Latest Breaking News On - லலிதா குமாரி - Page 3 : comparemela.com

DLSA Reasi holds sensitization prog on SC directions

Share Reasi: District Legal Service Authority, Reasi today organised an Online Sensitization Programme for the Senior Police Officers,SHOs and Prosecuting Officers of District Reasi on the theme ‘Ensuring Compliance of Directions of the Supreme Court laid down in Arnesh Kumar V/s State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273.’ The programme was held on the directions of Justice Ali Mohammad Magray, the Chairman High Power Committee of U.T of J&K(Executive Chairman of J&K Legal Services Authority) and under the guidance and supervision of R N Wattal, Chairman, District Legal Services Authority, Reasi, and Secretary DLSA, Rekha Kapoor Nischal.

Jammu and kashmirAmit guptaRenu guptaRekha kapoor nischalRanjeev kumarReasi katraJustice ali mohammad magrayShalender singhArnesh kumarHigh power committeeCompliance of directions the supreme courtJk legal services authoritySuperintendent of policeDistrict legal service authorityDistrict legal services authorityOnline sensitization programme

பழம்பெரும் நடிகர் ஆனந்தனின் மகன் காலமானார் - Veteran Actor Anandan son passed away

பழம்பெரும் நடிகர் ஆனந்தனின் மகன் காலமானார் - Veteran Actor Anandan son passed away
dinamalar.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from dinamalar.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Tamil naduUnited statesLalita kumariதமிழ் நாடுஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்லலிதா குமாரி

Supreme Court Monthly Digest: March 2021 [74 SC Judgments] [Citation LL 2021 SC 118 To LL 2021 SC 192]

A Bench comprising of Navin Sinha and KM Joseph observed that an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to set aside an award is covered by moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Section 34 proceeding is a proceeding against the corporate debtor in a court of law pertaining to a challenge to an arbitral award and would be covered just as an appellate proceeding in a decree from a suit would be covered, the bench headed by Justice RF Nariman observed in the judgment titled P Mohanraj & Ors. v. M/s Shah Brothers Ispat Ltd.

New delhiJammu and kashmirUttar pradeshState of west bengalWest bengalAndhra pradeshMadhya pradeshHimachal pradeshState of rajasthanTamil naduState of assamState of andhra pradeshState of keralaChaganti satyanarayanSurya kantLalita kumari

Hindustan Zinc Disinvestment Case: Supreme Court Decides To Examine Status Report By CBI, Adjourns Hearing To Tuesday

Share This - x Supreme Court has on Tuesday observed that it will examine the status report submitted by CBI in matter regarding disinvestment of the Government s shares in Hindustan Zinc Limited in 2002 A three-judge Bench of CJI Bobde, Justice Bopanna and Justice Ramasubramanian has decided to go through the Status report and take up the matter on Tuesday. The Court was hearing a plea by National Confederation of Officers Associations of Central Public Sector Undertakings questioning the Centre s decision to disinvest in Hindustan Zinc. The Bench expressed its inclination towards deciding separately, the two prayers made in the plea, regarding government disinvesting its shareholding and investigation done by the CBIz

India generalPrashant bhushanJustice bopannaR subhash reddyLalita kumariJustice ramasubramanianHindustan zinc limitedHindustand zincHindustan petroleumSupreme court benchHindustan zincSupreme courtVedanta companyNational confederationTop courtHead of branch

SC says open enquiry by ACB only to ascertain if serious offence disclosed; dismisses appeal by ex-public servant | India News

MUMBAI: The Supreme Court (SC) recently dismissed an appeal filed by Charansingh Thakur to question a notice from Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) for him to participate in an ‘open enquiry’ into ‘disproportionate assets’ allegations made in 2018, against him. The SC said holding of a “discrete/open enquiry, at preregistration of FIR stage in the case of allegation of corrupt practice of accumulating assets disproportionate to his known sources of income, cannot be said to be per se illegal.’’ The SC bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and M R Shah who passed the judgment said, an enquiry at pre-FIR stage is permissible and also “desirable,’’ in cases of ‘disproportionate assets’ “only to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not.’’

Charansingh thakurSubodh dharmadhikariRaja thakareLalita kumariSupreme courtCorruption bureauAnti corruption bureauJusticesdy chandrachudMaharashtra cabinetAnil deshmukhJustices sb shukreCorruption actMaharashtra state anti corruptionProhibition intelligence bureau manualDirector generalPublic servant