This one, whats his name, will meet him at the ramp . Pistols, but then all sorts of nonsense, like the fact that he chose freedom and so on, motherfucker by the leg , duty officer, no sleep, cars at the entrance, urgently, by the end, maybe well still have time, motherfucker, come on, push, push, you you see that today there is only one airflot to paris, but it seems, like grandmas. The goats are in the garden, so why be in such a hurry, the Border Guards know, know what, zuev, first and last names, they dont have a photograph, but calm down, he might look under the name of ivan ivanov, someone, lets go. To the criminal investigation department, whats the matter, comrade may, the person who is under subscription, neva in the case of murder, will now go on honor back, back, back, samsonov, detain him, calmly, calmly, comrade, comrade, let him go, this is the lieutenant, criminal investigation, lets figure it out, do you have any papers to detain a criminal, no, okay, okay, lets go, you tell us everything in detail, the plane will fly away, dunces, just dont be nervous, just lets go, and who are you, actually, employees, its clear , dont, dont, im going myself, dont, put your hands away, yes, the volunteer arrived at the request of his heart, theres already one and a half here ive been here for a year, i dont want to change and leave, because my team is having a hard time without me, heres the dugout, the ground, the steps , wow, a washing machine, and this is the steam room, yes, yes, yes, yes, oh, guys, we are ready to destroy the enemy so much , how long will he come here for the premiere, special report, not a step back, on air a big game, rarely do different visions of the International Situation collide to such an extent as now, when we look at how the crisis between israel and palestine is approached, gas and, if i can say more specifically, how different leaders approach it, lets first listen to the position of president putin and president erdogan, the need for an immediate ceasefire by both sides and the resumption of the negotiation process. It was emphasized that a longterm peaceful settlement of the middle east crisis is possible solely on the basis of a twostate formula approved by the Un Security Council providing for the creation of an independent palestinian state within the 1967 borders with its capital in east jerusalem. That is, in other words, without in any way rejecting all unacceptability. The action of hamas, and when it comes to a longterm settlement, the leaders of russia and turkey focus on the palestinian problem, without the resolution of which they consider it impossible to stabilize the situation in this region. Heres what the us president says biden the department of defense has deployed a Carrier Strike group, expanded its fighter presence in the eastern mediterranean, and we stand ready to bring in Additional Forces as needed. Let me say again, any country, any organization, anyone who is thinking of taking advantage of this situation, dont do it, well, first of all, what struck me was not even their complete support for israel without any reservations, but just not can they refrain from making threats . Well, they cant, and russia hasnt done anything, why would they blame russia . They managed to accuse iran of not doing anything, jake salevan, biden S National Security assistant said that they have no evidence that iran was somehow involved in this operation, but they are already making threats, and for their threats to be, well, lets put it this way , more persuasive, one Carrier Group is not enough, from my point of view, careful, measured leaders, especially when you say, you remember, senators, that in the 506. Soviet crisis, president eisenhower not only did not want the United States to intervene, he demanded from great britain, france, israel, yes, its absolutely right that they stop their military operations, and i dont really imagine, against whom they are going to use two aircraft Carrier Groups, with hundreds of cruise missiles, by the way, against hamas, i dont know. But nevertheless, here are two world visions, two very clearly formulated positions , what to do next, you were, among other things, the representative of russia in the un, you are now the deputy chairman of the Federation Council committee on international affairs, as they say, you have the cards hands, it seems to me that the situation is very alarming, you you know, it seems so to everyone, except the un, i was also ambassador to egypt for two years, that was 20odd years ago, now is that period, with all its difficulties, then the second intifada began, there were problems, but i remember it as some kind of, you know, easy warmup against the background of what is happening now, and now of course, believe me, and excuse me for such simple words, but the feeling does not leave me. While no one sees a real logical way out of the situation that has developed today, a way out in such a strategic plan, our leader and those who agree with him, his interlocutors of recent days, suggest that we must return to the basics, we must return to those agreements that were the basis of the formula for resolving the middle east conflict, they were constantly violated , they were sometimes retreated from under the guise of such very good arguments, as was the case with the recent socalled auromic agreements during the trump presidency, but as we see, all this failed, everything failed, but here what to do today is, of course, a big question, but in any case , what not to do, this is more like some tangible reality, well, in particular, one, and then. A second Aircraft Carrier in the mediterranean sea, you know, this reminds me of the image from the Russian Proverb about the elephant in the china shop, in this small seaside one. Two aircraft Carrier Groups, why, for what . Well, yes, biden, in his own manner , once again shook his finger, saying that i do not advise anyone to take advantage of this situation, who is trying to take advantage of it, not with a finger, with two aircraft Carrier Groups, but who is he threatening, who is he threatening, us . Well, this looks extremely strange to the arabs , well, it is even more illogical as a form of support for israel, but in my opinion this also will not work, in a word, it only adds uncertainty and complexity to all middle eastern situations. Thats what i would say. Karanchikh nazarov, an Outstanding Film director and a person very familiar with the International Situation, im not afraid to say, a historian with an encyclopedic knowledge of what is happening in various. Regions world, but now i want to ask you specifically as a film director, well, look, there were absolutely terrible, ugly pictures of what terrorists did to civilians, residents of israel, not only to civilians, but especially to civilians, since it was covered in russia, they are trying in some places, for example, the new york times, to create the impression that russia. Did not express its concern and indignation at what was happening, but i dont know, on this program, we were extremely frank and extremely specific about this, and did not from my point of view, it was impossible to be indignant, but then this indignation, which was for the benefit of israel, here, of course, such a tragic situation, what to say. What is beneficial, what is not, in general, its even somehow inconvenient, but you want to get at least some benefit from any crisis. Israel received great support in the overwhelming majority of states in the world, in public opinion, and after this israel declares that they will stop at nothing, including large sacrifices from nonpeaceful population, new pictures appear, but only of what is happening not in israel, on the territory of gaza, and these pictures are also frightening, especially if you think not about the reaction, even in the west, but about the reaction of the arab street, then i can imagine , like hamas, which in general just seemed to have done something outrageously dangerous , but they are already starting to look like victims, and what is the United States doing, instead of saying, like the european union, which said that they support israel , but we must take into account the norms of international law, no, the United States, in the person of President Biden and his assistants, are beating themselves into groups, declaring that the United States is categorically, completely on the side of israel, not just on the side of israel, as they say, they will show everyone who can have an active different point of view. , what do you think this all means, what could this lead to, in terms of stability in the middle east, or lack thereof . This will definitely not lead to stability, this is absolutely obvious, but here one cannot. Disagree with our president when he yesterday, i think, he said that this is a complete failure of the United States in the middle east, and this is obvious, in principle, after the ninety first year, after the soviet union left, as it were, from the political arena, including from the near east, the United States was in complete control, they became the master of the world in general, including the middle east, well. This is the result, one might say, the middle east, this is the leadership of the United States, did not bring anything good, and the most important thing is that in my opinion it is impossible to decide this issue, the most complex issue indeed, has such prehistory, without the participation of other large states, and russia and i think, and turkey, iran, but it is impossible to resolve this issue, because in this issue we really need to find some kind of fair solution, which on the one hand will give the palestinians the opportunity to exist, to really create their own state , on the other hand, to guarantee the security of israel, this is also important, because without this there will also be no peace, but this is impossible, the americans cannot to do this today, it seems to me that this is precisely the reason why they are constantly trying to pretend that they are, as it were , threatening everyone, etc. , etc. , regarding the terrorist attack . Well, i think its obvious that this must be condemned unconditionally, all this horror that was happening there, this, this is unacceptable, not in relation to civilians, nor by the way, the military, so to speak, it is clear that war is a terrible thing , but still, there must still be some measure, a measure in all these matters, perhaps, how is terror different . From legal, even the most brutal military operations, terrorism is distinguished by the fact that they strike indiscriminately, and not only, and not only do they not try to save the lives of civilians, but in general, they believe that strikes on civilians are, are part, the legal part, of the operation, lets see what the israeli minister of defense, general galland, said about his plans in relation to gaza. I have lifted all restrictions, we have resumed control of the territory and are moving on to a fullscale offensive. Hamas wanted change in the gaza strip and it will change to 180 compared to what the terrorists thought. They will regret this moment, the gas will never return to what it was before, it will take weeks or months. Who would nt come to behead . Basically, now, in my opinion, in this situation, israel and netanyakh are in a rather difficult situation, on the one hand, of course, all these horrors that we saw at the beginning of this war, but on the other hand, you can imagine, what will happen in the gas if an operation begins there, this is a densely populated city, it is clear that there are all sorts of things underneath it shelter, its all already clear that underneath it , as they say, its full of civilians, it will simply turn into some kind of armageddon, in which case the informational pictures from there will begin to obscure. As they say, here are the first, first frames, so i looked at pictures of how the israelis were destroying, destroying buildings, buildings of peaceful houses, yes, and you know, it was reminiscent of pictures from soviet films about stalingrad, this is what it looked like, absolutely, and when jews start behaving like nazis, at least when it starts to look like they are behaving yourself in this way, the security of israel is not a way by the way, i do not rule out that there is some kind of plan in this in general, i do not rule out that there is some kind of plan, to draw, to draw into gaza, the military units of the israelis, i think, not tanyahu, as a very experienced leader , he most likely understands this, so you see, he still seems to have this feeling, he doesnt know how to approach this, because i also drew attention. With what cruelty these crimes were actually committed by hamas in the early days, how as if to deliberately provoke him to be some kind of very strong, very emotional blow, against this background, if israel sends large troops there, it starts there, then stalingrad, but only 2 million civilians, this will, of course, be a false moment, in this sense, a rather difficult situation, and for netanyahu, in my opinion, senator, so i will suggest what Richard Nixon would have done together with henry kissinger, if there had been a similar situation, he, of course, would have brought some appropriate American Armed forces, combat readiness, its probably him i would have made it quieter, with a weapon, well i probably would have done this, because this is how great powers behave when they have the appropriate capabilities, after that i think that either myself. I called the president of iran, or asked kissinger to call or even meet with the Iranian Foreign minister affairs, i would say that this is an absolutely terrible situation, this is an absolutely unacceptable situation, that the United States has begun a new dialogue with iran, that the United States welcomes irans new dialogue with moderate arab states, first of all, saudi. Therefore it is very important that the United States, iran, in this situation , if they were not partners, then at least there would not be a clash, so that they would not turn out to be adversaries, which no one needs, thats what i have dreams of dreams, or is this really how diplomacy used to work, well, thats how it worked before, i would like to hope it will work in the future, its completely vague, the hope is that maybe now it will work this way, because this is a continuation of that thoughts expressed by karen georgievich, without major powers cannot be avoided, but what we see so far, so far we see quite active work, by the way, to say, our president , minister of foreign affairs, we had a dialogue with turkey, with iran, with iraq , probably the main topic of discussion was precisely the crisis around , around gas, and what are they doing. Our, well, lets say, opponents on the other side, now theres a new term, former partners, lets say, former, lets say, lets say, former partners, but lets say, the same european union, its basically given a different kind spells, blaming one side, rightly accusing, absolutely right, because this terrorism is some kind of monstrous violence that is intolerable, but you cant see it like that. As exclusively black and white, not because it is good or bad, but because it leads nowhere. Vladislav shrygin, a famous military expert, tell us what you imagine an Israeli Military operation against gaza might look like. I would like to start by sending those same two Aircraft Carriers, because this decision from a Military Point of view is absolutely situational and in no way is connected at all. With any military component, because even two Aircraft Carriers against iran are generally nothing, it is quite obvious that this is just an action of the biden team, which is trying to switch the agenda from the inconvenient agenda that is in the ukrainian direction to a new one a victorious agenda that america is strong again, again it is sending forces to where it can solve everything, it is obvious that the team has no real plan now. There is no, so in this case we of course must focus but what is happening now in israel, what can it do . One must understand that, of course, now israel is hesitating, hesitating for several reasons, from a Military Point of view, it needs to clearly gather all its forces, and most importantly, create a real plan that one way or another it can carry out, quite obviously and not at all i doubt that the israeli general staff understands perfectly well that, as the minister of defense promises, rolling all the gas into asphalt will not work under any circumstances, it can be cut, it is possible, why not will it work . Because, firstly, this will require a huge amount of time, and secondly, they are aware that the military potential of hamas has not been undermined even by 10 , because this is what karen georgivich said, underground gases, this huge, not only the city, these are huge warehouses, this is a huge system that allows you to sit under any bombs, they have now brought the army to more than 300,000 people, well , in this case they certainly have huge advantages, but they understand very well, that battles in city blocks, especially in destroyed city blocks, in fact, not only do they nullify technical superiority in many ways, but they also add to this and of course, as you yourself just said, within a week of such battles the whole world will switch completely to the other side, because the destruction of an urban agglomeration of two million. This is all monstrous, what the terrorists are doing is monstrous, this is clear to everyone, and never a single cruelty , never a single atrocity justifies the atrocity of the other side, this axiom of war, in this case, of course, for israel the task is practically impossible, in my opinion, since it so happened that i saw israels last war around 2006 in lebanon,