Transcripts For ALJAZ Inside Story 2017 Ep 360 20171228 : co

Push out Robert Mugabe has been sworn in as Vice President constantino un go will share the role with kember mahdi a long serving state security minister tired from the military last week. Those are your headlines the more news continuing here on aljazeera thats after inside story to stay with us. Generous normal for the u. S. Is cutting the United Nations budget by more than a quarter of a billion dollars but why is washington squeezing the un and what are the long term implications of this caught this is inside story. Hello and welcome to the program about two hundred eighty five Million Dollars thats the amount expected to be slashed from the u. N. Operating budget next year the United States says its negotiates have a cut to eliminate what it calls inefficiency and overspending by the organization the u. S. Ambassador to the United Nations nikki haley said we will no longer let the generosity of the American People be taken advantage of or remain unchecked well continue to look at ways to increase the u. N. Ziff efficiency while protecting our interests the move comes off to a tense week for the u. N. The General Assembly voted to condemn the u. S. Decision to recognize jerusalem as israels capital and move its embassy haley responded by threatening to cut funding to the u. N. America will put our embassy in jerusalem that is what the American People want us to do and it is the right thing to do. No vote in the United Nations will make any difference on that but this vote will make a difference on how americans look at the u. N. And on how we look at countries who disrespect us in the un President Donald Trump has long been critical of the United Nations almost exactly a year ago before officially taking office his waited the United Nations has such a Great Potential but right now its just a club for people to get together talk and have a good time so. That comment really underscores trumps decision now to scale back on an organization the u. S. Has played an influential role in since it was founded in one nine hundred forty five their official headquarters were set up in manhattan in new york it seats the main part of the un including the General Assembly and Security Council the u. S. Is one of five permanent members of the Security Council along with china france russia and the u. K. All five have veto power the u. S. Is of course the largest financial contributor to the u. N. Providing twenty two percent of its regular budget thats well had of the other member countries japan comes in second with ten percent followed by china germany france and the u. K. Lets bring in our guests joining us from it ima Peter Anthony gatto former u. N. Investigator in common with england by sky ross a friedman professor of law and Global Development at the university of reading and in delaware in the United States of america by skype Lawrence Korb former assistant secretary of defense and senior fellow at the center for American Progress welcome to you all let me start by asking mr korb this do you think that slashing the u. S. Contribution to the u. N. Is trump saying im delivering on a Campaign Promise or is he just delivering on a threat he made following the United Nations General Assembly vote on jerusalem. I think its a combination of two and as you pointed out he did say that the un wastes a lot of money during the campaign and then when they had a vote on on approving the us setting up its embassy in in jerusalem he said if that doesnt go the way we want well you dont take a look so its a combination of two what is important to keep in mind its not cutting the u. N. U. S. Contribution its cutting the whole all for the u. N. Budget by you know two hundred eighty five million Million Dollars the u. S. Pays you know about twenty two percent of that so this is only going to save you if you know i can use that term the u. S. About sixty Million Dollars miss friedman how significant is this decision i mean to cut the over the whole budget by almost a quarter of a billion dollars well lets be clear the secretary general announced in october that the budget would be cut by two hundred Million Dollars much of which was going to be taken from the haiti peacekeeping budget because the peacekeeping mission has now been changed into the rule of no mission and from the peacekeeping operations into whole as well as administrative cats hadnt the u. S. In june had wanted actually to produce its funding to the u. N. And significantly and congress voted that down so that she the amounts of money were talking about hit almost as big as donald trump is trying to make out and these arent such new plans and in the way that hes trying to posture this a gallo this is something that comes against the backdrop as we said with the latest statements made by the u. N. Ambassador to the u. S. Ambassador to the u. N. And also the last from saying that we would keep watching the u. N. And we will act accordingly is that the gypsum a to use the power of influence to try to enforce change in an organization like the United Nations or do you think that using course of measures could solve backfire in the near future. And i think that all the Member States use a degree of course of measures one way or the other to bend the the u. N. To the political will that they wish to pursue i dont see that the United States is being any different whatsoever in this regard its just that the u. S. The u. N. Relies very heavily on american tax dollars and theyve on this occasion they have a president who has essentially the interests of the u. S. Taxpayer at heart. Miss a call the u. S. President has said in the past that. The u. N. Is a social club and that its been hijacked by people with. Big friends of the United States of america i mean were talking about half a billion dollars is this something which is going to have an Significant Impact on the running operations of the United Nations and particularly its peacekeeping missions around the world. Well the peacekeeping budget is separate from the budget and they cut they cut the overall un budget so you know that budget is about seven billion dollars a year of which the United States contributes about twenty eight percent but we dont really have you know many peacekeeping forces involved in all the nations or do we not which protect our interests and this whole idea that somehow the u. N. Doesnt support our policies makes no sense right after this the blow up over the when the embassy to jerusalem and the vote on not right after that the United Nations voted the Security Council to put more sanctions on south korea i mean on north korea not a biggest threat to the United States in the world right now. Ms friedman i mean theres no question everyone is talking about the need to tighten the belt of the United Nations i mean and to tackle the issues of mismanagement and. Mismanagement but how can you implement the reform of the United Nations was on the priorities because each and every major countries talking about different set of priorities. Well lets be clear all of the major donors are constantly trying to reduce the un budget japan tries to china particularly around the human rights budget tries to reduce down the money given but at the same time the hundred ninety three Member States its the u. N. To be fit for purpose and to be able to provide solutions to current challenges and only one of the key areas of reform is to try and look at what are the challenges today around climate displacement internal wars the way that governments wage wars on their own people robin transnational wars and any reform of the United Nations in any changes to budget has to be done within our right to watch whats coming and whats limaye not whats happened over the last seven decades and all the successes the u. N. Has achieved over that time as were talking about a new political order a new era of fast moving situation around the globe what do you think should be the top priority is it Climate Change is it the technological reform is it education is it and in conflict and autocracy in the different parts of the world what should be the top priority for the us right now the those are International Diplomatic and political questions i. Wouldnt like to you know venture an opinion on but i think theres a danger here that were confusing the you know the the political with the administrative the cuts to the un budget are not going to have a significant effect on the politics of the Member States what they will do is have an an effect whether to significant or otherwise they will have an effect on the running of the un secretary at what the budget cuts have done has given the secretary general the problem of how to make savings and the culture of the un being what it is that actually is very difficult for who theyre not used to it the manager ariel abilities within the organizations or are not geared towards making savings. Yes of course but since were talking about. A slash that could potentially affect the administrative aspect of the part of the United Nations many people are still concerned that against the backdrop of the general sentiment pushing for a massive overhaul of the United Nations people are concerned that ultimately ultimately those who would be affected by the end of the day would be the conflicts that were seeing flaring up in different parts of the worlds. Well theres no doubt about it in fact if you were to tell most americans how much the u. N. Budget is they would probably say six or seven hundred billion dollars its five billion dollars a little so its not that much when youve got as our colleague said got one hundred ninety three nations the problems that it deals with i just mentioned north korea all the peacekeeping operations around the world if those are not going well you would have more terrorism youd have more threats i think what we need to do as the United States as though you know the leader of the world is emphasize what we get for the money and the idea that were paying too much is not queered got about twenty five twenty eight percent of the worlds Gross Domestic Product we contribute twenty two percent to the. U. N. Budget the e. U. In total contributes four they contribute thirty percent so this idea that you know i think if you want to tell america is a think course funding it almost all of it and its one hundred billion dollars now its a great bargain is it inefficient yes every government operation is inefficient i used to work in the pentagon you know we were you know we were not known for efficiency but those brave men and women can go out and you know perform well on the battlefield ok miss friedman i mean what is the problem here is that the need for the u. N. To reinvent itself or the the u. N. To recognize they has failed to tackle issues of spending and met as many of the funds allocated to it. At i agree with both of my colleagues on this that the problem isnt the activities that you went on to take to undertake really important what that that saves lives and that makes about a better and safer place russell to live in yes their rents within the secretary at home with them funds programs and agencies yes people shouldnt have to have the choice to travel Business Class when that flying a few short hours away yes its a very strange culture when no one ever gets fired from the United Nations but not now its about addressing the internal problems which shaving two hundred eighty five Million Dollars from the budget wont address those internal problems and needs to be an organizational change in a culture change to address those problems whats going to end up happening is that that money will be taken away from very much needed activities around the world rather than being used to ensure that the pensions arent far higher than pensions you would find in Public Sector elsewhere. Its a gallo as of a youve been a United Nations investigator from your experience in the phil de a think that the issue now is for the un to give more power to the biro zone the stuff which is deployed in different parts of the wells give them more say in running their own operations and their own budget you know its not a question of giving them power its a question of holding them accountable for the power that they already have. The sick the sums that question in the great scheme of things are not really significant the un budget is running at thirteen point four billion dollars not all organizations lose money to fraud waste and abuse if thats only running at ten percent were still talking about a fraud risk to the tune of one point three billion dollars a year two hundred eighty five its basically twenty percent of that and its not the its not the control from the the top thats the problem its the count ability for the money that is spent to the decisions that are made of the solution to every problem presented to the secretary at his office to create more posts and more positions on another Committee Without actually ever dealing with the substance of the problem that is there because that would actually require a decision the un is very good for administration of plenty of administration thats just no management but then this brings us back to the question of how to move forward i mean how to implement the. Miss a call the Decision Making process in the United Nations is controlled by the five men permanent members of the a Security Council and each country has different agendas different say about how to move forward and wettest of the thought that the reform of the un doesnt this leave us with with a big hurdle well i think you know in terms of what we can do is maybe have the five permanent members bring in an outside you know firm to take a look at the efficiency of the operation and suggest some costs but the way in which President Trump is approaching it basically says the United States is not getting you know its moneys worth here the United States is paying more than its fair share those things i think need to be be emphasized yes is there inefficiencies we want in a Management Consulting firm maybe we could find things we just did in the pentagon we brought in a defense business war and we found out there were actually twenty five billion dollars a year on exercise. Overhead maybe the u. N. Is doing that but you dont want to cut into the Core Missions and the idea as my colleague joe said if you count the regular budget in the peacekeeping you know budget its you know thirteen billion dollars a year thats pretty good particularly when you include all of the peacekeeping there thats a pretty good bargain for the money compared to some of the other things that you that you have to spend money on so i think it would be good to bring in this outside group what im take a look at maybe suggest some of vision sees but we need to emphasize were the ones who started this in the United States and the idea that somehow or another it doesnt support our interests is not true do they agree with us or never think course not that no they dont agree with that a country overall well the fact of the how to reduce it has been good for us yes this for them and this comes at a time also when emerging powers say that they would like to join the club of the the permanent members of the Security Council and that their presence would be an added value to the United Nations that could bring forth. Genuine reform to the to the International Body do you think that this could be the case i think theres a fundamental misunderstanding about when the power lies in the u. N. And of course the five permanent members have the power within the Security Council but the fifth committee that controls the budget has great power at the United Nations and weve seen recently festival with the votes on the Robert Mugabe<\/a> has been sworn in as Vice President<\/a> constantino un go will share the role with kember mahdi a long serving state security minister tired from the military last week. Those are your headlines the more news continuing here on aljazeera thats after inside story to stay with us. Generous normal for the u. S. Is cutting the United Nations<\/a> budget by more than a quarter of a billion dollars but why is washington squeezing the un and what are the long term implications of this caught this is inside story. Hello and welcome to the program about two hundred eighty five Million Dollars<\/a> thats the amount expected to be slashed from the u. N. Operating budget next year the United States<\/a> says its negotiates have a cut to eliminate what it calls inefficiency and overspending by the organization the u. S. Ambassador to the United Nations<\/a> nikki haley said we will no longer let the generosity of the American People<\/a> be taken advantage of or remain unchecked well continue to look at ways to increase the u. N. Ziff efficiency while protecting our interests the move comes off to a tense week for the u. N. The General Assembly<\/a> voted to condemn the u. S. Decision to recognize jerusalem as israels capital and move its embassy haley responded by threatening to cut funding to the u. N. America will put our embassy in jerusalem that is what the American People<\/a> want us to do and it is the right thing to do. No vote in the United Nations<\/a> will make any difference on that but this vote will make a difference on how americans look at the u. N. And on how we look at countries who disrespect us in the un President Donald Trump<\/a> has long been critical of the United Nations<\/a> almost exactly a year ago before officially taking office his waited the United Nations<\/a> has such a Great Potential<\/a> but right now its just a club for people to get together talk and have a good time so. That comment really underscores trumps decision now to scale back on an organization the u. S. Has played an influential role in since it was founded in one nine hundred forty five their official headquarters were set up in manhattan in new york it seats the main part of the un including the General Assembly<\/a> and Security Council<\/a> the u. S. Is one of five permanent members of the Security Council<\/a> along with china france russia and the u. K. All five have veto power the u. S. Is of course the largest financial contributor to the u. N. Providing twenty two percent of its regular budget thats well had of the other member countries japan comes in second with ten percent followed by china germany france and the u. K. Lets bring in our guests joining us from it ima Peter Anthony<\/a> gatto former u. N. Investigator in common with england by sky ross a friedman professor of law and Global Development<\/a> at the university of reading and in delaware in the United States<\/a> of america by skype Lawrence Korb<\/a> former assistant secretary of defense and senior fellow at the center for American Progress<\/a> welcome to you all let me start by asking mr korb this do you think that slashing the u. S. Contribution to the u. N. Is trump saying im delivering on a Campaign Promise<\/a> or is he just delivering on a threat he made following the United Nations<\/a> General Assembly<\/a> vote on jerusalem. I think its a combination of two and as you pointed out he did say that the un wastes a lot of money during the campaign and then when they had a vote on on approving the us setting up its embassy in in jerusalem he said if that doesnt go the way we want well you dont take a look so its a combination of two what is important to keep in mind its not cutting the u. N. U. S. Contribution its cutting the whole all for the u. N. Budget by you know two hundred eighty five million Million Dollars<\/a> the u. S. Pays you know about twenty two percent of that so this is only going to save you if you know i can use that term the u. S. About sixty Million Dollars<\/a> miss friedman how significant is this decision i mean to cut the over the whole budget by almost a quarter of a billion dollars well lets be clear the secretary general announced in october that the budget would be cut by two hundred Million Dollars<\/a> much of which was going to be taken from the haiti peacekeeping budget because the peacekeeping mission has now been changed into the rule of no mission and from the peacekeeping operations into whole as well as administrative cats hadnt the u. S. In june had wanted actually to produce its funding to the u. N. And significantly and congress voted that down so that she the amounts of money were talking about hit almost as big as donald trump is trying to make out and these arent such new plans and in the way that hes trying to posture this a gallo this is something that comes against the backdrop as we said with the latest statements made by the u. N. Ambassador to the u. S. Ambassador to the u. N. And also the last from saying that we would keep watching the u. N. And we will act accordingly is that the gypsum a to use the power of influence to try to enforce change in an organization like the United Nations<\/a> or do you think that using course of measures could solve backfire in the near future. And i think that all the Member States<\/a> use a degree of course of measures one way or the other to bend the the u. N. To the political will that they wish to pursue i dont see that the United States<\/a> is being any different whatsoever in this regard its just that the u. S. The u. N. Relies very heavily on american tax dollars and theyve on this occasion they have a president who has essentially the interests of the u. S. Taxpayer at heart. Miss a call the u. S. President has said in the past that. The u. N. Is a social club and that its been hijacked by people with. Big friends of the United States<\/a> of america i mean were talking about half a billion dollars is this something which is going to have an Significant Impact<\/a> on the running operations of the United Nations<\/a> and particularly its peacekeeping missions around the world. Well the peacekeeping budget is separate from the budget and they cut they cut the overall un budget so you know that budget is about seven billion dollars a year of which the United States<\/a> contributes about twenty eight percent but we dont really have you know many peacekeeping forces involved in all the nations or do we not which protect our interests and this whole idea that somehow the u. N. Doesnt support our policies makes no sense right after this the blow up over the when the embassy to jerusalem and the vote on not right after that the United Nations<\/a> voted the Security Council<\/a> to put more sanctions on south korea i mean on north korea not a biggest threat to the United States<\/a> in the world right now. Ms friedman i mean theres no question everyone is talking about the need to tighten the belt of the United Nations<\/a> i mean and to tackle the issues of mismanagement and. Mismanagement but how can you implement the reform of the United Nations<\/a> was on the priorities because each and every major countries talking about different set of priorities. Well lets be clear all of the major donors are constantly trying to reduce the un budget japan tries to china particularly around the human rights budget tries to reduce down the money given but at the same time the hundred ninety three Member States<\/a> its the u. N. To be fit for purpose and to be able to provide solutions to current challenges and only one of the key areas of reform is to try and look at what are the challenges today around climate displacement internal wars the way that governments wage wars on their own people robin transnational wars and any reform of the United Nations<\/a> in any changes to budget has to be done within our right to watch whats coming and whats limaye not whats happened over the last seven decades and all the successes the u. N. Has achieved over that time as were talking about a new political order a new era of fast moving situation around the globe what do you think should be the top priority is it Climate Change<\/a> is it the technological reform is it education is it and in conflict and autocracy in the different parts of the world what should be the top priority for the us right now the those are International Diplomatic<\/a> and political questions i. Wouldnt like to you know venture an opinion on but i think theres a danger here that were confusing the you know the the political with the administrative the cuts to the un budget are not going to have a significant effect on the politics of the Member States<\/a> what they will do is have an an effect whether to significant or otherwise they will have an effect on the running of the un secretary at what the budget cuts have done has given the secretary general the problem of how to make savings and the culture of the un being what it is that actually is very difficult for who theyre not used to it the manager ariel abilities within the organizations or are not geared towards making savings. Yes of course but since were talking about. A slash that could potentially affect the administrative aspect of the part of the United Nations<\/a> many people are still concerned that against the backdrop of the general sentiment pushing for a massive overhaul of the United Nations<\/a> people are concerned that ultimately ultimately those who would be affected by the end of the day would be the conflicts that were seeing flaring up in different parts of the worlds. Well theres no doubt about it in fact if you were to tell most americans how much the u. N. Budget is they would probably say six or seven hundred billion dollars its five billion dollars a little so its not that much when youve got as our colleague said got one hundred ninety three nations the problems that it deals with i just mentioned north korea all the peacekeeping operations around the world if those are not going well you would have more terrorism youd have more threats i think what we need to do as the United States<\/a> as though you know the leader of the world is emphasize what we get for the money and the idea that were paying too much is not queered got about twenty five twenty eight percent of the worlds Gross Domestic Product<\/a> we contribute twenty two percent to the. U. N. Budget the e. U. In total contributes four they contribute thirty percent so this idea that you know i think if you want to tell america is a think course funding it almost all of it and its one hundred billion dollars now its a great bargain is it inefficient yes every government operation is inefficient i used to work in the pentagon you know we were you know we were not known for efficiency but those brave men and women can go out and you know perform well on the battlefield ok miss friedman i mean what is the problem here is that the need for the u. N. To reinvent itself or the the u. N. To recognize they has failed to tackle issues of spending and met as many of the funds allocated to it. At i agree with both of my colleagues on this that the problem isnt the activities that you went on to take to undertake really important what that that saves lives and that makes about a better and safer place russell to live in yes their rents within the secretary at home with them funds programs and agencies yes people shouldnt have to have the choice to travel Business Class<\/a> when that flying a few short hours away yes its a very strange culture when no one ever gets fired from the United Nations<\/a> but not now its about addressing the internal problems which shaving two hundred eighty five Million Dollars<\/a> from the budget wont address those internal problems and needs to be an organizational change in a culture change to address those problems whats going to end up happening is that that money will be taken away from very much needed activities around the world rather than being used to ensure that the pensions arent far higher than pensions you would find in Public Sector<\/a> elsewhere. Its a gallo as of a youve been a United Nations<\/a> investigator from your experience in the phil de a think that the issue now is for the un to give more power to the biro zone the stuff which is deployed in different parts of the wells give them more say in running their own operations and their own budget you know its not a question of giving them power its a question of holding them accountable for the power that they already have. The sick the sums that question in the great scheme of things are not really significant the un budget is running at thirteen point four billion dollars not all organizations lose money to fraud waste and abuse if thats only running at ten percent were still talking about a fraud risk to the tune of one point three billion dollars a year two hundred eighty five its basically twenty percent of that and its not the its not the control from the the top thats the problem its the count ability for the money that is spent to the decisions that are made of the solution to every problem presented to the secretary at his office to create more posts and more positions on another Committee Without<\/a> actually ever dealing with the substance of the problem that is there because that would actually require a decision the un is very good for administration of plenty of administration thats just no management but then this brings us back to the question of how to move forward i mean how to implement the. Miss a call the Decision Making<\/a> process in the United Nations<\/a> is controlled by the five men permanent members of the a Security Council<\/a> and each country has different agendas different say about how to move forward and wettest of the thought that the reform of the un doesnt this leave us with with a big hurdle well i think you know in terms of what we can do is maybe have the five permanent members bring in an outside you know firm to take a look at the efficiency of the operation and suggest some costs but the way in which President Trump<\/a> is approaching it basically says the United States<\/a> is not getting you know its moneys worth here the United States<\/a> is paying more than its fair share those things i think need to be be emphasized yes is there inefficiencies we want in a Management Consulting<\/a> firm maybe we could find things we just did in the pentagon we brought in a defense business war and we found out there were actually twenty five billion dollars a year on exercise. Overhead maybe the u. N. Is doing that but you dont want to cut into the Core Missions<\/a> and the idea as my colleague joe said if you count the regular budget in the peacekeeping you know budget its you know thirteen billion dollars a year thats pretty good particularly when you include all of the peacekeeping there thats a pretty good bargain for the money compared to some of the other things that you that you have to spend money on so i think it would be good to bring in this outside group what im take a look at maybe suggest some of vision sees but we need to emphasize were the ones who started this in the United States<\/a> and the idea that somehow or another it doesnt support our interests is not true do they agree with us or never think course not that no they dont agree with that a country overall well the fact of the how to reduce it has been good for us yes this for them and this comes at a time also when emerging powers say that they would like to join the club of the the permanent members of the Security Council<\/a> and that their presence would be an added value to the United Nations<\/a> that could bring forth. Genuine reform to the to the International Body<\/a> do you think that this could be the case i think theres a fundamental misunderstanding about when the power lies in the u. N. And of course the five permanent members have the power within the Security Council<\/a> but the fifth committee that controls the budget has great power at the United Nations<\/a> and weve seen recently festival with the votes on the International Court<\/a> of justice charge more recently in terms of the Jerusalem Vote<\/a> last week in the General Assembly<\/a> that this significant jack lets go how are we being the General Assembly<\/a> itself even if its not a binding body and i think that when that so much discussion focused only on Security Council<\/a> reform we forget the importance of all of the other parties and the roles that these emerging powers do play that so while its important to think about should germany sits at the Security Council<\/a> as a permanent member i should japans it that way to be to with out of each of these or any tinkering or. On the edges if we want to think about reforming the un as a whole scandal operation we need to look at all of the main organs and we also need to look at the secretary at and how we appoint the secretary general because in were talking about management and accountability and transparency and leadership then the way that the sector generals being appointed and the recent appointments but this current one and the one before have not appointed people who are going to come in and really reform the body and hold to account the senior managers across the board of the Fund Programs<\/a> and agencies mr thomas the governor of the u. N. Has its Oversight Office<\/a> that looks into issues of mismanagement issues reports evaluates the situation across the globe ultimately the United Nations<\/a> General Assembly<\/a> is the one that has a huge power is country with one vote do you think that at this level the level of the u. N. G. A. We can stand the attempt to try to bring about more accountability to the way money is being spent within the United Nations<\/a> and pollute leave the. The General Assembly<\/a> does not actually get involved in the direct oversight of the supervision of the funds and programmes of the un secretary a toll and that is basically left to. You not to the secretary general and his senior staff and they are the ones who are the greatest obstacles to reform theyre the ones who have a vested interest in maintaining the situation as it is dealing with every problem by creating more seen your posts it is a selfperpetuating oligarchy and when the organization was set up in one thousand nine hundred five it was an entirely different creature what has happened in the years since is that de facto recognition as a state now is membership of the United Nations<\/a> so the idea that the un was an organization of the the peace peace loving democratic nations has basically passed into history. What we have now is a secretary at which is acting as a political entity and its own right and that was never what it was established to do the secretary general was number intended in the charter to be some kind of leading International Diplomat<\/a> he was the chief executive of the administration at a time when people are saying that if the un continue. Neglecting or denying the fact they faces massive problems other organizations but the Regional Organization<\/a> would just step in and fill in the void like like the African Union<\/a> for example which is now taking an aggressive role in areas where the u. N. Fail is something that could further erode the image of the un globally well theres no doubt about it and you have to ask yourself why are these Regional Organization<\/a>s stepping in can they handle a problem better or is it because the un is too inefficient or does not have the support that it that it needs what they can Work Together<\/a> i mean when we started to you when we did not have a lot of these Regional Organization<\/a> for example like the European Union<\/a> the African Union<\/a> what i think a good leader a good secretary general would be able to work with these organizations and get more efficiency by relying on them for things they can do better than the United Nations<\/a> can. This fridman i mean. The secretariat ended up being an institution of its own but this thing the need to start a better start a genuine reform but then ultimately isnt this something that raises the question of what kind of un we need for this new era is in this. The real problem that were facing right now i think a big problem is that the secretary at is there with one hundred ninety three buses but as as historically been said has become its own sort of political organ and makes its own decisions within that umbrella of what the hundred ninety three states tanel i ask it today but the secretary out in many ways this is stuck in the past is backward looking we see that reform only happens for example in peacekeeping where a massive atrocity or crisis happens and then the United Nations<\/a> has to look inward lakes think about rwanda yugoslavia and address why not crisis occurred there is only at that point that reform comes about in that we make serious changes that make significant improvements on the ground at the moment there are countries that are being severely impacted by Climate Change<\/a> thats big technological problems theres big internal un conflicts the government and yet the secretary at present faced a crisis point that will make it look internally and think about those reforms and as and in terms of the countries that are being affected rest of those dont have the jr political clout suppose for genuine reform within the secs area its a got to give us an idea about given your experience. Of the u. N. What is the problem is that when we are assigned to look into issues of mismanagement or irregulars irregularities you send your reports back is it shelved is it overlooked what is the problem why the mechanism does not seem to have a letter opener many of the many cases they simply dealing with inefficiencies it is the organization itself which is stifling the reform it is the organization itself it is which is not interested in looking for example a procurement fraud you want to make two hundred eighty five Million Dollars<\/a> worth of savings in the United Nations<\/a> you could do a lot worse than start simply on that question why is there the lack of interest in looking at the interface between the organization and the private side. After supplying the goods and services right there was the Procurement Task<\/a> force several years ago which was closed down for political reasons and the organization internally fell over itself in its enthusiasm to close down those cases that they already had more recently when my former office looked at cases in in somalia and were discovering fraud losses to the extent of seventy and eighty percent of the money being supplied to n. G. O. S in that country from the organizations was response was basically to drop it look the other way close those investigations are not move forward so the fact that there was money on that scale is not that its not this volume of the money which is being spent which is the problem in the u. N. Its the the location as much as where its going and somalia was a classic example of that we found evidence of u. N. Funds being embezzled or otherwise been diverted into a terrorist organization and the only thing the organization was interested in doing was suppressing that information because if it was revealed the Member States<\/a> would be less willing to donate funds into that per u. N. Secretary general attorney because i think accountability which i see your point the u. N. Secretary until you got to rest said that hes going to bring back accountability and transparency to the organization lets see how that will happen thank you very much indeed its Anthony Gallo<\/a> Russell Friedman<\/a> and Lawrence Korb<\/a> thank you for your contribution. And thank you too for watching you can see the program again any time by visiting our website dot com for further discussion go to our Facebook Page<\/a> thats facebook dot com for a slash a. J. Inside story you can also join the conversation on twitter our handle is a j inside story from me the whole team bye for now. But the sky should be no borders up here. Only horizons when as an airline we dont believe in boundaries we believe in bringing people together the worlds better that way. It is a right for all of us to go where we need to go to feel the things we want to feel. To see the people we want to see. Thats why well continue to fly the skies providing you with everything we can and treating everyone how they deserve to be treated we do this because we know the trouble goes beyond borders and prejudice. The travel teaches compassion the travel is a necessity. The travel is a right. Remember that this world is all of ours to explore. And its a strange thing for us to be a part. Cats are always going places together in the wake of the race riots how much can someone take before they crack the fight for recognition is crucial we needed the cool heads to prevail brothers in part its because a lot of them were people things that were certain that their religion and the things it was about their community was to be disrespected aljazeera explores the history and struggles of the Lebanese Community<\/a> in australia once upon a time in punchbowl at this time on aljazeera i really felt liberated as a journalist. Going to the truth as i would thats what the job. Youre watching algis there im still rather these are on top stories at least forty people","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"archive.org","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","width":"800","height":"600","url":"\/\/ia800401.us.archive.org\/18\/items\/ALJAZ_20171228_113200_Inside_Story_2017_Ep_360\/ALJAZ_20171228_113200_Inside_Story_2017_Ep_360.thumbs\/ALJAZ_20171228_113200_Inside_Story_2017_Ep_360_000001.jpg"}},"autauthor":{"@type":"Organization"},"author":{"sameAs":"archive.org","name":"archive.org"}}],"coverageEndTime":"20240630T12:35:10+00:00"}