according to the sudanese news agency. they are now being questioned a certain age military sources told outages 0 that they're not excluding the possibility a political organization was behind the co attempt. if morgan is in cartoon with more, there are also a lot of questions about which group exactly is behind this. and the purpose of the call was we do know back about 3 hours ago to more up to what seemed like a pretty normal morning with the exception of the one of the bridges eating to undermine which is one of which is the trend to be off the capital to one of those which is where blocks and that bridge leads to the onset of the military. now they were a couple of tank standing in front of the bridges, preventing civilians from crossing over. and they were a lot of by those people who are trying to cross the bridge as to why they would tanks. 1 in those 2 bridges, thank him to report that there was a who attend and that the soldiers were taking over the sample and that they wanted to take over the television and radio. canadian prime minister justin trudeau has been re elected following a snap election on monday. predictions show the ruling liberals will retain a minority in parliament pulling short of jose goal of a majority when as markets have steady, slightly made concerns about the possible collapse of a chinese property giant. ever ground is more than $300000000000.00 rather dollars in debt. an interest payment of $83000000.00 is choose this way. the french foreign minister says his country was blindsided by a submarine deal amounts last week between the u. s. s. trailer and the u. k. the packed cancelled a long running agreement with france and hundreds of construction workers of my sure, the astronomy and city of melbourne. after being told they must get vaccinated against the virus. the state government requires them to have at least one dose by the end of the wake. those are the headlines we'll have more on the attempted crew in sudan as it comes to hand. but for now, stay tuned for the stream. teaching those you can watch or english streaming live on. i do 2 channels plus thousands of our programs. award winning documentary and get new to port the subscribe to you choose dot com forward slash al jazeera english. ah. hi, i said the ok, welcome to the stream this week on the stream across all of our platforms, we are going to be following some of the big story, the big issues as united nations general assembly. today we're talking about governments and climate action, timely trust governments to act. if you're on youtube right now, you can be in a comment section, your thoughts still, i should try to put them right here. and you can be part of today's show. we kick up our conversation with hilda, who's the climate activist, and you got a come from one of the front lens. we need to make sure my claim id cases and we are unable to adapt to eat. we are suffering. okay. 6, we did not create any rain comes to the flood, raising what live was submerging buildings leaving many homeless, if not, did raising temperatures and more. why really does know exactly what needs to be done, but not willing to do because they should have planted the load needs and into for the fuel. we need to address the cut in the mission. thin increase here for just an inclusive 20 percent. for us, the most much malays, because we can draw in our experiences to offer solutions to engine claimant. so we start our conversation with our panel. so in misery. co so good to have you all here at the stream, so please introduce yourself to stream viewers around the world. thank you so much for me. my name is sam with heart, the special advisor for claimant action to the 2nd general and assistant sector general for the climate action team. to agree to join the great to have you at ms rein, please say hello to stream audience and tell them who you are, what you do. hi everyone around the world. good morning, evening and also good afternoon. wherever you are watching us. my name is fine. i am from to them and i'm the chair of the us, the chris general advisory group on climate change. get to have here and hello, how are we can't do this conversation route. you hello audience, why? who you are and what you do? well, thank you for having me semi hello everyone. i'm co barrett, i'm one of the 3 i p. c. c, vice chairs. so the audience come misery. there was a big meeting today. it was a close meeting. leaders around the world were gathering. they were being very kind it and the to you i was saying, we need to take climate change. seriously. if you with miss rain, what would you have told those world leaders to actually get them to take more action? what would you said? what would have been your pet talk? well, i guess i would say that unfortunately, we've been more than core to that. thanks. re disgusting, something that already by science. and unfortunately, even most of the countries already ratified to the various agreements we still left behind when it comes to action. and i would tell them that our future that we'd be actually in dangerous, not only the future, but even even now, even the person that we are living in africa on one of the big country and our route where other areas of the world. and i was very critical because a lot, right, it doesn't really matter. now if you are coming from a developed countries or developing countries, because climate crisis, when kids are or how would bring your advice to those wildly that it would have been candid, unfiltered. what would you said? well, is there a better answer than what miss ranger said? and coming from the youth who are inheriting this earth that we are leaving for them? i think it's powerful, but i would say the earth is shouting, we need action. so when you were actually there, right, so was it close door because it was such an emergency and the world leaders had to be i'm just wondering whether the un secretary general gave them a dressing down. well yes, it was a closed door meeting. and the 2nd general contained this meeting, really because the reality is we are way off track and he wanted to instill a sense of urgency on the dire state of the climate process. and he also wanted to hear directly from leaders what they intend to bring to cop 26 in classical way of target on emissions reductions on finance, on support for adaptation. and the good news is that leaders agreed on the sense of urgency the need for higher levels off ambition. and hopefully that will translate into increased more ambitious commitments as we had towards grad school in the next 4 weeks and weeks. or yeah, you say you say hopefully there's not much time between now what is known as cop 26, a big climate conference. it's happening in glasgow, people who are in the climate. so just take off go now that he would say got $26.00 . he's the secretary general just a few days ago. you feel the sense of urgency of he's speaking, have a look, have a lesson unless there are immediate rapid and large scale reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. we will be unable to limit the global heating to $1.00 degrees celsius and the consequences will be catastrophic. comp 26, these november must mark their turning point by then we need all countries to commit to achieve necessarily emissions by the middle of the century and present clear, credible, long term saturdays to get this. i am wondering if this is incredibly incredibly frustrating for you. the sciences there, we know, and we've known for a very long time, decades as a fine test. what is this moment like for you? you know, for me, it's not frustrating for me. i feel like society in general and governments are listening to the science like they never have before. sure, it's hard because the message is dire. i mean, you know, earth is likely hotter now than it has been in any moment since the last ice age. 125000 years ago, every decade in the last 40 years has been warmer than the one before. so the evidence is now team. but i'm not frustrated. i'm optimistic. i think people are taking the science seriously and it should spar action. i'm going to play uri for you, i. so when he's a climate scientists, i'm going to play him to and then ask you, then how do you tell what he says that science into policy and action? his yury. we already live on a change planet that has warmed by more than one degree celsius and where we are now experiencing the devastating impacts of flops, he twins or wildfires. science can now attribute these changes to our human activities in our greenhouse gases. that means we also know what we need to do to avoid this on getting worse. greenhouse gases need to be reduced as need be as possible, and carbon dioxide needs to be reduced to 0. so when can you explain to us why he's so difficult to get governments to actually have a climate change policy? we don't even have any red flags anymore. it's just the climate is changing in every single continent around the world. why is this difficult? so when well, it's a very complex issue. the science is extremely clear. as you reset, of course, said of his mystery said government, no. what did need to do? we need to cut emissions for about 45 percent below 2010 levels by 2030 and achieve that 0 emissions by 2050. but we're not seeing the national commitments. we're not seeing national commitments from government, but the level of ambition that is required or in line with the sites. yeah. and the reality is that countries see this as difficult. hard choices need to be made. it means transformation of energy systems. it means transformation of transport systems, which is, which is very expensive, especially in the money sell in if it's just about money in history and in this amazing it's diane to interject and if you need adjustments. so when you pick up off the back of the go ahead, we just, we just too cheap to say about planet misery and i think so. and so the, i think that's why he think that's actually but i think anyone who have mine inside of their head knows that it's the money. it's an interest issue. it's not easy to auction. it's called a whole it does she like the problem? it would induct street, they control a lot of sectors. they actually even support a lot of sectors. they support sometimes the health sector. they even support some of the election companies are the world leaders nowadays? so money improve interest. this is the triangle that actually taught the profit from happening. simply how to issue. it's complicated. why the razor is very obvious. it's interest and well bowan. yes. leadership by governments is absolutely critical. and we need governments to take the lead in 2nd grade, clear climate commitments, target. some policies are government can't do this alone. as miss reed said, we need the voices of young people who must advocate for their future. who must be these are young people whose future will be jeopardized, will not be able to realize their full potential every don't address the climate crisis. what we need to also order leaders to leaders signed on to the purchase agreement leaders committee to pursue the $1.00 degree goal of the pirates agreement, current commitments, place us at $2.00 degrees celsius. this is next set to, they're not living up to their commitment. so in your life, can i just just in just really obviously what, what the pages were and what we're actually seeing right now have a look on my laptop. hey, this is to thought to great graphic is a terrible graphic, but really easy to see. so this is a climate action tracker. this is a 1.5 celsius paris agreement who is compatible gambia 11 place. and then almost that all i said, agreeing to cutting the emissions and what they promised them, what they've delivered, called 3 can if you can you morocco, nepal, nigeria, the u. k. insufficient, you can see all of these areas around here. look at this, the you view opinion as not even one country that many there usa here, highly insufficient, huge list here. and then critically insufficient russia, saudi arabia, thailand, there were promises and those promises have not been delivered. let's talk about the impact that's actually happening down on the grants missing. good. you go 1st and i'm not, i'm going to bring him glad. he's also a young climate activist seeing thoughts read the diagram again. i just want to show you something that's actually go ahead. it's here, it's ready yet that countries who does the question and you see, and the almost sufficient all of what you came out of the following country. they are from them, from the lower emission, isn't that amazing? the countries are probably meeting the least are doing the most work and the 3 and just did that because because she's, she's almost diplomatic herself. she said in d. c nationally determined contributions. that is the promise that was a promise that was made during the parents agreement. and then whether they actually deliver, i want to bring him live here. miss. really find my, i'm going to play lie to you. because a lot he's talking about climate change. it's happening right now where he lives. have a listen, have a look my own community, because i don't know if you don't climate change through the fate of the minister where we get 80 percent of our portable work. unfortunately, it is traditional the nice, there is the grading with every single year, and there is no end in sight so far. and you said independent and scores on how the parents agreement is progressing in this field. unfortunately, the recent data shows that we are at best 50 percent way there, but we are still on the way to allow a war means that could be more than 2 and a half degrees. there is still a lot more action, require a lot more commitment and a lot more finance to feel this commitment as well. so co the risk assessment from the into government puddle supply might change was that we all i to code read for humanity. there is no obscure language there. what does that mean in terms of the science? what are we seeing right now that is deeply, deeply scary? well, 1st i'll say that stories like the one shared by blood, our stories that we are seeing all across the globe. i mean, look at this is summer heat waves, drought fires, floods that like what we're seeing here across the globe recently is exactly what we envision to be typical of global warming. and they are also directly caused by global warming. so the report goes into detail about how the earth has warmed and how it's projected to warm in the future. it talks about how we are now able to attribute human influences to the climate extremes that we're seeing. the science finds that the next 10 to 20 years are critical, really, to getting the problem under control, we not continue to put off rapid and transformational action. the good news is though, if we strengthen our resolved an act now it's not too late to forestall. many of the most dire consequences reducing every ton of carbon pollution and avoiding every fraction of a degree of warming will not only lessen the harm over the next few decades. but we will reverberate for centuries to come. i am going to ask all, if you get to do a speed round, we have she advance on youtube right now. we have the question, and i want to instant answer from all 3 of you. if i may developed countries hom, the environment most, how do we convince the carbon emission giants to change? instant soft arthur, misery, new star? well, renewable energy, renewables, these, there is a big data mar regarding what to do right now. when you have an energy. so is a way, way to get the energy. unfortunately, the manufacturing of renewable energy materials are in your energy equipment yet not very cream green. so i think we should do green renewable energy at this reduce a lot of, of the mission. it will also reduce the inequality because actually we recently, i'm our is a great tools to do so in this is your entire job. how did, how did you persuade the carbon emission giants to change is what she balance. aust, he's what do you right now? will also you going to give him? well, my answer, it's in the economic interests of countries to, to be more ambitious on climate action. renewable energy in most parts of the world is much cheaper than coal power. and in many instances, fossil fuel, power, generation, and energy emissions account for 3 fourths of total emission. so it's in the economic interest. it makes good business sense for country company, for a city to be ambitious on climate change and to go greet making west i wow. what would you say? i would actually agree with what in the serene side and add to it a little bit. you know, this is an incredible opportunity for us to transform our economies. and we've already seen it with renewable energy solar and when prices are going down and it's so much more affordable, we just need to take that kind of action and apply it to transport. city, agriculture and, and kind of bring ourselves into the future here. it's time i would even go home if i me say that we should find a grow for the already fall up country. why and have the i actually involvement in the under development or the development countries. the growth is kerry story for a lot of people, but when you make it them, it makes a lot of sense. because if i ask someone, do you prepared to leave you all happy and healthy life, or do you prefer you guys and the guy bridge? i think most of us, which are no healthy life and have a wealthy live with a low medical help implications. economic, an implication, infrastructure implications and so on. so i guess the growth is a scary idea for a lot of people. we might find it the only way, the only solution to actually reduce the richard that are already put the in the, in the planet. the a couple of weeks ago, guess the thing looked at the climate emergency and some of the climate activism that was happening, particularly a group called extension rebellion where they are taking app climate crises so seriously that they're using a very specific kind of protest. but i'm not sure we had rupert read i we had. c a prediction about 26. remember that big climate change conference it's happening in scotland in november. haven't listen, have a look to what he said. and he told us on the stream a few weeks ago, and believable a pulling in action on this for such a long time. we're now moving to a moment when that could change, which is the cock. go big, big climate conference in november. but i'm going to say something on comes up as century now and controversial, which is that back conference is virtually bound to fail. it will fail us as they failed us. previously, even the parents agreement in 2015, which was an amazing diplomatic achievement, is a paper tiger. and we're on course for if we stick to the parents agreement, where on course, even then civilizational meltdown. so the bottom line is that there are no adults. there is no cavalry writing to the rescue and really a crucial message that i would like to give to everyone watching tonight who was thinking, what can i do, or what should we do in this situation? is we need to act on this together. and we need to act on it with our expectation that our governments are going to save us some to the risk. wow. ok. i show me when that happened on the stream. so in that i've seen a few of them for $26.00. i've seen a lot of cynicism for 26 and it's almost like the last chart saloon. are we putting a lot of pressure on our governments to be out to come up with something that he's actually going to change where we are right now? so we thought cop $26.00. yes, i just talked to gerald said it this morning that if we don't change course, there is a high risk or failure at court 26. and he as being very clear in terms of what needs to happen, countries need to put more ambitious national national commitments on the table. the need to increase the climate finance that they're provided to developing countries. and they also need to support bud rubble. developing countries are also, or on the front of the climate crisis, with finance, in order to better adopt and build regions to climate change. but the reality is we have 5 weeks left. we need to use every day between now and 26 to get countries to be more ambitious and i'm not ready to give up yet. the 2nd general is not ready to give up. yet. the beauty of the parse agreement is that, you know, it's not a perfect agreement when it's our best hope of having the climate emergency. i like allows countries to submit periodically there the national commitment. and we've seen countries increase half countries, represented half of global emissions have submitted in dcs. and these indices hub, our sort, these national commitments, no acronym. and these national our lead have lead to a reduction in emissions of around 12 percent. it's not enough. it's not enough, but every, every single ton of carbon, every single degree ads, every single ton of carbon that is, we use or avoid it helps us to get closer to $1.00. we're not there yet. there are 20 countries that represent 80 percent of global emissions. we need these countries to meet. what needs to happen next are funny that we ask teresa addison and this is what she told us. let's be frank, the world isn't on track to meet the paris agreement targets even to limit women to $1.00 degrees or to provide enough climate finance to developing countries. so if we're to have a successful call $26.00, we need to see movement in 3 key areas. firstly, we need to see governments, particularly the wealthiest solution. governments have done the most to cause the climate crisis. taking far more action to be transformative, to be radical, in fact, to start polluting and to reduce their own greenhouse gas emissions at national level. so can we, we need to see those same governments providing far more time finance to lower income countries. and thirdly, we need those governments that developing the international policy frameworks at cop $26.00 common negotiations to really close loopholes to greenwashing and to protect the rights of those on the frontline of the climate crisis. so thank you to i guess. thank you teresa selwyn, misery and co for being, i guess to day and for sharing your knowledge in your insights on can governments take action? i feel that they are optimistic, perhaps more optimistic than our audience watching. thanks for watching. i'll see you next time. take care everybody. ah al jazeera recounts the shocking story of the assassination of count full cabana dot. the 1st you an envoy trying to bring peace to the middle east. how is negotiations with himmler health, save thousands of jews from nazi concentration camps and how these mediation skills put him at the vanguard in the quest for peace in the middle east? killing the count on algebra, russellville, and southern england, where 2 farmers turn safari park. pioneers fits the attractive nature in the driving seat. i was just absolutely astonishing the life, the poor, back even the very 1st life. and miguel sophie, i cynthia when one by your company revolutionizing the system you think planned an artificial intelligence here in flight. you have science, you have the right phone, al jazeera, the news news news with me. ah, sedan sovereign council says the co attempt has been contained in the situation is now under control. will be live in cartoon to the very like ah, hello, i'm emily angland. this is al jazeera alive from dough house. coming up. i see canadians standing together together in your determination to end this and demick and narrow win for just introduce the canadian prime minister maintained his minority governor.

Related Keywords

Glasgow , Glasgow City , United Kingdom , Afghanistan , United States , Paris , France General , France , China , Melbourne , Victoria , Australia , Canada , Russia , Gambia , Thailand , Nigeria , Sudan , Morocco , Nepal , Saudi Arabia , America , Sudanese , Canadian , French , Chinese , Scotland , Teresa Addison , Justin Trudeau , Teresa Selwyn , Ahal Jazeera , Miguel Sophie ,