the moment ruling and says mps will return for the commons tomorrow morning at with an unscheduled appearance. 11 30am. Jeremy corbyn, labour leader, has called on borisjohnson the Supreme Court therefore passes to consider his position. Jonathan the baton to the speaker blake reports now on the political to reCall Parliament. I will be in touch immediately reaction to this mornings decision. To demand that parliament is recalled so that we can question joy, the Prime Minister. Joy, surprise, may be disbelief at the Supreme Courts ruling, which was as clear as it could have been. A unanimous decision that the Prime Minister had acted unlawfully. The other Opposition Party leaders were quick to call highest court in the United Kingdom for the Prime Minister to resign. He has acted unlawfully in trying has unanimously found that his to silence parliament, advice to prorogue this parliament, trying to silence the voices of the people, because he doesnt want to be held to account. He doesnt want to have given to her majesty the queen was to answer questions about his disastrous brexit policy. Unlawful, his position is untenable in doing so, he was prepared and he should have the guts for ones to mislead the queen and the whole country. To do the decent thing and resign. A Prime Minister with any honour the court ruled borisjohnsons would tender his resignation in the light of this judgment. Decision to Prorogue Parliament prevented it from doing itsjob hes been found to have acted unlawfully for no good reason without good reason. Vindication for and to have a Prime Minister those who had argued that all along. Continue in office in the circumstances is unthinkable. I think the scale of this victory for us and a defeat for boris mp5 needed no encouragement to return to the Commons Johnson is beyond what anyone some took their seats within minutes expected, i think it is absolutely right that he does consider his position. I dont see we can carry of the ruling. On with a Prime Minister who has effectively pensioned to have lied on such a major issue. Parliament is the speaker, never shy of stating parliament is sovereign, said it not suspended, not even adjourned. Should be back in business tomorrow. In the light of that explicit effectively, we are still sitting at the sooner we get back into the judgment, i have instructed chamber the better. The the house authorities to prepare not extraordinary ruling left the prime for the recall the prorogation ministers supporters furious. think we have a parliament was unlawful and is void com pletely think we have a parliament completely out of step with the to prepare for the resumption sentiment of the country, holding of the business of our democracy to ransom, ignoring the vote we had in 2016 to leave the the house of commons. At a stroke, the Supreme Court decision has stopped European Union. Cheering at the labour conference in the government in its tracks and left the Prime Ministerfirst brighton, Jeremy Corbyn made the frustrated by parliament most of the moment with an and now constrained by the courts. Unscheduled appearance. The supreme jonathan blake, court therefore passes the pattern to the speaker to reCall Parliament. Bbc news, westminster. I will be in touch immediately to demand that parliament is recalled so that we can question the my my goodness, while you have been watching, the heavens have opened. It is monsoon like weather. I hope you can hear me over it lets go to premiership. He has acted unlawfully in trying to silence parliament, new york, where the Prime Minister has been. James landale is there. No trying to silence the voices of the people because he does not want to be held to account, he does not want suggestion he is going to resign . To have to answer questions about his disastrous brexit policy, and in the boot here is pushing back on this, no apology, and acceptance of doing so he was prepared to mislead the queen and indeed the whole the law, and they say they will country. In light of thisjudgment respect thejudgment, the law, and they say they will today, a Prime Minister with any owner would tender his resignation. We have a Prime Minister found by respect the judgment, but firmly the Supreme Court to have acted u nlawfully the Supreme Court to have acted unlawfully for the reasons come for no good reason. And have a Prime Minister continue in office and the circumstances i think is unthinkable. Mps needed no a pretty bullish response and a lot encouragement to return to the comments, some took their seats of sources from downing street within minutes of the ruling. And the speaker, never shy of stating making it very clear in their view that this is pretty dodgy that parliament is sovereign, said it should be back in business constitutional territory of courts tomorrow. In the light of that getting involved in decisions made by the executive in this country. The Prime Minister is carrying on with his schedule, we think he is in explicitjudgment, the building of the unite wood tomorrow. In the light of that explicit judgment, i have tomorrow. In the light of that explicitjudgment, i have instructed the Health Authorities to prepare not for the recall, the provocation United Nations, meeting the World Leaders here today, and he is due to was not for the recall, the provocation was unlawful and is void, to prepare for the resumption of the business give a speech at the General Assembly today, then he will head out through the security and traffic of the house of commons. At a in manhattan to get back to the airport so he can fly back to london stroke, the Supreme Courts decision has to stop the government in its airport so he can fly back to london a little earlier than anticipated. Tracks and Prime Minister first there has been some discussion here frustrated by parliament, now constrained by these courts. About what might happen next week. I will ask you to put your political jonathan blake, westminster. Thats hat on. Kier starmer has said there is no suggestion, labour will vote it from the Supreme Court, which has today recorded one of the most for a resize to allow the conservatives to go on their party momentousjudgments in today recorded one of the most momentous judgments in british today recorded one of the most momentousjudgments in british legal history with extraordinary conference, but there is the issue of Prime Ministers questions on constitutional and political ramifications, back to the studio. Wednesday, so how will they go about that, the conservatives . wednesday, so how will they go about that, the conservatives . I think they will try to carry on as much as they will try to carry on as much as they can, they are making decisions as we speak. I think the problem you norman smith is at westminster. This have got now is a perfect sort of is devastating for borisjohnson and the government. People like me far summary of the constitutional uncertainty we are in, so we have a too often used words like crisis, Prime Minister without a majority who is trying to get his policy shock waves, drama, today all those through parliament, that will not words apply and are absolutely not support him but equally will not exaggerations. Why . Because Boris Johnson is now fighting for his call a general election or support a vote of no confidence as far as we political life, because the court know. A lot of reactions this has left hanging in the air the morning our opposition members being distinctly cautious about calling a suggestion that borisjohnson deliberately shut down parliament to vote of no confidence because not every mp wants a general election avoid scrutiny during the middle of right now. So we are in that sort of the whole brexit crisis. In other constitutional status. I think there words, that he misled mps. And that will be voices within number ten who raises question marks about his will be voices within number ten who will say if eventually an election integrity, credibility, character, is held, the Prime Minister this morning was asked and repeated his and already we have seen demands desire for an election to be held, from every leader of the opposition then they think that the events of parties, the main opposition then they think that the events of parties, the main opposition parties, calling on him to go. We the last few hours will help in their argument when it comes to have had john major demanding he saying, look, there is a decision here when it comes to brexit, and issue a apology. His brexit either you are with the people and the views of the executive, and the government, and now they will supporters will want to keep boris probably throw in the courts as johnson in place because the other well. Some will think the narrative consequence is it threatens his whole Brexit Strategy because it hope the narrative can continue. Would seem to me now that boris the question is whether the prime johnson will be unable to carry minister can carry that because he through on his threat to defy is in starch a deep Constitutional Parliament and their bill outlawing crisis that he is being defiant a new deal brexit. The two key currently, but what has happened in the last few hours i think will shake an awful lot of confidence in political consequences are one, it puts Boris Johnsons the Prime Minister and the party who will say, can we go on like this . Political consequences are one, it puts borisjohnsons head on the block and could be a body blow to can he carry on with the narrative his Brexit Strategy. What happens of desperately trying to get some kind of brexit deal through or no deal brexit by the 31st of now . At 1130 tomorrow, mps will october in the face of parliament, return to westminster and i suspect potentially as he would argue, in the face of the courts, or is the there will be moves to begin political crisis he is now dealing co nte m pt of there will be moves to begin contempt of Parliament Proceedings against borisjohnson were papers with going to be too hard, and actually parliament might say, and documents and correspondence between his officials in an effort actually parliament might say, actually we need a different Prime Minister . The answers are unknown, to try and find the smoking gun, the we will have to see what happens in proof he lied to parliament and by the days ahead. Plenty to think about on that flight back to london extension lied to the queen. He will later tonight. Thank you very much. Face an important, confident, vindicated parliament who will now i have to say, if this was a talk for the remaining days of the third round fa cup match it would have been cold off long ago. But we brexit negotiations. In short, are going to keep on. This is the parliament has got its boot on boris perils of live broadcasting. With johnsons neck. We are waiting for what Boris Johnson johnsons neck. We are waiting for what borisjohnson has to say. He is me, jessica parker, our political in new york. He has spoken in the la st in new york. He has spoken in the last few months. Obviously, yes, correspondent, and a representative this is a verdict we will respect who was in the court this morning. And we respect the judicial process. Thejudgment we who was in the court this morning. The judgment we will look back on for many years to come. i have to say, i strongly disagree with what theyjustices have found. The judgment we will look back on for many years to come. I think so, it was a most astonishing moment, the most astonishing moment i have ever witnessed in covering big ido with what theyjustices have found. I do not think it is right but we public law moments in the courts, will go ahead and of course and what typifies the importance of parliament will come back. I do think there is a good case for the role of the Supreme Court, because it was set up to deal with getting on with the queen speech anyway, and we will do that. The big constitutional issues of the day. As well as the dispute over most important thing is we get on and deliver brexit on october 31 and minor legal points. Boy, did they do clearly the claimants in this case it with some effect, because when it are determined to try and frustrate that and stop that. I think it would became clear, initially lady hale, be very unfortunate if parliament made that objective which the people the president , said this is a unanimous verdict by the court, and we thought, gosh, this is wa nt made that objective which the people want delivered more difficult, but interesting. We started to then feel we will get on. A short time ago in that this would go against the new york. The former Prime Minister, government not least because the governments top lawyer wasnt even john major, has said no prime in court. When they said the Prime Minister should have a treat demonic minister had lost on the principle or parliament in this way again. Of whether the court could even roll letsjoinjames, on the subject, it was looking bad, or parliament in this way again. Lets join james, who is or parliament in this way again. Letsjoinjames, who is in new york, james landale. We havejust but when they are old hands down that the Prime Minister had lost and heard from borisjohnson, he says he lost in every point of this case, doesnt think the decision is right but he will go ahead with it and is still determined to deliver brexit at the end of october. For the and lady hale said the solution lies moment, a note of defiance for the in parliament itself, for parliament to reconvene rather than the prime Prime Minister. He has to accept the minister to take that power back, i judgment of the court, making it clear in the clip he has given to mean, it was illegal moment. It was the media, close to where we are so big in the history of the courts, now, he disagrees very firmly with it so big in the history of the courts, it was a legal omg moment. It this decision. That means, i think, there will be a question about how comes down to 11 hiresjudges of he responds to this further. That was very he responds to this further. That was very much a holding position. The question he has the answer now it was a legal omg moment. It comes down to 11 hires judges of the uk telling the Prime Minister, you is, does he collapse the days are one man, but the british constitution is made up of laws, which are overseen by this court and that parliament, and you cannot shut down that parliament. That events . Parliament has to hold your feet to is, does he collapse the days events . He is to meet with leaders the fire as it so wishes. It is of of iran, and donald trump. At the such importance, this case because moment, he is giving the impression whatever happens in brexit, and lady of business as usual but he still hale made clear, that this has has to work out what the fundamental response of the government will be. Nothing to do with brexit. He says there will still be a queens speech. How will he have a queens speech. How will he have a queen speech without parliament being prorogued first . Normally that would happen but we are not in sound problem normal circumstances so clearly at the moment the response from downing im going to take a referee street here, many thousands of miles away, trying to work out what is decision, we are going to post phone for a happening back on the ground in the decision, we are going to post phone uk is happening back on the ground in the ukisa happening back on the ground in the uk is a note of defiance and a fora minute, decision, we are going to post phone for a minute, get the water off the degree of pushback. Top of the gazebos, hand back to the studio because the weather is quite bad at the moment lets hand you lets go to brussels, they must be back to the studio. You can come time to work out what is going on on back to the studio. You can come back to the studio. You can come back to us when it is more claimant. The ground as well . The bbc press we will certainly do that. The elements against us down at College Offices are right next thought of green we will be back with the European Commission building and you could almost hear the sound of Christian Fraser in a moment. Jaws hitting the floor when the verdict was delivered by the Supreme Court today. Officially, the eu does not like to comment. We had from the commission today saying that this is a domestic issue for the uk and therefore not for them to comment lets hear more now on. This is what we are seen from gina miller, who brought the case to the high court, regularly throughout the roller was defeated, and then took it coasters of the Brexit Process so to the Supreme Court. This was her reaction this morning. Far. The Commission Also said that good morning, everyone. This is not a winforany good morning, everyone. This is not a win for any individual or cause, it isa under eu law, the negotiating a win for any individual or cause, it is a win for parliament. Todays ruling confirms we are a nation partner remains her majestys governed by the rule of law. Laws government which has borisjohnson at its head. My contacts also tell that everyone, even the prime me that technical talks between the minister, is not above. Do not let uk and the eu on negotiating a deal the government play down the seriousness of the judgment today, i will continue because they say those negotiations are never wasted. Unanimous judgment. They have spoken behind the scenes, the eu will of course want to know if borisjohnson will stay in hisjob, if they unequivocally, and what i say to the course want to know if borisjohnson will stay in his job, if they will bea will stay in his job, if they will be a sudden general election, but Prime Minister is to repeat lady for now they are concentrating on hales words, the order was a blank those technical talks. My contacts piece of paper, parliament was not tell me that the fundamental question remains unchanged, as a prorogued. Mp5 should turn up for compromise is found between the uk work tomorrow, and get on with and the eu, will that new deal have scrutinising this government. I and the eu, will that new deal have a majority in parliament and get would like to express my sincere through . The eu says that question thanks to my legal team, tom today, as yesterday, remains unchanged whatever happens today at the Supreme Court. We are bringing hickman, tom panic, we have had twice in three years to come to the Supreme Court to prove that the government does not put itself above you a special coverage of todays real political earthquake in the uk the law. The ruling today speaks volumes, this Prime Minister must with thisjudgment open the doors of Parliament Real political earthquake in the uk with this judgment from the Supreme Court. It is a huge change that many tomorrow. Mp5 must get back and be feel constitutionally in the legal brave and bold in holding this situation and a massive blow to the unscrupulous government to account. Government of borisjohnson. Rob, thank you. So, how is this going down with the general public . Lets speak to without getting into the technicalities of the law, people robert hull in stoke on trent. Are we re technicalities of the law, people were not expecting this . And if they abuzz with this news . fundamentally undermined the Prime Ministers position, with calls now robert hull in stoke on trent. Are they abuzz with this news . I think it was a collective sigh here this for him to step down, do you think morning, when the news broke, and you can survive this . Im not people are still digesting it and entirely sure that people were not will continue to do so when they expecting this, i think that people head back and look at the tv and what that those who want the Case Computers to see what the news is. Eventually had a good argument. As to mrjohnson was my position, i this was over 69 leave, this area, dont think there is any doubt that and a lot of people have been in normal times outside of the frustrated, which was expressed on brexit crisis he would have to the local Radio Station this resign, you cant be found to have morning, for the lack of progress. Given unlawful advice to the queen and that for many this will be and not resign. But it seems to me another obstacle in the road, but to that mrjohnson has no intention of hear from the horses another obstacle in the road, but to hearfrom the horses mouth, i have doing that, the little bit we had of gathered my own panel under my tent. Him there seems to me that this was there is no rain in here we have borisjohnson as a leader of the margaret, holly and kim. When you vote lead campaign, rather than Prime Minister. He is sort of heard the news, or digested the news doubling down, not apologising, about the Supreme Courts decision going ahead with brexit. I thought on borisjohnson, the framing of it was interesting. About the Supreme Courts decision on Boris Johnson, do about the Supreme Courts decision on borisjohnson, do you see this as a setback . How do you think you mrjohnson could have decided to be should react . I think he should more accommodating to the judgment, probably resign. Because he isjust there seem to be more mrjohnson, making a big sham. Thats my there seem to be more mrjohnson, the people and brexit versus the opinion. The counterargument would be, from those who just want to get establishment, judges, and on with this, and there are plenty parliament. Lets hear more of what of them here, he is the man to take a borisjohnson said. He is in new us out of europe and should stick to york preparing to speak to the un his guns. What would you say to General Assembly. Question is that . Well, he will have to be a bit whether he will make that address or feel under pressure to come home. He more tactful if that is the case, had you in new york now. Obviously and have a little more empathy and understanding with the peoples this is a big doubt we will respect wishes. When you heard this news, and we will respect the judicial process. I have to say i strongly what was your reaction . Actually i disagree with what the justices have ama found. I dont think that its right what was your reaction . Actually i am a big fan of borisjohnson as london mayor, but what happened but we will go ahead and parliament today, i think he should step down, will come back. I do think that is a because what i see is, if you are good case was getting on with a queen speech anyway and we will do that. The most important thing is shutting down the parliament, that that. The most important thing is that we get on and deliver brexit on is it, it is a democratic country, the uk is called the mother of october the 31st. The claimants in democracy, and i think he should this case are clearly determined to step down. He would say, i have a try and frustrate and stop that, i job to do and should complete it, think it will be very unfortunate if what would you say to that . What i parliament made that objective which would say is, because he came and people want delivered more difficult but we will get on. You say you want to get on with the queen speech but elected, he should have taken votes, you cannot prove luke, the court and then come, so i dont even think found it would be undemocratic at this time . You cant prorogue. It was a proper way to come into are not certain that the justices parliament, i dont see a positive. Did say that. They fought the so that is to questions over him. Holly and kim, you did not vote in prorogation that we chose was not something they could approve of, the referendum, you are not old its an unusual judgment enough, but lets look atjust something they could approve of, its an unusualjudgment to come to getting on with things on october in my view, parliament has used the 31st, which is the date we are scheduled to leave, with everything thatis scheduled to leave, with everything that is going on, should we pause . prorogation for many. The prerogative of prorogation is a video old one and is not being feel like it has taken three years, contested before in this way. The they need to crack on with it. They main thing is that we are going to just need to stop being internally go on and deliver brexit on october conflicting against each other and 31. 0f go on and deliver brexit on october sought it out because the country is 31. Of course parliament will now have to come back but we will respect that i get on with it. So a mess at the moment as it is, and you mean to fish ahead with a fresh, we are going to get so many more people against us if we keep as it were, my pre regression even carrying on this facade. Kim, do you though the court has given the highly critical project it has forced up as of now, parliament is feel that the country is in a state still sitting in session . That is and we need to bring an end to it . Yes, she said it pretty much spot right. I dont think the justices on. For example, the vote was three excluded the possibility of having a years ago, it is only recently they queens speech. What we should have put a date on when we are certainly do is ensure parliament has plenty of time to debate brexit, leaving the eu. Obviously three parliament has been debating brexit years later, knee and hollywood have for three years solidly. Now is the the opportunity to vote, we would chance for us to get a deal, come have been involved, so i think we out of the eu on october 31 and now either need to move on and stop thatis out of the eu on october 31 and now that is what we will do. The court found that your actions were not messing about with it. There is only unlawful but essentially still debate over a second undemocratic, do you not feel some expression of regret . Even an referendum, the argument against apology might be required . As i that as we have made the decision as a country, we should stick to it. Said, i strongly disagree with this obviously we have all learned a lot decision, i have utmost respect for since, so as new voters, people who our judiciary couldnt vote the first time, do you decision, i have utmost respect for ourjudiciary for stop i dont think think it would make a difference of this was the right decision, the people your age would be able to prerogative for prorogation has been vote for a second referendum . 10096. Used for centuries without this kind vote for a second referendum . 100 . They should either, im not against of challenge. It is perfectly usual to have a queens speech. More another vote, the new vote should importantly, it leaves me in no include people now that couldnt doubt there are a lot of people that vote at the time, may that can vote wa nt doubt there are a lot of people that want to frustrate brexit, basically now, because there is a lot to be stop this country coming out of the learned and people that did vote three years ago are more educated on eu. We have a parliament that his at night, sol three years ago are more educated on at night, so i dont think its a bad idea to have another one. unable to the pre boot, doesnt want to have an election, and i think it would love to have a second referendum because i couldnt vote is time we took things forward. You at the time and it affected all the say you wont extend brexit, but how generations, especially university do you avoid doing that now that you students, so. Ill come back to have run out of options . On the margaret, just before we stop, we contrary. As the law currently talked about borisjohnson. Where do stands, the uk leaves the eu on you think we should go now . We are october 31, come what may. The all racking their brains to think, interesting or exciting thing for us what happens now . Parliament has to now is to get a good deal, that is what we are working on. Ill be go back together, even the men from honest with you, is not made much the backbench, and the lords, they easier by this kind of stuff in should all be called back on and parliament or the courts. Obviously, getting a deal is not made much they should have a vote together to easier against this background but say whether they should be keeping we will get on and do it. You say we borisjohnson. Say whether they should be keeping Boris Johnson. Do we stick to leave on october 31 as the law october the 31st . I dont think we can sort it out by then. All right. Stands. As the loss that is, we cannot leave until the 31st without nodding all round. That is a tiny the permission of parliament. As the Cross Section in this tent, so you law stands, we leave on october 31. Get a sense of the discussion going lam very law stands, we leave on october 31. I am very hopeful that we will get a deal. I think people of the country on here and in a lot of households wa nt deal. I think people of the country want to see parliamentarians coming this evening. Thank you very much. Yvette cooper, together, working in the National Interest to get this thing done, and the labour mp for pontefract and thatis interest to get this thing done, and that is what we will do. A pretty castleford, and she also chairs the astonishing interview from boris home affairs committee, she is johnson because he is completely joining us from the house of unapologetic, completely defiant. He is seen as the law stands, hes commons. I think this is a really going to take the uk out of the eu important ruling today, it says that at the end of october. That is not a Boris Johnsons important ruling today, it says that borisjohnsons decision to cancel simple expression of where the Law Parliament for five weeks was stands . No, its not because one of unlawful, that the advice he gave to the last thing is that palin did the queen was unlawful, and it is before it was pre road a couple of weeks ago was to pass a new act of making the broader point that a sitting Prime Minister cannot simply Cancel Parliament for weeks and parliament which provides that u nless parliament which provides that weeks on end, simply to avoid unless the Prime Minister has negotiated a deal by the 19th of questions, to avoid having to answer october that he must seek an those questions and to avoid the extension from the eu beyond the scrutiny, and i think it is u nfortu nately scrutiny, and i think it is unfortunately the case that we have 3ist extension from the eu beyond the 31st of october. That is now the seen repeatedly from Boris Johnson law. What happens if he tries to that he behaves as if the normal define defy that . I hope that he rules do not apply or if another rules do not apply or if another rule applies to him than everyone else. I think this is a very important ruling by the Supreme Court, not just for will abide by the rule of law. Important ruling by the Supreme Court, notjust for now but for the long term about the way in which the government needs to be held to define defy that . I hope that he will abide by the rule of lawm you try to prorogue in order to try account, needs to answer questions and needs to do so publicly. That to force us out at the end of would stand for all future october, can the court to stop it in governments, then. 50 what does it mean in terms of whether something time . The government has announced that they want this parliamentary is labelled as a recess or prorogation and the generation that session to end. They are perfectly is permissible now . The differences justified in wishing that because of the session has already run for more prorogation means select committees than two years, and a parliamentary session normally runs forjust one cannot meet, and cannot publish year. You typically enter one with evidence we have been given, and we prorogation and a new queens have been given recent evidence from speech, but we normally only last a the home office about things at once week or so, not five weeks. That is to do, technology it is proposing to what very unusual in this case. When operate at the borders, well, we Parliament Resumes, i expect we will cant publish that during the get a statement from the leader of prorogation, which is weeks and weeks on end, even though it is the house announcing the really important for people to see governments plans, including a date that and scrutinise it to see if it for the queen speech which may still is going to work. In prorogation we be the 14th of october, and possibly also cannot take forward the aid revised date for prorogation, Domestic Violence bill, the domestic which might be a few days abuse bill, really important beforehand. I would guess may be the 7th of october. Astonishing to see legislation. If it is just the recess of parliament, we can take it those last two clips from boris forward and ask questions and get johnson, too slow to find my sticking to his guns. Of course, he a nswe rs forward and ask questions and get a nswers to forward and ask questions and get could face a vote of no confidence answers to those questions, and one particularly important opportunity is that it means now the liaison tomorrow, couldnt he . He committee can meet, which is all of differently came across more as the chairs of the select committees able to quiz the Prime Minister to leader of the birtley campaign down as minister of the uk. It is also ask detailed practical questions about what the government is doing. Very striking how hesitant was. I that was due to happen on the 11th of september, it was cancelled picked out something really interesting from what he said which because of borisjohnsons unlawful i think its to the heart of the decision. I think its really brexit crisis in many ways. You can important that committee may should either take the view that britain is meet, because we need answers. This in the most profound political is about making sure the Prime Minister cannotjust crisis since 1945, is about making sure the Prime Minister cannot just abuse his in the most profound political crisis since1945, which is power, cannot concentrate power and essentially what mr johnson does have to answer practical questions. We are in conference crisis since1945, which is essentially what mrjohnson said, that the main voters are standing in season, labour, your own party, the way of brexit. Or that the meeting in brighton, the project of brexit as is so amazingly difficult and complicated that mr johnson hadnt fought it through and the politicians are finding very ha rd the politicians are finding very hard to agree on a way to deliver that referendum. You can take your the speaker of the house, mr pick which one of those two views bercow, says this would be a resumption of parliament. The wave that you think more accurately which borisjohnson resumption of parliament. The wave which Boris Johnson is reflects reality we want to bring resumption of parliament. The wave which borisjohnson is operating is so much bluster and guff, rather than a managed and sensible way to we wa nt reflects reality we want to bring we want to bring this in, jeremy do things, so it means mp5 need to corbyn has been writing to the be back here in parliament, i have ruling at his partys annual come here this afternoon to talk to conference. I invite borisjohnson, the select Committee Clerks to do some operation, because we obviously need to be able to really question in the historic words, to consider his position and become. And the Prime Minister on how he could make this unlawful act in the first place, how he could give this advice to the clean, which i think also puts the queen in a very unfair position because of the chaotic way he acted. This advice to the become the shortest serving prime queen. What is to stop him minister that has ever been. Obey proroguing parliament again . Downing street say they will abide by the ruling of the court, but in their view this was perfectly legitimate the law, take no deal of the table because he wanted to bring forward a and have an election to elect a new queens speech, and in their view that has been done for hundreds government that respects democracy, that respects the rule of law and of years. Very legitimate to bring brings power back to the people, not forward a queens speech, of course usurp it in the way that boris thatis forward a queens speech, of course that is something governments need johnson has done. We can speak now to do, but the normal prorogation is five days, not five weeks. Five to adam fleming at the labour party days. I am conference in brighton. I dont know five days, not five weeks. Five days. Iam not five days, not five weeks. Five days. I am not a lawyer but i think the courts would be pretty sceptical about Boris Johnson whether you could hear the end of the courts would be pretty sceptical about borisjohnson having been found unlawful, it is such an Boris Johnsons unthinkable thing to happen on the whether you could hear the end of borisjohnsons interview whether you could hear the end of Boris Johnsons interview in whether you could hear the end of borisjohnsons interview in new york, saying that as far as he is scale, for the Prime Minister to do Something Like this, to try to avoid concerned, the law says that britain leaves at the end of october. Can and hide from questions from you give us a flavour of how persons might be reacting to what has parliament in this way, to be found happened over the last few hours . To do so unlawfully and then shrug his shoulders and try to do the same thing again, i think that is there is a variety of points of view irresponsible, and again itjust comes back to this pattern of in brussels. The eu do not comment behaviour which is that he just doesnt think the normal rules, the normal laws apply to him, he is the on domestic matters, this is a Prime Minister, he needs to be matter for the british system and responsible and sensible. It is not fairon the responsible and sensible. It is not fair on the country to just rip up the rules in this way. Yvette cooper they are keeping out of it. Then mp, thank you very much for talking privately people are astonished, to us. Ben brown has been outside some say it is good for british democracy, they thought it was the Supreme Court today, and he spoke earlier about the significance anti democratic, suspending of thejudgment. Parliament for five weeks and they are pleased it has been reversed. And people closer to the eu and uk thejudgment the judgment handed down thejudgment handed down here this morning was unanimous and it was talks who are a little bit worried also historic and dramatic and because they think it adds a huge potentially politically explosive. Dose of instability to the british lets discuss it with robert craig political system. What you need when from the university of bristol. Did you are in negotiations, trying to get a deal, a stable negotiating you see this coming . Not in a partner. That was summed up by my million years. It feels like a colleague in brussels. What happens next . Everyone in brussels has a lot lifetime since the judgment came down this morning. Im still of questions along those lines. Next . Everyone in brussels has a lot of questions along those linesm reeling. I can speak now but im terms of granting the uk and still reeling. No one expected this judgment. What about you . Im still extension, if Boris Johnson terms of granting the uk and extension, if borisjohnson cant ta ke extension, if borisjohnson cant take the uk out at the end of october, how close to that deadline in shock. Im normally chatty but i can that happen . There is a european have generally found it difficult to find the words at times today. Im council, summit of eu leaders, still very shocked. Because it was scheduled for the 17 18 of october, unanimous because of the strength of in normal times you would expect thejudgment . More unanimous because of the strength of the judgment . More the unanimous because of the strength of that would be the point at which the thejudgment . More the latter unanimous because of the strength of the judgment . More the latter but eu would have received a request the judgment . More the latter but the 110 the judgment . More the latter but the 11 0 in itself wasjust a shock from the british Prime Ministerfor after shock the 11 0 in itself wasjust a shock aftershock aftershock. The first an extension if they wanted it, shot was 11 0. The second shock was probably a week before so the eu had the fact that it was so powerfully time to come up with a position, and then that would be agreed at that written and so strong. What it did summit in the 17th and 18th of october. And then they would agree a in terms of the outcome was even duration of the extension and any more surprising because it hadnt conditions attached, and then the uk really been discussed during the would show their approve of it as oral arguments. They had been one well. However, people are thinking throwaway comment by lady hale when because of the instability in the there was a problem about whether uk, this clash between the Prime Minister and what Parliament Says prorogation was not an void about an extension to prevent no deal, that request may come very nobody picks up on it but i noticed light. | deal, that request may come very light. I have just deal, that request may come very light. I havejust spoken deal, that request may come very light. I have just spoken to some people who think may the eu will be it. I was live tweeting at the time dealing with a request for the sol extension by the uk on the 28th it. I was live tweeting at the time so i didnt really think about it but that was much more important than we realise. Until the 31st of october. They are planning for this to go right down to the wire, to use the horrible cliche. People living here who have to plan ahead for it potential no what are the implications of this deal exit and people in the judgment . Were going to see law continent. Politically, we are in being almost at work because were uncharted territory, and it is you going to see the resurrection of smile when you said if we were in bills we thought had died and normal times, adam. We could be faced with a challenge to the prime secondary registration and scrutiny ministers position, there could be of what government is doing back tomorrow but for me as a a vote of no confidence, unable to constitutional scholar who will be writing about this case for the rest resist calls for his resignation. Of my life, the wider ramifications potentially no stable government at are huge. They are absolutely huge. We have seen a statement from the all in the uk. What is the uk do in highest court in the uk and the most fundamental principles on how we terms of talking to someone. And understand our legal system. We will the other question is, if boris be seeing many, many, many pieces johnson refuses to ask for the for years to come about extension, can the eu say, the senior Civil Servant in the british parliamentary sovereignty and accountability to parliament. What government will ask for the extension while the political chaos does it do to our unwritten potentially unfolds . There is a few constitution this judgment and the balance of powers between the things to unpack, in terms of who government and the parliament and does the eu talk to when it comes to the courts . I think it does mean dealing with brexit and the british government, the answer is simple, that the courts have become more they deal with the government in relevant. This decision today puts front of them, officials, ministers the courts more into the political arena than they were before. Before we had miller one and that was the sent their way to talk to their opposite numbers in brussels. That la st we had miller one and that was the last time they had got involved in is why yesterday here at the labour the political stage stop this is a Party Conference in brighton they we re Party Conference in brighton they were discussing what their potential bigger step in that direction and it is very controversial. Robert and position on brexit would be. We will deal with the Labour Government when joelle, thank you very much for your thoughts and for being with us they are the Labour Government, they say, and are sitting at the table throughout the extraordinary proceedings we have had at the Supreme Court. We do know is that as opposite us. Fancy politics, but a result of this judgment today important nonetheless, especially parliament will be sitting again and domestically in the uk. In terms of mp5 will be back in the commons from an extension, what article 50, the 11 30am tomorrow morning. Bit of the eu treaty which governs the labour leader the departure of a member state says Jeremy Corbyn is making a speech at the partys comedy timing for article 50 from conference in brighton. Lets listen in. When triggered to when the country leaves is two years, that can be extended by mutual agreement. Of the 27 remaining countries and they one departing country, that is all it we are going to be having some says. The eu has interpreted in that musical entertainment before we hear there has to be a request for an from the labour leader. They are extension from the uk that is agreed running a bit late. We were due to hear from running a bit late. We were due to hearfrom him five minutes mutually with them and the eu. You running a bit late. We were due to hear from him five minutes to go running a bit late. We were due to hearfrom him five minutes to go but as these things are they do tend to cannot have the eu unilaterally overrun and of course mr corbyns speech has been brought forward as a granting an extension, making brexit ta ke granting an extension, making brexit take longer, without the agreement result of what has happened at the of the uk. That would be legally Supreme Court today and the speaker impossible and practically wouldnt mr boco calling parliament to resume make a lot of sense. Also, what the eu says says all along about brexit, session tomorrow. No deal and well, a little earlier my eu says says all along about brexit, no dealand an eu says says all along about brexit, no deal and an extension, they do colleague norman smith spoke not want to be responsible for a to former cabinet minister amber no deal brexit. That is code for them saying, if you want an rudd. Extension, we were granted. If they dont, they would be partially responsible for the uk leaving a day of huge drama at westminster without a deal and they want clean hands, moral high ground and say, but rather less so in new york. No say, is nothing to do with us. Until sense that there is any prospect of that position changes, an extension a resignation from borisjohnson or that he will be rushing back to would be granted. Thanks, adam fleming, even if you are not in the parliament if it resumes at 11 30am normal price, i hope you are enjoying the conference. We will tomorrow morning. Is that the right keep you posted on all the response . Im joined by amber rudd developments. Borisjohnson winner who quit the cabinet over the lack is in new york at the moment of planning and the emphasis on no striking a very defiant tone. Saying deal. How do think mrjohnson should he does not agree with the supreme respond . I hope you take this as seriously as the rest of us do. Court, but parliament is due to these are very difficult times but return tomorrow morning. In the historicjudgment we now todays ruling makes it even return tomorrow morning. In the historic judgment we have return tomorrow morning. In the historicjudgment we have had to stay, the Supreme Court in britain more serious. What i would like to has overruled the decision to see from the Prime Minister is a new strategy that he can set out suspend parliament by the government tomorrow and acknowledges the difficulty the Supreme Court has set in the run up to the brexit deadline. Seen as a damning ruling out under acknowledges that he needs to get a deal through parliament. For borisjohnson, and tries to work to achieve that by deadline. Seen as a damning ruling for Boris Johnson, baroness deadline. Seen as a damning ruling for borisjohnson, baroness hale saying the 11 judges agreed working with mp5. And tries to work to achieve that by working with mps. How do you then gauge his reaction because there is unanimously the five week prorogation was unlawful. She said no sense that he is coming back to the effect of a suspension was to parliament as a matter of urgency to stop all scrutiny of the government set out these different strategies. As it prepares to take britain out we havent heard that. But you asked of the eu at the end of next month. Me what i would like to see and that is what i would like to see. I think the speaker of the house of commons, it would be a tremendous mistake if john bercow, says comments must he just doubled down on it would be a tremendous mistake if hejust doubled down on his it would be a tremendous mistake if he just doubled down on his existing strategy which is getting such reconvene immediately. Resista nce strategy which is getting such resistance from the mp5 who were elected by their constituents to the rain may have mooted the brexit protest but this was always going to represent their views in parliament be a day of reckoning for those inside. And use their judgment. The justices had to weigh up conflicting judgments on whether the represent their views in Parliament Suspension of parliament and use theirjudgment. This whole concept of parliament being against was done legally. This was a unanimous verdict. The people is completely wrong. The the decision to advise her majesty to Prorogue Parliament was mp5 that i know are trying to unlawful. Deliver on the outcome of the referendum that the Prime Minister needs to work with them to try to do because it had the effect that. How is this going to pan out . Of frustrating or preventing the ability of parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification. If he doesnt adopt your strategy that echoed the judgment how will he carry on with the do or by the court of session in edinburgh which said die and standing up for brexit as it we re die and standing up for brexit as it that the Prime Minister intended to were against parliament. stymie parliamentary scrutiny die and standing up for brexit as it were against parliament. I dont know how it will turn out but i of his brexit plans. The high court in london said think anyone who does tell you how judges shouldnt weigh it will turn out may be using in on such political wishful thinking. Each week most of questions but the Supreme Court justices said us think that it cant get any worse that was wrong. The courts have exercised but each week it seems to. What we need is for the Prime Minister to a supervisory jurisdiction over the lead us to a compromised position so lawfulness of acts of the government we can turn down the temperature with the public, turn down the for centuries as long ago as 1611, temperature with mp5 and try and find a compromise. Let me put it to the court held that, quote, you that borisjohnson has pretty much set out his stall and he said the king, then the government, from the off it is do or die. If he hath no prerogative but that does not change course perhaps you which the law of the land allows him. Need to change not your leader but the Prime Minister needs to be moved on and someone else moved in. There has been some talk about whether she said the case was they should be a vote of no about defining the limits of power and authority must confidence and i think that would be always be held over government. A huge mistake. There is no in the words of lord bingham, situation so bad thatJeremy Corbyn the conduct of government by a prime couldnt make it even worse. Some of the stuff weve been hearing we know minister in cabinet collectively and responsible and accountable to parliament lies at the heart we do such damage to this country. I of westminster democracy. Wa nt to we do such damage to this country. I want to see if we can help the prime this is not a standard minister, help him try and find a or normal prorogation. Consensus in parliament but he does when parliament was need to address changing his prorogued two weeks strategy. What about the option ago, the speaker made his feelings clear and the Supreme Court agreed people have said before about a with the sentiment today. Government of National Unity under ken clarke or harriet harman. Does although mps filed that gain traction . There are so out as requested, the many moving parts in trying to get there and it is difficult to courts judgment was that they had achieve. The most important thing is no need to as borisjohnsons advice we dont have jeremy achieve. The most important thing is we dont haveJeremy Corbyn and we to the queen was unlawful. Try and deliver on the referendum when the Royal Commissioners walked and we dont just try and deliver on the referendum and we dontjust carry on. That into the house of lords it was as if they had walked in with was amber rudd speaking earlier. A blank sheet of paper. The prorogation was also lets go back to brighton and the void and of no effect. Parliament has not been prorogued. Labour Party Conference where we are expecting the labour leader jeremy the court said it was now up to corbyn to speak any moment now. Parliamentarians to decide how and lets listening. When to resume the session. Cheering for the businesswoman who has battled for years to give parliament its say on brexit, this was a landmark moment. The ruling today speaks volumes. Applause and cheering this Prime Minister must open the doors of Parliament Tomorrow. 0h, oh, Jeremy Corbyn mps must get back and be brave and bold in holding this unscrupulous government to account. Thank you. Cheering oh, Jeremy Corbyn 0h, oh, Jeremy Corbyn oh, Jeremy Corbyn . The High Court Said this was a judgment on the boundaries of government power, oh, Jeremy Corbyn . Thank oh, Jeremy Corbyn . Not on brexit. But the uk will see those two issues thank you conference, thank you. As one and the same. Thank you conference, thank you. Thank you conference, thank you. Thank you for that wonderful richard lister, bbc news. Welcome. This is an extraordinary and precarious moment in our countrys he urged rob watson and professor history. Robert hazell from university the Prime Minister has been found to college. People working have acted illegally when he tried internationally, this is a real to shut down parliament. Shift in emphasis in some say what the law says terms of parliament and applause the highest court in the land has the law says terms of parliament and the courts, the relationship between found that borisjohnson broke the parliament and the courts. But it is law. When he tried to shut down damning, isnt it, on the behaviour of the Prime Minister . damning, isnt it, on the behaviour of the Prime Minister . I dont agree democratic debate and accountability it isa of the Prime Minister . I dont agree it is a shift, i think it is ata democratic debate and accountability at a crucial moment for our public reminding us of the constitutional fundamentals, judges resting life. Judgment on the two principles, the Prime Minister acted illegally when he tried to shut down parliamentary sovereignty and parliamentary sovereignty and parliamentary accountability. The reason why they ruled the opposition to his reckless and prorogation for five weeks was disastrous plan to crash out of the European Union without a deal. Unlawful was because they felt constitutionally it was completely wrong for parliamentary scrutiny to but he has failed. Be suspended, closed down at such a applause crucial stage at brexit negotiations. What happens immediately . What are the options now . Borisjohnson immediately . What are the options now . Boris johnson has immediately . What are the options now . Borisjohnson has said he still wa nts to now . Borisjohnson has said he still wants to abide by this october 31 he will never shut down our deadline. What are the options democracy or silence the voices of before the parliamentarians who want us, the people. To stop that, or borisjohnson who wa nts to to stop that, or borisjohnson who wants to go ahead . When Parliament Resumes tomorrow, the first thing they are likely to discuss these the democracy that Boris Johnson terror settings. They have lost two describes as a rigmarole. Weeks of parliamentary business. The first day parliament was prorogued, laughter Prime Minister Boris Johnson first day parliament was prorogued, Prime Minister borisjohnson was due will not be stifled, and the people to appear before a select committee will have their say. Tomorrow of all the dots may i suspect that parliament will return. Committee will once again to call him back and start grilling him very applause quickly after his return to the uk. There were 18 bills before parliament but apparently were lost the government will be held to by prorogation. They are now back account for what it has done. Before parliament, parliament will wa nt to borisjohnson has before parliament, parliament will want to scrutinise those bills, five account for what it has done. Boris johnson has been account for what it has done. Borisjohnson has been found to have of them are brexit related bills. These select committees will get misled the country. This unelected back into gear and again start scrutinising the governments exit Prime Ministers should now resign. Plans brexit plans closer. Whether there this unelected Prime Minister. Will be parliamentary theatre like a no confidence motion in the Prime Minister, proceedings of content etc, we went to see. The important thing is parliament is back in business and back in the ordinary day to day business of its detailed scrutiny of the government and all chanting johnson out that would their brexit plans. Just give us a sense of how much pressure Boris Johnson is under. Many will say, this was a massive problem of his make him the shortest serving british Prime Minister in history, and rightly so. Own making, prorogation did not happen because he had already lost a vote to push back the october his isa and rightly so. Deadline. In short, he has lost his is a born to rule government of control of the Brexit Process. I the entitled, who believe that the think that happened some time ago but obviously it has worsened by rules they set for everyone else this ruling of the Supreme Court. I dont apply to them. Thats what would agree with everything, but to extend the horizon because i guess most people watching are wondering what on earth happens next. todays Supreme Court judgment spells out with brutal clarity. Most people watching are wondering what on earth happens next. Ijust wa nt to what on earth happens next. Ijust want to interrupt. We are watching borisjohnson want to interrupt. We are watching Boris Johnson speak in want to interrupt. We are watching borisjohnson speak in new york. Lets depend for a little bit at the there was no reason,let alone a moment. For the avoidance of doubt, i have the highest respect of course for judiciary i have the highest respect of course forjudiciary and good reason, thejudges i have the highest respect of course for judiciary and the i have the highest respect of course forjudiciary and the independence there was no reason,let alone a good reason, the judges concluded, for the Prime Minister to have shut of our courts, but i must say i strongly disagree with this down parliament. He thought he could judgment. We in the uk will not be down parliament. He thought he could do whatever he liked, just as he has a lwa ys deterred from getting on and do whatever he liked, just as he has always done all his life. He thinks delivering on the will of the people to come out of the eu on october 31. Hes above us all. He is part of an elite that disdains democracy. I because that is what we were tell you this. I dont think he is mandated to do. And we will fit to be Prime Minister. Simultaneously refuse to be deterred from delivering on what i think you would all expect, an exciting, dynamic domestic agenda intended to make our country ever more let me quote the Supreme Courts attractive to 11 and to invest in. Decision, conclusion. Unlawful, we will be pushing on. The infrastructure investment, 20,000 police, investing in our nhs and to null, and of no effect, and should do that we will need a queens be quashed. They got the prime speech to set out what we are going minister down to a t this crisis to do. And i think, frankly, that is what the people of my country of the can only be settled with a general uk wants to see, they want to see us election. Getting on with a strong domestic agenda and, believe you me, they applause wa nt to that election needs to take place as agenda and, believe you me, they want to see brexit delivered by october 31. Anyway, thats what you soon as this governments threat of need to know about what has happened a disastrous no deal is taken off in the court today. I can tell you, the table. Under any circumstances, Court Judgments, adverse or otherwise, my that condition is what mp5 passed heart lifts when i come to new york. There is something amazing about the into law before borisjohnson city, incredible energy. I love the illegally closed down our blue sky against the skyscrapers, parliament. Its a protection thats clearly essential, as after what has they waited, strange martian water towers on the tops of the buildings. Taken place clearly essential, as after what has ta ken place no clearly essential, as after what has taken place no one, but no one, can trust this government and this prime it is something you never find anywhere else about new york. But minister not to use this crisis of there are winning ways my many their own making to drive our country over a no deal cliff edge in ways new york and london are similar and united. We share a language, five weeks time. The Prime Minister has no mandate for a no deal crash kind of. Love it we have a basic out, which is opposed by the majority of the people of this idea of freedom. If you obey the law country. It would force up food prices, because shortages of and do no harm to others, you can medicines and threaten peace in come and live your life as you please in these great cities without Northern Ireland, thus destroying the great work of the good friday being judged. It is the excitement of that freedom that brings people of that freedom that brings people of talent to new york as it brings agreement. People to london. 50 you get this cyclotron effect and the flash of applause inspiration that leads to the battle over no deal is not a inspiration, prosperity and growth. Often, it will be a synthesis struggle between those who want to leave the eu and those who want to between american and british ideas. Like this thing outside, fantastic. Remain. Its about a small right wing group who are trying to hijack the we invented, for instance, the referendum result, to rip up our underground train. You invented the rights and protections, and shift even more power and wealth to those at the top. All under the cover of safety brake elevator, and take them together and you have a modern no deal, they want a sell off of metropolis. You can see diffusion what remains of our public services, across our cities across technology, strip away the regulations that keep the arts, newspapers. I think there are now1. 2 us safe, while slashing corporate the arts, newspapers. I think there are now 1. 2 million us people taxes even further. That would lead toa taxes even further. That would lead to a race to the bottom and employed by uk companies, 1 million or more in the uk trade now worth standards and workers rights and 200 billion a year. That is correct. Create an offshore tax haven for the going up the whole time, colossal super rich. And they want all of investment, but to cut to the chase, this locked in with a one sided, we now want to do so much more free trade deal that would put our because our country is going up a country at the mercy of donald trump. Thats why a no deal brags it gear. On october 31, because our country is going up a gear. On october31, as because our country is going up a gear. On october 31, as i say, we intend to be more global, outward is in reality a trump deal brexit. Looking and committed to the rest of the world than ever before. We are going to take advantage of all the freedoms brexit can give, whether that is new tax allowances ano for investment or speeding up public is in reality a trump deal brexit. A no deal brexit is in reality a procurement contracts, creating new free ports enterprises. Devising Better Regulation for sectors in trump deal brexit. This would mean which the uk leads the world, handing control to the us president. Whether bioscience, Financial Services or whatever. More 0f handing control to the us president. Of course trump is happy to have a competitive tax rates and the best compliant british Prime Minister in skilled work first in the hemisphere. I say to everybody who his back pocket. A trump deal brexit would mean us corporations getting has done me the honour of coming the green light for a comprehensive this morning to this breakfast, we ta keover of the green light for a comprehensive takeover of our public services. I will roll out the red carpet for our am not prepared to stand by while american friends and we are increasing the number of visas for our National Health service is scientists, ensuring that your brilliant students can stay on for two years so as to get real value sacrificed on the altar of us big business or any other big business. From their studies. And so that our economy in the uk benefits from our nhs is not for sale their expertise. We are even, i am delighted to see that back ensuring that us visitors are able to use the electronic passport system at heathrow. And in the coming general election, labour will be the only uk party we wa nt we want to do the much wanted a free ready to put our trust in the people trade. Im not saying that it will to have the final say on brexit. We be easy because there will be things aware that we do not white our nhs need to get brexit sorted and do it or not the table. There will be ina way need to get brexit sorted and do it in a way that doesnt leave our economy or our democracy broken. The tories want to crash out without a deal and liberal democrats want to difficulties but im very glad that President Trump has set up the cancel the countrys largest ever democratic vote with a commentary special relationship economic work and good because it is absolutely stitch up. Labour will end the absurd that there should be tagged brexit crisis by taking the decision back to the people with a choice, a as in the uk on californian wine. Or credible leave, alongside remain. Suit british shoppers pay over the that is not complicated. Labour is a odds for florida orange juice will Democratic Party that trusts the stop it is also absurd at the population of america has gone for people. Decades without eating a morsel of british lamb or beef, let alone haggis. I have discovered that anyone wanting to sell socks to the United States, i think they face a after three and a half years of tory brexit and failure and division, the only way we can settle this issue is tariff, is that right . They face a to bring people back together, is by tariff, is that right . They face a tariff of. I was told that there taking the decisions out of the are some fires that had to been hands of politicians and letting the taking to a laboratory and set fire people decide. So hands of politicians and letting the people decide. 50 within three months of coming to office, a labour to twice. The hosea industry of government will secure a sensible britain disputes this, they think deal based on the terms we have long they can overcome these barriers. Advocated and discussed with the European Union, trade unions, there are only certain ports in the United States that are licensed for businesses in different european governments. A new customs union, a close Single Market relationship and the import of british cauliflowers. The us military are banned from a guarantee of rights and buying british take measures as though there was some kind of protections. And within six months general prejudice against british rulers of all kinds. My friends, is of being elected, we will put that deal to a public vote alongside remain. And as a labour prime this really necessary . Let us Work Together to try to break down these minister, i pledged to carry out barriers that have been devised by whatever the people decide. Bureaucrats because all the evidence of the last two centuries is that free trade is the best and fastest way to increase the prosperity of both our peoples. As you are, other country both our peoples. As you are, other cou ntry ta kes both our peoples. As you are, other country takes a giant step out into the world. In keeping with our traditions but also with our new ambitions. To build on our relationship and ventures with our only a vote for labour will deliver friends in europe, the us and a public vote on brexit. Only a canada. We do it with confidence to Labour Government will put the power backin Labour Government will put the power make britain the best place in the back in the hands of the people. We world to start, build and run a can bring our country and our people together, which is what i am trying business, the place you will want your business to be in. That is why together, which is what i am trying to do all the time. Lets stop and i say to everyone here, come and join us. Thank you very much. No deal brexit and let the people decide. We must get brexit settled, not least because it has dominated our politics for far too long. The applause. Coming election will be a once in a generation chance for real change, a borisjohnson applause. Boris johnson speaking applause. Borisjohnson speaking live in new chance to kick out borisjohnsons york, repeating what he said in the interview that we play due earlier, government of the privileged few, and put wealth and power in the that he disagrees, the government hands of the many. A chance to give disagrees with the Supreme Court judgment and they are not deterred our National Health service, our from taking britain out of the eu on the 31st of october. We are joined schools, our police, our public services, the money they need by asking those at the top to pay their again by Professor Robert hazel and rob watson. Just looking at that fair share. Speech, the government line is that they are defiant . Absolutely, i said earlier he was acting as the leader of the birtley campaign rather than the Prime Minister of the uk. I a chance to take urgent action on think an awful of people look at it would say, goodness, its all rather the environment before its too late sketchy, is that it . Is that his for our children. And thanks to been presentation of a global before those wonderful young people that spoke to conference this morning and gave us a lesson in what we we re been presentation of a global before we were correctly interrupted by the Prime Minister, i was about to say environmentalism is about. And a about looking further ahead about the vision about what happens next. Chance to end the brexit crisis by it seems to me that unless mr letting the people, not the johnson does get a deal with eu politicians, have the final say. In leaders between now and mid october, a shameless bid to turn reality on its head, borisjohnsons born to or if he really is prepared to defy the law and take britain out of the rule tories are now claiming to be eu without a deal on at the 31st of the voice of the people. I know its october, we are looking at a hard, but bear with me. A political democratic event, sooner rather than later. By that i mean almost party that exists to protect the certainly a general election in establishment is pretending to be november because things cannot go on like that. Then depending on who antiestablishment. Johnson and his wins the election, the possibility of another referendum. Even further wealthy friends are not only on the down the line, the possibility none side of the establishment, they are of that would resolve anything at the establishment. They will never all. Absolutely, we could end up with a Hung Parliament or all sorts of outcomes because the labour opposition have not exactly had a be on the side of the people when calm, strong week either. Professor supporting the people might hit them hazel, in your view, and their sponsors it hurts, in calm, strong week either. Professor hazel, in yourview, can calm, strong week either. Professor hazel, in your view, can you explain to me that if you are borisjohnson and you say you ordered determined their wants and and their sponsors it hurts, in to carry out the will of the people. Theirwants and in and their sponsors it hurts, in their wants and in their offshore bank accounts. In their wallets. How does he take the uk out giving what parliament has done to try to so let me send this message to boris stop him . If he stays within the law, he can only take us out by the johnson. If you still need your 3ist law, he can only take us out by the 31st of october if he succeeds in party into an election, we know your negotiating a deal with the eu campaign will be absolutely swimming before their Council Meeting that in cash. But we have got something starts on the 17th of october. The you havent. People, in their hundreds of thousands. Rooted in all experts say the prospect of that look pretty slim. Parliament passed a lawjust two weeks ago saying that if he has not negotiated a deal by the 19th of october that he must seek an extension from the eu. If our communities, all are age groups, all our diversity, all across this that comes to pass and he refuses to country. And we will meet you head seek an extension, my expectation is on with the biggest People Powered that parliament would then table a campaign this country has ever seen. Formal motion of no confidence in the Prime Ministerand his government, and i would expect that mission to succeed. Sol government, and i would expect that mission to succeed. So i think it would be displaced as Prime Minister. I want to bring in our political corresponded in westminster for us. We have and if we win, it will be the people political corresponded in westminsterfor us. We have seen pictures on twitter of mps wanting who win. Labour stands for real to resume their place already in parliament, we think they will all be back tomorrow . Yes, john bercow change in britain, real change after came out here to College Green earlier and said that he had yea rs of change in britain, real change after years of conservative cuts and instructed the house of commons authorities to prepare for mp5 to be failure. We will rebuild and transform our country so that no one back at 11am tomorrow morning. The house of lords is due to start is held back and no Community Left setting again at three oclock tomorrow afternoon. John burke made it very clear this is not a recall behind. As you may be aware, we live of parliament, they are simply ina behind. As you may be aware, we live in a country where the top chief resuming, he said that is because executives now pocket, in just two the Supreme Court made it clear that and a half days, what an average the Supreme Court made it clear that the prorogation never happened, this worker earns in a whole year. In session of Parliament Never finish. Mps, in theory, thoughjust other words, by january the 3rd, the session of Parliament Never finish. Mps, in theory, though just come back and take their seats tomorrow. Top chief executives have earned if you have been expecting prime what the average worker will not get ministers questions, which is what generally happens on wednesday until the 31st of december. How can midday, that will not be happening you call that fair or equal orjust because of the notification times that are needed for that. But the ina you call that fair or equal orjust in a modern society . Speaker did say that there will be what he calls the full scope for other mechanisms that can get ministers before the dispatch box. We are waiting to see what Boris Johnson will do, there are reports were thomas cook buses were able to that he may be coming back this fill their pockets with unearned bonuses while their workers face evening from new york, we will have to see what happens here in the redundancy and 150,000 holiday makers are stranded because commons tomorrow. And calls for his of theirfailure. We have had the recognition does not seem to be the major music coming out of number ten downing st at all, they are defiant greatest slump in wages actually despite this humiliating defeat from since steam trains were built. Its the Supreme Court. Some calling for a long time ago. To share wealth, we Dominic Cummings, who has been need to share power, and that is extremely controversial, an advisor what we will do in government, with behind the scenes, for at least him to go. Is there any sign that the bold, radical measures such as government would offer his skull . We giving the workforce a 10 stake in have heard nothing from the government are not so far. Boris large companies, paying a dividend forup to large companies, paying a dividend johnson seems to be pretty defiant for up to 500 a year to every about the idea of signing. There employee. And we will bring about have also been calls from Nicola Sturgeon who have called for him to the biggest extension of rights for workers our country has ever seen. Resign, Jeremy Corbyn has called for him to resign, so has the leader of the liberal democrats. They have also been calls from other senior figures to issue an unreserved apology, former Prime Ministerjohn major saying that he should be we were scrapped zero hours offering an unreserved apology to contracts. We will scrap them. We parliament. Again, we do not know yet what Boris Johnson will parliament. Again, we do not know yet what borisjohnson will debut, although he has said he will respect will introduce a £10 living wage including for young people from the thejudgment. Age of 16. You can get all the latest reaction to the Supreme Court was my decision on our website, we have minute by minute updates on our live page. Let we will give all workers equal me remind you of what has happened rights from the first day in their in the last few hours to stop an newjob. And extraordinary, humiliating defeat for borisjohnson extraordinary, humiliating defeat for Boris Johnson by extraordinary, humiliating defeat for borisjohnson by the supreme rights from the first day in their new job. And take court 11 judges ruling that the rights from the first day in their newjob. And take action on the gender, disability and Ethnicity Pay Prime Minister was matts decision to suspend parliament for five weeks gaps. And introduce Flexible Working in the run up to the brexit deadline was unlawful, that the Prime Ministers advise to the queen was time for workers experiencing the unlawful, and calls now for Boris Johnson to resign. He is in new menopause. It is labour that will york, due to speak to the un, possibly will fly back tomorrow. Get more money into your pocket Parliament Resumes tomorrow and rather than line the pockets of the borisjohnson was my position is still very precarious. Multimillionaires. And we will give people a democratic voice at work, allowing them to secure better terms it was thoroughly witless morning for parts of england and wales and pay themselves. So, allowing them to secure better terms and pay themselves. 50, within the first 100 days of our government, we we re first 100 days of our government, we were scrapped the Tory Trade Union act. We will scrap the tory trade for the today, there is likely to be some disruption. Union act. Already, we have seen some from the heavy rain, and then it will be turning windier across southern areas. 50 watch out for these gusts reaching 40 50 mph in the far south west later in the day. A band of heavy rain will be pushing into the central and southern scotland, and by the way, labour will never Northern England this afternoon. A bit of sunshine, a few showers for western scotland and Northern Ireland, perhaps some sunshine for the midlands. But heavy, blustery showers will be ever tell people they have to work pushing into the south west. Those temperatures around the mid to high teens celsius. Until they are 75. We simply will a blustery day for all but the winds, really, not do it. A Labour Government will will be picking up across parts of wales, South West England this evening. Those strong winds pushing their way across southern mean better wages, greater security coasts of england as well, and more say, putting power in the so a wet and a windy night to come here. Hands of people. And we will bring further north, breezy, not quite as windy, rather cloudy with outbreaks of rain and nowhere particularly cold, rail, mail, water and the national lows of 12 14 degrees. Grid into public ownership. That feature continues to push into the near continent, it means it could be fairly windy and wet for a while across the south west. But notice we are in between weather systems, a ridge of High Pressure moving in for wednesday afternoon. We start off windy and fairly wet across the south and south east. That will tend to clear away. The winds will turn lighter for many and quite a lot of cloud around, so the essential services that we a few showers in central and northern areas. But some sunny spells as well, all rely on are run by and for the so it could feel a touch warmer, temperatures of 16 20 degrees. A very short lived window of brightness, though, public, not for private profit. Its the next area of low pressure hurtles in off the atlantic quite simple, thats what we are on thursday to bring another spell going to do. Yesterday, here in of wet and windy weather, followed by sunshine and showers. Some of that rain will be quite heavy as it pushes its way eastwards first thing on thursday. Brighton, i met lewis walker. A but it will brighten up a little bit into the afternoon. Best of the sunshine across central and eastern areas, wonderful nine year old boy, bright, pretty heavy showers pushing bubbly, lovely boy. Lewis is living into many western parts. And those temperatures, again, around the seasonal average, the mid to high teens celsius. With cystic fibrosis. Every day, he so it remains unsettled to end needs four hours of treatment and is the week, with low pressure and therefore it will be wet often in hospital, which obviously and windy at times. Followed by sunshine and showers keeps him from school and from his and those temperatures remaining about average, with fairly mild nights. Friends and the normal life of a but you will notice that as we head on into the weekend, nine year old. Louiss life could be very different with the aid of a it starts tapping something a little bit colder across the northern half of the country. Medicine. But lucy denied the medicine. But lucy denied the medicine he needs because its manufacturer refuses to sell the drug to the nhs at an affordable price. Lewis and tens of thousands of others suffering from illnesses such as cystic fibrosis, hepatitis c or Breast Cancer are being denied life saving medicines by a system that puts profits for shareholders before peoples lives. Labour will tackle this. We will redesign the system to serve public health, not private wealth, using compulsory licensing to secure generic versions of patented medicines. We will have the Drug Companies that if they want Public Research funding, then they will have to make their drugs affordable for all. And we will create a new, publicly owned generic drugs manufacturer to supply cheaper medicines to our nhs. This is bbc news. Saving our Health Service money and im ben brown at the Supreme Court, saving lives at the same time. I which has delivered a devastating would like to say is thank you to defeat for the government ruling that the Prime Ministers lewis and his family and so many decision to suspend parliament otherfamilies going was unlawful and void. Lewis and his family and so many other families going through the same level of stress which, despite all of that, they find the time in the energy to campaign for others. All 11 judges ruled that borisjohnsons decision to prorogue thank you, lewis, and thank you to yourfamily. Was wrong and stopped parliament carrying out its duties in the run up to the brexit deadline. We are the party, the labour party, the decision to advise her majesty who created the National Health service and only labour can be to Prorogue Parliament was unlawful, trusted with it. Because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing applause the ability of parliament to carry my applause my parentss generation, that out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification. Wonderful post war generation fought ha rd to wonderful post war generation fought hard to establish the principle of universal Health Service, owned and the Prime Minister said those that brought the case run by the public. They left it in were trying to stop brexit on october 31st. Our trust. Its our duty to defend obviously, this is a verdict which we will respect, and we respect the judicial process. I have to say, i strongly disagree with what the justices have found. I dont think that its right. And i invite borisjohnson, in the historic words, to consider his position. Cheering mps will now return to Parliament Tomorrow morning at 11 30am and get back to work. I have instructed the house authorities to prepare not for the recall the prorogation was unlawful and is void to prepare for the resumption of the business of the house of commoons. Welcome from the Supreme Court in central london, the highest court in the uk. It has ruled that the Prime Ministers decision to suspend parliament for five weeks in the run up to the brexit deadline was unlawful and void. The decision was unanimous it is a crushing defeat for both the government and the Prime Minister. All 11 judges concluded that the governments course of action was designed to frustrate mps and lords from carrying out their constitutional duties. The speaker of the house of commons says preparations are now underway so that mps can return to Parliament Tomorrow morning. Not surprisingly, Boris Johnson, whos in new york for a United Nations meeting, has said he strongly disagrees with what the justices have found but that the government will respect the ruling. Richard lister has our first report on the days proceedings and the reaction outside the Supreme Court. The rain may have muted the brexit protests outside court but this was always going to be a day of reckoning for both sides. Inside, thejustices had to weigh up conflicting judgments on whether the suspension of parliament was done legally. This was their unanimous verdict. The decision to advise her majesty to Prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification. That echoed the judgment by the court of session in edinburgh, which said the Prime Minister intended to stymie parliamentary scrutiny of his brexit plans. The high court in london had said judges shouldnt weigh in on such political questions, but the Supreme Courtjustices said that was wrong. The courts have exercised a supervisory jurisdiction over the lawfulness of acts of the government for centuries. As long ago as 1611, the court held that, the king, who was then the government, has no prerogative but that which the law of the land allows him. This case, she said, was about defining the limits of Prime Ministerial power and Parliament Must always be able to exercise its authority over government. In the words of lord bingham, senior law lord, quote, the conduct of government by a Prime Minister and cabinet collectively responsible and accountable to parliament lies at the heart of westminster democracy. This is not a standard or normal prorogation. When parliament was prorogued two weeks ago, the speaker made his feelings clear and the Supreme Court agreed with that sentiment today. Although mps filed out as requested, the courtsjudgment was that they had no need to because borisjohnsons advice to the queen was unlawful. When the Royal Commissioners walked into the house of lords it was as if they had walked in with a blank sheet of paper. The prorogation was also void and of no effect. Parliament has not been prorogued. The court said it was now up to parliamentarians to decide how and when to resume the session. For the businesswoman who has battled for years to give parliament its say on brexit, this was a landmark moment. The ruling today speaks volumes. This Prime Minister must open the doors of Parliament Tomorrow. Mps must get back and be brave and bold in holding this unscrupulous government to account. Thank you. The High Court Said this was a judgment on the boundaries of government power, not on brexit, but many in the uk will see those two issues as one and the same. Richard lister, bbc news. The Commons Speakerjohn Bercow has welcomed the ruling and says mps will return to the commons tomorrow morning. There will not be Prime Ministers questions, but he said there will be urgent questions to ministers. Labours leader, Jeremy Corbyn, and other Opposition Party leaders, have called on borisjohnson to consider his position. Jonathan blake reports now on the political reaction to this mornings decision. Joy, surprise, maybe disbelief at the Supreme Court ruling, which was as clear as it could have been. A unanimous decision that the Prime Minister had acted unlawfully. The highest court in the United Kingdom has unanimously found that his advice to prorogue this parliament, his advice given to her majesty the queen, was unlawful, his position untenable and he should have the guts to do the decent thing and resign. The court ruled the decision to Prorogue Parliament prevented it from doing its job without good reason, vindication for those who had argued that all along. I think the scale of this victory for us and defeat for Boris Johnson is beyond what anyone expected. I think its right that he considers his position. I dont think we can carry on with a Prime Minister who has effectively been shown to have lied on such a major issue. Parliament isnt suspended. Effectively it is still sitting and the sooner we get back into that chamber the better. The extraordinary ruling left the Prime Ministers the prime accepted the decision, but said that the legal issues that led to it were an attempt is not brexit. I dont think this was the right decision. I think that the prorogation has been used for centuries without this kind of challenge. Its perfectly usual to have a queens speech. Thats what we wa nt have a queens speech. Thats what we want to do. More importantly, lets be in no doubt, there are a lot of people who want to frustrate brexit. There are a lot of people who basically want to stop this country coming out of the eu, and we have a parliament that is unable to be prorogued, that does not want to have an election, and i think it is time we took things forward. At the labour conference in brighton, Jeremy Corbyn made the most of the moment with an unscheduled appearance. The Supreme Court therefore passes the baton to the speaker to reCall Parliament. I will be in touch immediately to demand that parliament is recalled so that we can question the Prime Minister. Other Opposition Party leaders were quick to call for the Prime Minister to resign. He has acted unlawfully in trying to silence parliament, trying to silence the voices of the people, because he doesnt want to be held to account. He doesnt want to have to answer questions about his disastrous brexit policy. In doing so, he was prepared to mislead the queen and the whole country. A Prime Minister with any owner would tender his resignation in the light of this judgment. With any honour. Hes been found to have acted unlawfully for no good reason and to have a Prime Minister continue in office in the circumstances is unthinkable. Mps needed no encouragement to return to the commons some took their seats within minutes of the ruling. The speaker never shy of stating parliament is sovereign said it should be back in business tomorrow. In the light of that explicit judgment, i have instructed the house authorities to prepare not for the recall the prorogation was unlawful and is void to prepare for the resumption of the business of the house of commons. At a stroke, the Supreme Court decision has stopped the government in its tracks and left the Prime Ministerfirst frustrated by parliament and now constrained by the courts. Jonathan blake, bbc news, westminster. I can talk now to our legal correspondent, clive coleman, and also to professorjeff king, from University College london, who advises the house of lords constitutional committee. Clive, we have heard reaction from borisjohnson. He clive, we have heard reaction from Boris Johnson. He does clive, we have heard reaction from borisjohnson. He does not agree with thejudgment borisjohnson. He does not agree with the judgment but he will abide by the law. What can the government do now . Nothing, basically. They cant appeal this ruling, there is no eu law, so he cant go to the european of justice, there no eu law, so he cant go to the european ofjustice, there is no human rights law, they cannot go to the court of human right will stop basically what this ruling today means is that they will have to go back to parliament to face the music, face the scrutiny of their brexit plans, and its a pretty humiliating day. Professor, you have been watching these hearings, you are an expert in law. What did you make of the unanimity of the judges, which are not a lot of people were expecting, and also the strength, the power of their judgment expecting, and also the strength, the power of theirjudgment and their words . Unanimity is quite unusual and is generally used when it is decided that it is very important to set a clear message that this is what the law requires, it isa that this is what the law requires, it is a matter of it being a close case or a political disagreement. The fact it was so clear was also incredibly important because sometimes when there is drafting by committee you end up watering the judgment down and focusing on some comment to nominate a position. That wasnt the case here, it was clear, unequivocal and extreme harsh for the government. It was stunning, people were. Jaws were dropping when they heard thatjudgment. Somebody called it a legal earthquake. Let me read again, because it is the most devastating paragraph in the entirejudgment. If there is anything more weathering that has been written by a judge in recent yea rs, that has been written by a judge in recent years, i would like to read it. Paragraph 61 rates, it is impossible for us to conclude on the evidence put before us that there was any reason, let alone a good reason, to advise her majesty to Prorogue Parliament for five weeks. What they are saying is that this was government advice given by the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom to the moniker of the United Kingdom, done without any discernible reason whatsoever. All of this is painfulfor Boris Johnson, but that is particularly stinging. We know there will be political consequences for the government. What does this do in broader terms for our unwritten constitution and our balance of powers between parliament and the government and the courts . powers between parliament and the government and the courts . I think it is part of a series of cases in the last ten years which show the court emerging asa the last ten years which show the court emerging as a real constitutional player, is one that is not afraid to say what it thinks the law is that apply in many of the great areas of the constitution. They were often filled in by executive action, by government, which tends to dominate parliament in the westminster tradition, the courts have traditionally shown a lot of deference for that, but now theyre ta ken lot of deference for that, but now theyre taken the rule of law more seriously, they believe it is part of their role to uphold the law. Seriously, they believe it is part of their role to uphold the lawn they are going to make the shoes decisions, we want to know more about who these Supreme Court justices are, as we do in the United States was up that is a credible argument. What we have seen since the early 19805 is the rise and rise of something called judicial review, we talk about it a lot, but it is basically a process where anyone can view or icon a5 basically a process where anyone can view or icon as long as we have the means, can go before a court and ask them to rule whether a decision of a public body, could be a minister or Prime Minister, is lawful or not. That has dragged the courts into the area of political decision making. Lord wolf, a former chiefjustice, traced it back to a time when political opposition to the government was weak, and the judges jumped into the void to hold the government to account. It goes quite far in that direction, and many people feel if that is what they are going to do, they should be elected and accountable, we should know what their opinions are. What do you thing about that . We have had tabloid papers accusing judges of being enemies of the people. Was this a Bold Decision for these 11 Supreme Court justices . this a Bold Decision for these 11 Supreme Courtjustices . I think it was bold in some ways, but the fact there was unanimity and the fact the decision was so clear is evidence that they were absolutely convinced on merit that the law requires the prime and a step decision to be regarded as unlawful. That is a view shared by many scholars and in particular many barristers at the bar. Well this means that the judiciary will come under greater scrutiny . I think a leg will become an unmitigated disaster, as it is in other countries was up there is some pressure to have confirmation style hearings in parliament. That will be resisted. The Judicial Appointments Committee was a step towards that. Thank you very much indeed. We can get some more reaction to this. A prominent brexit supporter and newly elected leader of the European Research group. What was your reaction question might like the Prime Minister, i disagree, but we must abide by that decision of the court. These questions were bound to come up, it is an earthquake moment. We must uphOld Parliamentary democracy and the rule of law. The real proper we have got here, the true problem beneath all of this is that parliamentarians have not accepted the referendum result and we need a general election to sort it out. In many cases, the answer is that they did not support a general election. Do you think downing street, Dominic Cummings, madea you think downing street, Dominic Cummings, made a mistake when they suspended parliament, a strategic mistake . When times are as difficult as this, we will have up and down. We have been through this before with Dominic Cummings and Boris Johnson, the position of authority, that was during vote to leave, there was an attempt to suspend Dominic Cummings was that i waited and said he would stay. What i would say is that in times as difficult as this, it is important not to be precipitate. We need to look at what is going on and try to remember some of the higher principles which we are trying to uphold, like parliamentary democracy and the rule of law. Parliament is back at work tomorrow. Will you be there . of law. Parliament is back at work tomorrow. Will you be there . I am at work today. I will be seeing my constituents at half passed, and i have had to cancel meetings to be in Parliament Tomorrow. A number of my parliamentary colleagues are at work. It gets a ndows skin that we only work in parliament. We are working for our constituents, but of course i will be there. Lady hale, president of the Supreme Court, said in herjudgment president of the Supreme Court, said in her judgment and president of the Supreme Court, said in herjudgment and she repeated what she said before, that it had nothing to do with the brexit, and how and when it leaves the European Union. Will this have any effect on the Brexit Process . I listened carefully to what she said and i have read the summary and i will go through and read the fulljudgment, but it is clear to me that this has profound political consequences and you can hear that in thejubilation of the opposition politicians. They dont want to leave the European Union. They dont want to stand by the manifestos on which they stood for election. This is a rotten parliament, it needs to be brought to an end. I very much hope that borisjohnson to an end. I very much hope that Boris Johnson tables and to an end. I very much hope that borisjohnson tables and other motion for an early general election so we can challenge those politicians say they want to remove him from Office Challenge them to say, vote for a general election. We spoke to gina miller earlier on, the business woman, she was saying that this was not about brexit, this was about protecting parliamentary sovereignty. Do you accept that . What is parliamentary sovereignty . Parliament is sovereign in the making of laws, it doesnt govern alone. The executive has its rights, some of which are in the crown prerogative, and the courts are there to ensure we have the rule of law. Not the role ofjudges, but the rule of law. That is to ensure that laws are applied. I am all for parliamentary sovereignty, but it must be properly understood as parliament upholding the law, or making the law. Parliament making the law. We are in a position where unconstitutional acts of parliament have been passed by unconstitutional means, and that was possible because the government has lost control of the government has lost control of the house of commons. It is really unprecedented that they should have happened without a general election, thatis happened without a general election, that is why we need a general election. We are an unconstitutional, in uncharted territory. The damage to a constitution could be enormous if members of parliament continue to be afraid of submitting themselves to thejudgment of afraid of submitting themselves to the judgment of their electorate. Nobody takes it lightly when you are in politics, but it needs to be done so we can have a Prime Minister with a majority, able to restore some of our constitutional laws. Steve baker, thank you for being with us this afternoon. The Prime Minister is attending the United Nations General Assembly in new york. Our Diplomatic Correspondent, james landale, is there james, we heard from the Prime Minister with his reaction. Some of his response to this extraordinary judgment from the Supreme Court. I think there is a degree of frustration within the team surrounding the Prime Minister this morning. He has said that he will respect their ruling, the judgment that has been made by the Supreme Court, but that he strongly disagrees with it. They are not rolling over, they are pushing back on this to say they will attempt find ways of getting around it. The prime and has made it clear that he thinks there should be a queens speech to outline the governments programme. What is not clear is how people engineer that queens speech because normally it comes shortly after parliament has been prorogued and a new session has begun. There is still uncertainty about that. At the moment, the impression we are getting is that mrjohnson will carry on as usual. We has a packed schedule here today, he will be talking to senior fellow heads of government, dollar trump, the us president , the president of iran, several other World Leaders. He is also due to give a speech to the un General Assembly much later today or stop what we are understanding at the moment is that after he has given that speech, he will fly back to the uk overnight, arriving back in the uk sometime public tomorrow morning, depending on the precise timings. In other words, morning, depending on the precise timings. In otherwords, he morning, depending on the precise timings. In other words, he will com plete timings. In other words, he will complete his schedule and then head back to deal with Parliament Tomorrow. Thank you very much. That is james landale, our corresponded life in new york. We can talk now to our correspondent in brussels, anna holligan. Any reaction there in brussels to what has happened here at the Supreme Court . On the whole, they are keeping a diplomatic distance was top this is a domestic issue but in the last few minutes we have seen a tweet from the European Parliament president , saying this is an important decision from the uk Supreme Court to rule on the ten won of parliament as unlawful. Any Brexit Agreement needs to be approved by both the uk and eu parliaments, so proper democratic scrutiny on both sides of the channel is essential, he said. We have also heard a range of views elsewhere from very outspoken pro european mep throw, one saying earlier, at least one big relief in the brexit saga, the rule of law in the brexit saga, the rule of law in the uk is alive and kicking. Parliament should never be silenced in real democracy. Then of course he had a slight dig, saying, i never wa nt to had a slight dig, saying, i never want to hear borisjohnson or any other brexit supporter saying again that the European Union is undemocratic. Mostly, they are tending to reserve judgment on what this will actually mean, because nobody really knows until we hear more from parliament. There has been a suggestion in the last half hour that labour may present a vote of no confidence. But, at the moment, the position here remains unchanged. They are waiting for proposals, concrete proposals to any potentially updated agreement on how the uk should leave the eu on the 315t the uk should leave the eu on the 31st of october as planned. Anna, thank you. Just to remind you what the Supreme Court has decided, effectively, borisjohnson acted unlawfully court has decided, effectively, Boris Johnson acted unlawfully when he advised the queen to prorogue or suspend parliament for five weeks will stop lady hale, president of the Supreme Court, 11 justices, said, recording that judgment, parliament has a right to a voice and the effect of this shutdown of parliament, this proroguing of parliament, this proroguing of parliament on the fundamentals of democracy with extreme. That is what lady hale said. So, how is this going down with the general public here . We know that people were following the hearings last week very closely indeed. Lets talk to robert hall, from bbc midlands, hes in stoke. What better week to be taking the ten project here in the week when the bbc is here for a whole seven days, looking at the area in a campaign we call we are stoke, so this is a big pocket point today. There was a phone in earlier, there was a collective tone. In my tent, we have my own tame panel. Andrea was a remain at. Sophie is a political reporter, and debbie was a leaf supporter. Lets talk to andrea first. I talked about a collective sigh of frustration. Are you one of those doing the psion . Yes, i am. I find it very frustrating. Where do you think this leaves you in your thinking about the direction you thinking about the direction you think we are going to go in . really dont know. I dont think the government knows what we are doing, it looks an absolute shambles. It is a barrister and to watch them on the tv, back biting each other. Nobody can makea tv, back biting each other. Nobody can make a decision. 50 it doesnt leave you with much confidence. There is a lot of talk about Boris Johnson, his position as a result of what the court had to say this morning. Should he hang on in there . I think yes, because there we have to go through the rigmarole of getting somebody else to do a job that nobody seems to want to do. He has to get on with it. I want to talk to debbie first. There is a collective frustration for a significant majority in this area. Are you beginning to despair from your side of things that what you wa nted your side of things that what you wanted to happen is actually going to happen . I dont think it will happen. It is all smoke and mirrors. I think they asked us a question they did not want the answer to, they did not want the answer to, they got the answer they did not wa nt they got the answer they did not want and now they are playing the long game and hoping that people get fed up and call an end to it. What about a court, the highest court in the land, talking about the government acting unlawfully, what is your feeling about that . You have to adhere to the law of the land, you cannotjust to adhere to the law of the land, you cannot just make to adhere to the law of the land, you cannotjust make up your own rules as you go along so somebody has to say, this is the lawful stop if that is what the court says, that is it. In term of october 31, sophie, i will come to you for an overview. In your travels around this area, are you hearing the same sort of things that andrea and debbie are talking about . Absolutely. When i talk to people about the latest experiences of brexit, they say, want to leave, we need to leave now, even those who voted to remain, they say, we just need it done, we need to move forward. A lot of them are saying, look how we look to the outside world. Stoke on trent voted to leave, and they say that was the view around here, so that is what they want to happen. So that is exacting what i am hearing. I think this is what we will expect to hear for the next few weeks at least until something is done. So that collective sigh is pretty accurate . Absolutely. I spoke to someone in the shopping centre, a remain supporter, who said lets have another vote. I dont hear that view that often. That is another view that often. That is another view that comes from this area of staffordshire. A whole other stone i will not turnover. Thank you all very much indeed. That is the collective view at the moment from stoke. But this is a big issue which is being digestive today, today pot development. We will hear a lot more in the days and weeks to come. Back to you. Thank you very much indeed. Lets cross to brighton. We can talk to professorjohn curtis. We were hearing the views of some voters. What difference do you think this turmoil, this constitutional turmoil we are seeing, what difference will that make to the electorate . We no an election is not far off . that make to the electorate . We no an election is not far off . I will be surprised if the opposition use a motion of no confidence. They will not wish to lose an advantage. What is also true, as far as the public is also true, as far as the public is concerned, attitudes towards this prorogation was all ready controversial, it was controversial in the sense that remain supporters opposed it. Leave the supporters tended to support it. How do those voters react . They may well say, this is the establishment ganging up on borisjohnson. This is the establishment ganging up on Boris Johnson. The this is the establishment ganging up on borisjohnson. The nagging doubt perhaps in the Prime Ministers mind is, well some of those voters who we re is, well some of those voters who were supporting the brexit party two or three months ago, now they are saying they would vote conservative, do they say, i am not quite sure this Prime Minister is capable of delivering brexit . In the end, we will know the answer to that by the end of october. By then, todays courtjudgment may end of october. By then, todays Court Judgment may not end of october. By then, todays courtjudgment may not have the impact that it is having in the forthcoming hours was not parliament sits again tomorrow. From tomorrow morning. How much more difficult due think that makes life for difficult due think that makes life foer difficult due think that makes life for mrjohnson . It clearly will mean that the government will be held to account. We can anticipate that parliament will be pressing for further detail about exactly how well the talks are going, what the government is proposing and so on. The crucial question is whether or not the circle remained alliance can cohere in order to pass further legislation or to adopt other moves. There of various possibilities. One is that it could try to legislate, to take october 31 out as the default date for leaving the European Union stop that would certainly change the position. They could perhaps think about trying to legislate for holding a referendum before any deal is passed, and they could in theory at least try to see whether or not amongst them they can come up to an alternative government which would mean they would be in a position to bring the government down without precipitating an election. The trouble is, we know that while this remain alliance was clear on what it was opposed to, no deal brexit, it is not clear that they can cohere around any of these alternatives and therefore whether or not this will make things much more difficult for the Prime Minister. That is uncertain. It will depend on whether this alliance can agree on other things that it wants to do to ove rco m e things that it wants to do to overcome some of the internal divisions. Going back to the original decision by downing street to advise the queen to suspend parliament, was that a strategic mistake . Dominic cummings, people are saying, is responsible for that and it was a huge mistake . M are saying, is responsible for that and it was a huge mistake . It is perfectly clear that, in the end, this proved to be a politically and tactically a mistake. It helped provide the impetus whereby the house of commons thought it only had days to do anything about avoiding a no deal brexit, passed legislation it might otherwise not have passed until next month at least. Now it is left when a situation where the Prime Minister is, at minimum, seriously embarrassed by the decision of the court and i think we also have to ask ourselves to what extent also have to ask ourselves to what exte nt d oes also have to ask ourselves to what extent does this begin to mean that some tory mp5 say to themselves, is this Prime Minister actually someone whosejudgment i this Prime Minister actually someone whose judgment i can trust . This Prime Minister actually someone whosejudgment i can trust . And whether, if those seeds of doubt are sown, whether that might make it more difficult for the Prime Minister to sell whatever deal, if any, he brings to his party from the European Union. Steve becker is very clearly going to fall in behind the Prime Minister. Biker. The question is now, as the Prime Ministers job question is now, as the Prime Ministersjob is being made more difficult because they are no longer quite so willing to trust the judgment in the way they would have 24 hours ago. We can show you some pictures of borisjohnson here, we can show you some pictures of Boris Johnson here, where we can show you some pictures of borisjohnson here, where he was heckled. You embarrassed the queen, Prime Minister. Have you apologised to the queen . Prime minister, have you apologise . To the queen . Prime minister, have you apologise . Have you apologised to the queen, Prime Minister . think that is probably is from journalists, rather than heckling. Asking if he had embarrassed the queen. The heavens have opened again here we can also hear a speech we have had from thejustice secretary in the last few minutes. Let me read you what he said. That is thejustice secretary saying we will respect the Supreme Court judgment and the judicial process and rule of law, even though the government respectfully disagrees with the courts decision. Well, the queen is still in residence at balmoral we just heard questions as to whether the Prime Minister had embarrassed the queen. We can cross there now and speak to our correspondent, rachel bell. It has been such a busy few weeks, a lot of political twist and turns and so it seems quite apt that were back here, at balmoral, where this saga all started. This, obviously being the queens holiday home. She has been here sincejuly over the summer. It has been nearly a month since members of the privy council made the journey from london here, to advise the queen on behalf of the Prime Minister, to Prorogue Parliament. That meeting only lasted 30 minutes or so and was rather short. But that meeting set off this Chain Reaction of events which we have been seeing unfold over the past few weeks and culminating in this decision by the Supreme Court today in which they said that advice given by the queen and the prorogation were unlawful. The judges said today, it is impossible for us to conclude on the evidence that there was any reason, let alone a good reason, to advise her majesty to Prorogue Parliament for five weeks. Now, the palace has yet to comment on the ruling but it is safe to say that the Summer Holiday for the queen has not been the easiest. Last week, we had a revelation from former Prime Minister, david cameron, that he had asked for the queens help before the Scottish Independence referendum. Kind of breaking that unwritten rule that discussions between the monarch and the Prime Minister are private and should remain private. And today we have this momentous decision by the Supreme Court that says the advice given to her by her own Prime Minister and privy council was unlawful. The queen, as you say, is in residence so the castle is a few hundred yards from the gate you can see behind me. We are hundreds of miles from parliament but yet, on the Summer Holiday, the queen has somehow managed, whether or not she likes it, to be embroiled in this constitutional row. The likes of which, she really hasnt seen in her 67 year reign. You very much indeed. Iamjoined i am joined here outside parliament where the heavens are have opened. Were just hearing about the queen. How difficult do you think this has been for the palace . This whole question of the advice to the queen and then her ultimately making the decision to prorogue, well, not making the decision, but she has to follow the advice she is given by independent Prime Minister. The court has found that the effect of her order is effectively the same as a blank piece of paper. It was not an void 50 i cant imagine that, deep down, the queen or the palace will be impressed by the way they have been advised and embroiled in all of this. But of course, as a strict legal matter, it doesnt really impugn the queen in anyway. So really impugn the queen in anyway. 50 her silent role in the constitution will carry on as normal. Allison, talk to us about judgment, because although there we re judgment, because although there were lots of permutations about what you and other experts thought, no one expected it to be as strongly worded or unanimous as it was. 11 0 . That is absolutely clear, no one thought all 11 wood group around this. A lot of us were not sure what the remedy would be. This is beyond the remedy would be. This is beyond the scope of the prerogative powers. Not only is that void, but it means parliament was never prorogue. None of us expected it to be quite as strong. Jeremy, do you go along with that . No one saw this coming . strong. Jeremy, do you go along with that . No one saw this coming . I do. The Divisional Court where we had a master of the laws, and the president of the queens bench decision, three really senior justices seeing this was not a matter for the courts, notjust a civil, the Supreme Court has overturned that. We saw the government might have been in trouble because the justices were keen to get into the facts of what was going on and to look at the effects on parliamentary sovereignty. I dont think anyone thought this would be unanimous and no one quite expected the extent of this new constitutional principle. That the court would move towards, which is that the court will now step in where parliamentary sovereignty has been undermined, the court sees it as its role to curve the prerogative power. Extraordinary stuff. The Supreme Court is quite young and here it is asserting itself, would you say . It is, but it is also important to recognise that it is trying to assert itself in a justifiable way. Drawing on legal principles. Saying we have these fundamental constitutional principles, protecting representative democracy, and the role of parliament. It is stepping into say these are the legal limits, this is a job, if you had a reasonable justification, we would have looked at the facts and evaluated it, but you had no reasonable justification here for breaching these constitutional principles. That reasonable justification is so important because it comes back to the absence of the witness statement signed by a statement of truth from a member of the government, saying why they were doing this. The justices the government, saying why they were doing this. Thejustices were very keen to emphasise that. Thank you both as ever for being with us. More political reaction now,. So, what happens next . Tomorrow will be a huge day in parliament when mp5 gather at 11 30am. Will Boris Johnson be there . Not if what he says at the moment still holds, which seems to be able carry on business as usual. But what might his opponents to . I am joined by ian blackford. This is a Prime Minister with no authority. Let us reflect on what has happened since he came to power. He has lost every vote he has put forward, parliament has barely sat, he has lost his majority in the house of commons and he has been absolutely humiliated in the courts today, this was a stunning decision, telling the Prime Minister in no uncertain terms, he has acted out with his power. He has acted in a way which is unlawful, frankly when you look at the behaviour and the performance of this Prime Minister, he ought to do the right thing. We know, in new york there was no hint of resignation, so my question is what do the opposition parties do . am the no very clear to all the other opposition parties i am making it very clear, that if boris doesnt do the right thing, this is a man who has shown he will stop at nothing, and is threatening to ignore an act of parliament that states we will not leave on a no deal basis from the eu. The opposition will have to come together and were going to have to force a vote of no confidence. We cannot tolerate that this man who is behaving in an undemocratic manner, behaving in an undemocratic manner, behaving a dictator, has to be removed from office and the opposition has to come together, the opposition has to come together, the opposition has to do itsjob. We need to remove him and we need to do that through a motion of no confidence, leading to a general election. To be clear, when would you table that . Because, obviously, from labours point of they would regard it as advantageous to them to delay that until after october 31 when mrjohnson will have failed to meet his do or die pledge. You are suggesting you cannot wait until then . Parliament has come together, and we need to be careful that that can be enacted so we need to take the necessary steps to do that. Once we are satisfied that is the case, then we need to have that motion of no confidence. But it has to come quickly, we have to seize the moment, we cannot leave him in office, he has to be removed. The opposition parties have to accept responsibility. Let me say to the other is that in scotland, we are ready for this. I want the opportunity to put ourselves in front of the electorate. We will ta ke front of the electorate. We will take the fight to our opponents in scotland. And i am confident the snp will increase representation. We will increase representation. We will do everjobs to bring this government to the end. The other parties have to do the same in the opposition. So from where you are sitting, you would like a motion of no confidence within days . As soon as is practically possible. Went back so what do you cite a Jeremy Corbyn who says that is all fine, but it is more advantageous, electorally to us, to wait until after october 31 . You have a situation where a Prime Minister has acted in a manner which is unlawful. It does not command a majority of the house, has lost every vote, we have got to accept our responsibility as waiting is not the answer. We have to seize the moment. And in the meantime, tomorrow, wednesday, parliament is back, no Prime Minister is questioned, no borisjohnson, maydaywhat do what do you do . What are you going to do . There is plenty we can do. We need to make sure that the legislation we have enacted is robust, so there may be things we can do around that. There are questions we can bring tomorrow. We have to hold this government to account as you thought it reasonable to act in an unlawful manner and shut parliament down. There is many things we can do. We need to discuss the situation regarding thomas cook, the fact that 90,000 people are losing jobs, people may need to be brought home from the 9000 people. People may need to be brought home from the 9000 people. What do you make of borisjohnsons suggestion that he needs a queens speech . Is that he needs a queens speech . Is that possible . He lives in a fa ntasy. That possible . He lives in a fantasy. It won earthy thinks he will get a queens speech through when he has lost the majority, sacked 21 of his own mp5 is preposterous. Boris is going to have to a cce pt preposterous. Boris is going to have to accept reality. This is a Prime Minister who is going to have a very short tenure, he is going to be removed from office, the opposition should do thatjob to make sure it is done as soon as is practically possible. What about the other idea which some opposition parties are talking about, of a government of National Unity . How close is that . To being realised . National unity . How close is that . To being realised . It is an election we need, we need to put ourselves in front of the electorate. If mechanisms need to be in place for that to happen, we would of course, look at it. But the priority is removed boris, lets have an election, and remove boris from office. Thank you very much for your time. It will be an extraordinary time. It will be an extraordinary time. If you are not doing much at 1130, yet by your television, anything can happen. Who knows, a motion of no confidence for Boris Johnson within days if he does not quit. Buckle yourself in norman, thank you we are always watching at 11 30am many thanks indeed. Norman smith, our assistant political editor. I am joined smith, our assistant political editor. Iamjoined by smith, our assistant political editor. Iam joined byjonathan ba rtley from editor. Iam joined byjonathan bartley from the green party. Parliament is going to sit tomorrow, what should be done in that time . The Prime Minister has to go. The sitting Prime Minister has been told by the highest court in the land that he has broken the law. Further to that, he has given the queen unlawful advice. I do not see how a Prime Minister can continue in that situation given the circumstances that have taken place. So Parliament Needs to be very clear that the Prime Minister has to go. He says he respects the decision of the court but does not agree with it, but he respected. What he said, the invitation in his statement was that he accepted that the attempt to Prorogue Parliament was a result of trying to stop those who wanted to foil brexit. He has admitted the very thing he was, just yesterday, denying. This is light upon lie upon lie, mess truth upon this truth, manipulation the constitution. This and sleepless Prime Minister is like borisjohnson wellman plate as much as they can. What would you say to people watching this you voted leave and want brexit to happen who say that all of this stuff in the courts is a sideshow ultimately designed, one way or another, to thwart brexit and stop it happening . It is very dangerous when you start to blame the judiciary, it is very dangerous when you start to blame thejudiciary, when it is very dangerous when you start to blame the judiciary, when you start to blame others for what is clearly a cock up by politicians. May make plain the people who brought the case in the first place, not thejudges. Brought the case in the first place, not the judges. The answer is staring everyone in the face is to ta ke staring everyone in the face is to take the decision back to the people and have a peoples vote. If this is about democracy, everyone says it should be about democracy, if this is about to people, everyone says it should be about the people, then have a peoples vote. The reality is, the hard brexiteers are running scared, they are frightened of taking it to the people, the peoples sovereignty and they are using every trick in the book to blame everyone else and they know what the answer is, and that is give the people the final say. You know what some will say watching the television right now, if this is about democracy, if this is about the people, we had a referendum three years ago, we know what the people said. And we all know that similar minute relation happened in that referendum and that people will use every trick at their disposal at every loophole they will find to get what they want. And right roughshod over the democratic process and democracy. We need to take it back to the people, to give people the final say in the right way. More democracy is not anti democratic, we all know that democracy is what happens between elections as well as at elections and if the events of the last three years have else rated everything, it is precisely that. Thank you for being with us outside the Supreme Court. We did hearfrom the Supreme Court. We did hearfrom the speaker of the house of commons, john bercow, he stood outside parliament and confirmed that members of parliament will return to Parliament Tomorrow morning at 11 30am. In the light. Of that explicitjudgement, i have instructed the house authorities to prepare not for the recall the prorogation was unlawful and is void, to prepare for the resumption of the business of the house of commons. John bercow underlining this is not a recall of parliament because parliament was never, legally, promote or suspended in the first place. So what is the Prime Ministers reaction . He is thousands of miles away at the United Nations, in new york. So the Prime Minister, unsurprisingly, is trenchant in his view that the decision is wrong. Hes in new york for a United Nations meeting. Heres what he had to say. To the ruling that he had acted unlawfully when he advised the queen to suspend parliament. Obviously, this is a verdict that we will respect and we respect the judicial process. I have to say, i strongly disagree with what the justices have found. I dont think that. Its right. But we will go ahead and, of course, parliament will come back. I do think theres a good case for getting on with a queens speech anyway, and well do that. But i think the most important thing is we get on and deliver brexit on october 31st. The claimants are clearly determined to try to that frustrate and to stop that. I think it would be very unfortunate if parliament made that objective, which people want more difficult. We will get on. You say you want to get on with the queen speech, but you cant prorogue. The court found that would be unlawful and undemocratic at this time. Im not certain that the justices did say that. I think that they. Certainly thought that the prorogation we chose was something that they could approve of. I think it is unusual judgment that they could approve of. I think it is unusualjudgment to come to, in my view. Parliament has used prorogation for many. The prerogative of prorogation is a very old one. And it is not one which has been contested before in this way. The main thing is, look, were going to get on and deliver brexit on october 31. Of course parliament will have to come back but we will respect that and come on with it. You mean to press on with a fresh prorogation even of the court has given the highly critical verdict that it hass because as of now, parliament is still sitting in session . That is right. I do not think that the justices remotely excluded the possibility of having a queens speech but what we will certainly do is ensure that parliament has plenty of time to debate brexit. They have been dealt debating brexit for three years solidly. Now is the chance for us to get a deal, came out of the eu on october 31 and that is what were going to do. The court found that your actions were not only unlawful but, essentially, undemocratic. Do you not feel some form of, some expression of regret or even apology, might be required . As i say, i strongly disagree with the decision of the Supreme Court. I have the utmost respect for our judiciary shall sol have the utmost respect for our judiciary shall so i do not think this was the right decision. I do not think that, prorogation has news for centuries without this kind of challenge. It is perfectly usual to have a queens speech. That is what we want to do. More importantly, let us be in no doubt that there are a lot of people who want to frustrate brexit. There are a lot of people who basically want to stop this country coming of that you and we have a parliament that is unable to. Be rolled. Unable to, doesnt wa nt to. Be rolled. Unable to, doesnt want to have an election. To be prorogued. You say you dont want to avoid brexit, but you have an interruption . On the contrary. As a law currently stands, the uk leaves the eu on october 31. Come what may. But the interesting thing, the exciting thing for us now, is to get a good deal and that is what we are working on. I will be honest with you, john, it is not made much easier by this kind of stuff in parliament or in the courts. Obviously, getting a deal is not made much easier against this background, but were going to get on and do with it. Finally, you say as the law stands we leave on october 31, that is not true, is it . As the law stands, we cannot leave without permission of parliament. As the law stands, we leave on 31st of october and i the law stands, we leave on 31st of octoberand i am the law stands, we leave on 31st of october and i am very. Hopeful that we will get a deal and i hope what the people want is parliamentarians coming together, working on, in the National Interest, to get this thing done and thatis interest, to get this thing done and that is what were going to do. Prime minister, thank you. That was the Prime Minister in new york with his verdict on the verdict we have had today in terms of the verdict we heard from the 11 Supreme Court justices who said verdict we heard from the 11 Supreme Courtjustices who said he had behaved unlawfully when he advised the queen to suspend parliament. Pretty extraordinaryjudgment, some pretty extraordinary weather here, now some sunshine. Let us get a look at the Weather Forecast for the whole country. Close to a month rain, that rain has moved northwards, linked to this zone of cloud. For the evening rush hour that rain pushes its way into scotland, turning right out through the rest of the day. Particularly, east. A lot of surface water and some spray, lingering across southern counties of scotland and into the north of england. Residual rain left around and we will see sunshine breakthrough for Northern Ireland and the rest of england and wales for a time but a few showers possible. They become more numerous for wales and the south west as we hit head to the end of the day. Rumbles of thunder and strengthening winds. Could be a rowdy night. That rain started to push its way eastwards. The rain not as persistent as it was last night. Heavy in places. The rain continues across parts of Northern England and scotland. Clear skies, winds later, mr fogg and issue into the morning but into the start of the day, the strength of the winds, persistence of the rain across southern counties of the rain across southern counties of england and wales which could cause a few issues for the morning commute. This area of low pressure, will move out of the way quite smartly. Going to be a morning feature across the southernmost counties, into east anglia, heavy rain, persistent rain for Northern England and southern scotland which eases through the day. Wednesday the day where skies will brighten and we will see sunshine come through. Scattered showers here and they are. In the sunshine, it should feel pleasant. Wednesday night into thursday, another batch of rain. These weather fronts, northern thursday, another batch of rain. These weatherfronts, northern half of the country, gusts uk wide. A wet and when the search for the eastern half of the country on thursday morning. That rain gets out of the way and something comes out but replaced by blustery showers. Towards western parts of the country, some parts becoming heavy with hail and thunder. Temperatures are Still Holding up at around 1719d but are Still Holding up at around 17 19d but we still have a blustery wind to take that fuel back little bit. More sunshine, sunday, more 02 58 45,178 4294966103 13 29,430 persistent rain and strong winds