Tech
your username
2 hours ago
On Friday, opposer DISH Network LLC filed a notice of opposition before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board against applicant NVIDIA Corporation’s application for the NVIDIA Hopper mark, asserting that it will be damaged by the registration of the applicant’s mark because of the likelihood of confusion with its Hopper-related marks.
According to the opposition, DISH owns a variety of registered trademarks related to its Hopper service. The trademarks cover “Digital video recorders … communications equipment, namely, set-top boxes for receiving video programming; Television receivers; and satellite receivers.” These marks include Hopper, the stylized Hopper, HopperGo and Hopper Duo, as well as other Hopper-formative marks. DISH claimed that its marks predate those of NVIDIA both for the filing date and first date of use, some as early as 2011 and 2012, respectively. Additionally, DISH noted that the Hopper marks “have achieved great stre
on Amazon
The Television Viewer Protection Act finally went into effect last month, so I was curious to see how companies like Comcast and Spectrum are dealing the billing transparency component in particular. None of these companies are known for being up-front about pricing; would the new law change things?
Short answer: Not really. Cable companies still advertise prices far below what you’ll actually pay, and some of them avoid revealing their true prices until the last possible moment. Even if they’re following the letter of the law, they’re not quite capturing the spirit.
The ever-expanding cable bill